Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Encyclopedia of Snow, Ice and Glaciers: Ecommons
Encyclopedia of Snow, Ice and Glaciers: Ecommons
University of Dayton
eCommons
Geology Faculty Publications Department of Geology
2011
Pratap Singh
Umesh K. Haritashya
University of Dayton, uharitashya1@udayton.edu
eCommons Citation
Singh, Vijay P.; Singh, Pratap; and Haritashya, Umesh K., "Encyclopedia of Snow, Ice and Glaciers" (2011). Geology Faculty
Publications. Paper 7.
http://ecommons.udayton.edu/geo_fac_pub/7
This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Geology at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geology
Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact frice1@udayton.edu,
mschlangen1@udayton.edu.
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF EARTH SCIENCES SERIES
ENCYCLOPEDIA of
SNOW, ICE AND
GLACIERS
edited by
VIJAY P. SINGH
Texas A&M University
College Station, Texas
USA
PRATAP SINGH
New Delhi
India
UMESH K. HARITASHYA
University of Dayton
Dayton, Ohio
USA
Contents
Aerial Photogrammetry for Glacial Monitoring 4 Appalachian Glacier Complex in Maritime Canada 54
Martin Kappas Rudolph R. Stea
Atmospheric Circulation and Glaciochemical Catastrophic Rock Slope Failures and Mountain
Records 75 Glaciers 113
Shichang Kang Kenneth Hewitt, John J. Clague and Philip Deline
Dating Glacial Landforms 175 Dry and Wet Snow Line/Zone 240
Jason P. Briner Ravi P. Gupta
Estimation of Glacier Volume and Volume Frozen Toe (Outer Zone of Glacier Snout) 311
Change by Scaling Methods 278 Pratima Pandey
David B. Bahr
Gelisols 313
Estuary Ice Cover 281 Divya Dudeja
Brian Morse
Geochemistry of Snow and Ice 313
Tandong Yao, Yongqin Liu, Huabiao Zhao and
Fast Ice 289 Wusheng Yu
D. P. Dobhal
Geocryology 324
Finger Rafting 289 Amit Kumar
Dominic Vella and John Wettlaufer
GIS in Glaciology 325
Firn 290 Jacob Napieralski
Rachel W. Obbard, Ian Baker and
Rachel W. Lomonaco Glacial Drainage Characteristics 328
Richard A. Marston
Fjords 293
Umesh K. Haritashya, Vijay P. Singh and Glacial Ecosystems 330
Pratap Singh Nozomu Takeuchi
Himalaya 510 Ice Age Cycles: Data, Models, and Uncertainties 565
John F. Shroder Donald Rapp
Himalayan Glaciers in 2010 and 2035 520 Ice Age Development Theory 576
J. Graham Cogley Matthias Kuhle
Last Glacial Maximum Glaciation (LGM/LGP) Mediterranean Glaciers and Glaciation 726
in High Asia (Tibet and Surrounding Mountains) 697 Philip D. Hughes
Matthias Kuhle
Melt Runoff Modeling 730
Latent Heat of Condensation 702 Pratap Singh
Prem Datt
Melting Processes 733
Latent Heat of Fusion/Freezing 703 Luke Copland
Prem Datt
Meltwater Channels 735
Cliff Atkins
Latent Heat of Sublimation 703
Prem Datt
Meltwater Conduit 738
D. P. Dobhal
Latent Heat of Vaporization/Condensation 703
Prem Datt Meltwater Erosion 738
Rajesh Kumar
Lateroglacial 704
Lasafam Iturrizaga Meltwater Pressure 739
Rajesh Kumar
Lateroglacial Landform Systems 704
Lasafam Iturrizaga Meltwater Storage 739
Pratap Singh
Laurentide Ice Sheet 708
John T. Andrews Microorganisms Associated with Glaciers 741
Vanya I. Miteva
Layering of Snow 713
Rajesh Kumar Monitoring and Warning Systems 744
Markus Konz
LIDAR in Glaciology 713
Michael N. Demuth Monsoonal Records Observed from
Snow/Ice/Glacier 746
Little Ice Age 722 Shichang Kang
Rajesh Kumar
Moraine 747
Lobe 722 Anders Schomacker
Rajesh Kumar
Moulins 756
Mapping of Internal Glacial Layers 723 Umesh K. Haritashya, Vijay P. Singh and
David A. Braaten Pratap Singh
