Professional Documents
Culture Documents
25 Tsav Etz Hayim
25 Tsav Etz Hayim
25 Tsav Etz Hayim
g
ETZ HAYIM
TORAH AND COMMENTARY
Produced by T H E J EW I S H P U B L I C AT I O N S O C I ET Y
Blessings for the Torah and haftarot have been adapted from
Siddur Sim Shalom for Shabbat and Festivals, © 2000 by The Rabbinical Assembly.
Maps © by Oxford University Press, supplied by Oxford Cartographers. Used by permission of Oxford University Press.
Illustrations of the tabernacle and its furnishings by Joe Sikora.
09 10 10 9 8
2001029757
In this parashah, we can see why the book is brew word torat (“ritual of”) as “Torah for”: “In
thought to be a manual for kohanim. How the our day, the study of Torah takes the place of
bringing animal oerings” (BT Men. 110a). If
kohen carries out his part of the sacricial ser-
vice is the focus of most of the text. so, then why command Aaron? Because Aaron
Nehama
· Leibowitz suggests that chapters might be reluctant to tell the people that the
study of Torah is equivalent to bringing sacri-
1–5 are addressed to the Israelite public. There-
fore, they begin with voluntary oerings (olah,ces. That would make the role of the koha-
minhah,
· and sh’lamim) and continue with nim less prominent, as it would present the
those that apply only to certain individuals inpeople with an alternative form of worship
(Hatam
certain circumstances (e.g., the purication of- · Sofer).
fering of the kohen). Chapters 6–7 are directed the re on the altar is kept going on it The
to the ociating priests. For that reason, the last Hebrew word can also be read “within
sequence of oerings is changed, beginning him” (instead of “on it”). This prompted the
with the oerings that have the highest degree comment that the re on the altar must be par-
of sanctity (“most holy”) and continuing with alleled by a re in the heart of the ociating
those of a lesser level of sanctity. priest, whose enthusiasm for the sacred nature
of the work must never be lost. The congrega-
CHAPTER 6 tion, for its part, must recognize its responsi-
2. Command Aaron . . . This is the ritual of bility to see that the enthusiasm and dedica-
the burnt offering The Talmud reads the He- tion of the clergy are never extinguished.
4. take off his vestments The priestly vest- THE GRAIN OFFERING (minhah)
·
ments were to be worn only in the sanctuary pre- (vv. 7–11)
cincts (Exod. 28:43). For the preparation and presentation of this of-
outside the camp to a pure place Called “the fering, see Lev. 2.
ash heap” in 4:12. The spot near the eastern side 9. eaten by Aaron and his sons An impor-
of the altar where the ashes were dumped is called tant element not stressed in chapter 2: Participa-
“the place for the ashes” in 1:16. tion of the priests is indispensable to the efficacy
6. perpetual fire . . . on the altar, not to go of this ritual.
out The requirement to keep the fire burning enclosure of the Tent of Meeting The tab-
at all times is also implied in verse 2. Perpetual ernacle had an enclosed courtyard (e.g., see Exod.
fire expressed the Israelites’ devotion to God by 27:9–19, 35:17), an arrangement later duplicated
showing that they were attendant on Him at all at the temple in Jerusalem. This sacred area, here
times in the sanctuary. and in verse 19, is called “courtyard” (hatzer);
· usu-
3. The rst act of the kohen every morn- in mundane pursuits (Simhah
· Bunem). Why
ing is to put on ordinary clothes and remove were the ashes treated with such reverence?
the ashes of the previous night’s sacrice. It symbolizes the idea that what was holy
This ensures that he never forgets his link yesterday must be treated with respect today
to the ordinary people who spend their days as well.
ally it is referred to as “the entrance of the Tent 12. ephah See Comment to Exod. 16:36.
of Meeting” (petah· ohel mo•ed ), which included
a large part of the courtyard. THE GRAIN OFFERING OF THE
11. Only the males among Aaron’s descen- HIGH PRIEST (vv. 12–16)
dants Any foods brought for sacrifices could be 13. offering Hebrew: korban; see D’rash to
eaten only by the priests themselves. Other food- 1:2.
stuffs collected for their support and other forms on the occasion of his anointment The rite
of priestly revenue could be used to feed their of anointing (unction), described in 8:10ff., was
families. essential to the status of the High Priest. The altar,
due Hebrew: hok · (fem. hukkah),
· which sig- too, was anointed.
nifies a law ordained by written statute. By ex- regular Hebrew: tamid, used for the most
tension, it connotes one’s lawful share or amount, part to characterize regular daily offerings.
a rightful due. 16. every grain offering of a priest Every of-
Anything that touches these shall become holy fering of grain brought by a priest on his own be-
The condition of holiness, unlike that of impu- half, or on behalf of the priesthood, in expiation
rity, was not regarded as contagious. Thus it or as a voluntary offering, was to be burned en-
would be better to translate: “Anyone who is to tirely on the altar. This affirms the rule that priests
touch these must be in a holy state.” Only con- could benefit only for services undertaken on be-
secrated persons may have contact with sacrificial half of other Israelites, not on their own behalf.
materials. This notion reinforces the opening of When the offering served only the priests them-
the verse: Only Aaronide priests may partake of selves, the usual share of the priests had to be sur-
the sacrifices. An act of consecration is required. rendered to God.
10. The purication oerings and the sibility of serving as religious ociants, rabbis,
reparation oerings are called “most holy.” A and cantors, to women as well.
greater degree of holiness is ascribed to the per- 13. as a regular grain offering The daily
son who has struggled with sin and overcome it grain oering of the High Priest taught the poor
than to the person who never has been tempted. not to be ashamed of their grain oering, which
11. only the males Most Conservative syn- was the same size. It also taught the High Priest
agogues have extended the honor and respon- humility (Abravanel).
