Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethics WA-1
Ethics WA-1
Gangs (ETH-230-OL014)
Amanda Todd and Anonymous 2
Amanda Todd’s story is a heartfelt one for most that grew up in the school systems who
dealt with bullies. This is not just about kids being picked on, this goes much deeper than
that. She felt exiled from her family and friends. She felt there was no one she could turn
to her friends isolated her and she didn’t feel she could take this to her family.
Like any teenager she spent time online and met various people over the internet, one of
those individuals who she who she met on Facebook, talked to her and flattered her with
compliments and praise to the point of convincing her to flashing him. He took a picture
of Amanda topless, than proceeded to stalker her around the internet and eventually asked
her to put on another show for him. Amanda rebuffed his advances and refused to give in
to him wanting another online sex show. In response to being rejected he searched out her
classmates on Facebook and sent them the picture, which lead to her being ostracized and
The distribution of Amanda Todd’s naked private pictures, ruined her reputation, with no
cope with all the anxiety and depression that she was feeling she began to turn to things
to attempt to lessen the pain drugs and alcohol and even promiscuous flirtations and sex.
When that was not enough to drown out the pain she attempted to drink bleach in her first
failed suicide attempt and in the coming months she tried again and again until finally she
Amanda’s harasser should be held accountable for his crimes. Whether they were in
person or as a digital footprint on the internet. You are still responsible for your actions
in anything and any form that they take. If your actions cause harm to another individual
you are liable for criminal or civil charges depending on the extent of damages that have
been caused.
In the case of Amanda Todd she ended up taking her life after the individual preyed upon
her while her life fell to pieces as she feel deeper and deeper into depression. He was
ultimately responsible for the resulting actions of Amanda Todd’s death by leaking the
Federal law 47 U.S.C. §§ 223. (a) (1) (A) Knowingly using a telecommunications device
proposal, or image which is obscene or is child pornography with intent to harass another
communication which is obscene or child pornography, knowing that the recipient of the
communication is under 18 years of age, to harass any person; or (E) repeatedly initiating
fine and imprisonment for not more than two years, or both. ( Federal Research Division,
This clearly states that it is a federal crime for corruption of a minor even though the
crime took place entirely online. Anonymous was wrong in what they did by ruining an
innocent man’s life. They were wrong in the person that they ousted, and in that they are
just as guilty of harming another with their online activities. The Anonymous group calls
into play ethics, but not just ethics but deontological or consequentialist ethics primarily.
Do we say that the letter of the law makes them criminals or do we say that the ends
justify the means? I believe that they messed up and I follow consequentialist ethics view
and believe that in the larger scope of things they have done much greater good than they
To govern cyber-bullying we need to set forth policies and have divisions whose sole
purpose is to combat it. They can monitor social media for threats while campaigning for
bullying and an anonymous call in-center for individuals to contact when they need help.
We need to push suicide awareness in schools and colleges and let kids know that there
are avenues that they can go to and that suicide is never the answer.
Bibliography
Amanda Todd and Anonymous 5
Dean, M. (2012, 10 18). The Story of Amanda Todd. Retrieved 04 20, 2018, from The New
Yorker: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/the-story-of-amanda-todd
NOBullying.com. (2017, 05 19). The Unforgettable Amanda Todd Story. Retrieved 04 20, 2018,