Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Download PDF) Geospatial Applications For Natural Resources Management First Edition Singh Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
(Download PDF) Geospatial Applications For Natural Resources Management First Edition Singh Online Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/geospatial-practices-in-natural-
resources-management-2024th-edition-pravat-kumar-shit/
https://textbookfull.com/product/ecosystem-management-adaptive-
strategies-for-natural-resources-organizations-in-the-twenty-
first-century-aley/
https://textbookfull.com/product/thermodynamics-for-sustainable-
management-of-natural-resources-1st-edition-wojciech-stanek-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/electronic-resources-
implications-for-collection-management-first-edition-owens/
Redefining Diversity & Dynamics of Natural Resources
Management in Asia, Volume 1. Sustainable Natural
Resources Management in Dynamic Asia 1st Edition Ganesh
Shivakoti
https://textbookfull.com/product/redefining-diversity-dynamics-
of-natural-resources-management-in-asia-volume-1-sustainable-
natural-resources-management-in-dynamic-asia-1st-edition-ganesh-
shivakoti/
https://textbookfull.com/product/justice-and-natural-resources-
an-egalitarian-theory-first-edition-armstrong/
https://textbookfull.com/product/managing-human-resources-
parbudyal-singh/
https://textbookfull.com/product/new-frontiers-in-natural-
resources-management-in-africa-elias-t-ayuk/
Geospatial Applications for
Natural Resources Management
Geospatial Applications for
Natural Resources Management
Edited by
Chander Kumar Singh
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made
to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all
materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all
material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been
obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future
reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized
in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying,
microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the
publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://
www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923,
978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For
organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identifi-
cation and explanation without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
Chapter 4 Urban Imprints on City’s Environment—Unfolding Four Metro Cities of India ...... 51
Richa Sharma and P.K. Joshi
Chapter 7 Urban Growth and Management in Lucknow City, the Capital of Uttar Pradesh ...... 109
Akanksha Balha and Chander Kumar Singh
v
vi Contents
Chapter 9 Analysis of Drainage Morphometry and Tectonic Activity in the Dehgolan Basin
Kurdistan, Iran, Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System ...............131
Payam Sajadi, Amit Singh, Saumitra Mukherjee, Harshita Asthana,
P Pingping. Luo, and Kamran Chapi
Chapter 10 Fog—A Ground Observation-Based Climatology and Forecast over North India......151
Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Rohit Sharma, Kamna Sachdeva, and
Anu Rani Sharma
Chapter 15 Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Changes on Nutrient Concentration
in and around Kabar Tal Wetland, Begusarai (Bihar), India ................................... 243
Rajesh Kumar Ranjan and Priyanka Kumari
vii
viii List of Figures
Figure 4.1 The location of the four cities on a map of India ..................................................... 53
Figure 4.2 LULC maps for Chennai .......................................................................................... 58
Figure 4.3 LST zones and their areas under different LULC in Chennai for 1991, 2000,
and 2014 ................................................................................................................... 59
Figure 4.4 LST statistics for various LULC classes over the years for the city of Chennai .....60
Figure 4.5 LULC maps for Delhi ..............................................................................................60
Figure 4.6 LST zones and their areas under different LULC in Delhi for 1998, 2003,
and 2011.................................................................................................................... 62
Figure 4.7 LST statistics for various LULC classes over the years for the city of Delhi .......... 62
Figure 4.8 LULC maps for Kolkata........................................................................................... 63
Figure 4.9 LST zones and their areas under different LULC in Kolkata for 1989,
2006, and 2010 .........................................................................................................64