CONTENTS xv
Cliff Atkins
Vladimir Aizen
School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences
College of Science, Mines Building
Victoria University of Wellington
University of Idaho
P.O. Box 600
Moscow, ID 83844-3025
Wellington 6140
USA
New Zealand
aizen@uidaho.edu
Cliff.Atkins@vuw.ac.nz
Ian Baker
John T. Andrews
Thayer School of Engineering
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
Dartmouth College
and Department of Geological Sciences
Hanover, NH 03755
University of Colorado
USA
Boulder, CO 80309
Ian.Baker@Dartmouth.edu
USA
andrewsj@colorado.edu
Jostein Bakke
Department of Geography/Bjerknes Centre for Climate
Manoj K. Arora Research
Department of Civil Engineering University of Bergen
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Fosswinckelsgate 6
Roorkee 247667 5020 Bergen
India Norway
manojfce@iitr.ernet.in Jostein.Bakke@geog.uib.no
xxii CONTRIBUTORS
David R. Butler
Claudio Bravo Mountain GeoDynamics Research Group
Centro de Estudios Científicos, CECS Department of Geography
Arturo Prat 514 Texas State University-San Marcos
Valdivia San Marcos, TX 78666-4616
Chile USA
cbravo@cecs.cl db25@txstate.edu
Katie Burles
Department of Geography Stanley A. Changnon
University of Lethbridge University of Illinois
4401 University Dr Urbana, IL 61853
Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4 USA
Canada schangno@illinois.edu
xxiv CONTRIBUTORS
Poul Christoffersen
Scott Polar Research Institute Ronald P. Daanen
University of Cambridge Geophysical Institute
Lensfield Road University of Alaska Fairbanks
Cambridge CB2 1ER 903 Koyukuk Dr.
UK Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320
pc350@cam.ac.uk USA
rdaanen@alaska.edu
John J. Clague
Department of Earth Sciences Prem Datt
Centre for Natural Hazard Research Research and Design Center (RDC)
Simon Fraser University Snow and Avalanche Study Establishment
8888 University Drive Plot No-1, Sector 37-A
Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6 Himparishar 160036, Chandigarh
Canada India
jclague@sfu.ca datt_prem@rediffmail.com
Michael J. Hambrey
Amanda M. Grannas Centre for Glaciology
Department of Chemistry Institute of Geography & Earth Sciences
Villanova University Aberystwyth University
800 Lancaster Ave Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Wales SY23 3DB
Villanova, PA 19085 UK
USA mjh@aber.ac.uk
amanda.grannas@villanova.edu
Jonathan Harbor
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Thomas C. Grenfell Purdue University
Department of Atmospheric Sciences 550 Stadium Mall Dr
University of Washington West Lafayette, IN 47907
Seattle, WA 98195-1640 USA
USA jharbor@purdue.edu
tcg@atmos.washington.edu
Douglas R. Hardy
G. Hilmar Gudmundsson Climate System Research Center and
British Antarctic Survey Department of Geosciences
High Cross Madingley Road University of Massachusetts
Cambridge CB3 0ET Morrill Science Center
UK 611 North Pleasant Street
ghg@bas.ac.uk Amherst, MA 01003-9297
USA
dhardy@geo.umass.edu
Ravi P. Gupta doug.hardy@valley.net
Department of Earth Sciences
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Spencer P. Hardy
Roorkee 247667, UA Hanover High School
India 41 Lebanon St
rpgupta.iitr@gmail.com Hanover, NH 03755
rpgesfes@iitr.ernet.in USA
xxviii CONTRIBUTORS
Christopher A. Hiemstra
Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory C. K. Jain
(CRREL) National Institute of Hydrology
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC Centre for Flood Management Studies
