Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jcad 15 3 48
Jcad 15 3 48
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy of a hydrolyzed collagen supplement (Lapi Gelatine, Empoli, Italy) for improving skin moisturization
and elasticity as well as the appearance of wrinkles. METHODS: A monocentric, randomized, controlled study was performed; the study included 52
volunteers who were divided into two groups. Twenty-six subjects took the collagen supplement and the other 26 participants received maltodextrin
for a period of 56 days. Skin moisturization, skin elasticity, and wrinkle depth were instrumentally evaluated. Clinical parameters, including skin
softness, skin firmness, skin smoothness, and the visibility of wrinkles were subjectively evaluated by a dermatologist. Finally, the gastrointestinal
tolerability was evaluated during the period of treatment. RESULTS: Improvements in skin moisturization, skin elasticity and wrinkle depth were
measured in the participants taking the hydrolyzed collagen after 28 days. In all enrolled participants, the results of the analysis of variance showed
a statistically significant effect of the interaction between product and time. The evolution over time of the investigated parameters was significantly
different between the participants taking the hydrolyzed collagen and the participants taking the maltodextrin. Furthermore, it was well tolerated
and no adverse effects were recorded. KEYWORDS: Wrinkles, skin elasticity, skin moisturization, hydrolyzed collagen
Collagen synthesis changes as we age: younger skin comprises mechanism of action: 1) free amino acids contribute to the formation
80-percent Type I collagen and about 15-percent Type III collagen. of collagen and elastin fibers; and 2) collagen oligopetides stimulate
With age, collagen fibers become thicker and shorter; consequently, the production of new collagen, elastin and hyaluronic acid.6
Type I collagen is lost. In addition, with advancing age there is also a The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has
loss of hyaluronic acid. These factors contribute to the appearance of classified gelatin, from which collagen peptides are prepared, as a
skin aging, with a reduction in its elasticity and tone, giving way to the safe substance. Furthermore, based on the results of international
increased appearance of wrinkles, sagging eyelids, and bags under the research,6,8 both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the
eyes.1,2 European Commission for Health and Consumer Protection have stated
Recently, researchers have devoted some attention to protein that hydrolyzed collagen is safe. Minor side effects, such as nausea,
hydrolyzates as dietary supplements with the potential to improve flatulence, or dyspepsia can occur in some people ingesting collagen
signs of skin aging. Collagen peptides are the product of the peptides.
enzymolysis of collagen or gelatin and are used as important active Many studies have already been performed to evaluate the effect
components due to their various bioactivity, high bioavailability, of hydrolyzed collagen in improving the appearance and properties of
and good biocompatibility.3–5 Hydrolyzed collagen consists of small the skin,9,10 but more clinical studies are needed to better investigate
peptides with a low molecular weight (0.3–8 kDa). Due to its low the benefits of hydrolyzed collagen on the skin. Here, we report results
molecular weight, hydrolyzed collagen is easily digested, absorbed, from a monocentric, randomized, controlled study evaluating the
and distributed in the human body.6 The quality of the final hydrolyzed efficacy of a hydrolyzed collagen supplement (Lapi Gelatine, Empoli,
collagen depends on its average molecular size, which can vary Italy) for the improvement of hydration, elasticity, and the appearance
according to the method used to extract it.6 of wrinkles.
Once administered orally, the collagen peptides and free amino
acids are then distributed into the dermis, where they can remain METHODS
for up to 14 days.7 In the dermis, hydrolyzed collagen exerts a dual A randomized controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of a
FUNDING: Funding for this study was provided by Lapi Gelatine S.p.a.
DISCLOSURES: The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.
CORRESPONDENCE: Gaetana Rizzi, MS; Email: gaetana.rizzi@biobasiceurope.it
JCAD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY March 2022 • Volume 15 • Number 3
48
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
TABLE 1. Clinical evaluation parameters TABLE 2. Results of clinical evaluation of skin softness, skin firmness, skin smoothness, and visibility of wrinkles in
Gastrointestinal adverse effects Score the group with hydrolyzed gelatin treatment: statistically significant percentages of improved subjects from T0 to
Absent 0 subsequent times, T28 and T56.
Very slight 1 PERCENT OF IMPROVED SUBJECTS
CLINICAL EVALUATION
Slight 2 T28, % (N) T56, % (N)
Moderate 3 Skin softness 35% (9) 54% (14)
Evident 4 Skin firmness 27% (7) 58% (15)
Skin softness/firmness/smoothness Score Skin smoothness 27% (7) 46% (12)
Insufficient 1 Wrinkles visibility - 38% (10)
Sufficient 2
Fairly good 3 format) occurred once a day in the morning, other, which project the light from transmitter
during or immediately after breakfast, to receptor. The light intensity varies due
Good 4
respecting the following proportion: 1g per to the penetration depth of the skin. The
Very good 5
10kg of body weight, dissolved in water; for resistance of the skin to the negative pressure
Visibility of wrinkles Score the second month, the dose to be taken was (firmness) and its ability to return into its
Absent 1 5g in total, dissolved in water. original position (elasticity) are displayed as
Slight 2 Instrumental evaluation of skin curves (penetration depth in mm/time) in real
Moderate 3 parameters. At the beginning and time during the measurement. As showed
Evident 4 throughout the entire study period at selected in Figure 1, in the first part of the suction
Very evident 5 timepoints (after 28 days and 56 days of phase (red arrow), skin enters the probe
treatment), instrumental evaluations of skin immediately and straight (green arrow). This
hydrolyzed collagen supplement was moisturization, skin elasticity, and wrinkle is the immediate elastic deformation and
conducted in 2020 at Dermo-Cosmetic and depth, as well as clinical evaluation of in the literature is described as Ue. In the
Medical R&D Center of Bio Basic Europe in gastrointestinal tolerability, skin softness, skin second part of the suction phase, skin “creeps”
Milan, Italy. All subjects provided a written firmness, skin smoothness, and visibility of into the probe (purple arrow). This part
informed consent prior to enrollment into the wrinkles were performed. represents the viscoelastic suction part Uv.
study. The trial was run in accordance with the Skin moisturization. Skin moisturization The more elastic a material, the smaller Uv.
