F – ACAD - 29

SYLLABUS
COLLEGE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ENTERTAINMENT, AND COMMUNICATION
Program: Bachelor of Science in Information Technology

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

17. Alignment of Program Educational Objective (PEO) with Institutional Objectives (IO)

18. Alignment of Program Outcomes (PO) with Program Educational Objectives (PEO)

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

19. Alignment of Course Outcomes with Program Outcomes

Course Outcomes Program Outcomes
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4
CO1. Recommend appropriate operating system based on given system ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
requirements.
CO2. Plan and write a simple assembly language program ✔ ✔
CO3. Perform cost-benefit analysis for a proposed server solution. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

20 Course Learning Plan

Topic Learning CO Domain Topic Time Activities/ Performance Learning

Outcomes s Allotmen Strategies Indicators/ Resources
C-A-P t Assessment
(hr.) Tools
 Recall the PVMGO C/A UB PVMGO Week 1 Discussion, Recitation Student Handbook
of the University (2hrs) Recitation www.ub.edu.ph
and the college
 Recognize the
content of the
syllabus, course
requirements and
grading system.

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

 Explain basic CO1 C/A Introduction Week 2 Discussion, Students Stallings, W. (2019).
concepts and to Platform (3hrs) Recitation, answer online Computer Organization
computer Technologies/ Research quizzes to and Architecture
evolution. Computer work for basic assess their Designing for
Performance (11th
 Explain Organization computer understanding
ed.). Pearson
Performance and setup and of the lesson,
Education.
Concept of Architecture current
computer system computer M. Morris Mano.
technology (2017). Digital Logic
and and Computer Design.
architecture Pearson India.

John L. Hennessy, D. A.
P. (2019). Computer
Architecture, Sixth
Edition: A Quantitative
Approach enhanced.

 Explain Top -level CO1 Computer Week 3 Discussion, Students Stallings, W. (2019).
view of Computer Function and to Week Recitation, presented a Computer Organization
Function and Interconnectio 4 Demonstratio prerecorded and Architecture
Interconnection. n/ Memory (10hrs) n, group Designing for
Performance (11th
 Explain the Hierarchy presentation
ed.). Pearson
Memory Hierarchy: Education.
Locality and Cache, Class
Performance Internal and Discussion
External

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

Introduced CPU OS Memory CPU-OS Simulator –

Simulator CPU, OS Simulation for
Laboratory Computer Education.
activity: (n.d.). Retrieved
October 3, 2022, from
Introduced
https://teach-sim.com/
basic CPU
instruction
And
familiarization
with the
simulator

 FIRST Week 5 Preliminary

MONTHLY Examination
EXAMINATION
 Explain Instruction CO1 C/A Machine Week 6, Discussion, Students
Set and Assembly Instruction 7 Recitation, presented a Stallings, W. (2019).
Language Characteristics (10hrs) Group prerecorded Computer Organization
 Demonstrate Basic Assembly reporting group and Architecture
instruction Sets: Language presentation Designing for
Performance (11th
Addressing mode Instruction Lab: Basic
ed.). Pearson
and Formats Formats Assembly Class
Education.
Language Discussion
Types of Programming CPU-OS Simulator –
 Lab: Demonstrate Operation Students will CPU, OS Simulation for
program creation  Data Data transfer compose an Computer Education.
and logic transfer and instructional (n.d.). Retrieved
 Arithmetic Arithmetic code that will October 3, 2022, from
Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

formulation using  Logical write a value to https://teach-

data transfer and  I/O a specific sim.com/
arithmetic register and
apply basic
arithmetic.

 Arithmetic and CO1 C/A Number Week 8,9 Discussion, Students Stallings, W. (2019).
Logic System, (10hrs) Recitation, presented a Computer Organization
Number System Conversion Group prerecorded and Architecture
and Computer Computer reporting group Designing for
Performance (11th
Arithmetic Arithmetic presentation
ed.). Pearson
Digital Logic Lab: Basic
Education.
Digital Logic Assembly Class
 Lab: Demonstrate Lab: Language Discussion CPU-OS Simulator –
Datapath - Control Programming CPU, OS Simulation for
Arithmetic Logic transfer, Jump Students will Computer Education.
Unit logical test Control compose an (n.d.). Retrieved
Implementation: transfer, instructional October 3, 2022, from
Loops Arithmetic code that
 using jumps and demonstrate
instructions and Comparison the control
stack operation transfer,
arithmetic
using Jump
condition
Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

