The evidence shows that the Supreme Court's electronic record systems are unreliable and invalid. Most alarming is the ongoing refusal of the Supreme Court to certify its own decisions.
A reasonable person would conclude that the May 18, 2011 Decision is a simulated court record.
Original Title
11-11-14 Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11) - Letter from the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, denying request for certification of the May 18, 2011 Decision, postponing the execution of the prison sentence s (Eng + Heb)
The evidence shows that the Supreme Court's electronic record systems are unreliable and invalid. Most alarming is the ongoing refusal of the Supreme Court to certify its own decisions.
A reasonable person would conclude that the May 18, 2011 Decision is a simulated court record.
The evidence shows that the Supreme Court's electronic record systems are unreliable and invalid. Most alarming is the ongoing refusal of the Supreme Court to certify its own decisions.
A reasonable person would conclude that the May 18, 2011 Decision is a simulated court record.
11-11-14 Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11) - Letter from the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, denying request for certification of the May 18, 2011 Decision, postponing the execution of the prison sentence s
Attached:
# Record Page # 1 11-11-14 Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11) - Letter from the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, denying request for certification of the May 18, 2011 Decision, postponing the execution of the prison sentence (English) 4 2 11-11-14 Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11) - Letter from the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, denying request for certification of the May 18, 2011 Decision, postponing the execution of the prison sentence (Hebrew) 5
Brief Chronology: Request filed with the Israeli legislature (Knesset) to examine the integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the Israeli Supreme Court
The evidence shows that the Supreme Court's electronic record systems are unreliable and invalid. Most alarming is the ongoing refusal of the Supreme Court to certify its own decisions.
Jerusalem, November 22 - request was file with members of the Israeli legislature (Knesset) by Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), to initiate review by the Knesset's Legal Counsel of the reliability and integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the Israeli Supreme Court. [i] Similar requests had been previously filed with the State Ombudsman, with the Attorney General, and with the President of the Bar Association. [ii]
The request was accompanied with a report, pertaining to the electronic case management and online public access systems of the Supreme Court, showing various deficiencies in the systems, [iii] which enable the conduct of simulated proceedings and online publication of simulated decisions of the Court. [iv]
The report focused on records in cases related to former President of the State of Israel Moshe Katzav, who was convicted on sex crimes in the District Court in Tel Aviv and sentenced to a seven-year prison term. [v] On May 18, 2011, media reported that Katzav's request to postpone the execution of his prison sentence was granted by the Supreme Court, in a decision that was widely criticized as undermining equality before the law. [vi] The decision was issued by Justice Yoram Danziger, who has since suspended himself from the Court, in conjunction with a criminal investigation against him, in relationship to his conduct as an attorney, prior to joining the Court.
However, Dr Zernik's report concluded that there was no way to ascertain that the May 18, 2011 decision was deemed by the Supreme Court itself as a valid and binding decision, since the Supreme Court denied access to the respective authentication records (if any existed).
Pursuant to the law in Israel, and also the law in most civilized nations, public access to inspect judicial records is guaranteed. However, following the implementation in recent years of the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the authentication records are excluded from both the online public access system and the paper files of the Court. Instead, the authentication records are hidden today from public access in the Supreme Court's case management system. z 2 / 3 November 22, 2011
Moreover, regarding the May 18, 2011 Decision: The Supreme Court's Magistrate Guy Shani refused to provide a statement on the record, that the decision was and is a valid and binding decision of the Court; [vii] Appeal of the Magistrate's refusal to provide such statement was conducted (and denied) in a manner that would lead a reasonable person to conclude that it was deemed a simulated litigation from start to finish; [viii] The Supreme Court and the Ministry of Justice jointly refused to permit access to a copy of the May 18, 2011 Decision, as served on the State Prosecution (if served at all). [ix] The Supreme Court refused to provide a certified copy of the May 18, 2011 decision. [x]
"Most alarming is the ongoing refusal of the Supreme Court to certify its own decisions," says Dr Zernik.
This morning, Dr Zernik again filed requests with the Supreme Court for certified copies of the Court's decisions in these cases. [xi]
Dr Zernik has gained expertise over the past decade in analyzing the integrity of electronic record systems of the banks, courts, and prisons. His reports on this matter were published in computer science and criminology journals, and presented in international computer science and criminology conferences. [xii] The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California. [xiii]
Computer science/informatics experts hold a unique civic duty in the safeguard of the integrity of the courts, Human Rights, and civil society in the digital era.
