Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Lacanian Perspectives On Blade Runner 2049 Calum Neill Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Lacanian Perspectives On Blade Runner 2049 Calum Neill Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Lacanian Perspectives On Blade Runner 2049 Calum Neill Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/ethics-and-psychology-beyond-
codes-of-practice-1st-edition-calum-neill/
https://textbookfull.com/product/reading-lacan-s-ecrits-from-
overture-to-this-collection-to-presentation-on-psychical-
causality-1st-edition-calum-neill-derek-hook-and-stijn-vanheule/
https://textbookfull.com/product/turbine-blade-investment-
casting-die-technology-bu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/beast-quest-21-le-chaudron-
magique-adam-blade/
Lacanian Realism Political and Clinical Psychoanalysis
Duane Rousselle
https://textbookfull.com/product/lacanian-realism-political-and-
clinical-psychoanalysis-duane-rousselle/
https://textbookfull.com/product/blockade-runner-privateer-
tales-1st-edition-mcfarlane-jamie/
https://textbookfull.com/product/artificial-intelligence-and-the-
two-singularities-1st-edition-calum-chace/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-rum-runner-maxwell-craig-
series-first-edition-newman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/art-death-and-lacanian-
psychoanalysis-1st-edition-efrat-biberman/
THE PALGRAVE LACAN SERIES
SERIES EDITORS: CALUM NEILL · DEREK HOOK
Lacanian
Perspectives on
Blade Runner 2049
Edited by
calum neill
The Palgrave Lacan Series
Series Editors
Calum Neill
Edinburgh Napier University
Edinburgh, UK
Derek Hook
Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, USA
Jacques Lacan is one of the most important and influential thinkers of
the 20th century. The reach of this influence continues to grow as we
settle into the 21st century, the resonance of Lacan’s thought arguably
only beginning now to be properly felt, both in terms of its application
to clinical matters and in its application to a range of human activities
and interests. The Palgrave Lacan Series is a book series for the best new
writing in the Lacanian field, giving voice to the leading writers of a new
generation of Lacanian thought. The series will comprise original mono-
graphs and thematic, multi-authored collections. The books in the series
will explore aspects of Lacan’s theory from new perspectives and with
original insights. There will be books focused on particular areas of or
issues in clinical work. There will be books focused on applying Laca-
nian theory to areas and issues beyond the clinic, to matters of society,
politics, the arts and culture. Each book, whatever its particular concern,
will work to expand our understanding of Lacan’s theory and its value in
the 21st century.
Lacanian Perspectives
on Blade Runner
2049
Editor
Calum Neill
School of Applied Sciences
Edinburgh Napier University
Edinburgh, UK
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2021
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher,
whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting,
reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical
way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software,
or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt
from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained
herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with
regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland
AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
For Claire,
with one more kiss, dear.
Contents
vii
viii Contents
Index 229
Notes on Contributors
ix
x Notes on Contributors
xiii
1
From Voight-Kampff to Baseline Test:
By Way of an Introduction
Calum Neill
The original Blade Runner film, set in November 2019, opens with the
now iconic scene of Leon, a replicant, undergoing what appears to be a
psychological association-reaction test. He complains of getting nervous
when he takes tests but is told not to worry. “You’re in a desert,” Holden,
the test administrator, tells him, “Walking along in the sand, when all of
a sudden you look down…”
“What one?” Leon interrupts. He is told it doesn’t matter, that it is
completely hypothetical. But he persists, asking how he would have come
to be there.
“Maybe you’re fed up.” Holden tells him, adding some emotional
flavour. “Maybe you want to be by yourself. Who knows?” Then he
continues with the script. “You look down and see a tortoise, Leon. It’s
crawling toward you…”
“Tortoise? What’s that?”
C. Neill (B)
School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
e-mail: c.neill@napier.ac.uk
Holden asks him if he has seen a turtle and tells him it is the same
thing. When Leon says that he’s never actually seen a turtle, Holden
begins to show irritation. Leon picks up on this and reassures Holden,
saying “But I understand what you mean.”
Holden resumes, “You reach down and you flip the tortoise over on
its back, Leon.”
But Leon is having trouble focusing. “Do you make up these ques-
tions, Mr. Holden? Or do they write them down for you?”
“The tortoise lays on its back,” Holden continues, the audio track
reverberating, presumably allowing us, the viewer, to enter into Leon’s
disorientation, “its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs, trying
to turn itself over. But it can’t. Not without your help. But you’re not
helping.”
