Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FME 522 THERMODYNAMICS V-Section I Notes
FME 522 THERMODYNAMICS V-Section I Notes
COURSE OUTLINE
1. Thermodynamics of State
- The perfect gas equation and use of gas table at low pressures
- Other equations of state
- The principle of corresponding states and use of compressibility charts
- Algebraic Equations of state for incompressible liquids
- Differential equations of state
Coefficients of thermal and volume expansion.
Specific heats.
- Maxwell equations
- Joule-Thomson’s Coefficient
- Clausius-Claypeyron equation.
2. Non-reacting Mixtures and Psychometry
- Gaseous mixture and gas laws
- Perfect gas mixtures
- Ideal gas and Vapour mixtures
- Fundamental parameters of water/air mixtures
- Adiabatic saturator and psychrometric chart
- Moist air processes
- Air-Conditioning processes
- Cooling towers.
3. Fuels and Combustion
- Fundamentals of reaction mixtures and definitions
- Fuel and product analysis and chemical balance equations
- Consistent enthalpy and energy scales and use of thermochemical Tables
- Heat of reaction
- Adiabatic flame temperature
- Chemical equilibrium and dissociation
- Fuels for internal combustion engines.
4. Internal Combustion Engines
- S.I. and C.I. engine
- Performance characteristics
- Combustion in I.C.Es.
References
1. Eastop T.D. and McConkey A. (1993) Applied Thermodynamics for Engineering
Technologists, Prentice and Hall, 4th Ed.
2. Rogers G.F.C. & Mayhew Y.R. (1992) Engineering Thermodynamics, Longman
Singapore Publishers, 4th Ed.
3. Kyle, B.G. (2004) Chemical and Process Thermodynamics. Prentice Hall.
4. Perry’s Chemical Engineers Handbook, 7th Edition. McGraw Hill.
Page 1 of 31
I. THERMODYNAMICS OF STATE
Objectives:
(a) Establish how to solve thermodynamic problems for real substances given heat
capacity data and PVT data (Equation of state).
(b) How to construct thermodynamic property chart from experimental given heat
capacity data and PVT data.
m
p, T, v
h, u
W
s
Q x
Thermodynamic system
Page 2 of 31
❑
( ∂T∂ h )
e.g. dh=c p dT ∨c p=
p
du=c dT ∨c =(
∂T )
∂u
v v ; (heat capacity coefficients) 1.3
v
( ∂∂ VP ) =0 ; (incompressible fluid)
T
1.5
For a single component, single phase system, the system can be described completely by
specifying the initial and final values of any two independent intensive variables (properties).
Certain intensive properties e.g. P and T are easier to measure than others. Therefore, for
most problems we seek to specify the state of the system by its temperature and pressure,
rather than its specific volume, internal energy, entropy etc. We the therefore look for
interactions between fluid properties that allow one to eliminate some thermodynamic
variables in terms of easier to measure ones.
For example, noting that h and u are functions of T only, and not p and v, the values of H and
U found in property tables are stated from a reference state for which H and U are arbitrarily
set at zero. The choice of property table or chart can be guided by properties under
consideration as follows: h-s diagram (Mollier chart) for turbines
h-p diagram for refrigeration
T-s diagram for engine cycles, etc.
For multi-component and multi-phase systems, the sixth balance equation becomes
I II
x A + x A =1
I I
x A + x B =1 1.6
Where A-B are components, and I-II are phases.
The energy equation (1.1) is valid regardless of which phase is present, hence there should be
no difficulty in its use for multi-phase or phase change systems. If θ^ is any intensive property
such as u, h etc., then the value of the property for a multi-phase system is given by
n
^ 1I θ^ I + x II2 θ^ II +…=∑ x i θ^ i
θ=x 1.7
i=1
Page 3 of 31
Other common property expressions using θ^ and partial values, e.g. ( )
∂ θ^
∂ xi x
II
=θ^ are as given in
i
Eqn. 1.3. It should be noted that most of the derived intensive properties are actually
functions of the primary properties.
The state variables can be combined to form compound state variables as in the case of
properties that define equilibrium. These properties are:
(a) Helmholtz free energy function, A
A=U−Ts
Any two of the above variables for a pure single-phase system completely defines the system.
