Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Revised) For Odcrfr Final Manuscript
(Revised) For Odcrfr Final Manuscript
_________________________________________
to the
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
by
APPROVAL SHEET
Research Adviser
________________________________________________
ACCEPTANCE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
individuals who offered their help and support in the process of formulating
their time, expertise, and valuable insights in reviewing and evaluating this
have greatly enriched the quality of our study, for which we are sincerely
appreciative.
analysis has been a crucial part of the integrity of the research findings.
endeavor. This research would not have been possible without their
solace, and more often than not - our pillar of shared hope and
Page
TITLE PAGE i
ENDORSEMENT SHEET ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT iv
ABSTRACT vi
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
Rationale 1
Research Objectives 2
Definition of Terms 6
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
Theoretical Background 9
Conceptual Framework 25
3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design 26
Research Environment 26
Research Respondents 26
Research Instruments 28
Research Procedure 31
Gathering of Data 31
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 36
ANALYSIS
Level of Resilience 47
RECOMMENDATION
Summary of Findings 54
Conclusion 54
Recommendations 56
REFERENCES 59
APPENDICES
A TRANSMITTAL LETTER/S 70
F RESEARCH BUDGET 88
G RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION 89
DOCUMENTATION
CURRICULUM VITAE 93
v
Figure
Abstract
Despite the abundance of research on children's resilience, there is a
noticeable gap in the investigation of factors contributing to parental
resilience. Mothers, in their roles as initial mentors, companions, and
protectors, play a pivotal role in shaping their children's development. This
study aimed to determine the level of resilience and perceived social
support of selected working mothers in barangay Labangon Cebu, City.
Consequently, the relation of these two variables were also determined
using a descriptive correlational survey method. This study was conducted
with 300 working mothers that were gathered through a convenience
sampling technique, utilizing the Wagnild and Young Resilience Scale
(RS) and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) as
the research instruments. The findings showed that the majority of working
mothers perceived a high level of social support (233, 74.00%) and the
minority perceived to have low levels of social support (9, 3%). Meanwhile,
it was revealed that mothers perceived a high level of support from their
family (250, 84.0%). Which is slightly higher than receiving support from
significant others (160, 83.33%), and support from friends was found to be
the lowest (160, 55.3%). As for resilience, findings showed that the
majority of the working mothers have exceptional resilience (129, 43.00%)
and relatively close results indicate having intermediate resilience (125,
41.67%) while the minority was having poor resilience (46, 15.33%).
Moreover, results revealed that there has been a significant and moderate
positive relationship between the two variables with a correlation
coefficient of 0.436 and p-value of 0.00. It is recommended to implement
programs and interventions for working mothers to help sustain and
strengthen their connection to social networks and as well as their innate
resiliency. For future studies, it is recommended to use other sampling
techniques to fully address the research objectives. And lastly, to explore
other potential moderators and predictors of the resilience and perceived
social support of working mothers.
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Rationale
spouse, extended family and friends was found related to five aspects of
raising their children, it's important to figure out what influences women's
protect, care, and raise their children with morals that will improve them as
protector. Mothers would sacrifice anything for the best of their children,
2
no matter what their children's interests whether they are married or single
Research Objectives
Labangon, Cebu City for a period of eight (8) months year 2023-2024.
following:
1.1 High
1.2 Moderate
1.3 Low
2.1 Family
2.2 Friends
in terms of:
3.1 Poor
3.2 Intermediate
3.3 Exceptional
into their perceived social support and resilience levels, allowing them to
structures, create new ones, and promote mental health awareness within
Cebu City. The study's primary goal was to better understand the
assistance they received from family, friends, and significant others. This
5
environment.
study which may bring a gap to the future researchers to fully grasp the
factors.
association, the study did not investigate the impact of specific treatments
did not arise nor impacted research findings, and therefore did not cause
any unpredictability.
Definition of Terms
Family. It is the extent to which the individual feels supported and cared for
feels they receive from their friends as it gauges the individual's perception
Social Support:
7
significant other.
significant other.
significant other.
from adversity.
refining of resilience
skills.
adversity. Individuals at
navigate challenging
situations.