“What do you mean, I’m not helping?”
“I mean, you’re not helping. Why is that, Leon?”
Leon’s distress is now quite clear. Holden changes his tone and
attempts to reassure him.
“They’re just questions, Leon. In answer to your query, they’re written
down for me. It’s a test, designed to provoke an emotional response.”
It appears to have succeeded. “Shall we continue?” Holden asks. He
continues.
“Describe in single words only the good things that come into your
mind, about your mother …”
“My mother?”
“Yeah.”
“Let me tell you about my mother,” replies Leon, leaning forward, his
hands under the table. And he shoots Holden.
The Voight-Kampff test is, as Holden says, designed to provoke an
emotional reaction. The apparatus Holden unfolds at the outset of
the test, functioning a little like a lie-detector, measures physiological
changes, with a particular emphasis on eye movement. The logic of
the test appears to be rooted in emotion. Replicants, the humanoids
manufactured by the Tyrell Corporation, emerge as fully formed adults.
They have no childhood and therefore no childhood memory. They do,
however, appear to be capable of desire, with the suggestion, then, of
some kind of emotional attachment. The test, in the small samples we
1 From Voight-Kampff to Baseline Test … 3
are shown of it, seems to operate on the basis of provoking the expo-
sure of the gap between the awareness of the appropriacy of emotion
and the lack of such appropriate emotion. When Holden describes the
overturned tortoise, Leon appears to know that a reaction is expected of
him and yet he doesn’t know, or doesn’t feel, what this reaction is.
The dénouement of the scene, with the invocation of the mother,
seems pertinent in a psychoanalytic context. Where the tortoise merely
provokes discomfort, the mention of his mother provokes a strong,
violent, or murderous, reaction. Except Leon doesn’t or didn’t have a
mother. It is plausible that Leon’s reaction is nothing at all to do with
the specific content of Holden’s questions and is simply a pre-emptive
reaction to the obvious point that he is about to be found out as being a
replicant. And yet, the content cannot be ignored.
The test can be understood to operate on a logic of difference. The
presence of an appropriate reaction––whatever that might be––would,
presumably, indicate a likelihood that the subject is not a replicant. We
might assume then, that the absence of an appropriate reaction would
indicate that the subject is a replicant. However, this is not the case. It is
the anticipation of the absence of an appropriate emotional reaction on
the part of the subject themselves which appears to be the true point of
confirmation. The test centres on the subject’s own knowledge of their
status, whether this knowledge is consciously known or not. It is not,
however, a knowledge of what is but, rather, a knowledge of what might
not be.
This point of anticipation exposes something crucial of the Carte-
sian core of the original film. The three central characters each occupy
a particular stance towards the question of their knowledge of their
own essence. Roy Baty, the leader of the rogue gang of replicants
knows that he is a replicant. Rachel, a prototype of a newer model
of replicant, appears to know that she is a replicant but struggles to
acknowledge this knowledge. She knows but does not believe (Neill,
2018; 218). Deckart, the Blade Runner, we might, then assume, knows
he is not a replicant. A key driver of the film, however, is the uncer-
tainty of this knowledge. We, the spectator, are led to doubt the veracity
of Deckart’s knowledge, without this doubt ever settling into a new
certainty. Forty years after the original film’s release, through various
4 C. Neill
alternative cuts and sequels (Blade Runner 2049 was preceded by three
interim short films), both Deckhart’s ontological and epistemological
status remain uncertain. Even the screenwriters and directors are not in
agreement.
The status of replicants, by the time of 2049, appears, on the surface
at least, more definite. The new model of replicant, the Nexus 9s, and
the older models, whom the Nexus 9 Blade Runner, K., is deployed to
terminate, are equally aware of their replicant status. Like Rachel, they
have their own memories, developed since their inception, and they have
implanted childhood memories. Like Roy Baty, they are clear as to their
replicant status, both in terms of their fundamental being and in terms
of their subordinated social position. Where, however, Roy’s certainty is
an unhappy one, and one which motivates the failed rebellion he insti-
gates, the Nexus 9 replicants have been designed such that they can sit
with their status and will obey humans unfailingly. To ensure this obedi-
ence and safeguard against the risk of revolt, the Nexus 9s are subject to
routine tests, referred to as the Baseline Test.
