Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2005 - Investigation of A Novel Flat Heat
2005 - Investigation of A Novel Flat Heat
Keywords: Flat Heat Pipe, Heat Transport Capacity, Sintered Mesh, Cooling
Journal of Heat Transfer Copyright © 2005 by ASME FEBRUARY 2005, Vol. 127 Õ 165
Downloaded 06 Jan 2013 to 140.118.195.168. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 2 Schematic of the experimental setup
Downloaded 06 Jan 2013 to 140.118.195.168. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
lowing the procedure described above, allowed the maximum heat through a change in the porosity of the sintered screen mesh
transport capacity to be determined for various operating tempera- which is defined as
tures.
Utilizing an energy balance, the measured heat loss was deter- C Nd w
mined to be less than 6.6% of the input power for all of the tests. ⫽1⫺ (8)
4
The overall experimental uncertainty was determined to be ap-
proximately 0.71°C. where C is the compact coefficient. Using experimental data from
the tests conducted here, it was determined that this value ranged
from 1.05 to 1.33 depending on the sintering conditions and the
configuration of the mesh used. This compares very well with
Analysis
previous results obtained by other investigators.
As described previously 关12兴, the operation of a flat heat pipe is
subject to a number of limitations and the maximum heat transport Boiling Limit. Nucleation within the capillary wick is unde-
capacity at a given operating temperature is determined by the sirable for wicked heat pipe operation since the bubbles can ob-
smallest of these values at the specified operating temperature. For struct the liquid circulation and cause hot spots on the heated wall
high heat flux heat pipes operating in a low to moderate tempera- 关15兴. Though there are always some vapor nuclei or small vapor
ture range, the capillary and boiling limits are typically the domi- domes on the heated wall of wick structure, significant superheat
nant factors that govern the operation of these devices 关4,5兴. The is required essentially for those bubbles to grow. Evaporation heat
calculation of the operational limitations for flat heat pipes of this transfer on the wick layer is different from pool boiling on a
type can be found as follows. surface with and without a porous layer. The evaporation in the
thin wick layer occurs at the liquid–vapor interface and the liquid
Capillary Limit. In order to maintain the continuity of the pressure is affected by the capillary structure of the wick. Bubble
interfacial evaporation, the total pressure drop in the heat pipe formation within the wick layer is dominated by the porous struc-
must be less than or equal to the maximum capillary pumping ture and the superheat between the heated wall and the liquid-
pressure 关12兴. When the overall pressure drop is equal to the cap- phase. As a result, only those bubbles larger than a critical value
illary pumping pressure, the evaporation heat transfer reaches can exist and grow in the superheated liquid. It is very difficult to
maximum value, and accurately estimate the critical bubble size, but a method for ap-
proximating the critical bubble radius, required for bubble forma-
⌬ P total ⫽⌬ P ca p (1) tion and growth can be found in Ref. 关16兴 as
The total pressure drop resulting from the frictional viscous
pressure drop of the liquid and vapor, the pressure drop due to the 2
r b⫽ (9)
phase-change and gravitational body force induced pressure drop P sat 共 T l 兲 exp兵 v l 关 P l ⫺ P sat 共 T l 兲兴 /R g T l 其 ⫺ P l
can be expressed as 关4兴
where the liquid pressure, P l , in the wick layer can be expressed
⌬ P total ⫽⌬ P v ⫹⌬ P l ⫹⌬ P ph,e ⫹⌬ P ph,c ⫹⌬ P g (2) as
The capillary pressure can be estimated by the Young–Laplace P l ⫽ P v ⫺ 共 P ca p ⫹ P d 兲 (10)
equation and expressed as
and
⌬ P ca p ⫽2 cos ␣ 冉 1
r m,e
⫺
1
r m,c 冊 (3)
P ca p ⫽
2
r m,e
(11)
Combining Eq. 共1兲 and Eq. 共3兲 and neglecting the phase-change
pressure drop, the maximum capillary heat transport capacity of Ā
the flat heat pipe can be estimated as 关4兴 P d ⫽⫺ (12)
␦3
Q max⫽ 冉 2 cos ␣
L effr m,e
⫺ l g sin •冊冋 2 共 f Re兲 v v
⫹
l
v D 2h, v A c, v h f g KA c,l l h f g 册 ⫺1
For an ideal gas
be affected by the sintering and other fabrication processes. In the where ␦ s is the average thickness of the wick layer. For a thicker
absence of extensive experimental data, the formula for wrapped homogenous wick layer, this process provides reasonable accu-
screen wicks, which is described in Eq. 共7兲, can be used to esti- racy. It should be noted that the effective thermal conductivity of
mate the permeability by modifying the porosity the wick-fluid layer of the sintered mesh is different from that of
the wrapped screen mesh. The correct value can be best estimated
d w2 3 using the formula for sintered metal fibers presented by Peterson
K⫽ (7)
122共 1⫺ 兲 2 关4兴
Downloaded 06 Jan 2013 to 140.118.195.168. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 5 Modeling results of the effect of the wire diameter on
Fig. 4 Modeling results of the effect of mesh number on the
the maximum heat transport capacities of flat heat pipes
maximum heat transport capacities of flat heat pipes
q e ⫽A c, v h f g 冉 冊
v
2r h,w
0.5
(16)
6.