P.O. Box 35170 G. S. Road, Sapta Sahid Path, Mathura Nagar
Fort Wainwright, AK 99703-0170 Dispur, Guwahati 781006, Assam
USA India
Christopher.A.Hiemstra@usace.army.mil ckj_1959@yahoo.co.in
Richard Hodgkins
Department of Geography
Loughborough University Manoj K. Jain
Leicestershire LE11 3TU Department of Hydrology
UK Indian Institute of Technology
r.hodgkins@lboro.ac.uk Roorkee 247667, Uttarakhand
India
jain.mkj@gmail.com
Bryn Hubbard
Centre for Glaciology
Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences
Aberystwyth University Sanjay K. Jain
Llandinam Building National Institute of Hydrology
Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Wales SY23 3DB Roorkee, 247667 Uttarakhand
UK India
byh@aber.ac.uk Sjain@nih.ernet.in
CONTRIBUTORS xxix
William C. Mahaney
Quaternary Surveys Debasmita Misra
26 Thornhill Ave Department of Mining and Geological Engineering
Thornhill, ON L4J 1J4 College of Engineering and Mines
Canada University of Alaska Fairbanks
arkose@rogers.com P.O. Box 755800
bmahaney@yorku.ca Fairbanks, AK 99775-5800
USA
debu.misra@alaska.edu
Shawn J. Marshall
Department of Geography
University of Calgary Vanya I. Miteva
Earth Sciences 356, 2500 University Dr NW Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 The Pennsylvania State University
Canada 211 South Frear
shawn.marshall@ucalgary.ca University Park, PA 16802
USA
Richard A. Marston vim1@psu.edu
Department of Geography
Kansas State University
118 Seaton Hall Thomas Mölg
Manhattan, KS 66506-2904 Center for Climate & Cryosphere
USA University of Innsbruck
Rmarston@ksu.edu 6020 Innsbruck
Rmarston@k-state.edu Austria
CONTRIBUTORS xxxiii
Vijay P. Singh
Yuri Shur Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Texas A&M University
University of Alaska Fairbanks Scoates Hall
245 Duckering Building, P.O. Box 755900 2117 TAMU
Fairbanks, AK 99775-59000 College Station, TX 77843-2117
USA USA
yshur@alaska.edu vsingh@tamu.edu
CONTRIBUTORS xxxvii
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Fiona Tweed
Bussestrasse 24 Department of Geography
27570 Bremerhaven Staffordshire University
Germany College Road
Malte.Thoma@awi.de Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire ST4 2DE
UK
f.s.tweed@staffs.ac.uk
David N. Thomas
School of Ocean Sciences, College of Natural Sciences
Bangor University Michiel Van den Broeke
Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research
UK Utrecht University
d.thomas@bangor.ac.uk Princetonplein 5
3584 CC Utrecht
Netherlands
Anita M. Thompson m.r.vandenbroeke@uu.nl
Department of Biological Systems Engineering
University of Wisconsin-Madison
230 Ag. Eng. Building, 460 Henry Mall
Madison, WI 53706 C. J. van der Veen
USA Department of Geography and
amthompson2@wisc.edu Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets
University of Kansas
203 Lindley Hall
Thierry Toutin 1475 Jayhawk Blvd
Canada Centre for Remote Sensing Lawrence, KS 66045-7613
Natural Resources Canada USA
Ottawa, ON K1A 0Y7 cjvdv@ku.edu
Canada
thierry.toutin@ccrs.nrcan.gc.ca
Veerle Vanacker
TECLIM, Earth and Life Institute
Martyn Tranter University of Louvain
Bristol Glaciology Centre Place L. Pasteur, 3
School of Geographical Sciences 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, BW
University of Bristol Belgium
University Road veerle.vanacker@uclouvain.be
Bristol BS8 1SS
UK
m.tranter@bristol.ac.uk
Dominic Vella
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical
