REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AGRICULTURE, AQUATIC AND NATURAL RESOURCES

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT HIGHLIGHTS 2023

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

CRITERIA
CATEGORY A: PAPER QUALITY MAXIMUM OF SCORES
I. Originality and Creativity
Theoretical or clinical significance of research
30
Creativity and originality of logic
Timeliness and uniqueness of ideas
II. Organization (Logical presentation of ideas)
Objectives/goals are clearly stated
Methods are appropriate for achieving goals 20
Results are clearly presented
Thoughts and ideas flow in a logical manner
Results accomplish the purposes of the project
TOTAL 50
CATEGORY B: PAPER PRESENTATION
I. Presentation (Oral Presentation and delivery)
Exhibits good body posture
10
Maintains good rapport with audience
Good diction; good articulation
II. Knowledge of Material (Familiarity with subject matter)
Exhibits knowledge of subject matter 20
Answers questions with confidence
III. Neatness (Neatness of charts and graphs)
Neat slides and/or transparencies
20
Free of marks and smudges
Visual materials are easy to read
TOTAL 50
GRAND TOTAL 100
 PAPER FORMAT FOR Regional Symposium for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources
Research and Development Highlights (RSRDH 2023)

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER

Author, A1, Author, B2, and Author, C3
1Institution 1
2Institution 2
3Institution 3
E-mail (corresponding author)

1. INTRODUCTION
The introduction must provide the background information of the research, the problem being addressed, and the
significance of the study in relation to the SDG, Ambisyon Natin 2040, PDP 2017-2022 or any other application/s.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The methodology must be clearly stated and described in sufficient detail or with sufficient references.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The findings and arguments of the work should be explicitly described and illustrated. Supporting figures and tables
mentioned in the results need to be included.

All the tables and figures should be centered. Figures and images should be numbered and figure headers should
be placed under the figure or image; as for the tables, they should also be numbered and the table header should be
placed at the top. References (if any) of the tables, figures and images should be presented right under the tables,
figures and images in the form of author surname and publication date.

4. CONCLUSION
Conclusions should include (1) the principles and generalisations inferred from the results, (2) any exceptions to, or
problems with these principles and generalisations, (3) theoretical and/or practical implications of the work, and
(5) conclusions drawn and recommendations.

5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to express appreciation for the support of the sponsors [Project Number = XXXXXXX].

6. REFERENCES
References should be listed arranged in alphabetical order beginning with the author’s names and initials, followed
by the year of publication, title of periodical, volume and page. Example: Parlange, J.Y., R. Haverkamp and J.
Touma. 1985. Infiltration under ponded condition: 1. Optimal analytical solution and comparison with
experimental observation. Soil Sci., 139: 305-311. In the text, references should be cited with the name of the
author(s) with the year of publication in parenthesis, e.g., Philip (1957), Taylor and Baker (1986), Smith et al.
(1987).