Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Furanic Compounds in Dielectric Liquid Samples Review and Update
Furanic Compounds in Dielectric Liquid Samples Review and Update
- 921 -
than these results indicate. A possible answer can be
2-furaldehyde (2FAL) found in the work done by Grift%& Lewand, and
5-methyl-2-furaldehyde(5M2F) Pahlavanpour [IO] who determined that ZFOL is the
5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde (5H2F) most susceptible of the furanic compounds to further
2-acetyl furan (2ACF) degradation and decomposition. The conclusion
2-furfurylalcohol (2FOL) drawn in our interpretations of furanic results is that the
ZFOL does form more frequently than the population
Laboratory experimentation and field experience with study would indicate. However, a disproportionately
furanic compounds in transformers has shown that all larger hction of those results change, eliminating the
of these compounds except ZFAL are not very stable 2FOL, prior to the analysis of in-service oil samples for
under operating conditions found in transformers [9,10]. tiuanic compounds.
These compounds apparently form- and then further
degrade to 2FAL over a time span of a’few months. The fmt key point of interpreting furan analysis is
2FAL is apparently stable for several years under the easily stated
same conditions.
y a profile of furanic compounds in dielectric
INTERPRETING FURAN RESULTS: liquid samples indicates the presence offiranic
compounds other than 2-furaldehyde, this is a
Furan analysis can be performed on all dielectric strong indication that the condition causing
liquids used as insulating media in. power transformers. these furanic compounds to be generated is an
In as yet unpublished work, S . D.Myers, Inc. has found -
active condition.
the following distribution of the five furanic
compounds in several years worth of furan data: In other words, paper in the transformer was degrading
or ageing abnormally at the time the sample was drawn,
Table 1 or it had been degrading or ageing abnormally within a
Relative Abundance of Five Fu+c Compounds few months earlier, at most.
- 922.-
The paper will examine both of these questions. The % Life by Mean DP was calculated using the average
answer to the first depends to a large extent to the measured DP..(Table 4 includes the values from
answer for the second, so the second question will be different sectiok of the transformers that go into this
exanuned first. calculation), compared to an initial value of 1200 and
n 200. For example: . .
end oflife d e f ~ t i o of ..
QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF FURAN
ANALYSIS RESULTS . (1) Calculation of % Life Used by DP
There have been two general, quantitative methods % Life Used = {( 1200 - 263)/1000] X 100 = 93.7%
used to interpret furan results in terms of remaining life
of the solid insulation. In one method, results are Table 4
compared to all results from a population of operating Summary of DP Measurements
equipment using a .statistical. model to assign a
percentile score [6]. In a number of variations on the &
&
l.g ' -
Unit1 -
unit2 -
unit3
other method, either the 2-furaldehyde content or the
Winding A Top 220 254 38 1
total content of furanic compounds is used to calculate
Winding A Middle .290 351 404
a predicted degree of polymerization. Sbkolnik,
Winding A Bottom ' 321 291 , 407.
Bilgin, and Kelly [ 1 I] summarized some of these DP
Winding B Top 243 429 464
calculation methods and provided a bibliography of
Winding B Middle 306 445 45 1
papers for m e r study.
WindingBBottom 282 ' 390 Missing
WindingCTop ' 210 348 ~'401
Percentile Score Approach:
Winding C Middle 258 : 302 405
WindingCBottom ~ 234 . . 363 460
The percentile approach is very simple. In this
method, as large a database population of similar . Average '1 263 353. 422
transformers a s possible is assembled and the
population values for total furanic compounds are In the example above, the % Life Used was overstated
charted. A total furanic compounds result can then be by furanic compounds analysis compared to DP
plotted against this distribution, and it is possible to measurement by 1.4%, 7.8%. and 3.1%, respectively.
calculate the percentage of the overall population of This was fairly typical. It was also acceptable to be
similar units in the database that fall both below and biased in this.direction, as the difference was almost
above this value. For several years, S. D. Myers, Inc. always conservative. By overstating life used in this
used this method with significantsuccess. fashion, interpretations were biased toward preventing
unplanned or unscheduled outages.
