Achari House

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
W.P. NO. OF 2024

Between:
Vemuluri. Venkatewarlu. ..Petitioner.
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by it's Principle Secratory to Panchayathraj department, and
others…
… .Respondents.
CHECK LIST FOR WRIT PETITION

S.No. Item No. Page No. Checking Officer’s Signature Remarks
1 2 3 4 5
ORIGINAL SET
1) Proof of Service 1
2) Court Fee Rs. /- 2
3) Writ Petition 3
4) Annexures I & II 4
5) Affidavit 5 to
a) Averment regarding previous proceedings
(mention Page No. Para No. )
b) Averment regarding alternative relief
(mention Page No. Para No. )
6) Verification Statement
7) Enclosure
8) Material Papers
(Duly Indexed P.Series) to
9) a) Vakalath Rs. /-
b) Power of Attorney/Resolution Authorising
to sue if petition is filed in rep.capacity
10) Sheet containing Respondents' Addresses
______________________________________________________
DUPLICATE SET
11) Writ Petition 3
12) Annexures I & II 4
13) Affidavit 5 to
14) Material Papers to
_____________________________________________________
MISCELLANEOUS SET
15) Batta Rs.
16) Rule Nisi Forms
17) Covers with Postal Addresses & Ack.Forms
18) Copies of Petition and Affidavits
(As many as the No.of the Respondents + 2)
____________________________________________________
19. WRIT PETITION MISC. PETITION
(Filed for)
Petition
Court Fee Rs.
Batta Rs.
Notice Papers, Covers with Postal Addresses and Ack.Forms
Proforma Draft Interim Order
Signature of the Signature of the Advocate

Scrutiny Officer Name: TATA SINGAIAH GOUD (10679)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Respondent Vakalat filed by for Respt.No.
Counter Filed for Respt.No.
Other Miscellaneous Petitions filed
W.P. No. OF 2024
RUNNING INDEX
Sl. Exh Description of Document Date of Date of filing Page

No. ibit Document of Document No.
1. Service Certificate 12.03.2024 12.03.2023 1

2. Court fee -do- -do- 2
3. Writ Petition -do- -do- 3
4. Annexure -do- -do-
5. Affidavit -do- -do-
6. Verification -do- -do-
Material Papers -do-
7 P.1 House tax receipt along 11.07.2022
with translations
8. P.2 Un official Respondent - -do-
construction photos
9. P.3 Registered WILL deed 14.11.2012 -do-
executed in favor of
petitioner along with
translation .
10. P.4 Representation of the 10.01.2024 -do-
petitioner to the Village 11.02.2024
Secretary along with
translation.
11. Vakalath 12.03.2024 12.03.2024
12. Respondents Addresses -do- -do-
DATE: 12.03.2024
PLACE: Amaravati Counsel for the Petitioner.
SERVICE CERTIFICATE
(PROOF OF SERVICE)
We have served the copies of Writ Petition, Affidavit, Writ Petition Miscellaneous
Petition(s) and Material Papers on the other side Counsel/Government Pleader.
DATE: 12.03.2024
PLACE: Amaravati Counsel for the Petitioner
W.P.NO. OF 2024
BETWEEN:
Vemula Venkateswarlu,
..Petitioner(s)
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by it's Principle Secratory to Panchayathraj

department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secratariat Buildings, Nalapadu Village,
Tulluru Mandal, Guntur District.
..Respondent(s)
COURT FEE
Advocate Welfare Fee : 100.00

(welfare stamp affixed on Vakalath)
Court fee in WP :
Process fee in WP :
Court fee in IA : 10.00
Process fee in IA :
Vakalat –CF : 5.00
C.C.Application : 15.00
Total :
DATE: 12.03.2024
Note: 1.Court Fee : Rs.100/- for each petitioner

