Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 56

Logging Interpretation Method -

Basic Approaches

Schlumberger Private
Quicklook Log Interpretation with shaly sand formation
Objectives
 How to compute Volume of Shale?
 How to calculate porosity from log reading via formulae
or chartbook?
 How to derive shale corrected porosity via formulae or

Schlumberger Private
chartbook?
 How to perform hydrocarbon corrected porosity via
chartbook?
 How to get Rw?
 How to confirm Rw is correct?
 How to use Archie equation?
 How to estimate net sand/pay?
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale

Schlumberger Private
• shale indicators
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Log Interpretation

 Interpretation is defined as the action of explaining the


meaning of something
 Log interpretation is the explanation of logs such as ρb,

Schlumberger Private
GR, Resistivity, etc. in terms of well and reservoir
parameters, zones, porosity, oil saturation, etc.
 Log interpretation can provide answers to questions on:
 How much hydrocarbon is in these wells?
 Where is it?
 Is there communication between these reservoirs?
 What is the extent of this reservoir?
Log Interpretation (Cont.)

 Log interpretation can provide


answers to questions on:
 How will it produce?

Schlumberger Private
 Will it require enhanced
recovery techniques?
lithological
sandstone grades
to clay sediment

GAS

OIL
sandstone
WATER pinch out
What Can the Log Measurements Provide?

 Log measurements give:


 Porosity: From porosity tools
 Water Saturation: From a combination of porosity /

Schlumberger Private
lithology tools and Resistivity or Capture Cross-
Section from the TDT tool
 Thickness: From depth measurements
 Position: Markers-correlation
 Lithology: Reservoir/non-reservoir
Early Log Interpretation

 Early resistivity logs were used to find possible


producing zones

Schlumberger Private
 SP was used to define permeable beds, compute Rw
and determine shaliness

 Resistivity was used to determine “Porosity”

 Archie developed the relationship between resistivity,


porosity and saturation
Modern Log Interpretation
LQC
 Consulate the field engineer/client and check the original hardcopy
 Environmental correction (GF: PrePlus)
 Data Editing and Crossplot (GF: WellEdit and UtilityPlots)
Logs in open hole give:

Schlumberger Private
 Porosity
- Quantity, Type and Distribution
 Saturation
 Thickness
 Permeability
 Producibility
 Lithology
 Rick type, Shale content, Shale type and deposition
 Fluid Type
 Fluid Contact
 Etc.
WellSite Interpretation-Quicklook
 This is a schematic representation of the logging measurements
used and the petrophysical parameters determined for
answering the basic questions of wellsite interpretation

Density
Can ? φ Neutron

Schlumberger Private
Sonic
1. Does the formation contain Hydrocarbon?

Clean? GR Rt
SP
2. Quantity Resistivity

3. Recoverable

φ(1-Sw) Rxo
f(Rt,φ)
Qualitative Interpretation
Descriptor Measurement Functional Behavior

Clean/Shaly SP Vshale↑ → SP ↑
GR Vshale↑ → GR ↑
den/neut xplt

Schlumberger Private
Porosity(φ) Density φ↑ → ρb ↓
Neutron φ↑ → φn ↑
Sonic φ↑ → ∆t ↑
Hydrocarbon Rt Sw↑ → Rt ↓
So↑ → Rt ↑
φ ↓ → Rt ↑
Recoverable/ Rxo vs. Rt Rxo=Rt → no
invasion assuming
Moveable (shallow vs.
deep) contrasting fluids.
Rxo/Rt≠Rmf/Rw →
Moved fluid
Interpretation Procedure

Schlumberger Private
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale

Schlumberger Private
• shale indicators
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Zoning
Zoning is the first step in any interpretation procedure. During zoning,
the logs are split into intervals of:
 Porous and non-porous rock
 Permeable and non-permeable rock
 Shaly and clean rock

Schlumberger Private
 Good hole conditions and bad hole conditions
 Good logs and bad logs
Typical zoning Tools:
 SP
 GR
 Caliper
 Neutron Density
 Resistivity
 NMR
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale
• shale indicators