The modeling results are presented in Fig. 6 for three flat heat
pipes with the screen mesh number of 100, 150, and 200. The
results indicate that there exist an optimum number of layers for
for screen mesh wick surfaces, the hydraulic radius can be esti- each screen mesh structure. In addition, this optimum number of
mated to be one half of the distance between the wires. Other layers of screen 共or thickness兲 is larger for the screen with larger
limits can be estimated as described by Peterson 关4兴. mesh numbers. The highest maximum heat transport capacities are
The maximum heat transfer capacity of the heat pipe can be obtained for the optimum number of layers. The flat heat pipe
determined by evaluating the different limits at various operating with multiple layers of denser mesh wick has a much higher heat
conditions and can be expressed as transport capacity than the one with a lower mesh number wick.
Q max⫽Min兵 Q c,max ,Q b,max ,Q e,max ,Q s,max ,Q v ,max其 (17) Effect of the Orientation. As mentioned previously, the tilt
angle of the heat pipe has a considerable effect on the heat trans-
Results and Discussion port capacity by assisting or suppressing the return of the working
fluid. However, the sensitiveness to the orientation is much differ-
A thorough investigation of the heat transport capacity at vari- ent for various wick structures. Both model the analytical and
ous operating temperatures and the effects of variations in the experimental evaluation of the flat heat pipes were conducted and
design parameters helps us to understand the operation of heat the results are presented in Fig. 7. Results indicated that the maxi-
pipes and allows the design parameters to be optimized. The ana- mum heat transport capacity is reduced by increasing the tilt
lytical and experimental results described above are presented and
compared in this section.
Effect of the Mesh Number. Variations in the mesh number
of the screen have a reverse effect on the capillary pumping pres-
sure and the frictional pressure drop occurring in the liquid phase
in different ways, and as a result, there may exist an optimum
mesh number for a given heat pipe at a specific operating tem-
perature. The analytical results of the effect of variations in the
wick design on the maximum transport capacity is presented in
Fig. 4 for the flat heat pipes developed and evaluated here. The
diameter of the supporting wires was 0.813 mm. The results indi-
cated that for the three screen mesh combinations investigated
here, the maximum heat transport capacity of the heat pipe with a
mesh number of 150 was higher than others in most operating
temperature ranges.
Effect of Wire Diameter. Variations in the diameter of the
wires can change the size of the vapor space, which in turn affects
the heat transport capacity of the flat heat pipe. As presented in Fig. 6 Modeling results of the effect of layers of the wick on
Fig. 5 for the flat heat pipe with 6 layers of 150 screen mesh, the the maximum heat transport capacities of flat heat pipes
Downloaded 06 Jan 2013 to 140.118.195.168. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
Fig. 9 A comparison of the experimental and modeling results
of the Prototype 1 flat heat pipe
Fig. 7 Effect of the tilt angle on the maximum heat transport
capacities of the flat heat pipes
angle, but that this effect is moderate, even for the wicks with
larger mesh numbers. The trends of experimental results are
agreeable with the analytical results. However, the experimental
results both for prototype 1 and 2 were higher than the modeling
results for larger tilt angles. The performance of the sintered mesh
wick is better than the wrapped one because of the better effective
thermal conductivity and smaller cell structure.