Donna F. Tucker Physics
Department of Geography Institute of Theoretical Geophysics
University of Kansas University of Cambridge
1475 Jayhawk Blvd., Room 213 Wilberforce Road
Lawrence, KS 66045-7613 Cambridge CB3 0WA
USA UK
dtucker@ku.edu d.vella@damtp.cam.ac.uk
Huabiao Zhao
Jacob C. Yde Laboratory of Tibetan Environment Changes and Land
Center for Geomicrobiology Surface Processes (TEL)
University of Aarhus Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research
Ny Munkegade building 1540 Chinese Academy of Sciences
8000 Århus C No. 18 Shuangqing Rd, P.O. Box 2871
Denmark Haidian District, Beijing 100085
and China
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research
University of Bergen H. J. Zwally
Allégaten 55 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
5007 Bergen Greenbelt, MD 20771
Norway USA
yde@phys.au.dk zwally@icesat2.gsfc.nasa.gov
Preface
Snow, ice and glaciers (SIG) are the components constitut- The objective of this Encyclopedia is to present the
ing what is called cryosphere. They exist at all latitudes current state of scientific understanding of various aspects
and contain the majority of the earth’s fresh water. Due of earth’s cryosphere – snow, glaciers, ice caps, ice sheets,
to their dominant prevalence, they influence weather, ice shelves, sea ice, river and lake ice, and permafrost –
climate, ecosystems, vegetation, and life and human activ- and their related interdisciplinary connections under
ities in a variety of ways. Indeed they shape human civili- one umbrella. Therefore, every effort has been made to
zation. Owing to looming climate change and global provide a comprehensive coverage of cryosphere by
warming, temperature changes now seem inevitable and including a broad array of topics, such as the atmospheric
are changing the landscape of snow, ice and glaciers, or processes responsible for snow formation; snowfall obser-
even the existence thereof. In fact, the changes occurring vations; snow cover and snow surveys; transformation
in SIG can be construed as major indicators of climate of snow to ice and changes in their properties; classifica-
change. The nature of cryosphere is highly interdisciplin- tion of ice and glaciers and their worldwide distribution;
ary and calls for an updated interdisciplinary account of its glaciation and ice ages; glacier dynamics; glacier surface
dynamics. Recent decades have witnessed increasing and subsurface characteristics; geomorphic processes
attention to SIG and scientific communities have started and landscape formation; hydrology and sedimentary sys-
working collectively to develop the basic foundation upon tems; hydrochemical and isotopic properties; permafrost
which the broad understanding of cryosphere rests. modeling; hazards caused by cryospheric changes; trends
However, there is still a long way to go. of glacier retreat on a global scale along with the impact of
Discussions on climate change and global warming climate change; and many more quantitative estimates of
now seem to be occupying the center stage in public various glacier parameters, such as degree-day, mass bal-
debates, professional forums, news media, and political dia- ance, extent and volume, and downwasting. Also included
log. As a result, the general public has become much more are articles on GPS application, and satellite image appli-
aware of what is happening to our climate. Since both cation in glaciology; GPR analysis; and sea level rise.
