Title :

From Symptoms to Diagnosis: AI-Assisted Health Diagnosis Application

Project Summary:
Overview:
Our project aims to develop an innovative AI-assisted health diagnosis application that utilizes symptom analysis for
comprehensive disease identification. The application will guide users through a step-by-step process, starting with the
description of symptoms and culminating in a potential diagnosis based on an intelligent questioning system.
Key Features:
• Symptom Analysis with AI:
• Users will input symptoms, and the AI will analyze the data to identify the affected areas of the body.
• Body Model Reference:
• The AI will reference a model of the human body to pinpoint the regions corresponding to reported symptoms.
• Intelligent Questioning System:
• Through a progressive series of questions, the application will delve into potential causes, ranging from muscle
strains due to physical impact to stress-related issues and even underlying heart conditions.
• Probability Chart:
• The system will generate a probability chart, mapping out potential illnesses based on the user's reported
symptoms.
Objectives:
• Develop a user-friendly interface for symptom input.
• Implement an AI system capable of analyzing and interpreting symptoms effectively.
• Create a dynamic questioning system for a thorough exploration of potential health issues.
• Ensure accuracy in disease probability assessment.
Expected Impact:
This AI-driven health diagnosis application has the potential to revolutionize the way individuals approach health concerns.
By offering a structured and intelligent process, users can receive preliminary insights into potential illnesses, facilitating
informed discussions with healthcare professionals.

Keywords:
• Health Diagnosis
• Artificial Intelligence (AI)
• Symptom Analysis
• Disease Identification
• Intelligent Questioning System
• Machine Learning
• Healthcare Technology
1001BF-01 Güncelleme Tarihi: 07/04/2020

1
 • Digital Health
• Symptom-based Diagnosis
• Medical AI Application
• Human Body Model
• Healthcare Innovation
• Disease Probability Assessment
• User-Friendly Health Apps
• Innovative Health Solutions

1. BACKGROUND RESEARCH & ACADEMIC SURVEY

The scope, limits and importance of the subject addressed in the project proposal are explained with qualitative or
quantitative data as well as a critical evaluation of the literature.

• 1 ) Ada Health:
• Drawback: Provides a general symptom check but may be limited in identifying specific diseases.
• Project Strength: More comprehensive symptom analysis and a question-and-answer system for more
specific diagnoses.
• 2) Buoy Health:
• Drawback: Evaluates some basic symptoms but lacks an in-depth question-and-answer system.
• Project Strength: Enhanced question-asking algorithm and a more extensive disease database.
• 3) IBM Watson Health:
• Drawback: Primarily designed for healthcare professionals and may lack a user-friendly interface for
the general public.
• Project Strength: User-friendly interface and an approach catering to a broader user base.
• 4) Google Health Search:
• Drawback: Provides basic information but has limited interactive symptom analysis.
• Project Strength: More interactive diagnosis process with intelligent questions and broader coverage
of diseases.
• 5) Symptomate:
• Drawback: Offers general symptom check but may occasionally miss accurate diagnoses.
• Project Strength: Advanced symptom analysis and a more precise diagnostic algorithm.
• 6) Your.MD:
• Drawback: Evaluates general symptoms but may struggle to make accurate diagnoses.
• Project Strength: In-depth symptom analysis and a broad disease database for more accurate
diagnoses.
• 7) Adastra Labs:
• Drawback: Checks general symptoms but is limited in providing personalized recommendations
based on user profiles.
• Project Strength: Personalized diagnoses and the ability to offer user-focused recommendations.

1001BF-01 Güncelleme Tarihi: 07/04/2020

2
 • 8) Babylon Health:
• Drawback: Assesses basic symptoms but may face challenges in handling complex situations.
• Project Strength: High-level symptom analysis and the ability to handle complex situations.
• 9) Buena Salud:
• Drawback: Provides general health information but lacks an interactive symptom analysis feature.
• Project Strength: User-friendly interface and interactive symptom analysis for more accurate
diagnoses.
• 10) Qventus:
• Drawback: Monitors general health information but lacks the ability to analyze specific symptoms in
depth.
• Project Strength: Advanced symptom analysis and better understanding of specific conditions.
• 12) DiagnosisOne:
• Drawback: Checks general symptoms but lacks the ability to analyze specific medical images.
• Project Strength: Integrated symptom analysis with medical images and diagnosis based on these
images.
• 13) IBM Watson for Oncology:
• Drawback: Specifically focuses on oncology and may be limited in general health diagnosis.
• Project Strength: In-depth analysis in oncology and the ability to address specific conditions.
• 14) K Health:
• Drawback: Evaluates general symptoms but may struggle to handle complex situations quickly.
• Project Strength: Quick and effective symptom analysis for rapid diagnosis.
• 15) Symptoma:
• Drawback: Checks general symptoms but may be limited in identifying rare diseases.
• Project Strength: Focus on rare diseases, with an emphasis on a broad disease database and
comprehensive analysis.
• 16) Aysa Health:
• Drawback: Evaluates general symptoms but is limited in identifying specific conditions.
• Project Strength: Specific symptom analysis and a broad disease database for more accurate
diagnoses.
• 17) Cleveland Clinic Express Care Online:
• Drawback: Assesses general health conditions but lacks an interactive symptom analysis.
• Project Strength: Interactive symptom analysis and the ability to provide rapid diagnoses.
• 18) Vida Health:
• Drawback: Checks basic symptoms but does not have a comprehensive disease database.
• Project Strength: Comprehensive disease database and specific symptom analysis.
• 19) Buoy Labs:
• Drawback: Evaluates general symptoms.
• Project Strength: In-depth symptom analysis and a better understanding of specific conditions.
• 20) LifeDojo:
• Drawback: Assesses general health conditions but lacks an interactive symptom analysis.
• Project Strength: User-friendly interface and interactive symptom analysis for more accurate
diagnoses.