Etz Hayim: Torah and Commentary
Copyright © 2001 by the Rabbinical Assembly
LEVITICUS 6:17 ˆ  ‡¯˜È 616
17The L spoke to Moses, saying: 18Speak ³¥ © 18 :¯Ó‡l
¯ac Ÿ « ¥ ‰LÓ ¬¤ Ÿ -χ¤ ‰Â‰È −¨ § ¯a„È ¬¥ © § © 17
to Aaron and his sons thus: This is the ritual ˙¯Bz−© ˙‡ÊŸ¬ ¯Ó‡Ï Ÿ ½ ¥ ÂÈa ´¨ ¨ -χ Ÿ £ © ‡
¤ § ÆÔ¯‰‡-Ï «¤
of the purification offering: the purification
¨¹ Ÿ ¨ ËÁMz
‰ÏÚ‰ ¥̧ ¨ ¦ Á¯L ¤‡ £ ÌB˜Óa ¿ § ¦ ˙‡hÁ‰ ®¨ © «©
offering shall be slaughtered before the L,
at the spot where the burnt offering is slaugh-
ÌÈL„˜ −¦ ¨ «¨ L„˜ ¤Ÿ ¬ ‰Â‰È ¨½ § ÈÙÏ ´¥ § ¦ Æ˙‡hÁ‰ ¨ © «© ËÁMz ³¥ ¨ ¦
tered: it is most holy. 19The priest who offers ¨ ®¤ £ Ÿ d˙‡
‰pÏÎ‡È −¨ Ÿ ‡hÁÓ‰ ¬¥ © § «© Ô‰k‰ ²¥ Ÿ © 19 :‡Â‰ «¦
it as a purification offering shall eat of it; it shall :„ÚBÓ«¥ ω‡ ¤ Ÿ ¬ ¯ˆÁa −© £ © Ï·z ¥½ ¨ «¥ ÆL„˜ Ÿ ¨ ÌB˜Óa ³¨ §
be eaten in the sacred precinct, in the enclosure ³¤ ¦ ¯L
‰fÈ ¤̧ ‡Â
£ © Lc˜È ®¨ § ¦ d¯N·a −¨ ¨ § ¦ ÚbÈ-¯L ¬© ¦ ¤ ‡ £ Ïk Ÿ ² 20
of the Tent of Meeting. 20Anything that touches
−¥ © § ‰ÈÏÚ
ÒaÎz ¨ ¤½ ¨ ‰fÈ ´¤ ¦ ƯL ¤‡ ¤ ¤½ © © ÆdÓcÓ
£ „‚a‰-ÏÚ ¨ ¨¦
its flesh shall become holy; and if any of its blood
-ÏM·z © ª § ¯L ¬¤ ‡ £ N¯Á-ÈÏÎe ¤ ²¤ ¦ § 21 :L„˜ Ÿ « ¨ ÌB˜Óa ¬¨ §
is spattered upon a garment, you shall wash the
bespattered part in the sacred precinct. 21An ¬©Ÿ ‰ÏMa
˜¯Óe ¨ ¨½ ª Æ˙LÁ ¤ Ÿ Æ § ÈÏÎa³¦ § ¦ -̇ ¦ § ¯·MÈ ®¥ ¨ ¦ Ba−
earthen vessel in which it was boiled shall be ´© Ÿ Ìȉka
ÏÎ‡È −¦ £ Ÿ © ¯ÎÊ-Ïk ¬¨ ¨ ¨ 22 :ÌÈna ¦ «¨ © ÛhL −© ª §
broken; if it was boiled in a copper vessel, [the ˙‡hÁ-ÏΨ¿ © ¨ § 23 :‡Â‰ « ¦ ÌÈL„˜ −¦ ¨ «¨ L„˜ ¤Ÿ ¬ d˙‡ ®¨ Ÿ
vessel] shall be scoured and rinsed with water.
¬¥ © § „ÚBÓ
¯tÎÏ ²¥ ω‡-Ϥ Ÿ ¯ ‡¤ dÓcÓ ¹̈ ¨ ¦ ‡·eÈ ¨¸ Á¯L ¤‡ £
22Only the males in the priestly line may eat of
Ù :Û¯Oz «¥ ¨ ¦ L‡a −¥ ¨ Ï·˙ ®¥ ¨ ¥ ‡Ï Ÿ ´ L„wa ¤Ÿ − ©
it: it is most holy. 23But no purification offering
may be eaten from which any blood is brought
into the Tent of Meeting for expiation in the
sanctuary; any such shall be consumed in fire.
7. it shall belong to the priest who makes ex- THE SACRIFICE OF WELL-BEING
piation thereby Sacrifices of expiation eaten by (zevah· ha-sh’lamim) (vv. 11–34)
the priests are actually their property. 11. As in chapter 3, this section uses the term
8. The officiating priest, in most cases, could sh’lamim in a general sense, referring to all sacri-
keep the hide as his own and profit from its value. fices of the zevah· type.
9–10. Verse 9 speaks of offerings prepared in 12. for thanksgiving For expressing one’s
an oven, in a pan, or on a griddle, all of which gratitude to God for deliverance from danger or
belong to the officiating priest. Verse 10 speaks misfortune.
of other offerings that belong to all priests. These sacrifice of thanksgiving Hebrew: zevah·
verses are saying, in effect, that the parts of the todah, which refers here to the animal sacrifice or-
grain offerings due to the priests are to go to the dained in chapter 3: a sheep or a goat of either
officiants at these rites. gender. The ritual first considers the preparation
and disposition of the grain offerings of both un- that deity. Only then did the deity grant portions
leavened and leavened cakes that accompanied of the offering to the priests and, occasionally, to
the animal sacrifice, a matter not taken up else- the donors as well. Consequently, even in this
where in Leviticus. It then deals with the animal case, in which no part of the leavened grain of-
sacrifice itself, the basic information for which is fering was placed on the altar, it could be con-
in chapter 3. sidered as an offering to the Lord.