Page 4 of 31
usually displayed on a P-V diagram on which constant temperature curves are drawn. Figure
1.1 shows a general behaviour of a pure fluid in 2-D plot.
Let’s consider a sealed tube with a liquid-vapour mixture of a pure substance, represented by
a point A (T, P). If the temperature is raised, the point representing the state of the system
moves along the vapour-pressure line (AC) until one of the following three things happens.
(i) If the overall density is greater than that of critical point, the meniscus separating
the phases will rise in the vertically held tube until a point B, where the tube
contains all the liquid. On further heating, the system traces a path along liquid
isochore BE.
(ii) If the overall density is less than that of critical density, the meniscus falls on
heating until point D is reached, where the tube contains all vapour. Further
heating moves the system along a vapour isochore DG.
Page 5 of 31
(iii) If the tube is charged with exactly the critical density, the meniscus remains near
the centre of the tube until the critical point C is reached, where it disappears. On
further heating, the system follows a critical isochore, CF. The isochore has the
same slope as the vapour-pressure curve at the critical point.
The sealed-tube, disappearing meniscus technique has widely been used to determine the
critical temperature of substances. The fluid phase lying beyond the critical points (i.e. T>T C,
P> PC) is known as the supercritical fluid. The supercritical fluid has a density close to that of
a normal liquid but possesses a much lower viscosity and a higher diffusivity. This facilitates
mass transport, and thus supercritical fluids find application in use as extraction and leaching
solvents. Mostly, CO2 and water are used as supercritical fluids due to their availability and
low critical temperatures.
The experimental determination of PVT data is obtained by either:
(i) Measurement of pressure as a function of volume at a series of fixed temperatures,
or
(ii) Measurement of pressure as a function of temperature at a series of fixed volumes.
Though easily to conceptualise, to obtain data of sufficient accuracy for thermodynamic
calculations, a fairly complex apparatus an painstaking techniques are used (e.g. Beattie’s
PVT apparatus).
( P+
a
V )
2
( V −b )=RT 1.9
RT a
Or P= − 2 1.10
V −b V
Page 6 of 31
The constants a and b are a measure of how a fluid deviates from ideal gas assumptions (i.e.
particles are perfectly elastic and rigid, volume occupied by particles is small compared to the
total volume, attractive forces between particles are negligible). It is applicable for both
a
vapour and liquids. The term 2 accounts for attractive forces between molecules, while −b
V
is a correction for the volume occupied by the molecules. Table 1.2 below gives values for a
and b for some common gases.
Table 1.2
Gas a (m6/mol.2) b (m3/mol.) × 103
O2 0.1381 3.184
N2 0.1368 3.864
H2O 0.5542 3.051
CH4 0.2303 4.306
CO 0.1473 3.951
CO2 0.3658 4.286
NH3 0.4253 3.737
H2 0.0248 2.660
He 0.00346 2.376
Page 7 of 31
(iv) The Virial Equation
The Virial equation expresses the compressibility factor Z (= PV/RT) as a power series in
density or reciprocal of volume and can be derived from statistical mechanics.
Pv B C
i.e. Z= =1+ + 2 +… 1.14
RT v v
Where B and C are called the 2 nd and 3rd virial coefficients and are functions of temperature
only.
( )
3
C0 Cρ (
1+γ ρ ) e
2
2 3 6 2 −γ P
P=RTρ + β 0 RT −A 0− 2
ρ + ( bRT−a ) ρ +aα ρ + 2 1.15
T T
Page 8 of 31
Note:
The principle of corresponding states does not specify the functionability of the relationship
between the reduced property and reduced temperature and pressure, but it simply states that
a relationship should exist. The actual relationship must be determined from experimental
observations of many compounds.
The equations PV = ZRT and PV = nRT, which represent the functionability Z = Z(T r, Pr, Zc)
constitute a generalized equation of state in which the functionability can be stated as;
f ( P , v , T ; T c , Pc , Z c )=0 1.18
Once the three characterizing parameters T c , Pc , Z c are known, the PVT data behaviour of
any substance can be estimated.
The Peng-Robinson Equation (1.13) is commonly used to fit experimental PVT data, in
which the constants are evaluated as follows.
