Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ganesh
Ganesh
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Indian History Congress is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Proceedings of the Indian History Congress
At the outset, allow me to express my sincere thanks to the Indian History Congress o
inviting me to preside over the Ancient India Session of the Indian History Congress being
held at Cuttack. It is indeed a great honour for someone who has written most of his work
in his mother tongue, and has only published a few papers in English. I have chosen in thi
address to pursue a theme in South Indian History that has occupied my attention for th
past decade that of analyzing the Early Tamil te>Āļts and corroborating the information an
insights from the texts using evidence from other Sources on Tamil History.
Early History of South India has received considerable scholarly attention in recent
years. This is because South India has witnessed processes of social and cultur
transformation different from the historical processes elsewhere in India. These processe
have included the emergence of a distinct group of Dravidian languages, formation o
linguistic communities based on them, as well as emergence and transformation of distinc
social, economic and cultural forms. These features were stressed by British colonial
administrators, scholars and Missionaries, who posited the term 'Dravidian culture' as
generic term for South Indian society and culture.1 Efforts in understanding this cultur
distinctiveness, along with the discovery of substantial amount of archaeological, epigraphical
and literary sources, facilitated research on History of South India in general and earl
History of Tamil country in particular as the prime source of 'Dravidian culture'. A survey
of the enormous literature that has been published on the early History of south India is no
intended here, and is also beyond the capabilities of the present writer.2 Tamil country o
Tamilakam that has included the present states of Kerala and Tamilnadu has long been
recognized as the region that has played the significant role in the distinctiveness of Sout
Indian society. Research on the history of early Tamilakam or Tamil country has generated
interesting debates and insights that have contributed substantially to our understanding o
the emergence of a regional identity in the context of the social transitions taking place i
the Indian subcontinent as a whole. Our attempt is to examine some of these formulation
and insights on the basis of the available evidence in order to arrive at a possible hypothesi
on the formation of the Tamil region.
more frequently as shown by the reference to the Dravida sangha founded by the Jaina
monk Vajranandi10. Thus by 5,h century terms like Dravida, Dramila or Tamil, with which
tenns like damirike can be identified, had come into being as denoting a separate region11.
The actual extent of the region is not altogether free from ambiguity. Periplus of the
Eritrean Sea refers to damirike as the region to south of the Daksinabades( daksinapatha-
Deccan), which can be reached from the sea with the ports of Naura and Tyndis12. Naura has
not been identified and Tyndis is probably the same as Tondi, one of centers of the Cheras.
This means that damirike begins from the area now part of northern Kerala. However, early
Tamil texts refer to Oonurn( Koonur in Nilgiri hills), Pazhi14, Punnad15 and Erumeyur16
which can all be located in the area around Nilgiri hills including Northern Kerala and
probably southern Karnataka. Similarly, the reference to Ilantiraiyan indicates the territory
of the later Paliavas17. All these are referred to as part of the region of the Tamil speakers,
with the speakers of other languages treated as Molipeyar Desam '* . This means that Damirike
of the Greco- Roman texts should be treated as a linguistic region.
Such a formulation is capable of generating a major debate and it has done so. One
major feature of the debate has been a question of precedence. Tamil scholars have argued
that the formation and spread of Tamil literature and culture, as revealed in the early Tamil
texts have been preceded by the emergence of Tamil language and grammar19. There have
been two versions of this argument. Some scholars inspired by Tamil 'patriotism' have
evoked the story of the three Sangams as narrated in the early medieval Tamil text Iraiyanar
ahapporul , and have maintained that the two grammarians Akattiyar and Tolkappiyar have
already been referred to in the itaichankam( middle sangam) period, that is, before the
present corpus of early Tamil songs appeared20. Others, less persuaded by Tamil Patriotism,
have maintained that Tolkappiyar, the grammarian whose text is available to us in full, have
been influenced by Sanskrit Grammarians Panini and Patanjali and possibly the jain text,
Aindra Vyakarana21. Still, they would argue for the precedence of the grammar to literature,
and some have maintained that Tolkappiyam was composed at a date not later than 500
BC22. Even those who would accept a later date for the currently available text of Tolkappiyam
have argued that an original text existed, compiled sometime in 200BCE".
There were also a few dissenting voices. They have argued that while our information
on a text by Akattiyar have been few, fragmentary and unreliable.Tolkappiyam should be
taken as the text indicative of the genesis of Tamil language. Even a cursory examination of
Tolkappiyam would assure us that the text attempts to theorize and systematize the already
existing practices of Tamil language on the basis of possibly Paninian and aindra traditions24.
Hence, it has been argued that the linguistic and grammatical works in Tamil were composed
after the emergence of the early Tamil songs, and marked the development of the formal and
structural aspects of language25. Here also, it has been maintained that the formulations in
Tolkappiyam have been directly adapted from Sanskrit grammatical traditions26. Arguments
to the contrary that the effort by Tolkappiyam was to systematize the indigenous Tamil
expressions rather than impose an alien structure upon Tamil, has also been made27.This
argument is ,of course, based on the assumption that the oral tradition has been anterior to
the linguistic systematization of the Tamil language.2*
The problem of the emergence of Tamil language implies the emergence and spread of
the population speaking the language. Earlier ethnographic studies discussed the possibility
of a migrant 'Dravidian' population intermixing with indigenous population, although there
is no concrete evidence for such a suggestion. Linguists have pointed to the language of the
Todas in the Nilgiris as preserving the archaic form of Tamil similar to Sangam Tamil29. A
large number of loan words from Prakrit and Pali were incorporated into this archaic Tamil,
showing that the language was being modified by migrants from different parts of India30.
Classical Tamil, as it emerged by the early medieval period, incorporated a number of
This picture of the social and political changes in early Tamil cou
citing various reasons. It has been pointed out that the Ttnais wer
by the early Tamil singers, and they referred to literary spatiality
to real geographies. The Tina' geographies were not representing
modes of production that co-existed and interacted with one ano
who sustained themselves by conducting predatory cattle raids u
warriors. Early Tamil poetry consisted of heroic songs intende
warriors involved in such raids36. The Cheras, Cholas and Pandy
conventional sense, but only chiefs who acquired more power
other chiefs and assuming control of the riverside littoral region
The process of transition from tribe to state has also been deb
early historians have focused on the 'Aryanisation' process th
migrations and the performance of Vedic sacrifices by several
rulers40. The introduction of Dharmic and Shastraic elements in the
in the Tamil country has been stressed in the recent studies also41.
to the formation of nadu in early historic period, which has bee
type of political formation42. A persuasive set of arguments have
to the impact of the Greco-Roman trade on the emerging kingdom
The Greco-Roman trade resulted in the export of spices, textiles,
pearl from Tamilakam and import of bullion, which encou
commodities and the development of major ports of trade and int
rulers of the rivers valleys who were in a position to control bot
process of trade, developed into the early states. Thus the Cheras co
and Mucin, Cholas Uraiyur and Puhar, and the Pandyas, Madu
meant that there were deliberate efforts by the ventans to extend their sway to the coastal
regions where important maritime ports were located45.
