Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Canterbury Tales Explaination
The Canterbury Tales Explaination
In the single story, the opening and closing constitutes a frame. In the cyclical frame
story—that is, a story in which several tales are related—some frames are externally
imposed and only loosely bind the diversified stories. For example, in The Thousand
and One Nights, the frame consists of the story of Scheherazade, who avoids death by
telling her king-husband a story every night and leaving it incomplete. Another example
is the Jātakaṭṭhavaṇṇanā, a collection of some 550 widely popular and often illustrated
stories of former lives of the Buddha (known as Jātakas). It is cast within a framework
of Buddhist ethical teaching.
Other frames are an integral part of the tales. Giovanni Boccaccio’s Decameron, for
example, presents a frame story centred on 10 people fleeing the Black Death who
gather in the countryside and as an amusement relate 10 stories each; the stories are
woven together by a common theme, the way of life of the refined bourgeoisie, who
combined respect for conventions with an open-minded attitude toward personal
behaviour. In Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales (1387–1400) too, the pilgrimage
frame brings together varied tellers of tales, who emerge as vivid personalities and
develop dramatic relationships among themselves and with their tales.
the outstanding English poet before Shakespeare and “the first finder of our
language.” His The Canterbury Tales ranks as one of the greatest poetic works
in English. He also contributed importantly in the second half of the 14th
century to the management of public affairs as courtier, diplomat, and civil
servant. In that career he was trusted and aided by three successive kings—
Edward III, Richard II, and Henry IV. But it is his avocation—the writing of
poetry—for which he is remembered.
Chaucer first appears in the records in 1357, as a member of the household of
Elizabeth, countess of Ulster, wife of Lionel, third son of Edward III.
For this crowning glory of his 30 years of literary composition, Chaucer used
his wide and deep study of medieval books of many sorts and
his acute observation of daily life at many levels. He also employed his
detailed knowledge of medieval astrology and subsidiary sciences as they were
thought to influence and dictate human behaviour.
This literary device gives Chaucer the opportunity to paint a series of vivid word portraits
of a cross-section of his society, from a knight and prioress, to a carpenter and cook; a
much-married wife of Bath, to a bawdy miller – an occupation regarded in Chaucer's
day as shifty and dishonest.
Chaucer mixes satire and realism in lively characterisations of his pilgrims. The tone of
their tales ranges from pious to comic, with humour veering between erudite wit and
good honest vulgarity. Taken together, the tales offer a fascinating insight into English
life during the late 14th century.
Chaucer's original plan was for over 100 stories, but only 24 were completed, some of
which had already been written for earlier works. Their order varies in different surviving
copies, the Hengwrt manuscript being valued most for its accuracy.
Summary
This chapter explores the varying meanings and importance of form in
the Canterbury Tales. Overall, the focus is on Chaucer’s understanding of form as
integral to interpretation. The opening section contextualizes Chaucer’s
approach to form within later medieval poetics, contrasting ideas of formal
perfection and imperfection in the work of Dante and the Pearl-poet with
Chaucer’s responsive and unpredictable forms. The Canterbury Tales is
compared with tale-collections by Gower and Boccaccio, and with Chaucer’s
other tale-collections – the ‘Monk’s Tale’ and the Legend of Good Women. The
chapter explores the interplay and juxtaposition of forms both across the Tales,
and within an individual tale (The Nun’s Priest’s Tale). Moving to a micro-level, it
analyses one specific form – rhyme royal – by close-reading several stanzas
from The Man of Law’s Tale. Finally it argues that Chaucer problematizes the
conventional allegorical idea of seeing through form to reach meaning,
suggesting instead that form and content cannot be divided. Meaning is inherent
in Chaucer’s complex, kinetic, and, above all, multiple forms.
Writing Style
Poetry – rhyming couplets in iambic pentameter
The style of The Canterbury Tales is characterized by rhyming
couplets. That means that every two lines rhyme with each other.
It's also in iambic pentameter (the same style as Shakespeare),
meaning that in each line there are ten syllables, and a heavily
emphasized (stressed) syllable follows a less emphasized
(unstressed) syllable: [dah DAH] [dah DAH] [da DAH] [da DAH]
[da DAH]. Each [da DAH] is an iamb, and there are five of them
per line.
Each line in this couplet has five pairs of syllables, with each pair
consisting of an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed
syllable. The two lines also rhyme with each other, with the words
"soote" and "roote" rhyming.
And the beginning of things is exactly what the poem emphasizes in its
description of springtime, talking about how the wind spreads the seeds
that peek their heads above the soil as they begin to grow into crops, and
how birds begin their mating season.
In its masterful opening, the poem links springtime and sex in the way that
they both cause new life to begin.
• Social class: Chaucer uses the different social classes of the pilgrims to satirize
the society of his time. He shows that people from all walks of life have their own
flaws and virtues, and that social status does not necessarily guarantee
happiness or morality.
• Religion: Chaucer also uses the Canterbury Tales to explore the religious beliefs
and practices of his time. He criticizes the corruption of the Church, but he also
shows that true faith can be found in people of all social classes.
• Human nature: The Canterbury Tales is a deeply human work that explores the
full range of human emotions, from love and compassion to greed and deceit.
Chaucer shows that people are complex creatures who are capable of both good
and evil.