2 2
R Tc
a ( T c )=0.45724 , and 1.19
Pc
RTc
b=0.07780 1.20
Pc
It can be observed that b is a constant, and a is a function of temperature T and eccentric
factor, ω according to the relation,
a ( T )=a ( T c ) . α ( T , ω ) 1.21
The form of the function α has been determined by fitting vapour pressure data for many non-
polar substances to be;
√ α =1+k 1−
T
[ √ ] Tc
1.22
Page 9 of 31
a (T ) P Pb
Where A= 2 , B=
( RT ) RT
And the parameter A and B can be generalized to
Pr
[ 1+ k (1−T )]
2
1 /2
A=0.45724 2 r
T r
Pr
B=0.07780
Tr
Note:
For cubic equations, three roots are possible. For the modified Van der walls equations, there
are three real roots to T < Tc, of which the middle one is unstable. The other two represent the
Z-values for liquid and vapour conditions.
i.e Z bp< Z dp
Example 1.1
Find the density of chlorine gas, CL2 at a pressure of 155 bar and temperature of 521 K using,
(a) Compressibility factor chart (401 kg/m3)
(b) Generalized Peng-Robinson Equation of state (394 kg/m3)
Page 10 of 31
∂ cp
| |
2
∂V
=−T 2 1.26
∂P T ∂T P
∂ cv
| |
2
∂ P
=T 2 1.27
∂V T ∂T V
Applying Eqns. 1.26 and 1.27, let’s consider the situation in which we have data for c p as
a function of temperature at pressure P 1, and we want cp as a function of temperature at a
pressure P2. From Eqn. 1.26, we have;
∂ cp
| | |
2 2
∂V ∂ V
=−T 2 or d c p=−T 2
dP
∂P T ∂T P ∂T P
Integrating between P1 and P2, at a constant temperature T, we have
P 2 ,T
∫ d c p =c p ( P 2 , T )−c p ( P1 ,T )
P1 ,T
P2 ,T
Or c p ( P2 ,T )=c p ( P1 ,T ) + ∫ d c p
P1 ,T
|
P2 ,T
∂2 V
¿ c p ( P1 , T )−T ∫ ∂T P
2
dP 1.28
P1 ,T
Similarly,
|
V 2 ,T
∂2 P
c v ( V 2 ,T )=c v ( V 1 , T )+ T ∫ ∂T V
2
dV 1.29
V 1 ,T
Note that the last term in Equations 1.28 and 1.29 comes for an EOS. In practice, heat
capacity data are tabulated for states at very low pressure or very large specific volumes
where fluids approach ideal gases.
¿ ¿
i.e. c p ( P→ 0 , T )=c p (T ), and c v ( V → ∞ , T ) =c v (T )
|
P2 ,T
∂2V
¿
c p ( P2 ,T )=c ( T )−T
p ∫ 2
∂T P
dP 1.30
P1 ,T
|
V2, T
∂2 P
¿
c v ( V 2 ,T )=c ( T ) +T
v ∫ ∂T V
2
dV 1.31
V1, T
¿ ¿
The values of c p ( T ) and c v ( T ) are available in Tables such as Perry’s. The information is
presented in the form;
Page 11 of 31
¿ 2
c p ( T ) =a0 + a1 T +a2 T + … 1.32
¿ 2
c v ( T )=b0 +b 1 T +b2 T + … 1.33
∫ dh=h ( T 2 , P2 ) −h ( T 1 , P1 )
1
T 2 , P1
Path I: ¿ ∫ c p dT
T 1 , P1
( | ) dP
T 2 , P2
∂V
Path II: ¿ ∫ V −T
∂T
T 2 , P1 P
|
P
∂2V
Also, c p=c¿p −T ∫ ∂T2 P
dP
P=0
[ | ]
T2 T2 P 2
Thus, c p dT =∫ c dT −∫