9
Chapter 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Theoretical Background
their jobs and their children. They receive support from family, friends, and
coworkers, which makes them feel better when things are difficult. They've
faced challenges before and learned how to deal with them, so they're
better prepared for future ones. Despite the challenges, working mothers
disciplines, including psychology and social science. Its primary aim was
fulfill their responsibility of raising their children and spending quality time
with them. (Dalhag et al., 2019). However, some chose to give up the
opportunity to be a full time mother and spend most of their time at the
workplace (Dettol, 2018). It can be a very wise and practical decision for a
family member to allow them to stop and work or take a break from it.
resilience, recognizing that while hardship may be difficult for one's mental
Philippines’, there are many more responsibilities that come with being a
working mother with a family. Which may alter their lives in certain ways.
stress. Whether their kids are doing well is something they consider
constantly. They also cannot deny that their actions were motivated by
has been found that there was a correlation between difficult life paths
negative life outcomes for both young mothers and their offspring, many of
social support and was not purely an innate quality. Understanding the
obstacles.
adaptive skills.
for this study, Cohen and Wills' Social Support Theory (1993) was used
and had been critical in influencing the knowledge of how perceived social
outcomes. At its foundation, the idea contends that because humans are
forms of support. They may rely on family, friends, and trusted caregivers
and benefit from practical help with household tasks. Additionally, social
career advice. These networks also play a crucial role in relieving feelings
mothers utilize their social circles to share resources, information, and tips
personal lives (Dalhag et al., 2019). Several studies have explored the
2006), mothers of children with clefts (2003), mothers of children who are
deaf (Sipal, 2012) and mothers of 6-18 month-old children with and
stress than mothers of typical children. With these, Cohens and Wills
into several forms and individuals are better suited to cope with challenges
14
psychological strain.
members are among the other social network users who assist new dads
recognized that not all social links give equal support. Variations in the
dealing with stressors and obstacles. Cohen and Wills (1993) claim that
stress, implying that perceived social support may reduce the impact of
support, provides a complex lens for exploring how each type links to
threats and adversity and the ability to continue and grow in the face of
has never been a simple job, and challenges are constant. Social support
support shapes coping, but coping shapes the result (Schwarzer & Knoll,
Bayrakli 2010). The researchers would like to find out whether this is true
strategy for building resilience. Hannon et. al. (2023) also added that
resilience factors do not only come from an individual perspective but are
Women emphasized the need for inclusive or holistic research and pointed
17
evolved significantly from what it is meant to be. They face new and
(2008) also stated that family support including the length, type, and
model of marital status are the most vital factors influencing the
high levels of resiliency among single mothers (Nadolska and Sek, 2007,
child. When it comes to female workers, managing their family and career
vicious circle, which can turn into a spiral of loss, could consequently be
about Robert et al. (2016) who conducted a study about Stress Levels and
of 100 mothers from Barangay Labangon, Cebu City, were the focus of the
study and survey. Results indicated that mothers with children between
the ages of 5 and 12 appear to face similar stressors, so there is not much
strategies used by mothers. The study found that having children entails
having a financial burden. These are the primary causes of the mothers'
her life and provide her with few choices (Robert et al. 2016).
had intellectual disabilities made up the statistical population for this study.
analysis results, strength and perceived social support account for 24% of
resilience.
children with intellectual disabilities and 234 mothers of children who are
groups agreed with the model, which demonstrated that the quantity and
influenced resiliency.
that even though mothers of children who stutter possess the necessary
more in mothers than in fathers because mothers perform the primary role
of caregiving (Vilaseca et al., 2014). Al-Farsi et al. (2016) and Hayes et. al
(2013) stated that there are instances that their burden is differentiated
21
around the type of disability with parents caring for children with autism
cross-sectional survey that involved 128 mothers with IDD whose children
were between the ages of four and eighteen. Consistent evidence was
which assesses the children's developmental level, were all used to gather
data. A significant difference was found between the two groups' mothers'
22
levels of stress and perceive less social support from their peers. As a
additional information, lessen mothers' stress, and offer the proper social
support.
