Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

JH P~u r"l~H~

- '
----
Q,.,S ~ ~ t't.
ADVANCED THEORETICAL PHYSICS CONFERENCE tt~tv\ t-~· Y\c~
"

AGENDA <JW1'\t..~ :f~\t. t1ot.\cl(


o~nq~ ~oe~4Al..
1. Introduction P~ Nu~" ttP.-J., 4-J Ji t-
a. Agenda
f ,.r- p~sf M-Jt.4
b. Objectives
c. Purpose At\ "+.h.~
d. Introduce attendees and describe bona fides M~ •'vt~~ ~l't.
0 ,.. f.. h 3.H •
2. Objectives
a. Explore evidence presented/available to determine if further
study is warranted.
b. If evidence from 2(a) is sufficient, is there sufficient evidence
to support an R&D (Research and Development) program?
c. If evidence from 2(b) is sufficient, what should the thrust be? - ~~~Jl
d. Develop an action plan (assumes sufficient evidence to proceed).
3. Purposes
a. Explore evidence of facts.
b. Determine quality of known evidence.
c. Determine methods to collect more information to fill gaps in
information (collection plan).
4. Presentations (Evidence)
a. Selected cases.
b. Identification of quality of evidence, gaps in evidence, potential
collection means, potential collection requirements and platforms
to be tasked.
c. Identification of other significant cases.
5. Analysis of evidence to meet stated purposes (paragraph 3)
6. Conclusions
a. Truth vs. Fiction
b. If true: (1) Friendly < INTERNAL >< KNOWN >
(2) Enemy EXTERNAL UNKNOWN
(3) Technologies supported
c. Study programs required to clarify, correlate, corraborate into
meaningful data array.
d. R&D programs needed .
7. Recommendations
a. Actions items. I
b. Report (what/to whom?)
c. What next? /
4-----~_s_> r 100
l/~
OUTLINE
l~

I HISTORY
I GOALS
I POTENTIAL PROJECTS
I SCHEDULE AND PLANS
I COST
I SECURITY
ACTIONS
( M66339

UFO HISTORY

• BIBLICAL

• SAN FRANCISCO 11FLAP11 1897 '()JR/ I if. ~

• 1947 KENNETH AR NOLD .J I: J ~

'\
\
1\lf-(y ~) e Al R FORCE I NVESTI GAT IONS INI Tl ATED

• 10,000 REPORTS , 600 UNEXPLA INED AS OF 1965 fPA. ·

• CONDON INVEST IGATION

• CONGRESSIONAL HEAR I NG

•CURRENT SIG HTI NG RATE OF lOTO 100/WK

19
M66340

CLASSIC AND nTYPICAL" SIGHTINGS

<» SOCORRO 1964

" MICHIGAN 1966 "Jl A "-f'


·r
fl( I{.)~
3 WASHINGTON 1952

((f-JJ ~ ,fi {.. rAI ~


@ MANTELL 1950
Jr
?Jr -
e LUBBOCK LIGHTS 1951 ( F '
e GI LL 1950' s flt

f -,... f --- )

@ITA IPU

• DESVERGES 1950 s 1
~ rF ][~

• VILLA BOAS 1958 ?f


+ tO J f_ KA

20
CLASSIFIED HISTORY

I OVERHEAD CORRELATIONS
I COMINT FROM SHIP
I FIVE BASE LOCATIONS
CORRELATlON WITH UNCLASSIFlED LITERATURE
I EXPECTATIONS AND DATA CONSISTENT
WHY NOW?

THE ELEPHANT CASES /


I CONDON STUDY RESULTS SINKING IN
I TODAY'S DETECTORS SHOW RESULTS
INTELLIGENCE PERSONNEL KNOW APIECE
I NO PLAN EXISTS
ALL REPORTS TELL SIMILAR STORIES
SECURITY .

I SHOULD BE COMPARTMENTED
I SHOULD INCLUDE ALL-SOURCE DATA
I SHOULD HANDLE UNCLASSIFIED INTERACTIONS
I SHOULD BE TOTALLY LEGAL

--·--r-..·----·"·-. . . -~· --------...-~-----·-- .


----·----------~---
-----~-----
POSSIBLE GOALS

• CREATE A PEACEFUL EARTH


• PREVENT WAR
• ESTABLISH
PRESERVE SOCIETAL HISTORY
COMMUNICATION
OBTAIN ASSISTANCE
• ESTABLISH EXISTENCE
• BREAK THROUGH TO 22ND CENTURY SCIENCE
OBTAIN TECHNOLOGY SPINOFFS
~

- NON-LETHAL WEAPONS
- BIOLOGICAL CONTROLS OF PROCESSES
NEW MATERIALS
- AGRITULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY JUMP
- WIDEBAND STEALTH
I DEVELOP AGRAVITY INTERACTION SYSTEM
DISCOVER "HI-TECH" <RELIABLE PARANORMAL PERFORMANCE)
PARRY SOVIET THREAT
\~
GOAL SELECTION CRITERIA