¿
p ∫ T ∂ V2 dP dT
T1 T1 P=0 ∂T P
[ | ] | )dP
T2 T2 T 2 , P2
(
P 2
∂V ∂V
∴ ∆ h=∫ c ¿p dT−∫ T ∫ 2
dP dT + ∫ V −T 1.34
T1 T1 0 ∂T P T ,P ∂T 2 1
P
(b) ΔS
For change in entropy S (T, P), we have;
ds=
∂S
∂T P |
dT +
∂S
∂P T
dP |
¿
cp
T
dT −
∂V
∂T | dPP
Page 12 of 31
|
p 2
∂ V
Introducingc p=c ( T )−T
¿
p ∫ 2
∂T P
dP , we have;
p =0
| | dP
T 2 , P0 P0 , T 1 P2 ,T 2
c ¿p ( T ) ∂V ∂V
∆ S= ∫ T
dT − ∫
∂T
dP− ∫ ∂T
1.35
T 1 , P0 P ,T 1 1
P P0 ,T 2 P
II I III
I II III
Path: P1 ,T 1 P0 , T 1 P0 , T 2 P2 ,T 2
P0 T 2 , P0 P2 ,T 2
∂V ∂V
∫ ∂ T dP ∫ c ¿p dT ∫ ∂T
dP
P1 T 1 , P0 P 0 ,T 0
(c) ΔU
Similarly,
( | ) ( | )
T1 , V ∞ T2 T 21 ,V 2
∂P ∂P
∆U= ∫ T
∂T V
−P dV +∫ c v dT + ∫ T
¿
∂T V
−P dV 1.36
T 1 ,V 1 T T ,V 1 2 ∞
I II III
Path: V 1 ,T 1 V ∞ , T1 V ∞ , T2 V 2 ,T 2
¿ ¿
Note: we need heat capacity data c p and c v at standard ideal gas state (P = 0, v = ∞) as an
equation of state to completely compute Δh, Δu, Δs, ΔG, and ΔA.
Recall that, ∆ G=∆ h−T ∆ s
∆ A=∆ u−T ∆ s
It follows that;
( |)
T,P
∂V
h−h =
IG
∫ V −T
∂T
dP 1.37
T , P=0 P
∫ ( | )
T ,P
IG ∂V R
s−s = − dP 1.38
T , P =0 ∂T P P
Equations 1.37 and 1.38 are known as departure functions. These functions are used to
predict how a real fluid departs from an ideal fluid at any T, P.
Page 13 of 31
Thus,
Δh, Δu of Δh, Δu of an Departure from ideal gas Departure of real gas from
= + -
a real fluid ideal fluid to real gas at end state ideal gas at initial sate
state
departure departure
The departure functions are computed from real gas equations of state. Using the departure
functions, thermal data equations and equations of state, fluid property tables can be
constructed.
I II III IV
P1 ,T 1 P1 ,T 1 P1 ,T 2 P2 ,T 2 P2 ,T 2
(real gas) (ideal gas) (ideal gas) (ideal gas) (real gas)
∆ s I =s 'P ,T −s P ,T =∆ s¿P ,T
1 1 1 1 1 1
∆ hII =∫ c 'p dT
T1
Page 14 of 31
T2
c 'p
∆ s II =∫ dT
T1
T
' ¿
∆ s IV =s P 2
,T 2 −s P2 , T 2 =−∆ s P2 , T 2
∆ h=∆ h ¿
P1 , T 1 +∫ c 'p dT −∆ h ¿P ,T 2 2
1.39
T1
T2
c 'p P
∆ s=∆ s P ,T +∫
¿ ¿
dT−R ln 2 −∆ s P ,T 1.40
1 1
T1
T P1 2 2
( ) ( ) ( )
¿ '
∂∆h ∂h ∂h
= −
∂P T ∂P T ∂P T
( ∂∂∆Ps ) =( ∂∂ sP ) −( ∂∂Ps )
¿ '
T T T
ZRT
v=
P
And using the reduced forms;
P=P c Pr dP=Pc d Pr
T =T c T r dT =T c d T r
It can be shown that;
Pr
∆ h¿
( )
∂Z d Pr
=T 2r ∫ 1.41
RTc 0
∂Tr Pr Pr
[ ( )] P
P2
∆ s¿ ∂Z d Pr
=∫ Z−1+T r 1.42
R 0
∂Tr r
Page 15 of 31
This method is not readily used due to large uncertainty in the reduced properties. The
correlations of the reduced residual properties are usually represented in charts.