with ASDs in interviews. According to the findings, more than half of the
mothers tested positive for significant psychological distress, and this was
linked to both raising a child with more challenging behavior and having
petite family support. Mothers who had a boy with ASD were single
receiving less support from their partners. The study looked into areas
where people could benefit from assistance and unmet needs, including
significant role in the family by not only being a protective factor towards
support to cope up with the challenges and stressors they faced. One of
the studies that supports this is the study by Tarkka (1996) entitled, “Social
were more likely to experience both proximal and distal stressors, their
found how factors like high social support contributes to the high resilience
mothers. Offer et al. (2010) shed light on the complex dynamics of support
Additionally, Benin & Keith (1995) found that differing ethnic groups
and social support boost the mothers dedication and make them resilient
(Greef et al., 2006). With the information gathered from the related
Conceptual Framework
Relationship
relationship between two key factors which are perceived social support and
shed light on how support networks influenced the ability of working mothers
Understanding this connection was crucial for gaining insights into the
Chapter 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
survey design. The descriptive method was used to determine the levels of
perceived social support and resilience. The correlational method was used to
The survey method was used to gather data in levels of perceived social
Research Environment
determined by the 2020 census. There are approximately fifty four (54) sitios
programs and activities, which made the locale suited for the selection of
Research Respondent
workers or currently employed full time, (2) must be living or cohabiting with a
27
partner and; (3) should have at least one child living in the same household.
Moreover, they were excluded in the study if they met the following exclusion
criteria: (1) currently employed but living in different households and residing
outside the geographical area (i.e. overseas workers); (2) their children are at
the age range of 18 years and above; and (3) not a primary caregiver of their
Barangay Labangon Cebu City. Out of the fifty-four sitios in the barangay, only
fifty (50) sitios were accommodated since the remaining four (4) were
sitio were given flyers and handouts indicating the details of the research data
collection. Individuals who responded to the pre-survey and met the criteria for
Researchers then asked for the contact number of the representative in each
sitio in order to have proper communication during the actual data collection.
utilized the same tool to measure the perceived social support with the total
working mothers.
28
Research Instrument
among the respondents, the study utilized two (2) self-report questionnaires to
Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and the Wagnild and Young Resilience
Scale (RS).
other. On a seven-point Likert scale, respondents score how much they agree
of a person's life.
values of .87 for the Family subscale, .85 for the Friends subscale, and .91 for
the Significant Other subscale. These high alpha values indicate a high level
MSPSS scale was determined to be .88, indicating that all three subscales
were internally consistent. Furthermore, the overall test-retest reliability for the
MSPSS scale was judged to be .85 over time. This demonstrates consistency
and replicability over time, strengthening its validity as a tool for measuring
challenges.
This self-report questionnaire can be used for both online and offline
for rating the interpretation, with a score ranging from 25 to 175. The scoring
indicated that the participants' total scores were added. Based on the
predicted normal distribution, the authors considered values of 147 and above
intermediate range, and values less than 121 to be poor resilience (Girtler et
al., 2010).
In terms of reliability, the Wagnild and Young Resilience Scale (RS) has
a high coefficient alpha of 0.91, suggesting that the scale's items are highly
correlations, which range from 0.37 to 0.75, with the majority lying between
0.50 and 0.70, confirm the scale's internal consistency. These correlations
were not only considerable, but also statistically significant, demonstrating the
Support (MSPSS) and Wagnild and Young Resilience Scale (RS) for the
procedure improved the scales' reliability and validity, allowing for meaningful
testing was administered with the same sample size for the identified research
how consistent the items within the scale are in measuring the same
underlying concept. Additionally, it means that the items on the scale are
strongly correlated with each other, suggesting that the scale reliably
Research Procedures
Gathering of Data
The primary step in this study included sending for approval and
transmittal letter to conduct the study, which was sent to the good office of
permissions from the authors and developers of the research tools were also
followed afterwards.
