Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research V2 Final 2.0 1
Research V2 Final 2.0 1
Research V2 Final 2.0 1
BALIUAG UNIVERSITY
Submitted to:
Mrs. Amelita
Cruz
Submitted by:
Mendoza, Jayson
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The researchers would like to sincerely thank the Engineer for serving as their research adviser.
Thank you, Ms. Amelita B. Cruz, for all your help, patience, and wisdom during this whole
process. The researchers are incredibly appreciative of her help in designing this study, giving
them access to useful materials, and supporting them at every turn.
The researchers would also like to express their gratitude to their friends for giving them
important information and much-needed inspiration during this study. They are
incredibly grateful for their input and assistance.
Finally, they would like to thank the respondents for their enthusiasm and dedication throughout
this study. The researchers are truly grateful for their cooperation and contribution to this
research.
3
ABSTRACT
In contrast to students from low-income families, who are unable to pursue higher
education at reputable universities, those with better financial standing can receive quality
instruction from globally recognized educational institutions. The objective of this study is to
find out the impact between maintaining scholarship and engineering students' learning behavior
at Baliuag University. This study will be conducted on the students of the engineering
department consist of 2ndyr. and 3rdyr. students. A scholarship is a way for a student to lessen
their expenses in university education. The study employs a survey questionnaire to collect data
that helps to answer how scholarship impacts students' learning behavior.
Table of Contents
Abstract 3
Introduction 5
Research Instrument 15
Statistical Treatment 15
Summary of Findings 27
Conclusions 28
Recommendations 28
References 30
Appendix A B 35
Curriculum Vitae 41
5
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The primary objective of this study is to gather evidence on how maintaining scholarship
impacts the student's learning behavior. Scholarship grants or University scholarships may be
given to an
6
engineering student at Baliuag University to help pay for miscellaneous, tuition, and other
educational costs. Engineering students from Baliuag University who have been awarded
scholarships by the institution participate in this study.
The Statement of the Problem focuses on the research title's underlying problems. It is
divided into two sections: General Problems and Specific Problems. Whereas the General
Problem determines the relationship between the study's two variables, the Specific Problems are
more specific and originate from the General Problem.
Main Problem:
This study was conducted to determine the impact between maintaining scholarships and
engineering students’ learning behavior at Baliuag University
Specific Questions:
This study was undertaken to find out the impact of maintaining scholarship on
engineering students' learning behavior and to know the response of the students. Benefitting the
study are the various sectors as follows:
Students: The direct recipients of the output of this study are the students who were granted
scholarships. The result of this study will help them to understand how maintaining scholarship
impacts their learning behavior.
Parents: The research benefits the parents of the student. As parents take care of their children,
they must know the impact of maintaining scholarship on their child’s learning behavior.
7
Researcher: The researchers also gain the significance of this study. This study may benefit them
in knowing further about the impact of scholarship on the learning behavior of an engineering
student.
Future Researcher: This study benefits the future researcher. The future researcher can also gain
the significance of the study. It may serve as their guidance to gather information for their study.
This study also serves as a useful reference for future researchers who will conduct similar
research related to this study.
The term "Impact Between Maintaining Scholarship and Engineering Students Learning
Behavior at the Baliuag University" describes how scholarships affect engineering students at
Baliuag University, in terms of their professional, academic, and personal growth. With the help
of scholarships, students can pursue their engineering education without having to worry about
money. Scholarships affect several things, including academic achievement, employment
opportunities, personal development, and community involvement.
This study is limited to the 2 nd year and 3rd year engineering students of Baliuag
University because of the accessibility of the school to the researcher. The researcher focuses on
participants at the College of Environmental Design and Engineering students because they are
the subjects of the impact of maintaining scholarship on the student’s learning behavior.
8
CHAPTER 2
SCHOLARSHIP
Thompson, E. (2023) is a prominent scholar in the field of higher education known for
her expertise in student success. Her review of related literature provides a comprehensive
examination of the impact of scholarship on students. Thompson’s review synthesizes findings
from a wide range of studies exploring the effects of scholarships on various outcomes such as
academic achievement, retention, and degree completion. Through her analysis, Dr. Thompson
identifies key factors that mediate the relationship between scholarships and student success,
such as socioeconomic background, institutional support services, and academic engagement.
The review also discusses methodological considerations and limitations of existing research,
providing insights into avenues for future inquiry.