 MIDTERM Week 10
EXAMINATION

 Discuss Parallel CO1, C/A Multiple Week Discussion, Students Stallings, W. (2019).
Processing CO2 Processor 11,12 Recitation, presented a Computer Organization
Organization (10hrs) Group prerecorded and Architecture
 Explain reporting group Designing for
Performance (11th
Multiprocessor presentation
ed.). Pearson
Organization Symmetric Lab: Basic
Education.
Multiprocesso Assembly Class
r Language Discussion CPU-OS Simulator CPU,
 Discuss Symmetric Programming OS Simulation for
Multiprocessor Lab: Students Computer Education.
will compose (n.d.). Retrieved
 Describe an instructional October 3, 2022, from
Multithreading and code that will https://teach-
Chip demonstrate sim.com/
Multiprocessor direct and
Ledin, Jim. (2020).
indirect
Modern Computer
addressing,
Architecture and
 Lab: Demonstrate subroutine and Organization: Learn
instruction and pass parameter processor architecture
data for direct and . including RISC-V, and
indirect design of PCs, cloud
addressing, servers, and
smartphones. Packt
Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

subroutine and Publishing.

pass parameter

CO1, C/A Digital logic Week Discussion, Students Stallings, W. (2019).

Digital Logic CO2 and Boolean 13-14 Recitation, presented a Computer Organization
and Architecture
 Boolean Operators operator (10hrs) Group prerecorded Designing for
reporting group Performance (11th
Lab: Assembly presentation ed.). Pearson
Language Lab: Basic Education.
Programming to Assembly Class
CPU-OS Simulator – CPU,
demonstrate Boolean Language Discussion OS Simulation for
Programming Computer Education.
Lab: Students (n.d.). Retrieved
will compose October 3, 2022, from
an instructional https://teach-sim.com/
code that will Ledin, Jim. (2020).
demonstrate Modern Computer
direct and Architecture and
indirect Organization: Learn
addressing, processor
architecture including
subroutine and RISC-V, and design of
pass parameter PCs, cloud servers,
and smartphones.
Packt Publishing.

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

 Logic gates, latches CO1, C/A Gates Week Discussion, Students M. Morris Mano.
and flip flops CO3 11-12, 13 Recitation answer online (2017). Digital Logic
(5hrs) quiz to assess and Computer
Simulator their Design. Pearson
Demo understanding India.
of the lesson.
Stallings, W. (2019).
Lab: Students Computer
will compose Organization and
an a Architecture
connection of Designing for
components Performance (11th
that will ed.). Pearson
demonstrate Education.
logic gates,
latches and
flipflops

 SECOND Week 14 Semi- Final

MONTHLY Examination
EXAMINATION

 Differentiate RISC CO1C C/A Alternative Week 15 Discussion, Students Stallings, W. (2019).
from CISC O3 Architectures (5hrs) Recitation answer online Computer
architecture quiz to assess Organization and

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

 Design their Architecture

multiprocessor understanding Designing for
systems of the lesson. Performance (11th
ed.). Pearson
Education.

 Request-Level CO1C C/A Request-Level Week 16 Discussion, Students Stallings, W. (2019).

and Data-Level O3 and Data-Level (5hrs) Recitation, answer online Computer
Parallelism Parallelism Library/ quiz to assess Organization and
Research their Architecture
Work understanding Designing for
of the lesson. Performance (11th
ed.). Pearson
Students Education.
design
computer CPU-OS Simulator
based on given CPU, OS Simulation
requirements. for Computer
Education. (n.d.).
Retrieved October
3, 2022, from
https://teach-
sim.com/

Ledin, Jim. (2020).

Modern Computer
Architecture and
Organization: Learn
Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

processor
architecture
including RISC-V, and
design of PCs, cloud
 Domain-Specific CO1, C/A Deep Neural Week 17 Discussion, Students Stallings, W. (2019).
Architectures CO3 Networks (5hrs) Recitation answer online Computer
Google’s quiz to assess Organization and
Tensor their Architecture
Processing understanding Designing for
Unit, an of the lesson. Performance (11th
Inference Data ed.). Pearson
Center Education.
Accelerator
Microsoft
Catapult, a Ledin, Jim. (2020).
Flexible Data Modern Computer
Center Architecture and
Accelerator Organization: Learn
Intel Crest, a processor
Data Center architecture
Accelerator for including RISC-V, and
Training design of PCs, cloud
FINAL Week 18 Final
EXAMINATIO Examination
N

9. Final Course Requirement

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

As evidence of attaining the course outcomes stated, student-learners are required to submit the following requirement
during the indicated dates of the term:

Course Outcomes Required Output TARGET

Submission
CO1. Recommend appropriate operating Research Work Week 18
system based on given system
requirements.
CO2. Plan and write a simple assembly Assembly Codes Week 10
language program
CO3. Perform cost-benefit analysis for a Research Work Week 18
proposed server solution.