32
pre-survey since the census for the target population was not yet available.
Pre-survey results were then used to establish the sampling frame and
participant sample size in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria
and with the related literature utilizing the same tool for the same participants.
The instruments were also translated both forward and backward by the
the validity and reliability of the instruments with the intended sample size.
survey questionnaires and informed them of the time and location of the
pre-survey, and they were divided into clusters. The first five sitios were
cluster 1 and were followed accordingly. In each cluster, the location for the
actual data collection was in the epicenter chapel of the sitios. The
researchers conducted the data collection in fifty (50) sitios for a total of ten
(10) clusters.
Before proceeding to the actual data collection, pilot testing was first
data were then analyzed and tested for its validity by getting the Cronbach
33
alpha. After ensuring its validity and consistency, the researchers then
purpose of the study. Next, informed consents were given to the participants
containing the risks and benefits and contained permission waivers for their
clarified to the participants the guidelines and instructions for answering both
surveys.
Cebu City specifically at the respective chapels in each cluster with a duration
Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and the Wagnild and Young Resilience
Scale (RS), which were recognized for its validity and reliability, were given to
allowing and allotting time to voluntarily participate in the study. This includes
giving them snacks and initiating a raffle draw. Every cluster, there were two
participants who won 5 kilos of rice and another two participants who won a
accuracy, integrity, and security of the study. Raw data was stored in a digital
format. Robust backup systems, like backups to external drives and OneDrive,
were used to prevent data loss. Ethical considerations were considered, which
belonging to the low, moderate, and high perceived support groups were
The relationship between the level of Perceived Social Support and the
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
City, the participants' rights, well-being, and privacy are of the utmost
study, chosen participants were given detailed information on the study's goal,
voluntary informed consent, ensuring that they are aware of their rights and
kept secret, and data were anonymized. Individual replies were not linked
password-protected platforms with limited access. The only party with access
to the obtained data was the study team. Individual participants were not
Participating in this study did not cause harm to the participants or any
potential physical, emotional, and psychological risk during the conduct of the
37
participants.
Chapter 4
ANALYSIS
3. Levels of Resilience
Table 1.0
Low Support 9 3%
distributions. The results indicated that out of the 300 respondents, the
majority perceived high levels of social support (223, 74%). This may
suggest that working mothers had a high perception of support from their
low support from various social networks (9, 3%). Which may suggest
from their various social networks like their family, friends and significant
The data may imply that the barangay Labangon community has
which may have affected the level of perception of social support among
Metro Cebu and other parts of Cebu Province and the Visayas (Women’s
community and with this, they were able to overcome the difficulties ahead
Moreover, this may also imply that they perceived their family,
them. They may have also been granted practical help and
study confirmed the findings of the previous research which stated that
the more responsibilities working mothers have, the higher they perceive
Consistent with the study of Kim (2012), which reported that working
mothers who did not work across various domains. Consequently, several
cerebral palsy (Skok et al., 2006), mothers of children with clefts (2003),
mothers of children who are deaf (Sipal, 2012) and mothers of 6-18
Table 2.0.
Moderate f 40 125 69
Low f 10 15 11
from their family members, friends, and significant others. The three levels
of social support being either low, moderate, or high support from all the
42
from their significant other (220, 73.37%) as well. These numbers may
that they perceived as much more dependable and reliable, and would
perhaps entail that their significant others may have had a lesser impact
family refers to the original familial unit of the working mothers such as
their parents and extended family, whereas significant others are referred
significant others.
bond and assistance from their families, which may imply positive
43
contribution to their outlook on life among the working mothers. The data
may imply that working mothers have received the emotional help and
members, how they relate and support one another, and how they care for
one another is what makes a Filipino family (Tarroja, 2010), and therefore
This data implied that working mothers perceive substantial support for
and promoting overall mental health. They may have received emotional
assistance and support from their significant other during times of need,
challenges of both their personal and professional lives (Rini et al. 2008).