13. No leaven may be placed on the altar of 15. The flesh must be eaten on the day the
burnt offerings (Lev. 2:11). Thus only the un- altar sacrifice is made. If not consumed then, it
leavened cakes are offered on the altar, not the must be burned. This is yet another difference be-
leavened cakes. tween the thanksgiving sacrifice (todah) and other
with . . . added . . . along with Hebrew: al; sh’lamim sacrifices.
literally, “on.” This preposition occurs twice in 16. Except in the case of a thanksgiving of-
this verse, where it means “in addition to.” fering (todah), the flesh of sh’lamim sacrifices may
14. one of each kind as a gift to the Lord be eaten until the third day, a rule also stated in
Sacrificial procedures in biblical Israel, and in the 19:5–8. There were no restrictions regarding
ancient Near East generally, often dictated that where the donor of a sh’lamim could eat his or
the offering first be presented to the deity for ac- her portion of the offering, so long as no person
ceptance, at which time it belonged entirely to in an impure state partook of the flesh (v. 19).
should bring a todah: when one has safely com- miracle in the life of the donor. Abravanel
pleted a dangerous journey, recovered from ill- says that if it must be consumed in a single
ness, been released from con4nement, or sur- day, the owner will invite more people to
vived other dangers. The custom continues to share it, thus publicizing the miracle more
this day in the Gomel blessing oered in the widely. “On being asked what prompted this
synagogue, during the Torah reading, by a wor- feast, the host will recount some good fortune
shiper who has avoided or survived misfortune. and the divine wonder it represents.” We
The talmudic text states that people “need” should have con4dence that each new day
(tzrikhin) to bring a todah rather than “are will produce its own miracle. Therefore, the
obliged” to bring one, perhaps to suggest that feast celebrating a miraculous event should
thegratefulindividualbringsthetodahtoful4ll be con4ned to one day and not extended into
a psychological need rather than to meet a reli- the next. Tomorrow will bring its own mir-
gious obligation. acle (Yitzhak
· Meir Alter of Ger). “In time to
15. Several commentators connect the re- come, there will be no sacri4ces except for
quirement that the todah be eaten on the day the oering of thanksgiving, and there will
it is oered and on the following evening to be no prayers except for prayers of thanks-
the fact that it is brought in response to a giving” (Lev. R. 9:7).
freewill offering Hebrew: n’davah, which also cause parts of it were handled by ordinary Israel-
serves as a general term for many types of volun- ites outside the sanctuary.
tary contributions to the sanctuary. Like the 23. You shall eat no fat See Comment to
todah, it expresses gratitude to God and is often 3:3.
mentioned together with the vow (neder). 24. Fat from animals that died An animal
18. Because the sacrificial meat was left un- torn by beasts (t’refah) and the carcass of a dead
eaten for an improper length of time, the sacrifice animal (n’velah) are forbidden in their entirety
itself was not efficacious. In this verse, the penalty (Exod. 22:30, Lev. 17:15). Hence, any part of
for eating flesh remaining from the sh’lamim sac- such an animal would also be forbidden. It is
rifice after the third day is stated merely as “bear- likely that this seemingly superfluous rule was in-
ing one’s guilt,” whereas in 19:5–8 the same of- cluded here for emphasis, to reinforce the ban on
fense brings on the penalty of being cut off from eating organ fat (heilev)
· (see 3:16).
the religious community. 25. from which gifts may be made This clar-
19. Beginning with this verse, the text deals ifies the provisions of verse 23. The heilev
· of large
more explicitly with the subject of impurity, a and small cattle is forbidden, because such ani-
concern particularly relevant to the sh’lamim, be- mals are of the kind offered as sacrifices.
29–30. The donor of the sh’lamim had to raised up, in dedication to God. “Elevation of-
personally participate in the presentation of the fering” here is the designation for t’nufah, derived
offering. Because nonpriests could not actually from the verb henif (lift, raise).
place sacrifices on the altar—indeed, they were 31. the priest shall turn the fat into smoke
banned from the adjacent area—the rite of “pres- The priest was entitled to take the breast and the
entation” (t’nufah) afforded them some measure right thigh of the sacrificial animal only after
of participation in sacrifices of lesser sanctity such God’s share of the offering (i.e., the fatty portions)
as this one. had been burned on the altar.
30. the breast to be elevated as an elevation 34. the thigh of gift offering See Comment
offering before the Lord The offering was to 7:14.
ments, four of which were unique to him (see 10–12. In these verses we read of two parallel
Exod. 28 and 39). acts: the consecration of Aaron, the High Priest,
8. breastpiece Made of wool and linen, with and the consecration of the altar and the taber-
gold threads woven into the fabric, and 12 gem nacle with its vessels. Both were accomplished by
stones were set into the cloth, with the name of the same means—anointing with the same oil. In
a different tribe of Israel engraved on each stone. this way Aaron, too, became a sacred vessel.
Urim and Thummim These were flat stones 13. After the sons of Aaron were robed, the
used for the casting of lots. The act of casting lots sacrifices of ordination commenced.
was the only form of divination permitted in an- 14. Large cattle were used in purification of-
cient Israelite official worship, which normally ob- ferings when the entire community, or the High
jected to the use of omens for predicting the future. Priest in particular, were affected.
9. headdress Ordinary priests wore turbans;
only the High Priest wore the royal headdress.
clude with shalom “peace,” the ultimate bles- had been consecrated for special responsibil-
sing. ity. Throughout the Bible, it refers only to a
human priest or king. The prophets’ vision
CHAPTER 8 of the Messiah was of a good and benevolent
12. anointed him, to consecrate him The king who would earn peace and prosperity for
· is the people by serving God wholeheartedly (see
verb translated as “anointed” (va-yimshah)
related to the noun mashi•ah · (messiah), Isa. 11:1–9). Biblical and Rabbinic Judaism as
which originally meant “anointed one.” It re- a rule did not conceive of the Messiah as a
ferred to a priest, and later to a king, who superhuman redeemer.