2.Process Fee : Rs.30/- for each respondent
MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
(UNDER ART. 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA)
W.P. NO. OF 2024
Between:
Vemuluri Venkateswarlu, S/o. Late Subbaraidu,
Aged about 45 years, occ. carpentor,
R/o. D.No. 77, pathuru, Kaligiri Village
and Mandal, SPSR Nellor District. ..Petitioner.
AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh

rep by it's Principle Secratory to Panchayathraj department,
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Interim Secratariat Buildings,
2. The District Panchayath Raj Officer,

SPSR Nellore District,
Nellore District.
3. The Panchayathi Secretary,

Office of Kaligiri Panchayathi,
Kaligiri Village And Mandal,
SPSR Nellor district.
4. Kondapalli. Padma, W/o Ramanaiah,

2 nd ward, Pathuru, Kaligiri Village,
Kaligiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ..Respondents.
(The address for service on the above named Petitioners is that of their
counsel TATA SINGAIAH GOUD (10679), Advocate, Flat No.105, Maruti Enclave,
Opp: H.P Petrol Bunk,Tadepalli, Guntur Distrct-522501. Mobile: 9441427903. Email:
tatasingaiahgoud@gmail.com)
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore
prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate
writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of

Mandamus declaring the high handed action of 3 rd respondent in
collussion with Respondent No 4 in not considering the represetations
of the petitioner dated 10.01.2024 and 11.02.2024 and allwing the
respondent No 4 to construct her house with out leaving set back as per
rule 20 and also the 3 rd Respondent not taken any steps to demolishing
the unauathorised and illegal portion of building construction made by 4
th Respondent is illegal arbitary violation of the rule 33 of Andhra
pradesh Grama Panchyathi Land Development (Layout and Building)
Rules 2002 apart from contrary to Articles 14, 19, 21 constitution of
India and conssequently direct the 3 rd respondent to demolish un
authorised and illegal construction portion of Building situated in Sy No
775/12 in 2 nd Ward of Pathuru, Kaligiri village and Mandal, SPSR
District, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court
may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case
DATE: 12.03.2024
SPSR Nellore::District
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT
AMARAVATI
W.P. NO. OF 2024
Vemuluri Venkateswarlu.
..Petitioner
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by it's

Principle Secratory to Panchayathi
department,.
…Respondent
WRIT PETITION
Filed By:
M/s TATA SINGAIAH GOUD (10679)

Advocate
P.No 9441427903.
Counsel for Petitioner
W.P.NO. of 2024
Between:
Vemuluri Venkateswarlu,
..Petitioner
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by it's Principle Secratory to Panchayathi
department, and Others.
.Respondents.
LIST OF EVENTS
ANNEXURE – I
Page Nos Para No.

S.No Date Description of the Events in in
Affidavit Affidavit
aggrieved by high handed
action of 3 rd respondent in
collussion with Respondent No
4 in not considering the
represetations of the petitioner
dated 10.01.2024 and
11.02.2024 and allwing the
respondent No 4 to construct
her house with out leaving set
back as per rule 20 and also
the 3 rd Respondent not taken
1 2
any steps to demolishing the
unauathorised and illegal
portion of building construction
made by 4 th Respondent is
illegal arbitary violation of the
rule 33 of Andhra pradesh
Grama Panchyathi Land
Development (Layout and
Building) Rules 2002 apart
from contrary to Articles 14, 19,
21 constitution of India
i acquired the schedule house
property from my mother to an
extent of 217.8 square yards of
site in Sy. No. 775/12 in plot
no 9 situted in 2 nd ward of
2 3
Pathuru, Kaligiri village
Panchayat, Kaligiri Mandal,
SPSR Nellore District, through a
registered WILL deed vide 24 of
2012 dated 14.11.2012.
while so in the recent past the 4
4 th respondent started
prepared to construct his house
without leaving minimum
setback space abutting to my
house, when I questioned them,
they have informed that they
have highly influence in the
society and no need to leave the
set backs as per law. When I
approached to the 3 rd
respondent with written
representation dated 10.01.2024
, the panchyath secretary
assured me to stall the
construction and informed me to
take action against the 4 th
respondent. Further the 3 rd
respondent informed me that
the 4 th respondent shall have
to leave 4 feet of site in your
side
I revolved arounnd their office
with my reprsentation dated
10.01.2024. since they did not
taken action I made another
represetation dated 11.02.2024.
inspite of my representations ,
the 3 rd respondent did not
5
looked in to the issue
correspondeing to the rule 20 of
Andhra pradesh Grama
Panchyathi Land Development
(Layout and Building) Rules
2002. Wherein it is categerically
stated as follows :
the petitioner has no efficacious
alternative remedy, except seeking
the indulgence of this Hon’ble
Court to exercise the extraordinary 7
original jurisdiction vested in this
Hon’ble Court by virtue of Article
226 of the Constitution of India.
ANNEXURE-II
Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
DATE: 12.03.2024
W.P. NO. OF 2024