In line with Williams, J. (2022). Study his review looks at the various ways that
scholarships affect student outcomes, including graduation rates, perseverance, and academic
achievement. By using her study, Dr. Williams finds ways and practices that have the potential to
maximize the impact of scholarships on students' performance. These include evidence-based
policy approaches and focused support services. The assessment also addresses how equal access
and achievement in higher education might be promoted via practice and policy.
Matthew Robinson’s (2023) review synthesizes findings from various research articles
and identifies key factors that contribute to the effectiveness of scholarship programs in
promoting student retention and graduation. This includes the design of scholarship criteria, the
provision of
9
additional support services, and the role of institutional policies in supporting scholarship
recipients.
IMPACT OF SCHOLARSHIP
Habiba (2022) discusses the impact of scholarships on student careers, focusing on the
case of the Foundation Next Generation Scholarship in Kosovo. The author highlights Kosovo’s
status as a young country with a significant youth population and emphasizes the role of
investment in its development. The country has attracted financial resources from various
international and local organizations, including NGOs, aimed at positively influencing the
economic environment. The passage references another study by Habiba, which examines the
impact of scholarships on student academic achievement in Punjab, Pakistan. The study’s
findings suggest that scholarships create a competitive environment among students, inspire
them to achieve their goals, and encourage attentive study habits. Scholarships also help students
manage their time effectively, develop a habit of book reading, and achieve better academic
performance.
In general, Dr. Adams’ review advances our knowledge of how scholarships support
students’ academic achievement. The review offers useful insights for policymakers,
practitioners, and academics interested in creating and implementing scholarship programs that
optimize their influence on student accomplishment by combining empirical evidence and
identifying best practices.
LEARNING BEHAVIOR
Johnson, E. (2022), stated that her analysis provides insights into practical tactics for
fostering positive learning behaviors and boosting student success in educational settings. The
review covers a wide range of topics related to learning behavior, including cognitive processes,
motivation, self-regulated learning, and the impact of instructional strategies on student
engagement. The review delves into the significance of the findings for curriculum creation,
student support services, and instructional practices to create the best possible learning
environments for a diverse student body. Overall, by combining research evidence and offering
insightful advice to educators, researchers, and policymakers interested in enhancing teaching
and learning methods, Dr. Johnson’s review adds to the body of knowledge in the field.
Lee, B. (2023), review covers various aspects of learning behavior, including cognitive
processes, motivation, self-regulated learning, and the role of technology in shaping learning
behaviors. His analysis offers insights into the complex dynamics of learning behavior and
highlights implications for educational practice and policy. The review also discusses
methodological considerations and directions for future research to further advance the
understanding of learning behavior in diverse educational contexts. Overall, the review
contributes to scholarship literature by synthesizing research evidence and providing valuable
guidance for educators, researchers, and policymakers interested in promoting effective teaching
and learning practices.
According to Garcia, J, (2022), her review covers a wide range of topics related to
learning behavior, including cognitive processes, motivation, self-regulated learning, and the
11
Smith, D. (2023), Smith’s review covers a broad spectrum of topics related to learning
behavior, including cognitive processes, motivation, self-regulated learning, and the role of
technology in shaping learning behaviors. By examining empirical research findings and
theoretical frameworks, the review identifies emerging trends and areas of consensus in the field.
Through his analysis, Dr. Smith offers insights into the complex dynamics of learning behavior
and highlights implications for educational practice and policy. The review also discusses
methodological considerations and directions for future research to further advance our
understanding of learning behavior in diverse educational contexts.
research provides insights into the sustained impact of financial aid on learning behaviors and
outcomes.
academic engagement and behaviors. Thompson’s findings reveal that need-based scholarships
have a significant positive impact on students’ learning behaviors. Quantitative analysis shows
that scholarship recipients exhibit higher levels of attendance, participation in class discussions,
and utilization of academic resources compared to non-recipients. Moreover, qualitative
interviews highlight the importance of financial support in alleviating stress related to
educational expenses, allowing students to focus more on their studies and engage more actively
in learning activities. Overall, Dr. Thompson’s research contributes valuable insights into the
role of need-based scholarships in shaping students’ learning behaviors and academic
experiences. By highlighting the positive effects of financial aid on student engagement and
performance, the study underscores the importance of equitable access to scholarships in
promoting student success in higher education.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
The illustration shows the connection between how scholarship influences the students in
their learning behavior. The visual demonstrates how related scholarship affects the student’s
motivation, increases their learning, and then their academic achievement highlighting the useful
impact of improving the overall educational experience of engineering students.
