Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adobe Acrobat PDF
Adobe Acrobat PDF
by
CHRISTOFFEL LOUW
at
MAY 2012
ABSTRACT
ii
Engineering with Thermodynamics as a major course, (c) had no power disposition e.g.
a former student or a laboratory assistant (excluding staff members within the
mechanical engineering department) and as an outsider, one who was not part of the
GEBL process. The quantitative scores from the assessments were analysed with
Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) to determine the extent to which interventions had
assisted student performance. The qualitative data from the interviews were analysed
with N-Vivo to reveal the impact of GEBL on student learning and understanding of
MTHE 2. The results indicated that with GEBL, the students’ overall scores improved
from the first assessment score of 46% written on half of the first module to the final
assessment score of 55% written on all seven modules. Students could handle larger
volumes of work and still obtain a higher percentage. GEBL assisted students’ in
recalling factual MTHE 2 concepts, understanding of MTHE 2 concepts, principles and
applications. GEBL also enhanced students’ ability to communicate procedures and
processes related to MTHE 2. KPIs formulated to measure the extent to which the
outcomes were met in terms of student achievement indicated a 57% achievement
thereof. The KPIs developed gave a percentage achievement of the specified outcomes
for MTHE 2 with GEBL. Theses KPIs can be used in future to measure the effectiveness
of different teaching and learning methods in terms of achieving the outcomes. It is
therefore recommended that GEBL be introduced into other engineering courses also to
assist students in understanding course content and in achieving the course outcomes.
iii
DECLARATION
I, Christoffel Louw declare that the thesis entitled ‘The Effect of a Guided Enquiry Based
Learning Approach on Mechanical Engineering Students’ Understanding of
Thermodynamics’ is my own work. All sources and resources I have used or quoted
have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references.
___________________
(Christoffel Louw)
_________________________
PROFESSOR K. J. MAMMEN
SUPERVISOR
iv
PLAGIARISM DECLARATION
from any source in an assignment or research output without the due, correct
values, conventions, ethics and norms of the different professional, academic and
lecturer/supervisor.
5. I did not and will not allow anyone to copy my work and present it as
his/hers own.
academic/research activity.
_______________ _____________
Signature Date
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge and thank the following people
who helped me throughout my Doctoral Studies:
vi
ACRONYMS
vii
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................. vi
ACRONYMS............................................................................................................. vii
CHAPTER 1 ...............................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................1
viii
1.7 Objectives ..................................................................................................... 20
1.9 Methodology.................................................................................................. 21
CHAPTER 2 ............................................................................................................. 29
LITERATURE REVIEW.............................................................................................. 29
2.2.1 Enquiry Based Learning (EBL) and Guided Enquiry Based Learning (GEBL) .... 35
2.3 Inductive and Deductive Teaching and Learning and Learning Styles ................ 38
ix
2.9 Outcomes and Key Performance Indicators ..................................................... 53
2.9.1 Outcomes................................................................................................... 53
2.9.1.3 Exit Level Outcomes of National Diploma Mechanical Engineering at WSU ... 58
CHAPTER 3 ............................................................................................................. 64
METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 64
3.3.2 Sample....................................................................................................... 69
x
3.5.1.5 Key Performance Indicators ...................................................................... 73
CHAPTER 4 ............................................................................................................. 90
4.3.1 Addressing the First and Second Research Question ................................... 120
xi
4.3.3 Structured Questionnaire........................................................................... 178
4.3.4 Summary of Quantitative Data from Formative and Summative Assessments 196
4.3.6 Summary of Data from KPIs for Tests 1, 1b, 2, 3, and Final Examination ..... 229
4.3.7 Summary of Data from KPIs for Oral Tests 1 and 2 ..................................... 240
xii
5.3 Conclusion................................................................................................... 260
5.7 Proposed Louw’s General Model for Engineering Courses ............................... 267
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................... 268
APPENDICES......................................................................................................... 285
Appendix 1 – Structured Questionnaire testing students experience with GEBL ......... 285
Appendix 10 – KPIs for measuring achievement of outcomes of oral test 1 ............... 330
Appendix 12 – Louw’s Guided Enquiry Based Learning Guide for assisting students’
learning ................................................................................................................ 337
Appendix 14 – Electronic Thesis & Dissertations (ETD) and Plagiarism Requirements 445
xiii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Features of Common Inductive Instructional Methods (Prince & Felder,
2006, p.125)........................................................................................................... 34
Table 2.2: Kolb’s Learning Cycle and Engineering Education Activities ...................... 50
Table 2.3: Movement through Kolb’s Learning Cycle with Teaching and Learning
Activities................................................................................................................. 51
Table 4.4: Quantitative Statistics from Analytical Questions in Test 1 ..................... 125
Table 4.15: Quantitative Statistics from Theory Question in Final Examination ......... 156
xiv
Table 4.16: Quantitative Statistics from Analytical Question in Final Examination ..... 160
Table 4.17: Quantitative Statistics from Overall Performance in Final Examination ... 163
Table 4.18: Quantitative Statistics on Reliability for Tests 1, 1b, 2, 3 and Final
Table 4.21: Quantitative Statistics from Overall Performance in Oral Tests 1 and 2 .. 176
Table 4.22: Quantitative Statistics from Question 1 in Structured Questionnaire ....... 178
Table 4.23: Quantitative Statistics from Question 2 in Structured Questionnaire ....... 180
Table 4.24: Quantitative Statistics from Question 3 in Structured Questionnaire ....... 182
Table 4.27: Quantitative Statistics from Question 6 in Structured Questionnaire ....... 188
Table 4.28: Quantitative Statistics from Question 7 in Structured Questionnaire ....... 190
Table 4.29: Quantitative Statistics from Question 8 in Structured Questionnaire ....... 192
Table 4.30: Quantitative Statistics from Question 9 in Structured Questionnaire ....... 194
Table 4.31: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analysis Measurements in Test 1 .......... 199
Table 4.32: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analytical Measurements in Test 1 ....... 201
Table 4.33: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Performance Measurements in Test 1 ... 203
Table 4.34: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analysis Measurements in Test 1b ........ 205
Table 4.35: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analytical Measurements in Test 1b ...... 207
Table 4.36: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Overall Performance Measurements in Test
xv
1b...... ................................... .............................................................................. 209
Table 4.37: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analysis Measurement in Test 2 ........... 211
Table 4.38: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analytical Measurements in Test 2 ....... 213
Table 4.39: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Overall Performance Measurements in Test
2.......................................................................................................................... 215
Table 4.40: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analysis Measurements in Test 3 .......... 217
Table 4.41: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analytical Measurements in Test 3 ....... 219
Table 4.42: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Overall Performance Measurements in Test
3.......................................................................................................................... 221
Table 4.43: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analysis Measurements in the Final
Table 4.44: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Analytical Measurements in the Final
Table 4.45: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Overall Performance Measurements in the
Table 4.46: Summary of results from KPI Measurements of Tests 1, 1b, 2, 3 and Final
Table 4.47: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Explanation Measurements in Oral Tests 1
Table 4.48: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Understanding Measurements in Oral Tests
Table 4.49: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Discussion Measurements in Oral Tests 1
xvi
and 2............ ....................................................................................................... 235
Table 4.50: Quantitative Statistics from KPI Overall Performance Measurements in Oral
Table 4.51: Summary of results from KPI Measurements in Oral Tests 1 and 2 ........ 239
Table 4.52: Quantitative Statistics for reliability from KPI Measurements in Oral Tests 1
xvii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Modified Zone of Proximal Development (R.G. Tharp & R. Gallimore's, 1988,
p.35)…………… ........................................................................................................ 16
Figure 2.1: Movement through Kolb’s Learning Cycle which can be enhanced by Active
Learning……… ......................................................................................................... 49
Figure 4.1: Theory Question 1.3 in Test 1 reflecting a low level of Conceptual
Figure 4.2: Theory Question 2.1 in Test 1 reflecting a high level of Conceptual
Figure 4.3: Analytical Question 1.2 in Test 1 reflecting a low level of Factual and
Figure 4.4: Analytical Question 1.3 in Test 1 reflecting a high level of Factual
Figure 4.5: Overall Performance in Test 1 with a combined Factual and Conceptual
Figure 4.6: Theory Question 1.2 in Test 1b reflecting a high level of Conceptual
xviii
Figure 4.7: Theory Question 1.4 in Test 1b reflecting a low level of Conceptual
Figure 4.8: Analytical Question 1.3 in Test 1b reflecting a high level of Factual and
Figure 4.9: Analytical Question 1.4 in Test 1b reflecting a low level of Factual and
Figure 4.10: Overall Performance in Test 1 with a combined Factual and Conceptual
Figure 4.12: Theory Question 2.3 in Test 2 reflecting a high level of Conceptual
Figure 4.13: Analytical Question in Test 2 reflecting a low level of Factual and
Figure 4.14: Analytical Question 2.4 in Test 2 reflecting a high level of Factual
Figure 4.16: Theory Question 4.1 in Test 3 reflecting a high level of Conceptual
xix
Figure 4.17: Theory Question 4.5 in Test 3 reflecting a low level of Conceptual
Figure 4.18: Analytical Question 1.4 in Test 3 reflecting a low level of Factual and
Figure 4.19: Analytical Question 3.3 in Test 3 reflecting a high level of Factual
Figure 4.21: Theory Question 7 in the Final Examination reflecting a high level of
Figure 4.22: Theory Question 9 from the Final Examination reflecting a low level of
Figure 4.23: Analytical Question 4 in the Final Examination reflecting a low level of
Figure 4.24: Analytical Question 5 in the Final Examination reflecting a high level of
xx
Figure 4.27: Question 11 in Oral Test 1 reflecting a high level of Conceptual
Figure 4.34: Question 1 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 67% of students
Figure 4.35: Question 2 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 73% of students
Figure 4.36: Question 3 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 33% of students
xxi
Figure 4.37: Question 4 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 67% of the
Figure 4.38: Question 5 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 27% of the
Figure 4.39: Question 6 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 60% of the
Figure 4.40: Question 7 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 27% of the
Figure 4.41: Question 8 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 40% of the
Figure 4.42: Question 9 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 60% of the
Figure 4.43: Students Analytical Performance with an increased workload and with
Figure 4.45: Students Analysis Performance with an increased workload and with GEBL
Figure 4.48: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Test 1 ....................... 204
xxii
Figure 4.50: Analytical Measurements with KPIs in Test 1b ..................................... 208
Figure 4.51: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Test 1b ..................... 210
Figure 4.54: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Test 2 ....................... 216
Figure 4.57: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Test 3 ....................... 222
Figure 4.58: Analysis Measurements with KPIs in the Final Examination .................. 224
Figure 4.59: Analytical Measurements with KPIs in the Final Examination ................ 226
Figure 4.60: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in the Final Examination.228
Figure 4.61: Overall KPI Achievement with an increased workload, with GEBL being
Figure 4.62: Explanation Measurements with KPIs in Oral Tests 1 and 2 ................. 232
Figure 4.63: Understanding Measurements with KPIs in Oral Tests 1 and 2 ............. 234
Figure 4.64: Discussion Measurements with KPIs in Oral Tests 1 and 2 ................... 236
Figure 4.65: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Oral Tests 1 and 2 ..... 238
xxiii
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter gives a background to this study and explains the current situation of
mechanical engineering education at Walter Sisulu University (WSU).
South Africa (SA) indicates that with the current teaching methods, course outcomes as
required by the South African Qualification Authority (SAQA) are not achieved in
learning Thermodynamics 2 (MTHE 2). Reports from various employers indicated that
students lack important skills required in the engineering field. The purpose of this
research was to investigate alternative methods of teaching and learning MTHE 2 which
The challenges contributing to engineering students’ poor performance are not unique
to SA. For example, the observations depicting experiences from India, the United
States of America and Ireland vividly indicate the challenges which engineering
education faces globally. The Indian Express newspaper reported that a large number
of engineering students from all 60 colleges across one of the states in India have failed
their examinations as declared on 27th February 2009 (Indian express.com, 2009, p.1).
1
This newspaper further reported that “250 candidates of a college who appeared for the
semester examination, 209 have failed in a paper” (Indian express.com, 2009, p.1).
Gupta, Tezcan and Mathias (2009, p.1), an innovative programme was developed to “...
improve the overall graduation rate of engineering students from 37% to 67% over a
(SIUC)”. Tully and Clarke (2008, p.3) state that “... graduation rates are often less than
Dowd, Laoulache, Nelles, Golen & Fowler, 1999, p.13c2-9). A research conducted on
Polytechnic Institute indicated that active learning did have a positive impact on student
In SA the situation is not dissimilar and research has continuously been done to address
the challenges. In the Council on Higher Education’s (CHE, 2007, pp.25-26) annual
report it was stated that only 32% of first time entering students at ‘Traditional
Universities’ complete their engineering B-degree in four years and only 5% of first time
2
three years. Many of the engineering students are therefore not performing expected
and various factors might be contributing to this such as students’ attitudes towards
their studies and their background knowledge in the particular course as well as clashes
between lecturers’ teaching styles and students’ learning styles. This study investigated
teaching and learning factors and possible alternative innovations to address some of
the challenges.
This section gives an overview of the National Diploma Mechanical Engineering (NDME)
engineering education.
This study was carried out at WSU which is a public university in the Eastern Cape of
SA. The NDME offered at WSU is a three year full-time programme. Level one of the
diploma consists of two semester programmes (S1 and S2) each consisting of six
courses. Level two of the diploma is a semester programme (S3) consisting of six
courses and a six months Mechanical Engineering Practice 1 (MEEP 1). The final year of
the diploma is a semester programme (S4) consisting of six course and a six month
Mechanical Engineering Practice 2 (MEEP 2). The total number of courses required for
3
the theory part of the diploma is 24. Each course has a credit value of 0.083. Each of
MEEP 1 and MEEP 2 carry a credit value of 0.5 which gives a total credit of ‘3’ for the
SAQA must develop and implement policy and criteria, after consultation
with the Quality Councils (QCs) for the development, registration and
following requirements:
qualification;
SAQA must develop policy and criteria, after consultation with the QCs, for
The Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA) is a professional statutory body that
visits tertiary institutions on a four year cycle to inspect the credibility of the
ECSA and are recognised as meeting the initial academic requirements for
On the E-20-PN document ND Accreditation List, Revision 1.1, 1 June 2010, p.6 of ECSA
(2009), the NDME at WSU is listed as accredited from 1996 when the first visit took
5
place. During every visit thereafter the NDME at WSU received full accreditation. The
Students’ pass rates in NDME at WSU in general are very low as revealed by the data
According to the Integrated Tertiary Software (ITS) records, WSU, 2000-2009 the
average pass rate in MTHE 2 over the past 17 years is below 40%. Recorded pass rates
from 2006-2009 are as follow: semester two 2006-16%, 2007-20% and 2009-9%.
Records of feedback from various employers over the years also indicated that
graduates from WSU lack certain skills such as communication and group work crucial
The fact that most of the mechanical engineering lecturers are more of professional
engineers than educators/academics and have not been exposed to or formally trained
in educational practices results in teaching and learning methods which do not cater for
lecturing involves the lecturer presenting the course to the students verbally and the
students listen and take notes. Traditional lecturing is still considered as the most
effective method of sharing factual information with large groups. This method gives
6
the students guidance on what to concentrate on and can be sometimes inspirational
also. The student however needs to have good listening, reading, writing and speaking
skills to ensure that the learning process is effective (Holford & Moore, 1994, p.1). Good
note-taking skills are also crucial. According to Bales (1996, p.1) students remember
only five percent of what they have been taught during a traditional lecture.
such, the new graduates need to be prepared to deal with these expectations. For the
students, the only back-up is knowledge and the skills acquired at the university.
Universities should not only teach students to “memorise knowledge”, but also focus on
developing their complex thinking and reasoning skills (Fink, 2003, p.2). According to
Kabir, Khan and Mahmud (2008, p.15), “... to successfully deal with the challenges of
the 21st century, engineers must possess three tools: knowledge, skills and attitude”.
Traditional teaching and learning approaches do not address these three tools with the
result that they are not developed by the time a student graduates. In September 2000,
which was more active and student-centred into their engineering curriculum, which
7
modified the traditional lecturer-centred teaching. This decision was inspired by, among
others, the high drop-out rates, low student motivation and shallow mastery of course
material, low retention rate, little demonstration of higher-order skills, not enough
initiative and autonomy (Aquirre, Jacmot, Milgrom, Raucent, Soucisse & Vander Borght,
2001, p.29). With reference to the traditional teaching and learning approaches Alters
and Nelson (2002, p.1893) state that “Problems with such instruction become evident
when student retention and understanding of even the most fundamental concepts in
the course is shockingly limited, as reflected in the low levels of scientific literacy even
Chang, Stern, Sondergaard and Hadgraft (2009, p.2) state that “Internationally, as
engineering schools grapple with how best to prepare effective engineers in the twenty-
first century, we are seeing a move away from transmission models of learning and
teaching, towards more constructivist models”. Chang et al. (2009, p.2) also explain
that “... the social dimensions of learning suggest that formal class time with academic
staff is not the only opportunity for engineering students to learn”. With regard to the
new challenges which the tertiary education faces in the 21st century, Salmi (2001,
p.106) states that “There are three major, intertwined new challenges which bear
heavily on the role and functions of higher education: (i) economic globalization; (ii) the
increasing importance of knowledge as a driver of growth, and (iii) the information and
a new range of competences also which graduates must acquire. These are
8
adaptability, team work, communication skills and lifelong learning. Countries which
want to address these competences must be willing to make changes in their content
and pedagogy (Materu, 2007, p.7). In SA, the traditional method of learning and
teaching the chemical engineering degree at University of Cape Town was changed and
Africa (ECSA) in 2001. Report from the research done by Martin, Maytham, Case and
skills in the workplace. It also points to the complex interactions between these
different skills, specifically that the non-technical skills area built on a technical
basis, and therefore that a lack of confidence in the technical arena would
As shown above, researchers indicate that more universities are considering active
learning methods in their quest to find a solution to the crisis. From those who have
introduced these new methods, favourable results have been experienced (Prince,
2004; Junglas, 2006). This study which was carried out at WSU would add value to
9
1.2.5 Global Trends in Engineering Education
(Poland), it was stated that “... the integration of lectures with laboratory experiences
and project work was identified as an ideal scenario” (Jones, 1998, p.1). This author
further states that the “... one basic set of skills that must be developed in engineering
students is critical thinking and problem solving” (Jones, 1998, p.2). The Ministry of
Education in New-Zealand, called for a research culture that will have a research-based
“Critical instructional objectives for the 21st century engineering students include
teaching techniques, Rugarcia, Felder, Woods and Stice (2000, p.10) state:
10
Gibson (2002, p.470) states that there is “... a steady movement away from traditional,
formal teaching and examination methods across Western Europe towards a more
fall in line with the Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) approved by the Accreditation
Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) in 1996. This required engineering
learning outcomes and accountability. Course offering was changed to less lecturing
and textbook problem solving to more active learning approaches, for example, group
work, design projects, case studies, and application exercises. Lattuca, Terenzini,
improvement.
ABET has changed the accreditation criteria and has placed more emphasis on the
project-based learning approach and also self-directed learning which will enhance life-
long learning. For students to be successful engineers in the 21st century they must be
11
communicate effectively, to be technically versatile, to be able to function in an ethnic
diverse team and to demonstrate social responsibility are some of the important skills
these engineers must poses (Savage, Chen & Vanasupa, 2007, p.2). These authors
workforce must be able to operate in a diverse global society and the recognition
p.174) states that “... the chemical engineering design module in the national diploma
The primary objective was to adopt active learning methods that would: improve
expose students to the notion that chemical engineering can provide solutions to
many of the challenges facing our society, develop the engineering hand skills
12
(especially since very few students engage in any DIY activities), improve
It is in line with the above innovative attempts, this research was designed to see the
1.3 Aim
understanding of MTHE 2.
In Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) the achievement of course outcomes is the goal
of the institution and the reason for their being. Learning and teaching methods in
Traditional teaching methods do not address individual needs in a diverse group and
this serves as a detriment to the learner (Felder & Silverman, 1988, p.674). According
away from the traditional chalk and talk teaching methods will benefit the student (and
13
Gibson (2002, p.470) continues to state, “… that traditional teaching methods are
ineffective and, in any case, neither encourage nor measure student understanding
even when teachers think otherwise”. Most classes in engineering are auditory,
deductive and intuitive. However, many engineering students are visual learners (they
prefer to see diagrams, pictures, equipment and processes), and inductive and
sequential learners and these render an immediate mismatch between teaching and
learning styles (Kapadia, 2008, p.2). Different backgrounds and childhoods deliver
learners with different reference frameworks. The gaps and shortcomings among the
learners within the same group must be bridged by applying multiple teaching methods.
Engineers are required to do much more than just recalling formulas, substituting
values and finding answers. In their daily operations, they must be able to
problems, to name a few. These are skills that universities should aim to develop during
a student’s career so that the graduate is prepared for the industry. In order to achieve
Over the past 17 years, the present researcher has observed a worrying trend with
decreasing throughput rates of the WSU NDME students as reflected in HEMIS, 2009.
The methods that are used to lecture to the students do not address the students’
needs and often new course materials are presented in a manner that make it
14
impossible for students to understand and follow. In Mechanical Engineering, the aim is
to produce graduates with problem solving skills, who can express themselves in
could be addressed.
The problem is that the NDME students have difficulties in performing academically well
in the course. The study is focused on the effect of GEBL approach on students’
understanding of MTHE 2.
Vygotsky was a social constructivist who believed that learners used the input of others
as they formulate their constructions and not relied solely on themselves. In Vygotskian
theory:
Tharp and Gallimore (1988, p.35) draw from social constructivism to explain proximal
and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under or
in collaboration with more capable peers” (Lipscomb, Swanson & West, 2004 cited in
Hardjito, 2010, p.131). Hardjito further states that “In the view of ZPD, the role of
teachers is to provide assistance or support to students with tasks that are just beyond
students’ current capability. When students’ gradually develop their mastery, teachers
16
start the process of ‘fading’, or gradual removal of the temporary support” (Lipscomb et
Reagan and Osborn (2002, p.60), explain that in social constructivism, which is the
inevitably takes place in a socio-cultural context, and that therefore knowledge is in fact
socially constructed”. Fraser and Tobin (1997, p.8) explain that in social constructivism,
“... learning is not viewed as transfer of knowledge but the learner actively
constructing, or even creating, his or her knowledge on the basis of the knowledge
already held”. Active teaching and learning methods are based on social constructivism
and Brader-Araje (2002, p.1) behaviourism “... placed the responsibility for learning
... people may react to the same information in very different ways while
17
De Graaf, Saunders-Smits and Nieweg (2005, p.38) state that “... students bring to
behave in certain ways, and that they build upon them or modify them in learning
Picton and Demian (2007, p.2) explain in the context of Bloom’s taxonomy, “... the
higher level cognitive skills of analysis, synthesis and evaluation are relevant to our
ability to effectively solve problems. The effective development of these skills, however,
requires mediation”. According to Ma (2009, p.164) in active learning, “... high levels of
learning, nurturing a space for fostering higher order thinking through co-creation of
state that “... one of the major goals of science and technology education today is to
The core ingredients of an EBL approach that some researchers are in agreement with
approach to teaching in which the role of the teacher is to act as a facilitator; a move to
self-directed learning with students taking increasing responsibility for their learning and
Smith, et al., 2007, p.2). Geer and Rudge (2004, p.3) state:
18
... knowledge is fluid, not static; therefore, instructional practices reiterating
ill-conceived notions regarding science and knowledge of the world within the
disciplines it encompasses.
Social constructivism and its impacts on student learning therefore are adopted as the
1.6.1 What would be the effect of a guided enquiry-based learning (GEBL) approach
1.6.2 What would be the effect of a guided enquiry-based learning (GEBL) approach
1.6.3 What would be the effect of a guided enquiry-based learning (GEBL) approach
1.6.4 To what extent would the formulation and use of key performance indicators
19
1.7 Objectives
applications;
thermodynamics.
1.7.2 To apply the principle of key performance indicators (KPIs) as a tool for
thermodynamics.
The students can benefit from an investigation into improved teaching methods.
Students can be better prepared for their future careers which will result in more
productive engineers and technicians entering the industry. Most of these students have
a disadvantaged background and are therefore battling even more with the rapidly
effective and efficient than the present more traditional methods will definitely lay a
sound foundation and build a proper framework for future reference as suggested by
benefit from the findings of this study. Being able to come up with a solution to the
problem or to improve student performance and delivering a graduate more ready for
1.9 Methodology
This study was a Participatory Action Research (PAR) with the researcher (change
agent) being part of this study through his academic responsibility for MTHE 2. The
purpose of this study was to assess the effect of GEBL approach on Mechanical
and evaluated to improve the manner in which MTHE 2 was presented to students. The
focus was to empower students and measure students’ performance not just in terms of
academic scores but also in the development of multiple skills necessary for an
determine the extent to which this intervention assisted in achieving these outcomes.
East London out of a population of 40. The sample consisted of fulltime students who
21
1.9.2 Instrument and Data Collection
Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. The semester tests, oral test, final
examination and structured questionnaire were used to gather the quantitative data.
assessments and the summative assessment were designed to test not only analytical
abilities but also the students’ understanding, interpretation and analysis of questions.
The oral test was designed to determine the students’ knowledge on certain aspects of
MTHE 2 course content. Key performance indicators were developed to measure the
extent to which the course outcomes were achieved. These indicators were designed to
measure the selected outcomes which were relevant to this course. The structured
questionnaires were used to measure the students’ rating of various aspects of the
intervention. This was designed to gather quantitative responses from the students
regarding their experience with GEBL. Finally, students were also interviewed to gather
MTHE 2.
1.10.1 The students’ social and economic backgrounds were not considered, although
22
they were recognized that these factors may have an influence on their academic
performance.
1.10.2 These students had all passed the pre-requisite for this course and were starting
considered.
1.10.3 The study did not consider factors such as lighting, ventilation, indoor air quality
and acoustics.
1.10.4 The students’ commitment during the semester could influence the study and
1.10.5 The student’s attitude could influence the study and everything possible was
done to ensure that all subjects in the sample had a focused and positive
attitude.
1.10.6 In order to avoid the research bias, interviews were done by a person who
a delimitation.
1.10.7 The venue suitable and available for group sessions could only accommodate 20
students.
A number of terms are defined to assist the reader in understanding the specific context
and meaning in which they appear and are used in this document.
23
Active Learning – “... an instructional method which engages students in the learning
and think about what they are doing” (Prince, 2004, p.223).
Guided Enquiry Based Learning – “... refers to an array of classroom practices that
complex questions and problems. Rather than teaching the results of others'
and learning through the process of active investigation itself” (Lee, 2004, p.9).
Enquiry – “... generally refers to a process of asking questions, generating and pursuing
those data, drawing conclusions from them, communicating those conclusions, applying
conclusions back to the original question, and perhaps following up on new questions
that arise” (Krajcik et al., 1998; NRC, 1996; White & Frederiksen, 1998 cited in
Inductive Learning – “... effective instruction must set up experiences that induce
their prior beliefs and misconceptions in light of the evidence provided by the
24
Outcomes – “Anticipated or achieved results of programs or the accomplishment of
knowledge, cognitive skills, and attitudes” (Vlasceanu, Grunberg & Parlea 2007, p.63).
frequently treats new courses and new topics within courses as self-contained bodies of
knowledge, presenting theories and formulas with minimal grounding in students’ prior
knowledge and little or no grounding in their experience” (Prince & Felder, 2006,
p.125).
Universities of Technology, are higher education institutions that provide and promote,
in co-operation with the private and public sectors, quality career and technology
education and research for the developmental needs of a transforming South Africa and
applied engineering; biological, chemical and physical sciences; and applied commercial
25
(CTP), 2001, p.1).
Chapter 1
In this chapter a background to the study was given, highlighting the problems that
engineering education experiences globally and the reasons for this research. The
and sub-questions, significance of the proposed study, limitations and delimitations and
rationale were presented and explained. A list with definitions of pertinent terms used,
were listed.
Chapter 2
In this chapter the literature related to this study is cited. The terms effective teaching
and significant learning are also discussed. The reason for selecting GEBL is also
explained. A definition of outcomes and the particular outcomes for NDME as specified
by SAQA is discussed and from these outcomes certain outcomes are selected which
applies to MTHE 2.
Chapter 3
In this chapter the methodology is discussed. The modes of enquiry are explained as
well as the population and sample. A detailed explanation and discussion of how the
instruments were used to assess the students. Specific KPIs which were developed to
26
address the achievement of the selected outcomes for MTHE 2 are given.
Chapter 4
In this chapter the data collection, data analysis, interpretation and discussions are
given. The findings from the data and its meaning to engineering education are also
elaborated on. The evidence gathered from this data is discussed in detail and
arguments are made, based on this data. Lessons learned from the research and the
Chapter 5
In this chapter conclusions are drawn from the results of the study. The effect that
GEBL had on student learning in terms of test and examination scores as well as the
technical vocabulary and responsibility developed towards their own studies will be
WSU. A model is proposed for MTHE 2 and a general model is proposed for other
1.13 Summary
In the introduction and background to this study, a need for this investigation was
established. The aims and objectives were stipulated which indicated that a more
27
effective method of teaching and learning engineering students needed to be developed
and the impact of these methods on student learning would be evaluated. The problem
WSU. The epistemological approach to acquiring knowledge will be active learning and
social constructivism. It was indicated under the research questions that the effect of
The research was PAR with group sessions to deal with course content and the
structured questionnaire and an interview. Both qualitative data and quantitative data
were collected and studied. Certain limitations and delimitations were listed which could
have impacted on the study. A brief rationale was given to indicate to the reader what
inspired the researcher to undertake this study. Definitions of important terms used in
this study were also given to clarify the use of these terms and their meaning in the
context of this study. The organisation of this study was given to briefly indicate to the
reader the various chapters and the information each one deals with.
28
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter reviews pertinent literature for this study to address the themes suggested
by research objectives. In addressing the themes of the first three objectives, the focus
where active learning, EBL and GEBL in engineering were used and the findings from
such reports. Kolb’s Learning Cycle, Bloom’s Taxonomy (Cognitive Domain), effective
teaching and significant learning will also be discussed as well as the meaning of deep
and surface learning and how it assists student development. In addressing the fourth
theme, SAQA and ECSA’s views on outcomes will be presented and KPIs to measure
these outcomes will be discussed. This review will seek to indicate how the research
objectives can be addressed by different teaching and learning styles and how different
Social constructivism has many applications in education. This section will look at
research done with social constructivism as the underpinning theory and its impact on
Margison and Strobel (2008, p.84) state, “Through language acquisition and guided
29
instruction, then, Vygotsky’s model of social constructivism leads students toward
educational objectives designed to provide them with certain crucial forms of social and
cultural knowledge”.
Boyle, 2003; Ferreira & Mueller, 2004; Michaelides, Eleftheriou & Muller, 2004; Brodie &
Products (ALPs) to engage the students in a more active learning process. These ALPs
were situated within social constructivism and results indicated that it improved student
learning and that the students needed more learning activity in courses (Linsey, Talley,
White & Jensen, 2009, pp.18-19). According to Kitto (2010, p.S3G-6) in a research
done in Material Engineering course, “... the improved outcomes were all based on the
basic principles of social and cognitive constructivism”. Kitto further explains that “...
for learning processes which include individual learning, active participation by the
learner and collaborative learning as suggested by Reagan and Osborn (2002, p.59).
activity. This means that the students are using more senses and that there is
30
interaction between them and the information in the form of discussions, exchanging of
ideas and sharing of views. According to Prince (2004, p.223) the definition of active
learning is, “... any instructional method which engages students in the learning
Felder and Brent (2003, p.282) suggested that active learning may increase the
performance percentage, and simultaneously work well even in large groups despite the
difficulty to get most of the students actively involved in the process. The advantage of
social learning too kicks in. Furthermore, as Felder and Brent (2003, p.282) emphasise,
a self study session even for a few minutes during the lecturing session, may inspire
students on the topic under discussion and motivate and stimulate student
participation.
Although active learning is rather a fairly new method of teaching and learning process,
this move away from the traditional ‘chalk and talk’ and lecturer-centred approach, has
already proven to be more fruitful. The more the students are actively involved with the
learning process, the more they will want to experience, find out, discover, learn,
realise and understand the concepts. Above all, many engineering principles which are
31
Prince (2004, p.229), based on his study on active teaching methods, states that “...
this study has found support for all forms of active learning examined”. Prince (2004,
p.229) continues, “... students will remember more content if brief activities are brought
(CBI) was used as an intervention, Anderson, Taraban and Sharma (2005, p.1168)
state, “We believe that a current challenge in engineering education is to develop active
learning exercises that are simple, relate to the learner's experience level, and that can
claimed that the data collected from an active learning experience in Mechanical
Engineering Technology course “... clearly showed evidence of increased learning with
class and found that “... students gained a better understanding of thermodynamic
processes and achieved higher scores in the final examinations”. In Saudi Arabia a
study done with active learning tools in a Thermo-Fluid course created the opportunity
for, “... discussion boards that allow for student interaction among themselves... it has
This helped actually to motivate the students to further explore various aspects of
thermo-fluid problems”. This view was also supported by (Zubair & Antar, 2004, p.4).
According to De Weck, Young and Adams (2003, p.11), with regard to an active
32
learning approach at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, “Presenting
estimation”.
Problem Solving (PPS) was used as a co-operative learning strategy to enhance the
Thermodynamics (van Niekerk, Mentz & Smit, 2011, p.178). At the Witwatersrand
University (WITS), an alternative teaching approach was introduced and this was
33
Table 2.1 gives a summary of some active learning methods.
for learning
for learning
learning
learning
themselves
their responses
Active learning 2 2 2 2 2 2
Collaborative/cooperative (team- 4 3 3 4 4 4
based) learning
34
2.2.1 Enquiry Based Learning (EBL) and Guided Enquiry Based Learning
(GEBL)
discovery learning. There is some agreement with regard to what will form the core
understanding;
EBL shifts the emphasis to the student with the lecturer merely facilitating the
process;
EBL puts the responsibility on the student who must take charge of his/her own
learning;
Prince and Felder (2006, p.124) explain that the, “... support for the use of EBL comes
learning”.
35
Lee (2004, p.1) states that EBL also promotes:
... the ability to formulate good questions, identify and collect appropriate
conclusions and evaluate the worth and importance of those conclusions. It may
also involve the ability to identify problems, examine problems, generate possible
There is however a negative attitude towards EBL approach which is driven by the
perception that it requires more work. However, lecturers can also benefit from EBL
through the enhanced active involvement and interaction with students and
incorporating theoretical lectures with research engagement, still some lecturers may
find a paradigm shift very difficult (Spronken-Smith, et al., 2007, p.4). In a study done
with EBL in a Engineering Mechanics course, Miller–Young (2007, p.9) states that “...
this project incorporated all the principles for supporting critical thinking, and stimulated
student interest in the course as well as engineering in general”. Hanson (2006, p.3)
that “To support this research-based learning environment, POGEL uses learning teams,
responsibility”.
