SCENARIO 2

Customer Notification:

Pros:

▪ Tells customers how their data is used, making them trust the
company more.
▪ Respects customers' privacy.

Cons:

▪ Some customers might worry about how their data is used.

▪ It takes a lot of time and money for the company to set up.

Policy Establishment:

Pros:

▪ Sets clear rules for handling customer data.

▪ Helps the company follow the law.

Cons:

▪ The rules might be too strict and inflexible.

▪ Making the rules is hard and costs a lot.

Professional Responsibility:

Pros:

▪ Keeps things fair and right when using technology and data.
▪ Makes people trust the company and the tech industry more.

Cons:

▪ It's not always clear what's right, which can be tough.

▪ Sometimes doing the right thing clashes with making money or using
new tech.

Ethical Data Mining:

 Pros:

▪ Helps the company and customers by finding useful information.

▪ Makes decisions better and gives customers a better experience.

Cons:

▪ If the company isn't careful, it might invade people's privacy.

▪ Customers might feel like their privacy is ignored if they don't agree to
data mining.

Transparency and Consent:

Pros:

▪ People trust the company more when it's honest about how it uses
data.
▪ Getting permission from people before using their data respects their
privacy.

Cons:

▪ If the company isn't clear, people won't trust it and might get mad.
▪ Getting permission can be hard and might limit what the company
can do with data.

Legal Compliance:

Pros:

▪ Following the law keeps the company and customers safe.

▪ It helps avoid trouble and keeps the company's reputation good.

Cons:

▪ Breaking the law can hurt the company and its reputation.
▪ Keeping up with changing laws is tough and costs a lot.

Conclusion:

To do data mining rights, companies need to be ethical, honest, and follow

the law. Having clear rules and being responsible helps to avoid problems and keep
 trust. Being ethical, honest, and legal helps companies get the most out of data
while still respecting people's privacy and trust.

SCENARIO 3

• Self-censorship: It's up to individuals to decide what they want to say, within the law
and what's considered okay in their community.
• Social media companies' responsibility: Companies should make rules about what
people can post, like banning hate speech. But users also need to be careful about
what they share.
• Data retention: Companies should think carefully before keeping posts and data
online forever, considering people's privacy and security.
• Public policy on freedom of expression: Like with traditional media, there should be
rules for what's allowed on social media, balancing free speech with stopping
things like bullying and lies.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, self-censorship should remain a personal choice, while social

media companies have a responsibility to regulate harmful content. Data retention
policies should prioritize privacy considerations, and public policy should strike a
balance between protecting freedom of expression and addressing issues like
online harassment and misinformation.

SCENARIO 4

• Khadeejah's Choice: Instead of refusing to work with the team over diversity
concerns, Khadeejah could suggest a review of their practices. This might lead to
positive changes in how the team operates.
• Impact on Sales: Having diverse perspectives in the team could lead to more
creative designs that appeal to a wider audience and potentially boost sales.
However, it's tricky to say for sure how diversity directly affects sales.
• Responsibility for Inclusivity: As part of the production team, Khadeejah shares the
responsibility for making the game inclusive. She can push for more diverse
characters and ways to make the game's message more inclusive.
 • Effect of Game Messages: The messages in games can shape how players think and
feel. Developers should make sure these messages are inclusive and don't
reinforce harmful stereotypes, creating a fairer gaming experience.
• Diversity in Teams: Having a diverse team is crucial for coming up with fresh ideas
and making games that appeal to everyone. Without diversity, a team might miss
out on different perspectives and end up making games that only represent one
point of view.
• Shared Duty for Diversity: Everyone involved in making games needs to work
together to achieve diversity. It's not just about making better games—it's about
creating a more inclusive industry that welcomes people from all backgrounds.

Conclusion:

In summary, Khadeejah's experience shows how vital diversity and inclusion are in gaming.
Rather than saying no, suggesting a team review can lead to positive improvements.
Diverse teams bring fresh ideas and inclusivity, which can boost sales and create a better
gaming environment. It's crucial for everyone involved to promote diversity, making gaming
fairer and more enjoyable for everyone.

SCENARIO 5

• Prohibiting Integration of Databases: This is about deciding whether to stop

combining databases to protect children and families, especially undocumented
immigrants. It's a tough call because while it can help find illegal immigrants, it
might also scare them and make it hard for them to get education. Finding a
balance between safety, privacy, and ethics is key here.

• Implications of Large Government Databases: Governments having big databases

bring up ethical and practical issues. Things like privacy, security, and misuse of
data become concerns. Governments need to handle these worries properly to
make sure data practices are fair and legal.

• Impact on Free Speech: Big government databases might make people scared to
say what they think because they worry about being watched. This fear can make
people hold back on expressing themselves freely. It's crucial to protect free
speech while dealing with data collection and surveillance.
• Individual Rights and Data Access: This is about people's rights to see and fix their
personal data in government databases. Letting people check and correct their data
helps keep things accurate and transparent. But making sure corrections happen
everywhere and quickly can be tricky.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, handling big government databases means finding a balance

between security, ethics, and people's rights. When deciding on database
integration, safety and access to education for vulnerable groups should come first.
Ethical database management means protecting privacy and being transparent. It's
crucial to protect free speech while collecting data. Letting people check and fix
their data helps keep things accurate and fair. Balancing all these factors is key for a
fair and inclusive system.

SCENARIO 6

• Informed Consent: Employers should always get clear permission from

employees before using surveillance technologies. Open communication is
vital to make sure employees know what's happening.

• Transparency: Companies need to be upfront about how much and what

kind of surveillance they're doing at work. Employees have the right to know
how their information is being used.

• Retention and Storage: There should be clear rules about how long
companies can keep surveillance data and when they should delete it. Data
should only be kept if it's needed and for specific reasons.

• Less Invasive Alternatives: Companies should look for less intrusive ways to
monitor employees before resorting to big surveillance setups. It's about
finding a balance between tracking productivity and respecting privacy.
 • Impact on Employees: Companies need to think about how surveillance
might affect employees' stress and happiness at work. Surveillance
shouldn't make the workplace feel uncomfortable or violate privacy rights.

• Sharing Data with Others: Companies should be careful when sharing

surveillance data with other companies. They should follow data protection
laws and get employees' permission before sharing anything.

Conclusion:

In summary, good workplace surveillance means being clear, getting permission,

protecting data, caring about employees, and looking for gentler ways to monitor.
Companies need clear rules to make sure surveillance is done right.