Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Classical Liberal Political Economy: Context: Adam Smith and David Ricardo
Classical Liberal Political Economy: Context: Adam Smith and David Ricardo
Date @04/25/2024
Full Circle Moment: Despite not thinking about reciprocity, when more people pursue self-interest, it will
lead to the ultimate outcome of helping other people because you end up bettering the conditions of other
people as you pursue your own interests.
Analogy of the Butcher: Regardless of your reasoning (i.e. for profit or for people), you ultimately end up
helping other people and bettering conditions. (the same analogy applies to various forms of work)
ULTIMATE REALIZATION: You cannot work alone, everyone has a role to play in society.
Economic growth stems from the realization that we all collectively have a role in society.
It’s like potential energy because you used wages as a form of capital. The better the wage, the better the
labor or output.
Monopolies are likely to happen because it stagnates/ or makes people too comfortable. People are not
motivated to improve the goods they receive.
Quality of life should be improved, small population should be avoided because it means that overall
market will be affected.
Transferrable—Capital can be transferred into laborers, and so investments are not only wages
but also laborers as capital increases.
Manufacturing: initial capital (i.e. fertilizer à crops) is turned into objects (i.e. woodà furniture)
Higher economic growth = higher capital = higher investments (i.e. transportation & trade)
Distrust should be avoided as this leads to isolation à self-centeredness (=/= self-interest)à selfishness
Why minimal? Minimal in a sense that the state should not take over the law of supply and demand.
Overregulation should be avoided because it might corrupt the market.
Public Goods—anything to help the conducive atmosphere so that the free market could work
education, healthcare, public infrastructure
Income Proportionate
Non-Arbitrary
Differential Rent: quality in a land you lend (i.e. quality/ fertility of land) implies higher price of rent
Landlords—rent
Laborers—wages
Capitalist—profit
Population (increase) à Demand for goods (increase) à Need for land (increase)
Need to appease the demands of their laborers (wages) and the demands of landlords (quality of
rent)
Capitalist needs to pay high differential rent to ensure high quality land, while ensuring they pay
wages to their laborers
Tendency: Landlords are also the capitalists (no need to pay rent), causing more inequality and
abuse towards the laborers
Consumers are the real victims because the increase in rent results to increased wages, and
ultimately HIGH PRICES. Sadly, consumers buying these pricey products are also the laborers.
P = Capitalist – (R+W)
The more wages and rent you pay, the lesser and lesser the profit becomes
We’re not pursuing equality, but only hopes that equality will emerge
(Mele and Canton + Persky) Homo Economicus on their Bounded Rationality and Societal Altruism
On altruism - there are people out there who are willing to help people for the sake of helping
When you feel good about helping then you still benefited from helping
David Ricardo