Such findings from the levels of perceived social support in the present
they are supported and cared for by their friends or peers. This could be
as cited in Amah, 2019) which stated that role strain among working
relationships within both familial and social circles to promote the mental
highlights the need for interventions and support programs that recognize
fulfilled a unique role in the lives of working mothers. It highlighted the vital
Levels of Resilience
calculating the weighted mean. The levels were analyzed using the
Table 3.0
Note. 121 below, Poor Resilience; 121 – 146, Intermediate Resilience; 147 and
above, Exceptional Resilience
had a solid ability to deal with and overcome tough situations. They might
resilience levels closely align with those found in exceptional levels (125,
resilience skills (Wagnild et al., 1993). For the least yet necessary of the
among the participants. The findings with higher percentage suggests that
and in health and wellness. From these findings, it could be implied that
which they found that mothers made the initiatives to recalibrate their
relied on the resilience of their children and partners. The findings from the
analyzed data could confirm studies with similar findings that there is proof
mothers (Cassé, 2015), and self-efficacy and emotion regulation were also
community support, career success and stability and healthier aging. This
Table 4.0
Resilience rs=0.436*;
p=0.00 ____
Table 4.0 shows the value of the correlation coefficient between the
level of perceived social support and the level of resilience using the
Spearman rho correlation method. The findings indicated that there was a
51
the 0.05 alpha level, indicating a meaningful relationship between the two
The data in this study may imply that working mothers who exhibit
higher levels of perceived social support also tend to report higher levels
could be indicated that due to the correlation of both variables, they may
be able to perform well in their jobs. This supported the study of Alaba et
al. (2019) stating that working mothers' job satisfaction was significantly
and overall well-being as indicated by Irak (2022) that resilience and social
satisfaction. In turn, it may have led them to have the ability to reach and
Labangon like offering livelihood and skills training, recreation and sports
2022).
member, and other people in the mothers’ life. With the findings analyzed,
with each other. When working mothers are faced with certain difficulties,
this causes them to perceive support from various social networks and
theory of Cohens and Wills Social Support Theory (1993) which highlights
53
the idea that because humans are naturally social animals, they rely on
Hence, this addresses the knowledge gap of the study which is to explore
the perceived social support and resilience of local working mothers in the
networks of the working mothers will greatly affect their level of resilience.
community.
54
Chapter 5
preset inclusion and exclusion criteria, ensuring that the sample was
and the Wagnild and Young Resilience Scale (RS). The MSPSS assessed
Summary of Findings
Meanwhile, the minority of the working mothers perceived low support (9,
3%). This may imply that working mothers received emotional and
subscales being Family, Friends, and Significant Others. For the Family
those having low levels of support (10, 3.33%). As for the Friends
constituted having low levels of support (15, 5.00%). Then for the
high levels of support (220, 73.33%), while the minority of the respondents
Which may imply that they have an exceptional desire and capacity to
support and the levels of resilience among the working mothers, are
56
perceive a high level of support they may also tend to report a higher level
Conclusion
made:
Recommendations
working mothers.
59
References
https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/f/R_Adams_Sociology_2006.pdf
https://doi.org/10.26714/jkj.8.4.2020.505-514
401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2019.1649636
Annisah, A., Trihandini, I., & Rahayu, E. (2023). The Effect of Family
https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i4.1103
https://vid.brage.unit.no/vid-xmlui/handle/11250/2825396
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.2007.00016.x
variables. ResearchGate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327473993_Perceived_S
ocial_Support_among_working_women_with_respect_to_various_s
ocio-demographic_variable
https://doi.org/10.1177/019251395016003003
https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840707312237
Cairney, J., Boyle, M., Offord, D. R., & Racine, Y. (2003b). Stress, social
61
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-003-0661-
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00127-003-0661-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42844-023-00102-3
Cassé, J. F. H., Finkenauer, C., Oosterman, M., van der Geest, V. R., &
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515614280
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-01119-001
122(4), 1259–1296.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118785577https://doi.org/10.1111/j.