36
Prince and Felder (2006, p.134) state that “... enquiry learning is the simplest of the
inductive approaches and might be the best one for inexperienced or previously
traditional instructors to begin with”. Edwards and Recktenwald (2008, p.8) explain that
“... guided enquiry learning provides a rich environment for enhancing the learning
experience”. Edwards and Recktenwald (2008, p.8) continues to state, that the GEBL
experiences were, “... giving them more exposure to the topics than they would
... the multi-media, coupled with the guided enquiry activity worksheets,
provided students with a tangible way to engage the material as well as provided
a break from the typical college-course format. Students were given the valuable
opportunity to work on activities and discuss them with their peers, broadening
were also an opportunity for students to directly interact with the professor and
teaching assistants.
Research done in a science class based on GEBL found that students understood
concepts explained to them better. There was also sufficient evidence that the
classroom discussions and the science notebooks used as part of the GEBL approach
37
assisted students in achieving a deeper understanding of course content and also
developed complex reasoning abilities (Klentschy & Thompson, 2008, p.7). GEBL has
student learning (Thompson, Alford, Liao, Johnson & Matthews, 2005; Donath, Spray,
Thompson, Alford, Craig & Matthews, 2005; Richards & Schnittka, 2007; Taraban,
2.3 Inductive and Deductive Teaching and Learning and Learning Styles
The following section deals with inductive and deductive teaching and learning and the
Inductive teaching presents a student with a problem which must be solved and as the
student works through the problem he/she will learn the principles, rules, procedures
and theories related to the problem. In deductive teaching and learning, the student is
first supplied with principles and theories and is later introduced to their application.
The method of Inductive teaching and learning places more emphasis on the student. It
involves the student in the learning process through asking questions, investigating
problems, discussions in groups and conducting research. Prince and Felder (2006,
p.125) corroborate this view. An inductive teaching and learning approach is being used
38
more and more as an alternative to traditional deductive teaching by researchers
(Hesketh, Farrell & Slater, 2002; Kitto, 2009; McKenna, Yalvac & Light, 2009; Felder &
learning and to develop multiple skills. Elshorgaby and Schonwetter (2002, p.297) state
that “The most prevalent form of teaching is still the traditional lecture, or deductive
instruction ... this format of instruction is the least effective in promoting learning”.
In engineering education, where a heat and mass transfer course was presented to
students in an inductive manner, Farrell and Hesketh (2000, p.3) state, “We have found
that this inductive approach to heat and mass transfer has naturally created
opportunities for active learning via laboratory experiments and in-class discussions of
retention of new material...” Bardet and Ragusa (2009, p.2) explain that “Inductive
The School of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering at the NWU in SA changed their
report writing and audiovisual presentation and debating skills (Serfontein & Fick, 2011,
39
p.183).
Previous studies have also shown that learning styles play a very important role in how
learner. Many researchers (Goldfinch, Carew & McCarthy, 2008; Kapadia, 2008;
Lamancusa, Zayas, Soyster, Morell & Jorgensen, 2008; Naher, Brabazon & Looney,
2008; O’Dwyer, 2008) have investigated the importance of teaching and learning styles
on engineering students’ academic performance. They have found that learning styles
and the teaching styles have a direct influence on students’ learning. Reid (2005, p.21)
states that “... learning styles can therefore be a vehicle for ensuring that the
environment”.
year mechanical and electrical students, O’Dwyer (2009, p.5) concludes, “... it is
wide a range of learning styles as possible”. If lecturers (teachers) know about the
different learning styles and where their own learning style fits in the spectrum of
learning styles, it will help them to recognise and accommodate students with different
learning styles. It will help in the way they present a lecture to cater for various
learning styles. It will also improve student learning when information is presented to
40
them in a manner that falls in line with their learning styles (Davis, 1993, p.189).
Most intuitive professors and even many of the sensing professors teach in an
student learning and the development of skills in various engineering courses (Ditcher,
2001; Qualters, Sheahan, Mason, Navick & Dixon, 2008; Su, 2008; Felder et al., 2010).
Effective teaching and learning can be achieved by focusing on the following points
41
Killen (2006, p.3) lists in his book the effective teaching strategies which indicate that
students are able to perceive relationships between their existing knowledge and
students must be made aware of how to focus at all times in lectures. The lecturer must
therefore instruct the class in a way that will encourage the students to think more
effectively. Active teaching and learning methods engage students more directly and
effectively in their learning process and will assist the lecturer in presenting material to
the students in a manner which will be more effective than the traditional teaching
Students must make use of the correct learning strategies to achieve effective learning.
Learning strategies can involve any activity which the students use to achieve a learning
goal e.g.; cognitive, meta-cognitive, motivational and affective. Cognitive strategies can
42
be rehearsal, elaboration and organisation. Rehearsal helps the student’s attention and
the ability to encode information. Elaboration helps the student to improve his/her long-
term memory and to make a connection between existing (old) and new information.
The student uses what he/she already knows to understand the new information.
connection between the parts of the information (De La Harpe & Radloff, 2007, pp.2-3).
In this section Fink’s (2003) taxonomy of significant learning will be discussed as well as
a clear connection between the active teaching and learning process and the different
significant learning’ defined various aspects of personal development which will result in
Foundational knowledge: this is basic knowledge that the students have about
a specific topic or area, which will in turn assist them in their learning of further
aspects of that particular topic or area. More complex learning will therefore be
43
Application learning: here the student must be able to learn how to think for
example critically and practically from a safety point of view. Application goes
Integration: here the student is able to make a connection between what has
engineering. The student can relate the theory to practical applications and will
The Human dimension of learning: the student realises how he/she is learning.
The student can also come to realise how other students interpret or understand
Caring: the student changes his/her ‘attitude’ about something and start caring
more for something e.g., if a student understands a particular course he/she will
Learning how to learn: the student learns something about the process of
learning. For example, the student learns how to analyse a problem by following
Fink (2003, pp.7-8) further states that “... the more that these kinds of learning occur,
the more significant the learning experience is. In fact, the most significant kind of
learning experience is one in which students achieve all six kinds of significant
learning”.
44
2.6 Deep and Surface Learning
Two main categories of learning have been identified: a deep approach and a
integrate them.
assessing and regulating their own learning behaviour. They strive for deep
understanding and assess how well they know the material in addition to what
that can only be achieved by deep learning, rather than the surface learning by
to achieve deep learning in their course offers. This will result in the development of
45
multiple skills necessary for the profession (Qualters, 2008; Felder, 2010; Litzinger,
approach. Ying (2003, p.44) suggests that “... we need to change our teaching
encourage our students to adopt a deep level approach to their learning, and to
states in her dissertation that “The results of the data regarding retention and the
approach to learning indicated a very strong trend toward higher retention for students
with a deeper approach to learning and lower retention for students with a surface
approach to learning”.
Case and Marshall (2009, p.11) explain in her study on deep and surface learning that
strategy...” While comparing the achievement of learning outcomes, Case and Marshall
(2009, p.13) state, “Students who were identified as using a deep approach were also
seen to have qualitatively superior learning outcomes, as well as greater recall of facts”.
In summary Cope (2003, p.415) states, “Only deep learning approaches have been
associated with the development of deep levels of understanding”. Lublin (2003, p.3)
explains that “Students who take a deep approach have the intention of understanding,
engaging with, operating in and valuing the subject...” Robbins and Ardebili (2006, p.6)
suggest that “Engineering students need effective problem-solving abilities and these
46
come by deep conceptual understanding of the fundamental physical understanding”.
In the USA, Rose, Kumar, Aleven, Robinson and Wu (2006, p.8) found that “... the
student has the potential to gain a deeper understanding of the design space and
Surface learning does not link new knowledge to prior knowledge and it replaces one
set of knowledge with another without actually understanding it (Hay, 2007, p.50).
trying to pass the course with minimal effort. Since engagement has no
Students who take a surface approach tend not to have the primary intention of
47
motivation tends to be that of jumping through the necessary hoops in order to
Maier, Barnett, Warren and Brunner (1998, p.23) explain that “Surface learning, as the
name suggests, applies to learning where the student takes on board ideas from the
teacher, but does not ‘translate’ or adapt those ideas in any way”. McKenna et al.
(2009, p.19) state that “Students with surface learning approaches are more likely to
According to Nilson (2010, p.231) Kolb’s learning cycle, “... portrays the process of
48
Concrete Experience
CE - (Feeling)
Abstract Conceptualization
AC - (Thinking)
Figure 2.1: Movement through Kolb’s Learning Cycle which can be enhanced
by Active Learning
According to Kuri (2000, p.5) Kolb’s learning cycle as illustrated in figure 2.1, “...
increases the students' motivation with learning styles that are not assisted by the
... the model here described supplies that opportunity, because besides helping
of the necessary abilities for the resolution of problems and the communication
development of analysis abilities, synthesis and evaluation, abilities which are not
teaching.
49
Kolb’s Learning Cycle Engineering Education Process/Activity
Table 2.2 illustrates the movement through Kolb’s learning cycle in engineering
education.
50
Movement through Kolb’s Learning Teaching and learning process/activity
Cycle
(What if I use this approach?) Applying what have been learned to new
problems
Table 2.3: Movement through Kolb’s Learning Cycle with Teaching and
Learning Activities
Kolb’s learning cycle is widely used as pedagogy for teaching students engineering in
courses. Researchers in engineering education (Ogot & Okudan 2006; Kapranos, 2007;
Aziz & Chassapis, 2008; Altuger, Tumkor & Chassapis, 2009; Stappenbelt, 2010) use
the movement through Kolb’s cycle to plan and structure course presentation to
students can be taught in a manner which promotes the movement through Kolb’s
learning circle, “... students can retain this knowledge for longer periods of time and
apply it to different cases and in different situations. This is ideal for the training future
51
engineers”.
starting from low at the bottom to high at the top. The lower level has to occur before
the next higher one can be achieved and progressively the learner will work his/her way
through the different levels from ‘knowledge’ > ‘comprehension’ > ‘application’ >
‘analysis’ > ‘synthesis’ > ‘evaluation’. Rutkowski, Moscinska and Jantos (2010, p.2)
listed the six levels in Bloom’s cognitive domain with equivalent key words as follows:
propose, write,
Many researchers use Bloom’s taxonomy in engineering research to improve, gauge and
evaluate course offerings to students (Terry & Harp, 1993; Reeves, Courter, Nickels,
Noyce, Pearce, Schaefer, Wickramasinghe & Lyle, 1998; Prince & Hoyt, 2002;
Elshorbagy & Schonwetter, 2002; Hopson, Simms & Knezek, 2002; Żywno, 2003; Boles,
52
Beck & Hargreaves, 2005; Uziak, Oladiran & Moalosi, 2010). The various levels in
Bloom’s cognitive domain of educational activities are seen to be important for the
engineering education. This view is corroborated by Boles et al. (2005, p.3). With
regard to the cognitive objectives of Bloom’s taxonomy, Irish (1999, p.84) states that
“Ideally, engineers need to function at all levels”. The effectiveness and impact of
Bloom’s taxonomy. Researchers make extensive use of the lower and higher order
thinking skills in the cognitive domain to determine the success of their intervention in
terms of student learning and achievement (Kaw, Besterfield & Eison, 2005; Craig,
Joines, Miller, C., Miller, T., Raubenheimer, Rouskas, Silverberg & Wiebe, 2008; Castles,
2.9.1 Outcomes
cognitive skills, and attitudes”. Vlasceanu et al. (2007, p.63) further state that
“Outcomes are direct results of the instructional program, planned in terms of learner
growth in all areas”. The term ‘student learning outcomes’ was defined by Vlasceanu, et
53
al. (2007, p.64) as, “Statements of what a learner is expected to know, understand, and
intellectual and practical skills gained and demonstrated by the successful completion of
Hanrahan (2007, p.51) explains from an ECSA point of view the outcomes which must
The Stage 2 outcomes that demonstrate that a person has the competence to fulfil the
54
Exercising sound judgement in the course of engineering activities and
engineering problems;
specialised areas;
a team;
The SAQA document (SAQA, Registered Qualifications, 2010) states the following under
55
decisions, using critical and creative thinking, have been made;
or community;
effectively;
isolation;
communities;
From the above list of outcomes, the following outcomes apply to MTHE 2 and at this
level students are not required to demonstrate their ability in the remaining exit level
outcomes.
56
Exit level outcomes:
problems;
specialised areas;
team;
Identify and solve problems in which responses show that responsible decisions,
community;
Organize and manage oneself and one’s activities responsibly and effectively;
57
2.9.1.3 Exit Level Outcomes of National Diploma Mechanical Engineering
at WSU
The programs’ exit level outcomes are aimed at providing graduates with the following
legislation;
58
Vlasceanu, et al. (2007, p.60) as, “A range of statistical parameters representing a
performing in a certain quality dimension”. Vlasceanu et al. (2007, p.60) further explain
institutional activities, include the number of applications per place, the entry scores of
candidates, the staff workload, the employability of graduates, research grants and
According to Gaither, Nedwek & Neal (1994, p.1), “... the main advantage of such
objective”.
Institutions when developing impact and KPIs are presented by Schofield (2007, p.15):
be made about what preparation for study works best, and why;
59
In relation to international students: performance data collected over time
study) for international students (by category and subject), and the
The Australian Catholic University (ACU) summarised the purpose of their KPIs as
below:
To improve the quality of learning and teaching across all programs of the
University;
To enhance the ACU student experience (ACU Learning and Teaching Plan
2009-2011, p.2).
In the Strategic Planning and Resourcing report of the University of Johannesburg (UJ),
KPIs are expected to measure the extent to which 10 goals (outcomes) have been
achieved. Some of the goals (outcomes) more relevant to teaching and learning are as
follows:
60
assurance practices and actively developing and implementing innovative
KPI must therefore measure to what extent the desired outcomes have been achieved.
KPI can be used as a management tool to measure the institutions performance and
also on the academic side of higher education institutions, as a tool to measure the
effectiveness of teaching practices. KPIs in this research were developed based on the
2.10 Summary
Social constructivism as the underpinning theory and its use in higher education was
explained. Inductive and deductive teaching and learning was discussed and their
differences were pointed out. The role that individual learning styles play in teaching
and learning approaches, were also explained. The influence of the active teaching and
discussed. There was also a look at what effective teaching and learning meant and
61
how this can be achieved and measured. This was done to show the compatibility
between active teaching and learning methods and the components of effective
A description of significant learning was also given and all the components which
constitute it were addressed, together with active teaching and learning. The terms
‘deep’ and ‘surface’ learning were defined and the results and students’ aims with each
approach were explained. The importance of the movement through Kolb’s learning
cycle during a course offering to enhance student learning and to address the different
learning styles were also discussed, as well as the use of Bloom’s taxonomy for
SAQA and ECSA’s views on outcomes for NDME were discussed. From the SAQA listed
outcomes, those applicable to MTHE 2 were selected. The exit level outcomes listed in
WSU prospectus for NDME as well as the exit level and critical level outcomes for the
NDME as listed by SAQA were presented. The exit level outcomes listed in WSU
prospectus for NDME were presented. KPIs were formulated based on these selected
The literature review has set the scene to view GEBL as an active learning approach
particular. GEBL also has all the ingredients for deep learning to occur which translates
62
into significant learning. Furthermore, the KPI’s within the context of engineering
education in general and the South African context in particular have been delineated in
this chapter.
63
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
This chapter deals with the methodology and related aspects such as the modes of
enquiry, population and sample, ethical considerations, reliability and validity, and the
Bryman (1989, p.149) states that “Action research can reasonably be conceptualized as
a research design which entails a particular framework within which the relationship
between the researcher and the subject takes place”. In this particular study the
relationship was between the researcher as the lecturer and the students taking MTHE
2.
64
reflection, theory and practice, in participation with others, in the pursuit of
Avison, Lau, Myers, and Nielsen (1999, pp.95-96) state that action research can be
• Action science trying to resolve conflicts between espoused and applied theories;
This study used the third type which was suitable to test the impact of the intervention
and to reflect on, and to take the necessary remedial action. It was also found suitable
This study was Participatory Action Research (PAR) with the researcher (change agent)
being part of this study through his academic responsibility for MTHE 2. The purpose of
this study was to develop an intervention and to implement that particular intervention.
The intervention that was chosen as a departure point was GEBL. The intervention was
then reviewed and evaluated to improve the manner in which each module of MTHE 2
65
was presented to students. The focus was to empower students, measure students’
performance not just in terms of academic scores but also in the development of
MTHE 2 was also measured to determine the extent to which this intervention assisted
in achieving these outcomes. Huizer (1997, p.2) states that “Participatory action
... One aim is to produce knowledge and action directly useful to a group of
action. The second aim is to empower people at a second and deeper level
through the process of constructing and using their own knowledge: they "see
through" the ways in which the establishment monopolizes the production and
The students were given feedback at the end of each assessment to highlight problem
areas and to make them aware of the areas in which they needed to spend more time
on. They were also encouraged to use what they have learnt from group members (e.g.
different approaches to problem solving) and to apply it during individual sessions. This
approach gave immediate feedback and allowed for sufficient time for corrective action.
66
3.2 Modes of Enquiry
This study made use of both qualitative and quantitative modes of enquiry to measure
the correlations between the quantitative data collected through assessments and
qualitative data collected with interviews. This also determined whether the data were
in support of each other and whether it was consistent. A discussion of qualitative and
quantitative modes of enquiry will be given to highlight the type of data that were
knowledge claims, strategies of enquiry, and methods of data collection and analysis”.
particular event. There is no fixed method which can be used for all studies and
whatever the method used by one researcher may be accepted, partly accepted or
completely changed by another. To make sense of the data collected during a study
using the process of analysis may be the only thing that qualitative researchers are in
agreement with (Tesch, 1990, p.4). The 20 students who took part in this research
Kirk and Miller (1986, p.9) defined qualitative research as, “... a particular tradition in
67
social science that fundamentally depends on watching people in their own territory and
interacting with them in their own language, on their own terms”. Interviews were done
with the students at the end of the semester, to find out from them what their views
were regarding GEBL and how it impacted on their learning and skills development.
is in the form of words (Punch, 2005, p.3). According to Burns and Grove (2004, p.21):
numerical data are used to obtain information about the world. This research
Formative assessments, an oral test, a summative assessment and KPIs were used to
gather quantitative data from the students. These quantitative data were then analysed
students’ performance in terms of assessment scores and to what extent the outcomes
68
3.3 Population and Sample
The population and sample of this research study are discussed below. The process
3.3.1 Population
The population for this study were all the students enrolled for NDME in SA. The
accessible population were 40 students who enrolled for the NDME at WSU Chiselhurst
site.
3.3.2 Sample
Marshall and Rossman (2006, p.64) state that a “... sample selection should be planned
around practical issues, such as the researcher’s comfort level, ability to fit into some
role during participant observation, and access to a range of subgroups and activities”.
The sample drawn from this population was 20 students who voluntarily agreed to take
With regard to ethics in qualitative research, the research should avoid harming
participants, which includes not invading their privacy and also not deceiving them
about the research aims (Flick, 2006, p.46). The participants in this research were
69
properly informed about the purpose of the research, the methods of instructions which
they would be subjected to and the need for the voluntary participation of individuals.
With regard to ethics when performing a survey the following three important points as
The survey should not waste but rather respect the time of the respondents which
All data gathered from participants for this study were treated with the strictest
3.5 Instrumentation
The instruments will be discussed in the following sequence: firstly the formative
assessments (written and oral), secondly the summative (written) assessments, thirdly
the structured questionnaire, fourthly the KPIs and a finally the open-ended interviews.
70
3.5.1.1 Formative Assessments
Three formative assessments (see Appendices 3-6) were done on six of the seven
modules in the syllabus (written tests: the duration of tests 1 and 1b were 90 minutes,
test 2 was 90 minutes and test 3 was 2 hours). These tests were designed to test the
certain number of steps. The students were also required to explain their understanding
of certain aspects of the syllabus and in some questions the students had to give a brief
explanation of what they understood. They also had to discuss the significance of
answers to certain questions from safety and engineering point of views. This was done
in order to determine the students’ conceptual knowledge of the course and the
application thereof. So the focus was not just on their ability to perform analytical
procedures.
Most of the questions required students to explain their understanding of what they
were to calculate before actually performing the calculation. The reason for presenting
the questions in this manner was to find out whether students actually knew what they
were doing. The aim was to teach them not just to do something without knowing the
reason or its significance. This also tested their conceptual knowledge regarding a
specific section of the work. Here the student could not obtain any mark if he/she could
not explain what was expected. These tests were allocated an ‘analysis’ score as well as
an ‘analytical’ score. The analysis scores depended on the students’ ability to recall
facts, to explain certain concepts and to give an accurate description of the processes
71
and procedures. The analysis scores were also influenced by the accuracy of
accompanying diagrams. The analytical scores were determined by the students’ ability
to analyse a problem accurately and to indicate step-by-step the process which was
followed to solve it. Structuring the questions in this way, the researcher was able to
determine whether the student understood the question and from that, whether the
student was able to identify the appropriate process or processes and then, by means
of a diagram whether the student could demonstrate what the particular process or
An oral test (see Appendix 7) was on the entire syllabus and the duration of each oral
test was 40 minutes. The oral test was constructed to determine the students’
understanding of certain concepts, theories and principles. They were also tested on
concepts by each student, his/her overall conceptual knowledge and problem areas
could be identified. The student was placed in the hot seat and could only rely on
his/her knowledge in the particular area under discussion. Although the oral tests were
very time-consuming, much was learnt from individual interaction through this method.
72
3.5.1.3 Summative Assessment
A summative assessment (see Appendix 8) was written on the entire syllabus and the
examination duration was 3 hours. The examination followed the same structure as the
formative assessments which allowed for the testing of factual and conceptual
A structured questionnaire (see Appendix 1) was given to the students and its duration
was 30 minutes. The questionnaire was designed to determine the students’ experience
of the GEBL approach to MTHE 2. The students could indicate what they had enjoyed
and what they found of value in terms of their learning and understanding of the
course. They also had the opportunity to indicate which aspects of the intervention they
found less helpful and where changes could be made to improve the process as well as
KPIs (see Appendices 9-11) were designed to test the extent to which the outcomes
specified for this course had been achieved and to identify the poor performances in
certain areas. The course presentations in those areas were then revisited and decisions
were then made to alter the method of presentation in an attempt to make the learning
73
process more effective. This served as a gauge of how effective the teaching and
Interviews (see Appendix 13) with duration of 20-30 minutes for each interview were
designed to gather qualitative data from the students’ experiences and on how they
experienced the process, what worked for them and why, and what did not work for
them and reasons for them. The interviews were also useful to find out which skills the
students acquired from the process and how they applied those skills in new situations.
A pilot study which was done in 2009 with the MTHE 2 group of students to establish
the need for the study. These students were exposed to the GEBL intervention for one
semester. The GEBL intervention process was the same as the one described in this
research, however no data were recorded during this intervention to determine its
questionnaire was given to them to find out what their opinions were regarding GEBL.
From the data collected there were positive responses regarding the need for such an
intervention where students could more actively get involved in the learning process
74
3.7 Instrument Reliability and Validity
This section will first describe issues around validity and reliability for quantitative data.
The trustworthiness of the qualitative data will be discussed and the measures taken to
3.7.1 Reliability
According to Carmines and Zeller (1979, p.12), “... tendency toward consistency found
equivalent results for repeated trials” (Bless, Higson-Smith & Kagee, 2006, p.150).
A reliability test was done of the instruments used in this study as a measure of internal
assessments the value was = 0.88 while it was 0.80 for the KPIs.
& Guba, 1985, p.301). Activities increasing the probability that credible finding will be
researcher was personally involved with the sample twice a week for 120 minute over a
interactions took place to guide and assist the groups during problem solving sessions
on each module of the syllabus. The quantitative assessments were all supported with
detailed memoranda, indicating the mark allocation clearly which would ensure
consistency with regard to scores. Quantitative and qualitative data were compared to
According to Ary et al. (2008, p.501), in addressing the transferability, “The researcher
must strive to provide accurate, detailed, and complete descriptions of the context and
participants to assist the reader in determining transferability”. The sample from the
Chiselhurst. In section 3.9 of this chapter the researcher gave a detailed description of
how the intervention was carried out and how the researcher was involved in the study.
opportunity to withdraw at any time and were taking part purely out of their own free
will. Data transcriptions were also made available to participants to check the accuracy
description of the research process and data collection procedure were given.
76
Confirmability can be achieved by “... in-depth methodological description to allow
3.7.3 Validity
With reference to validity, Carmines and Zeller (1979, p.17) state that “... validity, then,
measure rather than reflecting some other phenomenon”. On the issue of validity Cano
(2000, p.4) states that it, “... measures what you said you would be measuring or
explaining. It therefore deals with the appropriateness of the method to the research
question”. Ary, Jacobs, Razavieh and Sorensen (2008, p.225) explain that “... validity
measure”.
The researcher has taken the necessary steps with the development of the instruments
to ensure their validity. Assessment criteria and mark allocations were clearly indicated
There are also other terms associated with validity such as content or face validity,
“Content validity, also called 'face validity', has to do with items seeming to measure
what they claim to”. Instruments were designed to collect data on the entire MTHE 2
syllabus.
77
According to Merriam (1995, p.53), “Internal validity asks the question: how congruent
are one’s finding with reality?” Roe and Just (2009, p.3) define internal validity, “... as
the ability of a researcher to argue that observed correlations are causal”. The sample
for the purpose of this study constituted students whom voluntarily agreed to take part.
The sample also represented 50% of the accessible population. This research was
According to Thiѐtart (2001, p.198) construct validity is a measure of, “... whether the
variables used to measure the phenomenon being studied are a good representation of
it”. Detailed memorandums with mark allocations were developed for each formative
and summative assessment. The questionnaire had a Likert-type scale with five
different ratings.
Before the questionnaire was handed out to the students it was given to a professor in
the field who analysed its suitability in terms of the research questions. Feedback from
the professor was positive in terms of the suitability of the questionnaire and for
3.7.4 Triangulation
Triangulation was made use of used integrate and corroborate the qualitative data from
the interviews and the quantitative data from the questionnaires and assessments.
78
contributions in such a way as to transcend the use of specific methods in a disciplinary
sense” (Downward & Mearman, 2006, p.2). Both the formative and summative
assessments were used during the triangulation process. “... it is important for
inventories or focus groups that complement the principal measurement procedure, and
retention or passing rates in subsequent courses” (Borrego, Douglas & Amelink, 2009,
p.62).
To avoid the research bias, the insider/outsider position for interviewing the students
was decided upon. If interviews were conducted by the researcher (MTHE 2 lecturer)
there would have been an authority disposition. This could have led to students giving
answers out of fear of being judged. During the semester, a certain relationship
developed between the researcher and the students which might have affected their
responses. They might have felt that the researcher wanted to hear certain favourable
answers (whether true or false), or that the researcher would have liked to hear
positive responses with regard to the intervention, which might have led to specific
The insider position – a disadvantage of the research being conducted by someone who
qualifies as an insider is that he/she does not maintain enough distance and objectivity
79
necessary for research validity (Brannick & Coghlan, 2007, p.60). An advantage when
conducting interviews is that the, “... insider status may enhance the quality and
effectiveness of qualitative interviews” (Hodkinson, 2005, p.138). This however did not
apply in this context, because the interviewer was not part of the research and
The interviews were conducted by a part time laboratory assistant (former student)
who was busy with his B.Tech in Mechanical Engineering but had already passed
understanding MTHE 2 content. This also created a more relaxed atmosphere for the
students being interviewed by a former student and someone from the same ethnic
group. In this context the interviewer was an insider and this relationship allowed the
interviewees to behave naturally and relaxed and highly disposed to give honest
responses. Another contribution to the insider stance was that there was also no major
difference in authority.
or any vested interest (Ritchie, Zwi, Blignault, Bunde-Birouste & Silove, 2009, p.108).
According to Tinker and Armstrong (2008, p.58), “... outsider status could potentially
limit a researcher’s understanding of the material but it can also improve data analysis
by allowing him or her to maintain a sense of critical distance from the topic of
investigation”. Training was therefore done to prepare the interviewer for conducting
80
interviews and how to pose follow-up questions. Not being part of the MTHE2 group
who underwent the intervention allowed the interviewer to ask questions without
predicting what the responses could be. The interviewer’s interpretation of the
responses was from a neutral position and follow-up questions were guided by the type
of response from a particular question. In this context the interviewer was an outsider.
Lecturing was done on the first module, to introduce basic concepts and to explain the
outcomes at the end of the module to the students. An example was done by the
lecturer by writing the information given in the problem on the board and then solving
it the way he understood it and with the method most obvious to him. Most students
were completely lost during this exercise. The students were then given a problem/s to
solve on their own and the lecturer was available to assist those experiencing difficulty.
The first formative assessment (see Appendices 3 & 4) was done on module one and
the results were analysed. KPIs (see Appendices 9-11) were developed to measure the
achievement of the course outcomes on the first module (these KPIs are discussed
later). Lecturing was done on the rest of the modules with GEBL being used in problem
solving exercises. An introduction to the new course material was done to ensure that
81
the students could connect with what was about to be discussed. The introduction
normally took between 30-45 minutes of the 120 minute session. This enabled the
students to follow the explanations and discussions without being lost. By laying this
foundation, the students could then build further on it by reading reference material,
and discussing it with peers. The students were also given a booklet (see Appendix 12)
this example, a problem was given and certain unknowns had to be calculated. The
procedure was then to analyse the problem by asking questions on and about the
problem. Answers to these questions would then make the process more
understandable or would lead to other questions. Following-up on all the new questions
would eventually give answers to all the unknown information in the problem. This
would result in the student understanding the problem, as well as what is required to
be determined and the steps to follow to find a solution. The GEBL flow process is
presented below:
82
1. Lecturer introduced basic
concepts, principles and 6. Lecturer compared different
theories in MTHE 2 approaches to a solution and
Students listened and took rectified misunderstandings
notes
The purpose of the worked-out examples was not only to demonstrate the enquiry-
based approach of problem solving to the students, but also for each student who
worked through these examples to learn more about a specific topic and to show and
assist him/her to develop the ability to pose well-formulated questions and follow-up
83
questions. These questions were goal directed and were formulated to take the student
A second formative assessment was done (see Appendix 5). The results were analysed
and problem areas were identified. Corrective action was taken to address these
problems. Because these modules were so vastly different, each module required a
to the students in their attempt to identify, select and formulate questions for problems
in each of the modules. KPIs were used again to measure the extent to which the
outcomes had been achieved. A third formative assessment was done (see Appendix 6).
The results were analysed and problem areas were identified. Corrective action was
taken to address these problems. KPIs were used to test the achievement of the
outcomes. Finally an oral assessment (see Appendix 7) was done on the entire syllabus.
The purposes of the oral assessment were to hear from the students on their
out whether they actually knew what they were doing when they performed certain
calculations and what the engineering significance of the item/factor was. This detail
was not always clear from written assessments. KPIs formulated to test the
achievement of certain abilities as required by the various outcomes were applied to the
oral tests performances. A summative assessment (see Appendix 8) was written on the
entire syllabus. KPIs were used to determine the overall achievement of the course
outcomes with the final examination. At the end of the course, a structured
84
questionnaire (see Appendix 1) was handed-out to gather quantitative data from group.
Based on the outcomes and KPIs referred to in chapter two, the following KPIs were
accurately:
KPI ‘1’ measured the extent to which the student could recall information (facts,
theories, formulas), the student’s skill to analyse a problem and develop a solution
components:
KPI ‘2’ measured the extent to which the student understood the course content
each component in a plant was, which factors affected the plant operation, how and
why treatment is done and what the result would have been if the treatment was not
85
done effectively.
2:
KPI ‘3’ measured the extent to which can the student carried out discussions on course
related topics, the extent to which the student communicated fluently with his/her
KPI ‘4’ measured the extent to which the student could analyse complex problems
where certain factors were crucial and without which an optimum solution could not be
achieved. Here, the student also needed to demonstrate his/her ability to develop the
solution systematically.
The three formative assessments and the final summative assessment were designed to
test the student’s ability to analyse a problem, explain the information given and what
86
approach to find the solution. KPI numbers ‘1’ and ‘4’ were used to measure the extent
to which the outcomes for these activities had been achieved. The final oral test was
processes function and their purposes; and discuss the effects and influences on output
and performance when certain variables were altered. KPI numbers ‘2’ and ‘3’ were
used to measure the extent to which the outcomes for these activities were met.
The KPIs used a scale of 1 to 5 with full and half mark allocation as indicated in
Appendices 9-11. It is also important that the reader examines these KPIs in
3.11 Procedures
For the quantitative data collection assessment, duration varied from 30 minutes for the
structured questionnaire to 3 hours for the summative assessment. For qualitative data
the interviews took approximately 30 minute per interview. KPIs were then used to
evaluate the scores for each category (theoretical: content knowledge, explanation
values and calculate answers) to determine the overall achievement of the course
outcomes. The structured questionnaire made use of a Likert-type scale with five
different ratings. The total student responses per rating were then determined and
expressed as a percentage of the total number of students. The students’ score in the
87
formative and summative assessments were also expressed as a percentage of the total
for that particular component (i.e. ability to analyse, ability to analytically solve and
overall). The students’ interview responses were then compared to the quantitative
scores to determine whether what has been stated by the student actually occurred.
Data were collected over a period of six months from the research sample as follows:
Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) programme was used to evaluate the quantitative
data collected during this research and N-Vivo was used for the qualitative data. A
statistician was also consulted for assistance in the accurate interpretation of data.
The data were analysed to find out to what extent the research questions had been
answered. This analysis also provided information which was used to test reliability and
88
validity of this study.