Figure 4.10 LST statistics for various LULC classes over the years for the city of Kolkata ...... 65
Figure 4.11 LULC maps of Mumbai for the years 1998 and 2009 .............................................66
Figure 4.12 LST maps for 1998 and 2009 ................................................................................... 67
Figure 4.13 LST statistics for various LULC classes over the years for the city of Mumbai ..... 68
Figure 5.1 Study area ................................................................................................................. 81
Figure 5.2 Land use and land cover (LULC) maps for Lucknow district for time period
2000–2031, depicting the changing land use on a temporal scale ........................... 82
Figure 6.1 Location map of the study area shown by LISS-IV imagery ...................................90
Figure 6.2 Methodology adopted ............................................................................................... 91
Figure 6.3 The structure of a three-layer ANN .........................................................................94
Figure 6.4 Representation of training pixels in 2D space between bands 3 and 4 ....................97
Figure 6.5 (a) SVMs with linear kernel, (b) SVMs with polynomial of degree 2 kernel,
(c) SVMs with radial basis kernel, and (d) SVMs with sigmoid function
kernel-based classification........................................................................................ 98
Figure 6.6 ANN-based classification ....................................................................................... 101
Figure 6.7 RF-based classification ........................................................................................... 102
Figure 7.1 Study area ............................................................................................................... 115
Figure 7.2 Land use land cover (LULC) maps for Lucknow district for years 2000,
2007, and 2017 ........................................................................................................ 116
Figure 7.3 Increasing built-up (urban) area from 2000 to 2017 ............................................... 117
Figure 7.4 Variation of spatial metrics derived using FRAGSTATS for built-up class over
the period of time ................................................................................................... 118
Figure 8.1 Study area for the present study. Stok and Matoo catchments are presented
in pink and blue boundary, and yellow boundary presents glacier/glacieret
outlines ................................................................................................................... 124
List of Figures ix
Figure 13.3 Observed rainfall and mean temperature for the four stations in Madhya
Pradesh, India. (a) Climatology of rainfall and mean temperature during
January to December, (b) seasonal mean (JJAS) rainfall anomaly for the
Balaghat, Jabalpur, Narsinghpur, and Seoni districts ............................................ 212
Figure 13.4 Composite of break phases during different RMM phases. (a) RMM phase 1,
(b) RMM phase 2, (c) RMM phase 6, (d) RMM phase 7, and (e) composite of
all phases (1, 2, 6, and 7) ........................................................................................ 213
Figure 13.5 Year-to-year variations in the observed rice yield. (a) Observed yield
and (b) simulated yield from 1990 to 2011 for the Balaghat, Jabalpur,
Narsinghpur, and Seoni districts ............................................................................ 214
Figure 13.6 Difference between the observed and simulated yield for (a) control runs
(b) by changing the genetic coefficients for IR36 rice crop ................................... 215
Figure 13.7 Observed anomaly and detrend anomaly of rice yield the (a) Balaghat,
(b) Jabalpur, (c) Narsinghpur, and (d) Seoni districts ............................................. 217
Figure 13.8 Model-simulated and MODIS evapotranspiration from 2000 to 2011 (per data
availability) for (a) Balaghat, (b) Jabalpur, (c) Narsinghpur, and (d) Seoni
districts ................................................................................................................... 218
Figure 13.9 RMSE of SM from remote sensing and model simulations during drought
years ....................................................................................................................... 219
Figure 14.1 Location of Sirsa River basin including towns and subbasins (numbers
indicate subbasin ID) .............................................................................................. 226
Figure 14.2 Sensitivity of water balance components to groundwater parameters.