Etz Hayim: Torah and Commentary
Copyright © 2001 by the Rabbinical Assembly
623 LEVITICUS 8:15 ˆ Á ‡¯˜ÈÂ
upon the head of the bull of purification offer- :˙‡hÁ‰ «¨ © «© ¯t ¬© L‡¯-ÏÚ Ÿ − © ̉ȄÈ-˙‡ ¤½ ¥ § ¤ ÆÂÈ·e ¨¨
ing, 15and it was slaughtered. Moses took the ¥ ¦ ©Â ÆÌc‰-˙‡
Ôzi ¨© ¤ ‰LÓ ³¤ Ÿ Áwi ¸© ¦ © ËÁLi À̈ § ¦ © 15
blood and with his finger put some on each of
‡hÁÈÂ−¥ © § © BÚaˆ‡a ½ ¨ § ¤ § Æ·È·Ò ¦ ¨ ÁaÊn‰ ©³¥ § ¦ © ˙B¯˜-ÏÚ ¸ §© ©
the horns of the altar, purifying the altar; then
he poured out the blood at the base of the altar.
„BÒÈ-Ï ´ § ‡¤ ƘˆÈ © ¨ Ìc‰-˙‡Â À¨ © ¤ § ÁaÊn‰-˙‡ ©®¥ § ¦ © ¤
Thus he consecrated it in order to make expia- :ÂÈÏÚ «¨ ¨ ¯tÎÏ ¬¥ © § e‰Lc˜È −¥ § © § «© ÁaÊn‰ © ¥½ § ¦ ©
tion upon it. ¼·¯w‰-ÏÚ
¤ ¤ © © ¯L ´¤ ‡ £ »·ÏÁ‰-Ïk ¤ ¥ © ¨ -˙‡ «¤ Áwi À© ¦ © 16
16Moses then took all the fat that was about
Ÿ− ¨ § © ÈzL-˙‡Â
˙ÈÏk‰ ¬¥ § ¤ § „·k‰ ¥½ ¨ © ˙¯˙È ¤ ´¤ Ÿ Æ˙‡Â ¥§
the entrails, and the protuberance of the liver,
:‰ÁaÊn‰ ¨ «¥ § ¦ © ‰LÓ −¤ Ÿ ¯Ë˜i ¬¥ § © © Ô‰aÏÁ-˙‡Â ®¤ § § ¤ «¤ §
and the two kidneys and their fat, and turned
them into smoke on the altar. 17The rest of the
-˙‡Â ¤ § B¯Na ´ ¨ § -˙‡Â ¤ § ÆB¯Ú-˙‡Â Ÿ ¤ § ¯t‰-˙‡Â ³¨ © ¤ § 17
bull, its hide, its flesh, and its dung, he put to ¯L ²¤ ‡k £ © ‰ÁnÏ ®¤ £ © «© ıeÁÓ − ¦ L‡a ¥½ ¨ Û¯N ´© ¨ BL¯t ½ §¦
the fire outside the camp—as the L had :‰LÓ «¤ Ÿ -˙‡¤ ‰Â‰È −¨ § ‰eˆ ¬¨ ¦
commanded Moses. Ÿ ¯ £ © eÎÓÒiÂ
Ô¯‰‡ º § § ¦ «© ‰ÏÚ‰ ®¨ Ÿ ¨ Ïȇ ´¥ ˙‡ −¥ ·¯˜i ¾¥ § © © 18
18Then he brought forward the ram of burnt
:Ïȇ‰ ¦ «¨ ¨ L‡¯-ÏÚ Ÿ ¬ © ̉ȄÈ-˙‡ −¤ ¥ § ¤ ÂÈ·e ²¨ ¨
offering. Aaron and his sons laid their hands
upon the ram’s head, 19and it was slaughtered.
-ÏÚ© Ìc‰-˙‡ ²¨ © ¤ ‰LÓ ¯¤ Ÿ ˜¯Êi Ÿ ¸ § ¦ © ËÁLi ®¨ § ¦ © 19
Moses dashed the blood against all sides of the Áz −© ¦ Ïȇ‰-˙‡Â ¦ ©½ ¨ ¤ § 20 :·È·Ò « ¦ ¨ ÁaÊn‰ © −¥ § ¦ ©
altar. 20The ram was cut up into sections and -˙‡Â ¤ § L‡¯‰-˙‡ Ÿ½ ¨ ¤ ƉLÓ ¤ Ÿ ¯Ë˜i ³¥ § © © ÂÈÁ˙Ï ®¨ ¨ § ¦
Moses turned the head, the sections, and the ¤ ¬¤ ©
·¯w‰-˙‡Â ¤ § 21 :¯„t‰-˙‡Â ¤ «¨ © ¤ § ÌÈÁ˙p‰ −¦ ¨ § ©
suet into smoke on the altar; 21Moses washed
‰LÓ ¤̧ Ÿ Á¯Ë˜i ¥ § © © ÌÈna ¦ ®¨ © ıÁ¯ ´© ¨ ÌÈÚ¯k‰-˙‡Â ¦ −© ¨ § © ¤§
the entrails and the legs with water and turned
all of the ram into smoke. That was a burnt
-ÁÈ¯Ï © «¥ § ‡e‰³ ‰ÏÚ ¨¸ Ÿ ‰ÁaÊn‰ ¨ ¥À § ¦ © Ïȇ‰-Ïk ¦ ©¹ ¨ ¨ -˙‡¤
offering for a pleasing odor, a gift to the L— −¨ § ‰eˆ
‰Â‰È ¬¨ ¦ ¯L ²¤ ‡k £ © ‰Â‰ÈÏ ¨½ © Ƈe‰ ‰M‡ ¬¤ ¦ ÆÁÁÈ ©Ÿ Æ ¦
as the L had commanded Moses. :‰LÓ «¤ Ÿ -˙‡¤
22He brought forward the second ram, the
Ìȇln‰ ®¦ ª ¦ © Ïȇ −¥ ÈM‰ ½¦ ¥ © Ïȇ‰-˙‡ ¦ ´© ¨ ¤ Æ·¯˜i ¥ § © © 22 È˘˘
ram of ordination. Aaron and his sons laid their
L‡¯-ÏÚ Ÿ ¬ © ̉ȄÈ-˙‡ −¤ ¥ § ¤ ÂÈ·e ²¨ ¨ Ô¯‰‡ Ÿ ¯ £ © eÎÓÒi º § § ¦ «©
hands upon the ram’s head, 23and it was slaugh-
tered. Moses took some of its blood and put it
²¥ ¦ © BÓcÓ
Ôzi ½ ¨ ¦ ƉLÓ ¤ Ÿ Áwi ³© ¦ © | ËÁLi Ã̈ § ¦ © 23 :Ïȇ‰ ¦ «¨ ¨
on the ridge of Aaron’s right ear, and on the ÆB„Ȩ Ô‰a ¤ Ÿ ³ -ÏÚ © § ˙ÈÓȉ ®¦ ¨ § © Ô¯‰‡-Ôʇ Ÿ − £ © ¤Ÿ « Cez-ÏÚ ¬§ ©