3.13 Summary
Action research created the scenario for the researcher to get involved with the
assistance and support during the group sessions but also allowing the students’ to
drive their own learning processes. This design allowed for rigorous testing of students’
conceptual understanding and problems solving abilities. The instruments for this study
were the semester tests and final examination with the addition of an oral test,
structured questionnaire, KPIs and interviews. KPIs based on the outcomes for MTHE 2
were formulated. All data gathered from these instruments were quantitative and only
the data collected from the interviews were qualitative. Both types of data were used to
89
CHAPTER 4
This chapter presents the analysed data and the interpretation thereof. The
demographics of the study will first be presented, then the qualitative data, followed by
quantitative data on formative and summative assessments, quantitative data from KPIs
The sample comprised 13 males and seven females. While 19 were Xhosa speaking one
was English speaking. Students’ age ranged between 18 and 26 years (M = 21.1 years,
SD = 1.78)
90
4.2 Qualitative Data Analysis, Interpretation and Discussion
This section focuses on the qualitative data gathered during the interviews (see
Appendices 2 & 13). These interviews were done with students to find out more about
what they had learnt during the intervention and to determine what they found useful
Students’ responses (see Appendix 13) are included (verbatim) to indicate to the reader
what their opinion and experience was with regard to GEBL and their responses to the
The interview questions were categorised under the following headings with emerging
Group sessions
Communication
Active learning
Notes
Problem analysis
Understanding
91
Teaching atmosphere
With reference to the first and second research questions ‘What would be the effect of
factual recall of MTHE 2 concepts?’ and ‘What would be the effect of a guided enquiry-
emerged and the students’ responses are given under each theme beginning with the
The following themes emerged from the heading, ‘group sessions’ and ‘active learning’:
Many students found the group sessions helpful and effective in learning new work to
such an extent that they then adopted the same approach in other courses too. During
group sessions, students exchanged views and discussions took place at a level that
most students could understand and follow. Understanding the work enabled them to
solve problems in groups and also on their own. The gap between students’ reference
frameworks is much smaller than between the lecturer’s reference framework and that
of the students. The gap between students’ and lecturers’ reference frameworks can
92
lead to departure points of new work being introduced to the students that may be
above their level of understanding and as a result students can get lost from the word
go. In this regard, student A’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“Yo! Very much so! Hence I am saying that even in the other courses I am also
using it and it is really working for me. Last semester I did the same approach
Once a section of work was covered in class, the students were given homework to do
to prepare for the following lecture. Most students indicated that they did their
homework so that they could participate and explain to their peers how they had
tackled a specific problem. They also stated that if they came unprepared they would
GEBL differs from the traditional approach in the sense that more is expected from the
students attending classes. During the group sessions students had to deliver, produce
evidence of what they did, how they approached certain questions or how and why
their approach differed from those of others. Students indicated that with other
courses, not much was really expected from them from one session to another. So
whether did his/her homework and prepared for the next class was entirely up to the
93
student-nothing was there to encourage them other than just the normal talk and
chalk. In this regard, student B’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he
said:
“Because I know that I have to work at home, I have to do problems then I can
explain when with the groupmates, so I have to explain what I understand and
In this regard, student C’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“Unlike the method that we are using in other courses, you can’t actually go to
the class if you didn’t prepare because there is nothing much expected from you,
all you do is just staying in the class and listening to the lecturer”.
In this regard, student D’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“... so I have to come prepared so that I can’t be left behind so that I can work
together’.
The fact that they actually understood the work inspired students to work harder and to
learn more about the course – this gave them a sense of belonging and motivated them
to do more than just taking notes which was normally the case in other courses. In this
94
regard, student E’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when she said:
“Ja it actually involves you as a student, you know you want to do this thing
cause you understand it and you want to learn now. It gives you that positive
drive – now I want to study I want to learn not just sit in the classroom and
taking notes...”
Active participation is the main reason for the group sessions. This forced the students
to concentrate and apply their minds to what was being discussed. Sitting in a class did
not necessarily mean that the student was concentrating on what is being presented by
the lecturer. Being part of a discussion, they had to concentrate, which made these
sessions much more effective. In this regard, student I’s sentiments epitomize the
“... because group working is all about all the students participating...”
In this regard, student C’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“... because you’re going to be in group sessions and you’re going to have to
95
4.2.1.3 Group sessions allowed for explanations in mother tongue
Students who were not fluent in English also had the opportunity to explain and
participate in their mother tongue during the group sessions. These students were
therefore not excluded from the discussions which would have been the case in the
traditional teaching method where most of the time a discussion would take place
between the lecturer and the entire class. In this regard, student A’s sentiments
“So now as we were working in groups, it was well effective such that we were
well able to explain everything and maybe in Xhosa now to explain to one
another how this is, how the processes are going and then it was well
understood...”
When students did their preparation for the lecture that followed the previous one, they
would pick up the part of the work with which they struggled. During the session that
followed they asked for assistance from their peers or the lecturer. These problem
areas were then addressed and rectified upon and those students were not left behind
as the course progressed. In traditional teaching, students did not have this opportunity
and in many instances were left behind and eventually dropped out of the course. In
96
this regard, student C’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“Yes of course, because if you didn’t come to the session prepared, you wouldn’t
really know which area you need help on and which one you’re fine in...”
When students did their homework they used their group session experience and
approaches to solve new problems. The questions that they asked, served as a ‘guide’
on how to analyse problems. There was no fixed rule, but they had to systematically
work through a set of questions which they had formulated in order for them to
understand the process/processes in the problem, what information is supplied with and
how they could use that information in developing a solution to the problem. In this
regard, student C’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“Ja it helped me a lot because in group sessions before we actually tackle the
Questions like what information is given and how do I use information, what’s
the problem, where do I start in solving the problem. Those questions helped us
a lot in groups and we would use those questions even when you’re alone, the
97
The following themes emerged from the heading ‘understanding’:
Students said that they had developed the skills to read a problem and then interpret
and analyse it correctly. The fact that they discussed and listened to each others’ views
made them aware of different approaches to the same problem and that the problem
could be approached from different angles. This interaction resulted in the development
of their ability to read a problem and ask questions like: what is given? What must be
determined? What the process or processes are involved? The answers to these and
other questions were then developed in order to systematically find a solution to the
problem.
In contrast with the norm, students found it easier to actually understand certain
theories, principles and concepts. They said that GEBL assisted them in understanding
the work better than before which then also helped them in their discussions and
analysis tasks. Students stated that they really understood the work this time to such
an extent that they could explain it to others. In this regard, student C’s sentiments
98
“... when you understand the subject it becomes easy to pass it... this method
gives us that ability to understand it and not just guessing or memorizing it, but
In this regard, student A’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“So now that way of, the traditional way of teaching it is just them giving us
information and you just don’t understand, you’re just completely lost...”
Students indicated that with the other courses (traditional teaching method) there was
no opportunity for group interaction and that these interactions actually assisted them
in understanding new work by sharing ideas and explaining to one another. In this
regard, student F’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“... if it can be introduced in other courses, because you will find that in other
courses the lecturer stand in front of the class, he teaches and then he goes
out...”
99
4.2.1.8 EBL developed the ability to manipulate information to solve
problems
Responses from students indicated that they were now in a position to manipulate
information supplied in questions. They were also able to look at different approaches
to solve problems, because they actually understood the work they were dealing with.
It was no more a case of using any formula that came to mind, but using the
develop a specific approach for a solution to the problem. In this regard, student A’s
“Now I am in a position of even if they change the question around I will be well
Students expressed their satisfaction with the EBL method. EBL did not just assist them
in understanding course content but it also helped them to put the theory taught in
class in perspective with its application and the relevance in industry. Being able to link
100
what has been taught in class to a practical application made understanding of certain
concepts or processes also easier and more effective than was the case in the past. In
this regard, student A’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“... not just knowing what you calculate but what is it in the engineering field
the traditional teaching and learning method. In this regard, student A’s sentiments
“... the teachers as well, they should also create that atmosphere for us to be
In this regard, student H’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when she said:
“... sometimes I find that I don’t understand and I don’t want to ask the lecturer
can you please explain to me but if I ask in my group session and the lecturer
comes to the group session and then I ask him privately because I am a shy
person”.
101
4.2.1.10 EBL was a more effective way of learning
Responses from the interview questions indicated that students found EBL more
effective and that according to them they learned more with this method than the
traditional one. At the end of a session they understood the work better than from the
traditional approach and could analyse and solve problems more effectively than in
other courses. In this regard, student A’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views
when he said:
“Yes, all I can say it is a fact that this has really been very, very effective for me
and I believe even for the other rest of the students that we are telling”.
During group sessions every student got the opportunity to express themselves and to
share their views. This resulted in all students being actively engaged in the learning
process during these sessions. Lecturing time was reduced to allow for more time to be
spent on problem solving. This resulted in students being passive for a fraction of the
time when the lecturer was introducing a new concept. Once again students indicated
that active involvement improved learning and understanding. In this regard, student
102
“... because group working is all about all the students participating...”
In the notes there were additional questions on each section of the syllabus. This
guided the students through a process of reading the questions and studying the
research process to find out more about the topic under discussion – eventually this
leads to an expansion of the overall knowledge on the topic. In this regard, student J’s
“In the booklet we are given extra questions to be asked at the end of each
module, so basically those questions kind of push you in researching more of the
module itself”.
understanding
According to the students the manner in which the course material was presented in
the booklet (questions on theory, principles and procedures) made the content easier
for them to understand. They stated that the booklet explained the course material in
103
such a way that they could actually follow and understand it. Students also mentioned
that some of the text books were written in advanced English and that they found it
difficult to follow discussions. Being able to follow the course and understanding what
they are doing made them feel good about themselves and gave them a more positive
feeling towards MTHE 2. In this regard, student J’s sentiments epitomize the students’
“... the questions in the booklet also were very relevant to the main question
In this regard, student A’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“First of all they help you to understand the topic that you are dealing with, it
gets you to understand it much better, it elaborates everything you see. It is like
easier... Yes, it just gets you to understand that particular subject much easier –
theory
When a new section was introduced, the students had to work through the example as
well as the additional questions in the notes to gain a better understanding of the work.
104
The worked out examples in the notes showed the students how to go about analysing
a problem, how to find out what information was given and how this information could
be used to find a solution to the problem. There was a list of questions in the notes
which the students could use or alter to suit their particular situation. Working with
these questions also developed the students’ skills to formulate relevant and
appropriate questions to address specific issues. These questions were then used to
analyse problems and to get to understand problems before attempts were made to
solve them. In this regard, student K’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when
he said:
“It shows how to approach a problem and then it gives you a certain question
that you must ask in order to understand and approaching the question”.
In this regard, student F’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“Yes this booklet we have with questions and answers you read through the
theory and you read the questions and answers so that at the end of the day you
end up being aware of what you are being taught in class, what is it that the
lecturer told us about not just calculate, calculate, calculate as we are used to
105
In this regard, student I’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when she said:
In this regard, student A’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“First of all they help you to understand the topic that you are dealing with, it
The workout examples in the booklet helped the students to learn how to approach a
problem with enquiry based method. Then they applied this systematic approach when
they did the exercise questions and that helped them in their analysis and
understanding of new problems. In this regard, student L’s sentiments epitomize the
“Yes they helped me because if you are solving a problem I learned a skill that
you should ask questions, based on that question so that you can get each and
106
In this regard, student J’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“... it makes it easy and work, we had a textbook which had questions and how
to draw the diagrams and how to ask questions and what you should consider
doing first...”
The GEBL notes were aimed at making a connection between theory and practice to
improve understanding. The examples were presented in such a manner that the
students could understand the practical relevance and importance of what was being
taught. This also stimulated student interest which resulted in students’ spending more
time on that which they found interesting and enjoyed. In this regard, student F’s
“In that book, that the lecturer gave us, they offer explanation of even about
boilers, I want to learn about boilers, then I got interested to work with boilers
107
The following themes emerged from the heading ‘problem analysis’:
When the students were given new problems to solve, the process was that they had to
write down individually some question which they felt could help them in analysing the
problem. These questions were then discussed in the group and later in the class in
general to compare the similarity of questions formulated between the groups. This was
basically the approach during all the sessions and that gave the students a certain
departure point when they faced a new problem. They then worked systematically
through the questions and once all the questions were answered they would be in a
position to develop the solution to the problem. In this regard, student C’s sentiments
“We were encouraged to write down a certain sequence of each question and
how to answer the question and we were given time before each problem to
evaluate how we were going to actually answer the question, not just looking at
the question and trying to answer that specific question, cause you have to find
a number of things before you answer the actual question that’s asked... before
we actually tackle the problem we would have a list of certain questions that we
ask to ourselves”.
108
In this regard, student J’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“... to know which step you should move to and how you should approach the
At the end of the module, students had to become capable of solving problems without
relying on their peers. This approach to problem solving where they had to pose a
number of questions to which they had to find answers were then also used very
effectively by individual students when they did their home work. In this regard,
student E’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when she said:
“... when you are at your own, doing homework or something you know how to
tackle a question, how to start from the beginning – you know how to solve
In this regard, student H’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when she said:
“... when we solve problems as a group session, there’s a rule then, and then
109
4.2.1.19 Peers’ problem solving approaches
Sharing problem solving approaches with peers in the group made students aware that
there could be more than one approach to solving a problem and that they should
always bear in mind possibilities of different approaches. Being aware that a problem
could be analysed and solved from different angles enabled students to consider the
given information in the problem first, before they started to plan a specific approach.
In this regard, student K’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“I enjoyed working with other students and to see how other students are
approaching the sum... you learn a lot of skills in approaching the sum because
you are dealing with different people with different styles of approaching the
sum...”
In this regard, student I’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when she said:
“... in groups you know you get more information because all of us we come up
110
The following themes emerged from the heading ‘understanding’:
understanding
Students stated that they have realised if they understood a section of the work
properly and they had to solve a problem under that particular section, they could use
given information and formulas gave them the freedom to solve problems in more than
one way. In this regard, student K’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he
said:
ways... so you have the ability to analyse the question and explore others ways
In addressing the third research question ‘What would be the effect of a guided
communicate procedures and processes related to MTHE 2?’ the following themes
111
4.2.2.1 Group sessions assisted communication with strangers
During discussions in their groups students were given the opportunity to speak in
English, expressing their views and understandings. They also had to listen to their
English proficiency as they were part of the discussion and they were exposed to how
others expressed themselves as well as new terms and new words that were used.
During group sessions the students were rotated which also exposed the students to an
exercise where they had to communicate with strangers. In this regard, student C’s
“In the group we had to first raise your suggestion in approaching the problem...
first had to like explain how do you understand the problem and you can
establish where you can start in trying to solve the problem and we would do
Students had their own ideas when it came to problem solving and these ideas they
problem they debated their differences and had to convince their peers that their
approach is the correct one based on facts. This placed further pressure on the
112
students to come prepared to class and to have their facts ready during these
discussions. These discussions could not be convincing if students only memorised the
work, but they really had to understand it to be able to present a convincing argument.
In this regard, student C’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“Everyone in the group would come with their own ideas... You know in
each other in the groups someone gets to be disagreeing with you in the group
and you will have to try to convince and explain to him exactly how you really
view this...”
In this regard, student N’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when she said:
“... we communicate about the question and if someone does not understand the
Students indicated that they not only learned content but were also developed in other
areas. They were encouraged to participate in group discussions with strangers which in
turn gave them confidence to express themselves in front of other people. This is an
important skill in the engineering field and if the students’ communication skills can be
113
developed to its full potential it will only be to their benefit. In this regard, student L’s
“I think in this method you gain a lot of skill other than solving the problem, first
because you have to solve problems with other people in the class... I think this
chance to solve the problem, but you can gain other skills other than solving
problems like talking in front of the people because in Thermo you have to share
discussions they learned to use Thermodynamic terms which resulted in them becoming
more familiar with these terms which in turn helped them in understanding the course
content and problems better and this they would not have done when working alone.
Talking about various Thermodynamic aspects in group discussions, they had to say out
the terms loud, and this helped them in improving their pronunciation of these terms. It
because now they were able to use the terminology correctly. In this regard, student
114
“In Thermodynamics there are a number of terms and well just terms you need
to know that you don’t really pick up if you do work without talking about the
work. So the fact that you were talking about the work helped you to understand
When students explained problems to their peers and communicated in the group
sessions, they felt that communication skills improved and their language proficiency
actually improved. They indicated that they learned new words and that their ability to
express themselves improved. This would not have been the case with the traditional
teaching method. In this regard, student K’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views
when he said:
“It helped develop our communication skills because you get to speak out,
Communicating with their class mates during the problem solving sessions, created the
opportunity to share their views which helped them in their understanding and
strategies to analyse and solve problems. These group sessions developed multiple
skills of students i.e. problem solving skills, communications skills and confidence to
115
express themselves in front of strangers. In this regard, student K’s sentiments
In this regard, student F’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“When you are working in a group you gain something and you give something
to the others, you get some ideas how to tackle the problem...”
For all students except one, English was not the mother tongue. All these students
indicated that taking part in group session discussions helped them develop their
be able to express oneself in technical areas, and be able to explain and demonstrate
certain processes effectively. In this regard, student B’s sentiments epitomize the
116
“Because I have to talk to others and they must talk to me too. When doing this
communicate”.
In this regard, student H’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when she said:
speak with another and it helped me a lot because now I know that I can explain
In the traditional teaching method, the lecturer posed a question to the class or to an
individual who would simply respond ‘I don’t know.’ This made it difficult for the
lecturer to determine whether the student understood the work but was just shy or
whether he/she really did not understand the work. With the group sessions they could
speak freely to their peers and ask questions if they did not understand something.
Those with more confidence would then call the lecturer for further help if needed. In
this regard, student J’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
117
“Yes, discussing in the groups – firstly it is not like answering your lecturer so
In this regard, student A’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“I think the lecturer was able to make the environment free. He made the
environment so free that you were so more able to ask questions anyhow and at
anytime...”
Comparing the classroom atmosphere between the traditional lecturing method and
GEBL method, students stated that they felt much more relaxed and free to participate,
ask questions to peers and the lecturer and to give their views to their peers. The
learning environment created with the GEBL approach was more student-friendly and
students could concentrate on learning and gaining knowledge. In this regard, student
“You just don’t have that platform, you are not free at all, you are afraid of the
other students, you are afraid, but this way, I am more free you see. I think the
lecturer was able to make the environment free. He made the environment so
free that you were so more able to ask questions anyhow and at any time...”
118
In this regard, student J’s sentiments epitomize the students’ views when he said:
“... now you are feeling relaxed and analyse what is in front of you...”
From the qualitative data presented in section 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 and their subsections,
there is indication that students found that GEBL assisted them in learning factual
solving skills were also developed following the GEBL approach to analyse problems.
Their ability to communicate and to use MTHE 2 terms in groups was developed during
This section deals with quantitative data recorded with the relevant instruments
developed for this study. The mean is the sum of the values divided by the number of
real-valued random variable. When the skewness value is negative the Bell-curve will lie
more to the right and the bulk of the values will lie to the right of the mean. The curve
will also have a longer tail on the left side caused by low number extreme cases. A
positive skew indicates that the tail on the right side is longer than the left side and the
119
bulk of the values lie to the left of the mean. A zero value for skewness indicates that
the values are relatively evenly distributed on both sides of the mean. The curve will
have a symmetrical shape around the mean. Low values will be those below 40% and
With reference to the first research question ‘What would be the effect of a guided
recall of MTHE 2 concepts?’ and the second research question: ‘What would be the
and differences which occurred during the assessments. With regard to the tests and
final examination, all the lowest scored questions and all the highest scored questions
are presented and discussed. The overall performance of each test is highlighted and
discussed. Possible causes for poor the performance in certain questions are discussed.
Following this, suggestions to rectify the poorly performed section are made and
120
Overall descriptive statistics
Statistics
T1 T1B T2 T3 FINALEXAM
N Valid 20 20 20 20 20
Missing 0 0 0 0 0
/Mean 46.2000 46.2000 42.4000 41.5505 48.6005
Standard. Error of Mean 3.52331 3.62782 1.77319 4.27973 4.76109
Median 45.5000 47.0000 43.5000 46.0000 55.5000
Mode 46.00a 45.00a 47.00 46.00a 58.00
Standard. Deviation 15.75670 16.22409 7.92996 19.13954 21.29224
Variance 248.274 263.221 62.884 366.322 453.359
Skewness .168 -.582 -.614 -.338 -.791
Standard. Error of Skewness .512 .512 .512 .512 .512
Kurtosis -1.111 .704 .243 .034 .316
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992 .992 .992 .992 .992
Range 52.00 65.00 30.00 77.99 84.99
Minimum 20.00 8.00 25.00 .01 .01
Maximum 72.00 73.00 55.00 78.00 85.00
Sum 924.00 924.00 848.00 831.01 972.01
Test 2 had the lowest median (the middle value of all the results) of 43.5 with the final
examination showing the highest median of 55.5. The skewness of the histograms
shifted progressively from Test 1 to the Final Examination more to the right resulting in
here was Test 3 which had a skewness of -0.338 which indicated a low number of
extreme cases below the mean (the average of all the results). This can be attributed to
progressed even with larger volumes of work and increased degrees of difficulty.
121
Traditional teaching and learning methods were used to present the first module which
was covered in Test 1 and Test 1b. Low and high overall scores will be discussed and
possible cause and reasons for these low and high overall scores will be explained:
Statistics
N Valid 20 20 20 20 20 20
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 51.500 20.000 7.500 46.250 63.350 35.000
Standard. Error of Mean 5.5930 6.6886 3.1933 8.9360 3.6240 6.3867
Median 43.000 .000 .000 50.000 73.000 50.000
-Mode 43.0 .0 .0 .0 73.0 50.0
Standard. Deviation 25.0126 29.9122 14.2810 39.9630 16.2068 28.5620
Variance 625.632 894.737 203.947 1597.039 262.661 815.789
Skewness .370 1.041 1.845 .185 -1.523 .038
Standard. Error of Skewness .512 .512 .512 .512 .512 .512
Kurtosis .312 -.655 2.861 -1.524 1.950 -.395
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992 .992 .992 .992 .992 .992
Range 100.0 75.0 50.0 100.0 64.0 100.0
Minimum .0 .0 .0 .0 18.0 .0
Maximum 100.0 75.0 50.0 100.0 82.0 100.0
Sum 1030.0 400.0 150.0 925.0 1267.0 700.0
122
Figure 4.1: Theory Question 1.3 in Test 1 reflecting a low level of Conceptual
Knowledge
In this question students had to explain their understanding of the gas constant. Many
of the students answered the question by giving a formula in terms of specific heat
capacities. This was mainly an interpretation error of what they had to do although
clear instructions were given to them prior to the commencement of the test. It can
also be mentioned that the relationships between gas constant and specific heat
capacities given by the students were in general correct although this was not asked.
The majority of the students interpreted the questions incorrectly and the mode (the
result most often recorded) was 0%. Question 1.3 had the lowest mean of 7.5 and the
123
highest positive skewness of 1.845. The low number extreme outliers (above or below
This question required the students to analyse the problem, explain which processes
were involved, which variables remained constant and which ones changed. They then
had to draw the pressure-volume diagram of the complete process. Most of the
students were able to analyse the problem correctly. They were also able to indicate
which variables remained constant and which ones changed and could reflect the
section of the work was of a high standard which enabled them to give the correct
124
response. Question 2.1 had the highest mean of 63.35 and highest negative skewness
of -1.523. The low number extreme cases pushed the standard deviation up to 16.207.
However, the central tendency (median) was 73% and the score that was recorded
Statistics
N Valid 20 20 20
Missing 0 0 0
Mean 32.450 62.500 55.400
Standard. Error of Mean 6.5476 10.1793 7.8464
Median 25.000 100.000 50.000
Mode .0 100.0 100.0
Standard. Deviation 29.2817 45.5233 35.0900
Variance 857.418 2072.368 1231.305
Skewness .207 -.552 .108
Standard. Error of Skewness .512 .512 .512
Kurtosis -1.470 -1.632 -1.435
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992 .992 .992
Range 75.0 100.0 94.0
Minimum .0 .0 6.0
Maximum 75.0 100.0 100.0
Sum 649.0 1250.0 1108.0
125
Figure 4.3: Analytical Question 1.2 in Test 1 reflecting a low level of Factual
and Conceptual Knowledge
In this question, the students had to calculate the specific heat capacity of the gas in
the problem. Most of the errors occurred due to the incorrect approach to the solution
properties of air and applied it to an unknown gas which enabled them to use another
formula which would have had too many unknowns had they substituted correct data
for this gas. Some of the students used the wrong formula to determine the unknowns
by also assuming standard values for air which could not be applied to the gas in
question. The central tendency was 25% and the score most often recorded was 0%.
More attention must be given to this section emphasizing the fact that each gas has its
126
own unique properties and that these properties cannot be mixed up. Question 1.2 had
the lowest mean of 32.45, the lowest standard deviation of 29.2817 and the second
Figure 4.4: Analytical Question 1.3 in Test 1 reflecting a high level of Factual
Knowledge
In this question most students understood what needed to be determined and they
selected the correct formula to determine the answer. Here, the students were required
to tap into their memory and retrieve the correct formula taking into account the
information supplied in the problem and the variables available. The central tendency as
well as the score recorded most frequently was 100%. The data indicated that the
127
knowledge level of students varied from very low to high and that only a few students
could not solve the problem. Question 1.3 had the highest mean of 62.5, the highest
Statistics
TOTAL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 46.200
Standard. Error of Mean 3.5233
Median 45.500
Mode 46.0a
Standard. Deviation 15.7567
Variance 248.274
Skewness .168
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis -1.111
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 52.0
Minimum 20.0
Maximum 72.0
Sum 924.0
128
Figure 4.5: Overall Performance in Test 1 with a combined Factual and
Conceptual Knowledge achievement of 46.2%
From the data, 68% of the students scored between 30.443% and 61.775%. The
standard deviation is clearly influenced by the extreme cases in the tail on the right of
the histogram. The diagram has also small tails which explain the low values for the
kurtosis and the skewness. The positive skewness indicated that more students had
lower scores than higher scores for this assessment. The score most frequently
recorded was 46% which is 0.2% less than the mean score.
129
Data from Test 1b Theory Questions:
Statistics
N Valid 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 47.700 94.350 27.500 2.000 44.700 6.000 16.500
Standard. Error of Mean 6.5386 2.9888 4.4054 2.0000 4.8678 2.5547 3.6473
Median 50.000 100.000 25.000 .000 40.000 .000 20.000
Mode 25.0 100.0 25.0 .0 33.0 .0 .0a
Standard. Deviation 29.2415 13.3664 19.7017 8.9443 21.7694 11.4248 16.3111
Variance 855.063 178.661 388.158 80.000 473.905 130.526 266.053
Skewness -.117 -3.307 -.186 4.472 1.217 1.845 .552
Standard. Error of Skewness .512 .512 .512 .512 .512 .512 .512
Kurtosis -1.278 12.275 -1.308 20.000 .649 2.861 -.714
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992 .992 .992 .992 .992 .992 .992
Range 88.0 57.0 50.0 40.0 73.0 40.0 50.0
Minimum .0 43.0 .0 .0 20.0 .0 .0
Maximum 88.0 100.0 50.0 40.0 93.0 40.0 50.0
Sum 954.0 1887.0 550.0 40.0 894.0 120.0 330.0
130
Figure 4.6: Theory Question 1.2 in Test 1b reflecting a high level of
Conceptual Knowledge
In this question the students were required to draw a pressure-volume diagram of the
processes involved was necessary as well as the ability to reflect the data on this
diagram correctly. Most students were able to answer this question correctly with only
certain individuals giving incorrect responses. Question 1.2 had the highest mean of
94.35, the third lowest standard deviation of 13.3664 and the highest negative
skewness of -3.307.
131
Figure 4.7: Theory Question 1.4 in Test 1b reflecting a low level of
Conceptual Knowledge
This question consisted of three processes with process one followed by process two
and process two followed by process three. The question required from the students to
relationship between two points. This would enable them to explain the process
between the two points and how the heat flow in this process would be determined.
However, to be able to give a correct response, a correct interpretation of the first two
processes had to be made. From the data it became clear that very few of them had
the correct understanding of what the process was and therefore could not give the
132
correct answer. The class as a whole scored low marks thus causing the skewness
leaning toward the left in the lower percentages. A possible cause could be the
type of process involved in this question. More detailed exercises on this particular type
of approach could assist in handling similar problems. Question 1.4 had the lowest
mean of 2.0, the lowest standard deviation of 8.9443 and the highest positive skewness
of 4.472.
Statistics
N Valid 20 20 20 20
Missing 0 0 0 0
Mean 76.550 .000 70.000 46.400
Standard. Error of Mean 7.4549 .0000 5.3311 7.4690
Median 92.000 .000 80.000 43.000
Mode 100.0 .0 80.0 43.0
Standard. Deviation 33.3395 .0000 23.8416 33.4025
Variance 1111.524 .000 568.421 1115.726
Skewness -1.438 -1.553 .148
Standard. Error of Skewness .512 .512 .512 .512
Kurtosis .819 2.766 -.929
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992 .992 .992 .992
Range 100.0 .0 100.0 100.0
Minimum .0 .0 .0 .0
Maximum 100.0 .0 100.0 100.0
Sum 1531.0 .0 1400.0 928.0
133
Figure 4.8: Analytical Question 1.3 in Test 1b reflecting a high level of
Factual and Conceptual Knowledge
This question required the students to calculate the total heat flow for the complete
process. To be able to answer this question correctly, the students had to understand
what was meant by the term total heat flow and then they had to recall the correct
formula. Most of the students understood what total heat flow was and recalled the
correct formula. Question 1.3 had the highest mean of 76.55, the second highest
134
Figure 4.9: Analytical Question 1.4 in Test 1b reflecting a low level of Factual
and Conceptual Knowledge
All students scored zero for this question which explained the poor data. In this
question, the students needed an understanding of the process in question and which
variables (in this case pressure and temperature) would pose a danger to the device
and people. Very few students had a practical experience with this device and had
therefore to rely on their understanding and interpretation of the theory which they
inappropriate formulas. It became clear that more attention needed to be given to this
135
demonstrate the process from the initial point to the final position and then a return to
the original condition. A laboratory experiment would also allow for active participation
and group discussions for the students. Question 1.4 had the lowest mean of 0, the
Statistics
TOTAL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 46.200
Standard. Error of Mean 3.6278
Median 47.000
Mode 45.0a
Standard. Deviation 16.2241
Variance 263.221
Skewness -.582
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis .704
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 65.0
Minimum 8.0
Maximum 73.0
Sum 924.0
136
Figure 4.10: Overall Performance in Test 1 with a combined Factual and
Conceptual Knowledge achievement of 46.2%
The standard deviation indicated that 68% of the students scored between 29.976%
and 62.424%. In this case the standard deviation was influenced by the lower extreme
cases as indicated by the tail on the left. The central tendency in this case was 47%
which was not affected by these low number extreme cases. The low value for the
skewness and kurtosis was as a result of the small tails. The negative skewness
indicated that more students scored higher values than lower values. The most frequent
score obtained by the students was 45%, very close to the mean of 46.2%. In this
137
question the majority of the students scored above 40% with only certain individuals
GEBL was introduced and used for the remainder of the syllabus (modules 2-7). Low
and high scores will be discussed and possible reasons for the performance will be
important to draw the readers’ attention again to the fact that Test 2 was written on
four times more work (2 complete modules) than Test 1 and 1b (0.5 module each). The
138
Data from Test 2 Theory Questions:
Statistics
139
Figure 4.11: Theory Question in Test 2 reflecting a low level of Conceptual
Knowledge
The question required from the students to explain the type of process in the question
bearing in mind all the information given. All students except one gave an incorrect
response. The majority of these responses were explaining the process which they had
to follow in answering the sub-questions posed, but did not answer sub-question in this
particular case. A possible cause of this could be the misinterpretation of the question.
reworded so that it became clear regarding what was expected from the students.
Question 2.1 had the lowest mean of 5 and the highest positive skewness of 4.472.
140
Figure 4.12: Theory Question 2.3 in Test 2 reflecting a high level of
Conceptual Knowledge
In this question the students had to explain all the calculations which they had to
perform before they could do a volumetric analysis. The majority of the students gave
the correct answer showing that the group’s conceptual knowledge of this section of the
work was satisfactorily and that they used this to formulate their answers. Question 2.3
had the highest mean of 77 and the highest negative skewness of -1.103.
141
Data from Test 2 Analytical Questions:
Statistics
N Valid 20 20 20 20
Missing 0 0 0 0
Mean 30.000 5.000 84.150 31.450
Standard. Error of Mean 9.8675 3.4412 4.9843 3.6088
Median .000 .000 91.000 27.000
Mode .0 .0 100.0 46.0
Standard. Deviation 44.1290 15.3897 22.2906 16.1391
Variance 1947.368 236.842 496.871 260.471
Skewness .939 2.888 -1.994 .397
Standard. Error of Skewness .512 .512 .512 .512
Kurtosis -1.046 7.037 3.839 -.690
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992 .992 .992 .992
Range 100.0 50.0 82.0 59.0
Minimum .0 .0 18.0 8.0
Maximum 100.0 50.0 100.0 67.0
Sum 600.0 100.0 1683.0 629.0
142
Figure 4.13: Analytical Question in Test 2 reflecting a low level of Factual
and Conceptual Knowledge
This question required the students to calculate the temperature at exit from the
compressor. Here, the students had to understand the process in and through the
compressor as well as the given information and how the given information could be
used to determine the temperature at exit. Except for two students, everybody gave the
wrong answer. Most of the students did not realise that the working fluid was air and
that standard properties could be used (not supplied in the question). Without these
properties, the question could not have been answered because the relevant formulae
would render too many unknowns. Possible means of overcoming this inability on the
143
student’s side would be to emphasise to the students the use of a systematic approach
in developing a solution, with the first step being to identify the working fluid. Question
1.4 had the lowest mean of 5.0 and the highest positive skewness of 2.888.
This question required the students to perform the calculations which they had listed in
Question 2.3. Question 2.3 was a theory question and the students had a very high
score for it which obviously resulted in the high score for Question 2.4. Here, the
students demonstrated their ability to physically perform the calculations which they
explained in the previous question. Question 2.4 had highest mean of 84.15 and the
144
highest negative skewness of -1.994. The small number of outliers between 0% and
Statistics
TOTAL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 42.400
Standard. Error of Mean 1.7732
Median 43.500
Mode 47.0
Standard. Deviation 7.9300
Variance 62.884
Skewness -.614
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis .243
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 30.0
Minimum 25.0
Maximum 55.0
Sum 848.0
145
Figure 4.15: Overall Performance in Test 2 reflecting a combined Factual and
Conceptual Knowledge of 42.2%
Data for the overall performance in Question 2 indicated that 68% of the students
scored between 34.47% and 50.33%. The small tails in the histogram explain the low
values for the kurtosis and skewness. The median in this case is 43.5% with a
skewness of -0.614 which meant that this was the central tendency of the scores and
the score most frequently obtained by the students was 47% which was 5.4% higher
than the mean. The negative skewness indicated more high scores than lower scores
146
The performance in Test 3 must be observed bearing in mind the fact that this test was
written on 3 modules of work which had six times more content than Test 1 and 1b and
also one module more than Test 2. The modules were still progressively becoming more
147
Data Test 3 Theory Questions:
Statistics
T2.2. T2.2.
