CLWTXN - (1) General Principles of Taxation (Part 1)

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Part One

Ramon V. del Rosario College of Business


Commercial Law Department

Taxation Law

GENERAL
PRINCIPLES
Agenda
01 Prayer

02 Attendance

03 Lecture / Discussion

04 Forum

05 Conclusion
Concept & Purpose
of Taxation
Definition and Concept

a. Revenue Raising Measure*


The process or means by which the
sovereign, through its law-making body,
raises income to defray the necessary
expenses of government; a method of
apportioning the cost of government
among those who in some measure are

TAX
privileged to enjoy its benefits and must,
therefore, bear its burdens

b. As a Power*
i. It refers to the inherent power of the
state to demand enforced contributions
for public purpose.
ii. Is described as a destructive power
which interferes with the personal and
property rights of the people and takes
from them a portion of their property for
the support of the government.
Inherent in Essentially a
x
Subject to constitutional
Sovereignty* Legislative Function and inherent limitations
The power to tax is an attribute The power to tax is peculiarly The power to tax is said to be the
of sovereignty. It is a power and exclusively legislativeand strongest of all the powers of the
emanating from necessity cannot be exercised by the government. It is unlimited, plenary,
because it imposes a necessary exevutive or judicial branch of comprehensive and supreme. In the
burden to preserve the State’s the government. absence of constitutional restrictions,
sovereignty. the principal checks on its abuse rest
on the responsibility of the Congress
to their constitutents.
ELEMENTS
#1 #2 #3*

Enforced proportional contribution


from persons and properties Imposed by the State by virtue of its It is levied for the support of
-Its imposition is in no way dependent upon
sovereignty government
the will or assent of the person taxed. It is
not contractual,either express or implied, but
positive acts of government
Characteristics of
Taxing Power
01 03*
It is comprehensive. Covers It is plenary or complete. Under
persons, businesses, activities, NIRC, the BIR may avail of certain
professions, rights, and remedies to ensure the collection
privileges. of taxes. Taxes, being the
lifeblood of the government,
02* should be collected without
unnecessary hindrance, every
It is unlimited. A tax does not
precaution must be taken not to
cease to be valid merely because
unduly suppress it.
it regulates, discourages, or even
definitely deters the activities
taxed. The power to impose taxes 04
is one so unlimited in force and It is supreme. It is supreme
so searching in extent, that the insofar as the selection of the
courts scarcely venture to subject of taxation is concerned,
declare that it is subject to any but it does not mean that it is
restrictions whatever, except superior to the other inherent
such as rest in the discretion of powers of the State.
the authority which exercises it.
Characteristics of
Tax
01 05
Enforced contribution Personal to the taxpayer

02 06
Proportionate in character Levied on persons, property, rights,
-Laid by some rule of apportionment acts, privileges or transactions
which is usually based on ability to pay

03 07
Levied for public purpose. Levied by the State which has control
-Revenues derived from taxes cannot over the subject to be taxed
be used for purely private purposes or
for the exclusive benefit of private
persons.

04 08
Generally payable in the form of money Levied by the law-making body of the State.
– Although the law may provide -The power to tax is a legislative power but is
payment in kind (e.g. backpay also granted to local governments, subject to
certificates under Sec. 2, R.A. No. 304, such guidelines and limitations as law may be
as amended) provided by law.
ACTIVITY
Please read and digest the following cases:
Mandanas v. Purisima, G.R. No. 199802, July 03, 2018
Ermita-Malate Hotel and Motel Operators Association,
Inc. v. Mayor of Manila, G.R. No. L-24693, July 31, 1967
Angeles University vs. City of Angeles, G.R. No. 189999,
July 27, 2012
Tio v. Videogram Regulatory Board, G.R. No. 75697
(1987)
Pascual vs. Sec of Public Works, G.R. No. L-10405,
December, 29 1960

Contents: Facts, Issue & Ruling

Format: PDF Format; A4; Arial Font Style; 12 Font Size;


1" Margin on all sides; Single Spaced

Submit your case digests to your class beadle on or


before 12pm, 13 May 2024 (Monday).

You might also like