Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Risk Management
Risk Management
MANAGEMENT]
[A report on risk management including a case study of Tesla Inc. - Navigating Risks in the
Electric Vehicle Revolution]
Strategic Risk
Strategic risk emerges when a business deviates from its established business model or plan.
This deviation undermines the effectiveness of the company's strategy over time, impeding
achievement of defined goals. For instance, consider ABC Store, a large retail outlet that
positions itself as a low-cost provider for working-class customers, with XYZ Store as its chief
rival catering more to middle-class consumers. However, if XYZ Store decides to undercut
ABC's pricing strategy, this becomes an existential threat for ABC and poses significant
strategic risk.
Compliance Risk
The second type of business peril is compliance risk, also referred to as regulatory risk.
Regulatory risk primarily emerges in industries and sectors that are subject to extensive
regulations. For instance, the wine industry operates under a three-tier system of
distribution in which wholesalers must sell wine to retailers who then vend it to consumers
in the U.S., thereby prohibiting wineries from selling their products directly to retail stores in
certain states. Nevertheless, there are several U.S. states where this kind of distribution
system does not exist; compliance risk arises when a brand fails to comprehend the specific
requirements of the state where it conducts its operations. In such circumstances, a brand
runs the danger of being non-compliant with state-specific distribution laws and may face
fines or other legal repercussions.
Operational Risk
The third category of risk facing businesses is operational in nature, emanating from within
the organization itself. This type of risk materializes when a company's daily operations fail
to meet expectations. To illustrate this point, consider HSBC - an international banking
institution that faced significant operational risks in 2012 resulting in a substantial fine
imposed by the U.S Department of Justice due to its internal anti-money laundering team
failing to effectively prevent such illegal activities in Mexico.
Reputational Risk
Whenever a corporation's image is tarnished, be it due to a past business risk or an
unrelated incident, it faces the peril of losing its clientele and experiencing a decline in brand
loyalty. HSBC's standing suffered greatly following the imposition of a fine for inadequate
anti-money laundering protocols.
Types of Risk Management
The realm of risk management is intricate and extensive, encompassing a wide range of
scenarios that necessitate varying management techniques. The four principal types of risk
management include Risk Avoidance, Risk Reduction, Risk Transfer, and Risk Retention. Each
technique boasts its own merits and demerits; thus, it is crucial for businesses to
comprehend which method is best suited for each specific risk assessment.
Risk Avoidance entails withdrawing from a hazardous situation or opting not to participate in
it altogether. This technique can prove effective when the potential risks outweigh the
prospective benefits of engaging in an activity. However, it may also entail forfeiting
opportunities that could be valuable to the business.
Risk Reduction involves taking measures to maintain risks at an acceptable level while
minimizing any losses' severity that may occur. Such steps can involve implementing safety
protocols or contingency plans or merely being prepared to respond quickly if something
goes awry.
Risk Transfer entails sharing the danger with another party by obtaining insurance coverage
or outsourcing certain activities to a third-party provider. This approach helps reduce any
financial impact resulting from possible losses.
Lastly, Risk Retention involves accepting the hazards associated with particular activities and
accounting for them within budgeting and planning processes. This method can be
advantageous when other options are unavailable or when prospective benefits outweigh
potential risks.
In addition to these four risk management techniques mentioned above, companies must
also consider their overall appetite for risk as well as their tolerance levels continually; they
should review these elements regularly and adjust them accordingly based on changes in
their financial position or external factors such as market conditions or regulatory
requirements.
By comprehending these different types of risk management approaches along with how
they correspond with specific business needs effectively enables companies to manage
dangers efficiently while ensuring they remain adequately prepared for whatever challenges
come their way within today's complex global marketplace.
1. Risk Avoidance
There are four elements to avoid contract risk that emerge subsequent to the determination
of high-risk associated with a given contract.
Refusal of Proposal – Should due diligence reveal an excessively high level of risk during the
initial stages of a contract's life cycle, the company will simply decline the proposed
agreement.
Renegotiation – As risks evolve throughout a contract's life cycle, opportunities may arise for
review and renegotiation in order to introduce new conditions aimed at avoiding further
risk.
Non-Renewal – At the conclusion of an initial contract period, businesses may opt not to
renew if estimated levels of risk are deemed too high.
Cancellation – In cases where circumstances result in increased levels of unacceptable risk
beyond agreed-upon renewal timeframes during a contract's life cycle, cancellation clauses
may be enacted.
2. Risk Reduction
An efficient contract lifecycle management system diminishes the possibility of contract risk
during its initial stages. Renegotiation at later contract life cycle phases, particularly at the
renewal stage, can effectively reduce contract risk and minimize loss. This approach should
always aim to mitigate risks. Standardization is crucial in reducing contract risk as it involves
creating a repository of standardized terms, conditions, and clauses that ensures a unified
approach by all personnel involved in authoring contracts. It also enables teams to draft
contracts with confidence knowing that legal language has been pre-approved and aligns
with the acceptable business risk profile.