The Baseline Test consists of a disrupted recitation of a section from
the central poem from Vladimir Nabakov’s Pale Fire. After the repli-
cant’s initial recitation of the section, selected words are abstracted and
repeated, intercut with provocative questions. The task appears to be for
the replicant is to repeat the abstracted words without being drawn into
or disturbed by the questions.
The section of the poem from Pale Fire, lines 703–707, reads as
follows:
The first time we see K. subjected to the test, the repeated words are
‘within’, ‘cells’ and ‘interlinked’, either alone or as phrases. The second
time we see him take the test, the words ‘dreadfully’, ‘distinct’ and ‘dark’
are added. The abstraction of the words, and the questions which follow
them, draw our attention to two sides of language. On the level of
what we would, in a Lacanian idiom, call the symbolic, language has no
1 From Voight-Kampff to Baseline Test … 5
Night-Terrors.
The preceding argument will render it easy to comprehend the
phenomena of night-terrors. These are commonly observed in young
children of a highly nervous temperament before the conclusion of
their second dentition. The subjects of the disorder are generally of
neurotic descent. Insanity, hysteria, neurasthenia, epilepsy, chorea,
and nervous dyspepsia are often discovered among their near
relatives. Not infrequently they have been or will become themselves
choreic.
Such paroxysms occur during the early part of the night, one or two
hours after the child has been put to bed, just at the time when,
according to the previously-quoted experiments of Kohlschütter,
sleep is passing from its maximum intensity to a lesser degree of
depth. This, then, is the time when the controlling power of the
sensory apparatus over other portions of the nervous system has
already reached its minimum. The spinal centres and those
intracranial ganglia which do not share in the full measure of this
repose are therefore in a condition of relative exaltation.
Disturbances of internal organs consequently produce inordinate
excitement of these waking portions of the nervous apparatus. The
morbid quality of this excitement is attested both by the history of the
patient and by the fact that it does not arouse the whole brain. The
distribution of motion in the cerebrum is impeded, so that certain
portions of the organ remain asleep while other regions are thrown
into a state of tumultuous uproar. Disconnection of these different
organs of the nervous system, by withdrawing particular portions
from the inhibitory influence of the remaining parts, gives opportunity
for violent explosions of nervous force analogous to the convulsions
of a headless fowl or to the course of an epileptic paroxysm. Now, in
sleep, in somnambulism, in hypnotism, in delirium, in certain stages
of intoxication with alcohol or with narcotics, such ungearing of the
different nervous ganglia is more or less completely effected. In
narcotic and anæsthetic sleep besides the disassociation of ganglia
there is paresis of the nervous molecules; hence the phenomena
soon merge into insensibility and coma. But in natural sleep, in
somnambulism, or in hypnotism there is no toxic paresis; hence the
dissociated portions of the brain and nervous system, if aroused, are
in a physiological condition to dispense great stores of force. Hence
the vividness of certain dreams and the astonishing vigor of
particular nervous functions in somnambulism and hypnotism.
Somnambulism.
The departures from the course of natural sleep which have been
thus considered are not so much the direct consequence of acute
disease as the result of structural deviation from the normal type of
the nervous system. We must now briefly review the strictly
pathological modifications to which sleep is liable.
Lithæmic Insomnia.
Among those who indulge freely in the pleasures of the table a form
of insomnia is not uncommon. Originating at first in mere overloading
of the stomach, and consisting in a direct irritation of the brain
through the medium of the intervening nervous apparatus,
sleeplessness finally becomes a symptom of more serious mischief.
The tissues become charged with nitrogenous waste, and a
lithæmic25 or gouty condition is established. Such patients are
wakeful, or if they sleep their slumbers are imperfect and
unrefreshing.26 Grinding of the teeth,27 noticed by Graves during the
sleep of the gouty, is a symptom indicative of a highly irritable
condition of important ganglia at the base of the brain. These
symptoms are sometimes associated with turgidity of the superficial
vessels of the head, indicating imperfect function of the circulatory
organs, with a tendency to accumulation of the blood in the venous
channels of the body. The sleep of such partially-asphyxiated
patients is fitful, irregular, and akin to stupor. Occurring in the
subjects of periodical gout, these disturbances of sleep become
increasingly serious as the paroxysm is approached, until loss of
sleep and the unrefreshing character of such slumber as may be
obtained become important factors among the causes of failing
health.
25 DaCosta, “Nervous Symptoms of Lithæmia,” Am. Journ. Med. Sci., Oct., 1881.
Febrile Insomnia.