Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Humanized Coursebook CDA Report - in Search of Discriminatory Practices
The Humanized Coursebook CDA Report - in Search of Discriminatory Practices
My Frame of Analysis;
1-) How are different social groups visually represented in the coursebook? Do
the visuals reinforce or challenge stereotypical images, and how do they
contribute to the overall narrative on stereotyping?
- Rather than challenging the stereotype, the coursebook further reinforces the
stereotype. For example, women are always in the kitchen (never men), only boys
play football and basketball (there are no girls), characters depicted as fat always
have hamburgers in their hands (as if every fat person is fat because of the
hamburger, sometimes diseases cause this).isJust men are shown when describing
the adjective “strong”. Depicting only men as if only men could drive a motor vehicle.
Blue is the boy's color and pink is the girl's color. When I analyzed it, I came across a
lot of these stereotypes.
2-) To what extent does the coursebook incorporate visual diversity in terms of
race, ethnicity, gender, and other identity factors? Does it avoid perpetuating
visual stereotypes by presenting a varied and inclusive range of images?
- The coursebook does not contain any black, Asian or other ethnic people. They are
all white and healthy people. I would like disabled children to be shown blind or
disabled, etc. Because these people are among us too. Or I haven't seen a woman
wearing a headscarf. Why shouldn't this be in a coursebook when we have such
diversity in our daily lives? The people shown are white, healthy, and have almost the
same face. Therefore, this does not include diversity.
3-) How does the coursebook visually depict individuals with intersecting
identities? Does it acknowledge and represent the complexity of
intersectionality, or does it simplify these identities into stereotypical images?
- When I look at this intersection, I see the role of men and women. There are
conventionalized and stereotypical images that are simplified rather than adding to
complexity. The woman cooks in the kitchen, the man goes to work. The woman
takes care of the children, the man is not even around. Forget about a woman
cooking, there was even a visual depicting a girl cooking. This is beyond
stereotyping, it's a ridiculous image.
4-) Does the coursebook encourage learners to critically analyze visual
representations and question stereotypes portrayed in images? Are there
specific exercises or prompts that guide learners in interpreting and
deconstructing visual stereotypes?
- There are almost no open-ended questions. It includes low cognitive practices such
as true/false, fill-in-the-blank, etc., where children just look at the images. This may
be due to the fact that this book is at A1 level, but there are no special activities that
children can criticize. This may naturally cause children to get used to those images
and lose their own critical powers.
#Example 1
As I mentioned while answering the analysis questions, as if only boys could play
football or basketball, when I examined the entire book, I did not see any girl playing
basketball or football. There are images here that support the stereotype that "only
boys play football/basketball".
#Example 2
If it's a power-related issue, it's immediately "men/boys". These images also support
this idea. When I examined the entire coursebook, I did not see any visual that
associated women or girls with power. This supports this stereotype.
#Example 3
“People who eat hamburgers gain weight.” “Overweight people are people who eat
hamburgers.” When depicting overweight people in the images, they always have a
hamburger in their hands. I don't find this very logical. There are many people around
us and in the world who gain weight/obese due to illness. These visuals can give
children material to make fun of. They can make sentences such as "eat less burgers
and lose weight" with an overweight child in their class (due to illness). At the same
time, the images support a stereotype.
#Example 4
"Women's place is in the kitchen." visuals that reinforce the stereotype a lot. When I
went through the whole coursebook, I really didn't see women doing anything
different. Women either go shopping or cook in the kitchen and take care of their
children. As I mentioned in the frame analysis section, the second image even shows
a little girl cooking. But it would make much more sense if there was an image like
sister/brother instead.
#Example 5
When they depicted the motor vehicle as a show of power, they showed only men
driving it. As for the bike, there are a few images of the girls riding it. In other words,
while lighter, easier-to-drive vehicles are seen as suitable for girls, vehicles such as
motorcycles and cars are used by men. This again supports a stereotype.
#Example 6
"Boys wear blue and girls wear pink." Visuals support this traditional thinking. There
were many examples of this in the coursebook. Instead of including all of them, I
included the clearest images. In the first image, there are two colors directly put on
the babies, and in the second image, the girl wears clothes in pink and purple tones
and the boy wears orange and blue, which again shows that the images support
stereotypical ideas.
I would also like to show examples from the book "More and More" 4th grade a1
level, which I use in my private lessons.