Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORNITHOPTER
ORNITHOPTER
he design process began with the selection of materials for the wings,
T
fuselage, and flapping mechanism. Lightweight balsa wood was
chosen for the frame due to its high strength-to-weight ratio, and
Mylar was used for the wings for its durability and flexibility. The
propulsion system consisted of a rubber band, which was selected for
its potential to store and release mechanical energy efficiently.
urrent State-of-the-Art:
C
Contemporary ornithopter research spans a wide spectrum, from
small-scale hobbyist projects to ambitious academic and
industrial endeavors. Miniature robotic ornithopters have gained
popularity for applications in surveillance, environmental
monitoring, and entertainment. These lightweight, agile devices
often incorporate advanced materials such as carbon fiber and
utilize sophisticated control algorithms for stable flight.
ings:The wings are the most crucial elements forgenerating lift and
W
propulsion. They are often made of a light, flexible material such as
Mylar, thin plastic, or tissue paper stretched over a frame of
lightweight spars (usually balsa wood). The wings must be flexible yet
strong enough to endure the repeated stress of flapping.
Wing Design:
Flapping Mechanism:
Power Source:
Tail Assembly:
Control Systems:
nce all parts are fabricated and assembled, extensive testing is
O
required to optimize the ornithopter’s flight. This might involve
adjusting the wing tension, the balance of the fuselage, the angle
of the tail, or the tightness of the rubber band. Flight testing is
iterative, often requiring multiple adjustments to achieve the
desired flight characteristics.
WORKING
Flapping Propellers
In the ideal fixed-lift system, the flappers can be regarded as a
propeller that cyclically reverses its direction, pitch, and camber.
Whereas each blade of a rotating propeller continues round and
round, each blade of a flapping propeller traverses a certain angle
and then reverses direction, twice per cycle. If the typical
membrane structure is used, the membrane pitch and camber will
reverse automatically as the airfoil changes its path through the
air. The forces produced in the upstroke and downstroke are the
same, but opposite to one another.
otice also that the two definitions give opposite results: a rotary
N
propeller with a high pitch would be best for rapid flight (high
advance ratio), whereas a flapping wing with a high pitch is best
for slow flight (low advance ratio). To avoid confusion, I have used
the word “incidence” instead of “pitch” when describing the wing
angle relative to the longitudinal axis of the ornithopter. This
allows the word “pitch” to retain the same meaning that it has for
rotary propellers.
CONCLUSION