The arguments regarding the emergence of'state and kingship have also been contested.
The Chera-Chola-Pandya triad were little more than chiefdom states that depended on kinship
structures and dependent warriors, with the additional resources for their conquests coming
from surplus produce of the marutam and neytal regions46. Stray references to sacrifices in
early Tamil texts are insufficient to show that a Dharmic and shastraic concept of kingship
had consolidated. The Roman trade, believed to have facilitated the state formation, was
little more than unequal exchange between an Empire and a group of tribal chiefdoms47.
The spread of Roman coin hoards did not imply monetization of the economy and the
resulting consolidation of surplus in the hands of chiefs, which would have provided stable
financial foundations for the emergence of state. It is possible that the Roman coins were
not used as money, but as luxury articles hoarded by the members of the ruling kinship
groups or traders48.
Similar debates are occurring regarding the transition processes during and after the
early historic period. Early historians predisposed towards the dynastic concept of political
processes postulated an intervening period between the early historic "kings' and the later
emergence of Pandya and Paliava states. This period called 'Kalabhra interregnum' was
presumably from 3"1 to sixth centuries CE, when the Tamil country was believed to have
been overrun by Northern invaders , called 'kalabhras'49. The kalabhra rule particularly that
of the king referred to in the Buddhist chronicles by the name Accuta Vikkanta was regarded
as a period of Buddhist domination50. The interregnum was succeeded by the Pandya-Pallava
kingship which also saw the emergence of Brahmanas as the dominant social and ideological
force. This argument is, in effect, a continuation of thee thesis of 'Aryanisation' where the
transformation of Tamil society occurred because of the intervention of the migrants and
invaders from the north. The transformation was also the result of the growth and expansion
of the agrarian economy of Tamil country, which provided the basis for the new political
structure. The transition might have also been facilitated by the decline of Roman trade,
which contributed to the growth of the early historic political formations.
The Kalabhra argument has been revived in another form, by characterizing them as
'Kaliyarasar '. The term has been linked to the depiction of the 'kali Age' by the Brahmanas,
which was considered as a period of social crisis51. The social crisis of the early Tamil
society has been depicted as the period, in which the tribal society underwent transformation.
New social divisions between the higher and lower strata appeared and systems of exploitation
and plunder began to emerge. Kaliyarasar presumably referred to the political power
exercised by such exploiting groups. The breakdown of tribal society and the emergence of
stratified and exploitative social order, made the growth of a new state form necessary, and
this was made possible by the Brahmanic 'discourse of social differentiation and
stratification'52.
It can be seen that despite the differences in emphasis on the processes of social
stratification and state formation, a general argument emerges on the processes of social
transition in early historic Tamil society. Early historic Tamil society was a tribal society
that was undergoing changes due to three identifiable processes. The first was the conflicts
for resources and wealth, specifically cattle raids that resulted in the formation of chiefdoms;
the second was occupation of riverside agricultural tracts and the growth of overseas and
internal contacts with other parts of India and the world that contributed to the formation of
early states. The third was a period of crisis that led to 'the breakdown of the tribal society
and the emergence offa class divided society characterized by stratified agrarian order, and
the social and ideological dominance of the Brahmanas53. There are of course dissenting
views such as the denial of the role of overseas contacts and the emergence of a state form
The argument does not answer the prime question of the forma
The transition from early historic was not simply a process of tran
from tinai geographies to the territory of the Paliavas, Pandyas
the period when the territory of the Tamil speaking people wa
own social and cultural features. It is this question that we propose
parts of this presentation.
sites in the river valleys, sometimes adjacent to but distinct from hilly and tableland regions
have yielded evidence for habitation, trade goods and coins68. Although it is difficult in our
present state of information to form definite conclusions about temporal or cultural sequences,
it appears possible to postulate that sedentarism, regular production and exchange practices
developed among the megalithic people when they occupied river valleys. It is there that
regular habitations also could emerge. However, the monument production of the megalithic
people shows common features, cutting across geographical variations. They include pit
burials, use of cists, cairn circles and occasionally multiple chambers, evidence for fractional
burials in urns, distribution of grave goods that share a common, but stratified material
culture69. It is to this common cultural pattern that we find trade goods such as precious
stones, extraneous pottery and coinage added in river valley or port sites70.
Sharing a particular mi/ erial culture by the hill and the river valley people would
imply that goods that would be utilized for the making of the culture would be transported
from one geographical space to the other. Thus the clay for the making of pots, and the
potters themselves would travel from place to place, and iron for making a weapon or an
implement would move from a hill slope to a river valley. Beryl and rock crystal from the
nearby hills thus reached a trade centre at Kotumanal71 and the pepper and spices from the
mountains reached the ports in the West coast. Russetted Coated ware and its technology
moved to several parts of South India. Entire grave technologies could have also travelled,
as in the rock cut passage chamber tombs in Karnataka, which are found in North Kerala
also72. These movements show the circulation of people, technology and culture, the process
by which the occupants of different geographical places become interrelated. Thus the hills
that compose the Western and Eastern Ghats, the hill slopes and table lands that are distributed
in Northern Tamilnad, areas proximate to the Western Ghats, and Kerala, where the megaliths
are distributed form a circulation zone linked to the various river valleys in the adjacent
regions73. Population can move from the hills to the valleys and vice versa.
- Evidence for such movements is found from the early Tamil songs. Tina is of the early
Tamil songs not only depict different geographical regions or eco-zones, but also definite
relations among these regions. The akam songs among the early Tamil poetry deal with
separation of lovers, the women pining for the beloved who has gone far away, or the man
rushing home to join the beloved. Separation involves movement, which is indicated as
actual movement along the pathways (aruselmakkal)14 or across mountain passes (Curam
iraintor) 75or the imagined hazards faced by the lover in an unknown land or enemy territory
(Onnar teyam)16. Songs also refer to the movements of bards (panar) and traders (vanikar)
as well as the appearance of strangers (vanpalar) along major pathway7^. Such movements
show that definite forms and paths of movement had become established by the time of
composition of the songs. Such movements are stated to be across crossroads (kavalai) and
streets (mamku)1*. They must have crossed forests also.79 Such movements linked different
tinai geographies and settlements, including the residences of the chiefs.
