Name Carlos Ernesto Martínez Rodríguez

University Universidad Virtual del Estado de Guanajuato

Student ID
2201754
Date
April 30, 2024

Module’s Name Passive voice.

Teacher’s Name Gergana Neycheva Petrova

1 My participation in the forum

Hello classmates, my name is Carlos Ernesto Martinez Rodriguez, and I am 34 years old, in my opinion
I am in favor of euthanasia, I will give you my reasons on the following paragraphs.
Euthanasia, as defined, involves the deliberate act of ending a person's life to relieve suffering, typically
associated with terminal illness or unbearable pain. Various methods for euthanasia exist, including
administering lethal doses of medication or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. Regulation of
euthanasia can offer safeguards to ensure it is conducted ethically and with due consideration for patient
autonomy and well-being. In the case of Mexico, the official position on euthanasia remains largely
prohibitive, with laws explicitly banning the practice except in certain limited circumstances.
Euthanasia is deemed by many as a compassionate option in dire circumstances, where individuals face
relentless suffering and diminished quality of life. Firstly, it is argued that euthanasia affords individuals
the right to a dignified death, allowing them to maintain autonomy over their own bodies and end their
suffering on their own terms. Furthermore, proponents suggest that legalizing euthanasia could alleviate
the burden on families and healthcare systems by providing a humane alternative to prolonged suffering
and costly end-of-life care.
In conclusion, while acknowledging the complexity of the issue, the arguments for euthanasia
underscore the importance of respecting individual autonomy and relieving unnecessary suffering.
Thank you for your attention and I will be waiting for your comments.
The arguments that I use for expressing my opinion could be find on:

Brock, D. W. (1992). Voluntary active euthanasia. The Hastings Center Report, 22(2), 10-22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11017-019-
09494-0
Gastmans, C. (2019). A critical analysis of the arguments for euthanasia. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 40(3), 229-249.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307/3563561

2 Feedbacks for my classmates

Feedback 1 for Jose Leonardo Garcia Fernandez:

Leonardo, thank you for sharing your perspective on euthanasia. Your differentiation between passive
and active euthanasia highlights an important distinction in end-of-life care.

I appreciate your consideration of exceptions, particularly regarding individuals in a vegetative state.

However, I wonder if there might be cases where the line between physical and psychological suffering
blurs. For instance, some mental illnesses can cause profound and unremitting anguish that may be just
as unbearable as physical pain. How would you navigate such complexities in determining eligibility for
euthanasia?

Additionally, your point about religious considerations is valid. It's crucial to ensure that public policy
reflects the diversity of beliefs in society. However, could there be other ethical or social factors beyond
religious beliefs that should inform our approach to euthanasia legislation?

Overall, your perspective adds depth to the discussion, emphasizing the importance of respecting
individual autonomy while also recognizing the complexities inherent in end-of-life decisions. Thank
you for contributing to this dialogue.

Feedback 2 for Luis Daniel Razo Gonzalez:

Daniel, thank you for sharing your perspective on euthanasia and emphasizing the importance of
respecting individual autonomy and free will.

Your argument underscores the fundamental principle of self-determination, highlighting the

significance of allowing individuals to make decisions about their own lives, including the option to end
it if they so choose. It's commendable that you recognize the profound suffering that individuals may
endure, both internally and in their interactions with their environment.

However, I'm curious about how we can ensure that individuals making such decisions are fully
informed and free from external pressures or influences. For example, in cases where someone is
experiencing intense emotional distress or mental illness, how can we distinguish between a genuine
desire for euthanasia and temporary despair that might be alleviated with appropriate support and
treatment?
Moreover, while individual autonomy is crucial, how do we balance this with the potential impact of
euthanasia on broader societal values and perceptions of the sanctity of life? Do you believe there should
be any limitations or regulations on euthanasia to address these concerns?

Your viewpoint adds depth to the conversation by emphasizing the importance of empathy and
understanding in approaching the sensitive issue of euthanasia. Thank you for sharing your perspective.

Feedback 3 for Marco Antonio Obrajero Reyes:

Marco Antonio, thank you for sharing your perspective on euthanasia and emphasizing the importance
of cherishing the time we have with loved ones.

Your acknowledgment of the desire to minimize suffering and maintain dignity in death resonates with
many who advocate for euthanasia as an option for those facing terminal illnesses. Additionally, your
recognition of individual freedom and autonomy in making end-of-life decisions is crucial in this
discussion.

However, your point about choosing to enjoy one's last days with loved ones raises an important
counterargument to euthanasia. It prompts us to consider the value of quality time spent with family and
friends, regardless of the circumstances. Yet, it's essential to recognize that not everyone has the same
support networks or opportunities for such meaningful experiences. For some individuals facing
excruciating pain or loss of autonomy, the option of euthanasia may represent a merciful release from
prolonged suffering.

Moreover, while your perspective highlights the significance of embracing life's moments, it's important
to remember that each person's experience of illness and suffering is unique. Some may find comfort
and closure in spending their final days surrounded by loved ones, while others may feel that their
suffering has become unbearable and wish to end it.

In conclusion, your viewpoint adds depth to the conversation by reminding us of the value of human
connection and the importance of living life to the fullest. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us.