1475-6811.2004.00069.x
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420001121
https://www.scielo.br/j/ape/a/tBRHcGN6MVDL4fRpYVCrS7H/?lang
https://www.dettol.co.in/expert-advice/your-family/five-new-challeng
es-every-modern-mom-is-facing/
https://doi.org/10.52461/pjap.v2i1.860
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183703
63
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103943
https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1329192
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13762
İrak, D. U., Bozkurt, F., & Kurşun, İ. B. (2022). Personality and resilience:
267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2022.2114910
64
5(7), 2905-2910
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48572-9_3
Karos, K., McParland, J. L., Bunzli, S., Devan, H., Hirsh, A. T.,
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002004
Morillo, H. M., Capuno, J. J., & Mendoza, A. M. (2013). Views and Values
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-12341278
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310364221
65
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2010.506026
Robert, B., Cando, J., & Villacastin, L. (2016). L. Stress levels and coping
(1), 231-242
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.147.6.598
Sheykhangafshe, F. B., Shabahang, R., Niri, V. S., Asef, Z. N., & Ashtiani,
Tarkka, M., & Paunonen, M. (1996). Social support and its impact
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4553363
https://doi.org/10.22054/jpe.2016.5285
Uddin, M. (2021). The role of family social support on work stress for
İrak, D. U., Bozkurt, F., & Kurşun, İ. B. (2022). Personality and resilience:
267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2022.2114910
https://youthrex.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ResilienceScale.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312456166_A_methodolo
gical_review_of_resilience_measurement_scales
https://wrcv.org/about-us/
401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2019.1649636
Lebert-Charron, A., Wendland, J., Vivier-Prioul, S., Boujut, É., & Dorard,
https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2021.1986766
https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/28216/04chapter4
-1.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y
Matsui, T., Ohsawa, T., & Onglatco, M.-L. (1995). Work-Family Conflict
https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.1034
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344705002
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED326824
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130403
https://doi.org/10.29244/jcfcs.1.3.185-195
https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002864
Turner, L. H., Ekachai, D., & Slattery, K. (2022). How Working Mothers
https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2058510
69
perspective.https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/52874352/07_Re
visiting_the_Definitions_and_Concept_of_Filipino_Family__A_Psyc
hological_Perspective-libre.pdf?1493440642=&response-content-di
sposition=inline%3B+filename%3DRevisiting_the_Definition_and_
Concept_of.
Uysal Irak, D., Bozkurt, F., & Kurşun, İ. B. (2022). Personality and
1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2022.2114910
http://184.168.115.16/index.php/jppw/article/view/175
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
70
Appendix A
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
71
72
Appendix B
Introduction:
This informed consent means that you are encouraged to participate in a
research study, prior to opting to join, you must be aware of the study's
goals, methods, risks, rewards, and respondent rights. Before giving
consent to participate, please carefully read this informed consent and feel
free to ask any questions to the researchers.
Study Procedures:
If the respondent agrees to participate, it will be asked to do the following:
● Respond to a survey questionnaire about assessing the level of
perceived social support and resilience.
● Provide honest and accurate information.
Statement of Confidentiality:
We take your privacy and the confidentiality of your information very
seriously. Your participation in this study will be entirely anonymous.
73
Voluntary Participation:
Your participation in this study is entirely voluntary. You have the right to
choose whether or not to participate and to withdraw your consent at any
time without penalty or prejudice. Your decision will not affect your current
or future relationship with the researchers, your employer, or any affiliated
institutions.
Termination of Participation:
You have the option of participating in this study or not. If you volunteer to
participate in this study, you have the right to withdraw your permission at
any time without penalty. If you choose to participate, you can decide to
skip any question or withdraw from the study at any point without providing
a reason. Your comfort and well-being are our primary concern, and you
will face no consequences for choosing not to participate or for
discontinuing your involvement in the study.
Consent:
Participant's Name:
Participant's Signature:
Date:
74
Appendix C
Appendix D – 1
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
English Version
Instructions: We are interested in how you feel about the following statements.