Between:
and Mandal, SPSR Nellor District.
..Petitioner.
AND

Nellore District.


AFFIDAVIT
I, 1. Vemuluri Venkateswarlu, S/o. Late Subbaraidu, Aged about 45 years, occ.
carpentor, R/o. D.No. 77, pathuru, Kaligiri Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellor District.,
now having temporarily come down to Amaravati, do hereby solemnly and sincerely
affirm and state as follows:
1. I submit that I am Petitioner herein and as such I am well acquainted with the
facts of the case.
2. I submit that aggrieved by high handed action of 3 rd respondent in
collussion with Respondent No 4 in not considering the represetations of the
petitioner dated 10.01.2024 and 11.02.2024 and allwing the respondent No 4 to

construct her house with out leaving set back as per rule 20 and also the 3 rd
Respondent not taken any steps to demolishing the unauathorised and illegal portion
of building construction made by 4 th Respondent is illegal arbitary violation of the
rule 33 of Andhra pradesh Grama Panchyathi Land Development (Layout and
Building) Rules 2002 apart from contrary to Articles 14, 19, 21 constitution of India
3. I submit that i acquired the schedule house property from my mother to an
extent of 217.8 square yards of site in Sy. No. 775/12 in plot no 9 situted in 2 nd
ward of Pathuru, Kaligiri village Panchayat, Kaligiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District,
through a registered WILL deed vide 24 of 2012 dated 14.11.2012. consequent to
death of my mother in recent past I have paid all these taxes to the municipality
without any pendency. Presently I am living with our family and the same is in our
possession and enjoyment without any interruption for the last 50 years. 4. I
submit that my Mother executed a WILL deed dated 14.11.2012 the same was
registered vide document no 24 of 2012 on the file of SRO Vinjamuru. while so in
the recent past the 4 th respondent started prepared to construct his house without
leaving minimum setback space abutting to my house, when I questioned them,
they have informed that they have highly influence in the society and no need to
leave the set backs as per law. When I approached to the 3 rd respondent with
written representation dated 10.01.2024 , the panchyath secretary assured me to
stall the construction and informed me to take action against the 4 th respondent.
Further the 3 rd respondent informed me that the 4 th respondent shall have to
leave 4 feet of site in your side and the 3 rd respondent assured me to be asked her
to construct as per the Rule 20 of Andhra pradesh Grama Panchyathi Land
Development (Layout and Building) Rules 2002. Where in the 4 th respondetn would
have to leave more than 4 feet while she got constructing the house. But he did not
do so, and colluded with them and allowed to her to constructing illegally with out
leaving single foot from my house site causing inconveneace to my family and
speedly proceded for construction.
5. I submit that I revolved arounnd their office with my reprsentation dated
10.01.2024. since they did not taken action I made another represetation dated
11.02.2024. inspite of my representations , the 3 rd respondent did not looked in to
the issue correspondeing to the rule 20 of Andhra pradesh Grama Panchyathi Land
Development (Layout and Building) Rules 2002. Wherein it is categerically stated as
follows :
20. Permissible Height and setback requirements. - (1) The minimum open
spaces/setbacks (Open to sky) and height restrictions shall be as follows for
considering the building permissions in Minor Gram Panchayats;
(i) Height permissible: 9 meters or G + 2 floors in Gram
Khan tarn and 13 meters or G + 2 floors height in
Revenue survey number areas;
(ii) Setbacks:
In Gram Khantam:
Front setback or building line. 1.50 meters
Rear Setback: 1.00 meters
(iii) Where the lighting and ventilation of a building is
through the means of a chowk or inner courtyard,
such open space shall be open to sky and of area at
least 3.0 Sq. meters and no side less than 1.5 meters.
33. Offences and Penalties. - (1) Any person who contravenes
any of the provisions of these rules or any requirements or
obligations imposed on him by virtue of these rules shall be
guilty of an offence by the District Panchayat Officer shall be
punished with a fine as prescribed in these rules by the District
Panchayat Officer and in case of continuing offence a daily fine
until the contravention is made good or removed;
(i) take suitable actions including demolition of unauthorized
works;
(ii) take suitable action against technical personnel, which
include prosecution or debarring him from further practice
up to three years;
6. It is submitted that as seen from the above rules the 3 rd Respndent would have
to be take action againest the 4 th respondent as per rule 33 of Andhra pradesh
Grama Panchyathi Land Development (Layout and Building) Rules 2002. Further
more the 3 rd respondent is pressurised me to compramise with the 4 th respondent
and threatning for dire consequnces in future without following due process of law is
illegal and arbitrary. Hence the Writ Petition.
7. In the circumstances stated above, the petitioner has no efficacious
alternative remedy, except seeking the indulgence of this Hon’ble Court to exercise
the extraordinary original jurisdiction vested in this Hon’ble Court by virtue of Article
226 of the Constitution of India.
The petitioner has not filed any writ petition, suit or other proceedings for the
relief or relieves sought herein.
It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue
an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the
nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of 3 rd
respondent in collussing with 4 th Respondent in not considering the
represetations of the petitioner dated 10.01.2024 and 11.02.2024 and
allwing the respondent No 4 to construct her house with out leaving set
back as per rule 20 and also the 3 rd Respondent not taken any steps to
demolishing the unauathorised and illegal portion of building
construction made by 4 th Respondent is illegal arbitary violation of the