T1.1 T1.2 T1.3 T1.4 T1.5 T2.1 1 2 T2.3 T3.1 T3.2 T3.3 T4.1 T4.2 T4.3 T4.4 T4.5
N Vali 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19
d
Miss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ing
Mean 67.1 35.26 60.5 13.1 31.5 22.6 43.42 39.47 57.89 22.0 55.47 28.0 73.05 62.15 32.89 28.94 7.89
05 3 26 58 79 32 1 4 5 53 4 53 3 8 5 7 5
Stand 6.90 8.284 6.70 5.18 6.85 5.28 7.845 7.481 10.99 7.23 7.301 6.40 8.668 8.340 8.122 7.709 3.84
ard. 70 7 92 95 11 94 9 9 12 11 5 43 2 8 9 8 87
Error
of
Mean
Media 50.0 40.00 75.0 .000 25.0 20.0 50.00 50.00 100.0 .000 63.00 33.0 100.0 83.00 25.00 25.00 .000
n 00 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 0 0
Mode 50.0 .0 75.0 .0 .0a .0 .0a 50.0 100.0 .0 63.0 .0 100.0 83.0a .0 .0 .0
Stand 30.1 36.11 29.2 22.6 29.8 23.0 34.19 32.61 47.90 31.5 31.82 27.9 37.78 36.35 35.40 33.60 16.7
ard. 070 22 449 207 632 560 93 28 95 198 66 155 37 67 70 63 760
Deviat
ion
Varian 906. 1304. 855. 511. 891. 531. 1169. 1063. 2295. 993. 1012. 779. 1427. 1321. 1253. 1129. 281.
ce 433 094 263 696 813 579 591 596 322 497 930 275 608 807 655 386 433
Skewn - .470 - 1.17 .524 .826 .096 .227 -.346 1.30 -.410 .341 - -.623 .682 .908 1.99
ess .379 .719 0 9 1.142 8
Stand .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524
ard.
Error
of
Skewn
ess
Kurtos - - .257 - - - - -.613 - .526 -.403 - -.066 -.988 -.780 -.015 2.81
is .521 1.116 .718 .329 .098 1.156 1.952 1.46 1
9
Stand 1.01 1.014 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.01 1.014 1.01 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.01
ard. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Error
of
Kurtos
is
Range 100. 100.0 100. 50.0 100. 70.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100. 100.0 67.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0
0 0 0 0
Minim .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
um
Maxim 100. 100.0 100. 50.0 100. 70.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100. 100.0 67.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0
um 0 0 0 0
Sum 127 670.0 115 250. 600. 430. 825.0 750.0 1100. 419. 1054. 533. 1388. 1181. 625.0 550.0 150.
5.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown
148
Figure 4.16: Theory Question 4.1 in Test 3 reflecting a high level of
Conceptual Knowledge
This question required the students to draw a flow diagram of the Rankine cycle. Here,
the students had to use their conceptual knowledge of the operation of the Rankine
cycle and all the components it consisted of as well as the relationship between the
various components within the plant. The standard deviation was increased by the
outliers and the highest concentration of scores was in the upper limits. The majority of
the students had a good understanding of this section and could give a correct
response. The central tendency for this question and the score most frequently
149
recorded was 100%. Question 4.1 had the highest mean of 73.05 and the highest
This question required the students to explain their understanding of the brake thermal
efficiency of the Rankine cycle and what exactly it measured. From the data it was clear
that not many students had a proper understanding of what the brake thermal
efficiency was or what it was used for. A possible strategy to rectify this would be to
spend more time on this particular section during problem solving sessions and to
present students with more problems which incorporate the brake thermal efficiency.
150
Question 4.5 had the lowest mean of 7.89 and the highest positive skewness of 1.998.
Statistics
C1.3 C1.4 C1.5 C2.2.1 C2.2.2 C2.3 C3.3 C4.3 C4.4 C4.5
N Valid 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 26.368 8.789 11.474 67.105 61.474 76.316 89.421 68.368 46.053 10.000
Standard. 5.8715 5.0144 4.5917 7.6598 9.6325 7.0175 4.2270 10.0374 9.6092 3.4918
Error of
Mean
Median 17.000 .000 .000 75.000 67.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 50.000 .000
Mode 17.0 .0 .0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 .0 .0
Standard. 25.5934 21.8571 20.0149 33.3881 41.9873 30.5888 18.4250 43.7521 41.8854 15.2206
Deviation
Variance 655.023 477.731 400.596 1114.766 1762.930 935.673 339.480 1914.246 1754.386 231.667
Skewness 1.320 2.366 2.790 -.599 -.609 -.924 -1.251 -.765 .119 .902
Standard. .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524 .524
Error of
Skewness
Kurtosis 2.416 4.385 9.284 -.998 -1.334 .038 -.402 -1.369 -1.671 -1.289
Standard. 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.014 1.014
Error of
Kurtosis
Range 100.0 67.0 83.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 43.0 100.0 100.0 33.0
Minimum .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 57.0 .0 .0 .0
Maximum 100.0 67.0 83.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 33.0
Sum 501.0 167.0 218.0 1275.0 1168.0 1450.0 1699.0 1299.0 875.0 190.0
151
Figure 4.18: Analytical Question 1.4 in Test 3 reflecting a low level of Factual
and Conceptual Knowledge
This question required the students to determine the percentage of heat that was
converted into work done. To be able to answer this question correctly, the students
had to have an understanding of the relationship between heat, work done and change
in internal energy. This was a case of conceptual understanding and factual recall of the
specific formula. From the data it is clear that most students could not answer this
question correctly. The central tendency in this case was 0% with the score that was
recorded most frequently also at 0%. The low number of extreme cases pushed the
cause was the misinterpretation of the question. Some of the students could give the
152
formula correctly but could not perform the percentage calculation. It was not that they
did not know how to do it but they were definitely not aware that this was what had to
possible misunderstandings. Question 1.4 had the lowest mean of 8.79 and the second
This question required the students to determine the degree of dryness in a steam
pipeline. The standard deviation was increased by the outliers and the central tendency
153
as well as the score recorded most often was 100%. Here the students demonstrated
their ability to correctly interpret the question and also to recall the formulas correctly
for this section of the work. Question 3.3 had the highest mean of 89.42 and the
Statistics
TOTAL
N Valid 19
Missing 0
Mean 43.737
Standard. Error of Mean 3.8781
Median 46.000
Mode 46.0a
Standard. Deviation 16.9044
Variance 285.760
Skewness -.035
Standard. Error of Skewness .524
Kurtosis -.212
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.014
Range 62.0
Minimum 16.0
Maximum 78.0
Sum 831.0
154
Figure 4.20: Overall Performance in Test 3 reflecting a combined Factual and
Conceptual Knowledge 43.74%
The data indicated that 68% of the students scored between 26.836% and 60.644%.
The small number of outliers pushed the standard deviation up to 16.904, however the
central tendency for the scores was 46% regardless of a small number of high values
that were recorded between 50% and 60%. The small tails gave low values for
skewness. The small negative skewness of -0.35 indicated that only a few more
students obtained higher scores than those whom obtained lower scores.
155
Data from Final Examination Theory Questions:
Statistics
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9
N Valid 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 32.493 42.133 50.000 56.733 57.333 32.800 65.133 34.667 6.667
Standard. Error of 7.9737 9.1879 11.9523 5.1533 8.0750 8.5106 7.3672 6.8914 2.9547
Mean
Median 30.000 33.000 50.000 67.000 60.000 33.000 72.000 40.000 .000
Mode .1a .0a .0a 67.0 30.0a .0 72.0 .0a .0
Standard. Deviation 30.8820 35.5846 46.2910 19.9588 31.2745 32.9614 28.5329 26.6905 11.4434
Variance 953.699 1266.267 2142.857 398.352 978.095 1086.457 814.124 712.381 130.952
Skewness .503 .514 .000 .233 -.184 .495 -1.196 -.061 1.176
Standard. Error of .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580
Skewness
Kurtosis -1.045 -.597 -1.974 -.181 -1.046 -1.053 .892 -1.226 -.734
Standard. Error of 1.121 1.121 1.121 1.121 1.121 1.121 1.121 1.121 1.121
Kurtosis
Range 90.0 100.0 100.0 67.0 100.0 92.0 100.0 80.0 25.0
Minimum .0 .0 .0 33.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
Maximum 90.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 92.0 100.0 80.0 25.0
Sum 487.4 632.0 750.0 851.0 860.0 492.0 977.0 520.0 100.0
156
Figure 4.21: Theory Question 7 in the Final Examination reflecting a high
level of Conceptual Knowledge
This question required the students to complete an attached diagram and fill in all the
relevant detail. The students needed their conceptual knowledge (recalling the detailed
diagram that were presented to them in the notes) of this particular section to complete
the diagram of the wet and dry air pumps. In this question only three students scored
below 40% with the rest achieving a score above 60%. The outliers in the lower
percentages pushed the standard deviation up to 28.533. The central tendency in this
case was 72% and the score recorded most frequently was also 72%. A satisfactory
157
Question 7 had the highest mean of 65.13 and the highest negative skewness of -
1.196.
Figure 4.22: Theory Question 9 from the Final Examination reflecting a low
level of Conceptual Knowledge
This question required the students to explain what the products of combustion will be
with insufficient air supplied and how the heat released during combustion will be
the effects of too much and too little air supplied were discussed. The students had to
have a proper understanding of the conceptual process and knowledge and ability to
use the information to determine what result, the insufficient air supply would cause.
158
Only four students had an idea, although vague, regarding what was required from
them. In future, more time must be spent on discussing non-standard conditions which
was not normal or ideal so that the students could develop the ability to think outside of
the box, manipulating the knowledge which they had with respect to the ideal
conditions. This can be assisted through big group or small group discussions or even a
group assignment. Question 9 had the lowest mean of 6.67 and the highest positive
skewness of 1.176.
159
Data from Final Examination Analytical Questions:
Statistics
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 C16
N Vali 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
d
Miss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ing
Mean 42.00 52.00 22.66 3.33 89.2 74.46 6.66 83.3 66.66 80.00 31.0 15.53 44.6 53.33 79.40 65.66
0 0 7 3 67 7 7 33 7 0 00 3 67 3 0 7
Standa 11.43 8.462 9.127 3.33 4.54 9.608 6.66 7.96 8.333 9.511 7.61 9.120 7.85 13.33 8.175 8.658
rd. 10 8 0 33 03 5 67 82 3 9 76 8 99 33 9 4
Error
of
Mean
Media 50.00 60.00 .000 .000 100. 100.0 .000 100. 50.00 100.0 33.0 .000 50.0 100.0 100.0 70.00
n 0 0 000 00 000 0 00 00 00 00 00 0
Mode .0 40.0a .0 .0 100. 100.0 .0 100. 50.0a 100.0 33.0 .0 50.0a 100.0 100.0 100.0
0 0
Standa 44.27 32.77 35.34 12.9 17.5 37.21 25.8 30.8 32.27 36.83 29.5 35.32 30.4 51.63 31.66 33.53
rd. 19 63 86 099 844 34 199 607 49 94 030 48 412 98 52 39
Deviati
on
Varian 1960. 1074. 1249. 166. 309. 1384. 666. 952. 1041. 1357. 870. 1247. 926. 2666. 1002. 1124.
ce 000 286 524 667 210 838 667 381 667 143 429 838 667 667 686 524
Skewn .302 -.148 1.380 3.87 - - 3.87 - -.426 - .876 2.179 .327 -.149 - -.590
ess 3 1.71 1.220 3 1.79 1.632 1.486
1 2
Standa .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580 .580
rd.
Error
of
Skewn
ess
Kurtosi - -.984 .443 15.0 1.88 .164 15.0 2.62 -.666 1.320 .675 3.471 - - 1.422 -.742
s 1.791 00 1 00 5 .091 2.308
Standa 1.121 1.121 1.121 1.12 1.12 1.121 1.12 1.12 1.121 1.121 1.12 1.121 1.12 1.121 1.121 1.121
rd. 1 1 1 1 1 1
Error
of
Kurtosi
s
Range 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 50.0 100.0 100. 100. 100.0 100.0 100. 100.0 100. 100.0 100.0 100.0
0 0 0 0
Minim .0 .0 .0 .0 50.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
um
Maxim 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 100. 100.0 100. 100. 100.0 100.0 100. 100.0 100. 100.0 100.0 100.0
um 0 0 0 0 0
Sum 630.0 780.0 340.0 50.0 1339 1117. 100. 1250 1000. 1200. 465. 233.0 670. 800.0 1191. 985.0
.0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown
160
Figure 4.23: Analytical Question 4 in the Final Examination reflecting a low
level of Factual and Conceptual Knowledge
This question required the students to determine the overall change in enthalpy of the
gas. The students had to use both their factual and conceptual knowledge of this
section of the work in order for them to be able to give the correct answer. They had to
understand the complete process as well as the relationship between initial and final
enthalpy of the gas. Only one student scored 50% and the rest obtained a score of 0%.
These results indicated a definite lack of knowledge in this particular area and in the
future, problem solving group sessions would have to concentrate more on this.
Students must also be made aware of the fact that they must look at specific details
161
when they dealt with a problem, and should also consider the bigger picture to find
relationships between initial and final conditions. Question 4 had the lowest mean of
This question required the students to determine the work done by steam during
heating thereof at constant pressure. The students had to understand the conceptual
process and knowledge and had to recall the correct formula (factual knowledge) and
substitute the correct values to determine the answer. Question 5 had the highest mean
162
Data from Final Examination Overall Results:
Statistics
TOTAL
N Valid 19
Missing 0
Mean 51.158
Standard. Error of Mean 4.2332
Median 56.000
Mode 58.0
Standard. Deviation 18.4519
Variance 340.474
Skewness -.625
Standard. Error of Skewness .524
Kurtosis .309
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.014
Range 74.0
Minimum 11.0
Maximum 85.0
Sum 972.0
163
Figure 4.25: Overall Performance in the Final Examination reflecting a
combined Factual and Conceptual Knowledge achievement of 51.16%
From the data 68% of the students scored between 32.706% and 69.91%. The central
tendency in the scores was 56% although a small number of extreme high values were
recorded in the vicinity of the median. The score most often recorded was 58% as
indicated on the histogram, which was 7.16% higher than the mean. Low skewness
resulted in an almost normal curve. The negative skewness also indicated that a larger
164
Reliability statistics on Tests 1, 1B, 2, 3 and Final Examination:
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Cronbach's Standardized
Alpha Items N of Items
.879 .936 10
Table 4.18: Quantitative Statistics on Reliability for Tests 1, 1b, 2, 3 and Final
Examination
The Cronbach’s Alpha test for internal consistency of the instruments gave a score of
= 0.88 for the written assessments. The Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient ranges
from 0 to 1. The closer the value of alpha is to 1.0 the greater the internal consistency
of the instruments.
In this study, the third research question ‘What would be the effect of a guided enquiry-
communicate procedures and processes related to MTHE 2?’ the following section
165
Data from Oral Test 1:
Statistics
T1 T4 T7 T11 T22 T26 T31 T33 T34 T39 T41 T42 T43
N Valid 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Missin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
g
Mean 85.714 42.85 91.42 91.42 67.857 38.000 71.429 7.143 .000 57.000 28.571 57.143 32.143
7 9 9
Standard 14.285 9.607 5.947 4.040 16.104 13.494 14.869 7.142 .000 14.494 14.869 20.203 13.041
. Error of 7 6 6 6 5 3 0 9 0 7 0 1 0
Mean
Median 100.00 33.00 100.0 100.0 100.00 33.000 100.00 .000 .000 50.000 .000 100.00 25.000
0 0 00 00 0 0 0
Mode 100.0 33.0 a
100.0 100.0 100.0 33.0 100.0 .0 .0 33.0 a
.0 100.0 .0
Standard 37.796 25.41 15.73 10.69 42.608 35.702 39.339 18.89 .000 38.349 39.339 53.452 34.503
. 4 93 59 04 4 5 8 82 0 3 8 2 3
Deviatio
n
Variance 1428.5 646.1 247.6 114.2 1815.4 1274.6 1547.6 357.1 .000 1470.6 1547.6 2857.1 1190.4
71 43 19 86 76 67 19 43 67 19 43 76
Skewnes -2.646 -.559 -1.760 -.374 -.796 .782 -1.115 2.646 -.151 1.115 -.374 .359
s
Standard .794 .794 .794 .794 .794 .794 .794 .794 .794 .794 .794 .794 .794
. Error of
Skewnes
s
Kurtosis 7.000 -.458 2.361 -2.800 -1.301 .246 .273 7.000 -1.405 .273 -2.800 -2.090
Standard 1.587 1.587 1.587 1.587 1.587 1.587 1.587 1.587 1.58 1.587 1.587 1.587 1.587
. Error of 7
Kurtosis
Range 100.0 67.0 40.0 20.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 .0 100.0 100.0 100.0 75.0
Minimum .0 .0 60.0 80.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0
Maximu 100.0 67.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 50.0 .0 100.0 100.0 100.0 75.0
m
Sum 600.0 300.0 640.0 640.0 475.0 266.0 500.0 50.0 .0 399.0 200.0 400.0 225.0
166
Figure 4.26: Question 7 in Oral Test 1 reflecting a high level of Conceptual
Knowledge
In this question, the students had to explain to the examiner which components
constituted the steady flow energy equation. The scores varied between 60% and
100% with the majority of the students getting 100% for the question which resulted in
the mode being 100%. One student obtained 60% and one 80% which resulted in the
standard deviation being pushed up by these outliers. Question 7 had the highest mean
167
Figure 4.27: Question 11 in Oral Test 1 reflecting a high level of Conceptual
Knowledge
In this question, the students had to explain which products would appear in the table
for the mass analysis of a specific fuel. The histogram showed closeness to a normal
curve with the mode and the median being 100. Most students could express
themselves clearly and could list the products of combustion correctly. The scores
varied between 80% and 100%. Question 11 together with question 7 had the highest
168
Figure 4.28: Question 34 in Oral Test 1 reflecting a low level of Conceptual
Knowledge
In this question, the students had to explain how the water treatment of an electrode
boiler differed from that of a normal coal fired boiler. On this particular section of the
work, the students were given a project with certain questions to which they had to find
answers. One of these questions was to investigate the difference between coal fired
and electrode boilers with regard to their construction, operation and water treatment.
Here the students hat to tap into their memory and retrieve the information which they
had found during their project. Not a single student could answer this question correctly
as revealed by the data. A possible cause to the problem could be that students did not
169
regard the contents of their project to be included in assessments and once they have
submitted it, they forget about it. To overcome this, feedback sessions can be
introduced on completed projects as part of a group activity and in this way discussing
their findings and making them aware of the importance and relevance of project work
to enrich the content knowledge in the course work modules. Question 34 had the
170
Data from Oral Test 2:
Statistics
T2 T3 T5 T8 T9 T10 T13 T21 T25 T30 T37 T38 T40 T44 T46
N Valid 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Missi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ng
Mean 31.25 100.0 93.75 83.25 86.25 56.25 12.50 65.12 37.50 71.87 12.50 83.25 50.00 12.50 50.12
0 00 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 5
Standa 13.15 .0000 6.250 9.480 12.38 17.51 9.449 8.463 13.23 11.01 12.50 4.410 12.50 12.50 12.32
rd. 26 0 7 34 91 1 0 28 69 00 8 00 00 95
Error
of
Mean
Median 25.00 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 75.00 .000 75.00 25.00 75.00 .000 83.00 50.00 .000 50.00
0 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mode .0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 .0 75.0 .0a 100.0 .0 83.0 50.0 .0 50.0
Standa 37.20 .0000 17.67 26.81 35.02 49.55 26.72 23.93 37.42 31.16 35.35 12.47 35.35 35.35 34.87
rd. 12 77 55 55 16 61 70 80 06 53 57 53 53 30
Deviati
on
Varianc 1383. .000 312.5 719.0 1226. 2455. 714.2 572.9 1400. 970.9 1250. 155.6 1250. 1250. 1216.
e 929 00 71 786 357 86 82 857 82 000 43 000 000 125
Skewn .824 - - -2.775 -.312 2.339 -.647 .790 -.286 2.828 .080 .404 2.828 -.574
ess 2.828 1.384
Standa .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752 .752
rd.
Error
of
Skewn
ess
Kurtosi -.152 8.000 .399 7.756 -2.358 5.469 .753 -.728 - 8.000 -.698 -.614 8.000 -.930
s 1.984
Standa 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481 1.481
rd.
Error
of
Kurtosi
s
Range 100.0 .0 50.0 67.0 100.0 100.0 75.0 79.0 100.0 75.0 100.0 33.0 100.0 100.0 88.0
Minimu .0 100.0 50.0 33.0 .0 .0 .0 21.0 .0 25.0 .0 67.0 .0 .0 .0
m
Maxim 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 75.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 88.0
um
Sum 250.0 800.0 750.0 666.0 690.0 450.0 100.0 521.0 300.0 575.0 100.0 666.0 400.0 100.0 401.0
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown
171
Figure 4.29: Question 3 in Oral Test 2 reflecting a high level of Conceptual
Knowledge
In this question, the students had to define the term ‘reversible process.’ Here, the
students had to use their conceptual knowledge of this section to explain the answer
correctly. As indicated by the data everybody had 100% for this question. Question 3
172
Figure 4.30: Question 13 in Oral Test 2 reflecting a low level of Conceptual
Knowledge
In this question, the students had to explain to the examiner how the amount of vapour
would be determined in the case of a liquid and gaseous fuel when calculating the
lower calorific values of the fuels. Only one student scored 75% and another 25%, the
rest had 0%. As indicated on the histogram, most students failed this question. The
standard deviation was pushed up by the single outliers in the high percentages. To be
able to answer this question correctly, students had to use their factual and conceptual
knowledge of this section of the work. The data revealed that most students could not
do this, which showed that students had to spend more time on this section during
problem solving sessions with a variety of problems containing higher and lower
173
calorific values. Question 13 had the lowest mean of 12.5 and a high positive skewness
of 2.339.
In this question, the students had to explain the reasons for carrying out ‘blow-down’
on boiler plants. This was part of a boiler project which students had to do by visiting
industry and finding answers to a list of questions given to them. Student’s general
response during the oral test was ‘it is done automatically’ which is not the answer to
the question although their statement was correct for some plants. Only one student
gave the correct answer and rest did not know why blow-down was carried out. One
possible reason for this poor performance is that the students did not regard the
174
content of project work as being part of the syllabus on which they would be assessed
upon. Another reason could be that project work was normally done in groups and that
some of the group members were passive and copied the work done by the others. In
future feedback on these projects must be introduced into the group sessions for
discussion. Question 37 had the lowest mean of 12.5 and the highest positive skewness
of 2.828.
In this question, the students had to explain how air entered a surface condenser. This
question required the students to use their conceptual knowledge on this section of the
syllabus to give the correct explanation. One student could do this, which meant that all
175
the others did not understand how air entered the system, resulting in the central
tendency to be 0. This resulted in a median and mode of 0. The low number of outliers
in the higher percentages increased the standard deviation to 35.355. During the
introduction of condensers to the students, all important aspects were covered and
explained. However students should be given extra time to work on this in their groups
and more time for discussion must be allowed. Question 44 had the lowest mean of
Statistics
TOTAL
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 58.467
Standard. Error of Mean 4.1160
Median 61.000
Mode 64.0a
Standard. Deviation 15.9413
Variance 254.124
Skewness -.830
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis -.241
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 51.0
Minimum 26.0
Maximum 77.0
Sum 877.0
176
Figure 4.33: Overall Performance in Oral Tests 1 and 2 reflecting a
Conceptual Knowledge level 58.47%
The attention of the reader is once again drawn to the fact that the final examination
was written on the entire syllabus (seven modules) which was covered over a period of
13 weeks. Students used the GEBL approach when preparing for the examination in
groups.
177
4.3.3 Structured Questionnaire
opinion regarding the GEBL process which they were subjected to for one semester.
The research question/s addressed by each item will be indicated in brackets. From the
Statistics
Q1
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 1.4667
Standard. Error of Mean .21529
Median 1.0000
Mode 1.00
Standard. Deviation .83381
Variance .695
Skewness 2.253
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis 5.776
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 3.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 4.00
Sum 22.00
178
Figure 4.34: Question 1 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 67% of
students ‘strongly agree’
3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree. From the data 67% of the students
scored 0.636 (rounded off to 1) to 2.304 (rounded off to 2). The most common score
was indicated by the mode as ‘1’. The students therefore ‘strongly agreed’ that they
enjoyed the group sessions, 27% ‘agreed’ that they enjoyed the group sessions and 6%
‘disagreed’ that they enjoyed the group sessions. The standard deviation was influenced
by the single high score of ‘4’ (disagree). The skewness had a high positive value which
meant that the concentration of responses was in the lower scale between ‘1’ and ‘2’
179
and the high positive kurtosis (2.776 higher than the normal) indicated a peak in this
area.
Statistics
Q2
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 1.2667
Standard. Error of Mean .11819
Median 1.0000
Mode 1.00
Standard. Deviation .45774
Variance .210
Skewness 1.176
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis -.734
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 1.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 2.00
Sum 19.00
180
Figure 4.35: Question 2 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 73% of
students ‘strongly agree’
73% ‘strongly agreed’ that the EBL helped them to analyse problems more effectively
and 27% ‘agreed’ and no other responses were recorded. The data indicated that both
the median and mode was ‘1’ (strongly agree) and that 68% of the students gave this
181
Item 3 (RQ 1 & 2):
Statistics
Q3
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 2.0667
Standard. Error of Mean .22817
Median 2.0000
Mode 3.00
Standard. Deviation .88372
Variance .781
Skewness -.142
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis -1.783
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 2.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 3.00
Sum 31.00
182
Figure 4.36: Question 3 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 33% of
students ‘strongly agree’ and 27% ‘agree’
33% of the students ‘strongly agreed’ that when working alone, the EBL approach
helped them to analyse problems more effectively, 27% ‘agreed’ and 40% assumed a
‘neutral’ position.
183
Item 4 (RQ 1 & 2):
Statistics
Q4
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 1.4000
Standard. Error of Mean .16330
Median 1.0000
Mode 1.00
Standard. Deviation .63246
Variance .400
Skewness 1.407
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis 1.264
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 2.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 3.00
Sum 21.00
184
Figure 4.37: Question 4 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 67% of
the students ‘strongly agree’
67% of the students ‘strongly agreed’ that the EBL method helped them to understand
work better and not to just memorise it, 27% ‘agreed’ and 6% assumed a ‘neutral’
position.
185
Item 5 (RQ 1 & 2):
Statistics
Q5
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 1.8000
Standard. Error of Mean .14475
Median 2.0000
Mode 2.00
Standard. Deviation .56061
Variance .314
Skewness -.112
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis .378
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 2.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 3.00
Sum 27.00
186
Figure 4.38: Question 5 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 27% of
the students ‘strongly agree’ and 67% ‘agree’
27% of the students ‘strongly agreed’ that the EBL method helped them to develop the
ability to solve problems on their own, 67% ‘agreed’ and 6% assumed a ‘neutral’
position.
187
Item 6 (RQ 1 & 2):
Statistics
Q6
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 1.5333
Standard. Error of Mean .21529
Median 1.0000
Mode 1.00
Standard. Deviation .83381
Variance .695
Skewness 2.012
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis 4.867
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 3.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 4.00
Sum 23.00
188
Figure 4.39: Question 6 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 60% of
the students ‘strongly agree’
60% of the students ‘strongly agreed’ that the Thermodynamics booklet with questions
answer and discussions helped them to understand the work better, 33% ‘agreed’ and
6% ‘disagreed’.
189
Item 7 (RQ 1 & 2):
Statistics
Q7
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 1.8667
Standard. Error of Mean .16523
Median 2.0000
Mode 2.00
Standard. Deviation .63994
Variance .410
Skewness .103
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis -.127
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 2.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 3.00
Sum 28.00
190
Figure 4.40: Question 7 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 27% of
the students ‘strongly agree and 60% ‘agree’
27% of the students ‘strongly agreed’ that the Thermodynamics booklets’ additional
questions and answers helped them to understand and analyse new problems better,
191
Item 8:
Statistics
Q8
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 1.8000
Standard. Error of Mean .22254
Median 2.0000
Mode 2.00
Standard. Deviation .86189
Variance .743
Skewness 1.205
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis 1.800
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 3.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 4.00
Sum 27.00
192
Figure 4.41: Question 8 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 40% of
the students ‘strongly agree’ and 47% ‘agree’
40% of the students ‘strongly agreed’ that the EBL method and help them understand
‘disagreed’.
193
Item 9:
Statistics
Q9
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 1.6000
Standard. Error of Mean .27255
Median 1.0000
Mode 1.00
Standard. Deviation 1.05560
Variance 1.114
Skewness 2.640
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis 8.173
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 4.00
Minimum 1.00
Maximum 5.00
Sum 24.00
194
Figure 4.42: Question 9 from the Structured Questionnaire reflecting 60% of
the students ‘strongly agree’ and 33% ‘agree’
60% of the students ‘strongly agreed’ that the EBL method should also be introduced
into other course, 33% ‘agreed’ and 6% ‘strongly disagreed’. However one student who
this in the open-ended questions. Comparing these responses with the interview
responses, all students were in favour of introducing this method into their other course
and a conclusion could therefore be made that the single response of ‘strongly disagree’
195
The overall impression from the responses indicated that students enjoyed working
together in groups, listening to each others’ opinions and views. They also enjoyed
sharing their opinions with their peers. An exchange of information took place during
discussions benefiting all group members. There was also a strong indication that this
approach helped them to solve problems in groups and on their own more effectively.
This could be as a result of the skill which they had developed to analyse problems
following the systematic approach illustrated in the EBL booklet. The students also
wanted this method of teaching and learning to be introduced into other courses which
knowledge and that also made MTHE2 which seemed to be a ‘difficult course’ to be
Assessments
From the quantitative data presented above there is an indication that GEBL assisted
the students in dealing with larger more complex volumes of work. The students’
performance improved with an increased work load and more complex modules of the
syllabus. There was an improvement in their ability to factual recall of MTHE 2 concepts
as indicated in the Fig. 4.43. This answered the first research question.
196
Factional Knowledge
40 2 1b 0.5 48
20
3 2 2 38
0
1 2 3 4 5 4 3 3 47
TESTS 1, 1B, 2, 3 & FINAL EXAMINATION
5 FE 7 51
MTHE 2 concepts, principles and applications as indicated in Fig. 4.45. This answered
the second research question. From the oral test data there was indication that GEBL
indicated in Fig. 4.45. This answered the third research question. The students’
responses gathered from the structured questionnaires were also in support of the data
recorded by the formative and summative assessments. There was an indication that
GEBL assisted them in learning and this was evident from the improvement in
assessment scores.
197
Conceptual Knowledge
37
38 36 2 1b 0.5 48
36 34
34 3 2 2 38
32
30 4 3 3 47
1 2 3 4 5
TESTS 1, 1B, 2, 3 & FINAL EXAMINATION 5 FE 7 51
In addressing the fourth research question ‘To what extent would the formulation and
use of key performance indicators (KPIs) be an effective tool for ascertaining students’
taken with the KPIs and analysed with PASW. These will be discussed to point out the
198
Data from KPI Analysis Measurements Test1:
Statistics
ANALYSIS
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 49.600
Standard. Error of Mean 2.2494
Median 48.500
Mode 43.0a
Standard. Deviation 10.0598
Variance 101.200
Skewness .200
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis -.619
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 34.0
Minimum 33.0
Maximum 67.0
Sum 992.0
199
Figure 4.46: Analysis Measurements with KPIs in Test 1
KPIs analysis measurement for Test 1 had a mean of 49.6 and a positive skewness of
0.200. These KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2 principles to analyse
and solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to analyse a problem and
produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a systematic approach towards
the solution’. The data indicated that the central tendency was about 48.5% with the
score which was most often recorded being 43%. Outcomes were achieved by 49.6%
acquire conceptual knowledge and understanding and the ability to use this knowledge
200
during problem solving needs to be developed.
Statistics
ANALYTICAL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 61.050
Standard. Error of Mean 5.0139
Median 63.500
Mode 33.0a
Standard. Deviation 22.4229
Variance 502.787
Skewness -.123
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis -1.488
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 66.0
Minimum 27.0
Maximum 93.0
Sum 1221.0
201
Figure 4.47: Analytical Measurements with KPIs in Test 1
KPIs analytical measurement of Test 1 had a mean of 61.05 and a negative skewness
of 0.123. These KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2 principles to
analyse and solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to analyse a
problem and produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a systematic
approach towards the solution’. A few extreme cases were recorded in the upper and
lower percentages. The central tendency was 63.5% which was approximately 2.5%
higher than the mean. However, the score most often recorded was 33%. In this case
the students achieved the outcomes measured by these KPIs by 61.05% with traditional
teaching and learning approaches. The students’ ability to acquire factual and
202
conceptual knowledge and understanding and the ability to use this knowledge during
problem solving was well developed for this low volume of work.
Statistics
OVERALL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 53.500
Standard. Error of Mean 3.0109
Median 51.000
Mode 51.0
Standard. Deviation 13.4654
Variance 181.316
Skewness .088
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis -1.186
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 43.0
Minimum 33.0
Maximum 76.0
Sum 1070.0
203
Figure 4.48: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Test 1
The overall KPI measurement for Test 1 had a mean of 53.5 and a low positive
skewness of 0.088. The central tendency was 51% and the score most often recorded
was also 51%. Therefore, the extent to which the outcomes have been achieved in Test
1 as measured by the KPIs were 53.5% using traditional teaching and learning
approaches on the first half of module 1. The extent to which traditional teaching and
learning assisted the students in acquiring factual and conceptual knowledge and
understanding and the ability to use this knowledge during problem solving needs to be
204
Data from KPI Analysis Measurements Test 1b:
Statistics
ANALYSIS
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 47.000
Standard. Error of Mean 1.7244
Median 46.000
Mode 43.0
Standard. Deviation 7.7119
Variance 59.474
Skewness -.171
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis -.281
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 29.0
Minimum 31.0
Maximum 60.0
Sum 940.0
205
Figure 4.49: Analysis Measurements with KPIs in Test 1b
KPIs analysis measurement for Test 1b had a mean of 47 and a negative skewness of -
0.171. These KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2 principles to analyse
and solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to analyse a problem and
produce a solution, taking into account the crucial factors in a systematic approach
towards the solution’. The central tendency was 46% and the score which was most
often recorded was 43%. Single cases of outliers were recorded in the upper and lower
percentages and the outcomes which were achieved in Test 1b was 47% with
traditional teaching and learning approaches. The students’ ability to acquire conceptual
knowledge and understanding and the ability to use this knowledge during problem
206
solving needs to be developed.