Read each statement carefully. Indicate how you feel about each statement.
Circle the “1” if you Very Strongly Disagree
Circle the “2” if you Strongly Disagree
Circle the “3” if you Mildly Disagree
Circle the “4” if you are Neutral
Circle the “5” if you Mildly Agree
Circle the “6” if you Strongly Agree
Circle the “7” if you Very Strongly Agree
Cebuano Version
7.Makasalig ko sa
akong mga higala kung
mahimong dili maayo
ang mga butang.
8. Maka-estorya ko sa
akong mga problema
ngadto sa akong
pamilya.
9.Aduna koy mga higala
nga mapa-ambit nako
ang akong kalipay ug
kasakit.
10.Adunay ispesyal nga
tawo sa akong kinabuhi
nga nibati sa akong
gibati.
11 Andam akong
pamilya sa pagtabang
kanako og himog mga
desisyon.
12.Maka-estorya ko sa
akong mga problema
ngadto sa akong mga
higala.
80
Appendix D – 1.1
0.883
Note. item 'F' correlates negatively with the total scale and probably should be reversed
Family Subscale
Scale Reliability
Statistics
Cronbach's
α
scal 0.946
e
Friends Subscale
Cronbach's α
0.758
Scale Reliability
Statistics
Cronbach's
α
scal 0.746
e
81
Appendix D – 2
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
English Version
Instructions:
Circle the answer that shows how much you agree or disagree with
each statement below.
Disagree Agree
1. When I make plans I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
follow through with them.
2. I usually manage one 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
way or another.
3. I am able to depend 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
on myself more than
anyone else.
4. Keeping interested in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
things is important to
me.
5. I can be on my own if 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have to.
6. I feel proud that I have 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
accomplished things in
life.
7. I usually take things in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
my stride.
8. I am friends with 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
myself.
9. I feel that I can handle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
many things at a time.
10. I am determined. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11. I seldom wonder 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
what the point of it all is.
12. I take things one day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
at a time.
13. I can get through 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
difficult times because
I’ve experienced
difficulty before.
14. I have self-discipline. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
15. I keep interested in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
things.
16. I can usually find 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
something to laugh
about.
82
Cebuano Version
Mga Panghimangno:
Lingini ang imong tubag nga nagpakita kung muuyon ba ka o di muuyon
sa kada pahayag.
Dili
muuyon Muuyon
Appendix D – 2.1
scale 0.772
Note. items 'F', 'H', 'P', 'U', and 'Y' correlate negatively with the total scale and probably should be
reversed
86
Appendix E
Septemb Novemb
October Decemb
er er January February March April
Activities er
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Topic Of Interest
Formulation
RRL Matrix
Rationale
formulation
Research
Objectives
Drafting
Research
Adviser
Consultation
Rationale and
Variable of
interest review
Research
Adviser
Consultation
(face-to-face)
Data Collection
tools selection
Research
Respondents
selection
Chapter 1 and 2
formulation and
revisions
Chapter 3
formulation
Chapter 1 to 3
review
87
Research
Adviser
Consultation
Appendices
Finalizing thesis
proposal
Thesis proposal
review
Thesis proposal
Processing
Ethics Review
Processing
Transmittal
Letter
Pilot Testing
Actual Data
Collection
Data Analysis
Chapter 4-5
Formulation
Statistician
Consultation
Research
Adviser
Consultation
Chapter 4-5
Revisions
Oral Defense
88
Appendix F
RESEARCH BUDGET
Total P 18,495
89
Appendix G
Pilot Testing
90
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal Background
Educational Background
2009
Elementary Level
2013
Secondary Level
2017
Tertiary Level
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal Background
Educational Background
2013
Elementary Level
2020
Secondary Level
2025
Tertiary Level
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal Background
Educational Background
2014
Elementary Level
2020
Secondary Level
2024
Tertiary Level
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal Background
Educational Background
2013
Elementary Level
2018
Secondary Level
2024
Tertiary Level