rule 33 of Andhra pradesh Grama Panchyathi Land Development
(Layout and Building) Rules 2002 apart from contrary to Articles 14, 19,
21 constitution of India and conssequently direct the 3 rd respondent to
demolish un authorised and illegal construction portion of Building
situated in Sy No 775/12 in 2 nd Ward of Pathuru, Kaligiri village and
Mandal, SPSR District, and to pass such other order or orders as this
Hon’ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the
case.
It is therefore Further Prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to directed
the 3 rd respondent to demolish un authorised and illegal construction portion of
Building belonging to 4 Respondent situated in Sy No 775/12 in 2 nd Ward of
Pathuru, Kaligiri village and Mandal, SPSR District pending disposal of main writ
petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit just
and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Deponent.
Solemnly and sincerely affirm this the day of 12.03.2024
and signed his name in my presence.
ADVOCATE :: Amaravati.
VERIFICATION STATEMENT.
I, Vemula Venkateswarlu, S/o. Late Subbaraidu, Aged about 45 years, occ.
carpentor, R/o. D.No. 77, pathuru, Kaligiri Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellor District.,
being the petitioner/ person acquainted with the facts do hereby verify and state
that the contents of the above paras of the Affidavit are true and correct to the best
of my knowledge. The above contents are typed under my instructions and same are
read over and explained to me in vernacular language. Hence verified at Amaravati
on this the day of 12.03.2023
Advocate Deponent.
HIGH COURT
SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
W.P. NO. OF 2024
SPSR Nellore :: District