( ∂∂ uv ) =T ( ∂∂ PT ) −P
T V
1.44
And integrating between v and v = ∞ where ideal gas behaviour is expected, we have;
[ ( ∂∂ PT ) −P ] dV
∞
u −u=∫ T
'
V V
Thus,
[ ( ) ]
V
∂P
∆ h =RT ( 1−Z ) +∫ P−T
¿
−P dV 1.45
∞ ∂T V
Likewise,
∆ s ¿=s' −s=( s' −s ∞ ) + ( s∞ −s )
Integrating separately, we have,
'
v ∞
∆ s =∫
¿
∞
( ) dV +∫( ∂∂ TP ) dV
∂P
∂T V v V
1.46
Integration of the first integral over the ideal gas range where ( ∂∂ TP ) = Rv .
V
v v
R R
The problem of limits is circumvented by adding the quantity ∫ dV −∫ dV to the r.h.s.
∞ v ∞ v
of Eqn. 1.46 to obtain;
[ ( )]
v
R ∂P v
∆ s =∫
¿
− dV −R ln ' 1.47
∞ v ∂T V v
∫[ ( ) ]
v
¿ R ∂P
Or ∆s = − dV −R ln Z 1.48
∞ v ∂T V
Page 16 of 31
∆ h¿
RTc
=2.078 ( 1+ k ) [ 1+k ( 1−√ T r ) ] ln
[
Z + ( 1+ √ 2 ) B
Z + ( 1− √ 2 ) B ]
−T r ( Z−1 ) 1.50
∆ s¿
R
=2.078 k
[
( 1+ k )
√T r
−k ln
][
Z+ ( 1+ √ 2 ) B
Z + ( 1−√ 2 ) B ]
−ln ( Z−B ) 1.51
Where:
Z3 + ( B−1 ) Z 2+ ( A−3 B2−2 B ) Z + ( B3 +B 2− AB )=0 1.52
Pr
[ 1+ k (1−T )]
2
1 /2
A=0.45724 2 r 1.53
Tr
Pr
B=0.07780 1.54
Tr
2
k =0.37464+ 1.54226 ω−0.26992 ω 1.55
¿ ¿
Equations 1.50 to 1.55 allows for the evaluation of Z, ∆ h , and∆ s at specified sets of T and P
from a knowledge of Tc, Pc and the acentric factor, ω.
Example 1.2
Estimate ∆ h¿ and∆ s ¿for chlorine gas, Cl2 at 155 bar and 521K using,
(a) Tables (3.5 cal/gmol.K, 2.13.5 cal/gmol.K)
(b) The generalized Peng-Robinson equation of state (3.63 cal/gmol.K, 2.13
cal/gmol.K)
Homework/Project
Develop a thermodynamic property chart for oxygen over a temperature range -100°C to
150°C (at intervals of 10°C) and pressure range 1 bar to 100 bar (at 10 bar intervals).
Calculate Z, v, h and s as functions of T and P, and hence prepare a plot of P-v, p-h and T-s.
Assume oxygen obeys Peng-Robinson equation of state.
RT a(T )
i.e. P= −
v−b v ( v+ b ) + ( v−b )
2 2
R Tc
a ( T )=0.45724 α (T )
Pc
RT c
b ( T )=0.7780
Pc
[ ( √ )]
2
T
α (T )= 1+ k 1−
Tc
Page 17 of 31
2
k =0.37464+ 1.54226 ω−0.26992 ω
[
hT , P−h T , P =R T c T r ( Z−1 )−2.078 ( 1+k ) √ ∝ ln
ideal
[ Z + ( 1+ √ 2 ) B
Z+ ( 1−√ 2 ) B ]]
ideal
[
sT ,P −hT , P =R ln ( Z−B )−2.078 k
( 1+ k
√ Tr
−k ln
)[
Z + ( 1+ √ 2 ) B
Z + ( 1− √2 ) B ]]
Pr
Where B=0.07780
Tr
¿ −2 −5 2 −9 3
c p=25.46 +1.519 ×10 T −0.715 ×10 T + 1.311×10 T
Required:
(a) Table of specific volumes
(b) Table of h
(c) Table of s
(d) Plots
Page 18 of 31
∆ U −T ∆ S−W ≤ 0
∆ U −T ∆ S−W ≤ 0 1.58
Two types of work can be identified in a system;
i) Work exchanged with the environment at a constant pressure due to changes in
the system, W.
ii) All other forms of work, w’ (shaft work, electric work etc).