climate change and climate variability have been found For purposes of the Encyclopedia 463 articles were
to be closely linked with the cryosphere, it is important selected. Literature on snow, ice and glaciers has grown
for scientists and professionals in the field of earth, environ- too large to be fully treated in a single volume; therefore,
mental, oceanic and atmospheric sciences to develop the selection of articles included some subjectivity but
a better understanding of this sphere from conceptual, theo- was reviewed by many experts who have long been at
retical, technical and applied viewpoints. This is especially the forefront of research in the field of cryosphere. We
important for snow, ice and glacier covered areas, since truly understand that given the scope of this subject it is
they are rarely stable and are continuously changing in their almost impossible to include each and every topic in this
thickness, areal extent, and flow speeds. Recent advances type of reference book, but we have tried our best to avoid
in field-based studies and quantitative and numerical any glaring omissions or miss something which could sig-
modeling have provided answers to several key questions nificantly hamper the quality of the Encyclopedia. There-
but have also highlighted the urgent need for cryospheric fore, we have made the contents of the Encyclopedia
studies in many areas, for example, contribution of snow, exhaustive, but we understand that we might have missed
ice and glacier melt to the sea level rise; importance of snow certain topics. We are also aware of some partial omis-
and glacier to water resources; and so on. sions. As it frequently happens, willing contributors
xlii PREFACE
cannot unfortunately be always found for all the suggested The contributors represent varying backgrounds and
topics. It may be noted that if the reader does not see an many of them represent WHO’S WHO in the cryosphere.
entry for the particular topic that interests him or her, then It is hoped that the Encyclopedia will serve as a reference
he or she should look in the index because that topic may to scholars and students. The Encyclopedia will also be
have been covered under a different heading and perhaps a valuable resource for geologists, geographers, climatol-
in more than one article. In making the list exhaustive, it ogists, hydrologists, and water resources engineers; as
is possible that there might be a little bit of repetition here well as to those who are engaged in the practice of agricul-
and there, but we do not want readers to read two articles tural and civil engineering, earth sciences, environmental
to understand one. sciences and engineering, ecosystems management, and
The material presented in the articles consists of other relevant fields.
established information on a particular topic and repre- The encyclopedia is comprised of articles under three
sents easily accessible digested knowledge. The level of categories: A, B, and C. Tables 1, 2 and 3 provide a list
material is such that a graduate student can benefit from of major headings of articles included in the encyclopedia
the presentation which is not necessarily from his or her for a quick reference (see List of Articles, pages 1233–
area of expertise. An effort has been made such that each 1237). 64 articles in category A represent major divisions
article stands on its own, without an assumption that and review topics. These also serve to coordinate the
a reader will be seeing any other portion of the Encyclope- widely scattered entries of categories B and C. 182 Cate-
dia. Although entries are presented in alphabetical order, gory B articles constitute building block items, inspired
they have been organized under major compilation head- by textbook subheads, but also the cookbook items. 217
ings which should become particularly obvious when the articles in category C are mini-entries dealing with mate-
reader uses the cross-references with each entry. This is rials, fancy terms, or outdated concepts. All these categor-
not an exhaustive list but hopefully it gives a structure to ical entries on different topics are compiled in an
the Encyclopedia’s contents. Of equal value are the many alphabetical order, with their length being related to their
references given with the entries. relative importance.
This Encyclopedia of Snow, Ice and Glaciers is sup-
posed to provide clear explanations of current topics,
and is not structured as a student textbook, but it is rather March 2011 Vijay P. Singh
for quick access to particular terms and concepts in self- Pratap Singh
contained entries. We hope that this volume will also Umesh K. Haritashya
tempt the casual reader to browse through and become (Editors-in-Chief)
curious about the different facets and foci of cryosphere.
Acknowledgments
This Encyclopedia is a result of the collective contribu- gratefully acknowledged for their constructive reviews.
tions of the authors who were gracious, generous and Their efforts have greatly enhanced the quality of contri-
willing to write different articles. These authors, butions contained in the Encyclopedia. Special thanks
representing five continents, have synthesized the body goes to Tom Allen, Andrew Bush, Etienne Berthier,
of knowledge in their particular area, and therefore the Poul Christoffersen, Graham Cogley, Luke Copland,
quality of the Encyclopedia is a reflection of the quality Moritz Dick, Thomas Grenfell, William Harrison, Robert
of their efforts. We are grateful to these authors. Any Hellstrom, Kenneth Jezek, Richard Lindzen, Frederick
drawbacks are editors’, not authors’. The preparation Nelson, Mauri Pelto, Donald Rapp, and Cornelis
of this Encyclopedia was greatly aided by the assistance Vanderveen.
