Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter - 8
Chapter - 8
Chapter- 8
TEST METHODS
One crude measure, still sometimes used today, is to find how much
a material elongates before it fails i.e. elongation.
However keeping track of the area under the curve may not be
practical for the field engineers.
This method does give some feel of the toughness of the material
but is not rigorous. Hence it is used only when modern techniques
are not available.
Fracture toughness tests (i.e. KIC, JIC, etc) rigorously considers crack
tip sharpening effects as well as selection of specimen size.
Vikas Chaudhari BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
INTRODUCTION Slide # 7
Four kinds of test specimens are used i.e. Compact Tension (CT),
Single Edge Notch Bend (SENB), Arc-shaped Tension (AT) and
Disc-shaped Compact Tension (DCT).
DCT specimen is suitable for circular blanks, round bars, cores, etc.
Vikas Chaudhari BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
KIc-TEST TECHNIQUE
Various Test Specimens Slide # 11
One way to choose very thick specimen but that is not convenient,
economical and feasible
An ideal crack should have a zero radius curvature at the tip
because it is the worst case scenario (the stresses near the tip are
highest and the material is weakest against fracture failure)
and
Kf(max) ≤ 0.6 KQ
If not, another guess for KQ is made, next specimen is prepared with
modified dimensions, and the entire test is repeated. Note that it is a
trial and error method.
Vikas Chaudhari BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
KIc-TEST TECHNIQUE
Comments on Plane Strain KIc-Test Slide # 23
For tough materials with low yield stress (i.e. mild steel, nuclear reactor steel,
commercially available aluminum), KIc test is not practical due to high thickness
requirement.
High alloy steels (high yield strength & low toughness) have numerous
applications in the field of engineering need KIc data.
Also toughness depends on the direction of crack front. For example, a
through-the-thickness crack growing in rolling direction is less tough in
comparison to a crack advancing in the direction of the width of the plate.
A KIc test is costly, it needs a well trained person to design specimens, growing
a crack through a fatigue load is expensive and time consuming. As a result, not
many laboratories are equipped to conduct KIc test.
The J-Integral has been developed to account for elastic-plastic behavior of the
material in the plastic zone near the crack tip.
Methods to find JIc are quite different from the procedure of finding KIc
On the other hand, a specimen of much smaller thickness for JIc test can be
chosen with a large plastic zone size at the vicinity of the crack tip
Vikas Chaudhari BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus
TEST METHODS TO DETERMINE JIc
Graphical Interpretation Slide # 25
For the case of constant u, external work Wext is zero and expression of JI becomes
where ao is the initial crack length, A is area under P – u curve from CT- specimen
and where is defined as
JIc tests is expensive because several specimens should be used to draw the R-
line.
Further each experiment should be prepared carefully with the expensive
fatigue crack growth.
Measurement of crack extension involves expenses (Heat tinting or use a dye
penetrant or thermal shock).
JIc test helps in reducing the size of a test specimen
If we take f = ys
The slope of the u -P curve up to point A gives the compliance; the load at point
A is the critical load Pc for the crack length.
Next to find compliance for the increased crack length, the specimen is loaded
The unloading curve is usually not linear and is ignored.
The specimen is loaded again to have further crack growth by a small distance.
The loading curve gives the compliance of the increased crack length with
critical load at point D.
Compliance and critical load are determined by repeating the process several
times
GI of DCB specimen is given
By taking log, graph of C versus a can be fitted in to a st. line whose slope is 3
A1 can be obtained from C versus a graph
GIc is a material property and Pc and a are the only two variables in the above
expression, let A2 is product of these variables A2 = Pc a
and
By taking log, Pc versus a can be fitted in st. line and A2 can be determined
The geometry of the specimen is similar to one adopted for KIc-test. However,
the V-notch preferred
Example1
Consider a DCB specimen made of fiber
composite laminate whose cantilevers are
pulled in a tensile machine for several crack
lengths as shown in Figure.
Determine GIc if the specimen thickness is B =
25 mm.
Solution: Crack length a, compliance C and critical load Pc are determined from the
given Figure and tabulated in the table along with the logarithmic values. Plots of
ln (C) vs ln(a) and ln(Pc) vs ln(a) are shown in the following figures along with the best
fit lines of slopes 3 and -1. Through regression analysis (Appendix 8A), we have:
Example 2
A single-edge-cracked bend specimen is
loaded in a 3-point bend fixture and variation
of centre load with CMOD is recorded. The
span of the bend fixture is S =200 mm for the
specimen of width W = 50 mm, thickness B =
25 mm, and crack length a = 25 mm. P-
CMOD record of the test is shown in figure.
Determine CTODc following British Standard
BS 5762 if E = 207 GPa, v = 0.29, and ys=
600 MPa.
Solution
From figure, Pc= 26600 N (through 5% secant
line)
Also, S = 0.2 m, W = 0.05 m, B = 0.025 m, a =
0.025 m, E = 207 x 103 MPa, v = 0.29
Prob. 1
Prob. 2
Prob. 3
Prob. 3
Thank You!