Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture Notes-6 Cost of Quality
Lecture Notes-6 Cost of Quality
The costs associated with quality are divided into two categories:
Costs associated with improving quality (Prevention costs and appraisal costs)
Costs due to poor quality (failure costs)
Where a product is not designed to the expected standard as when you do not get its results fast,
these will result in various quality cost. Generally there are four types of cost of quality.
Prevention cost
Appraisal Costs
Internal failure costs
External failure costs
1. Prevention cost
Prevention cost is normally planned and are incurred before the actual operation or production of
goods and services. There are six types of prevention cost.
Appraisal cost
These are costs associated with suppliers and customer evaluation of purchased material,
processes as well as products and services to assure conformance with specified requirement.
Verification
Quality Audit
Inspection Equipment cost
Vender rating cost
These costs occur when results of work fail to reach the desired quality standards and are
detected before being transferred to the final customer. There are also six types of internal
failure costs:
Wastes
Scrap
Rework or modification
Re-inspection
Poor grading failure analysis.
These are costs that occur when a product or service fails to reach the desired quality standards
and is not detected until after transfer to the final consumer. External failure costs include
Repair and servicing of returned, refused good, loss of corporate image, litigation costs, lack of
future prospects or repeat purchase.
Delivered service will become as the Quality Service if it meets the customer
expectations. But customer expectation depends upon the customer perception, which
may differ from person to person.
WORK TEAMS
Teams are small groups that have complementary skills that they use to work towards a common
goal of which they are
Functional teams are composed of organizational members from several vertical levels of the
organizational hierarchy who perform specific organizational functions. A typical functional
team will have several subordinates and a manager who has authority to manage internal
operations and external relationships of a particular department or division of the organization.
Accounting, marketing, finance and human resources are examples of functional work teams.
Functional team members usually have different responsibilities but all work to perform the
same function of the department.
Most organizations that have different functional areas are arranged in functional teams
regardless of the size of the company.
Sometimes teams need to be formed by combining multiple, functional teams into one. These
cross-functional teams are composed of experts from various functional areas and work
cooperatively towards some organizational goal. Because these members are considered experts
of their individual functional area, they are usually empowered to make decisions on their own
without needing to consult management. Cross-functional teams are believed to improve
coordination of interdependent activities between specialized subunits.
Self-managed teams directly manage the day-to-day operation of their particular process or
department. Operate with a high level of autonomy and responsibility They are authorized to
make decisions on a wide range of issues (for example, safety, quality, maintenance, scheduling
and personnel). Their responsibilities also include processes traditionally held by managers, such
as goal-setting, allocation of assignments and conflict resolution.
Are you the type of person who prefers to manage yourself? Perhaps you have found yourself
thinking that you could do a better job than your boss. While most people who work in
organizations will have little opportunity for a high level of autonomy, or to steal their boss's job,
a practical solution to both of these aspirations can be found in self-directed work teams.
However, while the self-directed work team does operate with a high level of autonomy and
responsibility, the term can be misleading. Self-directed does not necessarily mean turning those
employees loose to do whatever they want in whichever manner they see fit.
Quality Circles:
1. It is a small group
2. Meet regularly after fixed interval of time especially after work.
3. Lack a focus and start by brain storming quality ideas then focus on how to solve them.
4. No management input but group is led by a supervisor who is mainly 1 st level
management or shop floor employees who select the quality problem.
5. Involves people of the same department
6. It’s a continuous group which is never dissolved.
7. Are less successful in problem solving.
1. It is a small group
2. Don’t meet regularly but only when there is a quality problem
3. Focused on a specific quality problem instead of brain storming quality ideas
4. Management provide an input in the focus teams by giving them the quality ideas when
they consider it significant
5. Involves people from all departments who are incorporated into focus teams making it
multi disciplinary
6. Are more successful in problem solving
7. Dissolved and abandoned when the quality problem is addressed.
INTRODUCTION
Benchmarking considers the experience of others and uses it. It is the essence of borrowing
ideas and adopting them to gain completive advantage
Most products and service improvements normally take place between standards. The concept of
bench marking tends to provide these attributes by measuring the organization’s operations along
its products and services against those of its competitors.
1. Internal bench making. Measures and compares internal operations of the company
such as department by department.
2. Competitive bench marking. Compares one competitor with the other
3. Functional bench marking. Compares departments of organizations in the same
industry e.g. the launch loans department of Standard Bank can be compared to that of
Barclay’s Bank.
4. Generic bench marking Compares processes that are similar to those of the organization
irrespective of the industries in which they are in.
PROCESS OF BENCHMARKING