we received from our International Advisory Board We would also like to acknowledge the constant sup-
members: port and help we received from Petra van Steenbergen,
Richard Armstrong, NSIDC, Boulder, Colorado, USA; Senior Publishing Editor, Earth Sciences and Geography,
Michael P. Bishop, University of Nebraska-Omaha, USA; Dr. Sylvia Blago, Associate Editor MRW and Simone
Helgi Björnsson, Institute of Earth Sciences, Iceland; Giesler, Editorial Assistant, Springer.
Wilfried Haeberli, WGMS, University of Zurich, Iceland; Our families (V.P. Singh: wife Anita, son Vinay,
Johannes Oerlemans, University of Utrecht, Netherlands; daughter-in-law Sonali, and daughter Arti; P. Singh: wife
John F. Shroder, University of Nebraska-Omaha, USA; Anju, sons Arpit and Aman; and U.K. Haritashya: wife
Martyn Tranter, University of Bristol, UK;
Namrata and daughter Vanshika) allowed us to work dur-
We wish to express our deep gratitude to them for their ing holidays, weekends and in night away from them.
invaluable support and encouragement. They provided support and help whenever we needed.
All category A articles and major category B articles Without their patience and love, this volume might not
were peer reviewed. Reviewers of these articles are have been completed, and we are much grateful to them.
Guide to the Reader
For the beginners, it is good to start with a general article, Experts or other readers with background in cryosphere
then track the list of cross-references provided at the end may directly search for specific topics. For example, Ice
of the article to locate similar or relevant articles. Age Cycles: Data, Models, and Uncertainties, or Basal
For example, if one wants to learn about hydrological Sediment Evacuation by Subglacial Drainage Systems.
aspects of snow and glaciers, then one should go to If one does not find the topic one is looking for, it is
Glacier Hydrology and Snow Hydrology, then Melt possible that it may have been covered under a different
Runoff Modeling, then Impacts of Snow and Glaciers on heading. Therefore, one should go to the index that would
Runoff, then Hydrochemical Characteristics of Snow, Ice lead to the articles that may cover the topic of interest.
and Glaciers, then Hydropower: Hydroelectric Power If a reader is looking for more explanation than what is
Generation from Alpine Glacier Melt, or several other already described under any particular topic, then most
specific Snow or Glacier Hydrology related articles. The articles provide important and landmark bibliographic
list of cross-references provided at the end of the article references that relate to both general and research articles.
is not exhaustive, otherwise it would lead to a long listing, Some articles provide older references which allow
rather it is a guide for the reader to find other relevant readers to find the historical aspect of the topic.
articles, which are further cross-referenced.
FJORDS 293
As depth increases, firn porosity decreases and air Domine, F., Lauzier, T., Cabanes, A., Legagneux, L., Kuhs, W. F.,
mixing becomes more restricted (Schwander et al., 1997; Techmer, K., and Heinrichs, T., 2003. Snow metamorphism as
Bender et al., 1997). Seasonal layering can also affect revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy Research
and Technique, 62, 33–48.
the rate of air movement through firn (Albert, 1996) and Fain, X., Ferrari, C. P., Dommergue, A., Albert, M., Battle, M.,
may produce impermeable layers in the non-diffusive Arnaud, L., Barnola, J. M., Cairns, W., Barbante, C., and
zone. These prevent air from equilibrating with that in Boutron, C., 2008. Mercury in the snow and firn at Summit
the diffusive zone (Sowers et al., 1992; Schwander et al., Station, central Greenland and implications for the study of
1997). While air may mix locally, within the summer layer past atmospheric mercury levels. Atmospheric Chemistry and
for example, impermeable winter layers impede its verti- Physics, 8, 3441–3457.
