Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
Sustainability Constraints
Sustainability constraints are essential to be take into consideration because sustaining or maintaining a
certain structure can be too expensive and it may lead to failure if it was not considered in the design.
Using these constraints, the designer must be able to create a design that is efficient and will maximize the
use of materials and minimize the impact of environment.
Constructability Constraints
In constructability constraints, the factors that are usually being considered are the time completion of the
project and the space occupied by the structure. Not being able to finish a project within the given time
frame results to higher cost of construction and bad reputation. The designer must create a design that can
be finished given the limited time and it should not bypass the other land and properties in order to prevent
unnecessary problems.
Architectural Constraints
Architectural constraints were also considered in the design of the struc ture. These are the limitations
imposed on the architectural design and is usually related about the dimensions of structural members to
look more aesthetically pleasing.
Social Constraints
The people living near the location of proposed project are also considered. The three -storey school
building will be designed in a way that it will be beneficial not only for the local of City of Las Pinas but also
to the adjacent cities.
3.2 Trade-offs
The following are the types of trade-offs and trade-offs considered in the design. One for framing system
which is the Special Moment Resisting Frame. Two for beams and girders which are W-sections and
Hollow Structural Sections. Three for columns which are W-sections, Hollow Structural Sections
(Rectangular or Square), and Hollow Structural Sections (Circular). One for connection which is bolted
connection. One for foundation which is isolated foundation.
Table 3.1 Overview of Trade-offs
Trade-off Number
Connection 1 (Bolted)
Foundation 1 (Isolated)
In order to calculate the total number of possible trade -offs, fundamental counting principle was used.
Circular hollow structural section is made by bending or rolling a flat steel plate into a circular shape to create
a hollow tube-like structure. This type of steel allows optimal distribution of material, resulting in a lighter
weight while maintaining strength.
Rectangular or Square hollow structural sections are formed by bending a steel plate that results in a hollow
box-like structure. The edge of the section makes it more suitable and applicable to structures that requires
bolted and welded connection. Like any other steel section, this type of steel also offers a high strength-to-
weight ratio which can reduce the overall expenses of a project.
Figure 3.3 Hollow Structural Sections
Isolated Footing
Isolated footing, also known as spread footing, is a type of shallow foundation that is used to transfer loads
from columns down to the soil. This type of footing provides the advantage of simplicity, cost-effectiveness,
and ease of construction. However, this may not be suitable for larger or heavily loaded structures, as they
may require more complex and deep foundation systems to distribute the load adequately.
Figure 3.4 Isolated Footing
Bolted Connection
Bolted connection refers to the joining of structural members using plates and bolts . This type of connection
is extensively utilized in various mechanical and structural systems due to several reasons such as easier
installation, time efficiency, cost effective, etc.
For the weighted sum, weighted percentage for each constraint must be determined and may be based on
what must be prioritized on the project and what is set by the client. It is important to note that the weighted
percentage should be up to 100 percent. The formula for the weighted sum is as follows:
∑
The top three design trade-off with the highest ranking or highest value of weighted sum will be chosen for
the initial analysis and design of the structure. After the initial design, the trade -off combinations will be
weighed again for the final assessment. The design trade-off with the highest ranking will be used for the
final design of the structure.