Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intimation To Police
Intimation To Police
Date: 28.10.2013
To,
Sir,
Yours truly,
Encl.: As above.
Mumbai-400 052. )
property.
2. The Plaintiff states that the facts will remain that the
defendant No.1 has filed the suit in the Hon’ble High Court of
well as other properties and have admitted that the suit property is
High Court Suit (L) No.2655 of 2012 filed by the defendant No.1
in the month of October, 2012 and after riling the said Suit (L)
4
Motion for urgent reliefs being Notice of Motion (L) No.3225 for
2013 in Suit (L) No.2655 of 2012 and hereto annexed and marked
aforesaid High Court suit, the defendant No.1 has executed 2 gift
thereby gifted the suit property to the defendant No.2 during the
pendency of the said High Court Suit without disclosing the said
facts in the said purported gift deeds dated 30.4.2013 and hereto
annexed and marked Exhibit “D” is a copy of the gift deed dated
annexed and marked Exhibit “E” is a copy of the gift deed dated
remain, that the defendants have suppressed the true and material
facts and behind the back of the plaintiff, the defendants have got
executed two gift deeds both dated 30.4.2013 during the pendency
of the High Court Suit without mentioning therein that the matter
Judicature at Bombay.
5
socalled gift deeds dated 30.4.2013 are illegal, bad in law, void ab
said gift deeds dated 30.4.2013 are only on the paper and in fact
the possession of the suit property is always with the plaintiff and
neither the defendant No.1 nor the defendant No.2 or any one of
them are not in use, occupation and possession of the suit property
5.10.2001.
property and the said license is also renewed from time to time
upto date and hereto annexed and marked Exhibit “G” is a copy
11. The Plaintiff states ad submits that the plaintiff has also
hereto annexed and marked Exhibit “H” is copy of the Shops &
12. The Plaintiff states and submits that the Plaintiff has also
in respect of the suit property from time to time and paid upto date
copies of the property tax paid bills for the Academic year 2004-
upon other various property tax paid bills as and when produced.
14. The plaintiff states and submits that since the defendant
attack and his left organ of the body is paralyzed and he is bed
ridden and unable to move from one place to other and the
plaintiff being his only son is looking after the defendant No.1 as
two times bread and butter, medicines etc.. The Plaintiff states and
submits that the defendant No.2 and her husband Tarvinder Singh
Keer, both are having bad eye on the plaintiff’s property and
behind the back of the plaintiff, the defendants got executed both
suit property in order to grab the suit property. The Plaintiff states
the plaintiff has never handed over the suit property either to the
possession of the suit property was given by the plaintiff nor the
the defendant No.1 in the High Court Suit (L) No.2655 of 2012.
15. The Plaintiff states that the suit property is only source
since the year 2003 till date without any interruption either by
persons.
respect of the suit property which is the subject matter of the High
but, to challenge the said purported socalled both the gift deeds
9
and taken into safe custody of this Hon’ble Court for cancellation
both the socalled purported gift deeds dated 30.4.2013 are illegal,
bad in law, void ab initio and the same is not binding upon the
not binding upon the plaintiff as well as to the Suit Property viz.
and same may be impounded and taken into safe custody of this
Hon’ble Court for its cancellation and the same may be cancelled.
the socalled purported both gift deeds i.e. Gift Deed dated
2013 against the plaintiff in respect of the suit property viz. Hotel
Mira Bhayandar Nagar Palika along with shed for Restaurant and
11
the records, licenses and the suit property pursuant to the socalled
purported both gift deeds i.e. Gift Deed dated 30.4.2013 bearing
18. The Plaintiff states that the plaintiff is also entitled for
before this Hon’ble Court and same may be impounded and taken
into safe custody of this Hon’ble Court for cancellation and the
aforesaid terms pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit.
21. The Plaintiff states that, if the reliefs as prayed for is not
and paid the Court fees accordingly, for the purpose of Court fees
22. The plaintiff has not received any copy of the caveat and/or
23. The Plaintiff will rely upon the documents a list whereof is
annexed hereto.
meters approximately;
approximately;
meters approximately;
(e) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit the
(f) That pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit,
approximately;
(i) Such other and further reliefs looking the nature and
VERIFICATION
Plaintiff
Identified by me
Before me