thumb of his right hand, and on the big toe of º¥ § © © 24 :˙ÈÓȉ
·¯˜i « ¦ ¨ § © BÏ‚¯ − § © Ô‰a ¤ Ÿ ¬ -ÏÚ© § ˙ÈÓȉ ½¦ ¨ § ©
his right foot. 24Moses then brought forward the -ÏÚ© ÆÌc‰-ÔÓ ¨ © ¦ ‰LÓ ³¤ Ÿ Ôzi ¥̧ ¦ © Ô¯‰‡ Ÿ À £ © Èa ´¥ § -˙‡¤
sons of Aaron, and put some of the blood on
ÆÌ„È ¨ ¨ Ô‰a ¤ Ÿ ³ -ÏÚ © § ˙ÈÓȉ ½¦ ¨ § © ÆÌʇ ¨ § ¨ Cez ³§
the ridges of their right ears, and on the thumbs
of their right hands, and on the big toes of their
15. he consecrated it in order to make expi- Aaron and his sons were purified as they entered
ation upon it Expiatory sacrifices required an into their new status.
altar. 24. the rest of the blood Moses dashed against
18–21. The function of this sacrifice was to every side of the altar This is similar to what
evoke a favorable response from God before mak- occurred during the covenantal ceremony at Sinai
ing an approach with other sacrifices. (Exod. 24:6–8). In the ordination of the priests,
23. blood . . . Aaron’s right ear Dabbing sac- the sacrificial blood served a dual function. It pu-
rificial blood on certain extremities of the body rified the priests and also bound them in a cov-
is essentially a rite of purification. In this manner enant of service to God in the tabernacle.
Etz Hayim: Torah and Commentary
Copyright © 2001 by the Rabbinical Assembly
LEVITICUS 8:25 ˆ Á ‡¯˜È 624
right feet; and the rest of the blood Moses Ÿ ¸ § ¦ © ˙ÈÓȉ
˜¯Êi ®¦ ¨ § © ÌÏ‚¯ −¨ § © Ô‰a ¤ Ÿ ¬ -ÏÚ © § ˙ÈÓȉ ½¦ ¨ § ©
dashed against every side of the altar. 25He took :·È·Ò « ¦ ¨ ÁaÊn‰-ÏÚ © −¥ § ¦ «© © Ìc‰-˙‡ ²¨ © ¤ ‰LÓ ¯¤ Ÿ
the fat—the broad tail, all the fat about the en-
-˙‡Â «¤ § ‰ÈÏ À̈ § ‡‰-˙‡Â
© «¨ ¤ § ·ÏÁ‰-˙‡ ¤ ´¥ © ¤ Áwi º© ¦ © 25
trails, the protuberance of the liver, and the two
kidneys and their fat—and the right thigh.
˙¯˙È ¤ ´¤ Ÿ Æ˙‡Â ¥ § ¼·¯w‰-ÏÚ ¤ ¤ © © ¯L ´¤ ‡ £ »·ÏÁ‰-Ïk ¤ ¥ © ¨
26From the basket of unleavened bread that was ®¤ § § ¤ «¤ § ˙ÈÏk‰
Ô‰aÏÁ-˙‡Â Ÿ− ¨ § © ÈzL-˙‡Â ¬¥ § ¤ § „·k‰ ¥½ ¨ ©
before the L, he took one cake of unleavened | ¯L ´¤ ‡ £ ˙Bvn‰ ¹ © © ÏqÓe ¸© ¦ 26 :ÔÈÓi‰ « ¦ ¨ © ˜BL ¬ ˙‡Â −¥ §
bread, one cake of oil bread, and one wafer, and ˙lÁ ©¸ © « § Æ˙Á‡ © © ‰vÓ ³¨ © ˙lÁ ©¸ © Á˜Ï © ¨  ‰Â‰È À̈ § ÈÙÏ ´¥ § ¦
placed them on the fat parts and on the right
-ÏÚ© ÆÌNi ¤ ƨ © „Á‡ ®¨ ¤ ˜È˜¯Â ´¦ ¨ § ˙Á‡ −© © ÔÓL ¤ ²¤ ÌÁÏ ¤ ¬¤
thigh. 27He placed all these on the palms of
-˙‡¤ Ôzi ´¥ ¦ © 27 :ÔÈÓi‰ « ¦ ¨ © ˜BL ¬ ÏÚ −© § ÌÈ·ÏÁ‰ ½¦ ¨ £ ´©
Aaron and on the palms of his sons, and elevated
them as an elevation offering before the L. ®¨ ¨ Ètk
ÂÈ· ´¥ © ÏÚ −© § Ô¯‰‡ Ÿ ½ £ © Ètk ´¥ © ÏÚ© µ Ïk‰ Ÿ½ ©
28Then Moses took them from their hands and Áwi ¸© ¦ © 28 :‰Â‰È «¨ § ÈÙÏ ¬¥ § ¦ ‰Ùez −¨ § Ì˙‡ ²¨ Ÿ Ûi ¤ ¯¨ ©
turned them into smoke on the altar with the ‰ÁaÊn‰ ¨ −¥ § ¦ © ¯Ë˜i ¬¥ § © © ̉Ètk ¤½ ¥ © ÏÚÓ ´© ¥ ÆÌ˙‡ ¨ Ÿ ‰LÓ ³¤ Ÿ
burnt offering. This was an ordination offering
©Ÿ ½ ¦ ÁȯÏ
ÁÁÈ © ´¥ § Æ̉¥ ÌȇlÓ ¬ ¦ ª ¦ ‰ÏÚ‰-ÏÚ ®¨ Ÿ ¨ ©
for a pleasing odor; it was a gift to the L.