Effect of Length. It is apparent that longer heat pipes have
lower heat transport capacities due to the larger frictional pressure
drop. The effects of variations in the length on the heat transfer
are illustrated in Fig. 8 for different mesh numbers. For shorter
heat pipes, the boiling limit is dominant, while the capillary limit
is the major limiting factor for the longer heat pipes. Fig. 10 A comparison of the experimental and modeling re-
sults of the Prototype flat heat pipes
Comparison of Experimental and Modeling Results. As
described in the experimental investigation, two prototypes whose
configurations are summarized in Table 1, were fabricated,
charged, and tested in order to determine the maximum heat trans- Conclusions
port capacity and verify the modeling results. The results of this
comparison are illustrated in Fig. 9 and Fig. 10 for Prototype 1 A novel flat heat pipe has been developed and investigated both
and Prototype 2, respectively. The predicted maximum heat trans- experimentally and analytically. Two prototypes with different
port capacities were in very good agreement with the experimen- wick configurations were evaluated. The results indicated that the
tal results when the compact coefficient of the sintered screen maximum heat transfer capacity of the flat heat pipe was affected
mesh wick was equal to 1.15. The maximum heat transport capac- by the mesh number, wire diameter, number of layers, and tilt
ity of Prototype 1 was 112 W at an operating temperature of 85°C angle, as well as the sintering process utilized, i.e., the compact
and 123 W for Prototype 2. coefficient of the sintered screen mesh wick. Increasing the wire
diameter resulted in an increase in the maximum heat transport
capacity. The mesh number had opposing effects on the capillary
pumping capacity and the frictional pressure drop, such that there
exists a set of optimum design parameters. Similar to the mesh
number, the layer number of the screen mesh also has an opposing
effect on the capillary and boiling heat transfer, with the larger
mesh number having a higher heat transfer capacity with more
layers. The tilt angle had the greatest effect on the maximum heat
transfer capacity and the impact of tilt, decreases with increasing
mesh number. At higher operating temperatures, the boiling limit,
which is related to the physical properties of the porous wick may
be exceeded. The sintering process determined the compact coef-
ficient, which ranged from 1.05 to 1.33, and significantly changed
the properties of the screen mesh, thereby influencing the opti-
mum design for various thermal loads.
The experimental results indicated that the maximum heat
transport capacity and heat flux for Prototype 1, which utilized
four layers of 100 mesh screen and a compact coefficient, of 1.15,
were 112 W and 17.4 W/cm2 , respectively, in a horizontal posi-
Fig. 8 Modeling result of the variation of the maximum heat tion. For Prototype 2, which utilized six layers of 150 mesh screen
flux with the length of the flat heat pipes and a compact coefficient of 1.15, these values were 123 W and
Downloaded 06 Jan 2013 to 140.118.195.168. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm
19.1 W/cm2 , respectively. In both cases, the experimentally ob- Subscripts
tained values compared quite well with those obtained analyti- a ⫽ Adiabatic, air
cally. b ⫽ Boiling
c ⫽ Condensation, capilary
Acknowledgment cap ⫽ Capillary
The authors would like to acknoledge the support of the Na- e ⫽ Evaporation, entrainment
tional Science Foundation through grant CTS-0312848. eff ⫽ Effective
f ⫽ Fluid
Nomenclature g ⫽ Gravity
l ⫽ Liquid phase
Ā ⫽ Constant m ⫽ Meniscus
Ac ⫽ Cross-section area, m2 ph ⫽ Phase-change
a ⫽ Constant s ⫽ Sonic
b ⫽ Constant sat ⫽ Saturated
C ⫽ Compact coefficient v ⫽ Vapor phase
De ⫽ Equivalent diameter, m
Dh ⫽ Hydraulic diameter, m
ds ⫽ Diameter of the supporting wires, m
dw ⫽ Wire diameter of the mesh, m
f ⫽ Frictional coefficient References
g ⫽ Gravity acceleration, m/s2 关1兴 Plesch, D., Bier, W., Seidel, D., and Schubert, K., 1991, ‘‘Miniature Heat Pipes
Hp ⫽ Height of the heat pipe, m for Heat Removal from Microelectronic Circuits,’’ Proceedings of ASME An-
nual Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
hfg ⫽ Latent heat of vaporization, J/kg 关2兴 Hopkins, R., Faghri, A., and Khrustalev, D., 1999, ‘‘Flat Miniature Heat Pipes
K ⫽ Permeability, m2 With Micro Capillary Grooves,’’ ASME J. Heat Transfer, 121, pp. 102–109.
k ⫽ Thermal conductivity, W/m K 关3兴 Peterson, G. P., Duncan, A. B., and Weichold, M. H., 1993, ‘‘Experimental
Investigation of Micro Heat Pipe Fabricated in Silicon Wafers,’’ ASME J. Heat
L ⫽ Length of the heat pipe, m Transfer, 11, pp. 751–756.