Thus, we can rewrite Eqn. 1.58 as
'
∆ U −T ∆ S+ P ∆ V −W ≤ 0 1.59
Equations 1.58 and 1.59 are alternative forms of the Clausius inequality. Equation 1.58 is
restricted for constant temperature process, while eqn. 1.59 is useful when the surroundings
are at a constant T and P. Considering an infinitesimal change, we rewrite equation 1.59 as;
'
dU −TdS+ PdV −dW ≤ 0 1.60
Or dU =TdS−PdV (restricting system to PV work only) 1.61
dU =( ∂∂US ) dS+( ∂U
V ∂V )
dV
S
dH =( ∂∂HS ) dS+( ∂∂ HP ) dP
P S
similarly,
A=U−TS : dA=dU−TdS−SdT
G=H −TS : dG=dH−TdS−SdT
dA= ( ∂∂ VA ) dV +( ∂∂TA ) dT
T V
dG=VdP−SdT 1.64
Equations 1.61 – 1.64 allows for the establishment of a network of relationships among
thermodynamic variables. They have the form of exact differentials,
Page 19 of 31
dZ= ( ∂∂ Zx ) dx +( ∂∂ Zy ) dy
y x
1.65
( ∂∂My ) =( ∂∂Nx )
x y
1.67
Comparing equations 1.61 – 1.64 with Eqn. 1.65, the following relations are apparent:
( ∂∂US ) =( ∂∂HS ) =T
V P
1.68
( ∂∂TG ) =( ∂∂ TA ) =−S
P V
1.70
( ∂∂ GP ) =( ∂∂ HP ) =V
T S
1.71
Applying Eqn. 1.67 to equations 1.61 – 1.64 yields what are called Maxwell relations, i.e.
( ∂∂My ) =( ∂∂Nx )
x y
1.67
( ∂∂TV ) =−( ∂∂ PS )
S V
1.72
( ∂∂ TP ) =( ∂∂VS )
S P
1.73
( ∂∂ TP ) =( ∂∂VS )
V T
1.74
( ∂∂TV ) =−( ∂∂ PS )
P T
1.75
( ∂∂ HP ) =V −T ( ∂∂TV )
T P
1.75
Examples/exercises
Page 20 of 31
I.6 The Joule-Thomson Coefficient
The Joule-Thompson coefficient ( μ JT ) is defined as,
μJT = ( ∂∂ TP ) = cV ( αT −1)
H p
1.76
Derivation of μJT
μJT =μ JT ( T , P , H ). By applying the cyclic rule in terms of these variables, a useful result is
obtained;
i.e. ( ∂∂ TP ) ( ∂∂ HT ) ( ∂∂ HP ) =−1
H P T
1.77
( ∂∂ TP ) =μ
1st:
H
JT
2 :(
∂T )
∂H
nd
=c p
P
3 :(
∂H)
∂P
rd
=μ , the inverse of the isothermal Joule-Thompson Coefficient. This quantity is
T
T
Page 21 of 31
From dH =TdS+VdP , dividing by dP holding temperature constant yields,
( ∂∂ HP ) =T ( ∂∂ PS ) +V
T T
1.79
h=const .
P1 P2 P
Note:
For an iso-enthalpic (adiabatic) expansion,
For, μJT <0 , temperature increases
μJT =0, temperature remains constant
μJT >0 , temperature decreases
For a fluid undergoing a throttling process with initial states (P 1, T1), and forced to go through
a porous plug of different pore sizes, a constant enthalpy plot can be drawn in a T-P diagram
as shown in Figure 1.3.
T Constant enthalpy
line
Page 22 of 31
T1
P2 ,T 2
Figure 1.3
Plotting for several (P1, T1) states yields a plot of several constant enthalpy lines for a
substance as shown in Figure 1.4
Figure 1.4
A line joining all points of zero slope or Joule Thompson coefficient represents the inversion
curve (or line). The point at a constant enthalpy line intersects the inversion line is the
inversion temperature. With the knowledge of constant pressure specific heat, C p and PVT
behaviour of a substance, the joule-Thompson coefficient can be determined.