3. Risk Transfer
The mitigation of contract risk in contract management can be achieved by means of a
meticulous assessment of third-party entities, followed by the delegation of certain aspects
of operations to an external company. This approach is highly advantageous for both
manufacturing and service-oriented businesses.
4. Risk Retention
Since there is risk involved in any contract, whether it be signed, renegotiated, or renewed,
there is an element of risk retention involved. The firm must account for contract risk
retention in all active contracts through risk assessment procedures, risk management
planning, and routine evaluations of the risk appetite and tolerance framework.
Commercial companies convey their safety to third parties by integrating the four forms of
risk management into their regular best practices. Both suppliers and customers are
included in this. The company gains from customer loyalty and repeat business when
organizations and individuals understand that their interests are top concern.
The Risk Management Process
That's all it is: a continuous process of risk identification, treatment, and management.
Establishing and carrying out a risk management procedure is similar to installing a fire
alarm: you hope it doesn't go off, but you're prepared to bear the small inconvenience now
in exchange for future protection.
There are several advantages to identifying and monitoring potential risks in a project. These
advantages include:
I. More effective resource allocation through the disclosure of previously hidden
expenses.
II. Improved monitoring of project expenses and more precise returns on investment
projections.
III. A greater understanding of the requirements set forth by law.
IV. Improved protection against diseases and physical harm.
V. Adaptability when changes or difficulties do occur, as opposed to fear.
Once your team identifies potential problems, it's time to delve deeper. How likely are these
issues to happen? And if they do, what will be the consequences? How will your team
respond?
In this step, your team will estimate the chance and impact of each problem to decide where
to focus first. Then, you'll determine a plan for dealing with each problem. Factors like
potential financial loss, time lost, and how severe the impact might be all play a part in
accurately analyzing each problem. By closely examining each problem, you'll also discover
any common issues across the project and improve the process for handling risks in future
projects.
When it comes to risk management failures, the usual suspects are often thought to be
deliberate misconduct, extreme recklessness, or a series of unpredictable unfortunate
events. However, a closer look at common risk management failures reveals that more often
than not, these mishaps result from avoidable missteps and a relentless pursuit of profits. To
navigate the pitfalls, it's essential to be aware of the mistakes that can compromise effective
risk management. Whether it's overlooking key risk indicators, underestimating potential
threats, or succumbing to the temptation of prioritizing short-term gains over long-term
stability, recognizing and steering clear of these pitfalls is crucial. In essence, successful risk
management requires a proactive approach that addresses potential missteps and prioritizes
the long-term health and resilience of the organization.
Examples:
1. The convoluted saga of Citibank's inadvertent payment of a $900 million loan, using its
own funds, to Revlon's lenders in 2020, when only a minimal interest payment was due,
serves as a stark illustration of how even the largest global banks can falter in risk
management. Despite having updated policies for pandemic work conditions and multiple
controls in place, Citibank's colossal blunder showcased that errors can still occur. A federal
judge attributed the mishap to poor governance, although an appeals court later overturned
the ruling regarding the bank's entitlement to refunds from the lenders. Nevertheless, in the
aftermath of the erroneous payment, Citibank faced a $400 million fine from U.S. regulators
for "longstanding" governance failures. As part of its response, the bank committed to a
comprehensive overhaul of its internal risk management, data governance, and compliance
controls. This incident underscores the critical importance of robust risk management
practices, even within institutions of substantial size and stature.
2. The scandal surrounding the New York governor's office under reporting corona virus-
related deaths at nursing homes in the state throughout 2020 and 2021 highlights a
prevalent risk management failure. Concealing data, insufficient data, and
compartmentalized data, whether intentional or unintentional, can lead to transparency
issues. To prevent such problems, organizations need a comprehensive enterprise-wide risk
management strategy. This strategy should include standardized risk terminology, well-
documented processes, and centralized collection and management of crucial risk data. By
adopting these measures, businesses can enhance transparency, promote accountability,
and mitigate the risk of data-related scandals.
CASE STUDY
Background:
Tesla Inc., a trailblazer in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, operates in a sector marked by
technological disruptions, regulatory challenges, and global market dynamics. As a company
at the forefront of the EV revolution, Tesla faces unique risks and opportunities that require
a robust risk management strategy to ensure sustainable growth.
Challenges:
Technological Innovation: Rapid advancements in EV technology and the need for
continuous innovation.
Market Acceptance: Consumer adoption of EVs and market competition in the automotive
sector.
Supply Chain Resilience: Dependence on a global supply chain for critical components like
batteries.
Regulatory Environment: Evolving regulations in different regions impacting manufacturing
and sales.