Movements of the bards are significant here. The panas survived by eulogizing the
heroes and also presumably acted as collectors and disseminators of information that saw
or heard on the way. The information they gathered could be mythical and real, referring to
both the present and the past in the time frame of the bard, as well as proximate and distant
in the spatial configuration. The bards moved only in the real space of the kudis, tinais and
the abodes of their heroes, but their narratives incorporated allusions to lands tljey probably
never saw such as Imayam (Himalayas) and patali (pataliputra)80. In a society of multiple
economies and geographies, the movements of the panas were facilitated by the language of
communication. A linguistic community was formed, which distinguished itself from- the
other linguistic territories or Molipeyar teyam or colpeyar teyam .SI Linguistic community
thus transcended the tribal segments of kinship (kilai' habitat (kut i), settlement (Ur) and
Writing also implies that the linguistic community has become complex enough to
accommodate concepts and practices that require distinction and individuation. This is done
in two ways. First, the society becomes complex enough to develop new labor practices and
technologies, cultural practices, ideas and concepts. Second is the growth of a flexible
linguistic form that accommodates new words and symbols that could render these practices,
concepts and ideas within the linguistic framework. The first is demonstrated by the expansion
of internal and overseas trade, circulation of commodities and expansion of agriculture that
facilitated river valley settlements. The latter is demonstrated by the incorporation of a
large number of words from Prakrit, Pali, Sanskrit, and even from foreign languages into
Tamil. The emergence of Vattezhuttu, attributed to 4,h-6,h centuries AD show that writing
had become exclusively based on the Tamil oral form. Such changes also indicate that
Tamil region was evolving into a political territory.
The bardic heroes did not represent sustained political authority over a region. The
is no reference to a territory controlled by a Vel , except the hill residence and the kin gro
and kudimakkal who were involved in the redistributive process. Many Vels did not lea
heirs who took over the control of their residence, with the possible exception of Potiyilma
The conflicts over wealth and resources increased as the concepts of wealth underwe
change. This was the result of growing access to resources and their circulation that facilitat
the development of agriculture and trade. 100 Emergence of not only the three ventan
chera, chola and Pandya, but also other plain chiefs (Mannans) like Atiyamans, a
Ilantiraiyan of Thondai, as well as the coastal chief Nannan of ezhilmalai will have to
traced to such processes.
Growth of the Urs has several features. Urs in the early Tamil texts appear a
agglomerations of habitat ( kudi ), located proximate to the production or livelihood spac
They also appear as centers to which goods are transported across pathways (aru) an
acquired or gathered ( pandam)m . Urs also contain public spaces (potiyil, Manram, Kalam
The incidence of resource mobilization by the chiefs indicated the changes taking
place in the society and economy of the region. The tinai geographies had facilitated the
exchange among resource regions in various exchange centers. Once exchange centers and
settlements came under the protection of the chiefs, negotiations and conflict among the
chiefs resulted not only in further conquests by the chiefs but also in further interactions
among settlements and resource regions. This is indicated in two ways in the texts. One is
the reference to chiefs as 4 sovereigns' (porunan)1 22 of more than one centre, such as the
chera being the porunan of karur and tondi, the pandyan controlling kutal(Madurai) and
korkai, Chola controlling urantai (uraiyur) and Puhar1". Both the places controlled by the
respective chiefs were exchange centers, but the passage from one to the other would also
be controlled by the chief. This is seen in the case of cheras, when the centers of kotumanam
(kotumanal) and panthar (not identified) are mentioned together124. Cheras are mentioned
as controlling the resources of the sea (katalam) and the mountains (rock s-kallam)115, and
also were overlords of konkav and puzhiyar. m Over lordship over knocker ensured the
supply of precious stones (konkar mani)127 and puzhiyar that of forest produce. Cholas are
controlling the resources around Kaveri River, and the Pandyas controlled resources of
Vaigai and the corals and sands near korkai. This means that the patterns of conquest indicated
in the puram songs and narrated more exclusively for Cheras in Patirrupattu, ensured control
of the chiefs over resource regions and labor processes, transcending the tinai geographies.
Such control facilitated traffic and exchange of goods. They were not restricted to
exchange of tinai goods but also resources from mountains, table lands and seas, including
precious stones, metals, clothes, corals, beads and spices. The movement of such goods is
indicated by traders specializing such goods or vanikar128. Salt was presumably the first
such commodity transported by Umanar and their practice, Umanachattu , facilitated similar
trading activity iiļ other commodities also129. Goods were transported using wheeled carts
(cakatu)1™, which transformed the pathways into regular routes. Vanikar were not restricted
to the tinai geographies but came from other parts also and spoke different languages131.
This clearly indicated movement of people and traffic in goods from other parts of India,
and also overseas.
The impact of the mercantile activity on the Tamil region is a matter that requires
careful examination. Exchange within the tinai geographies were in essential commodities,
including rice, fish, meat, salt, milk ghee and honey, grass mats, herbs, pots, toddy, wood
and metal goods. The goods exchanged by vanikar included clothes, gold, rice and grains,
ornaments and precious stones. Tinai exchange did not involve coins. Some of the goods
exchanged by vanikar such as stones (mani), beads ( muthu ), pepper (kari), sandal (chanthu,
aaram) and other spices were produced, or rather gathered from the Tamil country itself41.
However, gold and metals (pon), clothes ( kacchai , kalinkam142) and precious stones were
not only indigenous products, but came from different parts of India and were not part of the
local exchange processes. They were part of the exotica exchanged in festivities or among
the kin groups of the chiefs143. The medium of exchange was punch-marked coins from the
north and some of the chiefs like the Cheras and pandyas produced lead coins much in a
similar vein144. Roman coins were hoarded, but there is little concrete evidence that they
were internally circulated in the early historic period.. There is little to show that Roman
trade had a significant impact on the livelihood and labor processes of the population of the
Tamil country. For example, although Cheran Chenkuttuvan is supposed to have engaged
the yavanas in the sea and probably occupied Muciri, there is little evidence that Muciri
remained in the hands of the Cheras145. The gold brought by the Romans went to the cargo-
suppliers and the chiefs146. It is possible that the Roman ports rem
by migrant merchants and craftsmen, who had little contact with th
except by trade147. It was only with the decline of the Roman trade
migrants began14*. Similarly, evidence for local chiefs occupying o
ports is also very little. Romans might have traded with the local
evidence also of local traders navigating the oceans. All this, along w
the northern merchants and vanikar points to the growth of an
developed from the multiple livelihood processes including hunti
produce, fishing and collection of rare items from the sea, collect
stones, and also preliminary craft and artisan production. Such a
transcend the tribal segmentation, but did not eliminate the tinai ge
the tinais were integrated in an exchange framework regulated by t
of the chiefs, and the settlements and resource regions involved in t
became the political territory of the chief. Some of the Vels did
position came to be acquired by the chiefs who had the better sh
overseas exchange processes, the Cheras, Cholas and Pandyas, w
ventans. In order to retain their control over the exchange econom
acquire and retain control over the various regions, earlier determ
They along with the vels formed a new group of political territori
Tamil region.
resources or surplus produce1 v' Thus integration of the region was achieved through 'the
political supremacy, of any of the ventans, much in the pattern of a digvijaya137.