Exercise
1. Derive a relation for the Joule-Thompson coefficient and the inversion temperature
for a gas whose equation of state is;
( a
)
P+ 2 v=RT
v
Page 23 of 31
(a) 3 MPa and 300°C
(b) 6 Mpa and 500°C
g1 = g2
Phase 1
b
P+dP
g1 > g2
a
P Phase 2
T T+dT
Thus, if dg is the difference in Gibb’s free energy between the two points, it is the same for
both phases, i.e. dg 1=dg 2.
But, dg 1=−s1 dT + v 1 dP
dg 2=−s2 dT + v 2 dP
−s1 dT + v 1 dP=−s 2 dT +v 2 dP
dP s 2−s 1
Or, =
dT v 2−v 1
1.82
Equation 1.82 is known as the Clausius – Claypeyron equation and it relates the slope along
the coexistence line with the change of entropy and volume of a substance as it crosses the
line, i.e. changes in phases.
Page 24 of 31
Since we cannot measure entropy directly, a more useful form of the equation is obtained by
Q
using ∆ S= for an isothermal process, and finding the change in entropy at a phase
T
transition from the latent heat, L.
dP L
i.e. = (for solid-liquid phase equilibrium)
dT T ∆ V
1.83
It can also be expressed as,
ln
( )
P2 −∆ H 1 1
P1
=
R
−
T2 T1 ( )
1.84
∆ H vap ,
Or ln P=−¿ ¿ .
+C 1.85
RT
Where ΔH can either be ΔHvap. or ΔHsub. depending on the process under discussion.
T1, T2 are in Kelvin
P1, P2 can be in any units as long as they are the same.
Note: The normal boiling point is defined as the temperature at which vapour pressure is
equal to one atmosphere.
1 atm. = 1.0133 bar;
1 bar = 105 Pa = 100 kPa.
760 Torr = 101325 Pa = 101.325 kPa.
( ∂∂ TP ) =( ∂∂VS )
V T
(i)
During a phase change process, the pressure is saturation pressure, which is a function of
temperature only, and independent of the specific volume.
Page 25 of 31
Hence, the partial derivative ( ∂∂ TP )
V
can be expressed as a total derivative, ( dPdT )
sat
which is
the slope of the saturation curve on a P-T diagram. The slope ( dPdT ) is independent of volume,
and hence can be treated as a constant during the integration of eqn (i) between two saturation
states at the same temperature (e.g. isothermal saturated liquid-vapour states). For such we
can write;
( ) dP s fg
Or = (iii)
dT sat v fg
Also during phase change, the pressure remains constant, therefore, from;
dh=Tds+VdP And for dP=0 we have
g g
∫ dh=¿ ∫ Tds ¿
f f
Or h fg =T s fg
( dPdT )
h fg
= (iv),
sat T . v fg
( dPdT )
h12
= (v)
sat T v 12
Page 26 of 31
RT
And assuming vapour is an ideal gas, v g=
P
( dPdT )
Phfg
Thus, = 2
sat RT
( ) ( )
dP hfg dT
Or = (vi)
P sat R T2
For a small temperature difference, hfg can be treated as constant at some average value.
Integrating (vi) we have,
( ) ( )
P2 hfg 1 1
ln ≅ − (vii)
P1 sat R T1 T2 sat
Equation (vii) is the Clausius –Clapeyron Equation (Eqn. 1.84) derived earlier.
( ) ( )
P2 hig 1 1
ln ≅ − (viii)
P1 sat R T1 T2 sat
Example
Using the Clapeyron equations (iv) and (vii), estimate the value of the enthalpy of
vaporization of refrigerant 134a at 20°C, and compare with the tabulated value. Account for
the difference in the estimated values using the two equations.
