Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Written Report - Philo
Written Report - Philo
Malolos, Bulacan
A Written Report on
BRENDA O. MASUANGAT
and
Realism, in philosophy, the viewpoint which accords to things which are known or perceived an
existence or nature which is independent of whether anyone is thinking about or perceiving.
Known or Perceived = Cognition, the states and processes involved in knowing, which in their
completeness include perception and judgment. Cognition includes all conscious and
unconscious processes by which knowledge is accumulated, such as perceiving, recognizing,
conceiving, and reasoning.
The opposition between idealism and realism, although undeniably ontological in a broad sense,
is distinct both from general disputes about realism in ontology and from disputes which turn
upon the notion of truth or its applicability to statements of some specified type (see
below Realism and truth). In its most straightforward and, arguably, basic sense, idealism not
only asserts the existence of “ideas” (and perhaps other mental entities) but also advances a
restrictive claim about the nature or composition of reality as whole: there is nothing in reality
other than ideas and the minds whose ideas they are. So understood, idealism is a form of
monism, which is opposed both to other forms of monism (e.g., materialism) and to pluralism,
which posits two or more irreducibly distinct kinds of stuff or things (e.g., mental and physical,
as in various versions of dualism).
Philosophical Agreement
Because of the relative understanding or rather a different perspective of the philosophers. In the
field of Education, it must be synthesized or must be open to agreement to understand more
accurately of the children.
Like for example, the realist view to the education is realists believe that reality exists
independent of the human mind. The ultimate reality is the world of physical objects. The focus
is on the body/objects.
Truth is objective-what can be observed. Aristotle, a student of Plato who broke with his
mentor’s idealist philosophy, is called the father of both Realism and the scientific method. In
this metaphysical view, the aim is to understand objective reality through “the diligent and
unsparing scrutiny of all observable data.”
Aristotle believed that to understand an object, its ultimate form had to be understood, which
does not change. For example, a rose exists whether or not a person is aware of it. A rose can
exist in the mind without being physically present, but ultimately, the rose shares properties with
all other roses and flowers (its form), although one rose may be red and another peach colored.
Aristotle also was the first to teach logic as a formal discipline in order to be able to reason about
physical events and aspects. The exercise of rational thought is viewed as the ultimate purpose
for humankind.
The Realist curriculum emphasizes the subject matter of the physical world, particularly science
and mathematics. The teacher organizes and presents content systematically within a discipline,
demonstrating use of criteria in making decisions.
Teaching methods focus on mastery of facts and basic skills through demonstration and
recitation. Students must also demonstrate the ability to think critically and scientifically, using
observation and experimentation.
In a search for truth, beauty, and justice that is enduring and everlasting, the focus is on
conscious reasoning in the mind. Plato, father of Idealism, espoused this view about 400 years
BC, in his famous book, The Republic.
Plato believed that there are two worlds. The first is the spiritual or mental world, which is
eternal, permanent, orderly, regular, and universal. There is also the world of appearance, the
world experienced through sight, touch, smell, taste, and sound, that is changing, imperfect, and
disorderly.
This division is often referred to as the duality of mind and body. Reacting against what he
perceived as too much of a focus on the immediacy of the physical and sensory world, Plato
described a utopian society in which “education to body and soul all the beauty and perfection of
which they are capable” as an ideal. In his allegory of the cave, the shadows of the sensory world
must be overcome with the light of reason or universal truth.
To understand truth, one must pursue knowledge and identify with the Absolute Mind. Plato also
believed that the soul is fully formed prior to birth and is perfect and at one with the Universal
Being. The birth process checks this perfection, so education requires bringing latent ideas (fully
formed concepts) to consciousness.
As we can see the mind of a philosophers is very irritated every ideas are prone to criticism
therefore it, must be open to agreement to understand more accurately mostly the children.
Philosophical Disagreements
Among the philosophies of education, there is an ongoing situation agreements for the schools
here in the Philippines but we all know that all of these are not good for the development of mind
of a child, like for example, the schism in metaphysics between educational philosophies
emphasizing change and those emphasizing the changeless widens and becomes more
unbridgeable when reinforced by theological considerations.