14
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This research was conducted to determine whether the questionnaire plays a significant
role in the impact between scholarship and engineering students learning behavior. This chapter
explains various methodologies that were used in gathering data and analysis that are relevant to
the research. The methodologies include areas such as the methods and techniques of the study,
population and sample of the study, research instrument, data gathering procedure, and data
processing and statistical treatment.
This study used a survey research design. Through their answers to questions, a sample of
people are surveyed for this kind of study to gather data. In quantitative research, statistical
analysis was utilized to investigate the correlation between the variables and the primary
purpose, evaluated and linked statistically. This study examines the relationship between
engineering students at Baliuag University and maintaining scholarships.
Students of the engineering programs of Baliuag University, specifically those in the year
2nd to 3rd year of mechanical, electrical, civil, and computer engineering, both male and female
with age ranges 18 to 20 make up the research's target population. Moreover, a few restrictions
and considerations are used. Thus, this study employed a purposive sampling strategy. The
20 questions compose the study questionnaire and collect data on the name, course, and age of
the respondents. Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Neutral (N), Disagree (D), and Strongly
Disagree (SD) are the four values on the Likert type scale that apply to Section B, of the
questionnaire.
15
Research Instrument
The researchers must wait for the research teacher to prepare a consent form. As a
courtesy, Ms. Amelita Cruz granted the all-clear and obtained explicit consent. After the letter
has been examined and authorized, and after we get the go-ahead to conduct the survey the
respondents will start to distribute the survey questionnaire.
Descriptive statistics can be used to characterize and interpret the data you gathered for
quantitative study on the “Impact between maintaining scholarship and engineering students’
behavior at Baliuag University” using a 5-point Likert scale. It is suggested to use the following
methodology for descriptive statistics:
16
4 3.40-4.19 Agree
3 2.60-3.39 Neutral
2 1.80-2.59 Disagree
In addition, the researchers measured the connection between the variables by interpreting the
correlation coefficient’s value. The following are the explanations for a correlation coefficient’s
value.
1. Mean (Average):
Determine the average value for every Likert scale item to ascertain the replies'
general trend.
∑𝑓 x
x̄ =
𝑁
respondents x̄ = mean
f = frequency
n = total of frequency
x= intervals
2. Range:
For every likert scale item, find the range by dividing the highest and lowest
value by the difference.
Range=Max Score−Min Score
3. Standard Deviation:
Calculate the standard deviation for each likert scale item to ascertain the
degree of variation or distribution of responses around the mean.
Standard Deviation
∑(x−x̄)2
𝑠= √ 𝑁
x̄ = Mean
n = total of frequency
∑ = Sum of…
4. Slovin’s:
𝑁
𝑛= 1+𝑁𝑒2
N = Population size
5. Pearson r:
𝑁 ∑ 𝑋𝑌−∑ 𝑋 ∑ 𝑌
𝑟=
√(𝑁 ∑ 𝑋2−(∑ 𝑋)2((𝑁 ∑ 𝑌2−(∑ 𝑌)2
∑ 𝑋 – Summation of X variable
∑ 𝑌 – Summation of Y variable
CHAPTER 4
This chapter presents the findings of the study through the results of the survey
questionnaire. The problem is interpreted and analyzed through statistical treatment. The data
gathered from the respondents answered the impact between scholarship and engineering student
learning behavior.
Frequency Percentage
BSCE 63 49.6%
BSME 36 28.3%
BSEE 20 15.7%
BSCpE 8 6.3%
TOTAL 127 100%
This table shows the distribution of the respondents regarding their courses. 63 of the
respondents come from BSCE with 49.6% frequency, 36 in BSME with 28.3% frequency, 20
respondents from BSEE with 15.7% frequency, and 8 from BSCpE with 6.3% frequency and an
overall total of 127 respondents from the engineering department. The sample size was able to
get by using slovin’s formula.
20
Present Course
6%
16%
50%
28%
This table shows the frequency of how many students have scholarships and those who
do not have scholarships. 42 of the respondents with 33.1% said that they are a scholarship
grantee, while 85 of the respondents with 66.9% said that they do not have a scholarship. With
21
this data the only respondents that the researcher will use will be the respondents with
scholarship.
33%
67%
Yes No
This table shows what kind of scholarship the respondents acquired. 31 or 73.8% of the
respondents say that they got their scholarship through a government scholarship, 10 or 23.8% of
the respondents say that they got their scholarship from the school, or they are a university
22
scholar, and lastly, 1 or 2.4% of the respondents say that they got their scholarship from a private
scholarship.
24%
74%
the consistency
of a student in
their study.
Scholarship 22 17 3 0 0 4.452 3.970 Strongly Agree
assistance
motivates
students to put
in a lot of
effort.