This reorganization of the linguistic region of the Tamils is taking place during the
time when the political territories consolidate. The consolidation is taking place with the
emergence of the Nadus as the Tamil region. Even the linguistic territory is conceived in
terms of nadus. The term nadu already appears in the early Tamil songs as several chiefs,
particularly in the Kurinci tinai are referred to as nadan169. The term appears more frequently
in the later songs, and by the early medieval period, the entire Tamil region was conceived
in terms of Nadus. Nadus were conceived of as provinces and even as identical with
janapadas, but there is now a consensus that nadus referred to clusters of agrarian
settlements170. Spread of agriculture in the river valleys was already indicated in the marutam
songs. Tolkappiyam still referred to nilam to denote spaces. But by the time the commentaries
of Tolkappiyam were composed nadus had become the central territorial entity of the Tamil
country and nilam referred to in Tolkappiyam was rendered in terms of nadu by the
commentators. This shows that the landscape of Tamil country was transforming during the
middle of first millennium C E. when Tolkappiyam took its present shape, and nadus or
Such claims showed not only the impact of the migrants, but a
chiefs to maintain their political territories. In a situation when the p
divided and several chiefs fought one another, it was clear that th
conqueror (ventan) and overlord of conquered people (ko or kom
sustain the territory. It was necessary to develop a system of politica
in the purattinai, kanci. The devices for enforcing authority would
advice, sanctions and moral restrictions180. These injunctions form
(aram) that ensured political authority and warded off the destabili
(maram). This process is visible in the case of the Chera chie
Patirrupattu. The earlier chiefs addressed in the text were eulogize
the later rulers, from Celvakatunko were addressed as overlords of
responsible for the maintenance of the aram. 181
Aram , along with porul (wealth) and inpam (desire) formed the
from the four purusharthas of the North Indians, with one importan
deliverance ( moksa , veedu, turuviyal). Thus the purusharthas were
of a moral economy, not only for the different political territorie
entire Tamil linguistic region. This intent is clear in the foremo
emerge from Tamil country during the middle of first millennium CE, Mappal (Kurai) by
Val lu var IX2. The text obviously attempted to create a moral order for the entire Tamil society
to which all sections of society from chiefs to laboring classes were bound. It also recognized
the emerging social stratification183. Similar prescriptions for a moral order emerged in later
texts like naiadi nanuru , and those works included in the category of kilkanakku1X4.
Prescriptions for a moral economy, now based more clearly on lana and Buddhist philosophy,
appeared in the longer texts modeled on Sanskrit kavyas, like Chilappatikaram , Manimekalai,
Jivakachintamani and Neelikesi. Such social and moral prescriptions were discussed also
in texts like Porulatikaram of Tolkappiyam, where the interpretation of meaning in language
was related to the material and moral features of the society that spoke the language. Linguistic
expressions were explicitly related to the spatial, temporal, and material factors that formed
the setting for the speech acts1*5. Again, it has been argued that the linguistic prescriptions
in Tolkappiyam have been strongly influenced by Jaina thought1*6.
Scholars have pointed to the powerful Brahmanic and Sramanic influence in structuring
of South Indian society and culture, and they have used concepts like 'Aryanisation' 'Great
and little traditions', and 'secondary state formation1*7'. As indicated above, the Brahmanic
and Sramanic influences in Tamil culture after the Ashokan invasions cannot be rejected,
but it is possible that the scholars may have overstressed the impact, particularly of the
Brahmanas in the early historic period. The influence of the migrant Brahmanas and the
Sramanic monks and sravakas cannot be ignored, but there role will have to be set in the
background of the changes taking place in the Tamil society. Growth of the exchange
ccofcomy. outlined earlier, and the spread of wetland paddy agriculture, as indicated by the
reference to the nadus showed that the tinai geographies were transforming, and Urs were
being located in the specific productive landscapes (pulam '^.Redistribution processes were
also transforming, with the resources and surplus produce being gathered, utilized and
exchanged in the major political centers of the chiefs, such as karur, Uraiyur and Madurai.
This gave rise to the distinction between Uyarntor or Me lor and the laboring (linai gnar,
Vinaivalar) and downtrodden ( Tiyavan , kadaisiyan) groups1*9. As the political territory of
the Ven tans expanded, the congregation of resources and goods into major centers also
increased, thus creating a non-laboring group of the kin group of ventans, and their
dependents, warriors and scholars that subsisted on the resources ( pe rumak kal , perunkuti).m
Major merchants, singers and dancers were also part of this upper class. It is these groups,
who subsisted on the basis of the growing agriculture and trade that were influenced by the
culture and ideas of the northern migrants. It is also important that the existing traditions of
the linguistic community and political territory in turn influenced the theory and practice of
the migrants. This can be illustrated in the way in which a typical Jain text like
chilappatikaram is influenced by the moral economy developing in the period that a king
who is not just must be destroyed. Similarly the moral universe of the Tamils depicted in
Muppal, is based on the Tamil cultural practice already developed in early Tamil texts, and
not a code imposed from above in the typical pattern of the Dharm ashastra 191 . More important
is the way by which the Sramanic traditions, including Buddhism, Jainism, and that of
Ajivikas were rendered into Tamil, and made part of the linguistic and material culture of
the Tamils192.