At the time that this method was being pursued, S ; D. .. ;
Myers, Inc. had the opportunity on several occasions to A linear relationship for DP versus remaining life,
compare values for Percent Life Used, figured as above, based on initial DP of ,1200 is not completely
to an average of measured DP. This was possible to appropriate, even though this is still widely used. A
achieve by measuring h a n i c compounds content .of further investigation of~themethod almindicates it was
in-service transformer that were soon thereafter brought much more severely biased than initially believed. It
into the S . D. Myers, Inc. facility for either disposal or is no longer considered to be a valid method of using
repaidremanufacture. The following table lists some furanic compounds results to assess .insulation ageing.
fairly typical values: The most charitable comment about the method is that
it did lead certain researchers to continue pursuing a
Table 3 correlation of furanic compounds content to remaining
Comparison of Actuarial Life Remaining life when the methods of calculating DP from furans
to Life Remaining Calculated by DP became controversial. . .
'
. .
w -
Unit 3 Predicting DP Approach:
Mean DP 263 353 422
. . , ,
. , Researchers developed equations to relate furan
% Life
concentrationh oil with degree of polymerization for
Usedby ' 93.7% ' 84.7% ' 77.8%
the paper in transformers [11,12,13]. Initially, such
Mean DP
determinations provided good apparent correlation of
F u r a n s ~ ~ b 854
' 491 ' l,23
DP to either total furan content pr content of 2FAL.
% Life
Data points were obtained by analyzing oil samples for
Used by 95.1% 92.5% 80.9% furanic compounds testing then obtaining paper
Furan~ob .
samples. from either a field inspection or tear down of
the transformer from-which the oil had been drawn.
- 923
As more data were obtained, the direct correlations not manufactured using thermally upgraded paper.
upon which these calculations were based were found
in many cases to be less than completely reliable [ 131. Predicting DP for Two Transformer Pooulations:
This work [14] and subsequent work by the same
Effect of Thermallv UDeraded Paper: During the researchers [I I] allowed them to derive a preliminary
industry discussion that arose as more data were model for predicting DP from furanic compounds
gathered concerning whether furanic compounds content, separating the two populations of transformers
analysis was huly useful to predict DP and remaining based on whether thermally upgraded paper had been
life, the position of the S.D. Myers, Inc. laboratory was used in manufacture of the equipment. They found
that there had to be a reasonable correlation. In that a model and an equation from a prior study [I51
investigating the situation, the S . D. Myers, Inc. was the most reasonable approximation for DP in
laboratory determined that transformers from which the transformers without thermally upgraded paper based
statistical database results had been drawn differed on the level of furanic compounds that were found in
from the early furanic compounds to DP calculation operating transformers. A number of laboratories use
studies. Further, transformers contributing ,additional this technique and refer to it as the "Chendong
data points to the evolving studies of DP and furan Equation".
compounds differed from the transformers from which
the earliest data points were drawn. While apparently adequate for transformers without
thermally upgraded paper, correlation is not good when
Most of the transformers in the actuarial database were the Chendong equation is applied to data from
manufactured in North-America, subsequent to 1960, transformers with thermally upgraded paper. The
and were 65 degree C rise units. This turned out to be other model, developed specifically for transformers
an important criterion for interpreting furan results 1141. with thermally upgraded paper, also was based on
A review of the earlier studies to arrive at a calculated 2FAL when published [I I]. Unpublished studies
or predicted DP reveals that most transformers since have updated this model. The revision is
contributing data to those studies were largely units published here for the fust time,although it has been
manufactured outside'of North America. Further, data distributed to individuals and standards organizations
that seemingly called the earlier studies into question for verification and comment.
appeared to arise from a mixture of post-1960
transformers with units manufactured earlier in North Revision of the DP Calculation Model:
America and with'units manufactured outside of North
America. . . Although the initial model was based on ZFAL,
.. subsequent work indicates a better correlation is
While it is not a f m rule, most 65. degree C rise obtained if the total furanic compounds content is used
transformers manufactured in North America since to predict degree of polymerization.
