Q: It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g.

Dinosaur, dodos…) There is no reason why

people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?

A:

In contemporary times, some view that WILDLIFE extinctions of wild animals are unavoidable because they are
part of the law of nature. While I acknowledge that contribution of funds to this area may cause neglect in the
fundamental living needs of the citizens, I firmly believe that preservation of wildlife is more beneficial to the
health of humans because of their values in medical research. In this essay, I will explore and expand my ideas,
along with evidence that supports my views.

On the one hand, advocates for this notion think that preservation of wildlife is a waste of economic resources.
They assert that, under a dynamic ecological environment, re-creation of suitable habitats for prolonging the
longevity of endangered fauna can unlikely be achieved. By continuing investments in this area, societal re-
sources for maintaining the overall well-being of citizens, for instance, educations and medical care, will be ad-
versely affected. According to a study conducted by the Indian Government in 2019, the vast majority of its
citizens supported a financial bill to re-allocate funds to the improvement of the educational system from
wildlife protection.

2. THEY ASSERT THAT FUNDS USED FOR WILDLIFE WOULD BE BETTER SPENT ELSEWHERE ON
MORE IMMEDIATE HUMAN NEEDS.

3. IN THIS WAY, EVEN THOUGHT HE ANIMALS WOULD SUFFER, HUMAN BEINGS CAN STILL
LIVE A COMFORTABLE LIFE;

4. FOR EXAMPLE, FUNDS COULD BE USED FOR MEDICAL CARE OR EDUCATION WHICH WOULD
IMPROVE THE OVERALL LIVES OF CITIZENS….

On the other hand, I would argue that it is of a greater importance to reduce the extent of wildlife extinction be-
cause of its scientific value. All kinds of living creatures on the earth have their respective ecological influences
on humans, particularly on medical treatment development. They enable scientists to research and develop new
medicines and vaccines from their genes for tackling human diseases. For example, the invention of vaccines
for easing the fatal effects of the SARS pandemic in 2002 was inspired by the DNA structures of a species of en-
dangered bats in Africa.

In conclusion, while animal protections may, from AN economic perspective, adversely affect the living
enjoyment of citizens, I strongly believe that IT HAS MANY BENEFITS. WHAT IS THE BENEFIT
(SCIENCE) AND I HOPE IT WILL CONTINUE IN THE FUTURE