Schlumberger Private
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Lithology General
 The next major step in the
procedure is lithology Simple
identification. Lithology data
gives information on porosity
and other parameters

Schlumberger Private
 This is an essential step as
from the lithology comes
porosity and other parameters
Dirty
 Lithology of a formation can be
simple or ‘dirty’ or complex.
 Odd minerals can also be
present, such as micas in
sandstones or anhydrites in Complex
carbonates which complicate
the problem further
Lithology Interpretation

 The lithology can be obtained in several ways:


 From the cuttings (depth problems)
 From local knowledge (good during development)

Schlumberger Private
 From the known depositional environment (good in general basis)
 From a log Quicklook (good starting point)
 From individual log readings (difficult if there are no areas of zero
porosity)
 From crossplots (the best method)
Lithology: Logging Tools
 All tools react to lithology – usually in conjunction with the porosity
 Major lithology tools are:
 Neutron – reacts to fluid and matrix
 Density – reacts to matrix and fluid
 NOTE: Density also has the PEF curve, reliable when no barite in

Schlumberger Private
mud
- pef sand ~ 2
- pef limestone, salt, anhydrite ~5
- pef dolomite, clay ~ 3
 Sonic – reacts to a mixture of matrix and fluid, complicated by
seeing only primary porosity
 NGT- identifies shale types and special minerals (K Th, U)
 ECS – geochemical logging, identifies
- Si, Ca, Fe, S

From these sources mineralogy can be computed


Crossplots

 A “two-dimensional” way of
looking at logs
 Combines properties from both

Schlumberger Private
measurements, thus eliminating
ambiguities
 The most common crossplot is
the Density-Neutron
 Virtually any log can be plotted
against another
 A standard crossplot is a frequency
plot with points plotted as their
frequency
Crossplots

 A third dimension is added in a z-axis


plot which uses something like colour
classes or numbers to include

Schlumberger Private
another measurement

 3D plots are also routinely available


Mono-mineral Model
ρ b = ρ mf φ + ρ ma (1 − φ )
 Formation Model:
 Water-bearing, mono-mineral.
φ n = φ mf φ + φ ma (1 − φ )

Schlumberger Private
 This formation can be described by the density tool
and the neutron tool

 For limestone φnma=0. And for sand φnma=0.04


(limestone matrix)
Mono-Mineral Cross Plot

 The plot is a straight line from


the matrix point to the 100%
porosity, water point. It is

Schlumberger Private
scaled in porosity.

chart book slide


Neutron Density Cross Plots
 This crossplot has ρb
plotted against the
corrected neutron porosity
 Fluid density in this plot is
1.0 g/cm3

Schlumberger Private
 Two knowns
(RHOB, TNPH)
Porosity=28
 Can compute RHOG=2.81 gm/cc
two unknowns
(porosity, grain density)

 If two minerals present


grain density will be
volume-weighted average
of each mineral
Crossplot Interpretation: 2 Axis Plot

Hydrocarbon
and shale trends

Schlumberger Private
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale
• shale indicators

Schlumberger Private
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Shale Index: Gamma Ray

Schlumberger Private
(For paper log quicklook)
Schlumberger Private
Shale Index : SP
Schlumberger Private
Shale Index : Sonic
Shale Index : Neutron

Schlumberger Private
Shale Index : Neutron-Density

rhog min.(clean line)

A
Point ‘A’ is
~65% sand

Schlumberger Private
rhog max.(shale line)
and 35% clay,

(assuming
shaly sand
reservoir)

Shale Index
Transforming shale index to Shale Volume: Vsh

(for paper log quicklook)

Schlumberger Private
Included
for
information
only!
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale
• shale indicators

Schlumberger Private
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Clean Sand Formation Porosity:
Sonic

ΔT = (1-Φs) * ΔTma + Φs * ΔTf

Schlumberger Private
(ΔT – ΔTma) ∆t log − ∆t ma
Φs = ---------------- or φ =C
(ΔTf – ΔTma) ∆t log
For ΔTma:
Sandstone: 55.5 – 51.3 us/ft
Limestone : 47.6 – 43.5 us/ft
Dolomite : 43.5 – 38.5 us/ft
Clean Sand Formation Porosity:
Density
ρb = (1-Φd) * ρma + Φd * ρf
ρ ma − ρb
φD =

