Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/3112555

FEM Computation of Magnetic Field and Iron Loss in Laminated Iron Core Using
Homogenization Method

Article in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · May 2007


DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2007.892429 · Source: IEEE Xplore

CITATIONS READS
114 687

3 authors:

Hiroyuki Kaimori Akihisa Kameari


Science Solutions International Laboratory, Inc. Science Solutions International Laboratory, Inc.
20 PUBLICATIONS 217 CITATIONS 94 PUBLICATIONS 1,485 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Koji Fujiwara
Doshisha University
455 PUBLICATIONS 4,899 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Cauer Ladder Network View project

Pellet fueling View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Akihisa Kameari on 04 January 2013.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


PC4-5

FEM Computation of Magnetic Field and Iron Loss in Laminated Iron Core
Using Homogenization Method

Hiroyuki Kaimori 1, Akihisa Kameari 1, Member, IEEE, and Koji Fujiwara 2


1
Science Solutions International Laboratory, Inc.
2-21-7, Naka-cho, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-0065, Japan, E-mail: {kaimorih, kamearia}@ssil.co.jp
2
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Okayama University
3-1-1, Tsushima, Okayama 700-8530, Japan, E-mail: fujiwara@eplab.elec.okayama-u.ac.jp

Abstract— This paper presents a transient magnetic field The Homogenized magnetic field is calculated transiently
analysis in the laminated iron core by the Finite Element Method by using the general FEM with the constitutive relations
(FEM) using a proposed homogenization method. Homogenized shown in (1) and (3). bs changes nonlinearly against B.
constitutive relations in static magnetic field are assumed in the Therefore, the equations (1) and (2) are solved by means of a
transient calculation because of the low frequency of 50 Hz. The nonlinear iterative procedure such as the Newton-Raphson
analyzed magnetic field distribution and iron loss were fairly in
method.
good agreement with the measurements.
The iron loss is calculated after the field computation as,
2 2 2
I. INTRODUCTION W D K e f 2 bsm  K h fbsm  J || ¦ || , (4)
The magnetic field analysis and estimation of iron loss in where bsm is the maximum magnitude of the flux density. f is
the laminated iron core is important for the electromagnetic the frequency. Ke and Kh are the measured coefficients for the
devices. It is considerably time-consuming and practically eddy current loss and hysteresis loss, respectively. J|| is the
impossible to model each sheet in the lamination. The eddy current density parallel to the laminated plane.
homogenization technique [1] seems to be one of the practical
solutions to analyze the laminated iron core. This paper deals III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
with the homogenized magnetic and electric constitutive The benchmark problem [2] shown in Fig. 1 was analyzed.
relations applicable to the analysis of nearly static magnetic This problem is proposed at a committee for the technical
fields neglecting the effect of eddy currents looping in the meeting established in the IEE of Japan. A C-shape core puts
thickness direction of lamination. The formulation was applied on the Epstein core. Those cores have 60 iron sheets (JIS
to analyses of a benchmark problem, where the skin depth is grade: 50A350, thickness: 0.5mm) for the lamination in the y-
enough larger than the thickness of each sheet composed of direction and z-direction, respectively. The space factor D is
the laminated iron core because of the low frequency. It was set to be 0.985. The flux generated by the exciting coil
verified that the proposed method was effective to analyze penetrates into the Epstein core. The calculated iron loss
both magnetic field and iron loss in the laminated iron core. distribution is illustrated in Fig. 1 and the comparison between
measured and calculated flux density distribution on reference
II. HOMOGENIZATION METHOD plane is shown in Fig. 2. From both results, it can be
concluded that the proposed method is fairly effective.
The magnetic property of the iron sheet is assumed to be
completely isotropic and nonlinear. The magnetic reluctivity
㫄㪼㪸㫊㫌㫉㪼㪻
of the iron sheet Q s (bs ) depends on the magnitude of the 䎕䎑䎓 㪺㪸㫃㪺㫌㫃㪸㫋㪼㪻

magnetic flux density bs. The homogenized magnetic


䎩䏏䏘䏛䎃䏇䏈䏑䏖䏌䏗䏜䎃䎾䎷䏀

䎔䎑䎓
reluctivities N || and N A in the parallel and perpendicular
directions to the laminated plane are given as, 䎓䎑䎓
1 D 1D
 , N A DQ s (bs )  1  D Q 0 , (1) 䎐䎔䎑䎓
N || Q s (bs ) Q0
where Q 0 is the reluctivity of vacuum assigned to the 䎐䎕䎑䎓
interlaminar gap between sheets and D is the space factor of 䎕䎓 䎖䎓 䎗䎓
䎷䏌䏐䏈䎃䎾䏐䏖䏀
the lamination. bs is related to the homogenized magnetic flux Fig. 1. Benchmark model for iron Fig. 2. Comparison between measured
density B as, loss calculation of laminated core. and calculated flux density.
2
­ N || ½ 2 2
bs® ¾ B||  BA . (2) IV. REFERENCES
Q (b )
¯ s s ¿ [1] P-S. Shin and J. Lee, “Magnetic Field Analysis of Amorphous Core
The homogenized conductivities 6 || and 6 A are given as, Transformer Using Homogenization Technique,” IEEE Trans. Magn.,
vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1808-1811 (1977).
6 || DV s , 6 A 0, (3) [2] K. Yamazaki, et al., “Basic Study on Methods for Analyses of Eddy
Currents Caused by Normal Flux in Laminated Core -Comparison
where V s is the conductivity of the iron sheet. between Experimental and Calculated Results-,” The 2005 Annual
Meeting Record of IEE Japan, pp. 320-321 (2005) (in Japanese).

1-4244-0320-0/06/$20.00 ©2006 IEEE 215

View publication stats

You might also like