29Moses took the breast and elevated it as an el- -˙‡¤ ƉLÓ ¤ Ÿ Áwi ³© ¦ © 29 :‰Â‰ÈÏ «¨ © ‡e‰− ‰M‡ ¬¤ ¦
evation offering before the L; it was Moses’ ÏÈ‡Ó ´¥ ¥ ‰Â‰È ®¨ § ÈÙÏ ´¥ § ¦ ‰Ùe˙ −¨ § e‰ÙÈÈ ¬¥ ¦ § © ‰ÊÁ‰ ¤½ ¨ ´¤
portion of the ram of ordination—as the L ‰eˆ ¬¨ ¦ ¯L ²¤ ‡k£ © ‰ÓÏ ¨½ ¨ § Ɖȉ ¨ ¨ ‰LÓÏ ³¤ Ÿ § Ìȇln‰ À¦ ª ¦ ©
had commanded Moses. :‰LÓ «¤ Ÿ -˙‡¤ ‰Â‰È −¨ §
30And Moses took some of the anointing oil
»Ìc‰-ÔÓe ¨ © ¦ ‰ÁLn‰ À̈ § ¦ © ÔÓMÓ ¤ ´¤ ¦ ‰LÓ ¤¹ Ÿ Áwi ¸© ¦ © 30 ÈÚÈ·˘
and some of the blood that was on the altar and
ÂÈ„‚a ½¨ ¨ § -ÏÚ© ÆÔ¯‰‡-ÏÚ Ÿ £ © «© Êi ³© © ¼ÁaÊn‰-ÏÚ
© ¥ § ¦ © © ¯L ´¤ ‡ £
sprinkled it upon Aaron and upon his vest-
ments, and also upon his sons and upon their Lc˜È ³¥ © § © Bz‡ ® ¦ ÂÈ· −¨ ¨ È„‚a ¬¥ § ¦ -ÏÚ © § ÂÈa ²¨ ¨ -ÏÚ ©§
vestments. Thus he consecrated Aaron and his ¬¥ § ¦ -˙‡Â
È„‚a ¤ § ÂÈa ²¨ ¨ -˙‡Â ¤ § ÂÈ„‚a ½¨ ¨ § -˙‡¤ ÆÔ¯‰‡-˙‡ Ÿ £ © «¤
vestments, and also his sons and their vest- :Bz‡ « ¦ ÂÈ· −¨ ¨
ments.
´ § © ÂÈa
eÏMa À̈ ¨ -χ ¤ § Ô¯‰‡-ÏŸ ´ £ © ‡¤ ‰LÓ ¤¹ Ÿ ¯Ó‡i ¤ Ÿ ¸ © 31
31Moses said to Aaron and his sons: Boil the
27. all these Included here among the parts 30. A mix of anointing oil and sacrificial
of the sacrifice burned on the altar was the thigh, blood was sprinkled on Aaron and his sons and on
which belonged to the priests (Lev. 7:32). In the their vestments. This completed their ordination.
rites of ordination, the priests surrendered their 31. Moses instructed Aaron and his sons on
own portion to God, because it would have been how to dispose of Moses’ own portion of the sac-
improper for them to benefit from what was of- rifice. It was vital to the efficacy of the ordination
fered on their own behalf. Moses, however, re- sacrifice that the priests actually partake of it.
ceived his portion. 33. The priests were not inside the tent but,
rather, near its entrance, in the inner section of 35. the Lord’s charge To follow the instruc-
the tabernacle courtyard. They were not to leave tions given on this occasion.
this sanctified area for seven days, to avoid contact
with anything or anyone impure.
33. seven days These days parallel the God demands absolute justice, there can be no
seven days of Creation. The existence of the world. If God desires a world, there cannot be
tabernacle and its capacity to atone for human absolute justice” (Lev. R. 10:1).
sinfulness and imperfection make it possible 36. As is often true, the parashah con-
for an imperfect world to survive in the sight cludes on a positive note—in this case, by high-
of a just God. The Midrash emphasizes that “if lighting the priests’ faithful obedience to God.
The prophet Jeremiah delivered a Temple sermon ferings (olot) are to be entirely consumed upon
( Jer. 7:1–20), in which he announced God’s the altar (Lev. 1:1–9). Thus it is best to follow
judgment of doom upon the Temple and upon those commentators who regard Jeremiah’s words
the nation for the people’s moral sins and for pa- as an altogether ironic “instruction,” implying
gan worship. The first part of this haftarah follows that the people may as well desecrate the burnt
that sermon as part of a series of prophetic re- offering (olah) for all that it is worth, because God
bukes. The last part of this haftarah skips ahead did not command them about burnt offerings or
to the end of chapter 9 to conclude the reading sacrifice during the wilderness sojourn.
on a positive note of religious instruction. The This interpretation has evoked consternation
haftarah does not fulfill the usual requirement of and perplexity for generations of interpreters, be-
having at least 21 verses. The Talmud justifies cause Lev. 7:37–38 (at the end of the parashah)
this situation with the laconic comment that states explicitly that the cultic instructions were
the unit is brief because “the topic is concluded” given during the Sinai sojourn.