(a) GWQMN, (b) REVAPMN, (c) GW_REVAP, and (d) RCHR_DP .................... 231
Figure 14.3 Sensitivity of water balance components to soil parameters. (a) SOL_Z,
(b) SOL_AWC, and (c) SOL_K.............................................................................. 232
Figure 14.4 Sensitivity of water balance components to HRU parameters. (a) EPCO,
(b) ESCO, and (c) CANMX.................................................................................... 234
Figure 14.5 Comparison of actual evapotranspiration (ETa) between SWAT simulation
and MODIS data at (a) daily (8-day composite) and (b) monthly time step
during calibration (2004–2006) and validation (2007–2008) periods ................... 235
Figure 14.6 Box-and-whisker plot of monthly deviation in evapotranspiration, that is, ∆ET
(SWAT ET—MODIS ET) for (a) daily (8-day cumulative), and (b) monthly
comparisons during the period of 2004–2008. The box-and-whisker plots
show the median, first, and third quartiles. The caps at the end of the boxes
show the extreme values ......................................................................................... 236
Figure 14.7 Average monthly ETa simulated from SWAT and MODIS data for the period
2004–2008. (a) Comparison of average monthly ET simulated from SWAT
model with MODIS ET and (b) scatter plot of SWAT simulated monthly ET
against monthly MODIS ET values ........................................................................ 237
Figure 14.8 Mean monthly value of selected hydrologic components of Sirsa basin for the
period of 2003–2008 .............................................................................................. 238
Figure 15.1 Map of the study area (Kabar Tal wetland) ............................................................ 245
Figure 15.2 Land use cover map of Kabar Tal wetland 1990, 2010, and 2015 ..........................246
xii List of Figures
Figure 15.3 Graph showing nutrients concentration (log scale) in and around Kabar Tal in
1990, 2012, and 2015 .............................................................................................. 247
Figure 16.1 Lithological map and thrust zones of Lesser Himalaya-Kumaun .......................... 254
Figure 16.2 The minimum noise fraction image obtained from the Hyperion scene ............... 257
Figure 16.3 n-dimensional space for endmember extraction (pure pixel) at
10,000 iterations, 2.5 threshold for PPI over the Hyperion image with the
axes of MNF bands, which are the dimensions of this subspace (ENVI
n-dimension Visualizer) ......................................................................................... 257
Figure 16.4 Schematic diagram of the methodology of the SAM method ................................ 261
Figure 16.5 Spectral curve matching of endmembers and the most suitable rock spectra
from the spectral library according to the equal weightage defined to the
spectral mapping methods. (a) and (b) Image end members matching with
serpentine marble, (c) image end members matching with chloritic gneiss and
(d) image end members matching with green quartzite ......................................... 263
Figure 16.6 Classified image of Hyperion data according to the equal weightage provided
to SAM and BE classifier spectral mapping methods ............................................264
Figure 16.7 Classified image of Hyperion data according to the 100% weightage provided
to BE classifier spectral mapping method .............................................................. 267
Figure 16.8 Classified image of Hyperion data according to a weightage factor of 0.6
(60%) of binary encoding and 0.4 (40%) of SAM classifier ................................... 269
Figure 16.9 Classified image of Hyperion data according to field spectral data of phyllite
and quartzite data collected using ASD-Spectroradiometer .................................. 271
Figure 17.1 Study area of Kaziranga National Park .................................................................. 278
Figure 17.2 Topography of Kaziranga National Park ................................................................ 278
Figure 17.3 Rainfall trend of the Kaziranga National Park region............................................ 279
Figure 17.4 Rainfall distribution of the Nagaon, Sonitpur, Golaghat, and Kaziranga
districts ................................................................................................................... 279
Figure 17.5 Land use land cover map ........................................................................................284
Figure 17.6 Flood map of Brahmaputra River ........................................................................... 285
Figure 17.7 Flood area statistics of grassland ............................................................................ 285
Figure 17.8 Water level anomalies derived from SARAL/AltiKa ............................................. 286
Figure 17.9 Interface of River App android application ............................................................. 287
Figure A.1 Surface albedo (α) ................................................................................................... 295
Figure A.2 Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) ................................................... 296
Figure A.3 Leaf area index (LAI) ............................................................................................. 296
Figure A.4 Soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) .................................................................... 297
Figure A.5 Surface emissivity ................................................................................................... 298
Figure A.6 Surface temperature (Kelvin) .................................................................................. 299