It is the moral economy envisioned by scholars and poets influenced by the Sramanic
tradition that provided the foundation of the political authority emerging in the river
valleys.Cilappatikaram, with Jaina sympathies was probably authored by a junior Chera
chief and Buddhism was patronized by the Cholas.mNaladi nanuru, a Jaina text belonging
to the kilkannkku collection, was probably composed under Muttarayar, the chiefs of Kaveri
basin194. Early Tontai (Paliava) rulers ''*also patronised Buddhism and were probably
responsible for the Buddhist monuments at Kanci. Sramana influence over the Paliavas
continued up to the period of Mahendra varman, when the Sramana orders declined under
This shows that the image of the chief as conqueror and destro
political territories was being complemented by the image of th
emerging moral economy. The combination of these two funct
growth of functionaries who executed these functions as the wi
rise to the early state in the Tamil society. However, the rise of
protector did not result in the integration of the linguistic and c
problem was compounded possibly by political interventions from t
kingdoms of Deccan.200 This was achieved when Tamil country b
divine landscape, and a deity who was conceived as the protect
inhabited by the Tamils. A noted earlier, the attempt to demarca
from the lands where vulgar Tamil was spoken was already takin
was to identify the linguistic core area as a divine landscape inh
under the protection of their deity. It is also possible that the entire
was a narrative developed as a ruse to establish the credibility of
tamilnilax and the Pandya patronage of the Tamil cankam wo
patronage of Tamil as such201.
and economies of the early historic Tamil region get replaced by the eastern coastal plain
that forms the landscape of Tirumurukarrupatai. The coastal plain is bordered by the highlands
of the Western and Eastern Ghats and the Bay of Bengal. Thus the riversides littoral becomes
the central s geographical space of the new landscape, and paddy agriculture becomes the
central livelihood form and the vellala landholders emerge as the major landowning class to
which Brahmanas who received land grants from the emerging chiefs come to be added.
Other livelihood patterns that were part of the earlier Tinai geographies became peripheral,
and it became imperative on the rulers of the river valleys conduct raids on the bordering
regions mobilize additional resources. The political authority of such region should have
both the means of controlling and regulating agricultural production. Chiefs do not simply
collect tirai and control resources and people, but control land as the resource and means of
production as well as the people who are the producers207. The role of the protector becomes
the role of the sovereign (Ko and koman )208. Sovereignty becomes legitimized through
invoking the divine as the almighty, who becomes the protector of the sovereignty as well as
the land*w. Thus the political territory of the Paliava and Pandya chiefs became the hegemonic
landscapes of the emerging state, legitimized by the divine. The hegemonic landscape also
ensured the legitimation of the emerging division between the non-producing and producing
-distributing classes and facilitated the introduction of 'Puranic religion" and Brahmanic
ideology as powerful stabilizing forces.210 It also incorporated the classical Tamil language
and literature in its organized, pure form and developed it as part of the emerging court
culture .The dominance of Tamil language oral and written and inscribed forms ensured
that the emerging landscape will be a Tamil landscape. The original linguistic community
built upon the confluence of spatial and temporal dimensions, material culture and linguistic
expressions was replaced by the embeddedness of the 'perfect' Tamil language on the
hegemonic landscape of the divine and the profane. Such a landscape also removed all the
kotuntamil forms and regions where such forms continued to exist, including the people of
the Western Ghats and the West Coast. However, these regions were subject to raids and
conquest by the sovereigns of the East, Pandyas, Paliavas and later the Cholas. Cheras, who
were originally part of the linguistic and political territory, were also excluded from the
landscape and developed in a different direction forming a landscape of their own. Others
continued a peripheral, marginal existence, destined to be absorbed as the labour force in
the hegemonic landscape or retaining their tribal characteristics, being called ' Adivasis' in
later literature.
The argument so far developed can be summed up as follows. During the first
millennium BCE, the people who built the Iron Age megalithic burials in different parts of
South India were also interacting among themselves through processes of booty capture,
warfare over resources and products, exchange and cultural communication. In the region
referred to as tamilakam (which is here referred to as the Tamil country), multiple economies
and livelihood patterns existed, this came to be expressed as the tinai geographies. The
processes of cultural interaction resulted in a common linguistic form that came to be called
Tamil. The linguistic form itself may have had similarities with some other languages in
India and elsewhere now referred to as Dravidian languages. The embedded character of the
linguistic form on the Tinai geographies and the development of a corresponding linguistic
expressions, codified in texts like Tolkappiyam provided it with a cultural distinctiveness
not shared by others who spoke a similar language, and thus a Tamil linguistic community
was born. Warfare, internal and external migrations and expansion and diversification of
forms of production and exchange resulted in the growth of an exchange economy in which
people following different livelihood patterns participated, and which also facilitated further
migrations as well as internal and external trade. Chiefs who developed through booty capture
and warfare began to carve out political territories within the linguistic region, and some
were also involved in interaction and warfare with chiefs in the non-Tamil region also.
1 . Thomas Trautmann, Languages and nations: The Providian proof n Colonial Madras , Delhi, Yoda
2006; Idem, The Clash of Chronologies: Ancient India and the modern world , Yoda Press, 2009, Chap
5to7.
2. For a general overview of the recent researches, see Rajan Gurukkal, 'The beginnings of the His
Period; The Tamil South( up to the end of the fifth century AD), Romila Thapar(Ed), Recent Perspec
in Early Indian History, London, Sangam Books, 1995.
3. Akananunx (Hereafter AN) 227; Purananuru (HereafterPN) 19, 35,168.
4. Panamparanar, one of the disciples of Tolkappiyar, has characterised the Tamil country as ' the prosp
world between venkatam in the north and kumari in the south where Tartiil language is spoken' ( Vatavenk
tenkumari ayitai tamilkurunallulakam ), quoted in Ra.Raghava Iyengar, Tamil Varalanx, Annam
University, 1979 p.26
5. For example, Thirteenth rock edict refers to 'keralaputo satiyaputa' and (Chodapamda tambapan
keralaputras (cheras), satyaputras (atiyamans), cholas, Pandyas and Tainrapanriyas, who could be pe
of Ceylon) but there no reference to Dramila, although Andhra is mentioned. E.Hultszch (ed), 'Inscrip
of Asoka, Corpus Inscriptorum Indicarumyoll, Archaeological Survey Of India, 199 preprint.
6. V.Kanakasabhai Pillai, Tamils eighteen hundred years ago , Madras,! 906, pp.24-5;37-8
7. Me Crindle J.W, Commerce and navigation of the Erythrean sea and Ancient India as describe
Ktesias, the À77/í//an, Amsterdam, 1 973.
8. McCrindle J.W.. Ancient India as described by Ptolemy , London, 1927, facsimile reprint, Kolkata. P.
The term is found in Periplus of thee Erythrean sea also.
9. McCrindle, Commerce and Navigation , p. 1 32.They were called kerobothas by Ptolemy and Caelobot
by Pliny.
10. Siripunijja padasiso davidasanghassa kargovuttho namena vaļjanandi patudavodi mahasaiho pancasae
chavisa vikkamarayissa maranaputihassa'dakhina mahurajado davidasangho mahamoho, Kainil Zvelebil,
The Smile of M u rugan, Hague, 1973, p.48 footnote 2.