Vemula Venkateswarlu. ..Petitioners
By
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
NATURE OF APPLICATION
(Under Art. 226 of Constitution of India)
this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an
appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in
the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed
action of 3 rd respondent in collussing with 4 th Respondent
in not considering the represetations of the petitioner dated
10.01.2024 and 11.02.2024 and allwing the respondent No 4
to construct her house with out leaving set back as per rule
20 and also the 3 rd Respondent not taken any steps to
demolishing the unauathorised and illegal portion of building
construction made by 4 th Respondent is illegal arbitary
violation of the rule 33 of Andhra pradesh Grama
Panchyathi Land Development (Layout and Building) Rules
2002 apart from contrary to Articles 14, 19, 21 constitution
of India and conssequently direct the 3 rd respondent to
demolish un authorised and illegal construction portion of
Building situated in Sy No 775/12 in 2 nd Ward of Pathuru,
Kaligiri village and Mandal, SPSR District, and to pass such
other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit
just and proper in the circumstances of the case
Permitted on : 12.03.2024
Presented on : 12.03.2024
Filed on : 12.03.2024.
BATTA FORM


Nellore District.




Nellore District.


DATE: 12.03.20234
(Writ of Court Orders-Order List (To Produce and or to appear)

(Special Original Jurisdiction)
day the of two thousand
Writ Petition No. of 2023

Between:

AND


Nellore District.


Respondent No.
Mr. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD (10679) upon motion this day made in to
this Court by bring of opinion that the record to and touching upon all the
matter and contentions raised in the memorandum of representation
petition, a copy of which is annexed hereto, together with the decision
therein should be called for and pursued: IT IS HEREBY COMMANDED.
(1) That you, the aforesaid Respondent No. do sent, of our use in
High Court of Judicature Andhra Pradesh all and singular the said record
and other with all the things touching the same as fully and perfectly as
they have been made by you and now remain in your custody or power
together with this, Rule Nisi before the day of 2023 and
That you intend to oppose the petition you the aforesaid Respondent No.
do appear personally OR by Advocate on the day of 2023 at
10-30 A.M. before the court show cause why this petition should not be
complied with and that we may cause further to be done there on what of
right and according to law we shall see fit to be done.
WITNESS the Hon'ble Chief Justice of High Court of Judicature, Andhra

Pradesh at Amaravati, this the year two thousand eleven.
Hearing Date:
Assistant registrar
RETURN OF THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI ORDER : NISI
(To be endorsed on Writ to appear)
The Process of the Writ of Certiorari where of mention is which made was
served on respondent This day of two
thousand eleven
This should be served urgently on the Respondent No. and

returned to the High Court
(Sd)
writ and rule nise
------------------------------
W.P. No. of 2023
Certified that the required conveyance charges and the process for the
service of the Process have been collected it is requested that English
Translation of the Process Service, Report, it is in Vernacular, my be sent
along with the Rule-Nise returned.
FORM: 8
RETURN OF THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI ORDER NISI
(TO BE ENDORSED ON WRIT TO PRODUCE)
The process of the Writ of certiorari where of mention is within made

with all things touching the same in the several papers hereto annexed as
within commanded.
The Answer of
The respondent here
Date day of 2023
(Sd)
MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION MISC. PETITION

(UNDER SEC. 151 OF THE C.P.C.)
I.A. NO. 2024

IN
W.P. NO. OF 2024
Between:
AND

Nellore District.


It is therefore Further Prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to

directed the 3 rd respondent to demolish un authorised and illegal construction
portion of Building belonging to 4 Respondent situated in Sy No 775/12 in 2 nd
Ward of Pathuru, Kaligiri village and Mandal, SPSR District pending disposal of main
writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit
just and proper in the circumstances of the case.
DATE: 12.03.2024 Counsel for the Petitioner.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT

AMARAVATI
I.A.NO. OF 2024
IN
W.P. NO. OF 2024
DIRECTION
Filed by:

Advocate
Counsel for Petitioner

HIGH COURT
Writ miscellaneous petition
Under section 151 of CPC
IA No of 2024
In
W.P. NO. OF 2024
Vemula Venkateswarlu. ..Petitioner.