LINKS: [i] 11-11-20 Request for Review by the Knesset's Legal Counsel in Re_ Simulated Records in the Supreme Court of the State of Israel in Cases Related to Former President Moshe Katzav-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/73245373/ [ii] 11-10-09 Requests filed with the State Ombudsman, with the Attorney General, with Members of Knesset, and with President of the Bar Association for comments in re: records and electronic systems of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel-s (Eng) http://www.scribd.com/doc/68133603/ [iii] 11-11-20 Simulated Decisions in the Supreme Court of Israel in Cases Related to Former President Moshe Katzav (English) s http://www.scribd.com/doc/73239491/ [iv] "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows: Texas Penal Code 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to: (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or (2) cause another to: (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document. (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered. [v] Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11) and Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) [vi] 11-11-13 Former President Moshe Katzav compilation of media reports (Heb +Eng) http://www.scribd.com/doc/60121427/ [vii] 11-08-14 Katzav v State of Israel (3372-11) in the Supreme Court - Clerk Shani's Decision on Zernik's August 14, 2011 Request for Clarification in re: validity of the May 18, 2011 Decision, postponing the execution of the prison sentence of Katzav http://www.scribd.com/doc/73229600/ [viii] see [ii], above. [ix] see [ii], above. [x] 11-11-14 Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11) - Letter from the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel, denying request for certification of the May 18, 2011 Decision, postponing the execution of the prison sentence s http://www.scribd.com/doc/73228671/ [xi] 11-11-22 Requests for certified decisions of the Supreme Court: z 3 / 3 November 22, 2011
- 11-11-22 Zernik v State of Israel (6041/11) Repeat Request for a Signed and Certified Copy of the September 7, 2011 Judgment (Eng + Heb) http://www.scribd.com/doc/73460055/ - 11-11-22 Moshe Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11) - Repeat Request for a copy of the May 18, 2011 Decision in Instant Case, Signed by the Justice and Certified by the Office of the Clerk, and for Service of a Signed Decision on Instant Request (Eng + Heb) http://www.scribd.com/doc/73464340/ - 11-11-22 Moshe Katzav v State of Israel (3372/11) - Request for a Copy of the September 21, 2011 Decision in Instant Case, Signed by the Justices and Certified by the Office of the Clerk, and for Due Service of a Signed Decision on Instant Request (Eng + Heb) http://www.scribd.com/doc/73466693/ [xii] 11-07-04 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/ [xiii] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report, with a note referring to "corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California". http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/ [ [zerniks digital signature - jz]
[Coat of Arms of the State of Israel- jz]
THE SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL
November 14, 2011 To:
Dr Joseph Zernik PO Box 31440 Jerusalem 91313
Dear Sir:
RE: Request for a certified copy of the Courts decision in case 3372/11 Ref: Your letter dated November 2, 2011
Thank you for receipt of your letter, referenced above.
All judgments and decisions of the Supreme Court, which are permitted to be published, appear in the online public access system.
Regretfully, we will not be able to grant your request for a certified copy of a decision in a case, where you are not a party.
Every citizen is permitted to inspect the decisions of the Court, which are published online. We will not be able to provide certified copies of decisions to those, who are not party to a case.
11-11-24 Correspondence With The Ministry of Justice of The State of Israel, in Re: Electronic Record Systems of The Supreme Court of The State of Israel
11-08-30 Yaakov Kadosh V State of Israel (2016/11), Criminal Appeal in The Supreme Court of The State of Israel - Online Public Access Records S (Eng + Heb)
14-03-11 Presiding Judge Ehud Rekem is again asked to provide certified copies of court records // נשיא בית המשפט השלום חיפה, השופט אהוד רקם מתבקש שוב להמציא העתקים מאושרים של כתבי בי-דין
2015-01-04 FOIA Request on the Administration of Courts (פ - 7/2015) : IT system Net HaMishpat // בקשה בכפוף לחוק חופש המידע על הנהלת בתי המשפט (פ - 7/2015) : מערכת המידע "נט המשפט"
13-11-21 “12 of Heshvan et” al v Attorney General Weinestein et al (2684/12 and 2688/12) in the High Court of Justice – conduct of simulated litigation in a Petition for a Conditional Decree // הליכים למראית עין בעתירה לצו על תנאי בעניין ספר "תורת המלך"
12-03-21 Evidence of Large-Scale Fraud in the Electronic Systems and Electronic Records of the Supreme Court of the State of Israel: Appendix 10 12-03-21 FOIA Requests on the Administration of Court and Their Dispositions s
13-01-04 FATCA-related Consumer Complaint No 2 Against Bank HaPoalim, BM, and Its Chief Internal Auditor Jacob Orbach, Filed With Bank of Israel-Banking Regulation
12-11-27 Moshe Silman et al v Bituach Leumi (1752-08) – Magistrate Avigail Cohen Decision on Request #9 – 2nd refusal to rule on Due Process, certification of previous decisions, production of appointment record of "Chief Clerk" Kobi Bleich