1 1 . There is an interesting debate on the genesis of the word 'Tamil' in which scholars have tried to derive the
word from Sanskrit, the term referring to sweetness, mystical properties of thee word ctc. See for a
discussion, K.N.Sivaraja Pillai, 'Derivation of the word Tamil' (1936, reprinted in Tamil A'vu, Perasiriyar
ke. En.SivarajaPillai Nurrantu Ninaivu Malar , University Of Madras, 1 979, pp.25-34.
36. K.Kailasapathy, Tamil Heroic Poetry, Oxford, The Clarendon Press, 1968
37. Rajan Gumkkal, Forms of Production and forces of Change in Early Tamil Society^/uJ/e.v in History n.s
vo IV No.2 July-Deceinber,1989 pp. 159-76. Gurukkal has later called the early tamil polities as 'chiefdom
states'.
38. Seneviratnc S, 'Pre-State Societies and State Socieities: Transformations in the Political Ecology of South
India with Special reference to Tamil Nadu, Seminar on State in Pre-Colonial South India, Jawaharlal
Neliru University, new delhi, 1 989
39. Seneviratne S, From Kudi to Nadu: A suggested framework for the study of p
in Early Iron Age South India' L.K.Srinivasan and S.Nagaraju(ed), Sri Naga
rao Festschrift , Dr.M.S.Nagaraja rao Felicitation Committee, Bangalore, 1 995
40. For example, K.A.Nilakantha Shastri, Development of Religion in South I
pp. 12-5.
41 . M.GS. Narayanan, Vedic -Puranic-Shastraic Elements in Tamil Sangam Culture' in Foundations of South
Indian society and Culture, New Delhi, 1992 pp. 132-47.
42, Seneviratne, from Kudi to nadu Op.cit
43 . Clarence Maloney, The beginnings of Civilisation in South India' Journal of Asian Studies , xxix, No.3, 603-
16,1970;Richard S Kennedy, The King in Early South India: As chieftain and Emperor' Indian Historical
review, Volili, No,. 1, July, 1976.
44. See for a discussion, R.Champakalakshmi, Trade, Ideology and Urbanisation: South India 300BC to AD
1300 , Oxford University Press, 1996, Chapters 2and 3.
45. This is shown by the activities of the Chera chiefs nedunceralatan and Cen Kuttuvan in the western seas
, fighting against the yavanas( Patirrupattu, second aand fifth pattu).
46. Rajan Gurukkal 0/?.07; Gurukkal refers to the 'blending zones' between tinai that facilitated production
and exchange, that played a significant role in the growth of surplus appropriation and redistribution
processes that sustained the chiefdom states of the ventans.
47. The point has been strongly raised in Rajan Gurukkal, 'Classical Indo-Roman Trade: A Misnomer in
Poltical economy' Economic and Political Weekly,V ol.XLVIII Nos,26&27, June29-July6 2013,pp.67-78.
48. S.Suresh has argued against the claim that the roman coins were used as ornaments, by pointing out the
very few perforated Roman coins have been discovered. S. Suresh, Symbols of Trade: Roman and Psedo-
Roman Objects in South India, Delhi, 2004.
49. The term 'Kalabhra Interrugnum' has been coined by K.A.Niilakantha Shastri, and has almost gained
canonical status in Tamil Historiography. Detailed studies on the period itself, have been very few. One
example is M.Arunachalam,for/o/>Arav in the pandya Country and threir Impact on the Life and
Letters, Madras Uniiversity,1979.
50. Buddhadatta, who wrote a commentary on Vinayapitaka , termed Vinayaviniccaya, states that he wrote
when Accuta Vikkanta was ruling over the Cola Kingdom.
51. The argument regarding kali age as a period of social crisis was raised by B.N.S.Yadava in his article ,
'The Account of the Kali Age and Social Transition from the Antiquity to Middle Ages', Indian Historical
review. Vols 1 and 2, 1978-9. The argument was incorporated into his own thesis on Indian feudalism by
R.S.Sharma:,'The Kali Age: A Period of Social crisis' in B.N.Mukherjee(ed), History and Thought:
Essays in honour of A. LBasham , Calcutta, 1982. The argument has been sought to be used in the case of
Tamil country also on the basis of the reference to kaliyarasar in Velvikkudi grant.(K.K.Pillay, A Sociaal
History of the tamils Vol.1, University of Madras, 1975, p.509)
52. Rajan Gurukkal, 'Towards a New Disocurse: Discursive processes in Early South India', Social formations
of early South India' Oxford University Press, 20 1 0,pp. 1 82-20 1 .
53. Another version of the transition is provided by Rajan Gurukkal, 'Social formation from ancient to medieval'
, in Gurukkal, Social formations ,,pp205-23
54. It is not intended to suggest chronology of the early Tamil texts, as the composition of the texts and the
compilaron of thee texts along with commentaries could be in different periods. For a discussion of the
periodisation of early Tamil texts K.Si vathamby, Tamizhil Ilaakkiya Varalaru, Chenna, 20 1 0 pp 1 32- 1 40;2 1 0-
40.
55. Shanti Pappu, 'Reinvestigation of the pre-historic Archaeological Record in the Kortallayar
Basin, Tamil nadu', Man and Ziwv//wwie/i/,21:pp. 1-23, 1996; B. Narasimhaiah, Neolithic and megalithic
Cultures in iimiłnadu, Delhi, 1980; K. Rajan, The Archaeological Gazetteer ofTamilnadu, Tanjavur, 1 997.
56. A number of w orks on megalithic culture in south India is available. B.K.Guniraja rao, Megalithic Culrure
in South India, Prasaranga, University of Mysore, 1972; L.S.Leshnik, South Indian Megalithic Burials :
The Pandukal Complex, Wiesbaden, 1974; A.Sundara , early passage Chamber tombs in South India,
dellii,1975; B.Narasimhaiaih, 0/?.O7;U.S.Moorti, Megalithic Cultures in South India: Socio-economic
Perspectives, Varanasi,1994; See for the details of megaliths in Tamil region( except Kerala) K. Rajan ,
V.P.Yathees Kumar and S.selvakumar, Catalogue of Archaeological remains in Tamilnadu, 2 vols,
tanjavur,2009.
57. Mesolithic artifacts, including microliths were found in the exacavation of megalithic burials recently
conducted(2008) in Anakkarai, Bharatappuzha basin, Kerala state by Rajan Gurukkal and his team..