(BT Meg. 23b). A solution to the problem posed by this ap-
Rhetorical forms of negation and contrast em- parent contradiction between Jeremiah and the
phasize the theme of proper action that dominates Torah was proposed by Radak: Only the Deca-
the haftarah. Thus, in the opening critique of the logue (and not the sacrificial cult) was com-
nation, God first says “I did not speak with them manded at Mount Sinai, to teach the nation that
or command them” concerning sacrifices. This is the unconditional obligations of morality consti-
contrasted with the positive assertion about “what tute the cornerstone of the Covenant. In this sense
I commanded them” to do (vv. 22–23). In this Jeremiah’s words are historically accurate and re-
rebuke, unbidden and excessive offerings are jux- inforce a central covenantal concern. In light of
taposed with the command to follow the divine the centrality of the Decalogue, the prophet’s
way. Similarly, at a later point, God maligns the point would then be that voluntary (individual)
people’s idolatrous and heinous acts of child- sacrifices offered by people who commit acts of
sacrifice, emphasizing in counterpoint that “I disobedience to the divine are as good as worth-
never commanded” such behavior (v. 31). A fur- less. In fact, he suggests, they are no more effica-
ther example of this structure occurs in the cious than if they were offered incorrectly.
concluding instruction of the haftarah. In it Strikingly, the final verse of the haftarah (9:23)
the prophet contrasts self-glorification through echoes the prophet Hosea’s statement of what
money and might with acts of kindness and jus- God desires (“I desire goodness, not sacrifice; /
tice. The rhetorical phrasing sharply juxtaposes Obedience to God, rather than burnt offerings,”
false and worthless assertions of glory (al yithallel ) Hos. 6:6). One can hardly avoid the conclusion
with their positive counterpart ( yithallel ) and that the Sages selected Jeremiah’s teaching in
teaching (9:22–23). The harsh condemnation of 9:22–23 as a climax to the haftarah in light of the
cultic activity found in 7:21–22 goes far beyond earlier haftarah verses emphasizing God’s will and
the rejection of sacrifices found in 6:19–20. The the nullity of sacrifices. Indeed, by concluding the
people are told, in a mocking fashion, to act in haftarah on this note, rabbinic tradition provides
a manner that blatantly contradicts the law in the a strong contrast to the teachings of the parashah,
Torah, which states explicitly that the burnt of- and a sharp qualification of its status.
7 JEREMIAH
21Thus
said the L of Hosts, the God of
Israel: Add your burnt offerings to your other
®¥ ¨ § ¦ ȉÏ
χ¯NÈ
:¯N· «¨ ¨ eÏ·Â
´¥ Ÿ ‡ ¡ ˙B‡·ˆ
¬ § ¦ § ÌÎÈÁ·Ê-ÏÚ
− ¨ § ‰Â‰È
−¤ ¥ § ¦ © eÙÒ
¬¨ § ¯Ó‡ ²© ¨ ‰k
¬ § ÌÎÈ˙BÏÚ
Ÿ ¬ 21
²¤ ¥ Ÿ
æ
sacrifices and eat the meat! 22For when I freed
Ÿ ´ § ÆÌÎÈ˙B·‡-˙‡
‡Ï ¤ ¥ « £ ¤ Èz¯a„-‡Ï ¦ § ³© ¦ Ÿ « Èk¦  22
your fathers from the land of Egypt, I did not
ı¯‡Ó ¤ ´¤ ¥ Ì˙B‡ −¨ ¬¦ ¦
ȇȈB‰ ‡ÈˆÂ‰ ÌBÈa ² § ÌÈ˙Èeˆ ½¦ ¦ ¦
speak with them or command them concerning
burnt offerings or sacrifice. 23But this is what -̇«¦ Èk´¦ 23 :Á·Ê © «¨ ¨ ‰ÏBÚ−¨ ȯ·c-ÏÚ ¬¥ § ¦ © ÌȯˆÓ ¦ ®¨ § ¦
I commanded them: Do My bidding, that I may Ÿ ¥ Ì˙B‡
Æ¯Ó‡Ï ³¨ ¦ ¸¦ ¦ ‰f‰
È˙Èeˆ ¤ © Â ¯·c‰-˙‡´¨ ¨ © ¤