Those who seek to overcome the uncertainties of education in the natural order by an appeal to
certainty in the supernatural order almost put themselves out of communication with those who
insist on restricting the universe of educational discourse to the natural order.
Yet, in all sincerity, the supernaturalist does not see, for instance, how consensus on the dignity
of man can hold any secure place at the center of educational philosophy unless it have a divine
authorship.
Whatever reason for taking a rigid or intransigeant stand in one’s educational philosophy, the
ultimate and deplorable result is to breakdown communication between the adherents of
conflicting philosophies of education.
Each group seems to have its own universe of discourse, consequently they do not speak the
same educational language. Community breaks down into several communities each with its own
separate system of schools. The danger here is that separate schools systems will breed suspicion
and misunderstanding.
Conclusion:
We must remember that no worthwhile consensus is possible which violates the integrity of any
party thereto. In seeking for consensus we must have entire respect from us, even where our
differences stiffen into rigidity.
Educational Psychology
Behaviorism
Cognitivism
Social Cognitvism
Social cognitive theory, used in psychology, education, and
communication, holds that portions of an individual's knowledge
acquisition can be directly related to observing others within the
context of social interactions, experiences, and outside media
influences.
Constructivism
Conclusion:
A teacher is someone who is responsible for the growth and development of a child. He/She
needs to understand the needs, strengths and weaknesses of the child to guide them better.
Educational psychology plays a huge role in understanding the student’s learning patterns and
focuses on developing relevant curriculum and evaluation techniques. I believe that every school
must encourage their teachers to take courses in Education Psychology and even hire an in-house
psychologist. This will benefit the students a great deal.
Of course, it's of tremendous importance. A successful teacher must have idea about the
important milestones in the cognitive developmental stages of the children. Educational
Psychology helps the teacher know at what stage, a particular student is, what method should be
followed for the teaching learning process.
Many famous psychologists have laid down important theories in this regard. Jean Piaget's
theory of cognitive development consisting of four distinct stages helps a teacher tremendously
in teaching children at various stages, choosing teaching aids, at what stage a child requires
concrete objects for grasping a lesson and at what stage,he/she can learn abstract concepts.
Harvard Garner's theory of multiple intelligences helps the teacher greatly in identifying the
different types of learners. Some students can learn through visual aids, some through movement
, so on and so forth.
Thus, a good teacher should utilize the knowledge received from Educational Psychology and
keep on modifying his/her teaching methodologies.
The more you understand the human brain, the better you can teach effectively. It’s kind of like
taking an aspirin for a urinary tract infection. It may make some pain go away, reduce a fever.
But to really impact that infection, one needs an antibiotic. The more we know, the better we can
provide just the right experiences for learning.
Individual differences can be defined as personal characteristics that distinguish learners from
each other in the teaching and learning processes. Learners are unique individuals who bring a
critical set of variables to each learning situation, including delicate traits as indicators of their
potential and the history of achievement as signs of previous accomplishments and predictors
of future performance.
In psychology, these are called individual differences referring to the extent and kind of
variations or similarities among people on some of the important psychological aspects such as
intelligence, personality, interest, and aptitude.
Conclusion:
Many of a learner’s personal characteristics can affect how he or she learns. Individual
differences are often explanations for differences in learning and performance among learners.
The study of individual differences among learners’ permits is done with the idea that results can
help educators design instruction that better meets the needs of each learner’s needs.
Each learner is unique like by the age, gender, aptitude, attitude etc. The differences among the
learners are considered individual differences. Individuals follow different paths as they
progress toward expert understanding because they learn differently based on their gender,
ethnicity, learning styles, previous knowledge and experience with content, strategies, and
technology.
Based on his observations, Pavlov suggested that the salivation was a learned response. Pavlov's
dog subjects were responding to the sight of the research assistants' white lab coats, which the
animals had come to associate with the presentation of food.
The law of effect principle developed by Edward Thorndike suggested that: "responses that
produce a satisfying effect in a particular situation become more likely to occur again in
that situation, and responses that produce a discomforting effect become less likely to occur
again in that situation (Gray, 2011,)
Thorndike studied learning in animals (usually cats). He devised a classic experiment in which
he used a puzzle box (see fig. 1) to empirically test the laws of learning.