Statistics
ANALYTICAL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 57.000
Standard. Error of Mean 2.9558
Median 60.000
Mode 65.0
Standard. Deviation 13.2188
Variance 174.737
Skewness -1.091
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis 2.469
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 60.0
Minimum 20.0
Maximum 80.0
Sum 1140.0
207
Figure 4.50: Analytical Measurements with KPIs in Test 1b
KPIs analytical measurement for Test 1b had a mean of 57 and a negative skewness of
-1.091. These KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2 principles to
analyse and solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to analyse a
problem and produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a systematic
approach towards the solution’. Isolated cases in the upper and lower percentages were
recorded which pushed the standard deviation up to 13.219. The central tendency was
60% which was 3% lower than the mean as a result of the skewness and the score
most often recorded was 65%. The students’ ability to acquire factual and conceptual
knowledge and understanding and the ability to use this knowledge during problem
208
solving needs to be developed.
Statistics
OVERALL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 50.650
Standard. Error of Mean 1.9858
Median 52.000
Mode 49.0a
Standard. Deviation 8.8809
Variance 78.871
Skewness -.917
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis 1.808
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 38.0
Minimum 27.0
Maximum 65.0
Sum 1013.0
209
Figure 4.51: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Test 1b
The overall KPI measurement for Test 1b had a mean of 50.65 and a negative
skewness of -0.917. The central tendency was 52% with the score which was the most
often recorded being 49%. Isolated cases of outliers pushed the standard deviation up
to 8.881. The extent to which the outcomes have been achieved as measured by the
KPIs in Test 1b was 50.65% with the traditional teaching and learning approach. The
extent to which traditional teaching and learning assisted the students in acquiring
factual and conceptual knowledge and understanding and the ability to use this
knowledge during problem solving resulted in students not being able to achieve most
210
Data from KPI Analysis Measurements Test 2:
Statistics
ANALYSIS
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 50.100
Standard. Error of Mean 2.2975
Median 49.000
Mode 42.0
Standard. Deviation 10.2746
Variance 105.568
Skewness .100
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis -.869
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 38.0
Minimum 31.0
Maximum 69.0
Sum 1002.0
211
Figure 4.52: Analysis Measurements with KPIs in Test 2
KPIs analysis measurement for Test 2 had a mean of 50.1 and a positive skewness of
0.1 These KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2 principles to analyse
and solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to analyse a problem and
produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a systematic approach towards
the solution’. The central tendency here was 49% and the score most often recorded
was 42%. The degree of achievement of the outcomes was however higher than in
Test 1b which can be contributed to the fact that GEBL did assist student learning and
knowledge retention despite the larger volumes of work. It can also be pointed out that
GEBL assisted the students in developing the ability to deal with more complex work
212
and master it.
Statistics
ANALYTICAL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 52.250
Standard. Error of Mean 2.3917
Median 50.000
Mode 60.0
Standard. Deviation 10.6962
Variance 114.408
Skewness .023
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis -.926
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 35.0
Minimum 35.0
Maximum 70.0
Sum 1045.0
213
Figure 4.53: Analytical Measurements with KPIs in Test 2
KPIs analytical measurement for Test 2 had a mean of 52.25 and a small positive
skewness of 0.023. KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2 principles to
analyse and solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to analyse a
problem and produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a systematic
approach towards the solution’. The central tendency in this case was 50% and the
score that was recorded the most often was 60%. The degree of achievement of the
outcomes was however lower than with traditional teaching and learning which can be
214
contributed to the fact that the GEBL intervention took some time before its full effect
Statistics
OVERALL
N Valid 20
Missing 0
Mean 51.850
Standard. Error of Mean 1.6047
Median 50.500
Mode 59.0
Standard. Deviation 7.1765
Variance 51.503
Skewness -.261
Standard. Error of Skewness .512
Kurtosis -.706
Standard. Error of Kurtosis .992
Range 26.0
Minimum 37.0
Maximum 63.0
Sum 1037.0
215
Figure 4.54: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Test 2
The overall KPI measurement for Test 2 had a mean of 51.85 and a negative skewness
of -0.261. The central tendency here was 50% with the score that was the most
recorded being 59%. The extent to which the course outcomes for these two modules
have been achieved by GEBL was 51.85%. The average of the first two tests on just
one module was 52.075%. However, although the work load and the degree of
difficulty increased in Test 2, they were able to get 51.85%. Without GEBL this would
not have been possible. 51.85% is lower than the 52.075% which was achieved
216
Data from KPI Analysis Measurements Test 3:
Statistics
ANALYSIS
N Valid 19
Missing 0
Mean 51.632
Standard. Error of Mean 3.1901
Median 52.000
Mode 40.0a
Standard. Deviation 13.9053
Variance 193.357
Skewness .363
Standard. Error of Skewness .524
Kurtosis .012
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.014
Range 53.0
Minimum 31.0
Maximum 84.0
Sum 981.0
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown
217
Figure 4.55: Analysis Measurements with KPIs in Test 3
KPIs analysis measurement for Test 3 had a mean of 51.63 and a positive skewness of
0.363. KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2 principles to analyse and
solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to analyse a problem and
produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a systematic approach towards
the solution’. In this case the central tendency was 52% and the score that was
recorded most often was 40%. The outliers at the extreme ends of the scale pushed
the standard deviation up to 13.905. The degree of achievement of the outcomes was
however higher than in Tests 1b and 2, which can be contributed to the fact that GEBL
did assist student learning and knowledge retention despite the larger volumes of work.
218
It can also be pointed out that the students developed the ability to deal with more
Statistics
ANALYTICAL
N Valid 19
Missing 0
Mean 58.000
Standard. Error of Mean 3.5836
Median 62.000
Mode 62.0
Standard. Deviation 15.6205
Variance 244.000
Skewness .142
Standard. Error of Skewness .524
Kurtosis .384
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.014
Range 64.0
Minimum 30.0
Maximum 94.0
Sum 1102.0
219
Figure 4.56: Analytical Measurements with KPIs in Test 3
KPIs analytical measurement for Test 3 had a mean of 58 and a positive skewness of
0.142. KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2 principles to analyse and
solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to analyse a problem and
produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a systematic approach towards
the solution’. The central tendency in this case was 62% with the score recorded most
often also being 62%. The low number outliers on the scale pushed the standard
deviation up to 15.62. The degree of achievement of the outcomes was however higher
than in Tests 1b and 2 which can be contributed to the fact that GEBL did assist student
220
learning and knowledge retention despite the larger volumes of work. It can also be
pointed out that the students developed the ability to deal with more complex work and
Statistics
OVERALL
N Valid 19
Missing 0
Mean 53.842
Standard. Error of Mean 3.0380
Median 56.000
Mode 50.0a
Standard. Deviation 13.2425
Variance 175.363
Skewness -.107
Standard. Error of Skewness .524
Kurtosis -.468
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.014
Range 47.0
Minimum 32.0
Maximum 79.0
Sum 1023.0
221
Figure 4.57: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Test 3
The overall KPI measurement for Test 3 had a mean of 53.84 and a negative skewness
of -0.107. The central tendency in this case was 56% and the score recorded most
often was 50%. The outliers in this case pushed the standard deviation up to 13.242.
The extent to which the outcomes have been achieved in Test 3 as measured by the
KPIs was 53.84% which is an improvement from the 51.85% in Test 2. Again attention
must be drawn here to the fact that Test 3 was written on three modules which were
more complex than module 1 for Tests 1 and 1b and more complex than the two
modules for Test 2. The degree of achievement of the outcomes was however higher
than in Tests 1b and 2 which can be contributed to the fact that GEBL did assist student
222
learning and knowledge retention despite the larger volumes of work. It can also be
pointed out that the students developed the ability to deal with more complex work and
Statistics
ANALYSIS
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 52.467
Standard. Error of Mean 3.3663
Median 53.000
Mode 60.0
Standard. Deviation 13.0377
Variance 169.981
Skewness -.081
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis .657
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 51.0
Minimum 29.0
Maximum 80.0
Sum 787.0
223
Figure 4.58: Analysis Measurements with KPIs in the Final Examination
KPIs analysis measurement for the final examination had a mean of 52.47 and a
negative skewness of -0.81. KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2
principles to analyse and solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to
analyse a problem and produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a
systematic approach towards the solution’. The central tendency here was 53% and the
score that most often recorded was 60%. The low number outliers pushed the standard
higher than that of all the previous assessments, which can be contributed to the fact
that GEBL did assist student learning and knowledge retention despite the larger
224
volumes of work. It can also be pointed out that the students developed the ability to
Statistics
ANALYTICAL
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 59.600
Standard. Error of Mean 3.4583
Median 59.000
Mode 58.0a
Standard. Deviation 13.3940
Variance 179.400
Skewness -.997
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis 3.094
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 59.0
Minimum 24.0
Maximum 83.0
Sum 894.0
225
Figure 4.59: Analytical Measurements with KPIs in the Final Examination
KPIs analytical measurement for the final examination had a mean of 59.6 and a
negative skewness of -0.997. KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to apply MTHE 2
principles to analyse and solve the problem accurately’ and the ‘Students’ ability to
analyse a problem and produce a solution, taking into account crucial factors in a
systematic approach towards the solution’. The central tendency here was 59% and the
score that was recorded most often was 58%. The low number of outliers pushed the
however higher than Tests 1b, 2 and 3, which can be contributed to the fact that GEBL
did assist student learning and knowledge retention despite the larger volumes of work.
226
It can also be pointed out that the students developed the ability to deal with more
Statistics
OVERALL
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 56.867
Standard. Error of Mean 2.8849
Median 58.000
Mode 58.0a
Standard. Deviation 11.1731
Variance 124.838
Skewness -.504
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis .353
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 43.0
Minimum 33.0
Maximum 76.0
Sum 853.0
227
Figure 4.60: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in the Final
Examination
The overall KPI measurement for the final examination had a mean of 56.867 and a
negative skewness of -0.504. The central tendency in this case was 58% and the score
recorded most often was also 58%. The low number of outliers on the extreme end of
the scale pushed the standard deviation up to 11.1731. The extent to which the
outcomes for MTHE 2 have been achieved as measured with the KPIs was 56.867%.
This is a significant improvement from the previous tests and what made it even more
significant was the fact the final examination was on seven modules (progressively
more difficult and a larger volume of work) which was covered over a period of 13
228
weeks. Here it was quite evident that GEBL made the lecturing process a more effective
one looking at the above results. Even with a larger volume of work with increased
Results obtained from the KPIs for the formative as well as summative
assessments:
KPIs
Percentage
Assessment Analysis Analytical Overall
Test 1 49.6 61.05 53.5
Test 1b 47 57 50.65
Test 2 50.1 52.25 51.85
Test 3 51.63 58 53.84
Final examination 52.47 59.6 56.87
Total 50.16 57.58 53.34
4.3.6 Summary of Data from KPIs for Tests 1, 1b, 2, 3, and Final Examination
50.16% of the analysis component as defined in the course outcomes for MTHE 2 had
been achieved as indicated in Table 4.46. It also showed that the students’ ability to
analyse problems improved from an average of 48.3% in the first module (traditional
229
indicated in Table 4.46. It showed that the students’ ability to perform analytical
procedures on one module of the syllabus was 59.03% on one module covered with
traditional teaching and their ability to perform analytical procedure was an average of
The first module’s outcomes were 52.08% and that of the GEBL modules was 54.19%
as indicated in Table 4.46. These results indicated that the GEBL intervention had a
50.16% success rate in developing the students’ ability to analyse problems. There was
‘1’ and ‘4’ was 53.34%. The KPIs achievements of the selected course outcomes are
58
1 0.5 55
57
56
2 0.5 52
Percentages
55
54
53 3 2 52
52
51 4 3 54
50
49
5 7 57
T1 T1b T2 T3 FE
230
Data from KPI Explanation Measurements Oral Tests 1 and 2:
Statistics
EXPLANATION
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 54.6667
Standard. Error of Mean 5.24329
Median 60.0000
Mode 20.00a
Standard. Deviation 20.30717
Variance 412.381
Skewness -.808
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis -.323
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 60.00
Minimum 20.00
Maximum 80.00
Sum 820.00
231
Figure 4.62: Explanation Measurements with KPIs in Oral Tests 1 and 2
The KPI explanation measurement for oral Tests 1 and 2 had a mean of 54.67 and a
function in the overall plant which it forms part of, treatment and maintenance
concepts effectively in MTHE 2’. The outliers in the lower percentages pushed the
standard deviation up to 20.307. The central tendency in this case was 60% and the
scored most often recorded was about 20%. GEBL assisted the students in developing
232
the ability to explain concepts and procedures related to MTHE 2 accurately.
Statistics
UNDERSTANDING
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 50.6667
Standard. Error of Mean 4.87625
Median 55.0000
Mode 20.00a
Standard. Deviation 18.88562
Variance 356.667
Skewness -.394
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis -.074
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 65.00
Minimum 20.00
Maximum 85.00
Sum 760.00
233
Figure 4.63: Understanding Measurements with KPIs in Oral Tests 1 and 2
The KPIs understanding measurement for Oral Tests 1 and 2 had a mean of 50.67 and
function in the overall plant which it forms part of, treatment and maintenance
concepts effectively in MTHE 2’. The outliers in the upper and lower percentages
pushed the standard deviation up to 18.886. The central tendency in this case was 55%
and the score most often recorded was 20%. GEBL assisted the students in
234
understanding MTHE 2 concepts, processes and procedures by expressing it in their
own words.
Statistics
DISCUSSION
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 68.6000
Standard. Error of Mean 4.23568
Median 71.0000
Mode 71.00a
Standard. Deviation 16.40470
Variance 269.114
Skewness -.614
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis .011
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 55.00
Minimum 36.00
Maximum 91.00
Sum 1029.00
235
Figure 4.64: Discussion Measurements with KPIs in Oral Tests 1 and 2
The KPI discussion measurement for Oral Tests 1 and 2 had a mean of 68.6 and a
negative skewness of -0.614. KPIs measured the ‘Students’ ability to explain/discuss the
function in the overall plant which it forms part of, treatment and maintenance
effectively in MTHE 2’. The central tendency in this case was 71% and the score most
often recorded was also 71%. GEBL assisted the students develop the ability to perform
236
Data from KPI Overall Measurements Oral Tests 1 and 2:
Statistics
OVERALL
N Valid 15
Missing 0
Mean 57.9333
Standard. Error of Mean 3.50165
Median 64.0000
Mode 69.00
Standard. Deviation 13.56185
Variance 183.924
Skewness -.906
Standard. Error of Skewness .580
Kurtosis .012
Standard. Error of Kurtosis 1.121
Range 46.00
Minimum 28.00
Maximum 74.00
Sum 869.00
237
Figure 4.65: Overall Performance Measurements with KPIs in Oral Tests 1
and 2
The overall KPI measurement for Oral Tests 1 and 2 had a mean of 57.93 and a
negative skewness of -0.906. The central tendency in this case was 64% and the score
most often recorded was 69%. The low number of outliers in the lower percentages
pushed the standard deviation up to 13.562. The extent to which the outcomes of
MTHE 2 have been achieved as measured by the KPIs was 57.93%. This was the first
time that oral assessments on the entire syllabus were done in MTHE 2 and also the
first time that the KPI measurement was used. The data showed that the students
238
Future studies can be done to compare the difference in achievement of the course
outcomes by means of the traditional teaching and learning methods and GEBL.
KPIs
Percentage
Assessment Explanation Understanding Discussion Overall
Oral Tests 1 and 55 51 69 58
2
Table 4.51: Summary of results from KPI Measurements in Oral Tests 1 and
2
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Cronbach's Standardized
Alpha Items N of Items
.801 .818 10
The Cronbach’s Alpha test for internal consistency of the instruments gave a score of
0.80 for the KPIs. The Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient ranges from 0 to 1.
The closer the value of alpha is to 1.0 the greater the internal consistency of the
instruments.
239
4.3.7 Summary of Data from KPIs for Oral Tests 1 and 2
55% of the students could give a satisfactory explanation of the questions posed to
them. This also indicated that these students could express themselves properly and
could use the correct terms during explanations (see table 4.51).
51% of the students understood the questions posed to them. They could make a
connection between the theory and what happened in practice of what was being
asked. These students understood how the plant operated, what the function of each
component was and how the one component affected the other. They also knew which
factors could influence the overall operation and with regard to safety which reading
69% of the students were able to perform discussions on various issues and could
express themselves satisfactory. Here the students were able to discuss operations,
KPIs ‘2’ and ‘3’ were used to measure the extent to which the relevant outcomes were
240
4.4 Summary of Highest Scored Data
From the data collected, a summary of the highest scored theory questions are given
below.
Question 2.3
Question 4.1
“Complete the attached diagram/s, indicate clearly the wet and dry air pump units and
fill in all relevant detail as well as the directions of flow for the air, water and steam”.
In the questions listed above, students had achieved scores of 77%, 73% and 65%,
to them as well as the ability to analyse the information provided in the problem. The
majority were also able to use that information to accurately address the questions
241
posed, which shows a high level of conceptual knowledge. The students were also able
to link the theory of processes with diagrams successfully (see tables 4.9, 4.12 & 4.15).
Item 1a: The group sessions motivated you to come prepared to class.
Positive responses: Neutral or negative responses:
So that I can work together and not be left behind/I will have to Group sessions did not motivate me to come prepared to class
explain what I understand/it was like a competition and nobody 0 (N = 18)
wants to look stupid
18 (N = 18)
Item 1b: The group sessions helped developing your communication skills.
Positive responses: Neutral or negative responses:
In the group you use English so you become use to the language/I It was difficult to take part in the group sessions because I am a
can explain to others and we can share/because I have to talk to shy person
others and on my own I do not communicate 1 (N = 19)
18 (N = 19)
Item 4: This method helped me to understand the work and not to just memorise it.
Positive responses: Neutral or negative responses:
We share information and analyse the problem so we understood This method did not help me to understand the work and I still
what to do/group discussions helped us to understand the work/we have to memorise it
were able to use questions to analyse new problems 0 (N = 20)
20 (N = 20)
Student A
“... not just knowing what you calculate but what is it in the engineering field what
242
Student C
“... this method gives us the ability to understand it and not just guessing or
memorizing it... You know in discussions you would go through in groups, debates
and we are challenging each other in the groups someone gets to be disagreeing
with you in the group and you will have to try to convince and explain to him
Student I
“... because group working is all about all the students participating...”
Question 11
Question 3
“What are the differences between the following processes: adiabatic, polytropic and
isothermal?”
In the questions listed above the students had achieved scores of 91.4%, 91.4% and
243
100%, respectively. The students were able to give clear and accurate explanations.
They also had a good understanding of the process/processes involved and could list
Item 1b: The group sessions helped developing your communication skills.
Positive responses: Neutral or negative responses:
In the group you use English so you become use to the language/I It was difficult to take part in the group sessions because I am a
can explain to others and we can share/because I have to talk to shy person
others and on my own I do not communicate 1 (N = 19)
18 (N = 19)
Item 2: The enquiry based sessions helped me to analyse problems effectively.
Positive responses: Neutral or negative responses:
The questions given help me to analyse the problems/I have to ask The enquiry based sessions did not help me to analyse problems
myself what do I understand about the problem/we were taught more effectively
how to tackle problems and how to get answers to our 0 (N = 20)
questions/when I work on my own I try to ask myself questions
about what is given and what do I understand about the problem
20 (N = 20)
Item 4: This method helped me to understand the work and not to just memorise it.
Positive responses: Neutral or negative responses:
We share information and analyse the problem so we understood This method did not help me to understand the work and I still
what to do/group discussions helped us to understand the work/we have to memorise it
were able to use questions to analyse new problems 0 (N = 20)
20 (N = 20)
Student responses from interviews regarding GEBL and in particular its influence on
Student B
“In Thermodynamics there are a number of terms and well just terms you need to
know that you don’t really pick up if you do work without talking about the work.
So the fact that you were talking about the work helped you to understand these
244
Student K
“It helped develop our communication skills because you get to speak out,
Student L
“I think in this method you gain a lot of skill other than solving the problem, first
you get a chance to communicate and be motivated to be not shy in class... you
gain other skills other than solving problems like talking in front of the people...”
Question 2.4
Question 3.3
“Determine the work done by the steam during the heating process”.
245
In the questions listed above, the students had achieved scores of 84.15%, 89.42%
and 89.27%, respectively. The students were able to manipulate and use the
information supplied in the problem to determine the required solution. It shows that
they understood the relationship between the information presented (variables supplied
in problems) as well as the particular process involved and how to work systematically
246
4.4.8 Interviews (see Appendices 2 & 13):
Item 6: The Thermodynamics booklet with questions and answer helped me to understand the work better.
Positive responses: Neutral or negative responses:
The layout and explanations in the booklet helped us to understand The Thermodynamics booklet did not help to understand the work
new work better/ better
0 (N =20)
Item 7: The Thermodynamics booklet’s additional questions and answers helped me to understand and analyse new problems better.
Positive responses: Neutral or negative responses:
The additional questions in the booklet assisted us to analyse new The booklet with the additional questions and answers did not help
problems/the additional questions helped me to gain more to understand and analyse new problems better
information about the problem 0 (N = 4)
4 (N = 4)
Student A
I have...”
247
Student C
“We were encouraged to write down a certain sequence of each question and how
to answer the question and we were given time before each problem to evaluate
how we were going to actually answer the question, not just looking at the
question and trying to answer that specific question, cause you have to find a
number of things before you answer the actual question that’s asked... before we
actually tackle the problem we would have a list of certain questions that we ask
to ourselves”.
Student J
“... to know which step you should move to and how you should approach the
4.5 Summary
Firstly, GEBL assisted the students in factual recall of MTHE 2 concepts. There was
evidence that students’ performance increased with an increased work load. These
were supported by the data from the structured questionnaires as well as the interview
Secondly, GEBL assisted the students in understanding MTHE 2 concepts, principles and
248
applications. Students were also able to learn new material, understand it and apply
this knowledge in solving problems. These were also supported by the data from the
Thirdly, GEBL assisted the students in their communication skills and the use of MTHE 2
terms. Students were also able to explain concepts, processes and procedures
accurately as indicated in assessment scores (see subsections 4.3.3, 4.4.2 & 4.4.5).
249
CHAPTER 5
This chapter discusses and highlights the findings from the data collected in chapter 4.
Both qualitative and quantitative finding are discussed in relation to the literature
reviewed and the research questions and objectives. The performance of the students
during these assessments as well as their interview responses are also compared to
determine whether there was a correlation between the quantitative and qualitative
data. These findings are then compared with what is reported in literature.
The discussion first concentrates on how the students performed in the theoretical
they had to perform certain calculations are discussed. Finally the achievements of the
A conclusion will also be made on how the findings from this study addressed the aim
and objectives of this research study and how these findings are congruent with those
from similar studies. This chapter will then be concluded by recommendations and a
proposed future model for presenting MTHE 2 and mechanical engineering courses in
general.
250
5.1 GEBLs Impact on Student Performance
Discussions with regard to the findings will now be made in an attempt to address the
research questions.
In addressing the first and second research question: ‘What would be the effect of a
factual recall of MTHE 2 concepts?’ and ‘What would be the effect of a guided enquiry-
understanding of MTHE 2 concepts, principles and applications?’ the mean values from
“... this method gives us the ability to understand it and not just guessing or
memorizing it...”
251
“... not just knowing what you calculate but what is it in the engineering field
From the structured questionnaire item ‘This method helped me to understand the work
and not to just memorise it’, 66.7% of the students strongly agreed and from the item
‘This method helped me develop the ability to solve problems on my own’ 26.7%
With regard to the above results and responses: These results suggested that the
students gave satisfactory answers to the various questions. They were also able to
These performances are also supported by the students’ interview responses. Similar
findings where students had to recall facts, explain processes and procedures are
consistent with those from other studies done on active learning in engineering
education (Prince, 2004; Felder & Brent, 2003; Spronken-Smith, 2007). Findings from
studies done on Kolb’s learning cycle as pedagogy for teaching students in engineering
to address different learning styles, are similar and in support of those found by this
study (Ogot & Okudan, 2006; Kapranos, 2007; Aziz & Chassapis, 2008; Altuger et al.,
2009; Stappenbelt, 2010; Elshorbagy & Schonwetter, 2002). The process followed with
GEBL i.e. introducing new concepts and principles; performing a class example
between group members and group members and lecturer; feedback on group
252
approaches and progress; individual homework and problem solving, allowed for
students with different learning styles to be catered for by one or more of the stages of
GEBL approach. It has different learning approaches which cater for a larger spectrum
of learning styles which is not the case with the traditional teaching and learning
method. This resulted in the increase of the class average from 46% to 55%. The
above observations are also supported by researchers who investigated the impact of
Lamancusa et al., 2008; Naher et al., 2008; O’Dwyer, 2008). GEBL has also resulted in
supported by Killen (2006, p.3). Findings from this study that GEBL also assists deep
learning which resulted in higher retention rates are in line with those from other
studies done on deep learning in engineering education (Ying, 2003; Fowler, 2004;
In addressing the first and second research question: ‘What would be the effect of a
factual recall of MTHE 2 concepts?’ and ‘What would be the effect of a guided enquiry-
understanding of MTHE 2 concepts, principles and applications?’ the mean values from
253
Table 4.10: Question C2.4 mean 84.15%;
Students’ responses on how GEBL assisted them when they had to solve problems:
that I have...”
“... before we actually tackle the problem we would have a list of certain
“... to know which step you should move to and how you should approach the
From the structured questionnaire item ‘The enquiry based sessions helped me to
analyse problems effectively’, 73.7% of the students strongly agreed and from item
‘This method helped me develop the ability to solve problems on my own’, 26.7% of the
With regard to the above results and responses: GEBL gave the students a departure
point when they were facing new problems. This view is also expressed by the students
254
during the interviews. It assisted them to start the analysis process which helped them
to understand the process involved and what variables were given and also what the
relationships between those variables were. GEBL also sought to develop students’
problem from different angles in order to find a solution. Here, the students used
critical thinking skills to achieve their goal. Studies done on the importance of Bloom’s
taxonomy for the development of critical thinking skills and the achievement of learning
outcomes in engineering education (Boles et al., 2005, p.3) are in agreement with the
findings, presented above, from this study. The results from the tables 4.10, 4.13 and
4.19 suggest that GEBL assists deep learning which, results in effective problem solving
abilities. Similar views are corroborated by researchers who have done studies on deep
learning in engineering education (Robbins & Ardebili, 2006, p.6). GEBL also assisted in
a number of steps which they had to follow when solving problems. This corresponds
with the ‘learn how to learn’ described in Finks taxonomy of significant learning (Fink,
2003, pp.4-6). GEBL promoted the movement through Kolb’s learning circle which
resulted in students retaining information for longer periods of time and being able to
There was an improvement in the students’ ability to use factual knowledge (formulas,
255
relationships between variables) as indicated in Fig. 4.62. It also indicated that students
were more competent in using their background knowledge and experience gained
through the group sessions to analyse and solve new problems which suggested that
they had achieved deeper learning. These findings are in line with similar studies on
deep learning approaches (Ying, 2003; Fowler, 2004). Results found by this study
correspond well with findings from studies done on active learning approaches which
group discussions, sharing ideas and interpretations and using systematic enquiry-
With regard to the theoretical part of the course where students had to understand new
assisted in the improvement of the students’ knowledge retention ability. This can be as
a result of the way in which the students encountered new information and how the
new information was discussed and shared which made their understanding of the new
information more effective. From the scores in Fig. 4.63 it is quite evident that GEBL
helped the students in understanding new concepts, theories and enabled them to
256
and were able to reflect these process/processes on diagrams accurately. GEBL also
improved the students’ ability to deal with larger complex volumes of work successfully.
These results are in line with findings from other studies that active student-centred
thinking skills, group work, problem solving, the formulation of good questions,
analysing problems and developing solutions (see for example, Lee, 2004; Prince, 2004;
In addressing the third research question: ‘What would be the effect of a guided
communicate procedures and processes related to MTHE 2?’ the mean values from the
257
Students’ responses to the influence of GEBL on communication skills:
“In Thermodynamics there are a number of terms and well just terms you need
to know that you don’t really pick up if you do work without talking about the
work. So the fact that you were talking about the work helped you to understand
“It helped develop our communication skills because you get to speak out,
With regard to the above results and responses: During the Oral tests the majority of
the students could give a satisfactory answer to many of the questions, thereby
Students who were normally shy and not confident in using Thermodynamic terms
could express themselves and actively participate in technical discussions. Other studies
done on the impact of active learning in engineering education also found that it
corroborated by many researchers in the field (Weck, 2003; Zubair & Antar, 2004;
Charelvoix, 2008).
In addressing the fourth research question: ‘To what extent would the formulation and
258
use of key performance indicators (KPIs) be an effective tool for ascertaining students’
attainment of desired educational outcomes in MTHE 2?’ the mean values from the
With regard to the above results: The data collected from these KPI measurements
indicated a drop in achievement of outcomes from Test 1 to Test 1b with the traditional
lecturing approach as indicated in Fig. 4.64. The GEBL was introduced after Test 1b and
there was an improvement in achieving the outcomes from 50.65% to 51.85%. These
scores progressively improved over the remainder of the modules. There was no control
group in this study, so a comparison with traditional teaching and learning outcomes
could not be made. However these findings gave an indication of the extent to which
the outcomes of MTHE 2 had been achieved in the respective modules. Follow-up
studies can use these KPIs in a control/experimental group design to determine the
259
5.3 Conclusion
From the qualitative and quantitative data collected in this study and the data
In this study active learning had a positive impact on student learning and the
of overall scores. It was found that when students were more actively involved in the
learning process, they learned new concepts easier than what was in the past and
understood the work better. All types of presented data show these factors. Similar
views are corroborated by other researchers (Lee, 2004; Prince, 2004; Fuehne, 2007).
The students were also able to apply the information in new situations. This in turn
resulted in an improved academic performance. GEBL also exposed the students more
often to situations which required them to communicate and to use MTHE 2 terms
interview data in particular point to. This also assisted them in developing
communication skills. The assistance that active learning had on the improvement of
communication skills are supported also by other researchers in the field (De Weck et
From the twenty students in the GEBL group, 75% qualified for the final examination.
80% of those who wrote the final examination passed which resulted in 60% of the
original GEBL group who passed the course overall. The average pass rate for this
260
course with traditional teaching method was below 40% which indicated a significant
The KPIs that were developed can be used for future measurements of the
achievement of MTHE 2 course outcomes and will give an indication of the effectiveness
of the teaching and learning method used in terms of achieving the specified outcomes.
These KPIs can also be used for the other mechanical engineering courses which have
In conclusion, it is clear that GEBL improved student learning and the development of
professional skills in this study. However the degree to which this approach is more
effective than the traditional practices can only be determined through comparative
studies in future although the 60% pass of GEBL students when compared to 40% pass
for traditional method students show the better effectiveness of GEBL. There was also
related to thermodynamics. The measurements obtained from the KPIs gave feedback
outcomes in each section of the syllabus of MTHE 2. This can be used for future
improvement of teaching and learning methods. In summary, the aim and objectives
261
5.4 Recommendations
Lecturers need to pay more attention to the atmosphere which is created in the
classrooms. Students need to feel being welcomed and comfortable during a lecturing
session. Attention must be paid to the relationship between the lecturer and the
students. Although this should remain professional, the atmosphere created must allow
students to feel free to approach the lecturer. Lecturing venues should also be
equipped with re-groupable standing desks and chairs to allow for group work.
The lecturer supplies the students with GEBL notes prior to the commencement
of the lecture. The lecturer introduces new concepts, principles and theories in
MTHE 2 to students. Students listen and take the necessary notes. This part of
the lecture must be minimised to allow for maximum interaction from students;
The lecturer does an example with the whole class following the EBL approach.
The students are randomly divided into groups to avoid clicks to be formed
within any group. The students are then presented with a new problem to solve.
They work in groups and are given a few minutes to formulate the three to five
most relevant questions pertaining to the problem. This can be done by selecting
questions from the GEBL notes, formulating questions, interacting and discussing
The lecturer stops the whole class to get feedback from each group regarding
262
the questions they have formulated. Any irrelevant question or problems are
dealt with.
The students then use the information gathered from the questions and
lecturer moves between the groups and assists individuals or groups with
problems.
At the end of the time feedback is given from each group and problems are dealt
Students are given homework to do for the next lecture and the lecturer
motivate them to do the homework and also needs to check and ensure that
The models (see subsections 5.5 & 5.6 that follow) proposed below and the
efficiently.
263
5.5 Proposed Louw’s Model for Thermodynamics 2
Lecturer
1 2 3
2
1
Student 2
Student 1 Student 3
Student
group interaction
Student 5 Student 4
264
5.6 General Model
From the above model, a possible pragmatic general model can be implemented in an
inductive approach. Lecturers must pay attention to the time that they spend on
lecturing. This time must be kept to a minimum to allow more time for group-work.
model below):
The lecturer supplies the students with GEBL notes prior to the commencement
of the lecture. The lecturer introduces new concepts, principles and theories in
the particular course to students. Students listen and take the necessary notes.
This part of the lecture must be minimised to allow for maximum interaction
from students;
The lecturer does an example with the whole class following the EBL approach.
The students are randomly divided into groups to avoid clicks to be formed
within any group. The students are then presented with a new problem to solve.
They work in groups and are given a few minutes to formulate the three to five
most relevant questions pertaining to the problem. This can be done by selecting
questions from the GEBL notes, formulating questions, interacting and discussing
The lecturer stops the whole class to get feedback from each group regarding
the questions they have formulated. Any irrelevant question or problems are
265
dealt with.
The students then use the information gathered from the questions and
lecturer moves between the groups and assists individuals or groups with
problems.
At the end of the time feedback is given from each group and problems are dealt
266
5.7 Proposed Louw’s General Model for Engineering Courses
Lecturer
1 2 3
1
Students take part
in formulating 3
questions to
Students listen and
analyse problem
take notes
Student 2
Student 1 Student 3
Student
group interaction
Student 5 Student 4
267
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The opportunity granted by WSU’s Faculty of Education to enroll for this study, the
professional and academic support from WSU’s Directorate of Postgraduate Studies and
the financial support from WSU’s Directorate of Research Development are gratefully
acknowledged.
268
REFERENCES
Adams, J. T., Kaczmarczyk, S., Picton, P. & Demian, P., 2007. Improving problem
solving and encouraging creativity in engineering undergraduates. In:
International Conference on Engineering Education. 3-7 September 2007.
Portugal: Coimbra.
Alters, B. J. & Nelson, C. E., 2002. Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education.
International Journal of Organic Evolution, 56(10), pp.1891-1901.
Altuger, G., Tumkor, S. & Chassapis, C., 2009. Introduction to the mechanical
engineering discipline through hands-on product development case studies, US
– Turkey workshop on rapid technologies, 24 September 2009, pp.59-62.
Anderson, E. E., Taraban, R. & Sharma, M. P., 2005. Implementing and assessing
computer-based active learning materials in introductory thermodynamics.
International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(6), pp.1168-1176.