Page 27 of 31
Appendix 1.1 Critical Constants for Selected Substances
Substance Molecular Critical Critical Critical Acentric
weight temperature, pressure, compressibility factor, ω
Tc(K) Pc (atm) factor, Zc
Helium He 4.00 5.3 2.26 0.300 -0.365
Neon Ne 20.18 44.5 26.9 0.307 -0.029
Argon A 39.94 151.0 48.0 0.291 0.001
Krypton Kr 83.7 209.4 54.3 0.291 0.005
Chlorine Cl2 70.91 417.0 76.1 0.276 0.090
Hydrogen H2 2.02 33.3 12.8 0.304 -0.218
Nitrogen N2 28.02 126.2 33.5 0.291 0.039
Oxygen O2 32.00 154.8 50.1 0.308 0.025
Carbon dioxide CO2 44.01 304.2 72.9 0.274 0.239
Carbon monoxide CO 28.01 133.0 34.5 0.294 0.066
Ethylene oxide C2H4O 44.05 468.0 71.0 0.255 0.202
Nitrous oxide N2O 44.02 309.7 71.7 0.272 0.165
Nitric oxide NO 30.01 180.0 64.0 0.251 0.588
Nitrogen peroxide NO2 46.01 431.0 100.0 0.232 0.834
Sulfur dioxide SO2 64.06 430.7 77.8 0.268 0.256
Sulfur trioxide SO3 80.06 491.4 83.8 0.262 0.481
Water H2O 18.02 647.4 218.3 0.230 0.344
Ammonia NH3 17.03 405.5 111.3 0.242 0.250
Hydrazine N2H4 32.05 653.0 145.0 - 0.316
Hydrogen cyanide HCN 27.03 456.7 53.2 0.197 0.388
Carbon disulfide CS2 76.13 552.0 78.0 0.293 0.109
Hydrogen sulfide H2S 34.08 373.6 88.9 0.283 0.081
Hydrogen chloride HCl 36.47 324.6 81.5 0.147 0.133
Methane CH4 16.04 191.1 45.8 0.289 0.011
Ethane C2H6 30.07 305.5 48.2 0.284 0.099
Propane C3H8 44.09 370.0 42.0 0.277 0.153
n-butane C4H10 58.12 425.2 37.5 0.274 0.199
Isobutene C4H10 58.12 408.1 36.0 0.283 0.183
n-pentane C5H12 72.15 469.8 33.3 0.269 0.251
Ethylene C2H4 28.05 282.4 50.0 0.268 0.089
Propene C3H6 42.08 365.0 45.6 0.276 0.144
Acetylene C2H2 26.04 309.0 61.6 0.274 0.190
Cyclohexane C6H12 84.16 553.0 40.0 0.272 0.212
Benzene C6H6 78.11 562.0 48.6 0.274 0.212
Toluene C7H8 92.13 594.0 41.6 0.273 0.263
Methyl alcohol CH4O 32.04 513.2 78.5 0.220 0.556
Ethyl alcohol C2H6O 46.07 516.0 63.0 0.248 0.644
n-propyl alcohol C3H8O 60.09 537.0 50.2 0.251 0.623
Isopropyl alcohol C3H8O 60.09 508.8 53.0 0.278 0.665
Dioxane C4H8O2 88.10 585.0 50.7 0.253 0.281
Acetone C3H6O 58.08 508.7 46.6 0.238 0.304
Ethyl methyl ketone C4H8O 72.10 533.0 39.5 0.262 0.320
Acetic acid C2H4O2 60.05 594.8 57.1 0.200 0.447
Ethyl acetate C4H8O2 88.10 523.3 37.8 0.252 0.362
Acetonitrile CH3CN 41.05 547.9 47.7 0.184 0.327
Methyl chloride CH3Cl 50.49 416.3 65.9 0.276 0.153
Chloroform CHCl3 119.39 536.6 54.0 0.294 0.218
Carbon tetrachloride CCl4 153.84 556.4 45.0 0.272 0.193
From K.A. Kobe and R.E. Lynn, Jr., “The Critical Properties of Elements and Compounds,” Chem. Rev., 52, 117 (1953) and
R.C. Reid, J.M. Prausnitz, and B.E. Poling, The properties of Gases and Liquids, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987.
Page 28 of 31
Appendix 1.2 Generalized Equation of State Plot
Page 29 of 31
Appendix 1.3 Generalized enthalpy departure from ideal gas behaviour
Page 30 of 31
Appendix 1.4 Generalized entropy departure from ideal gas behaviour
Page 31 of 31