Hawley, R., Waddington, E. D., Morse, D. L., Dunbar, N. W., and
cal diffusion (Fain et al., 2008). Zielinski, G. A., 2002. Dating firn cores by vertical strain mea-
surements. Journal of Glaciology, 48(162).
Firn measurements Schwander, J., Sowers, T., Barnola, J. M., Blunier, T., Fuchs, A.,
and Malaize, B., 1997. Age scale of air in the summit ice: impli-
Borehole logging is used to measure firn properties in situ. cations for glacial-interglacial temperature change. Journal of
These include temperature, density, and vertical strain. Geophysical Research, 102, 19483–19493.
Unlike snow, which must be sampled at depth by digging Sowers, T., Bender, M., Raynard, D., and Korotkevich, Y. S., 1992.
a large snow pit and sampling from the sides, firn has d15N of N2 in air trapped in polar ice: a tracer of gas transport in
enough cohesion (Cohesion) to permit the extraction of the firn and a possible constraint on ice age-gas age differences.
intact cores that are used to measure density, porosity Journal of Geophysical Research, 97(D14), 15,683–15,697.
Spencer, M. K., Alley, R. B., Fitzpatrick, J. J., 2006. Developing a
and permeability, grain size, and anisotropy. bubble number-density paleoclimatic indicator for glacier ice.
Because firn is compressible, seasonal layers thin with Journal of Glaciology, 52(178), 358–364.
depth. It is also porous and subject to the migration of Swinkels, F. B., and Ashby, M. F., 1980. A second report on
chemical species deposited with the snow (Chemical sintering diagrams. Metallurgica, 29, 259–281.
Composition of Snow, Ice, and Glaciers). Both of these
aspects can complicate age-depth calculations. Where Cross-references
annual layers cannot be distinguished optically or from Antarctica
the geochemical record, a density profile produced from Chemical and Microbe Records in Snow and Ice
a borehole log of vertical strain or measurements of mass, Chemical Composition of Snow, Ice, and Glaciers
length, and diameter of core sections can reveal seasonal Cohesion
layering. Geochemistry of Snow and Ice
Glacier
Ice
Summary Isotopic Characteristics of Ice, Snow, and Glaciers
A transitional state between fallen snow and meteoric ice, Layering of Snow
firn is a complex material where vast morphological and Overburden Pressure
Snow Grains
chemical changes are taking place. Stratigraphy of Snowpacks
Temperate Glaciers
Bibliography
Albert, M., 1996. Modeling heat, mass and species transport in polar
firn. Annals of Glaciology, 23, 138–143.
Albert, M. R., 2002. Effects of snow and firn ventilation of sublima- FJORDS
tion rates. Annals of Glaciology, 35, 52–56.
Albert, M. R., and Shultz, E. F., 2002. Snow and firn properties and Umesh K. Haritashya1, Vijay P. Singh2, Pratap Singh3
air-snow transport processes at Summit, Greenland. Atmo- 1
Department of Geology, University of Dayton, Dayton,
spheric Environment, 36(15/16), 2789–2798.
Bender, M., Sowers, T., and Brook, E., 1997. Gases in ice
OH, USA
2
cores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 94, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering,
8343–8349. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
3
Bender, M. L., Floch, G., Chappellaz, J., Suwa, M., Barnola, J.-M., Tahal Consulting Engineers Ltd, New Delhi, India
Blunier, T., Dreyfus, G., Jouzel, J., and Parrenin, F., 2006. Gas
age-ice age differences and the chronology of the Vostok ice
core, 0–100 ka. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(D21),
Synonyms
115–125. Fiord
Colbeck, S. C., 1983. Theory of metamorphism of dry snow. Jour-
nal of Geophysical Research, 88, 5475–5482.
Colbeck, S. C., 1989. Air movements in snow due to wind pumping. Definition
Journal of Glaciology, 35, 209–213.