58. Hie significance of technological variability and labour process is emphasized by R.Brubaker', Aspects of
mortuary variability in the South Indian iron Age' Bulletin of the Tteccan College Post-Graduate and
research studies, 60-6 1,2001, pp. 253-302; See also Andrew M Bauer, 'Towards a Political Ecology of
Early South India: Preliminary Considerations of the Socio-politics of Land and Animal Use in the Southern
Deccan, Neolithic through early Historic periods, Asian Perspectives, Vol.46, No. 1 .Spring 2007 pp.3-35
59. An interesting possibility has been suggested by K.Sivathamby, when he pointed out that Mullai Tinai in
Sangma texts indicated the space of transition from pastoralism to agriculture, and also a transition from
6 1 . The sites excavated include Roman trade centres, Arikainedu( M.Wheeler, A.Ghosh and Krishna deva, 1
Vimal Begley( 1 989-92,Report, 1 996),Alagankulam(R. Nagasamy and Abdul Majeed, 1 970), and the ongoin
excavation of Pattanam(2007-13).0thers are Korkai( R. Nagasamy, 1970), Karur (Nagasamy, 1974)
Kaveripattanam(K.V.soundararajan, 1 963-73, Report, 1 994) Uraiyur (Indian archaeological Repoits, 1964-
5; 1965-6).
62. H.N.Singh, History and Archaeology of Black and red Pottery(chalcolithic People), Delhi, 1982.
63. K.Rajan, Startigraphical Position of Russetted Coated Painted Ware' in C.Margabandhu et. al (edj Indian
Archaeological Heritage: K.V.Soundararajan Festschrift , Delhi, 1991.
64. AĚ Sundara, Op.Cit. Passage chambers have been found in the northern part of Kerala also. K.J .John,
Rock Cut cave tombs at Chitrari: Some new light on the rock cut cave tombs of malabar', Journal of
Kerala Studies, 1(4), 1974, pp.383-387.
65. Argument has been advanced for the diffusion of megalithic culture from beyond the Hindu kush, Thus
contacts with West Asia. Also, rock cut passage-passage porthole chambers that cover most of the laterite
beds of Kerala were 'local adaptations of th models reached by the sea probably from Ethiopia that has
parallels for the types'( Rajan Gurukkal and Raghava Varier, Cultural History of Kerala,
Thiruvananthapuram,1999 p. 124.
66. Leshnik Op.Cit , has argued that the authors of the megaliths were nomadic pastoralists.However, the
forms of labour and technology required for building the megaliths would suggest a semi-sedentary
population, but without the concept of a territory. Increase in population and diversification of labour
processes, for example, potmaking, iron tools and mat could also facilitate and search for resources and
settlement adjacent to resource he regions. Leshnik himself approvingly uses the identification by fergusson
and Walhouse that the megaliths were created by Kurumbas( Leshnik, p.l44,93).However, the
ethnoarchaeology of the movement and settlement of kurumbas( or kurumas) have not been worked out.
67. R.Champakalakshmi, 'Archaeology and Literary Tradition' Puratattva, Vol. Viii, 1975, pp.1 10-122.
68. Excavations at Karur is an example. R.Nagasamy, 'Karuvur-Vanji, Capital of the sangam Ceras', Jourrnal
of Kerala studies, Vol.1, Part iv, December, 1 974, pp.395-402.
69. Gururaja rao Op Cit, Leshnik Op.Cit. Moorti, Op.Cit. Stratification appears in the construction of the
burials , from pit to multiple chamber burials, and the distribution of grave goods within the burial type.
Geographical variation appears in the resources used in the production of grave goods or structures, as in
the case of the use of laterite in Kerala or the choice of clay for potmaking.
70. Incidence of beiyl, carnelian, and other beads, gold, Roman amphora and roulette ware in the presence of
coins in the Pattanam site along with standard megalithic grave goods in pattanam site is an example.
71. K.Rajan, Iron and gem stone industries, Op.Cit.
72. Rajan Gurukkal and Raghava Varier(Gen.Ed) Cultural History of Kerala, Vol.1, Trivandrum,1999 p.l 19
73. Maps prepared by the Historical Atlas of South India project, French Institute , Pondichery, show the
predominance of distribution of megalithic burials along the Western Ghtas and te hillsolps and table lands
surrounding them. However during the period from 300-600 AD and 600-1300 AD the habitation sites
shift to the river valleys. The maps can be accessed at hatlas@ifpindia.orp.
74. AN 11 9, 121 (Aruselmakkal Chorupothi venkutai : wayfarers carrying packed rice and umbrella),
AN 1 75,343(^4 ruselvanpaiax- Stangers on the road), AN2Al(Arupalaneenth'~mo''ng though several roads)
75. AN 7,35, 103,1 19, 129, 169,3 13etc ref.to Curam iraintor or Malai iraintor
76. AN338
77. AN95, 1 07, 1 1 3, 1 75, 1 9 1 ,277,289,343;PN 78,79 etc.The frequency of these references show
movement along cong the pathways, where known and unknown people travelled, demonstrat
movement of people and goods during the period of composition of the songs.
78. AN 35( Arunkavalaiya pulavu naru arunatram)AN 1 47f kavalai neri patu neelampa neellitai). Also
streets are connected to different passes, AN 361(vew eru mauku viyancuram iranthanan).
79. AN245 ( kal netunkavalai kanam neenthi)
80. AN 1 2 1 , 1 75,399 PN 35,39 (imayam), AN 265(patali)
81 . AN349 states that in order to reach the area of nannan , one has go through ways where peop
other languages inhabit( Colpeyar teyattu curam /ra/7//wr)People like kosarfOmw mozhi kosar)
from another linguistic region(c olpeyar teyam) and vatukar (kalla neenmozhi kathanay vatuk
speaking other languages. Vatukar were speaking a crude language(Aa/;fa neenmozhi)
82. This is seen in the use of turais( called by Kailasapathy as 'themes' but look more like poetic entr
inearly tamil poems, where this form of interplay between real and literary spatialities ta
K. Kailasapathy, Tamil Heroic Poetry, w 191-228
83. For a discussion, Rajan Gurukkal,' Writing , literacy and Social formation
formations ,pp. 1 66- 181.
84. The chronology adopted by Iravatham mahadevan in his study of the tainil Br
here. 1. Mahadevan, Early Tamil Epigraphy: From the earliest times to ó'* cent
and the Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University,2003 Ta
85. AN 107,375,378
86. AN 69 PN 175
87. There are several songs which show clear Jaina influence , for example PN 1 82( sung by Ilamperovaluti), 1 92(
sung by kaniyan Poonkunran). AN 181 refers to Juan Murai mutunul 'the concealed old knowledge' of
the Brahman as.