By
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
NATURE OF APPLICATION
(Under section 151 of CPC)
It is therefore Further Prayed that this Hon'ble
Court may be pleased to directed the 3 rd respondent to
demolish un authorised and illegal construction portion of
Building belonging to 4 Respondent situated in Sy No
775/12 in 2 nd Ward of Pathuru, Kaligiri village and
Mandal, SPSR District pending disposal of main writ
petition and pass such other order or orders as this
Hon’ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the
circumstances of the case.
Permitted on : 12.03.2024
Presented on : 12.03.2024
Filed on : 12.03.2024.
BATTA FORM


Nellore District.


DATE: 05.12.2023

Achari House

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Achari House

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Achari House

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

W.P. NO. OF 2024

CHECK LIST FOR WRIT PETITION

Signature of the Signature of the Advocate

W.P. No. OF 2024

Sl. Exh Description of Document Date of Date of filing Page

1. Service Certificate 12.03.2024 12.03.2023 1

The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by it's Principle Secratory to Panchayathraj

Advocate Welfare Fee : 100.00

Note: 1.Court Fee : Rs.100/- for each petitioner

W.P. NO. OF 2024

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh

2. The District Panchayath Raj Officer,

3. The Panchayathi Secretary,

4. Kondapalli. Padma, W/o Ramanaiah,

For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore

prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate

writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of

collussion with Respondent No 4 in not considering the represetations

of the petitioner dated 10.01.2024 and 11.02.2024 and allwing the

the unauathorised and illegal portion of building construction made by 4

th Respondent is illegal arbitary violation of the rule 33 of Andhra

pradesh Grama Panchyathi Land Development (Layout and Building)

Rules 2002 apart from contrary to Articles 14, 19, 21 constitution of

India and conssequently direct the 3 rd respondent to demolish un

authorised and illegal construction portion of Building situated in Sy No

775/12 in 2 nd Ward of Pathuru, Kaligiri village and Mandal, SPSR

W.P. NO. OF 2024

The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by it's

M/s TATA SINGAIAH GOUD (10679)

Page Nos Para No.

Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

W.P. NO. OF 2024

2. The District Panchayath Raj Officer,

3. The Panchayathi Secretary,

4. Kondapalli. Padma, W/o Ramanaiah,

I, 1. Vemuluri Venkateswarlu, S/o. Late Subbaraidu, Aged about 45 years, occ.

affirm and state as follows:

facts of the case.

2. I submit that aggrieved by high handed action of 3 rd respondent in

collussion with Respondent No 4 in not considering the represetations of the

petitioner dated 10.01.2024 and 11.02.2024 and allwing the respondent No 4 to

of building construction made by 4 th Respondent is illegal arbitary violation of the

rule 33 of Andhra pradesh Grama Panchyathi Land Development (Layout and

3. I submit that i acquired the schedule house property from my mother to an

through a registered WILL deed vide 24 of 2012 dated 14.11.2012. consequent to

registered vide document no 24 of 2012 on the file of SRO Vinjamuru. while so in

leaving minimum setback space abutting to my house, when I questioned them,

written representation dated 10.01.2024 , the panchyath secretary assured me to

Further the 3 rd respondent informed me that the 4 th respondent shall have to

to construct as per the Rule 20 of Andhra pradesh Grama Panchyathi Land

speedly proceded for construction.

5. I submit that I revolved arounnd their office with my reprsentation dated

11.02.2024. inspite of my representations , the 3 rd respondent did not looked in to

Development (Layout and Building) Rules 2002. Wherein it is categerically stated as

to be take action againest the 4 th respondent as per rule 33 of Andhra pradesh

more the 3 rd respondent is pressurised me to compramise with the 4 th respondent

illegal and arbitrary. Hence the Writ Petition.

7. In the circumstances stated above, the petitioner has no efficacious