Declaration of Helsinki and with principles of was measured using CORNEOMETER® CM The maximum penetration after the suction
Good Clinical Practices; it was conducted with 825 (Courage and Khazaka, Koln, Germany). time can be seen with black arrow (Uf). The
a double-blind procedure: the volunteers, the Corneometer measures the electric second part is the relaxation phase (light
dermatologist, and the operators involved in capacity of the skin surface that is related green arrow). With a viscoelastic material,
the conduction of the study were unaware to skin moisture. Electric capacity and the such as skin, the complete relaxation (Ua,
of the type of products (hydrolyzed collagen conductance of biological tissue change blue arrow) can again be divided into two
or maltodextrin), which were identical in according to the water content, and they parts: the immediate elastic return Ur (orange
packaging, labels, appearance, and method increase as the water content increases. arrow) and the flat, visco-elastic part Ua–Ur.
of use. This instrument translates the electrical Uf–Ua shows the overall ability of the skin of
Healthy female subjects (N=52), aged 40 to parameters in moisturization units (scale: returning into its original shape.
60 years, were selected for the investigation 0÷130). Elasticity=R2=Ua/Uf = portion between
and divided into two groups: 26 subjects took Skin elasticity. Skin elasticity was measured the max amplitude and the ability of
the hydrolyzed collagen supplement and 26 using CUTOMETER® MPA 580 (Courage and returning to the original position (blue
took the control treatment, maltodextrin, for a Khazaka, Koln, Germany). The Cutometer distance/black distance - gross elasticity).
period of 56 days. Following a baseline clinical measures elasticity of the upper skin layer The closer the value is to 1 (100 %) the more
visit, patients with low skin elasticity and with using negative pressure, which deforms the elastic the curve.
face wrinkles were included into the study. skin mechanically. The measuring principle Wrinkle depth. Wrinkle depth
Volunteers were excluded from the study in is based on the suction method. Negative measurements were taken by using Antera
instances of known allergies to collagen or pressure is created in the device and the 3D® (Miravex Limited, Dublin, Ireland).
maltodextrin. Pregnant and/or breastfeeding skin is drawn into the aperture of the probe, Images of areas of the face of study
volunteers were also excluded. Participants and after a defined time, the skin is released participants were taken with Antera 3D® and
were required to not change their usual daily again. Inside the probe, the penetration analysis were performed using the software
routine. depth is determined by a non-contact optical Antera 3D®. The Antera 3D software measures
Administration protocol. For the first measuring system. This optical measuring a set of parameters related to lines expression,
month of the study period, the intake of either system consists of a light source and a light wrinkles, and folds (characteristics of the
the collagen or the maltodextrin (in granular receptor, as well as two prisms facing each skin which are deep-set in comparison to the
JCAD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY March 2022 • Volume 15 • Number 3
49
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
RESULTS
The study included 52 subjects with
low skin elasticity and presence of face
wrinkles and all participants who were
enrolled successfully completed the study.
Improvements in skin moisturization, skin
elasticity, and wrinkle depth were measured
FIGURE 2. Long-term skin moisturization evaluated by Corneometer, reported as mean measured throughout the study, in the participants taking the hydrolyzed
from T0 to T56. (Two-way mixed-design ANOVA).
collagen after 28 days. In all participants, the
results of the analysis of variance showed a
normal skin surface). Depth measures are the Statistical evaluation. The sample statistically significant effect of the interaction
average depth of the selected wrinkle and are data of the quantitative endpoints were between product and time. The evolution
expressed in millimeters. described using the usual measures of over time of the investigated parameters
Clinical evaluation. Clinical evaluations position and dispersion: mean and standard was significantly different between the
were performed through visual assessment by deviation. The normality of the quantitative participants taking the hydrolyzed collagen
a dermatologist and the results were recorded endpoint variables was verified with the and the participants taking the maltodextrin.
according to a specific scoring system for each Shapiro–Wilk test. The homogeneity of the Moisturization measurements. The
clinic parameter. Parameters used to evaluate variances of the endpoint variables in the hydration index of the participants taking
gastrointestinal tolerability, skin softness, skin comparison groups was assessed with the the hydrolyzed collagen increased from T28
firmness, skin smoothness, and visibility of Levene test. In addition, the independence until the end of the treatment. The mean
wrinkles and their scoring system are reported of errors was verified. For each quantitative skin moisturization index was 50.0±8.7 at
in Table 1. endpoint a mixed model of analysis of T0 and increased to 55.1±7.8 and 56.8±8.2
JCAD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY March 2022 • Volume 15 • Number 3
50
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
JCAD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY March 2022 • Volume 15 • Number 3
51
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
JCAD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC DERMATOLOGY March 2022 • Volume 15 • Number 3
52