Schlumberger Private
ρ ma − ρ f

ρ
For ma:
Sandstone: 2.65 g/cc
Limestone : 2.71 g/cc
Dolomite : 2.87 g/cc
Clean Sand Formation Porosity:
Neutron Matrix Correction (Chart)

NPHI = (1-Φn) * NPHIma + Φn * NPHIf

Schlumberger Private
(NPHI – NPHIma)
Φn = ---------------- (Chart Por-13b)
(NPHIf – NPHIma)
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale
• shale indicators

Schlumberger Private
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Define Formation Factor ‘F’
(rarely used)
 Rw = resistivity of water in the pore space
 Ro = resistivity of a rock totally filled with water

Schlumberger Private
 F: Formation Factor

R0
F=
Rw
Archie Saturation Equation

Rt is proportional to water resistivity Rw

Rt is inversely proportional to water volume φ .Sw


Rt ~ Rw

Schlumberger Private
So ------
φ .Sw
Rt = a.Rw
Laboratory studies in clean formation show ------
φ m.Swn

a Rw
S
n
Re-arranging: = m
w
φ Rt ‘Archie’ equation
Archie’s Equation

Empirical constant

a Rw
(usually near unity) Resistivity of
formation water,

Sw = n

Schlumberger Private
Ω-m

φ
Water m Cementation

Rt
saturation, exponent
fraction (usually near 2)
Saturation
exponent
(also usually Resistivity of
near 2) Porosity, uninvaded
fraction formation, Ω-m
Archie Saturation Equation

 Sw – water saturation
a Rw
S
n
 a – constant (~1)
= m
 Rw – formation water w
φ Rt

Schlumberger Private
resistivity
 φ - porosity
 Undisturbed formation
resistivity
 m – ‘cementation’ exponent
(~2)
 n – ‘saturation’ exponent (~2)
Invaded Zone Saturation
 The same method can be applied to the invaded zone. The
porosity is identical, the lithology is assumed to be the same,
hence the constants a,n,m are the same

 The changes are the resistivities which are now Rxo and Rmf

Schlumberger Private
 Rmf is measured usually on surface and Rxo is measured by the
MSFL tool

 The equation is then:

n aR mf
Sxo = m
φ R xo
Alternative Saturation Determination
 Dividing for Sxo and Sw, with n set to 2 1
Sw  R xo R t 2
= 
Sxo  R mf R w 
 Observations suggest:

Schlumberger Private
1
Sxo ≈ Sw 5

 Hence 5
 R xo R t 8
Sw =  
 R mf R w 
 Providing a quick look saturation answer when the porosity is not
available
Archie Parameters

 Rw = resistivity of connate water

 m = “cementation factor”, set to 2 in the simple case,

Schlumberger Private
>2 in poorly connected moldic formation
<2 in fractured formation

 n = “saturation exponent”, set to 2 in the simple case,


higher in oil wet rocks, lower in water wet rocks

 a = constant, set to 1 in limestones, 0.8 in sandstones


Saturation Equations
 There are large number of saturation equations, such as:

1 1
Sw =  Vcl  *
 Indonesia Equation
1 −
Vcl
2

 φe Rt
Rcl
+ Rw
2
1 V φ  n

Schlumberger Private
2 1.4 m
Included
= + e
 Sw
cl
for
 Nigeria Equation
Rt  Rcl aRw  information
only!

1 Sw2 BQv Sw
 Waxman-Smiths Equation = * +
Rt F Rw F*
 Dual-Water Equation

Ct =
φ t S 
m n
wt
C +
Swb
(C − C )

a  w wb 
w
Swt
 All reduce to Archie’s equation when there is no shale
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale

Schlumberger Private
• shale indicators
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Rw Determination
• Rw from SP

• Rw from porosity and resistivity (wet zone)

Rw=(Φm)*Rt

Schlumberger Private
• Rw from resistivity only (wet zone)

Rt*Rmf
Rw = --------------
Rxo
• Rw from client (water chemical analysis)

All the Rw from different sources should be in consistent.


