Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dag Uman J. Thesis
Dag Uman J. Thesis
Dag Uman J. Thesis
CHAPTER I
Introduction
consequences.
honesty.
Spiegel, 2002).
Althman,2024)
in 1956, and later on, it opened more programs, like law and
department.
Conceptual Framework
personal redemption.
academic pursuits.
about the plans you have for the future. Make a strategy to
persona.
following sub-problems:
four variables?
four variables?
Null Hypothesis
variables.
11
study conducted.
seek guidance.
hereby defined.
phenomenon.
obstacles.
department instructors.
or hurdles.
CHAPTER II
Related literature
of knowledge.
go about it:
you have for the future. Make a strategy to deal with the
Seek Guidance
following:
Indulging in Self-reflection
Ensuring Self-Accountability
Making amends
Being transparent
Seeking mentorship
Practicing mindfulness
determination.
a lot from seasoned folks who can offer advice, support, and
acknowledging them.
academic dishonesty.
Cheating
Plagiarism
Fabrication or falsification
Sabotage
23
Cheating
Plagiarism
plagiarism.
Fabrication or falsification
Sabotage
24
1. Unauthorized practices
academic integrity.
signatures.
write a paper.
communities.
factors include:
Peer pressure
Performance anxiety
Excuse making
Self-justification habits
Peer pressure
Performance Anxiety
taking skills.
Excuse making
use the excuse that the exams were unfair or a course was
cheat as well.
being caught.
Self-justification habits
Only once
themselves that:
it's okay"
(2003).
Social consequences
30
possible income.
Inaccurate assessment
Practical concerns
jeopardized.
research.
application of concepts.
cheating behaviors.
material.
upheld.
Personal Growth
34
RELATED STUDIES
Thomas M. Cizek
to prevent it.
institutions.
professional lives.
cheating behaviors.
educational communities.
work.
William Damon
3. Need for High Expectations: The book may argue for the
society.
40
and integrity.
raise the bar and create environments that nurture the full
41
with of inclusion.
42
CHAPTER III
data.
Research Method
Research Instrument
(Bodine, 2022).
and put the advice into practice. The final draft was sent
Gathering of Data
instructions.
Sampling Design
study.
be used for.
46
this study.
Statistical Treatment
number of respondents.
∑ F W
WM =
Where,
WM = Weighted Mean
F = Frequency
∑ = Summation symbol
47
each variable.
interpretation.
X 1 – X2
t =
(N1-1)(SD1)2 + (N2-1)(SD2)2 1 1
+
N 1 + N2 – 2 N1 N2
Where:
t = t-test
instructors.
students.
formula:
d.f. = N1 + N2 – 2
where,
school administrators.
teachers.
2 = constant number.
accepted.
Bibliography
A. Books
B. Internet Sources
https://www.niu.edu/academic-integrity/faculty/types/index,
Publishers.
https://www.hoover.org/profiles/william-
damon#:~:text=Damon's%20research%20explores%20how
%20people,purpose%20in%20families%20and%20schools.
https://www.edukasyon.ph/schools/southern-mindanao-colleges
https://www.thebehavioralscientist.com/glossary/ethical-
values
https://www.kaltmanlaw.com/education-attorney/representing-
students-plagiarism-and-cheating-matters
APPENDIX A
SOUTHERN MINDANAO COLLEGES
PAGADIAN CITY
(Letter to Respondents)
Dear Respondent,
Thank you.
JIRASC A. DAG-UMAN
Researcher
APPENDIX B
QUESTIONNAIRE-CHECKLIST
Part I. Background Information
Name:______________________________________
Address: (Optional)
____________________________________________
Please check your position in the school:
Instructor () Student ()
CURRICULUM VITAE
PERSONAL DATA
Angelina P. Amaran
Del Sur
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
54
April 2006
April 2010
Science
Pagadian City