N ⫽ Number of the mesh 关4兴 Peterson, G. P., 1994, An Introduction to Heat Pipes—Modeling, Testing, and
P ⫽ Pressure, Pa Applications, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
p ⫽ Perimeter, m 关5兴 Faghri, A., Heat Pipe Science and Technology, Taylor & Francis, PA, 1995, pp.
240–245.
Pd ⫽ Disperse pressure, Pa 关6兴 Wang, Y. X., and Peterson, G. P., 2003, ‘‘Investigation of the Heat Transfer
⌬P ⫽ Pressure drop, Pa Limits in Thin Capillary Wicks of Phase-Change Cooling Devices,’’ The 6th
Q ⫽ Heat load, W ASME–JSME Thermal Engineering Joint Conference, March 16 –20, Kohala,
Qb ⫽ Boiling heat flux, W/m2 Hawaii.
关7兴 Van Ooijen, H., and Hoogendoorn, C. J., 1981, ‘‘Experimental Pressure Pro-
Qc ⫽ Capillary heat flux, W/m2 files Along the Vapor Channel of a Flat-Plate Heat Pipe,’’ Advances in Heat
Qe ⫽ Entrainment heat flux, W/m2 Pipe Technology, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 121–129.
rb ⫽ Radius of vapor bubble, m 关8兴 Mallik, A. K., and Peterson, G. P, 1992, ‘‘On the Use of Micro Heat Pipes As
an Integral Part of Semiconductor Devices Arrays’’ ASME J. Electron.
r cap ⫽ Radius of liquid meniscus, m Packag., 114, pp. 436 – 442.
Sw ⫽ Space between wires, m 关9兴 Mallik, A. K., and Peterson, G. P., 1995, ‘‘Steady-State Investigation of Vapor
T ⫽ Temperature, K Deposited Micro Heat Pipe Arrays,’’ ASME J. Electron. Packag., 117, pp.
Tl ⫽ Liquid-phase temperature, K 75– 87.
关10兴 Peterson, G. P., Duncan, A. B., and Weichold, M. H., 1993, ‘‘Experimental
T lv ⫽ Liquid-vapor interface temperature, K Investigation of Micro Heat Pipe Fabricated in Silicon Wafers,’’ ASME J. Heat
Tv ⫽ Vapor-phase temperature, K Transfer, 11, pp. 751–756.
T o pe ⫽ Operating temperature, K 关11兴 Wang, Y. X., and Peterson, G. P., 2002, ‘‘Investigation of Wire-Bonded Micro
tw ⫽ Thickness of the wall, m Heat Pipes,’’ AIAA J., 16, pp. 346 –355.
关12兴 Wang, Y. X., and Peterson, G. P., 2003, ‘‘Flat Heat Pipe Cooling Devices for
W ⫽ Width of the heat pipe, m Laptopo/Mobile Computers,’’ ASME INTERPACK03 Int’l Electronic Packag-
Greek Alphabet ing Conf. and Expo., July 6 –11, Maui, Hawaii.
关13兴 Bejan, A., 1985, Convection Heat Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp.
␣ ⫽ Contact angle, degree 77– 82.
␦ ⫽ Thickness of the film on the porous surface, m 关14兴 Shah, R. K., and Bhatti, M. S., 1987, ‘‘Laminar Convective Heat Transfer in
Ducts,’’ Handbook of Single-Phase Convective Heat Transfer, Wiley, New
␦s ⫽ Thickness of the screen wick, m York, pp. 3.45–3.70.
⫽ Porosity, % 关15兴 Wang, Y. X., and Peterson, G. P., 2002, ‘‘Investigation of htin Film Evapora-
⫽ Tilt angle, degree tion Limit in Single Screen Mesh Layer,’’ Proceedings of the 2002 ASME Int’l
⫽ Viscosity, N ⫺5 /m 2 Mechanical Enr. Conf. and Expo., November 17–22, New Orleans, LA.
关16兴 Cary V. P., 1992, Liquid–Vapor Phase-Change Phenomena: An Introduction to
⫽ Density, kg/m3 the Thermophysics of Vaporization and Condensation Process in Heat Transfer
⫽ Surface tension, N/m Equipment, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, p. 140.
Downloaded 06 Jan 2013 to 140.118.195.168. Redistribution subject to ASME license or copyright; see http://www.asme.org/terms/Terms_Use.cfm