Aquirre, E., Jacmot, C., Milgrom, E., Raucent, B., Soucisse, A. & Vander Borght C.,
2001. Meeting the needs of our stake holders. In: Engineering a new engineering
curriculum at UC Louvain SEFI conference. 12-14 September 2001. Netherlands:
Copenhagen.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A. & Sorensen, C., 2010. Introduction to research in
education. 8th ed. Belmount, CA: Wadsworth.
Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M. & Nielsen, P. A., 1999. Action research. Communications
of the ACM, 42(1), pp.94-97.
Aziz, E. & Chassapis, C., 2008. Introduction to the ME curriculum through product
engineering case studies. In: 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in education conference,
22-25 October 2008. USA: Saratoga Springs, NY.
Bales, E., 1996. Corporate universities versus traditional universities: friends or foes?
Third annual EDINEB (Educational Innovations in Economics and Business)
269
international conference. USA: Orlando, Florida.
Bardet, J., & Ragusa, G., 2009. Analysis of body of knowledge in civil engineering.
American Society for Engineering Education.
Bless, C., Higson-Smith, C. & Kagee, A., 2006. Fundamental of social research: An
african perspective. 4th ed. Cape Town: Juta.
Boles, W., Beck, H. & Hargreaves, D., 2005. Deploying Bloom’s taxonomy in a work
integrated learning environment, ASEE/AAEE 4th global colloquium on
engineering education.
Borrego, M., Douglas, E. P. & Amelink, C. T., 2009. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed
research methods in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education,
98(1), pp.53-66.
Boud, D. & Felleti, G., 1998. The challenge of problem-based learning. 2nd ed.
London: Routledge.
Bower, K. C., Mays, T. W. & Miller, C. M., 2004. Small group, self-directed problem
based learning development in a traditional engineering program. In: 34th
ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference. 20-23 October 2004. GA:
Savannah.
Brannick, T. & Coghlan, D., 2007. In defense of being ‘native’: The case for insider
academic research. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), pp.59-74.
Brodie, L. & Gibbings, P., 2007. Developing problem based learning communities in
virtual space. In: Connected 2007 international conference on design
education. 9-12 July 2007. Australia: Sydney.
Bryman, A. ed., 1989. Research methods and organization studies. London: Routledge.
Burns, N. & Grove, S. K., 2004. The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique, and
utilization. 5th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders.
270
Carbone, A. C., Conway, D. & Farr, G., 2004. Techniques for effective tertiary
teaching, school of computer science and software engineering, Monash
University.
Carmine, E. G. & Zeller, R. A., 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. London: Sage.
Case, J. M. & Marshall, D., 2009. Approaches to learning. In: Tight, M., Huisman, J.,
Mok, K. H. & Morpew, C. ed. The Routledge International Handbook of Higher
Education. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
Castles, R., Lohani, V. K. & Kachroo, P., 2009. Utilizing hands-on learning to facilitate
progression through Bloom’s taxonomy within the first semester. In: 39th
ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, 18-21 October 2009. TX: San
Antonio.
Chang, R. L., Stern, L., Sondergaard, H. & Hadgraft, R., 2009. Places for learning
engineering: A preliminary report on informal learning spaces. In: Proceedings
of the research in engineering education symposium, 2009. Australia: Palm
Cove, QLD.
Charlevoix, D., Strey, S. & Mills, C., 2009. Design and implementation of enquiry-based,
technology-rich learning activities in a large enrollment blended learning course.
Journal of the Research Centre for Educational Technology, 5(3), pp.15-28.
Council on Higher Education, 2007. Higher education monitor, a case for improving
teaching and learning in South African higher education, HE Monitor no.6, pp.26-
27.
Craig, A., Joines, J., Miller, C., Miller, T., Raubenheimer, D., Rouskas, G., Silverberg, L.
& Wiebe, E., 2008. Computing across curricula. In: ASEE Annual conference.
June 2008. USA: Pittsburgh, PA.
Creswell, J. W., 2003. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method
approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cronbach, L. J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
Psychometrika, 16, pp.297-334.
271
Davis, B. G., 1993. Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Davis, C. & Wilcock, E., 2008. Teaching materials using case studies, UK centre for
materials education.
De Graaf, E., Saunders-Smits, G. & Nieweg, M., 2005. Research and practice of active
learning in engineering education. 1st ed. Netherlands: Amsterdam University
Press.
Delaney, K. & Kelleher, J., 2008. Real-world process design for mechanical engineering
students: A case study of PBL in Dublin Institute of Technology. In: International
symposium for engineering education, ISEE-08. Ireland: Dublin.
De La Harpe, B. & Radloff, A., 2007. The value of assessing learning strategies for
effective learning and teaching: strengthening the partnership between learners
and teachers. Curtin business school, Curtin University of Technology. Faculty of
Life Sciences, RMIT University.
De Weck, O. L., Young, P. W. & Adams, D., 2003. The three principles of powered
flight: An active learning approach. In: American society for engineering
education annual conference & exposition. 22-25 June 2003. USA: Nashville,
Tennessee.
Ditcher, A. K., 2001. Effective teaching and learning in higher education, with
particular reference to the undergraduate education of professional engineers.
International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(1), pp.24-29.
Donath, L., Spray, R., Thompson, N. S., Alford, E. M., Craig, N. & Matthews, M. A.,
2005. Characterizing discourse among undergraduate researchers in an
enquiry-based community of practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(3),
pp.403-417.
Druckman, D., 2005. Doing research: methods of enquiry for conflict analysis.
London: Sage.
Elshorgaby, A. & Schonwetter, D. J., 2002. Engineering morphing: bridging the gap
272
between classroom teaching and the engineering profession. International
Journal of Engineering Education, 18(3), pp.295-300.
Elston, R. & Johnson, W., 1994. Populations, samples and study design. In: Essentials
of biostatistics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Davis Company.
Farrell, S. & Hesketh R. P., 2000. An inductive approach to heat and mass transfer. In:
American society for engineering education annual conference. USA: Glassboro,
New Jersey.
Felder, R. M. & Brent, R., 2003. Learning by doing. Chemical Engineering Education,
37(4), pp.282-283.
Felder, R. M. & Brent, R., 2010. The national effective teaching institute: assessment
of impact and implications for faculty development. Journal of Engineering
Education, 99(2), pp.121-134.
Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K., 1988. Learning and teaching styles in engineering
education. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), pp.674-681.
Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E. & Rugarcia, A., 2000. The future of engineering
education II: teaching methods that work. Chemical Engineering Education,
34(1), pp.26-39.
Ferreira, J. M. & Mueller, D., 2004. The Marvel EU project: a social constructivist
approach to remote experimentation.
Fink, L. D., 2003. What is “Significant Learning”? Author of creating significant learning
experiences: an integrated approach to designing college courses. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Flick, U., 2006. An introduction to qualitative research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
Floyd, K. S., Harrington, S. J. & Santiago J., 2009. The effect of engagement and
perceived course value on deep and surface learning strategies. Informing
Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 12, pp.181-
190.
273
Fowler, D. A., 2004. Defining and determining the impact of a freshman engineering
student’s approach to learning (surface versus deep). Ph. D. Texas: A & M
University.
Fuehne, J., 2007. Experience with active learning, frequent assessment and student
evaluations. In: American society for engineering education Illinois-Indiana
section conference. Spring 2007. USA: Indianapolis, Indiana.
Gaither, G., Nedwek, B. P. & Neal, J. E., 1994. Measuring up: the promises and pitfalls
of performance indicators in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education
Report Series, 94-5, volume 23-5.
Available at: http://www.ntlf.com/html/lib/bib/94-5dig.htm
Goldfinch, T., Carew, A. L. & McCarthy, T., 2008. Improving learning in engineering
mechanics: the significance of understanding. In: Australasian association for
engineering education conference. Australia: Yeppoon, Queensland.
Hanrahan, H., 2007. Developing engineering qualifications within the South African
NQF: a view from ECSA. In: Proceedings of the 7th Q-Africa conference.
Available at: http://
www.saqa.org.za/docs/conference/qafrica/2007/developing.pdf
Hardjito, D., 2010. The use of scaffolding approach to enhance students’ engagement
in learning structural analysis. International Education Studies, 3(1), pp.130-135.
Hay, D. B., 2007. Using concept maps to measure deep, surface and non-learning
outcomes. Studies in higher education, 32(1), pp.39-57.
274
Hester, E. L., 1995. Successful marketing research: the complete guide to getting and
using essential information about your customers and competitors. Canada:
Wiley & Sons.
Hesketh, R. P., Farrell, S. & Slater C. S., 2002. The role of experiments in inductive
learning. In: Proceedings of the American society for engineering education
annual conference & exposition. June 2002. Canada: Montreal.
Heukelom, F., 2009. Origin and interpretation of internal and external validity in
economics. Nijmegen center for economics, working paper 09-111, August
2009.
Available at: http://www.ru.nl/nice/workingpapers
Hodkinson, P., 2005. ‘Insider Research’ in the study of youth cultures. Journal of Youth
Studies, June 2005, 8(2), pp.131-149.
Holford, K. M. & Moore, C. J., 1994. Engineers fit for industry. Staff and educational
development association, the new academic volume 3(1993/4), Vol. 3.2.
Holloway, I., 1997. Basic concepts for qualitative research. New Jersey: Wiley –
Blackwell.
Huet, S., Mourtos, N. J., Costa, N., Pacheco, O. & Tavares, J., 2007. Models for
research-based teaching in engineering courses: a case study at the University of
Aveiro (PT) and San Jose University (USA). In: International conference on
engineering education. 3-7 September 2007. Portugal: Coimbra.
Huizer, G., 1997. Participatory action research and people's participation: introduction
and case studies.
Available at:
http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/SUSTANDARDEV/PPdirect/PPre0020.htm
Hyslop-Margison, E. J. & Strobel, J., 2008. Open forum, constructivism and education:
misunderstandings and pedagogical implications. The Teacher Educator, 43,
pp.72-86.
275
Irish, R., 1999. Engineering thinking: using Benjamin Bloom and William Perry to design
assignments. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 3(2), pp.83-102.
Jollands, M., McCallum, N. & Bondy, J., 2009. If students want feedback why don’t they
collect their assignments? In: 20th Australasian association for engineering
education conference. 6-9 December 2009. Australia: Adelaide.
Jones, R. C., 1998. World expertise llc, global status of engineering education,
outcomes of the global congress on engineering education at Cracow, Poland.
Available at: http://www.worldexpertise.com/global_status_of_engineering_edu.htm
Joughin, G., 2003. Oral assessment from the learner’s perspective: the experience of
oral assessment in the post-compulsory education. Ph. D. Brisbane: Griffith
University.
Available at: http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/uploads/approved/adt-
QGU20031125.091403/public/02Whole.pdf
Junglas, P., 2006. Simulation programs for teaching thermodynamics. Global Journal of
Engineering Education, 10(2), pp.175-180.
Kabir, K. B., Khan, M. S. & Mahmud, I., 2008. Novel ideas on engineering education in
Bangladesh. Chemical Engineering Research Bulletin, (12), pp.11-19.
Kapadia, R. J., 2008. Teaching and Learning Styles in Engineering Education. In: 38th
ASEEIEEE frontiers in education conference. 22-25 October 2008. USA:
Saratoga Spring, New York.
Kapranos, P., 2007. 21st Century teaching & learning: Kolb’s cycle & reflective thinking
as part of teaching, creativity, innovation, enterprise and ethics to engineers.
In: International symposium for engineering education 2007. Ireland: Dublin.
Kaw, A. K., Besterfield, G. H. & Eison, J., 2005. Assessment of a web-enhanced course
in numerical methods. International Journal on Engineering Education, 21 July,
21(4), pp.712-722.
276
Kaw, A. & Garapati, S., 2010. Development of digital audiovisual lectures for an
engineering course: a you tube experience. In: American society for engineering
education southeast section conference. USA: South Florida.
Killen, R., 2006. Effective teaching strategies: lessons from research and practice. 4th
ed. Spain: Social Science Press.
Kirk, J. & Miller, M. L., 1986. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. 8th ed.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kitto, K. L., 2009. Using cooperative writing and oral presentations as peer teaching -
evaluating the effectiveness of elements of inductive teaching and social
constructivism on student outcomes. In: 39th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education
conference. 18-21 October 2009. Texas: San Antonio.
Klentschy, M., & Thompson, L., 2008. Scaffolding science enquiry through lesson
design: using a research-based template to plan classroom instruction.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Kuri, N. P., 2000. Kolb’s learning cycle: an alternative strategy for engineering
education.
Available at: http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE1998/ICEE/papers/225.pdf
Lamancusa, J. S., Zayas, J. L., Soyster, A. L., Morell, L. & Jorgensen, J., 2008. The
learning factory: industry-partnered active learning. Journal of Engineering
Education, 15 May, 97(1), pp.1-15.
Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., Volkwein, J. F. & Peterson, G. D., 2006. The changing
face of engineering education. The Bridge, 36(2), pp.5-13.
Lee, V. S., 2004. Teaching and learning through enquiry: a guidebook for institutions
and instructors. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
277
Linsey, J., Talley, A., White, C. & Jensen, D., 2009. From tootsie rolls to broken bones:
an innovative approach for active learning in mechanics of materials. In:
American Society for Engineering Education - Advances in Engineering Education,
1(3), pp.18-19.
Litzinger, T. A., Lattuca, L. R. & Hadgraft, R. G., 2011. Engineering education and the
development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), pp.123-150.
Lublin, J., 2003. Deep, surface and strategic approaches to learning. centre for
teaching and learning good practice in teaching and learning, University
College Dublin, pp.1-11.
Ma, A. W. W., 2009. Computer supported collaborative learning and higher order
thinking skills: a case study of textile studies. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-
Learning and Learning Objects, 5, pp.145-167.
Maier, P., Barnett, L., Warren, A. & Brunner, D., 1998. Using technology in teaching
and learning. New York: Routledge.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B., 2006. Designing qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martin, D. J., 2009. Elementary science methods: a constructivist approach. 5th ed.
Belmount, CA: Wadsworth.
Martin, R., Maytham, B., Case, J. & Fraser, D., 2005. Engineering graduates’
perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. European
Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), pp.167-180.
Materu, P. N., 2007. Higher education quality assurance in Sub Saharan Africa: status,
challenges, opportunities, and promising practices. Washington: The World
Bank.
McKenna, A. F., Yalvac, B. & Light, G. J., 2009. The Role of collaborative reflection on
shaping engineering faculty teaching approaches. Journal of Engineering
Education, 98, pp.17-26.
Merriam, S. B., 1995. What can you tell from an N of 1?: issues of validity and
reliability in qualitative research – theory to practice. PAACE Journal of Lifelong
Learning, 4, pp.51-60.
278
Michaelides, I., Eleftheriou, P. & Muller, D., 2004. A remotely accesseble solar energy
laboratory - a distributed learning experience. In: 1st Remote engineering and
virtual instrumentation international symposium (REV'04), 28-29 September
2004. Austria: Villach.
Naher, S., Brabazon, D. & Looney, L., 2008. Affects of student attendance on
performance in undergraduate materials and manufacturing modules.
International symposium for engineering education. 8-10 September. Ireland:
Dublin.
Nicklow, J., Kowalchuk, R., Gupta, L., Tezcan, J. & Mathias, J., 2009. A short-term
assessment of a multi-faceted engineering retention program, Southern Illinois
University. In: 39th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference. 18-21
October 2009. TX: San Antonio.
Nicol, D. J. & Boyle, J. T., 2003. Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large
classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom.
Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), pp.457-473.
Nilson, L. B., 2010. Teaching at its best: a research-based resource for college
instructors. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
O'Dwyer, A., 2008. Learning styles of first year level 7 electrical and mechanical
engineering students at DIT. In: Proceedings of the international symposium for
engineering education ISEE-08, 1 January, pp.69-74.
O’Dwyer, A., 2009. Analysis of learning styles of first year engineering students on two
Level 7 programmes. In: All-Ireland society for higher education (AISHE)
conference. Ireland: NUI, Maynooth.
279
Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Trevisan, M. S. & Brown, A. H., 2007.
Teaching strategies: a guide to effective instruction. 9th ed. Boston, MA:
Wadsworth.
Pendergrass, N. A., Kowalczyk, R. E., Dowd, J. P., Laoulache, R. N., Nelles, W., Golen,
J. A. & Fowler, E., 1999. Improving first-year engineering education. In: 29th
ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, 10-13 November 1999. USA: San
Juan, Puerto Rico.
Prince, M., 2004. Does active learning work? Review of research, department of
chemical engineering Bucknell University. Journal of Engineering Education
93(3), pp.223-231.
Prince, M. J. & Felder, R. J., 2006. Inductive teaching and learning methods:
definitions, comparisons and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education,
95(2), pp.123-138.
Prince, M. & Hoyt, B., 2002. Helping students make the transition from novice to expert
problem-solvers. In: 32nd ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference. 6-9
November 2002. USA: Boston, MA.
Pundak, D., Herscovitz, O., Shacham, M. & Wiser-Biton, R., (2009) Instructors' attitudes
toward active learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning
Objects, (5), pp.215-226.
Qualters, D. M., Sheahan, T. C. Mason, E. J., Navick, D. S. & Dixon M., 2008. Improving
learning in first-year engineering courses through interdisciplinary collaborative
assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), pp.37-45.
Reagan, T. G. & Osborn, T. A., 2002. The foreign language educator in society:
toward a critical pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
280
Reason, P., 1994. Three approaches to participative enquiry. Research and action
enquiry: three approaches to participative enquiry. Prepared for the handbook
of qualitative research, edited by Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. Thousand Oaks:
Sage.
Reason, P. & Bradbury, H., 2008. The Sage handbook of action research: participative
enquiry and practice. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Reeves, J., Courter, S., Nickels, K., Noyce, D., Pearce, A., Schaefer, L.,
Wickramasinghe, R. & Lyle, R., 1999. Change agents: immediately
implementable teaching and educational hints from the engineering education
scholars program. In: American society for engineering education annual
conference. 20-23 June 1999. USA: Charlotte, North Carolina.
Richards, L. G. & Schnittka, C. G., 2007. Workshop - bringing engineering into middle
schools: learning science and math through guided enquiry and engineering
design. In: 37th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference. 10-13 October
2007. USA: Milwaukee, WI.
Ritchie, J., Zwi, A. B., Blignault, I., Bunde-Birouste, A. & Silove, D., 2009. Insider-
outsider positions in health-development research: reflections for practice.
Development in Practice, 19(1), pp.106-112.
Robbins, D. & Ardebili, M., 2006. Engineering students’ conceptions of heat and
temperature pre and post thermodynamics course. American Society of
Engineering Education, pp.1-9.
Roe, B. E. & Just, D. R., 2009. Internal and external validity in economics research:
tradeoffs between experiments, field experiments, natural experiments and
field data. In: 2009 ASSA annual meeting. USA: San Francisco, CA.
Rose, C. P., Kumar, R., Aleven, V., Robinson, A. & Wu, C., 2006. Cycle talk: data driven
design of support for simulation based learning. International Journal of
Artificial Intelligence in Education Special Issue of the Best of ITS ’04, 16,
pp.195-223.
Rugarcia, A., Felder R. M., Woods D. R. & Stice J. E., 2000. The future of engineering
education. 1. A vision for a new century. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1),
pp.16-25.
281
Rutkowski, J., Moscinska, K. & Jantos, P., 2010. Application of Bloom’s taxonomy for
increasing teaching efficiency – case study. In: International conference on
engineering education. 18-22 July 2010. Poland: Gliwice.
Salmi, J., 2001. Tertiary education in the 21st century: challenges and opportunities.
Journal of the Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education,
13(2), pp.105-131.
Savage, R. N., Chen, K. C. & Vanasupa, L., 2007. Integrating project-based learning
through-out the undergraduate engineering curriculum, submitted to the J.
STEM education, October 2006.
Schofield, A., 2007. The Higher education academy - embedding strategies to enhance
learning and teaching in Scottish HEIs: an approach to self-assessment.
Spronken-Smith, R., Angelo, T., Matthews, H., O’Steen, B. & Robertson, J., 2007. How
Effective is enquiry-based learning in linking teaching and research?
Available at: http://portal-live.solent.ac.uk/university/rtconference/colloquium_papers.aspx
Stappenbelt, B., 2010. The influence of action learning on student perception and
performance. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 16(1), pp.1-12.
Strangman, N. & Hall, T. E., 2004. Background knowledge, MA: national center on
accessing the general curriculum.
Available at: http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_backknowledge.html
282
Su, K. D., 2008. An integrated science course designed with information
communication technologies to enhance university students’ learning
performance. Computers & Education, 51(2008), pp.1365-1374.
Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com
Taraban, R., Anderson, E. E., De Finis, A., Brown, A. G., Weigold, A. & Sharma, M. P.,
2007. First steps in understanding engineering students’ growth of conceptual
and procedural knowledge in an interactive learning context. Journal of
Engineering Education, 96(1), pp.57-68.
Terry, R. E. & Harb, J. N., 1993. Kolb, Bloom, creativity, and engineering design. In:
ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 20-24 June 1993. USA: Illinois-Urbana.
Tesch, R., 1990. Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools. London:
Routledge.
Thompson, N. S., Alford, E. M., Liao, C., Johnson, R. & Matthews, M. A., 2005.
Integrating undergraduate research into engineering: a communications
approach to holistic education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(3), pp.297-
307.
Tinker, C. & Armstrong, N., 2008. From the outside looking in: how an awareness of
difference can benefit the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report,
(13)1, pp.53-60.
Tharp, R. & Gallimore, R., 1988. Rousing minds to life. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Tully, M. F. & Clarke, D. P., 2008. Use of the infinity project to improve student
recruitment and retention on university engineering programmes and
apprenticeship training in Ireland. In: International conference on engineering
education, 2008. Hungary: Budapest.
Uziak, J., Oladiran, M. T. & Moalosi, R., 2010. Reviewing and developing course
descriptions to comply with accreditation requirements. Global Journal of
Engineering Education, 12(1), pp.30-37.
van Niekerk, W., Mentz, E. & Smit, W., 2011. Co-operative learning in
thermodynamics: solving problems in pairs. In: Proceedings of the 1st Biennial
283
conference of the South African society for engineering. 10-12 August 2011.
SA: Stellenbosch.
Vlasceanu, L., Grunberg, L. & Parlea, D., 2007. Quality assurance and accreditation: a
glossary of basic terms and definitions. UNESCO-CEPES 2007. Romania:
Bucharest.
Woollacott, L., 2011. MIGs: Mediated interaction groups for enhancing learning among
engineering students. In: Proceedings of the 1st Biennial conference of the
South African society for engineering. 10-12 August 2011. SA: Stellenbosch.
Yaman, S., 2005. Teacher learning and change: consistency between personal
theories and behaviours. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education,
1(1), pp.24-47.
Ying, Y., 2003. Using problem-based teaching and problem-based learning to improve
the teaching of electrochemistry. The China Papers, pp.42-47.
Zubair, S. M. & Antar, M. A., 2004. Project-based teaching and learning in thermo-
fluid courses.
Available at: http://www.engconfintl.org/8axabstracts/Session%205A/rees08_submission_84.doc
Żywno, M. S., 2003. Hypermedia instruction and learning outcomes at different levels
of Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive domain. Global Journal of Engineering
Education, 7(1), pp.59-70.
284
APPENDICES
285
Appendix 2 – Qualitative interviews with students participating in GEBL
Interview schedule
The interview will be based on the students involved with GEBL group sessions and who
made use of the MTHE2 booklet on enquiry learning. The purpose of the interview will
be to determine the students experience and opinions with regard to this method of
teaching. The interviews will be approximately twenty minutes.
Please state for the record your Name, Surname, Age, Race, Gender, Student number
and whether you were enrolled for MTHE2 with Mr Louw.
Could you kindly confirm that you were thoroughly briefed about the purpose of this
interview, that you received a letter explaining its purpose and that you signed an
informed consent form. You also realise that your participation is voluntary and that you
are under no obligation to answer all the questions and that you may withdraw at any
time during the interview.
Items Follow-up
286
Item 1a If yes, explain why the If no, explain why not.
group sessions made
The group sessions motivated you you feel responsible to
to come prepared to class. come prepared to the
next class?
287
enquiry based approach did not help.
When working alone the enquiry helped you in analysing
based approach helped me to problems when working What could have been
analyse problems effectively. on your own. done to change this?
288
Did the systematic
approach in analysing a
problem together with
your better
understanding of the
course content made
you feel confident that
you are on the correct
track?
289
Item 7 If yes, explain how If no, explain why it did
these additional not help.
The Thermodynamics booklet’s questions with answers
additional questions and answers helped you understand What can be done to
helped me to understand and and analyse problems make the booklet more
analyse new problems better. better. helpful in understanding
and analysing
Did the additional problems?
questions with answers
helped you to develop
the skill to interpret and
analyse new more
complex problems
easier?
290
understand other courses better. courses better. What intervention can
help you understand
How will you use this the other courses
approach to make other better?
courses easier to
understand?
291
Appendix 3 – Formative assessment 1 (semester test 1)
THERMODYNAMICS 2
SUBJECT CODE: 81908922
Student No:__________________
EXAMINER: C LOUW
Surname:____________________
MARKS: 46
Group:______________________
TIME: 90 min
TEST 1
FEBRUARY 2010
Read the problems carefully and answer the questions in the respective spaces
on the answer sheet:
QUESTION 1
An experiment was conducted with a certain gas. It was found that when the
gas is maintained in a constant volume container, 70 kJ/kg of energy are
required to raise the temperature 830C. It is known that = 1,5 for the gas.
1.1 Analyse this question and make a neat drawing of the process before
292
and after the energy was supplied. Indicate all relevant detail
clearly. Explain which variables changed and which ones
remained unchanged during this process;_____________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
(7)
1.2 the specific heat capacity at constant pressure for the gas;_______
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
(8)
Explain and calculate:
(6)
QUESTION 2
294
P
V
(11)
Explain and calculate:
(10)
[21]
295
Appendix 4 – Formative assessment 1b (semester test 1b)
THERMODYNAMICS 2
SUBJECT CODE: 81908922
Student No:__________________
Examiner: C Louw
Surname:____________________
MARKS: 85
Group:______________________
TIME: 2 Hrs
TEST 1b
February 2010
Read the problems carefully and answer the questions in the respective spaces
on the answer sheet:
QUESTION 1
Heat supplied:
296
initial temperature = 270C
initial pressure 200kPa
V1 = 0.2m3
V2 = 0.5m3
P1 = P2
Compression:
T3 = 6000C
V3 = V1
Solution:
297
1.2 Reflect the process or processes on the pressure-volume diagram,
with all given information clearly indicated;
P
V
(7)
1.4 the amount of heat removed from the air to return it to the initial
condition;_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
298
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
(9)
[41]
QUESTION 2
Solution:
2.1 Analyse this question and make a neat pressure-volume diagram of the
process with all relevant detail indicated clearly. Explain why the values
changed the way they did (e.g. if volume decreased explain why). Explain
also the type of process or processes involved in the question;
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
299
P
V
(15)
300
Appendix 5 – Formative assessment 2 (semester test 2)
THERMODYNAMICS 2
SUBJECT CODE: 81908922
Student No:__________________
Examiner: C Louw
Surname:____________________
MARKS: 55
TIME: 1hr
SEMESTER TEST 2
19 MARCH 2010
Read the problems carefully and answer the questions in the respective spaces
on the answer sheet:
QUESTION 1
Air is compressed from 100kPa and 220C to a pressure of 1MPa while being
cooled at a rate of 16kJ/kg by circulating water through the compressor
casing. The volume flow rate of the air at inlet conditions is 150m3/min and
the power input to the compressor is 500kW. Determine:
301
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________(4)
1.2 Draw a sketch of the device used in the question with all given
information reflected as well as directions of flow;
(3)
1.5 How does the outlet temperature compare to the inlet temperature and what
causes this difference?
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
302
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________(5)
1.6 Explain the importance of cooling the compressor during operation and
also explain what will be the effect if cooling is not done effectively:
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________(3)
[23]
QUESTION 2
A furnace gas has the following volumetric analysis: H2 15%, CO 24%, CO2 6%,
CH4 12%, O2 3% and N2 40%. Calculate the volumetric analysis of the dry
products of combustion with 30% excess air.
303
products of combustion;________________________________________
___________________________________________________________(3)
2.5 Tabulate your results and explain what these values mean:
(12)
[32]
304
Appendix 6 – Formative assessment 3 (semester test 3)
TIME: 3 HRS
SEMESTER – TEST 3
April 2010
Read the problems carefully and answer the questions in the respective spaces
on the answer sheet:
QUESTION 1
305
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________(4)
P T
V S
(5)
1.4 the percentage of heat flow which is converted into work done;
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
(7)
306
Explain and determine the following:
QUESTION 2
Feed water at 290C is fed to a boiler at a rate of 500 l/h. The isobaric boiler
pressure is 700kPa. The super-heater receives the steam which is 90% dry
and superheats the steam to 4000C.
P T
V S
(5)
307
Explain and determine the following:
2.2.1 evaporator;
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
(8)
2.2.2 super-heater.
_____________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
(7)
2.3 Calculate the overall efficiency of the plant for a fuel consumption of
70kg/hr. The calorific value of the fuel is 38MJ/kg.
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
(6)
[26]
308
QUESTION 3
3.2 Make a neat diagram of the unit and indicate the given information clearly;
(4)
[20]
309
QUESTION 4
A Rankine cycle power plant has a feed pump, economiser, steam generator,
super-heater, turbine and condenser. Steam enters the turbine at 800kPa and
4000C. Steam leaves the turbine at 40kPa after undergoing reverseble
adiabatic expansion through the turbine. The steam is condensed to saturated
liquid and is pumped back through the system.
4.1 Draw a detailed flow diagram of this plant fully labelled; (4)
310
Explain and determine the following:
311
Appendix 7 – Formative assessment (oral test)
Marks
THERMODYNAMICS 2
SUBJECT CODE: 81908922
Student No:__________________
EXAMINER: C LOUW
Surname:____________________
TIME: 15 MIN.
SCHEDULED ORAL TEST QUESTIONNAIRE
MAY 2010
Non-flow processes
______
5
312
Flow processes
8. Under which conditions are the kinetic energy, heat flow and
work done neglected when applying this equation? 3–
Combustion ______
5
9. What is meant by ‘the minimum amount of oxygen’? 1–
12. Explain the difference between the HCV and LCV of active
elements. 2–
313
14. What is the difference in terms of POC when ma and when mT
is supplied? 4 -
18. Explain the difference between the HCV and LCV of active
elements. 2–
21. Explain the different phases of steam and when these ______
conditions are reached. 2– 5
314
23. Explain why calorimeters are used. Why is this measurement
important? 3–
Boiler plant
315
mean? 1–
35.How does the wrong calorific value of the fuel affect the
performance of the boiler plant? 4–
Rankine cycle
316
Condensers
46. Explain the difference between a dry and a wet air pump. 4–
PERCENTAGE: __
SIGN:___________
______
5
______
35
317
Appendix 8 – Summative assessment (final examination)
SUBJECT : THERMODYNAMICS II
MAIN EXAMINATION
EXAMINER : C. LOUW
MODERATOR : I. SUNJKA
318
2. START EACH QUESTION ON A NEW
PAGE.
3. MARK QUESTIONS CLEARLY.
DURATION : 3 HOURS
319
PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES SUBJECT: THERMODYNAMICS II
QUESTION 1
Calculate:
320
1.6 the overall change in enthalpy of the gas. (2)
QUESTION 2
QUESTION 2
Determine:
2.2 the work done by the steam during the heating process; (8)
2.4 the pressure at which the steam becomes just dry. (2)
321
2.5 Draw a detailed pressure-volume and temperature-entropy
diagram of the complete process reflecting all symbols.
Indicate the area which represents the work done during
the heating process as well as the area which represents
the heat flow during the cooling process. (5)
[24]
QUESTION 3
Calculate:
3.2 the heat absorbed by the steam in the evaporator in kW; (4)
322
3.4 the heat absorbed by the air in the air pre-heater in kJ/hr; (3)
QUESTION 3
3.6 Study the attached flow diagram, and fill in the relevant
information (symbols and values) on the diagram. Indicate
on the diagram corrections which need to be made to
reflect the plant described in the question. (6)
[23]
QUESTION 4
323
4.2 Explain in terms running cost why it was an improvement
to install a dry air pump. (5)
Calculate:
4.3 the extra amount of condensate lost when using a wet air
pump in kg/hr; (10)
QUESTION 5
Calculate:
5.3 What will be the effect in terms of available heat and the
type of combustion products, if insufficient air was
supplied to the combustion chamber? (4)
[20]
324
Appendix 9 – KPIs for measuring achievement in outcomes with formative
assessments 1, 2 and 3
THERMODYNAMICS 2
SUBJECT CODE: 81908922
EXAMINER: C LOUW
Student No:__________________
Surname:____________________
325
allocation
Point Ou Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of
s t 2 3 1 2 1 3, 4, 5 0 1, 2, 3
of 3 4 2 4, 5, 6 etc etc
1 1 4 5 etc
2 2 5 6 3 5, 6, 7
3 3 6 7 etc
4 4 7 8 4 6, 7, 8
5 5 8 9 etc
6 6 9 10 5 7, 8, 9
7 7 10 11 etc
8 8 Etc etc 6 8, 9, 10
9 9 etc
10 10
11 11
etc etc
326
Analytical Minor Some Major Completely
solution calculation/substitu calculation/substitu calculation/substitu incorrect
completely tion errors tion errors tion errors calculation/substitu
correct tion
Student made one Student made more Student have one
error than one error correct
calculation/substitu
tion
5 4 3 2 1
Full mark Full mark allocation Full mark allocation Full mark allocation Full mark allocation
allocation
Point Ou Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of
s t 2 3 1 2 1 3, 4, 5 0 1, 2, 3
of 3 4 2 4, 5, 6 etc etc
1 1 4 5 etc
2 2 5 6 3 5, 6, 7
3 3 6 7 etc
4 4 7 8 4 6, 7, 8
5 5 8 9 etc
6 6 9 10 5 7, 8, 9
7 7 10 11 etc
8 8 etc etc 6 8, 9, 10
9 9 etc etc
10 10
11 11
etc etc
327
10 10 4 6, 7, 8
11 11 etc
etc etc 4.5 6, 7, 8
etc
5 7, 8, 9
etc
5.5 7, 8, 9
etc
6 8, 9, 10
etc
6.5 8, 9 10
etc etc
SCORE:
Students Considere Considered most Considered some Considered one Considered no
’ ability d all crucial factors crucial factors crucial factor crucial factors
to crucial
analyse factors
a 5 4 3 2 1
problem Full mark Full mark allocation Full mark allocation Full mark allocation Full mark allocation
and allocation
produce
Point Ou Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of
a
s t 2 3 1 2 1 3, 4, 5 0 1, 2, 3
solution,
of 3 4 2 4, 5, 6 etc etc
taking
1 1 4 5 etc
into
2 2 5 6 3 5, 6, 7
account
3 3 6 7 etc
crucial
4 4 7 8 4 6, 7, 8
factors
5 5 8 9 etc
in a
6 6 9 10 5 7, 8, 9
systemat
7 7 10 11 etc
ic
8 8 etc etc 6 8, 9, 10
approac
9 9 etc etc
h
10 10
towards
11 11
the
etc etc
solution.
