Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit Iii
Unit Iii
FRS implementation process is broken down into the following three phases.
This phase is the most important. Firstly, the company clarifies an objective of IFRS
adoption, builds a project team and develops a working environment to promote the IFRS
implementation on a company-wide basis.
Secondly, we understand not only the impact on accounting and but also the impact on
business process, information system and the necessity of change in business management
system. We recognize issues for IFRS adoption and clarify IFRS implementation policy and
develop a work plan..
2) Implementation phase
This is a main phase and it requires tough tasks consuming much time. The company makes
solution for the issues that have been recognized and creates new rules and systems for IFRS
adoption. As for accounting, the company understands differences between IFRS and
Japanese accounting standards, and then considers accounting treatment for the differences,
develop group accounting policies, reviews a scope of consolidation, unifies an accounting
period in group companies, and designates a collection method of IFRS disclosure
information.
In parallel with IFRS implementation, the company modifies business process and
information system, and considers new management system. After finalizing to prepare group
accounting policies and to define new business process and information system, the company
conducts trainings for staff about practical implication of IFRS adoption..
In this phase the company adopts new accounting policies and procedures that have been
developed and commence operations under new business process and information system,
and then prepares financial statements based on IFRS..
1
Characteristic # 1. Simplicity:
The language shall be as simple as possible so that a report is easily understandable. Jargons
and technical words should be avoided. Even in a technical report there shall be restricted use
of technical terms if it has to be presented to laymen.
Characteristic # 2. Clarity:
The language shall be lucid and straight, clearly expressing what is intended to be expressed.
For that the report has to be written in correct form and following correct steps.
Characteristic # 3. Brevity:
A report shall not be unnecessarily long so that the patience of the reader is not lost and there
is no confusion of ideas. But, at the same time, a report must be complete. A report is not an
essay.
Characteristic # 4. Positivity:
As far as possible positive statements should be made instead of negative ones. For example,
it is better to say what should be done and not what should not be done.
Characteristic # 5. Punctuation:
Punctuations have to be carefully and correctly used otherwise the meaning of sentences may
be misunderstood or misrepresented.
Characteristic # 6. Approach:
There are two types of approaches: (a) Person—When a report is written based on personal
enquiry or observations, the approach shall be personal and the sentences shall be in the first
person and in direct speech, (b) Impersonal—When a report is prepared as a source of
information and when it is merely factual (e.g. a report on a meeting), the approach shall be
impersonal and the sentences shall be in the third person and in indirect speech.
Characteristic # 7. Readability:
The keynote of a report is readability. The style of presentation and the diction (use of words)
shall be such that the readers find it attractive and he is compelled to read the report from the
beginning to the end.’ Then only a report serves its purpose. A report on the same subject
matter can be written differently for different classes of readers.
2
Characteristic # 8. Accuracy:
A report shall be accurate when facts are stated in it. It shall not be biased with personal
feelings of the writer.
The points in a report shall be arranged with a logical sequence, step by step and not in a
haphazard manner. A planning is necessary before a report is prepared.
A report must be in the proper form. Sometimes there are statutory forms to follow.
One of the significant advantages of IFRS compared to GAAP is its focus on investors in the
following ways:
1. The first factor is that IFRS promise more accurate, timely and comprehensive
financial statement information that is relevant to the national standards. And the
information provided by financial statements prepared under IFRS tends to be more
understandable for investors as they can understand the financial statement without
the necessity of other sources which makes investors more informed
2. This also helps new or small investors by making the reporting standards simpler and
better quality as it puts small and new investors in the same position with other
professional investors as it was impossible under the previous reporting standards.
This also helps to reduce the risk for new or small investors while trading as
professional investors can not take advantage due to the simple to understand nature
of financial statements.
3
be able to understand them, thus eliminating the fees of analysts. Therefore, IFRS
reduces the cost for investors.
Based on information mentioned above, it can be assumed that because higher information
quality reduces both the risk to investors from buying and owning shares and the risk to less
informed investors due to wrong selection due to lack of understanding, it should lead to
reduction in firms cost of equity capital.
This on one hand should increase the share prices, and on the other should make new
investments by firms more attractive.
Moreover, the following points mark additional advantages of IFRS compared to GAAP
Recognising the loss immediately is one of the key features of IFRS as it is not only the
benefit for the investors, but also for the lender and other stakeholders within the company.
The increased transparency and loss recognition of IFRS, usually increases the efficiency of
contracting between companies and their management, which also enhances the corporate
governance.
With increased transparency as promised by IFRS, the lenders also benefit from IFRS as it
makes it compulsory for the companies recognize the loss immediately.
This timelier loss recognition of IFRS, triggers the issues as when the companies face
economic losses, it will be known to the stakeholders of other potential investors. Timelier
loss recognition also enables the company review its book values of assets and liabilities,
earnings, equity.
1.3 Comparability
The convergence to IFRS has improved the comparability of financial statements in the EU.
This has been achieved through having the same reporting standard under a single market, the
EU.