Craig, H., Horibe, Y., and Sowers, T., 1988. Gravitation separation Fjords are long, narrow, and over-deepened features with
of gasses and isotopes in polar ice caps. Science, 242, steep sides and are carved into bedrock by the glacial
1675–1678. activity and flooded by melting water (Figure 1).
294 FJORDS
Fjords, Figure 1 Fjord as seen in Milford Sound, New Zealand. Photo courtesy Dr. Luke Copland.
Fjords are erosional landforms that represent the move- of glaciers, which becomes lesser and lesser toward the
ment of a glacier within a confined channel along the val- end of the feature.
ley bottom. The movement of a glacier and formation of Sediment deposition in fjords can be related to
fjords is entirely controlled by topography. They are com- retreating glaciers by depositional zones moving in the
mon in the polar regions, but can also be found in subpolar upward direction and hiatuses in retreat by push moraines
and temperate regions (Table 1). Fjords have existed for or morainal banks. Powell and Molnia (1989) has shown
millions of years and they range from a few kilometers various depositional system models associated with
to several tens of kilometers wide and several kilometers retreating glaciers, and he (Powell, 2003) has discussed
long. Because of their location and relationship with the such models in various types of environment from polar
sea level on one side and tectonically active high moun- to temperate. Sediment deposition can also be related to
tains on the other side, they are an important feature. They advancing glaciers in the form of increasing till thickness
also possess unique characteristics of oceanic processes from head of a fjord toward the sea limit.
and ice-ocean interface (Straneo et al., 2010), and there- Fjords also provide critical information about marine
fore, they are appropriately termed as one of the complex limits and relate to with the isostaic uplift of deglaciated
and dynamic landsystems that provide information about outer coasts.
glacial, fluvial, and oceanographic features.
Most fjords are a Palimpsest feature which makes
them an extremely important feature, because they can Bibliography
provide information about the successive glaciations Cowan, E. A., et al., 2010. Fjords as temporary sediment traps: his-
through floor sediments. However, these sediments need tory of glacial erosion and deposition in Muir Inlet, Glacier Bay
to be carefully analyzed, since they may have been buried National Park, southeastern Alaska. GSA Bulletin, 122(7-8),
by younger glacimarine sediments. Fjords act as natural 1067–1080, doi:10.1130/B26595.1.
Powell, R. D., 2003. Subaquatic landsystems: fjords. In Evans,
sediment traps and typically have high sediment accumu- D. J. A. (ed.), Glacial Landsystems. London: Arnold,
lation rates, providing the potential for high-resolution pp. 313–347.
palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental studies on Powell, R. D., and Molnia, B. F., 1989. Glacimarine sedimentary
decadal to centennial timescales and presenting a unique processes, facies and morphology of the South-southeast Alaska
opportunity to study land–ocean interactions. Cowan shelf and fjords. Marine Geology, 85, 359–390.
et al. (2010) used the fjord sediment to identify two prom- Straneo, F., et al., 2010. Rapid circulation of warm subtropical
waters in a major glacial fjord in East Greenland. Nature Geosci-
inent glacial erosion surfaces associated with Last Glacial ence, 3, 182–186, doi:10.1038/ngeo764.
Maximum advance and Little Ice Age advance. Fjords
comprise several rock basins, but many of them are
deepest at the beginning and become gradually shallower Cross-references
toward the sea. This could be related to the erosive power Sediment Core and Glacial Environment Reconstruction
Fjords, Table 1 Some of the major local controls on modern fjord landsystems (Adopted from Powell, 2003)
Sediment contribution
Glacial Glacifluvial Marine Terrestrial
Glacial Internal
Climatic flow ice Bed Subglacial En-/ En-/ Sea Mass
zone velocity condition condition water free Glacier terminus Sub- supra Sub- supra icebergs ice biogenic Fluvial flow Wind Modern examples