be your God and you may be My people; walk Ìz‡Â−¤ © § ÌÈ‰Ï ¦½ Ÿ ‡Ï «¥ ÆÌÎÏ ¤ ¨ È˙ÈȉÂ
¦ ³¦ ¨ § ÈÏB˜· ¦½ § eÚÓL ´ § ¦
only in the way that I enjoin upon you, that it
ÆC¯c‰-ÏÎa
¤ Ƥ © ¨ § ÌzÎω ¤À § © £ © ÌÚÏ ®¨ § ÈÏ-eȉz ´¦ § «¦
may go well with you. 24Yet they did not listen
or give ear; they followed their own counsels,
:ÌÎÏ «¤ ¨ ·ËÈÈ ¬© ¦ ÔÚÓÏ © −© § ÌÎ˙‡ ¤½ § ¤ ‰eˆ‡ ´¤ © £ ¯L ´¤ ‡ £
the willfulness of their evil hearts. They have ÆeÎÏi ¨½ § ¨
§ «¥ © Ìʇ-˙‡ ´ ¦ Ÿ « § ÆeÚÓL
¤ eh‰-‡Ï § «¨ ‡Ï Ÿ ³ § 24
gone backward, not forward, 25from the day ¬ § ¦ © Ú¯‰
eȉi ®¨ ¨ ÌaÏ ´¨ ¦ ˙e¯¯La − ¦ § ¦ ˙BˆÚÓa ½ ¥Ÿ ´ §
your fathers left the land of Egypt until today. ¯L¤̧ ‡£ ÌBi‰-ÔÓÏ À © ¦ § 25 :ÌÈÙÏ « ¦ ¨ § ‡Ï Ÿ ¬ § ¯BÁ‡Ï − ¨§
And though I kept sending all My servants, the
ÌBi‰ ´ © „Ú −© ÌȯˆÓ ¦ ½© § ¦ ı¯‡Ó ¤ ´¤ ¥ ÆÌÎÈ˙B·‡ ¤ ¥ « £ e‡ˆÈ̈ ³ §
prophets, to them daily and persistently, 26they
would not listen to Me or give ear. They stif-
´© ¨ £ ¨ -˙‡¤ ÆÌÎÈÏ
È„·Ú-Ïk ¤ ¥‡ £ ÁÏL ³© § ‡Â ¤ ¨ ‰f‰ ®¤ ©
fened their necks, they acted worse than their ‡BÏ ³ § 26 :ÁÏL ©Ÿ « ¨ § ÌkL‰ ¬¥ § © ÌBÈ− Ìȇȷp‰ ½¦ ¦ § ©
fathers. ÆeL˜i § © © Ìʇ-˙‡
®¨ § ¨ ¤ eh‰ − ¦ ‡Ï Ÿ ¬ § ÈÏ©½ ‡¥ ÆeÚÓL § ¨
haftarah for tzav :Ì˙B·‡Ó«¨ £ ¥ eÚ¯‰ −¥ ¥ Ìt¯Ú-˙‡ ¨½ § ¨ ¤
27You shall say all these things to them, but
29–34. Lament and judgment for apostasy. [evrato]”) is similar to the language bespeaking the
Two crimes are named: setting abominations in divine rejection of the shrine of Shilo in Ps. 78:59.
the Temple and sacrificing children. Both are men- The common phraseology clearly derives from a
tioned in connection with Manasseh (2 Kings rhetorical tradition of doom sayings.
21:4–7). 33. Exposure of the dead was considered a
29. The language of this statement of doom great dishonor and desecration throughout the
(“For the Lord has spurned [ma•as] and cast off ancient world. The Assyrian king Ashurbanipal,
[va-yittosh] / The brood that provoked His wrath recording his action against Susa, the capital of
Etz Hayim: Torah and Commentary
Copyright © 2001 by the Rabbinical Assembly
629 JEREMIAH 8:2 Á ‰ÈÓ¯È
the priests, of the prophets, and of the inhab- ¹¦ £ Ÿ © ˙BÓˆÚ-˙‡Â
Ìȉk‰ ¸ § © ¤ § ÁÂȯN-˙BÓˆÚ ¨¨ § ©
itants of Jerusalem shall be taken out of their ˙BÓˆÚ ¬ § © ˙‡Â ²¥ § Ìȇȷp‰ À¦ ¦ § © ˙BÓˆÚ ´ § © | ˙‡Â ´¥ §
graves 2and exposed to the sun, the moon, and
ÁÌeÁËLe ¨ § 2 :̉ȯ·wÓ «¤ ¥ § ¦ ¦ ÌÏLe¯È-È·LBÈ ¦ −¨ ¨ § «¥ §
all the host of heaven which they loved and
¯L¤̧ ‡£ ÌÈÓM‰¦ ©À ¨ © ‡·ˆ ´¨ § | ÏÎÏe Ÿ ´ § Á¯iÏ © ¹¥ ¨ © § LÓMÏ ¤ ¤̧ ©
served and followed, to which they turned and
bowed down. They shall not be gathered for re- ´ § ¨ ƯL
eÎω ¤ ‡Â£ «© ÆÌe„·Ú ¨ £ ¯L ³¤ ‡Â £ © Ìe·‰‡ ¹ ¥£
burial; they shall become dung upon the face − £ © § « ¦ ¯L
eÂÁzL‰ ¬¤ ‡Â
£ © ÌeL¯c ½ ¨ § ¯L ´¤ ‡Â £ © ̉ȯÁ‡ ¤½ ¥ £ «©
of the earth. 3And death shall be preferable to ¤ Ÿ ² § e¯·wÈ
ÔÓ„Ï ¥½ ¨ ¦ ‡Ï Ÿ ´ § ÆeÙÒ‡È § «¨ ¥ ‡Ï Ÿ ³ ̉Ï̈ ®¤
life for all that are left of this wicked folk, in
Æ˙ÂÓ¤ ƨ ¯Á·Â ¬© § ¦ § 3 :eÈ‰È « § « ¦ ‰Ó„‡‰ −¨ ¨ £ ¨ Èt-ÏÚ ¬¥ § ©
all the other places to which I shall banish
-ÔÓ¦ Ìȯ‡Lp‰ ½ ¦ ¨ § ¦ © Æ˙ȯ‡M‰ ¦ ¥ § © ÏÎÏ Ÿ À § ÌÈiÁÓ ½ ¦ © «¥
them—declares the L of Hosts.
³ Ÿ § © ¨ § ˙‡f‰
˙BÓ˜n‰-ÏÎa Ÿ® © ‰Ú¯‰ −¨ ¨ «¨ ‰ÁtLn‰ ¬¨ ¨ § ¦ ©
¬¨ § ̇
‰Â‰È −ª § ÌL ¨½ ÌÈzÁc‰ ´ ¦ § © ¦ ¯L ´¤ ‡ £ ÆÌȯ‡Lp‰ ¦¨ § ¦©
Ò :˙B‡·ˆ « ¨ §