Relations with the Balkans
1. FACTORS AFFECTING
TURKEY'S BALKAN POLICIES
‘Turkey is atleast geographically a Balkan state, with s86 of
its territory consisting of Thrace (located on the Balkan
Peninsula). Although this territory is tiny, the Republic of
“Turkey has been facing the West since its establishment,
and its identity is more Balkan and Mediterranean than
Middle Fastern, The Balkans have held an important
place for Turkey in its foreign policy from a strategic as,
‘well asa human and cultural point of view.
"The importance of the Balkans for Turkey can be ex-
amined under the following headings.
Historical Ties
Historically, the Balkan Peninsula was the main area of
expansion of the Ottoman Empire, The region remained
under Ottoman domination for about 500 years, which
hhas affected the region's religious, ethnic, economic, and
cultural character up to present times. This has been re-
ferred to as the Ottoman heritage and Pax Ottomanica
and has been appraised in different ways, depending on
whether the observer was from Turkey or from elsewhere
inthe region.
Because ofthis historical background, Balkan peoples
and ‘Turks have developed a number of prejudices about
‘one another, ‘These prejudices were particularly strong
‘among the Slavs and the Greeks. Turkey had to carry out
its Balkan policies against this historical background; and
as it became more active in the region during the 1990s,
this was interpreted in some quarters as an attempt to re-
‘tum to the Ottoman past.
From the perspective of non-Muslims among the
Balkan peoples, the Ottoman era was full of dark images
and negative features. Those of Orthodox-Slavic extrac-
tion perceive Ottoman rule as @ period of political, eco
nomic, and cultural oppression. ‘They tend to attribute
their present-day problems and their economic and po-
litical backwardness to the fact that the Ottoman adminis:
oa
‘ration cut them off from the Renaissance and Enlighten-
‘ment that Western Europe experienced.
This frame of mind was developed mainly because
these peoples conducted their struggle for national lib-
eration in the nineteenth century against the Ottoman
administration, In the process of building their nation-
states by re-creating theit histories, they had to rely on
anti-Ottoman/Turkish themes and felt the need to rid
themselves of their association with the Ottoman past.
Another negative aspect of Ottoman rule for the
Orthodox peoples of the Balkans was that it intcoduced
Islam into the region, ‘he Albanians, Bosnians, Poraks,
and Torbesh (Box 6-23) who converted to Islam (some in
part, others in fll) were seen as ethnic or religious groups
that were undesirable vestiges ofthe Ottoman heritage in
the Balkans, All Muslims, especially in the former Yugo-
slavia regardless of their ethnic origin or language, were
regarded as Turks. During the wars ofthe 1990s, an effort
‘wasmadenot only to repress the groups perceived asalien
but also to destroy buildings like mosques and bridges
that recalled the Ottoman past.
Foralongtime, Balkan historians dwelton Ottoman/
‘Turkish oppression, Nonetheless, in the 1980s, especially
‘when the obligatory name-changing campaign was going
con in Bulgaria (sce the discussion below) there was some
attempt to be objective. twas conceded that the religious/
linguistic identity of peoples was atleast preserved during
the Ottoman era. In the 1990s, however, after the demise
ofthe socialist regimes, nationalism was once more on the
ascendancy and the former line was dropped,
In addition to those groups that converted to Islam,
the Turkish minorities are another relic of the Ottoman
petiod in the Balkans. The Turkish minorities in Bulgaria,
Greece, Yugoslavia, and Macedonia are perceived as part
ofthe Ottoman heritage and from time to time find them-
selves subjected to oppression.
‘Turkey also has negative associations with the Bal-
Kans. Duritig the nineteenth century, when nationalismoe
Box 6-23. Musiims and Turks in the Balkans
Ethnic thre ar tree large usin grup in te alan Ts,
‘Albanian, and Slavs,
The Turks he oni) n:Dlgats 00000), Greer
{h20,000), Macedonia (100,000), and Kosovo (12000). These
‘agures represent those who iderily themselves as Tush. an
‘objective ethaley eieich (i, ely by bei apple these
Figures Indude those who are actually Pomalc sins with Stave
fecte ahd Torbsh jn Macedonia (aso ot:
Biba and Gee
‘The Miss ith lic etnies are considered Bulgarians
by Sofa ane Greeks by hens, whl Skane corscestheretobe
Musi Macedonians Staring ithe see0nd bat of the 19905,
‘the Gieee Goverment has Been sternpting ttl an atl
fnenstvestone ister :
--As-@ ule, those of Pomak: and Tomes acest obi
"fold they ate not Take: Pofnaks Westar thrate
in Maceachia have requeriy oman a =
sor fet
at Tucks: (The)
io Gat
rae
‘was'rampant, there was political and social chaos in the
region. The ost battles and the retreats led to mass migra
tions of Balkan Turks/Muslits to Anatolia. With these
rigrations. the bitterness of the oppression and forced
displacement experienced in the Balkans was carried over
to Anatolia, to reinforce existing prejudices there. ‘The
Balkan region, which was the first area of expansion of the
Ottoman Empie, was also the area where the process of
disintegration and loss of territory began,
In addition, the Balkan region was where Turkish
nationalism found its intellectual roots, It was here that
the tradition of setting up political organizations among
‘Turks got started. As nationalist currents in the Balkans
reached their peak in the last quarter of the nineteenth
century, the Turks also began to feel their effects. Jn par-
ticulay the Society of Union and Progress was inspired by
the Balkan pattern of rebel band and secret revolution-
ary society, both in ts establishment and in its structure,
Salonica was a highly cosmopolitan city, and its cultural
environment could be considered liberal in the Ottoman
context. It as therefore natural that Turkish military of-
ficers and intellectuals would make their first contact with
nationalism in this city.
From the establishment ofthe Republic until the end
of the 1980s, the Balkans has been a region with mostly
negative aspects for Turkey. In the interwat period the
Balkan Peninsula was one of Italy’s two areas of expan-
thes, when the Turks fel the ainsation he millet 8).