Scholarships 11 25 6 0 0 4.119 3.638 Agree
assist students
in becoming
more active in
school
Maintaining 16 18 4 4 0 4.095 3.677 Agree
scholarships
reduce the
dropout rate.
Scholarships are 15 22 4 1 0 4.214 3.748 Strongly Agree
the means
through which
underprivileged
students can
interact with
mid to higher-
income
students.
Scholarships 10 25 6 1 0 4.047 3.579 Agree
provide honor
and pride to the
students.
With the help of 16 11 12 3 0 3.952 3.552 Agree
scholarships,
students can live
better lives.
competitive
atmosphere
among students,
which motivates
them to pursue
their objectives.
listen
attentively in
class.
Maintaining 9 21 9 3 0 3.857 3.422 Agree
scholarships
increase the
ability to speak
in public with
great comfort.
Maintaining 12 22 4 4 0 4 3.572 Agree
scholarships
help kids gain
self-confidence,
which directly
improves all
their skills.
Table 4 shows the questionnaire results that answer questions from 1 – 20. The numbers
indicated in the section show the answers of every respondent who answered either “Strongly
Agree”, “Agree”, “Neutral”, “Disagree’, or “Strongly Disagree”. To aid in comprehending the
information gathered, the data in the table will be graphically displayed by question number in
the charts that follow.
In this table, shows the relationship between two variables. Age and scholarship scores
with 0.722, mean that the two have strong correlations. Age and learning behavior scores with
0.18, mean that the two have a weak correlation. While maintaining scholarship and learning
behavior scores with 0.811, means that the two have a very strong correlation.
26
Table 6: Statics
This tables shows the mean and median result corresponding to age, scores with both 20,
while in scholarship mean scores with 4.266 with median of 4.21, and in learning behavior
scores with 4.286 in mean and 2.24 in mean.
27
CHAPTER 5
This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusions, and recommendations from
the correlational study about the Impact Between Scholarship and Engineering Students'
Learning Behavior.
Summary of Findings
This study was conducted to determine the impact between scholarships and engineering
students’ learning behavior at Baliuag University
Conclusion
Several major conclusions resulted from an investigation into the impact of maintaining
scholarships on the learning behavior of engineering students at Baliuag University College of
Environmental Design and Engineering. The study found a substantial relationship between
scholarships and students' learning behavior, demonstrating that financial aid plays an important
role in affecting
28
Besides that, scholarships encourage students to feel responsible and accountable for their
academic performance. The fact that their education is financially supported pushes recipients to
set greater academic goals and strive for greatness. This resulted in better study habits, such as
consistent study sessions, excellent time management, and active participation in coursework.
Scholarships facilitate personal and professional development. Recipients felt increased
confidence and self-esteem after learning their academic achievements were recognized and
rewarded. Scholarships also provide networking opportunities, allowing students to interact with
industry professionals and obtain internships or job placements, thus improving their career
chances.
The findings emphasize the importance of scholarships in encouraging positive learning
practices and academic success among engineering students at Baliuag University. However, it is
critical to recognize that scholarships alone may not address all learning hurdles and that
additional support mechanisms, such as mentorship programs or academic counseling, may be
required to ensure overall student growth.
Recommendations
Based on the significance of this study, some recommendations are made to improve the
influence of scholarships on engineering students' learning behaviors at Baliuag University
College of Environmental Design and Engineering:
To the students: Despite having a scholarship or not, it is good to still better to give your best in
learning new things.
29
To the Parents: Given the enormous influence of parents on kids' educational experiences,
educational institutions, and scholarship sponsors should actively engage parents in talks about
the impact of maintaining scholarships on learning behavior. Providing resources and
information to parents can help them better support their children's academic aspirations.
To the Future Researchers: The researchers recommend lessening the scope of the study with a
certain course, in that way the data gathering procedure will be much less complicated to
accomplished.
30
References
Dr. Jonathan Nguyen (2023). The Influence of scholarship on student engagement and academic
performance.
https://ippgroup.vn/en/news/mr-johnathan-hanh-nguyen-received-the-medal-for-the-
cause-of-education-n4839
Dr. Rachel Mitchell (2022). Understanding the relationship between scholarship and student
motivation a qualitative analysis.
https://issuu.com/mitchellinstitute/docs/20222023_mitchell_institute_annual_report
Dr. Alexander Patel (2024). Examining the impact of scholarships on learning behavior among
first generation college students.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1011678.pdf
Dr. Sophia Carter (2021). The role p scholarship in promoting academic resilience among all-
risk students.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/sophia-carter-699232238
Dr. Emily Jackson Research (2023). The effects of merit-based scholarships on student
achievement learning behavior.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23548365_Student_Responses_to_Merit_Schol
arship_Retention_Rules
Sarah Kim (2021). Understanding the influence of need-based scholarships on student learning
behavior.