COMFORTABLE
ADVANTAGE TO UNITED STATES
INCREDULITY LOW
MAXIMUM PAYOFF TO MANKIND
EARLIEST SUCCESSFUL MILESTONE
MINIMUM RISK OF DISASTROUS FAILURE

I
VS'
PROJECT THEMES

CONSOLIDATE EXISTING DATA TO ESTABLISH "THREAT"


.._..,.._ UFO DATA BASE
- CLASSIFIED DATA BASE
- ABDUCTION DATABASE
COLLECT NEW DATA
- INSTALL SENSORS
- OVERFLIGHTS
I DEFINE SEVERAL CREDIBLE SCENARIOS
DEVELOP NEW PHYSICS THEORY
OBTAIN DIRECT CONTACT
- PHYSICAL
- PSYCHICAL) OR PSI
SELECTION CRITERIA
\~
AGOOD PLAN WILL I I I

SATISFY PRIME GOAL AND SEVERAL OTHERS


MAXIMIZE SUCCESS PROBABILITY
HAVE AIRTIGHT SECURITY
PROVIDE HOOKS FOR MANAGEMENT REVIEW
PROVIDE PARALLEL PATHS
INVOLVE MANY FOR SYNERGISM
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF CONVENTIONAL GOOD PLANNING
METHODS

,· ·:
~~e~
E{J.4 t...,ll AT,. u.~ fJ A-rfi

. ...<v-v
G\; ~
~'e
, ~1
<..:v
(:.~
~, h)" /~~"1~ ~~qyH
.. ~/.'!
.- ~~
,

\ti
11- ,\if
s~""
/~ .tl'..
\Y i
r;.t

_r i ~ ~ :J ) f ,, (
· 6 ri J f

3 k 1-1:_ I ti A-1 b '.j


- I
,~l 1:; 1 I~
g 11, II ~ ,c l'l- 'VI 1- 1 J Jo I

~j .Ii -s .b 11!1:-i.. lo 1--J ,,.7 .1i 0 _1u / i43 1 ~-

.[~ . ;; l:i.4 ~
~--

I -·II-'--'--!'

l"/B
I I

• -p.lf4!f I ~ ~ v Jt •4/- 'g 11 7


1

f I 1b t ~ 1 .? ,1.. lf i;- 1- 4 r, 0 11[ J- '\ l

I
l ! 5l.lbi3 11 (f
l It
i'~ f 1 ·+ ,
7 '.l-1
~
I • lb/ , ~/§t 1-- <. -

II
f -
1711S~-

\ 0 Dr PL" r /)t_Ji:((';J06<,S /J l~)j). // /J!Yf./11~) P/ lJ fJfl i_f ./)/~-,-~ O1J


t:J;,,., '\) ; Tc. R. SJCrJA )!,)/ 1-'"}t,,S /J<V.O I.a cfJ?•o-.J.J

- I

}fr;fir l::CJRetfA7)0 ,J [,hTJ../


~[.&_ Q_f,f ~J!.Vt.1 8,1.,.{£J"
I

• -YJ:ItJ.f c;z~tflfi'(-JJ Ckici . .r /"'() ff 1Z ff tf /J UT'y f 4


0 L aA
I f.! r"'LTS //tf/ 8€LltvA£L..R
..;E.;i/Sq_/?...S fo,1'£0 f:.-oR Tf/.Skdi'<:J

/vi 4Y/ tl',tf.tt\ r::o::;


flllC."1 /{d.J;EvL GoAL /J;Rt :::riY

Dlf.fR_
SCHEDULE & PROGRAM PLAN
CSD
MONTH
1 2 3 4 5 6

TASK 1
ANALYZE DATA
DECIDE LOCATIONS
DEPLOY
MONITOR

TASK 2
SELECT TGTS
FLIGHT
ACCESS PHOTOS Q,....---4
I
TASK 3
ESTABLISH NEED TO KNOW
INTERVIEWS
TRANSCRIBE
CONCLUSIONS
TASK 4
SELECT VIEWERS
TARGETS B I~
TRANSCRIBE
CONCLUSIONS

PREPARE lOOM PROGRAM 1---~--·_J

,_
. -;;
}~
COST

NON LABOR TOTAL


TASK -LABOR <MM/K$) CK$)
CK$)
1 DETECTOR DEPLOYMENT 200 44/440 640
2 OVERFLIGHTS 100 12/120 220
3 CLASSIFIED DATA 25 12/120 145
4 HI-TECH 100 12/120 220
1225
-
C$l ,2M)
ACTION

I INITIATE NSELECTED SOURCE PROCUREMENTS

e PLAN AMEDIA RELEASE NOW IF COVER rs BLOWN LATER

GET WORK STATEMENTS WRITTEN


BENEFITS

SEE GOALS FOR ANSWER

I (,

You might also like