88. The indigenization has been attempted to be interpreted on the basis of archaeological evidence by K. Rajan,
Situating the early Historical Times in Tamilanadu: Some issues and reflections'. Social Scientist Vol.36,
1-2, 2008.
89. This is shown in the distinction between Akappeyar and purappeyar prescribed in Tolkappiyam
Porulatikaram. Thus the sutra in Akattinaiiya'$l forbids the names beyond the general names in A kam
songs and also Sutra 58 also states that proper nouns of purattinai should not be used in akattinai. Thus
the transition from common to proper nouns would signify the transition from a narrative to recording an
event, be it space, time, resources, or fonns of human practice. See for a discussion, K.N.Ganesh, Space-
time, event and expression in early Tamil texts: Historicising Tolkappiyam, Indian Historical review ,
38(1), 2011 pp. 1-22
90. Y.Subbarayalu, Visaki and Kuviran: Historical implications of names in Tamil-Brahmi Inscriptions'
K.Indrapala(ed), Early Historic tamilnadn , Chennai,2009,pp 95-122. Subbarayalu points to the existence
of Prakrit speakers, some of them from Srilanka, among those who inscribed tha names on potery or in
caves. The names in sangam literature shows more standardization , which may be the result of more
scholarly attempts those who compiled the anthologies. However, it may also show the process of
indigenization of the Prakrit speaking people.
91 . It has been argued that the system of inscribing involved the non-traditional rights and privileges in thee
society for validation( Rajan Gurukkal, Writing, Literacy and Social formations, Op.Cit). The use of the
Brahmi script is related also related to the state formation during the early Historic period ( K. Rajan,
Damili Graditi and Cave rcords: The Brahmi Script in Tamilnadu' K.Indrapala, 0/?.c/7,pp.57-94. Limitation
of writing to names and deeds appear to be an effort to preserve traditions of individual acts of benediction
or valour, different from group practice. This process of indivuation might have been creation of migrants,
including prakrit speakers, and indicated the breakup of tribal identity.
92. K.Sivathamby has argued that such a process might have place in the Tamil country indicating the process
of social formation during the periods in which the Sangam songs were composed and the period in which
the songs were compiled. K.Sivathamby, Thamizhil Ilakkiya Varalaru, Third Edition, Chennai, 20 10 pp.5 1 -
57.
1 36. Apart from the reference to the sacrifices indicated earlier, there is reference to 'rappirappalat (twice
born) and muihee( three sacrificial fires) PN, 367. PN224 refers to the Vedic sacrifice and the fire emanating
from the yupa, again demonstrating the dominant function of the Brahmana..PN 166 refers to Punjattur
Parppan kauniyan Vinnan Tayan,. Avur Mulankilar, the poet, also mentions Vedic sacrifices.
137. Mahadevan Op.Cit , 3.2,6.4 refer to Vel arai nikamam; Also PP II.6;III. 10; VIII. 5.
148. The references by Kosmas Indikopleustus on the Christian settlements in the West Coast appear after the
decline(535AD).There were also Christian migrations from West Asia, led by Thomas of Cana, and by
Mar Sapor and Mar Prot. Evidence for jews and Arabs also appear after 4"' century. Rajan Gurukkal and
Ragliava Varier, Cultural History of Kerala, pp268-9
149.. According to the colophon, Sirupanarrupatai(hereafter SAP) has been sung by Idakkazhinattu Nallur
Nathathanar and addressed to the chief Nalliyakkotan of Oymanatu, who held the nakaram of Mavilankai.
It is part of the ten songs (pattupattu) believed to have been composed later than the bardic songs of
ettutokai.
150. SAP li. 78-82
151 . SAP62-66.Ccliyan is also called korka i koman showing the control over the coastal port.
152. SAP47
1 53. SAP 48-50. The bow is the symbol of the Cheras. Vanci is also refened to in association with the n
1 54. The seven chiefs are Pekan( Avivar peruinakan perunkal natan Pekan), Pari (parampil koman), kari (
Malaiyainan tirumudikari in other texts), Ay, Atikan (probably atikaman), Nalli (naiimalai natan) and
The list appears to be an assortment of chiefs, probably a matter of literary convention rather than signif
an actual chronological consonance. However, the convention helps us to understand the extent of
Tamil political territory. Katai ezhuvallal appears in the colophon.
1 55. AN56 describes Nedunceliyan as defeating cerai, cempiyan(Cholan), Titiyan, Elini, Erumeyuran,Irunk
and Porunan. However, the purpose of the battle is not clear, nor the way in which the chief fought so m
enemies (including Erumeyuran and Irunkovel coming from a distance, probably Karnataka region) in
battlefield. .Similarly PN 66 refers to the defeat of the other ventans and the vatakkirikkal of on
them(Chera?). Again the context is not clear, even from literary conventions.
156. PN 24,76. Ritualisation of warfare is shown by the convention of the chief having to defeat s
enemies, which was supposed to have been done by netunjeliyan,Imayavarainban netuncheralat
Narmudicheral, Cenkuttuvan and Atiyaman Anci(Kailasapathy, Op.Cit, p.226). Not to be outdo
Karikalvalavan defeated eleven at Venni(Narrated in Porunararnipatai)
1 57. The heroic exploits of Tinunavalavan( identified with karikalvalavan), the chola king, as sung in Pattinapp
bu Uruttiran kannanar, has the character of a digvijaya.
158. The poet also belonged to another nadu, Idakkazhinadu, showing that nadu terminology had come i
parlance.
' 59. Tamizhnilai perra tankam marapin Makizhnanai marukin maturai (SAP66-7)
160. Iraiyanar Akapfwrul, wi'U commentary by Chenturai Mutthu, Chennai, 1 970
161. Chentamilnilatlu vazhakkotu civanithamporul vazhamai isaikkum cholle, Tolkappiyam, collatikaram,
398.
162. Naccinarkiniyar's commentary to Collatikaram, 398.
163. Tolkappiyam, Collatikaram, 400.
1 64. Naccinarkiuniyar mentions twelve natus: Ponkamatu, Olinatu,tenpantinatu, kuttanatu, kutanatu, Panrinatu,
karkanatu, ceetanatu, puzhinatu, inalatanatu, aruvanatu, aaivavatathalainatu. 12 natus surrounding them
are added to the list, They are Cinkalain(srilanka),Palaintivu, kollam, koopain, konkanam, tulu,
kutakam,karunatain, kutain, vatuku, telungu, kalinkam. Cenavarayar Changes the list somewhat by including
venatu and punnatu instead of Ponkamatu and olinatu.
i 65. The vulgar forms are already indicated in the above sutra as tisaicol, and examples are provided by the
commentators, conesponding to what came to be known as kotuntamil usages.