approximately 1960 used'thermally upgraded paper in
their solid insulation system Commonly, thermal The equation and prediction techniques in this paper
upgrading of the paper was accomplished by are based on furanic compounds conient expressed as
impregnating the paper with dicyandiamide (dicy). p a r 0 per billion by weight (pgkg). The equations
must be modified io address parts per billion, weight io
Bilgin, Sbkohuk, and Kelly [I41 compared fi" volume (&L), or other units.
formation from ageing of thermally upgraded paper and
paper that had not been thermally upgraded. They The revised equation becomes:
also examined the stability of furanic compounds in oil
spiked with dicyandiamide.: Finally, a review of (2) Predicted DP from Total Furanic Compounds for
furanic compounds concentrations in-two populations Transformers with Thermally Upgraded Paper
was undertaken. One population was primarily
'
transformers that were manufactured with thermally DP = [loglo(total furans) - 4.03551 I-0.002908
upgraded paper. The other was transformers without:
thermally upgraded paper. A modification of the Chendong equation for
.. transformers without thermally upgraded paper, using
The conclusions were: (1) that thermally upgraded 2FAL.content in ppb by weight (pgkg) becomes:
paper generated substantially lower furanic compounds
concentrations, (2) that furanic compounds (3) Predicted DP from 2FAL Content for Transformers
demonstrated .lower stability in insulating liquids without Thermally Upgraded Paper
spiked with dicyandiamide, and (3) that the population
studies confirmed the 'conclusions of the laboratory DP = [loglo(2FAL X 0.88) - 4.511 / -0.0035
work. Furanic .compounds, on average, were
substantially higher in operating transformers that were
- 924
Finally, as mentioned earlier, use of a linear insulation. Unless the transformer is nearly brand new,
relationship between life remaining or life used and DP, there is no reason to expect that there is any sort of
with a “beginning of life” value for DP of 1200 is not active condition generating additional furans.. Only
completely appropriate. New paper before being normal monitoring and testing to establish a trend of
installed in a transformer typically has a degree of results would be recommended. For most equipment,
polymerization of 1200 to 1400. After factory drying this would mean annual retesting of the furan content.
and assembly, our experience is that .new paper in a
new transformer has a DP of 800 to 1200, and It is At 250 ppb,’DP has declined substantially. It is
usually more appropriate to figure life assessment important to determine whether an active condition
based on changes from the lower limit of this range. exists that’is prematurely ageing the solid insulation. A
shorter retesting interval ivindicated, and the actual age
Simply substitutingthe value for starting DP of 800 for of the equipment, size of the unit,and critical nature of
1200 in the linear equation above (Equation I) is not an the application are all factors that must be considered.
adequate method for determining life used or life In most cases, a retest interCal of three months to six
remaining. A more appropriate method is to calculate months would be appropriate for a fust test yielding
the predicted DP for the transformer using the more this !&d of result.
appropriate of the two equations above (Equation 2 and
Equation 3) and then to use the following to estimate % It is beyond the scope.of this paper to review all the
Life Used [16]. possibilities and intelpretations for furanic compounds
results. As a brief summary of some of the important
(4) % Life Used from DP points to consider: , .
,
% Life Used = [log,, (DP) - 2.9031 I-0.006021 I . The total level of furans is considered:
2. The presence of compounds other tban ZEAL is
The initial ageing rate of paper, relative to a decrease in given greater weight.
DP, is more rapid in the early stages. The first third 3. Trends in &ta are more important than the
of transformer paper’s effective life shows a decrease absolute value of the €uranic compounds results.
in DP from a starting point of 800 to 504 - a decline in. This is the only real way to identify whether, .
a
DP of 296. The fmal third of the paper’s life profile truly indicates an actiye condition.
experiences only a decline from 317 to an end-point of 4. The age, nmiufacture, and,insulation class of the
200 - a decline of only 117. , . . . transformer must be considered.
. .