20. Assessment and Grading System

Using the grading system stipulated in the Student Handbook, the grades will be computed as follows:

Lecture Component Laboratory Component

20% Written Works 20% Written Works
60% Performance Tasks 60% Performance Tasks
20% Major Exams 20% Major Exams

Final Grade = 40% Midterm Grade + 60% Finals Grade

Passing Grade: 75%

Passing Grade Conditions: Student has successfully submitted all the requirements and attended the class regularly.

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

GRADING RUBRIC FOR RESEARCH WORK/PRINTED REPORT

CRITERIA EXEMPLARY(4) SATISFACTORY(3) DEVELOPING(2) UNSATISFACTORY(1)

Organization Ideas are arranged Ideas are arranged Ideas are somewhat Ideas are not arranged
logically and support the logically but sometimes arranged logically and logically and fail support
subject matter; very easy fail to support the sometimes support the the subject matter;
to follow; very effective. subject matter; easy to subject matter; difficult to follow;
follow; effective. somehow easy to follow; ineffective.
ineffective.
Content Main idea or subject Main idea or subject Main idea or subject Main idea or subject
matter is clearly defined. matter is somewhat matter is too vague or matter is undefined.
Evidences or examples defined. Evidences or too broad. Evidences or Evidences or examples
are vivid and specific. examples are good and examples are slightly are mostly irrelevant.
relevant, but are general. good and relevant.
Grammar and There are no grammar or Only one or two errors in More than two errors in Errors in grammar and
Spelling spelling errors. grammar and spelling. grammar and spelling. spelling are very
frequent.
Vocabulary Has a wide vocabulary Has a good vocabulary Has an ordinary Has a limited vocabulary
rage and effective word range and word usage. vocabulary range and range and word usage is
usage. some errors in word inaccurate.
usage.
Citations Bibliography/works cited Bibliography/works cited Bibliography/works cited Student does not list

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

list is properly formatted list is complete, but not list is incomplete (e.g. no sources used for
and complete properly formatted (e.g. citations for images) or research.
bulleted list). improperly formatted
(e.g. list of URLs).

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

GRADING RUBRIC FOR ASSEMBLY PROGRAMMING

CRITERIA STRONG (4) ADEQUATE(3) PARTIAL(2) INADEQUATE(1)

Specifications The program works and The program works and The program works and The program does not
meets all of the meets most of the meets some of the work.
specifications. specifications. specifications.

Readability The code is well The code is fairly easy The code is readable The code is very difficult
organized and very easy to follow. but by someone from to read.
to follow. the IT community.

Reusability The code is well- Most of the code could Some parts of the code The code is poorly
organized could be be reused in other could be reused in organized and could not
reused as a whole. programs. other programs. be reused.

Efficiency The code is efficient The code is fairly The code is slightly The code is
without sacrificing efficient without organized and disorganized and
readability and sacrificing readability unnecessarily long. unnecessarily long.
usability. and usability.

Documentation The code is well- The code is mostly The code lacks The code is not
commented to make commented to make comments to make commented.
the reader understand normal people better normal people better
the topic. understand the topic. understand the topic.

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

GRADING RUBRIC FOR HANDS-ON EXERCISES (LAN CABLE AND ROUTING TABLE)

Score Description
10 Student completed all assigned tasks without error
7–9 Student completed all assigned tasks with some errors

4–6 Student completed some assigned tasks with less errors

1–3 Student completed some assigned tasks with errors
0 Student shows no response/task not attempted

21. Course References

A. Books
 Kusswurm, D. (2020). Modern Arm Assembly Language Programming. In Modern Arm Assembly Language Programming.
Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-6267-2
 Stallings, W. (2019). Computer Organization and Architecture Designing for Performance (11th ed.). Pearson Education.
 M. Morris Mano. (2017). Digital Logic and Computer Design. Pearson India.
 John L. Hennessy, D. A. P. (2019). Computer Architecture, Sixth Edition: A Quantitative Approach enhanced.
 CPU-OS Simulator CPU, OS Simulation for Computer Education. (n.d.). Retrieved October 3, 2022, from https://teach-
sim.com/

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021
 F – ACAD - 29

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

Mr. Aldwin Sumalabe

_____________________ _________________________ _______________________
Faculty Department Head Dean/ Director

_________________________ _______________________
Librarian VP-Academic Affairs

Revision No.5 Issue Date: January 04, 2021 Revision Date: January 04, 2021