Edward Thorndike was an influential psychologist who is often referred to as the founder of
modern educational psychology. He was perhaps best-known for his famous puzzle box
experiments with cats which led to the development of his law of effect.
Thorndike would place a cat inside the puzzle box and then place a piece of meat outside the
box. He would then observe the animal's efforts to escape and obtain the food. ... Thorndike
termed this the “Law of Effect,” which suggested that when satisfaction follows an association, it
is more likely to be repeated.
Burrhus Frederic
Skinner was an American
psychologist, behaviorist,
author, inventor, and social
philosopher. He was a professor of psychology at Harvard
University from 1958 until his retirement in 1974.
Skinner was an American psychologist best-known for his influence on behaviorism. Skinner
referred to his own philosophy as 'radical behaviorism' and suggested that the concept of free
will was simply an illusion. All human action, he instead believed, was the direct result of
conditioning.
Gestalt
Gestalt psychology, gestaltism or configurationism is a school of psychology that emerged in the
early twentieth century in Austria and Germany as a theory of perception that was a rejection of
basic principles of Wilhelm Wundt's and Edward Titchener's elementalist and structuralist
psychology.
The main principles of the Gestalt Theory in Learning are: Teachers should encourage their
students to discover the relationship of the elements that make up a problem. Incongruities,
gaps, or disturbances are essential stimuli in the learning process. Educational instruction should
be based on the Laws of Organization.
Guthrie is best known for his theory that all learning was based on a stimulus–response association.
The theory was: "A combination of stimuli which has accompanied a movement will on its
recurrence tend to be followed by that movement".
Tolman is perhaps best-known for his work with rats and mazes. Tolman's work challenged the
behaviorist notion that all behavior and learning is a result of the basic stimulus-response
pattern. In a classic experiment, rats practiced a maze for several days. Then, the familiar path they
normally took was blocked.
Conclusions:
Learning theories are critical because they “help us to understand both how knowledge is created
and how people learn” Harasim (2017). While evaluating theories is not always about assessing
whether they are right or wrong, Lefrançois (2019) suggests that they can be mainly assessed by
how useful they are to educational practice.
Teachers make use of learning theories (consciously or not) and their related pedagogic
approaches and technologies to design, develop and deliver effective teaching and learning
experiences. As we design for learning, we need to be aware that our theoretical starting points
will inform our teaching practices, choice of learning technologies and the kinds of activities we
provide to our students.
Knowing who you are as a teacher before you enter the classroom will help significantly.
Teaching is so much more than just the content. Teaching is a learning curve on philosophy that
will never be finished. Just as your classroom will change every year, continue to alter your
philosophies. See what works for you and your students on a collaborative level
Adjustments are actions taken to enable a student with disability to access and participate in
education on the same basis as other students. ... They can be made at the whole-school level,
in the classroom and at an individual student level.
While intelligence is one of the most talked about subjects in psychology, there is no standard
definition of what exactly constitutes intelligence. Some researchers have suggested that
intelligence is a single, general ability. Others believe that intelligence encompasses a range of
aptitudes, skills, and talents.
What Is Intelligence?
Intelligence has been a controversial topic throughout psychology's history. Despite the
substantial interest in the subject, there is still considerable disagreement about what components
makeup intelligence. In addition to questions of exactly how to define intelligence, the debate
continues today about whether accurate measurements are even possible.
At various points throughout recent history, researchers have proposed some different definitions
of intelligence. While these definitions can vary considerably from one theorist to the next,
current conceptualizations tend to suggest that intelligence is the ability to:
Intelligence involves some different mental abilities including logic, reasoning, problem-solving,
and planning. While the subject of intelligence is one of the largest and most heavily researched,
it is also one of the topics that generate the greatest controversy.
While psychologists often disagree about the definition and causes of intelligence, research on
intelligence plays a significant role in many areas. These areas include decisions regarding how
much funding should be given to educational programs, the use of testing to screen job
applicants, and the use of testing to identify children who need additional academic help.