5. Size of the ;lit, application type, and critical
From this calculation, many laboratories express the nature of thk application help to determine the
furan and calculated DP in term of Life Used. . appropriate .interval for retesting.
6. Other testing such as dissolved gas analysis and
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION : moisture analysis is extremkly useful in properly
. . interpreting €uranic compounds results.
Interpreting Fnranic Compounds Results: 7. Oil maintenance will decrease the furancontent
and this mu$ be taken @to account -for life
Loss of life can then be taken &to consideration when assessment.
making interpretations of furanic compounds test data.
Consider two sets of such data, as fust samples from There are several valuable uses for these data and these
operating equipment. Both are all ZFAL, and the interpretations. Some of these are:
results are 100 ppb and 250 ppb, respectively.
Applying Equation 2, Equation 3, and Equation 4 to Active overheating and ageing of the solid
these data yields the following calculated results: insulation reduces, equipment life., Proper
maintenance and changes in operating conditions
Table 4 can be instituted to extend equipment life and
Some Calculated DP and Life Used Results maximize the use of valuable assets.
Life assessment using furanic conipounds data
with Thermally without Thermally can be used to prioritize equipment for removal
Upgraded Paper Upgraded Paper and replacement. -An example is that furanic
m -
DP %Life Dp % Life compounds data have been obtained for a number
-
Used used of Askarel filled transfohrs in an industrial
9.6% . 786 1.3% plant. The relative age of the equipment as
lOOppb 700
250ppb 563 25.3% 686 11.1% determined by these results was used to determine
how &y and which units would be replaced
At 100 ppb, minimal damage has been done to the solid over the course of a “Iti-ye% budgeted project.
Furanic compounds results can be used as a
- 925 -
consideration in ‘a .preventative maintenance provide information on the progress of these projects.
program.. -Very high furanic compound results
may indicate -&at preventative oil maintenance is REFERENCES:
not a cost effective option. Replacement or
remanufacture may be a better solution. [l] M. Homing, J. Kelly, S. Myers; “Transformer
4, .An estimate of ageing gives an approximation Maintenance Guide”; Transformer Maintenance
concerning replacement of the equipment. For Institute, Div. S. D.Myers, Inc.; 2001.
example, a: ten year !old transformer thst bas [2] S. D. Myers, J. J. Kelly, R. H. Parrish; “A Guide to
thermally upgraded paper with 745 ppb of total Transformer Maintenance”; Transformer Maintenance
furans is approximately halfway ~througb its Institute, Div. S. D. Myers, Inc.; 1981.
expected life. The owner may tentativelyplan to [3] ASTM International, Committee D9; “D4243
.replace it in approximately another ten years. Standard Method for Measurement of Average
Viscometric Degree of Polymerization of New and
As an aid in interpreting furanic compounds results, the Aged Electrical Papers and Boards”, 1999.
following table is provided (ppb by weight, pgkg):’ [4] IEEE; “Standard C57.91 Guide for Loading
Mineral Oil Immersed Transformers”; 1995. . .
Table 5 [5] D. P. Myers, J. R. Sans; “Field Studies of Furan
Calculated DP and Life Used for a Range of Furanic Formation in Transformer Liquids”, 59’ International
-Compounds Results Cod. OfDoble Clients; 1992.
[6] J. R. Sans, K. M. Bilgin, J. J. Kelly; “Large Scale
Without With Survey of Furanic Compounds in Operating
Thermally Thermally Transformers”; 1998 IEEE International Symposium
Upgraded Upgraded ’ ..
’ . , on Electrical Insulation; 1998.
Paper Paper .’ ’ I . 4 . ’. [7] ASTM International, Committee D27; “D5837
ZFAL Total ‘Calculated . %Life Standard Test Method for Furanic Compounds in
!a&-! !?I& Dp &.& Electrical Insulating Liquids by High-Performance
Liquid Chromatography (HPLC); 1999.
58 si 800 ’. . ,o [8] International EIecbotecbnical Commission;
130 * - 100 ,700 . . 10
“International Standard IEC 61 198,. Mineral Oils -
’
926 -