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Specifications of Landsat TM and OLI Data ................................................................. 3
Table 1.2 Table Showing the Change in the Area of the Various Land Use Categories
between 2005 and 2014 for Kuttanad (in km2) ..............................................................6
Table 2.1 Classification Description ............................................................................................ 15
Table 2.2 Land Use and Land Covers Distribution (1990) .......................................................... 17
Table 2.3 Land Use and Land Cover Distribution (2002)............................................................ 18
Table 2.4 Land Use and Land Cover Distribution (2014) ............................................................ 19
Table 2.5 Gains and Losses and Net Change............................................................................... 21
Table 2.6 Land Transformation .................................................................................................... 22
Table 3.1 A Tabular Representation of the Literature for Automated Delineation Methods
of Debris Covered Glaciers .......................................................................................... 36
Table 3.2 Parameters of the Applied V–A Relations. Cogely (2011) Used the Same
Relationships for the Glacier Volume Estimations of the Same Region. Volumes
Are Calculated in m3 for Input Glacier Areas Measured in m3. c is in m3-2γ; γ is
Dimensionless ..............................................................................................................40
Table 4.1 Basic Information on Demography and Climate of the Cities ..................................... 53
Table 4.2 Details and Characteristics of the Satellite Data Used ................................................ 54
Table 4.3 List of Landsat Datasets Used for LULC Classification .............................................. 55
Table 5.1 A Brief Description of the Review Studies on Various Land Change Models by
Different Authors ......................................................................................................... 74
Table 5.2 Description of Broad Characteristics (Defined by Verburg et al., 2006) to
Classify Different Land Change Models ..................................................................... 76
Table 5.3 Description of the Land Use and Land Cover Classes Identified in the Study
Area, Mentioning the Different Features ..................................................................... 82
Table 5.4 Area (in km2) Covered by Different Land Use and Land Cover Classes in
Lucknow District over the Period of 2000–2031 ......................................................... 83
Table 6.1 Training and Testing Pixels Used in the Classification ................................................ 91
Table 6.2 Number of Correctly and Incorrectly Classified Pixels for the Two Algorithms ........96
Table 6.3 Separability Analysis between Diverse Crop and Noncrop Classes Using the TD
Method .........................................................................................................................97
Table 6.4 Separability Analysis between Diverse Crop and Noncrop Classes Using the JM
Distance Method .......................................................................................................... 98
Table 6.5 Selected Measures (SVMs with Linear Kernel) ..........................................................99
Table 6.6 Selected Measures (SVMs with Polynomial Kernel) ...................................................99
Table 6.7 Selected Measures (SVMs with Radial Basis Kernel) ............................................... 100
xiii
xiv List of Tables
Table 6.8 Selected Measures (SVMs with Sigmoid Kernel) .................................................... 100
Table 6.9 Selected Measures (ANN Classification) ................................................................. 102
Table 6.10 Selected Measures (RF Classification) ..................................................................... 103
Table 6.11 Classification Algorithms OA, κ Results before and after Postprocessing Steps .... 104
Table 6.12 Statistical Significance in the Accuracy between Two Different Algorithms by
Z-Test ........................................................................................................................ 104
Table 7.1 Brief Description of the Spatial Metrics Used in the Study ..................................... 113
Table 7.2 Description of the Land Use/Land Cover Classes Identified in the Study Area,
Mentioning the Different Features ........................................................................... 116
Table 7.3 Area (in km2) Covered by Different Land Use/Land Cover Classes in Lucknow
District over the Period of 2000–2017 ..................................................................... 117
Table 7.4 Change Detection in Area (km2) between Land Use/Land Cover Classes from
2000 to 2017 ............................................................................................................. 118
Table 8.1 Brief Details of the Study Area ................................................................................ 124
Table 8.2 Details of the Satellite Data Used for the Present Study ......................................... 125
Table 8.3 Scaling Parameters Used in Equations 8.5 and 8.6 ................................................. 126
Table 8.4 Area Change and Surface Area of Glaciers/Glacierets in 1993 and 2015 ............... 127
Table 8.5 Volume Change of Glaciers and Glacierets between 1993 and 2015 in Stok
and Matoo Catchment .............................................................................................. 128