Rmf and Rw

•Rmf and Rw should be corrected by temperature (BHT).

Schlumberger Private
•Chart Gen-9
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale

Schlumberger Private
• shale indicators
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Por-5: Density Porosity

38 p.u in SS

Schlumberger Private
2.04 g/cc

If needed: Φdcor=Φ d –Φdsh * Vsh


Por-13b: Neutron Porosity

Schlumberger Private
12 p.u
in SS

8 p.u in LS

if needed Φncor= Φn –Φnsh * Vsh


CP-9: Hydrocarbon correction
for N-D crossplot porosity

Schlumberger Private
38 p.u

32.2p.u

Sxo=50%

12 p.u
ΔΦ= -1.6 p.u

Φ2= Φ1+ ΔΦ
Φ1=32.2 Φ2= 30.6
Hydrocarbon corrected porosity = 30.6
Shaly Sand Formation Workflow (Density-Neutron)

Φd Φn
Φdcor=Φ d –Φdsh * Vsh
Φdcorr Φdcorr correct each for shale
Φncor=Φ n –Φnsh * Vsh

Schlumberger Private
Use CP-9 Φ1 shale corrected porosity
a*Rmf
work out Shr, needed
for hydrocarbon corr.
Shr=1-Sxo Use Sxo2 = ------------
Φ12 *Rxo

CP-9 ΔΦ

1 1 Φ2=Φ1+ ΔΦ Hydrocarbon corrected porosity


Sw =  Vcl  *
1−
Vcl
2

 φe Rt
Rcl
+ Rw Sw Shale corrected saturation
Introduction
Zoning
Lithology
• crossplots
• effect of hydrocarbon
• lithology tools
Shale

Schlumberger Private
• shale indicators
Porosity
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Saturation
• clean zones
• shaly zones
Rw determination
Hydrocarbon correction
Permeability
Net sand/pay
Hydrocarbon pore volume
Permeability
 Permeability is an inherent property of the reservoir
 It is a dynamic property associated with fluid movement
 It cannot be simply related to porosity, a low porosity carbinate
may have a “high” effective permeability due to extensive
fractures

Schlumberger Private
 Formulae linking permeability and porosity have been around
for a long time
 The first, in 1927, linked porosity and grain surface area:

K= φ**3/5*Sg**2*(1-φ)**2
Usually written:
K=A* φ**3/S**2
Where φ is the porosity, S is the surface area of the grains
and A an empirical constant
Permeability Equations
 The surface area of the grains is difficult to find from logs
 The equations linking permeability to porosity employed studies
which linked the surface area to the irreducible water saturation
Swirr, such as:

Schlumberger Private
K**(1/2)= φ**2.25/Swirr

 Swirr is difficult to estimate from logs, except in a pay zone which is


producing dry hydrocarbon
 A more general equation using the volume of irreducible water
(Bvwirr= φ*Swirr) was revised:

K**(1/2)= 10000* φ**2*(φt-Bvwirr)/BVwirr


Permeability Equation (continued)

 These equations are empirical and work well in some places


 Difficulties are:

Schlumberger Private
 Shaly formation (more than 25%)
 Low permeability
 Finding the irreducible water parameter
 It is also assumed that:
 The permeability is due to intergranular, primary porosity
 The formation is water wet
 The equations are usually only applicable to sandstones as carbonate rocks
have complex poro-perm systems
Permeability and Logs
 Most tools react to permeability
 The SP is a permeability indicator, it would not exist if there
was no permeability
 The separation of shallow, medium and deep resistivity curves
indicates invasion, which can only happen in permeable

Schlumberger Private
zones
 The microlog curves react to the presence of mud cake, which
only occurs in front of permeable formations
 Some tools can be linked to the permeability in a direct
fashion
 These are sonic (Stonley wave), Geochemical and RFT/MDT
pressure tests and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. None of
these tools is a pure “permeability” tool. Each measures a
property that allows a computation of permeability. In general
the best indicators are MDT mobility and CMR permeability.

You might also like