Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How HRBPs and Manage 777448 NDX
How HRBPs and Manage 777448 NDX
Underperforming employees negatively impact not only their manager but also their
teams. The employee, for example, produces poor-quality outputs that require rework by
others, distracts colleagues with excessive demands for support or fails to contribute to
others’ performance with ideas and skills. In addition, the failure to manage
underperformance can cause disengagement on teams whose members become
frustrated with underperformers or dissatisfied with management support.
HRBPs should support managers throughout the entire process of addressing employee
underperformance:
Based on this assessment, HRBPs should help managers plot the observable behaviors to
understand if they have correctly identified underperformance and its severity (see Figure
1).
Source: Gartner
■ Transition to Another Role — Use this option for employees who are a good fit for
the organization but whose skills are not aligned with their current role.
HRBPs may also have to supplement existing guidance for managers with new solutions
if the root cause exercise reveals an issue not addressed by the current guidance. For
example, only 29% of organizations provide managers with guidance on what strategies
to share with underperforming employees for more effectively working from home or in a
hybrid environment. 1 At organizations with a large remote or hybrid workforce, some
workflows may create unnecessary friction that impedes the employee’s performance.
At the end of the PIP time period, HRBPs should schedule a meeting with the employee
and manager to evaluate whether or not the goals of the PIP have been met successfully.
■ If the employee has not met the goals established in the PIP, the manager should
follow the guidelines for consequences laid out in the PIP, except for extenuating
circumstances. If there is some reasonable justification for not having met the goals,
this should be handled either on a case-by-case basis or according to company
policy.
■ If the employee meets the goals every week, then after the PIP timeline has ended,
the manager and employee should discuss which elements of the PIP, if any, might
be helpful to continue. Then schedule one final check-in a few weeks later to make
sure the employee hasn’t relapsed into poor performance. Managers should reinforce
positive behaviors across teams to sustain performance improvements over time.
2
2022 Gartner Q2 CHRO Survey; n = 109 CHROs. The 2022 Gartner Q2 CHRO Survey was
conducted to understand current performance management priorities and career pathing
strategies of leading organizations around the world. The research was conducted online
from 27 June 2022 to 29 July 2022, and had 109 HR leaders as respondents, with
representation from various industries across 18 countries. The survey was designed and
developed by Gartner’s HR Practice research team.
3
2021 HRBP Performance Management Benchmarking Survey; n = 74 HRBPs. The 2021
Gartner Performance Management Benchmarking Survey for HRBPs was conducted
online from 4 May 2021 through 7 June 2021, and contains responses from more than 54
HRBPs across 15 countries and 18 industries. The survey design and development,
administration and data analysis was done by Gartner’s HR Practice Research Team.
Problem/Example “I wanted to discuss your project management skills. Your last two
deliverables were a week late and you didn’t let me or your teammates know
about possible timeline extensions beforehand.”
Impact “The slow turnaround of the deliverables caused one of your teammates to
work beyond office hours twice last week. Repeated actions like this can hurt
your professional reputation and detract from the good quality of your work.”
Contribution “I think the main problem here is a lack of effective communication and focus.
What do you think is contributing to your actions? Is it your co-workers, a lack
of resources or the work environment?”
Invitation “I’d love to hear your perspective and discuss next steps.”
Source: Gartner