328
1 1 3.5 4 etc
2 2 4.5 5 2 4, 5, 6
3 3 5.5 6 etc
4 4 6.5 7 2.5 4, 5, 6
5 5 7.5 8 etc
6 6 8.5 9 3 5, 6, 7
7 7 9.5 10 etc
8 8 10.5 11 3.5 5, 6, 7
9 9 etc etc etc
10 10 4 6, 7, 8
11 11 etc
etc etc 4.5 6, 7, 8
etc
5 7, 8, 9
etc
5.5 7, 8, 9
etc
6 8, 9, 10
etc
6.5 8, 9 10
etc etc
SCORE:
329
Appendix 10 – KPIs for measuring achievement of outcomes of oral test 1
THERMODYNAMICS 2
SUBJECT CODE: 81908922
EXAMINER: C LOUW
Student No:__________________
MARKS:
Surname:____________________
330
maintenance 8 8 8.5 9 3 5, 6, 7
procedures in 9 9 9.5 10 etc
specific 10 10 10.5 11 3.5 5, 6, 7
components. 11 11 etc etc etc
etc etc 4 6, 7, 8
etc
4.5 6, 7, 8
etc
5 7, 8, 9
etc
5.5 7, 8, 9
etc
6 8, 9, 10
etc
6.5 8, 9, 10
etc etc
331
6 8, 9, 10
etc
6.5 8, 9, 10
etc etc
SCORE:
Students’ ability Completely Minor problems Considerable Major problems in Unable to
to perform able to in discussion, problems in discussion, discuss,
technical discuss, demonstration discussion, demonstration or demonstrate
discussions on demonstrate or explanation demonstration or explanation of or explain
MTHE 2 topics, or explain of MTHE 2 explanation of MTHE 2 topics MTHE 2 topics
communicates MTHE 2 topics topics clearly MTHE 2 topics clearly clearly
fluently, clearly clearly
explains and 5 4 3 2 1
demonstrates
concepts
effectively in
MTHE 2.
Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of
1 1 1.5 2 1 2 0.5 1, 2, 3 0 1, 2, 3
2 2 2.5 3 1.5 3, 4, 5 etc etc
3 3 3.5 4 etc
4 4 4.5 5 2 4, 5, 6
5 5 5.5 6 etc
6 6 6.5 7 2.5 4, 5, 6
7 7 7.5 8 etc
8 8 8.5 9 3 5, 6, 7
9 9 9.5 10 etc
10 10 10.5 11 3.5 5, 6, 7
11 11 etc etc etc
etc etc 4 6, 7, 8
etc
4.5 6, 7, 8
etc
5 7, 8, 9
etc
5.5 7, 8, 9
etc
6 8, 9, 10
etc
6.5 8, 9, 10
etc etc
SCORE:
332
Appendix 11 – KPIs for measuring achievement of outcomes of final
examination
THERMODYNAMICS 2
SUBJECT CODE: 81908922
EXAMINER: C LOUW
Student No:__________________
Surname:____________________
333
5 4 3 2 1
Point Ou Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of Points Out of
s t 1.5 2 1 2 0.5 1, 2, 3 0 1, 2, 3
of 2.5 3 1.5 3, 4, 5 etc etc
1 1 3.5 4 etc
2 2 4.5 5 2 4, 5, 6
3 3 5.5 6 etc
4 4 6.5 7 2.5 4, 5, 6
5 5 7.5 8 etc
6 6 8.5 9 3 5, 6, 7
7 7 9.5 10 etc
8 8 10.5 11 3.5 5, 6, 7
9 9 etc etc etc
10 10 4 6, 7, 8
11 11 etc
etc etc 4.5 6, 7, 8
etc
5 7, 8, 9
etc
5.5 7, 8, 9
etc
6 8, 9, 10
etc
6.5 8, 9, 10
etc etc
334
7 7 9.5 10 etc
8 8 10.5 11 3.5 5, 6, 7
9 9 etc etc etc
10 10 4 6, 7, 8
11 11 etc
etc etc 4.5 6, 7, 8
etc
5 7, 8, 9
etc
5.5 7, 8, 9
etc
6 8, 9, 10
etc
6.5 8, 9, 10
etc etc
SCORE:
335
the
solution.
SCORE:
336
Appendix 12 – Louw’s Guided Enquiry Based Learning Guide for assisting
students’ learning
THERMODYNAMICS 2
C LOUW
337
Contents
Background……………………………………………………………………….……………..5
Chapter 1………………………………………………………………………...................6
Introduction to Thermodynamics……………………………………………….…......6
Non-flow processes…………………………………………………………………………..8
Example 1………………………………………………………………………………………..8
More relevant questions on this section…………………………………………….10
Exercise 1………………………………………………………………………………………16
Tutorial………………………………………………………………………………………….17
Chapter 2 - Flow processes - Example 1…………………..……………………….23
More relevant questions on this section…………………………………………….25
Exercise 2………………………………………………………………………………………30
Tutorial……………………………………………………………………………………….…31
Chapter 3 – Steam - Example 1…………………………...……………………….…35
More relevant questions on this section……………………………………………40
Exercise 3……………………………………………………………………………………...43
Tutorial……………………………………………………………………………………….…46
Chapter 4 - Throttling of steam - Example 1…………………………………….52
More relevant questions on this section…………………………………………..54
Exercise 4……………………………………………………………………………………..59
Tutorial…………………………………………………………………………………………60
Chapter 5 - Boiler and steam plant - Example 1…………………………….…64
Boiler plant flow diagram……………………………………………………………...64a
More relevant questions on this section…………………………………………..67
Exercise 5.1.…………………………………………………………………………………72
Tutorial………………………………………………………………………………………..74
338
Rankine cycle - Example 2……………………………………………………………..80
More relevant questions on this section……………………………………….…83
Exercise 5.2………………………………………………………………………………...86
Tutorial……………………………………………………………………………………….88
Chapter 6 – Condensers - Example 1…………………………………………..…92
Surface condenser diagrams……………………………………………………....92a
More relevant questions on this section………………………………………...95
Exercise 6………………………………………………………………………….........100
Tutorial……………………………………………………………………………..........101
Chapter 7 – Combustion - Example 1…………………………………………..107
More relevant questions on this section……………………………………….111
Exercise 7……………………………………………………………………………......117
Tutorial…………………………………………………………………………….........118
Revision Exercise……………………………………………………………………….123
339
Nomenclature
A area (m2)
A/F air fuel ratio
c velocity (m/s)
Cp specific heat capacity at constant pressure (kJ/kgK)
Cv specific heat capacity at constant volume (kJ/kgK)
CV calorific value (kJ/kg, MJ/kg)
EE equivalent evaporation from and at 1000C (kg steam/kg fuel)
h enthalpy (kJ)
h specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
h1 specific enthalpy of steam leaving the boiler plant (kJ/kg)
h0 specific enthalpy of water entering the boiler plant (kJ/kg)
hsup superheated steam specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
hg saturated steam specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
hfg specific latent heat of vaporization (kJ/kg)
hf saturated liquid specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)
KE kinetic energy (kJ/kg)
M Molar mass (kg/kmol)
m mass (kg)
ma minimum mass of air (kg)
me excess air mass (kg)
mf mass of fuel (kg)
mS mass of steam or condensate (kg)
mT total mass of air (kg)
mW mass of water (kg)
nT number of tubes
P pressure (kPa, MPa, bar)
Pa partial pressure of the dry air (kPa)
340
Pc condenser pressure (kPa, mmHg)
Pv partial pressure of the vapour (kPa)
PE potential energy (kJ/kg)
POC products of combustion
Q heat flow (kJ)
Ro universal gas constant (kJ/kgK)
R gas constant (kJ/kgK)
rW work ratio
Ssc specific steam consumption (kg/kWhr)
T temperature (0C, K)
TF superheated temperature (0C, K)
Tk temperature of condensate (0C, K)
TS saturation temperature (0C, K)
tw temperature of cooling water (0C, K)
u internal energy (kJ)
u change in internal energy (kJ)
U overall heat transfer coefficient (kW/m2 0C)
V volume (m3)
Va volume of air (m3)
Vg specific volume of dry saturated vapour (m3/kg)
Vs specific volume (m3/kg)
WD work done (kJ)
WDT turbine specific work done (kJ/kg)
x dryness fraction
x0 dryness fraction of steam in separating calorimeter
x1 dryness fraction of steam in throttling calorimeter
efficiency (%)
R Rankine efficiency (%)
density (m3/kg)
341
Background
The purpose of this guide is to help engineering learners to solve problems using the
Enquiry Based Learning (EBL) approach. To be able to solve a problem, one needs to
understand the process or system’s operations in question completely. Questions must
be asked to guide the learner through an information gathering process relevant to the
process or system under discussion. Answers to these questions can be found only if
the learner is actively involved in the learning process i.e. if action is taken to find
answers to these questions and learn how the process or system functions. Reference
material listed at the end of the study guides, text books, websites, papers or journals
can be used to gather information. Each problem has a specific solution or in some
cases more than one. The questions asked must be structured such that with every
answer of a question asked, the solution is a step closer. This process might seem very
time consuming at first, but with more practice and more knowledge gained in a
particular field, the skill to ask goal-directed questions will be developed.
The type of examples used is aimed at first year second semester students (S2) and
based on the fact that these learners has completed their first semester in engineering
and has therefore been exposed to background, terms and expressions used. Only one
example per chapter is given with a guide as to how to go through the process of
asking questions in order for the learner to gain more information about the problem
and to understand it completely so that a solution can be developed. At the end of each
example more relevant questions pertaining to the section under study are given with
answers for further assistance. The content of this guide should be regarded as merely
a support document to learners to learn Thermodynamics 2.
Ask questions pertaining to the problem. On each question asked you must ‘ACT’, by
342
this I mean you must read, investigate and search to find an answer to the question.
This will guide you through the process of gathering information and learning. This will
enable you to learn more about the problem understand the problem and eventually
solve it. Questions with no action from the learner results in no knowledge gained. The
information in this guide will only be of help if the learner is actively involved in the
learning process. Ask until you understand the problem completely only then can you
effectively solve it. Initially this may take some time, until you have developed the skill
to read a question, define the problem and ask specific questions to guide you
effectively to the solution (depending on the complexity of the problem this may only
take a few seconds):
343
CHAPTER 1
Introduction to Thermodynamics
Terms and Definitions
1. Units
Heat - Joules = J = Nm
Pressure = Pascals or kilo-pascals or bar
1bar = 100kPa
1kPa = 1000 Pa
Def.: The specific heat capacity of an object is the amount of thermal energy required
to give a unit mass of the object a unit temperature rise.
Eg. C of water is 4,187kJ/kgK
It is the amount of thermal energy required to give a unit mass of the gas by one
degree, with the volume remaining constant.
344
2.2 Specific heat capacity at constant pressure (Cp) [kJ/kgK]:
It is the amount of thermal energy required to give a unit mass of the gas by one
degree, with the pressure remaining constant.
3. Gas laws
Boyle found by means of an experiment that the volume of a mass of gas is inversely
proportional to the pressure on it, if the temperature remains constant.
Charles found by means of an experiment that the volume of a mass of gas, at constant
pressure, changes by 1/273 of its volume at 00C for every degree change in
temperature.
345
Each gas has its own gas constant R value determined as follows:
R = Ro/M
This law basically states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can only be
changed from on form to another. For a non-flow process: heat gained or lost = work
done + change in internal energy of the gas
Q = WD +Δu
U is the symbol for the internal energy of an ideal gas and is mainly determent by the
temperature of the gas. Internal energy is also a point function and is independent of
the rout followed to get from one point to another. For this reason is the change in
internal energy always calculate with the next formula:
Δu = mCv(T2 – T1)
346
Non-flow processes
Example 1
Oxygen is heated up in a sealed container. The original pressure was 10kPa and the
final pressure is 100kPa. The container has an inside diameter of 0.3m and an internal
height of 0.5m. The temperature at the beginning of the process was 110 0C. Take the
molecular mass of oxygen as 32. Determine:
1.1 Questions to ask in order for me to understand the problem and to come up
with a solution:
347
P T2
P2 2
T1
P1 1
V 1 = V2 V
Q: what is the relationship between pressure, volume and temperature during this
process?
A: P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2 but V1 = V2
» P1/T1 = P2/T2
PV = mRT
Q: The mass of the oxygen must be calculated. Which formulas contain mass that
can be a posseble option?
A: PV = mRT
Δu = mCv(T2 – T1)
R = Ro/M
R = 8.314/32
= 0.2598kJ/kgK
348
m = 3.55 *10-3 kg → answer
Q: can the second equation be used?
A: no, because Δu, Cv and T2 are unknown.
1.2
Q: Determine the final temperature T2 of the gas. Which formulas contain T2 that
can give a posseble solution?
A: P2V2 = mRT2 it is a constant volume process therefore V1=V2 and hence
everything is known except T2 and it can be solved:
T2 = 3832.08 K → answer
P1/T1 = P2/T2 this is the most straight forward solution to the question,
because everything is known except T2:
10/383 = 100/T2
T2 = 3830 K → answer
Δu = mCv(T2 – T1) this equation also contains T2, but Cv and Δu are unknown. Cv
can be calculated but not Δu and therefore this will not be an option.
Q: What is the relationship between pressure, volume and temperature for each
process?
Q: What is and n?
349
from the relationship of the specific heat capacities of the gas:
= Cp/Cv
n ≠ Cp/Cv
PP during this process all state point values change, work is done
on or by the gas, heat flow to or away from the system and the
internal energy of the gas increase or decrease
Q: What are the relevant formulas for each of these processes i.e. how is heat
flow (Q), work done (WD), change in internal energy (Δu) and enthalpy (h)
350
calculated for each one? (The derivations of these formulas are left to the learner
to investigate)
A: CVP Q = WD + Δu WD = ∫PdV = 0
Δu = mCv(T2 – T1) h = PV + u
_______________________________________________________________
= mR(T2 – T1)
Δu = mCv(T2 – T1) h = PV + u
_______________________________________________________________
IP Q = WD + Δu WD = ∫PdV = PVln r
= mRTlnr
Δu = mCv(T2 – T1) h = PV + u
_______________________________________________________________
AP Q = WD + Δu WD = ∫PdV
(P1V1 – P2V2)
=------------------
γ-1
mR(T1 – T2)
=------------------
γ-1
Δu = mCv(T2 – T1) h = PV + u
_______________________________________________________________
PP Q = WD + Δu WD = ∫PdV
(P1V1 – P2V2)
=------------------
n-1
mR(T1 – T2)
= -----------------
n-1
351
Δu = mCv(T2 – T1) h = PV + u
Q: How is each one illustrated on a pressure volume diagram?
A: CVP P
1 B 1 – 2 cooling
A – B heating
2 A
V
CPP P
1 2 1 – 2 heating
B A A – B cooling
WD
V
IP P
B 1 1 – 2 expansion
A – B compression
2
WD A
V
AP P
2 A 1 – 2 compression
A – B expansion
B
WD 1
V
PP P
2 A 1 – 2 compression
A – B expansion
B
WD 1
V
352
Exercise 1
1.3 A piston device contains 0.1m3 of air at 400kPa and 500C. Heat is transferred
to the air in the amount of 40kJ as the air expands isothermally. Determine
the amount of boundary work done during this process. (40kJ)
1.5 A piston-cylinder device, with a set of stops on the top, initially contains 3kg
of air at 200kPa and 270C. Heat is now transferred to the air, and the piston
rises until it hits the stops, at which point the volume is twice the initial
volume. More heat is transferred until the pressure inside the cylinder also
doubles. Determine:
353
205.54kJ is needed. Calculate:
Tutorial
By answering the above questions, you will be able to identify the process.
You can now apply all the formulas pertaining to this process to find the
answer.
You can also draw the process on a pressure-volume diagram and indicate the
area which represents the work done.
354
2. Draw the p-v axis and the constant temperature curve.
3. Remember that the process must stay on the isothermal curve and
movement between the initial and final point is restricted to this line.
4. Now the type of isothermal process must be identified – in this case it is a
compression process.
5. During compression the volume decreases and the pressure increases.
6. To be able to reflect this on the isothermal curve, make a point ‘1’ at the
lower right hand side and then move up with the curve to a position higher
which will be point ‘2’.
7. Draw vertical dotted lines from these points to the volume axis.
8. The enclosed area under the graph represents the work done the gas during
the process.
355
Chapter 2
Flow processes
Example 1
Air flows through a compressor with an initial velocity of 10m/s and an exit velocity of
100 m/s. At inlet the air has a pressure of 100kPa and a specific volume
0.83m3/kg. The exit pressure is 200kPa and the specific volume 0.66m3/kg. During is
passage through the compressor, the internal energy is increased by 100kJ/kg.
Calculate the heat flow to or away from the compressor if it requires 25kW to compress
the air at a flow rate of 2kg/s.
Q: what are the relationships between the inlet and outlet conditions and how can
this be expressed in terms of an equation?
A: draw up an energy balance across the compressor. This is an equation which
states that all energy entering the compressor must be equal to all energy
leaving the unit. This is based on the first law of thermodynamics which states
that energy can not be created or destroyed but can only change from one form
to another. This equation is as follows:
356
= gh (kJ/kg)
P1*Vs1 + u1 = this is the total energy or heat value of the fluid and is
also referred to as its enthalpy (h)
Note: due to the small values for potential energy and its influence on
the final answer, it is sometimes omitted from the energy
equation. This is however individually evaluated
P2*Vs2 + u2 = this is the total energy or heat value of the fluid and is
also referred to as its enthalpy (h)
Note: In the energy equation either enthalpy (h) or the term P*Vs + u is
used
Q: there is no specific value given for the internal energy at inlet or outlet,
how are these two unknowns dealt with in a single equation?
A: in some cases specific values are not necessary, but merely a
relationship of what happens between inlet and outlet with regard to
that specific property. In this specific case the internal energy is
increased a 100 kJ/kg and this gives the following relationship:
u2 = u1 + 100
357
Q: how is kW converted into kJ/kg?
A: in this problem mass flow is also given in kg/s:
kW = kJ/s
kJ/kg = kJ/s * s/kg i.e. power in kW is simply divided by the given mass flow in
kg/s to convert it to kJ/kg
Q: What is the relationship between the mass flow rate at inlet and the mass
flow rate at outlet?
A: m1 = c1A1/Vs1 = m2 = c2A2/Vs2
A: The diameter (cross sectional area) of the inlet and outlet pipes
The velocity at inlet and outlet
The specific volume of the fluid at inlet and outlet
358
process?
Condensers: The purpose of these units is to remove heat from hot fluid
No work done
Turbines: The purpose of this device is to utilize the kinetic energy of the
fluid flowing through it to develop mechanical power on the
output shaft
359
3. PE1 + P1Vs1 + u1 + Q = KE2 + PE2 + P2Vs2 + u2 + WD
Q: When the fluid undergoing the flow process is not a perfect gas e.g. steam,
how are the properties at inlet and outlet calculated?
A: For steam the inlet pressure, volume and temperature will be used to
determine the condition from steam table or the Mollier chart. The approach
for outlet will be the same using outlet values.
360
Exercise 2
2.1 Air enters an adiabatic nozzle steadily at 300kPa, 2000C, and 30m/s and
leaves at 100kPa and 180m/s. The inlet area of the nozzle is 80cm2.
Determine:
2.2 Air enters a nozzle steadily at 300kPa, 770C, and 50m/s and leaves at
100kPa and 320m/s. The heat loss from the nozzle is estimated to be
3.2kJ/kg of air flowing. The inlet area of the nozzle is 100cm2. Determine:
2.3 Air at 600kPa and 4000C enters an adiabatic nozzle that has an inlet-to-exit
area ratio of 2:1 with a velocity of 120m/s and leaves with a velocity of
380m/s. Determine:
2.4 Air at 80kPa and 1270C enters an adiabatic diffuser steadily at a rate of
6000kg/hr and leaves at 100kPa. The velocity of the air stream is decreased
from 230m/s to 30m/s as it passes through the diffuser. Find:
2.5 Air at 80kPa and -80C enters an adiabatic diffuser steadily with velocity of
200m/s and leaves with a low velocity at a pressure of 95kPa. The exit area of
the diffuser is 5 times the inlet area. Determine:
2.6 Air at 80kPa, 270C, and 220m/s enters a diffuser at a rate of 2.5kg/s and
leaves at 420C. The exit area of the diffuser is 400cm2. The air is estimated to
lose heat at a rate of 18kJ/s during this process. Determine:
361
2.6.2 the exit pressure of the air. (91.1kPa)
2.7 Air flows steadily through an adiabatic turbine, entering at 1MPa, 500 0C, and
120m/s and leaving at 150kPa, 1500C, and 250m/s. The inlet area of the
turbine is 80cm2. Determine:
2.8 Air enters the compressor of a gas turbine plant at ambient conditions of
100kPa and 250C with a low velocity and exits at 1MPa and 3470C with a
velocity of 90m/s. The compressor is cooled at a rate of 1500kJ/min and the
power input to the compressor is 250kW.Determine the mass flow rate of air
through the compressor. (0.68kg/s)
2.9 Air is compressed from 100kPa and 220C to a pressure of 1MPa while being
cooled at a rate of 16kJ/kg by circulating water through the compressor
casing. The volume flow rate of the air at inlet conditions is 150m3/min and
the power input to the compressor is 500kW. Determine:
2.10 In a centrifugal compressor air flows steadily at a rate of 2.1kg/s and 81m/s
with a pressure of 90kPa and specific volume of 0.85m3/kg. The exit
conditions are: speed 200m/s, pressure 900kPa and specific volume of
0.13m3/kg. The internal energy of the air at exit is 90kJ/kg greater than that
of the air at inlet. Heat is lost during compression at a rate of 95kJ/s.
Calculate:
Tutorial
2.1 Air enters an adiabatic nozzle steadily at 300kPa, 2000C, and 30m/s and leaves
at 100kPa and 180m/s. The inlet area of the nozzle is 80cm2. Determine:
362
What is the fluid flowing through the nozzle?
What are the inlet and outlet conditions and what information is supplied at these
points?
What is the process through this nozzle?
By answering the above questions, you will be able to identify the process.
You can now apply all the formulas pertaining to this process to find the answer.
Find answers to these questions and use them as a guide to solve this
problem. You can add more questions if necessary. Apply the same
approach to the remaining questions in the exercise.
363
Chapter 3
Steam
Example 1
Water at 100kPa and 150C is heated up in a pressure cooker on a stove. The location at
which the exercise takes place is at sea level i.e. 100kPa.
1.1 What will be the condition of the steam when the pressure gauge reads
300kPa and 2000C?
1.2 How much heat has been given to the steam?
1.3 Plot the process on a temperature-entropy diagram.
1.1 Questions to be asked in order for one to understand the problem and be able
to answer the questions:
Q: why will the food cook faster when the pressure inside the vessel increases?
A: there is a direct relationship between pressure and temperature. The more the
pressure increases the higher the temperature at which the water will boil.
At 100kPa water boils at 990C, if the pressure of the container is increased to
200kPa, the water will only start boiling at 1200C. The temperature at a
specific pressure where the water will start boiling is referred to as the
saturation temperature and these are the values listed in the steam tables. This
higher temperature allows the food to be cooked faster than in the normal pot.
364
water and the steam represent different phases. Water represents the liquid
phase and steam, the vapour phase. At any pressure water temperature will
increase until it reaches the saturation temperature corresponding to that
pressure. At this point the water is said to be saturated liquid. If water at
atmospheric conditions is heated up it will reach saturation point at sea level
(100kPa) at approximately 99.60C. At this point bubbles are forming within
the water and any heat addition will start changing some of the water into
steam. Now there are two phases in one container and this is referred to as wet
steam. The relationship between the amount of liquid and the amount of
vapour will determine the condition (dryness fraction) of the steam.
For any specific pressure there is a temperature at which water will boil. If the
pressure is increased the boiling temperature also increases. At a specific
pressure water will reach saturation point when its temperature is raised to the
temperature corresponding to the saturation temperature listed in the tables. At
this point the enthalpy of the water will be that of saturated liquid (hf). Any
more heat supplied to the water will start transforming the water into steam. It
will be noted that during this transformation process the temperature of the
water remains constant. This is because the heat supplied to the water is used
to transform the water from water into steam which is a phase change. This
heat is then also called latent heat of vaporization (hfg). Once this phase
change process is completed, the steam is said to be saturated vapour (h g) and
any further addition of heat will increase the temperature of the steam. The
steam will now enter the superheated region and will be referred to as
superheated steam and the enthalpy denoted as hsup. Once the temperature of
the steam is higher than the saturation temperature listed in the steam tables,
then the superheated tables or the Mollier chart must be used to determine the
enthalpy, specific volume etc.
1.2 To be able to answer the second question the following questions need to asked:
365
Q: what was the initial heat value of the water/steam?
A: when the process started, the water was at 150C and 100kPa. The total heat
value is the enthalpy of the water and it is calculated from:
The final enthalpy of the superheated steam can be read of the superheated
steam tables or Mollier chart or calculated if the specific heat capacity for the
steam was available:
hsup = hg + Cp ( TF – TS);
TF = final temperature;
TS = saturation temperature;
Cp = specific heat capacity at constant pressure.
However Cp is not given, therefore the value for hsup is read from the table or
chart:
hsup = 2866kJ/kg
The heat supplied to the steam is therefore the difference between the original
and the final heat value of the steam:
= hsup - hf
= 2866 – 62.81
= 2803.19kJ/kg → answer
1.3 to be able to answer this question the following questions need to be asked:
366
T (temp) A Volume
liquid Pressure
hf hg
B
O
s (entropy)
The area under a curve on this diagram will represent the heat flow (Q) during
the process. If it is a constant pressure process the process will remain on one
pressure line from the start to the end of the process. In the case of the question
the process starts at a pressure of 100kPa and end at 200kPa. To be able to plot
the process on this diagram some information regarding the initial and end
conditions are required. Again a number of questions must be asked:
Q: What was the condition of the steam when the process started?
A: the steam was pure water at atmospheric pressure;
367
T
2
T2 = 2000C
100kPa
Tsat = 990C
T1 = 150C
1
368
temperature for these processes?
A: By using any two of the following properties pertaining to the specific point:
enthalpy, pressure, specific volume, temperature, dryness fraction and entropy.
Note that if the steam is at the saturation temperature, its dryness fraction can
be between 0 and 1 and therefore it must be determined exactly.
This information can then be used with the Mollier chart or the steam tables.
Q: How is heat flow, work done, change in internal energy and enthalpy during
these processes determined?
A: CVP Q = WD + Δu WD = 0
369
Q: How can these processes be illustrates on temperature-entropy and
pressure-volume diagrams?
A: CVP P T
1 B 1 – 2 cooling 1 B
A – B heating
2
2 A A Q
V s
_______________________________________________________________
CPP P T
2 A
1 2 1 – 2 heating 1
B A A – B cooling
B Q
WD
V s
_______________________________________________________________
IP P T P1
1 – 2 expansion P2
1 A – B compression 1 2
B B A
2 Q
WD A
V s
_______________________________________________________________
AP P T
2 A 1 – 2 compression
A – B expansion 2 A
B
WD 1 B
1 V s
_______________________________________________________________
PP P T
2 A 1 – 2 compression 2 A
A – B expansion
1 B
WD B Q
1 V s
370
Note: steam is not a perfect gas and therefore phase changes occur. It
is important to identify the initial and final condition of the steam when
using the above formulas to ensure that the correct phase is
represented when substituting values.
A: for the purpose of this course we will only give an introduction to entropy
(s). Entropy is a measure of the amount of disorder or the amount of energy
which is not available to do work or the amount of energy which can not be
converted into work. Entropy is also a point function and is not influenced by
the process followed to get to the point. This is also the property which
remains constant during an adiabatic process, i.e. an adiabatic process takes
place on a constant entropy line. From a engineering point of view the change
in entropy (s) is most of the time of more value than the actual entropy value
at a specific point.
s = Q/T
s = Q/T
371
Exercise 3
3.1 Determine the specific enthalpy of steam at 600kPa and 0.96 degrees of
dryness. (2671.6kJ/kg)
3.3 A closed container with a volume of 0.035m3 contains dry saturated steam at a
pressure of 750kPa. Determine:
3.4 Superheated vapour at 1MPa and 3000C is allowed to cool at constant volume
until the temperature drops to 1500C. At the final state, determine:
3.6 A quantity of steam at a pressure of 3MPa has a dryness fraction of 0.72. The
steam occupies a volume of 0.4m3. Heat is transferred into the steam while the
pressure remains constant until the steam is dry saturated. The steam is then
cooled at constant volume until the pressure becomes1.8MPa. Determine:
372
Determine:
3.7.1 the condition of the steam after expansion according to the law
PV1.2 = C; (0.921)
3.7.2 the heat transfer per kilogram of steam during the expansion; (-
91kJ/kg)
3.7.3 the condition of the steam after the constant volume cooling;
(0.481)
3.7.4 the heat transferred per kilogram of steam during the constant
volume cooling. (-921kJ/kg)
3.8 Determine the enthalpy, volume and density of 4.5kg of steam at a pressure
of 2MPa and with a temperature of 3000C. (13612kJ, 0.5625m3, 7.97kg/m3)
3.9 Determine the specific enthalpy and specific volume of steam at a pressure
of 18bar and with a temperature of 3200C. (3075.16kJ/kg, 0.149m3/kg)
3.10 1kg supply water at 00C is changed at 1.4MPa to wet steam with a dryness
fraction of 0.82. The wet steam is heated still further, at constant pressure,
to a final volume of 0.1568m3. Calculate:
3.10.1 the work done to form super heated steam from wet steam;
(58kJ/kg)
3.10.2 the heat supplied to form super heated steam from wet steam.
(455.7kJ/kg)
3.11 5220kJ of heat is required to form 2kg wet steam at 1.3MPa from supply
water at 290C. The wet steam is heated still further, at constant pressure,
until the final temperature is 2500C. Calculate:
3.11.1 the work done to form super heated steam from wet steam;
(38.74kJ/kg)
3.11.2 the heat supplied to form super heated steam from wet steam.
(204kJ/kg)
373
Tutorial
By answering the above questions, you will be able to identify the process.
You can now apply all the formulas pertaining to this process to find the
answers.
This process can also be plotted on a pressure-volume and temperature-
entropy diagram.
Find answers to these questions and use them as a guide to solve this
problem. You can add more questions if necessary. Apply the same
approach to the remaining questions in the exercise.
374
Chapter 4
Throttling of steam
Example 1
Steam is supplied by a boiler plant to drive a turbine which in turn drives a generator
that generates power for consumption. The absolute pressure in the main supply line
was 1.5MPa. The pressure after throttling was 120kPa and the temperature 110 0C. The
mass of the water accumulated was 0.48kg and that of the condensate 4.58kg. For the
quality of steam used, the specific heat capacity at constant pressure can be taken as
2.1kJ/kgK. A combined separating and throttling calorimeter was used during the test.
Calculate the quality of steam in the main supply line.
Questions to be asked in order for one to understand the problem and be able to
answer the question:
Q: how are the readings taken, used in calculating the quality of the steam?
A: throttling is a flow process. Steam enters the device at a certain point with
specific properties and leave at another with different properties. The definition
of throttling can be worded as follows:
375
Q
1 2
When there is flow in a rigid pipe (WD = 0), and there is a restriction to this
flow, but the velocity before and after the restriction is the same (c1 = c2) and
the heat flow during the flow is so small that it can be neglected (Q = 0), then
we have a throttling process. From the steady flow energy equation:
h1 = h2 for steam
In the throttling calorimeter the enthalpy of the steam before and after throttling
remains unchanged, however the condition of the steam changes. During the
throttling process the steam is more dried out, completely dried or superheated.
Form the above steady flow energy equation it is clear that only one unknown
can be present. During throttling the lowest value in terms of quality of the
steam that can be used to solve the equation is dry steam. If the steam is
throttled to the dry saturation line, its enthalpy value can be read of the steam
tables or Mollier chart. The equation will be as follows:
h 1 = h2
all these values can be found and the unknown is the dryness fraction ’x1’
If the steam was throttled into the superheated region, the equation will look as
follows:
h 1 = h2
In this case the final pressure (P2) and temperature (TF) can be used to
determine the enthalpy value of the superheated steam from the Mollier chart. If
Cp is given then the above formula must be used and hg2 and TS can be read of
the steam table at the corresponding pressure. Again the only unknown will be
the dryness fraction ‘x1’.
376
For the separating calorimeter the following relationship is used to determine the
dryness fraction of the wet steam passing through it:
x0 = ms/(ms + mw)
x = x1 * x0
x0 = ms/(ms + mw)
= 4.58/(4.58 + 0.48)
= 0.905
h1 = h2
x1 = 0.951
x = x1 * x0
x = 0.951*0.905
x = 0.86 → answer
A: A steam sample collected from the main supply enters the calorimeter. At the
end of the collection tube a perforated dish ensures a change in flow direction.
Here the heavier water droplets are separated from the lighter vapour droplets.
This separated water is collected in a container. The dried out steam flows
377
further in the tube. It enters a condenser where it is completely condensed and
collected in another container. (Read this while studying the sketch)
A: x0 = ms/(ms + mw)
A: A steam sample collected from the main supply enters the calorimeter. At the
throttling valve, small amounts of wet steam on the high pressure side, is
allowed through to the low pressure side. This allows the steam to vaporize
further. Depending on the pressure and temperature after throttling, the steam
can be just dry or superheated.
A: The definition of throttling states that enthalpy does not change during
throttling. Therefore:
h 1 = h2
In these equations everything is known except the dryness fraction x 1 which can
be determined. Note that if the specific heat capacity of the superheated steam
is not given, the value of the superheated enthalpy must be read off the Mollier
chart or steam tables. In this case the equation on the right can not be used.
A: The steam must be dry saturated at least after throttling. This will give one
equation with one unknown x1. If the steam is wet after throttling there will be
two unknowns which make it imposseble to solve:
h 1 = h2
h 1 = h2
378
hf1 + x1hfg1 = hg
A: This depends upon the information given in the particular question. If the
pressure values are absolute, then it can be read off the steam table directly. If
the pressure values are gauge pressure, with atmospheric pressure available,
then the absolute pressure value must be calculated:
Pabs = PG + Patm
To find the absolute pressure value after throttling, when atmospheric pressure
(barometer reading in mmHg) is given and the manometer reading in mmHg
(gauge pressure after throttling) is available:
379
Exercise 4
From these results, determine the dryness fraction of the steam. (0.933)
4.5 Wet steam was throttled in a throttle calorimeter and a manometer reading
of 97.5mmHg was obtained. If the barometer reading is 690mmHg,
determine the pressure in the calorimeter. (105kPa)
380
Barometer height = 750mmHg
Manometer height = 75mmHg
Thermometer reading 1150C
Specific heat capacity Cp for superheated steam = 2.1kJ/kgK
4.9 The following results were obtained during a dryness test using a separating
– throttling calorimeter:
Tutorial
By answering the above questions, you will be able to identify the process.