Aims and goals

The purpose and objectives of the project proposal are written in a way that is clear, measurable, realistic and achievable
throughout the project.

1001BF-01 Güncelleme Tarihi: 07/04/2020

3
 Purpose: The primary purpose of the project is to develop an innovative AI-assisted health diagnosis application that
empowers individuals to gain preliminary insights into potential health issues based on reported symptoms. By
integrating advanced technologies and intelligent questioning systems, the project aims to democratize access to
early health assessments.
Objectives:
• Develop User-Friendly Interface: Create an intuitive and user-friendly interface for symptom input, ensuring
accessibility for a diverse user base.
• Implement Advanced AI Analysis: Integrate a robust AI system capable of analyzing and interpreting
symptoms accurately, providing reliable insights to users.
• Establish Dynamic Questioning System: Design and implement a dynamic questioning system that guides
users through a comprehensive exploration of potential health issues based on reported symptoms.
• Ensure Accuracy in Diagnosis Probability: Develop a system that generates accurate probability charts,
mapping out potential illnesses with a high degree of precision.
• Facilitate Informed Discussions: Enable users to engage in informed discussions with healthcare
professionals by providing a structured summary of potential health issues.
Measurability: The success of the project will be measured through quantitative metrics, including the accuracy of
AI-assisted diagnoses, user satisfaction ratings, and the effectiveness of the questioning system in facilitating
informed discussions.
Realism: The goals set forth in the proposal are realistic, considering the current advancements in AI and health
technology. The iterative development process allows for the incorporation of user feedback and the adaptation of the
application to evolving medical knowledge.
Achievability: The project goals are achievable within the proposed timeline and budget. The team possesses the
necessary expertise in AI, health diagnostics, and application development to successfully execute the project

2. METHOD

The methods and research techniques (including data collection tools and analysis methods) to be applied in the project are
explained with reference to the relevant literature. It is demonstrated that the methods and techniques are suitable for
achieving the goals and objectives envisaged in the project.

The Methods section should cover the design of the research, dependent and independent variables, and statistical
methods. If any preliminary work or feasibility has been made in the project proposal, they are expected to be submitted.
Methods must be associated with work package

Research Design:
The research design of our project involves a multi-faceted approach, blending elements of health
informatics, artificial intelligence, and user experience design. Drawing inspiration from
established practices in these fields, our methodology aims to create a seamless and effective
process for health diagnosis.
Data Collection Tools: To gather comprehensive and relevant data, we will develop a user-friendly
interface that allows individuals to input their symptoms effortlessly. This interface will serve as
the primary data collection tool, ensuring the systematic capture of diverse health-related
information.

1001BF-01 Güncelleme Tarihi: 07/04/2020

4
1001BF-01 Güncelleme Tarihi: 07/04/2020

5
3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT

3.1. Work Packages (WP), Task Distribution and Duration

3.1.1. Timeline

The duration of the main work packages to be included in the project is given by filling out the "Work-Time Schedule".

WORK-TIME SCHEDULE (*)

The Importance of the MONTHS

WP id* WP Name*
success of the
Project(%)** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Project %5
1
Initialization

System Design and %15

2
Architecture

User Interface %10

3
Development

AI System %20
4
Implementation

Integration of
5 Body Model %10
Reference
Intelligent
6
Questioning
%15
System
Development

7
Statistical %7
Validation

%5
8 Feasibility Studies

Project Evaluation %13

9
and Reporting
3.2. Risk Management

The risks that may adversely affect the success of the project and the measures to be taken to ensure the successful
execution of the project when these risks are encountered (Plan B) are outlined in the Risk Management Table below by
specifying the relevant work packages. Possible risks related to the research question and/or hypothesis of the project are
taken into consideration. The implementation of plan B should not deviate from the core objectives and original value of the
project. If there is a method change in case of switching to plan B, this situation should be detailed. Work packages for which
no risk is foreseen are not included in this section.

WP
Definition of Risk(s) Action(s) to be Taken (Plan B)
ID*
Develop a streamlined communication plan for
Potential delays in Project Initialization due to administrative processes. Identify alternative
1
unforeseen administrative challenges administrative pathways to ensure project commencement
remains on schedule.
Cross-training team members to ensure redundancy in
System Design and Architecture may face setbacks if
2 crucial roles. Maintain an updated knowledge repository to
key team members are unavailable
minimize knowledge silos.

Establish a robust feedback loop with end-users to

User Interface Development may be hindered by promptly address evolving requirements. Prioritize
3
changes in user requirements flexibility in the design to accommodate changes without
major disruptions.

Explore cloud-based AI solutions to scale resources.

AI System Implementation might face resource
4 Collaborate with external AI experts or organizations if
constraints affecting model training
additional resources are needed.

Integration of Body Model Reference could be Establish collaboration with medical data repositories.
5 impeded by unavailability of relevant anatomical Develop alternative methods for referencing body models
data in the absence of specific data.

Conduct user acceptance testing early in the development

Development of the Intelligent Questioning System
6 phase. Implement iterative improvements based on user
may encounter challenges in user acceptance
feedback to enhance system acceptance.

Investigate data augmentation techniques to expand the

Statistical Validation may be compromised by
7 dataset. Consider collaborating with research institutions
limited data availability
or healthcare providers to access additional relevant data.

Consult legal experts to address potential ethical and legal

Feasibility Studies may unveil unforeseen ethical or
8 challenges. Be prepared to modify the project scope or
legal concerns
approach in accordance with ethical guidelines.

(*) Rows in the table can be expanded and multiplied as needed.

3.3.

Muhammet İsa Yurt

2104238