4
As all companies, preparing their consolidated financial statements, have been reporting
underone reporting standard have improved the comparability not only for investors, but also
all stakeholders who use the financial statements.
Another reason that has contributed to the overall success of the IFRS adoption has been due
to the transition period, as more than 8000 listed companies in the EU adopted it in the same
year.
However, there has been an argument about the lack of efficiency and comparability of IFRS.
The following is the arguments against the lack of comparability and consistency of IFRS:
Due to the strong national identity of IFRS reports, as the main effects of IFRS has been on
how companies recognize, measure and disclose items. And the companies have adopted an
approach which minimized the changes from previous national standards which reduced the
ability to compare the financial statements across an industry.
The extensive judgement has been required under IFRS due to the absence of industry related
guidance which created gaps and inconsistencies in the IFRS reporting standards. And this is
another reason for the lack of comparability and inconsistency
And companies are not confident that the IFRS is adequate for the purposes of
communicating their performance to the financial markets, as GAAP reporting standards
tended to be more detailed which could provide more detailed information
Another factor that shows the lack of comparability and inconsistency is because the IFRS
reporting standards are more complicated than the national accounting standards (UK),
therefore, it may become a process of following the complex mechanism but does not
necessarily promote the performance of the companies.
The most mentioned factor about the advantages of IFRS has been the standardization of
financial reporting which eventually improves the comparability of financial statements in
major financial markets. This also removes the trade barrier, as this was one of the key
factors as why the EU has been trying to adopt single reporting standards.
5
1.5 Improved consistency and transparency of financial reporting
This factor can also be mentioned as one of the crucial advantages of converting to IFRS as it
makes the EU member countries to be consistent not only on macroeconomic aspects, but
also on financial reporting which improves relationship between investors and companies
among member countries.
As thousands of companies in Europe and other joining countries across the world has
already created a huge base for IFRS adoption, it also improves the companies to access to
financial markets by having the financial statements prepared under one reporting standards.
One of the main reasons for converting from previously used GAAP to new IFRS was for
improving comparability in international financial markets, thus increasing the focus on
investors. And this has been mainly achieved and still going to be achieved as more and more
countries around the world have been converting to IFRS from their national reporting
standards as mentioned during the interview.
The comparability of financial statements under IFRS will be improved only if the adoption
of IFRS expands including more countries. However, the comparability of financial
statements get worse if the same country uses two different sets of reporting standards, thus
IFRS and national reporting standards.
Due to the gap between the market and book values, the local stock market gets adversely
affected when the IFRS is applied in line with other national reporting standards.
Moreover, there has been no significant achievement in terms of usefulness and improved
comparability of financial statements in the short term which is mainly due to the fact that the
IFRS reporting standards is fairly new as a reporting standard and the harmonization has not
fully been achieved yet by all EU member countries. And it is hoped that the usefulness and
improved comparability of IFRS may be achieved in the medium-long term.
6
In order to assure the comparability of financial statements, all companies should follow the
same rules by adopting IFRS. Private and small and medium sized, unconsolidated statements
can be prepared under IFRS which further improves the comparability and consistency of
financial statements. And eventually, the adoption of IFRS by all countries around the world
gives even more increased usefulness and comparability of financial statements.
1.8 Relevance
And the relevance of the IFRS can be mentioned as a substantial advantage due to the
following reasons:
• The new IFRS reflects on economic substance more than legal form. This helps the
companies and other stakeholders to have true and fair view of the companies’
transactions.
• The way IFRS reflects to gains and losses in a timely manner puts IFRS in a more
reliable and credible position than the GAAP in terms of reporting standards
• The balance sheets prepared under IFRS tends to be more useful due to its layout and
the consistency, and the level of complexity compared to GAAP that tended to be
more detailed
• The manipulation by managers by creating hidden reserves is not allowed any more
under new IFRS, so less manipulative and more shareholders oriented
Moreover, other benefits as mentioned during the interview are cost saving with new IFRS
especially for multinational corporations. However, before companies can start enjoying the
cost savings, they have to spend considerable amount of money as a transitional costs
IFRS 7 was originally issued in August 2005 and applies to annual periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2007.
7
History of IFRS 7
8
5 March 2009 Improving Disclosures about Financial Effective for
Instruments (Amendments to IFRS annual periods
7) issued beginning on or
after 1 January
2009
9
19 November 2013 IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (Hedge Applies when
Accounting and amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS 9 is applied*
IFRS 7 and IAS 39) issued,
implementing additional disclosures
(and consequential amendments)
resulting from the introduction of the
hedge accounting chapter in IFRS 9
10
leaving each standard available for application. Accordingly, these amendments apply when
IFRS 9 is applied.
• fair presentation: as described by the IAS, “fair presentation requires the faithful
representation of the effects of transactions, other events, and conditions as per the
definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income, and expenses set out
in the Framework”;
• materiality and aggregation: material items are items that can influence the
economic decisions of users of financial statements. Material classes of similar items
are presented clustered together, while dissimilar items are presented separately
unless they are immaterial;
11