Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cdev2 1
Cdev2 1
Cdev2 1
COMPILATION OF OUTPUT
FOR
MARKETING MANAGEMENT
SUBMITTED BY:
GAMPONIA, CHRISTIAN PAUL C.
GABOGEN, JOYCE ANNE S.
MADERA, ZYREL JOVEN C.
VILLANUEVA, REAN ABQAESSA A.
BSCOOP1A
SUBMITTED TO:
MARGEL AIRA C. SADILI-TANGUNAN
Instructor
MODUL
E4
POST TEST
DO’S DON’T
Clearly state the purpose of the Use leading or biased questions.
questionnaire.
Use clear and concise language. Overwhelm respondents with too many
questions.
Include a mix of open-ended and closed- Include jargon or technical terms that may
ended questions. confuse respondents.
Keep the questionnaire length reasonable. Ask sensitive or personal questions without
proper justification.
Use a logical flow and order of questions. Use double-barreled questions (asking
multiple questions in one).
Provide response options that cover all Use vague or ambiguous language.
possible answers.
Ensure the questionnaire is easy to Assume respondents have certain knowledge
understand and complete. or experiences.
Test the questionnaire before distributing it Force respondents to select an answer that
to ensure clarity and effectiveness. doesn't accurately reflect their opinion.
3. Africa Mutual Insurance wants to help companies of all sizes and types
handle their retirement and insurance needs. According to previous
feedback, all business customers ―receive the same quality service and
care and the same freedom of choice regardless of size.
POST TEST
POST TEST
1.How can you relate the different models of brand equity presented in
this module? How are they similar? How are they different? Can you
construct a brand equity model that incorporates the best aspects of
each model?
Absolutely! Brands’ various models that intents to hut all possible
ways in a brand can mean to consumers. Though there many of them
some common ones are: The Aaker Model, The Keller Model and The Brand Asset
Valuator (BAV). Let us look at them briefly: the Aaker Model (translated by
David Aaker) This describes five perspectives on how customers perceive
themselves or others in relation to a product or service: connection with
oneself (self-image), similarity with oneself (social identification), affiliation
(small group), contrasting oneself with others (anti-identification),
reproduction (self-esteem maintenance) are just some among them; these
aspects relate closely to social categorization.
2.Discuss the pros and cons of the following statement: The best way
to challenge a leader is to attack its strengths versus the best way to
attack a leader is to avoid a head-on assault and to adopt a flanking
strategy.
"The best way to challenge a leader is to attack its strengths":
Pros:
Targeting a leader's strengths can directly confront their competitive
advantage and potentially weaken their position. - It allows for a direct
comparison of strengths, showcasing the challenger's unique value
proposition.
Cons:
Attacking a leader's strengths can be risky, as they may have established a
strong reputation and customer loyalty in those areas. - The leader may have
resources and capabilities to defend their strengths and respond with
countermeasures.
"The best way to attack a leader is to avoid a head-on assault and to adopt a
flanking strategy"
Pros:
A flanking strategy allows a challenger to target areas where the leader may
be less dominant or vulnerable. - It enables the challenger to differentiate
themselves and create a unique position in the market.
Cons:
A flanking strategy may require significant resources and investment to build
capabilities in new areas. - It may take longer to gain market share and
establish a strong position compared to a direct assault on the leader's
strengths.
Ultimately, the choice between attacking a leader's strengths or adopting a
flanking strategy depends on the specific market dynamics, the challenger's
resources and capabilities, and the competitive landscape. Both approaches
have their merits and risks, and the best strategy will vary based on the
circumstances and objectives of the challenger.