Table 9.1 Morphometric and Morphotectonic Parameters and Their Equation ...................... 135
Table 9.2 Stream Number in Given Order ............................................................................... 138
Table 9.3 Stream Length in Given Order ................................................................................. 139
Table 9.4 HI for Eight Watersheds and Their Classes ............................................................. 141
Table 9.5 Sl Value for Eight Watersheds and Their Classes .................................................... 142
Table 9.6 Basin Asymmetry (Af) Value for Eight Watersheds and Their Classes ............... 144
Table 9.7 Schumm (1956) Classification of Elongation Ratio .................................................. 144
Table 9.8 Elongation Ratio (Re) of Eight Watersheds and Their Classes ................................. 144
Table 9.9 River Sinuosity (K) Value in Given Order for All Watersheds ............................... 145
Table 10.1 Climatological Data over Ghaziabad........................................................................ 158
Table 10.2 Fog Statistics over IGP ............................................................................................. 158
Table 10.3 Mann–Kendall Trend Statistics................................................................................ 161
Table 10.4 Kendall’s Tau Correlation and Sen’s Slope Magnitude ............................................ 163
Table 10.5 Change in Fog Frequency by Decade ...................................................................... 165
Table 10.6 ARIMA Model Fit Statistics .................................................................................... 168
Table 10.7 Relationship with AOD 550 nm ............................................................................... 170
List of Tables xv
Table 11.1 Detail Remote Sensing (RS) Data Description ........................................................ 176
Table 11.2 Quantified Surfaces Parameter Value over Lysimeter Point .................................... 183
Table 11.3 Land Surface Heat, Heat Fluxes, and Daily ET over Lysimeter Point..................... 185
Table 11.4 Comparison of ET (from Wheat Crop) from SEBAL with Lysimeter ..................... 185
Table 12.1 Major Land Use Classes in the Basins of Killinochi ............................................... 196
Table 12.2 Extinction Depth Estimates Based on Land Use Classes ........................................ 198
Table 12.3 Evapotranspiration Rate Estimated Based on the Data from WRB
(mm/Month; Killinochi Basin) ................................................................................200
Table 12.4 Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Values of the Various Soil Groups ................... 201
Table 13.1 Soil Physical Characteristics of 0–60 cm Soil Depth at the Experimental Area.....209
Table 13.2 Description of Data Sets........................................................................................... 210
Table 13.3 Calibrated Genetic Coefficients for Different Varieties of Rice .............................. 210
Table 13.4 Excess and Deficit Rainfall Years for the Four Districts of Madhya Pradesh ......... 212
Table 13.5 RMSE of Simulated Yield for Both Genetic Coefficients (GC) .............................. 215
Table 13.6 Genetic Coefficients for Different Sensitivity Experiments..................................... 216
Table 13.7 RMSE of Simulated Yield for All Genetic Coefficients (IR36) Experiments ......... 216
Table 13.8 RMSE and SD of MODIS and Simulated Evapotranspiration: Difference of ET
between MODIS and Simulated Values during Excess and Deficit Years .............. 219
Table 14.1 Description and Statistics of Sensitive Parameters of SWAT Including
Sensitivity Rank and Optimal Parameterization Values .......................................... 229
Table 14.2 Description and Results of Criteria Used for Testing Statistical Performance of
SWAT Model during Calibration ............................................................................. 229
Table 15.1 Data Source .............................................................................................................. 245
Table 15.2 Areas of Land Use/Land Cover Classes ..................................................................246
Table 15.3 Land Use/Land Cover Change: Trend, Rate, and Magnitude .................................. 247
Table 15.4 Change Detection in the Nutrient Concentration with Reference to Reports
Published in 2002, 2012, and 2015 for the Kabar Tal .............................................. 247
Table 15.5 Correlation between Land Use and Nutrient Concentration ....................................248
Table 16.1 Data Used in This Study and Their Sources ............................................................ 256
Table 16.2 End Members Extracted by n-Dimensional Visualizer on PPI Band ...................... 258
Table 16.3 Result of the Spectral Mapping Methods for Corresponding Spectral
Endmember Classes for Equal Weight to the Three Spectral Mapping Methods
(SAM, BE, and SFF) ................................................................................................ 262
Table 16.4 Percentage of Endmember Classes in the Study Area (Equal Proportion in
Weight for SAM, BE, SFF, and Single Range) ........................................................ 265
Table 16.5 Result of the Spectral Mapping Methods with 100% Weight on BE .......................266
xvi List of Tables
N
Location map Map of India
(Satellite image of Kuttanad)
0 4 8
kms
“Do you think that these creatures have any feeling?” said an
inquisitive consumer of oysters to a well known wit. “Feeling!” replied
his friend; “to be sure they have. Did you never hear them crying
about the streets?”