31
https://www.edquity.co/blog/what-are-need-based-scholarships-and-why-are-they-
important
Emily Chen (2023). The impact of scholarships on students accesses and success. A
comprehensive review.
https://www.ertegun.ox.ac.uk/people/emily-chen
Matthew Robinson (2023). The impact of scholarships on students’ graduation rates a review of
recent studies.
https://www.paralympic.org.au/2022/07/robinson-scholarship-goes-to-young-
snowboarder-with-big-dreams/
Habiba (2022)
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=impact+of+scholarship
+on+students&oq=Impact+of+scholarship+on+student#d=gs_qabs&t=170934476173
4&u=%23p%3DsYOVPjubuogJ
APPENDIX A
QUESTIONNAIRE
We are sophomores of BS Mechanical Engineering and BS Electrical Engineering we are
conducting a study entitled "IMPACT BETWEEN SCHOLARSHIP AND ENGINEERING
STUDENTS' LEARNING BEHAVIOR AT THE BALIUAG UNIVERSITY." as our final
requirement for the subject ESM 7 - Engineering Data Analysis (Statistics) and we would
appreciate your cooperation in our studies.
Name(optional):
Age:
Course:
BSME BSCE
BSEE BSCpE
Source: https://www.apjbet.com/index.php/apjbet/article/view/55
35
APPENDIX B
RAW DATA
Respondents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8
1 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5
2 4 5 4 3 4 3 4 3
3 4 4 4 3 5 4 3 4
4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 2
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5
7 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 3
8 4 4 3 3 5 4 5 5
9 4 4 5 4 3 5 3 3
10 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
11 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
12 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
13 5 3 4 4 5 5 4 3
14 4 5 5 4 4 4 3 5
15 4 4 5 5 5 4 3 5
16 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4
17 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4
18 5 5 5 4 4 3 4 3
19 5 5 5 4 4 3 4 3
20 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4
21 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4
22 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
23 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
24 5 5 5 3 4 4 5 3
25 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5
26 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4
27 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 3
28 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
29 4 5 4 4 3 3 3 2
30 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5
31 4 4 3 4 2 2 1 3
32 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3
33 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
34 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5
35 4 3 3 3 2 4 4 3
36 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
37 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
38 5 5 5 4 2 5 4 3
39 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 2
40 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5
41 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 5
42 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 5
36
SA A N D SA
Scholarships 21 21 0 0 0
give students
the
determination
they need to
improve their
talent.
Scholarships 21 19 2 0 0
are a
remarkable
means to show
appreciation
for students.
Scholarship 22 17 3 0 0
assistance
motivates
students to put
in a lot of
effort.
Scholarships 11 25 6 0 0
assist students
in becoming a
successful
person.
Scholarships 16 18 4 4 0
reduce the
dropout rate.
Scholarships are 15 22 4 1 0
the means
through which
underprivileged
students can
interact with
mid to higher-
income
students.
Scholarships 10 25 6 1 0
provide honor
and pride to the
students.
With the help of 16 11 12 3 0
scholarships,
students can live
better lives.
39
Scholarships 17 22 3 0 0
motivate
students to
pursue higher
education.
Scholarships 16 18 8 0 0
assist students
in developing
their social
values.
Scholarships 12 27 2 1 0
encourage a
competitive
atmosphere
among students,
which motivates
them to pursue
their
objectives.
Scholarships 11 24 5 2 0
provide a
secure and
welcoming
setting for
pursuing
academic
objectives.
Scholarships 16 22 2 2 0
lessen the
financial
barriers to
pursuing higher
education.
Scholarships 13 24 4 1 0
encourage them
to study
attentively
Scholarships 10 27 3 2 0
encourage
students to
study
consistently.
Scholarships 12 25 3 2 0
help students
become more
40
proficient
learners.
Scholarships 11 26 3 2 0
improve an
individual's
capacity to set
realistic goals
for a future
profession.
Students who 11 19 9 3 0
receive
scholarships are
better able to
adjust to the
economy.
Scholarships 9 21 9 3 0
increase the
ability to speak
in public with
great comfort.
Scholarships 12 22 4 4 0
help kids gain
self-confidence,
which directly
improves all
their skills.
41
CURRICULUM
VITAE