You can now apply all the formulas pertaining to this process to find the
answers.
The position of the steam after throttling can also be pinpointed on the Mollier
381
chart using the pressure and temperature values after throttling. The initial
position can then be traced from this point to the left, where the horizontal line
intersects the main pressure line.
Find answers to these questions and use them as a guide to solve this
problem. You can add more questions if necessary. Apply the same
approach to the remaining questions in the exercise.
382
Chapter 5
Boiler and steam plant
Example 1
The following data refers to a test done on a water tube steam boiler:
Calculate:
Questions to be asked in order for one to understand the problem and be able to
answer the question:
383
temperature is increased above the boiler pressure is the steam superheated.
The heat required to increase the water temperature is receive from the heat of
the combustion chamber. Different types of boilers are available for e.g. coal fire
boilers, electrode boilers, diesel/crude oil boilers. Once the steam has reached its
desired temperature, it leaves the boiler plant to be applied at the consumption
point.
1.1
h1 = the enthalpy of the steam leaving the plant at boiler pressure and final
temperature
mf = the mass flow rate of the fuel supplied to the combustion chamber in
kg/s or kg/min or kg/hr or kg /kg steam generated
CV = the calorific value of the fuel used in the combustion chamber. This is
the heat released per kg of fuel burnt.
η = [ms(h1 – h0)]/[mf*CV)]
η = [4800(2858 – 199.72)]/[9*60*32000]
= 73.84% → answer
384
Note: the mass of fuel and steam must be in the same units when substituted
into the equation.
EE = [ms(h1 – h0)]/[mf*2257)]
EE = [4800(2858 – 199.72)]/[9*60*2257]
1.3
385
process in a boiler plant is. Heat transfer takes place in each of the components
that the plant consists of until the steam leaves the plant at the correct
temperature. In each of the components a different amount of heat is absorbed
by the water/steam. This is determined by the design of the component. To
calculate this heat absorption, it is important to know what happens in the
component under discussion. In this case the water enters the evaporator at
temperature near boiling point. During its passage through the evaporator, the
water absorbs heat from the flue gas and is converted into steam (wet). The
amount of heat absorbed during the process can be determined by the inlet and
outlet temperature of the water/steam or the temperature drop of the flue gas
across the evaporator. The equation for this is:
= 426.56kJ/s → answer
A: Economiser:
386
Evaporator:
Super heater:
Air pre-heater:
% absorbed in economiser:
% absorbed in evaporator:
Qin = mf * CV
% absorbed in economiser:
% absorbed in evaporator:
387
% absorbed in super heater:
In economiser:
In evaporator:
In super heater:
In air pre-heater:
Q: Which different types of fuel or methods of converting water into steam can
be used?
In the combustion chamber heat is generated by burning the fuel and forming
388
flue gas (hot combustion gas). Water flows inside the tubes and is heated up by
the flue gas from the combustion chamber which heats up the tube walls on the
outside, until it is converted into steam. This process can take place in different
section of the tubes called the economiser, evaporator and super heater. These
boilers can operate at high pressures and can supply large amounts of steam
over 1000 000kg/hr.
In the combustion chamber heat is generated by burning the fuel and forming
flue gas (hot combustion gas). Water flows on the outside of the tubes and is
heated up by the flue gas from the combustion chamber which heats up the
tubes from the inside as it flows through it. These boilers are not suitable for
high pressure and are much smaller in capacity e.g. a size of 500kg/hr.
Q: Which safety devices are required on these plants to make them legal?
Q: which additional chemical is used in electric boilers and for what reason?
389
Q: How can this negative impact be reduced?
Q: What are the start-up procedures and shut-down procedures for such a plant?
390
Exercise 5.1
5.1.1.1 the amount of coal of calorific value 30MJ/kg used per hour;
(636kg/hr)
5.1.1.2 the equivalent evaporation from and at 1000C for the
combined unit; (11.3kg/hr)
5.1.1.3 the heating surface required in the super heater if the rate
of heat transmission may be taken as 450 000kJ/m2 of
heating surface per hour. (3.85m2)
391
Take: Cp of superheated steam = 2.093kJ/kgK
Determine:
5.1.7 A boiler uses supply water at 37.70C. Steam leaves the boiler 0.93 dry at a
pressure of 2MPa and passes through a super-heater at constant pressure
where its temperature is raised to 3100C. The steam output is 9.5kg/kg coal
burnt with a calorific value of 37.5MJ/kg. Calculate:
Tutorial
5.1.1.1 the amount of coal of calorific value 30MJ/kg used per hour;
(636kg/hr)
392
5.1.1.2 the equivalent evaporation from and at 1000C for the
combined unit; (11.3kg/hr)
5.1.1.3 the heating surface required in the super heater if the rate
of heat transmission may be taken as 450 000kJ/m2 of
heating surface per hour. (3.85m2)
By answering the above questions, you will be able to identify the process.
You can now apply all the formulas pertaining to this process to find the
answers.
393
Rankine Cycle
Example 2
A steam plant operates on a Rankine cycle between a pressure of 75kPa and 4000kPa.
The steam enters the turbine at a temperature of 4500C and expansion through the
turbine takes place isentropically. Determine:
Questions to be asked in order for one to understand the problem and be able to
answer the question:
394
turbine the higher the energy given of to the turbine. By dropping the condenser
pressure to a value below atmospheric pressure allows for this.
2.1
WDT = h1 – h2
= 3330 – 2470
= 860kJ/kg → answer
2.2
395
h1 – h2 positive work done through turbine
h4 – h3 negative work done by feed pump
h1 – h3 heat supplied to water in boiler plant
h4 – h3 heat supplied to water by feed pump
= 29.2% → answer
2.3
= 3600/(3330 -2470)
396
= 4.186kg/kWhr → answer
2.4
= 0.995 → answer
P1
T
2 – 3 heat removed in
condenser
4
P2 3– 4 feed pump work
done
4 – 1 heat supplied by
3 2 boiler
s 1 = s2 s
397
1
Turbine
Sup/h
Evap 2
Econ Cond
4 3
Feedpump
Q: How does the quality of the steam at entry to the turbine impact on the plant
performance?
A: The higher the enthalpy of the steam the more energy is available for driving
the turbine. Therefore super heated steam will drive a larger unit more
effectively than saturated or even wet steam.
Q: How can the quality of steam at exit from a multi-stage turbine impact on the
life span and performance of the unit?
A: If the steam is to wet at exit from the turbine it can cause corrosion in the
unit which will result in a reduction in the lifespan.
If the steam starts to condense inside the unit it will result in power lost due to
the fact that the heavier water molecules have different flow characteristics to
that of the lighter vapour molecules.
A: In large units (many stages) the steam is tapped off at a specific point and
return to the boiler plant to be re-heated again. This will ensure that steam
leaves the unit with the correct dryness fraction.
Q: If expansion through the turbine is not isentropic, how will this impact on
the power developed by this unit?
A: Isentropic expansion through the unit means that no heat flows and that the
process takes place on a constant entropy line. Point 2 will also be the lowest
point achieved, which makes the enthalpy difference between point 1 and 2 a
398
maximum. If the expansion is not isentropic, it means that heat flow exits and
that it is because of friction between the steam molecules internally and between
the steam molecules and the metal surfaces. This means that the enthalpy value
of the steam at exit (numbered as 2’) is closer to point 1 then that of the
isentropic value and therefore the energy available for driving the turbine is less.
On the temperature-entropy diagram line 1-2’ is slightly curved to the right and
not vertical like line 1-2. The area under this line indicates the heat flow because
of friction.
Q: What can cause the expansion through the turbine not to be isentropic?
Enthalpy h1 and h2 can be read off the Mollier chart and substituted into this
equation to determine h2’.
WDT = h1 – h2’
Q: Why can the steam from the turbine not be exhaust into the atmosphere?
Q: What will the influence be on the plant performance if the condenser is under-
cooling the condensate too much?
399
higher running costs.
400
Exercise 5.2
5.2.1 Steam is supplied dry saturated at 40bar to a turbine and the condenser
pressure is 0.035bar. If the plant operates on the Rankine cycle, calculate
per kilogram of steam:
5.2.1.1 the work output neglecting the feed pump work; (982.4kJ)
5.2.1.2 the work required for the feed pump; (4kJ)
5.2.1.3 the heat transfer to the condenser cooling water, and the
amount of cooling water required through the condenser if
the temperature rise of the water is assumed to be 5.5K;
(1706.6kJ, 74.1kJ)
5.2.1.4 the heat supplied; (2685kJ)
5.2.1.5 the Rankine efficiency; (36.6%)
5.2.1.6 the specific steam consumption. (3.66kg/kWhr)
5.2.4 A steam plant operating on the Rankine cycle has a supply to the turbine,
superheated with a temperature of 2500Cand a pressure of 900kPa. After
expansion in the turbine the steam has a dryness fraction of 0.9.
Determine:
5.2.5 Consider a 300MW steam power plant which operates on a simple ideal
Rankine cycle. Steam enters the turbine at 10MPa and 5000C and is cooled
in the condenser at a pressure of 10kPa. Determine:
401
5.2.5.1 the quality of steam at the turbine exit; (0.793)
5.2.5.2 the mass flow rate of the steam.(235.4kg/s)
Tutorial
5.2.1 Steam is supplied dry saturated at 40bar to a turbine and the condenser
pressure is 0.035bar. If the plant operates on the Rankine cycle, calculate
per kilogram of steam:
5.2.1.1 the work output neglecting the feed pump work; (982.4kJ)
5.2.1.2 the work required for the feed pump; (4kJ)
5.2.1.3 the heat transfer to the condenser cooling water, and the
amount of cooling water required through the condenser if
the temperature rise of the water is assumed to be 5.5K;
(1706.6kJ, 74.1kJ)
5.2.1.4 the heat supplied; (2685kJ)
5.2.1.5 the Rankine efficiency; (36.6%)
5.2.1.6 the specific steam consumption. (3.66kg/kWhr)
By answering the above questions, you will be able to identify the process.
You can now apply all the formulas pertaining to this process to find the answers.
Find answers to these questions and use them as a guide to solve this
problem. You can add more questions if necessary. Apply the same
approach to the remaining questions in the exercise.
402
Chapter 6
Condensers
Example 1
A steam turbine discharges 5000kg of steam per hour at 400C and with a dryness of
0.85. The estimated air leakage is 15 kg/hr. The temperature at the suction of the air
pump is 320C and the temperature of the condensate is 350C. The barometer reading is
760mm Hg. Calculate:
1.3 the quantity of cooling water required if the rise temperature of the cooling
water is limited to 100C.
Questions to be asked in order for one to understand the problem and be able to
answer the question:
403
Heat rejected by steam = heat absorbed by cooling water
404
Pc = (Bh – Vm)/7.5
Vm = 704.95mm Hg → answer
2.2
mv = Va/Vg where
Va = volume of the air at air pump suction in m3/hr at the partial pressure of
the air at this point
Vg = volume of the dry saturated vapour at air pump suction in m3/kg at the
partial pressure of the vapour at this point
Q: what is the partial pressure of the air and the vapour at a specific point?
A: according to Dalton-Gibbs law of partial pressures the total pressure of a space is
made up by the sum of the partial pressures of the individual gases in the space
at the same temperature. Look at the following example. A container is filled
with two gases, A and B. The total pressure (PT) in the cylinder will then be PT =
PA + PB, where PA and PB are the partial pressures of gases A and B individually
where both these gases are at the same temperature.
Pc = Pv + Pa where
Pc = condenser pressure
405
Pv = partial pressure of the vapour at the suction spout temperature
Pc = Pv + Pa
7.384 = 4.799 + Pa
Pa = 2.59kPa
PaVa = maRaTa
Va = 507.9 m3/hr
mv = 507.9/29.82
= 17.031kg/hr → answer
2.3
Q: what is the amount of cooling water required if the temperature rise of the
cooling water is kept to 100C?
A: from the explanation of the condenser operation the following relationship is
made between the heat rejected by the steam and the heat absorbed by the
cooling water:
mw = 248293.29kg/hr → answer
406
A: The main categories for condensers are: surface condensers and jet
condensers.
Q: How does the inside configuration of these categories differs from one
another?
A: Surface condensers:
In these units the hot and cold water circuits are not mixing which allows for the
re-use of treated condensate from the turbine. The one fluid will enter the shell
and flow over the tubes and the other will enter the tubes and flow through
them. This reduces the water treatment of the boiler plant.
Jet condensers:
The hot and cold fluid enters a common chamber and mixes. The mixture is then
re-circulated to the plant for use.
Q: Heat flows from the hot fluid to the tube and from the tube to the cold fluid,
what are the formulas to determine this relationship of heat transfer?
A: Heat rejected by steam = heat flow through tube walls = heat absorbed by
cooling water
407
Q: What is the overall heat transfer coefficient ‘U’ for a unit?
Tcold in
Thot in Thot in
Tcold in
408
Thot in Thot in
T1
Tcold out
Thot out
T1 Tcold out T2 Thot out
T2
Tcold in
T cold in
A: If there are more than one tube pass a correction factor must be brought in
because the above calculation is for pure parallel or pure counter flow units. This
will be done at a later stage and is not included in this syllabus.
Q: Why will a wet air pump be replaced with a dry air pump?
A: The dry air pump suction temperature is lower than that of the wet air pump
which means that less vapour will be pumped out. This means a reduction in
make-up water as well as water treatment costs. The size of the dry air pump is
also smaller than that of the wet air pump, which also means a saving in
electricity due to the smaller electrical drive motor.
409
Exercise 6
6.1 A surface condenser is fitted with separate air and condensate outlets. A
portion of the cooling surface is screened from the incoming steam and the
air is passes over these screened tubes to the air extraction and becomes
cooled below the condensate temperature. The condenser receives 20
000kg/hr of dry saturated steam at 36.20C. At the condensate outlet the
temperature is 34.60C and at the air extraction the temperature is 290C. The
volume of air and vapour leaving the condenser is 3.8m3/min. Assume
constant pressure throughout the condenser, calculate:
6.2 A condenser condenses 2700kg steam per hour while air leaks into it at
2.2kg/hr. The condensate and air suction spout temperatures are 32.90C.
The barometer and vacuum gauge readings are 765mmHg and 690mmHg
respectively. The condenser uses 125.55Mg of cooling water per hour to
condense steam with a dryness fraction of 0.86 and the air pump has a
volumetric efficiency of 82.5%. Take R = 0.287kJ/kgK for air and calculate:
6.2.1 the temperature rise of the cooling water; (10.850C)
6.2.2 the air pump capacity in m3/min. (0.78m3/min)
6.3 5595kg of steam with a dryness fraction of 0.85 is condensed per hour by a
surface condenser while air leaks into it at a rate of 0.87kg/1000kg of steam
condensed. The barometer reading is 745.5mmHg and the vacuum gauge
reading 674.25mmHg. The temperature of the air suction spout of the air
pump and condensate are each 37.70C and R for air is 0.287kJ/kgK. The
cooling water enters and leaves the condenser at 17.50C and 40.50C
respectively. Calculate:
6.4 A condenser works under a vacuum of 700mmHg while air leaks into it at a
4.25kg/hr. The air pump extraction spout has a temperature of 32.90C and
the barometer reading is 760mmHg. Take r for air 0.287kJ/kgK and
calculate:
410
6.4.1 the volume of air removed per hour; (124.37m3/hr)
6.4.2 the mass of vapour present in the air per hour. (4.41kg/hr)
6.5 A condenser condenses wet steam which enters it at 49.50C and leaves it at
37.70C, while the cooling water absorbs 1838MJ heat per kilogram steam.
Take R for air 0.287kJ/kgK and calculate:
6.6 The temperature of the cooling water in a condenser rises from 15.30C to
25.80C while condensing 12 500kg steam per hour, 0.94 dry and at a
pressure of 4.5kPa absolute. The temperature of the condensate is 290C and
the heat transfer coefficient 4kW/m2 0C. The condenser has two passes and
contains tubes with outside diameter 20mm and wall thickness 1.5mm with
cooling water at 0.8m/s through it. Calculate the number and the length of
the tubes. (1992, 2m)
6.7 18 000kg of steam is condensed per hour by a condenser while air leaks into
it at 0.35kg per 1000kg of steam. The steam enters the condenser dry
saturated at 37.70C and the condensate leaves it at 34.60C. The loss of
condensate is made up by addition of water at 60C. An air pump, fitted with
an air cooler extracts the air from the condenser at 24.10C. Calculate:
Tutorial
6.1 A surface condenser is fitted with separate air and condensate outlets. A
portion of the cooling surface is screened from the incoming steam and the
air is passes over these screened tubes to the air extraction and becomes
cooled below the condensate temperature. The condenser receives 20
000kg/hr of dry saturated steam at 36.20C. At the condensate outlet the
temperature is 34.60C and at the air extraction the temperature is 290C. The
volume of air and vapour leaving the condenser is 3.8m3/min. Assume
constant pressure throughout the condenser, calculate:
411
Questions relevant to understand and solve this problem:
By answering the above questions, you will be able to identify the process.
Make a neat sketch of the unit and fill in all the information supplied and the
correct positions. This will ensure that the correct values are used during
calculations.
You can now apply all the formulas pertaining to this process to find the
answers.
Find answers to these questions and use them as a guide to solve this
problem. You can add more questions if necessary. Apply the same
approach to the remaining questions in the exercise.
412
Chapter 7
Combustion
Example 1
A fuel contains 4% hydrogen, 89% carbon, 1% sulphur, 2.5% oxygen and 3.5% ash.
The fuel is supplied with 20% excess air. Calculate:
Questions to be asked in order for one to understand the problem and be able to
answer the question:
ma:1
If more air is supplied than the required amount, then the extra air supplied is
called the excess air (me). To be able to determine the air-fuel ratio the total
amount of air (mT) in the combustion chamber must be determined. The total
mass of air is made up of the exact amount and the excess air supplied:
mT = ma + me
The air-fuel ratio is now termed the actual air-fuel ratio and expressed as
follows:
mT:1
413
such as carbon, hydrogen and sulphur. The sulphur content in the fuel is
normally kept to a minimum because of its corrosive nature which can damage
the engine components. Gaseous fuels will have active element such as
methane, hydrogen and carbon-dioxide. The fuel sample in the question is either
a solid or liquid fuel looking at the elements that it consists of. In this fuel
sample the active elements are hydrogen, carbon and sulphur. To determine the
oxygen required for complete combustion of each element a chemical reaction
equation and the molecular mass of the element is required:
H2 + O2 » H2O
Balance the equation and determine the amount of oxygen per kilogram of
hydrogen required. Molar mass of hydrogen (H) is 1 and that of oxygen (O) is
16.
2H2 + O2 » 2H2O
1+8»9
This means that 1kg of hydrogen requires 8kg of oxygen to burn out completely
and form water.
Repeat this process for carbon and sulphur. Molar mass of carbon (C) is 12 and
that of sulphur (S) is 32.
For carbon:
C + O2 » CO2
C + O2 » CO2
12 + 32 » (12 + 32)
12 + 32 » 44
1 + 32/12 » 44/12
This means that 1kg of carbon requires 32/12 kg of oxygen to burn out
completely and form carbon-dioxide.
414
For sulphur:
S + O2 » SO2
32 + 32 » (32 + 32)
32 + 32 » (64)
1+1»2
This means that 1kg of sulphur requires 1kg of oxygen to burn out completely
and form sulphur-dioxide.
To determine the total amount of oxygen required, add up the amount of oxygen
for each element:
ma = mO2/23.3*100
= 2.678/23/3*100
415
20% excess air is supplied in this question and therefore the mass of this excess
air must be calculated. The following relationship is used:
me = ma*%excess air/100
= 11.949*20/100
The total amount of air supplied to the combustion chamber is now calculated:
mT = ma + me
= 11.949 + 2.299
mT:1
13.793:1 → answer
1.2
416
Elements Mass /kg percentage %
fuel
O2 me * %O2 in air/100
SO2 %S * %/100
→ answer
417
Elements Mass /kg f M Volume %
→ answer
A: In this case the total mass or volume of N2 in the POC will be determined from
ma or Va. There will also be no O2 in the POC present, because me is zero.
Q: How does too much air influence the performance of an internal combustion
engine?
A: If there is too much air supplied the mixture is called lean (weak) and the
engine will have poor performance in term of power developed.
Q: How does too much fuel influence the performance of an internal combustion
engine?
418
A: If there is too much fuel supplied, the mixture is called rich and the engine will
not be able to burn all the fuel, because there is not enough air supplied for the
amount of fuel. This will result in the engine having a high fuel consumption.
A: Let the two fuels be liquids with a composition: Benzene (C6H6) and octane
(C8H18) and the specific ratio for the purpose of explaining C6H6 : C8H18 = 3:4
This means that 1kg of benzene requires 3.08kg of oxygen to burn out
completely and form water and carbon-dioxide.
The amount of benzene present in the sample is not 1kg but 3 parts out of a
total of 7 parts. The amount of O2 required is then:
114 + 400 » 352 + 162 divide by 114 to express per kilogram of fuel:
This means that 1kg of octane requires 3.51kg of oxygen to burn out completely
and form water and carbon-dioxide.
419
The amount of octane present in the sample is not 1kg but 4 parts out of a total
of 7 parts. The amount of O2 required is then:
= 3.33kg
mT = ma
O2 me * %O2 in air/100
0 * 23.3/100 0 0 0
SO2
0 0 0 0
420
1.11 1.11/15.28*100 7.26
Q: If the fuel is a gas, how does it influence the balancing of the chemical
reaction?
A: Let the two fuels be: Ethane (C2H6) and Propane (C3H8)
This means that 1m3 of ethane requires 3.5m3 of oxygen to burn out completely
and form water and carbon-dioxide.
This means that 1m3 of propane requires 10m3 of oxygen to burn out completely
and form water and carbon-dioxide.
A: For gaseous fuel the volume of O2 will be determined. Let assume that the
sample consists of the following ratio for this explanation: C2H6 : C3H8 = 2:3
The amount of ethane present in the sample is not 1m3 but 2 parts out of a total
of 5 parts. The volume of O2 required is then:
The amount of octane present in the sample is not 1m3 but 3 parts out of a total
of 5 parts. The volume of O2 required is then:
421
10 * 3/5 = 6m3
= 7.4m3
Va = VO2/21*100
= 7.4/21*100
= 35.24m3
V T = Va + Ve = V a
O2 Ve * %O2 in air/100
0 * 21/100 0 0 0
422
Exercise 7
7.1 A sample of coal gave the following analysis by mass: C 81.9%; H 2 4.9%; O2
6%; N2 2.3%; ash 4.9%. Calculate:
7.2 Calculate the air/fuel ratio for benzene (C6H6), and the wet and dry analysis
of the products of combustion. (13.2/1, CO2 16%, H2O 8.05%, N2 75.8%,
CO2 17.5%, N2 82.5%)
7.3 The coal supplied to a boiler has the following composition by mass:
hydrogen 4%, carbon 84%, moisture 5%, the remainder ash. The air
supplied is 40% in excess of that required for complete combustion and coal
is burned at the rate of 2000kg/hr. Assuming that the specific volume of the
flue gases at entrance to the flue stack is 1.235m3/kg and that the maximum
permisseble flue gas velocity is 7.75m/s, find the area of the cross-section of
the stack at entrance. Assume that air contains 23% oxygen by mass.
(1.47m2)
7.4 A furnace gas has the following volumetric analysis: H2 15%, CO 24%, CO2
6%, CH4 12%, O2 3% and N2 40%. Calculate the volumetric analysis of the
dry products of combustion with 30% excess air. (N2 81.46%, O2 4.17%,
CO2 14.37%)
7.5 The volumetric analysis of a furnace gas is: CO 17.8%, H2 51.3%, CH4
22.5%, O2 0.8%, CO2 5.2% and N2 2.4%. Calculate the air/fuel ratio with
20% excess air. (4.5m3/m3f)
7.6 A fuel with a formula of C7H16 is burned with air. Calculate the minimum
mass and volume of air required for complete combustion of 1kg and 1m3
fuel respectively. (15.1kg, 52.38m3)
7.7 A fuel with a formula of C4H10 is burned with air. Calculate the minimum
mass and volume of air required for complete combustion of 1kg and 1m3
fuel respectively. (21.3kg, 42.86m3)
7.8 Coal with a mass analysis of C 85%, H2 10%, O2 2%, S 1% and 2% ash is
used in a boiler. If 25% excess air is supplied calculate:
423
7.8.1 the stoichiometric air/fuel ratio; (13.12/1)
7.8.2 the percentage composition according to mass of the products
of combustion; (N2 72.38%, O2 4.4%, CO2 17.93%, SO2
0.12%, H2O 5.18%)
7.8.3 the volume of the exhaust gas at S.T.P. with R = 0.28kJ/kgK;
(13.12m3/kgf)
7.8.4 the heat rejected to the atmosphere by the dry exhaust gas in the
form of a vapour with the pressure 120kPa and temperature
186.80C at the chimney. Take Cpex = 1.23kJ/kgK (1662kJ/kgf)
7.9 A fuel contains according to mass carbon 82%, hydrogen 11%, sulphur
1.5%, oxygen 3.5% and the remainder ash. Calculate the higher and lower
calorific values of the fuel if the partial pressure of the steam in the exhaust
gas is 6kPa. (42.8MJ/kg, 40.4MJ/kg)
7.10 The volumetric analysis of a gas is: CO 24.5%, CO2 4.5%, H2 5.5%, CH4
34.5%, O2 2.2% and N2 28.8%. Calculate the higher and lower calorific
values of the fuel per m3, if every m3 vapour that formed absorbs 2.4 MJ of
heat. (16.62MJ/m3, 16.49MJ/m3)
Tutorial
7.1 A sample of coal gave the following analysis by mass: C 81.9%; H 2 4.9%; O2
6%; N2 2.3%; ash 4.9%. Calculate:
What information is given and how can this be used to determine the type of
fuel?
What is a stoichiometric air/fuel ratio and what is an actual air/fuel ratio? What
is a volumetric analysis of POC?
What is the difference between a dry and wet analysis?
By answering the above questions, you will be able to identify the type of fuel.
You can now apply all the formulas pertaining to this process to find the
answers.
When doing a mass or volumetric analysis of POC, a table format is
suggested.
424
Find answers to these questions and use them as a guide to solve this
problem. You can add more questions if necessary. Apply the same
approach to the remaining questions in the exercise.
425
Revision exercise
Apply your enquiry based learning skills which you have been
developing throughout the course to solve the following problems. At
this point you should also be able to formulate questions and answers
based on your knowledge gained in this course. This will also be an
exercise to indicate to you the effectiveness of your learning process in
terms of knowledge retention, understanding and application in solving
problems. Briefly list all your questions with answers below each
question before solving the problem:
1.1.2 the work done during compression per kilogram of air; (4)
During the second stage of the process is reversed and the air is expanded
polytropically to double the initial volume.
Calculate:
426
2. The pressure of a certain gas in the cylinder of an engine rises from
75kPa to 1.15MPa during the compression stroke. During this stroke
the volume decreases from 0.5m3 to 0.06m3 and the compression
takes place according to the law PVn = constant. The initial
temperature of the gas is 390C. Assume R = 0.285kJ/kgK for the gas
and Cv = 0.715kJ/kgK. Calculate:
2.2.2 Calculate the volume and temperature at the end of heat addition. (6)
[28]
427
3. In a steady flow system, 1kg of fluid per second enters the control
volume at a pressure of 1 bar and it leaves the system at a pressure of
10bar. The inlet and exit velocities are 40m/s and 20m/s respectively.
During the process 36000kJ of heat is transferred per hour to the
control volume. The rise in enthalpy of the fluid is 15kJ/kg. Calculate
the power developed by the system. [4]
428
4. A steam turbine receives a steam flow of 25 000 kg/hr and its power
output is 500 kW. Neglecting any heat loss from the turbine, find the
change in specific enthalpy of the steam flowing through the turbine
taking inlet and outlet velocity as 80 m/s and 300 m/s. (3)
429
5. Determine how much energy is required to change 3.5kg of
water at 150C into superheated steam in a rigid vessel. The
degree of superheat is 300C at a pressure of 500kPa. [5]
430
6. Steam at a pressure of 400kPa and with a dryness fraction of 0.85
expands according to the law PV1.2 = C to a volume of 0.7m3/kg. Determine:
431
7. A combined separating and throttling calorimeter was used to
determine the dryness fraction of the steam in the main steam pipe in which
the pressure was 860kPa. The observations were:
Determine:
7.1 the dryness fraction of the steam in the main steam pipe. (8)
7.2 Draw the throttling process on a Mollier chart with all relevant detail. (3)
[11]
432
8. A boiler fitted with a super-heater generates 1800kg of steam per
hour at a pressure of 11bar and temperature of 2500C, from feed
water at 900C. The dryness fraction of the steam as it enters the super-heater
is 0,98. The has a calorific value of 26 000kJ/kg, and is
consumed at a rate of 467kg/hr. Calculate:
8.2 the percentage of the fuel heat supplied in the combustion chamber,
absorbed by the steam in the super-heater tubes; (5)
8.3 the equivalent evaporation from and at 1000C. Briefly discuss the
meaning of this value. (3)
[12]
433
9. A steam plant consists of an economiser, boiler, super-heater and air
pre-heater. The coal used has a calorific value of 3600kJ/kg and the
ratio of air to fuel by mass is 18:1. Air enters the air pre-heater at 160C
and leaves at 200C. Feed water enters the economiser at 460C and
leaves at 1800C. Steam enters the super-heater 0.97 dry and leaves at 2600C.
The pressure in the boiler is 2MPa. Steam is generated at the
rate of 2300kg/hr. The specific heat capacity for air is 1.005kJ/kgK
and that for the flue gas is 1.045kJ/kgK. The fuel consumption is
2000kg/hr.
9.1 Make a neat line sketch of the plant indicating the flow of air, steam
and flue gases. (5)
9.2 Calculate the heat transfer per kilogram of fuel used, in the
economiser, boiler, super-heater and air pre-heater. (9)
9.4 Calculate the equivalent evaporation from and at 1000C per kilogram
fuel burnt. (2)
9.5 Calculate the temperature of the flue gases leaving the combustion
chamber. (2)
[20]
434
10 Consider a steam power plant that operates on a simple ideal
Rankine cycle and has a net power output of 20MW. Steam
enters the turbine at 7MPa and 5000C and is cooled in the
condenser at a pressure of 10kPa by running cooling water
from a lake through the tubes of the condenser at a rate of 1750kg/s.
Determine:
435
11. A condenser receives wet steam at a pressure of 7kPa. The air leakage
is 20kg/hr and take R = 0.287kJ/kgK. Mass of cooling water is 1140kg/min
and mass of the condensate is 2360kg/hr at a temperature
of 36.20C. The barometer reading is 641mmHg and the rise in the
cooling water temperature is 18.10C.
Calculate:
11.1.2 a dry air pump is used with a suction tube temperature of 32.90C; (4)
11.4 the number of tubes for this two pass surface condenser, if the internal
diameter of the pipes is 13 mm and the water speed is 3 m/s. (3)
[16]
436
12. The air leakage into a surface condenser operating with a steam turbine
is estimated as 84kg/hr. The vacuum near the inlet of the air pump is
700mmHg when the barometer reads 760mmHg. The temperature at
the inlet of the air pump is 200C. Calculate:
12.2 the dimensions of the reciprocating air pump to remove the air if it
runs at 200rpm. Take diameter: stroke = 3:2 and the
volumetric efficiency as 100 %; (4)
437
13. During a test, the following analysis by mass were obtained from a
given sample:
Air contains 23% oxygen by mass and the atomic masses are:
Calculate:
13.4 the calorific value of this fuel per kilogram of fuel; (4)
13.5 the dry products of combustion, considering the 30% excess air. (8)
[22]
438
14. An experiment was performed with a fuel mixture consisting of the following:
Air contains 23% oxygen by mass and the atomic masses are:
439
Appendix 13 – Student responses to interviews
Item 1a: The group sessions motivated you to come prepared to class.
Item 1b: The group sessions helped developing your communication skills.
440
Item 2: The enquiry based sessions helped me to analyse problems effectively.
Item 3: When working alone the enquiry based approach helped me to analyse problems
effectively.
Item 4: This method helped me to understand the work and not to just memorise it.
441
We share information and analyse the This method did not help me to understand
problem so we understood what to do/group the work and I still have to memorise it
discussions helped us to understand the 0 (N = 20)
work/we were able to use questions to
analyse new problems
20 (N = 20)
Item 5: This method helped me develop the ability to solve problems on my own.
Item 6: The Thermodynamics booklet with questions and answer helped me to understand
the work better.
442
Item 7: The Thermodynamics booklet’s additional questions and answers helped me to
understand and analyse new problems better.
Item 9: Any positive or negative comments on your overall experience compared to the
traditional teaching method.
443
how to tackle questions I learned to do
things
20 (N = 20)
Item 10: Did this method give you positive attitude towards the course?
444
Appendix 14 – Electronic Thesis & Dissertations (ETD) and Plagiarism
Requirements
THE STUDENT AND SUPERVISOR CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION OF ELECTRONIC RESEARCH OUTPUT ON INTERNET
AND WSU INTRANET
FACULTY: EDUCATION
TITLE OF THE RESEARCH OUTPUT: ‘THE EFFECT OF A GUIDED ENQUIRY BASED LEARNING APPROACH ON
CONSENT: I HEREBY GIVE MY CONSENT TO WALTER SUSULU UNIVERSITY TO PUBLISH MY RESEARCH OUTPUT FOR
THE QUALIFICATION ABOVE ON THE WSU INTRANET AND INTERNET. I CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE, THERE IS NO PLAGIARISM IN THE RESEARCH OUTPUT AS SUBMITTED. I HAVE TAKEN REASONABLE
CARE TO ENSURE THAT THE RESEARCH OUTPUT MEETS THE QUALITY LEVEL EXPECTED FOR THE PRESENT
QUALIFICATION LEVEL BOTH IN TERMS OF CONTENT AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS. I FULLY UNDERSTAND THE
CONTENTS OF THIS DECLARATION.
___________________________________ _______________________________
SIGNATURE OF STUDENT DATE
ENDORSEMENTS BY:
SUPERVISOR:
DATE: _______________
445
CO-SUPERVISOR(S):
DATE: _______________
DATE: _______________
446