Obstetric History and Heart Rate Response of Newborns To Sounds Kittner, S. and Lipsitt, L.

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Develop. Med. Child Neurol. 1916.

18, 460-470

Obstetric History and the Heart-rate Response


of Newborns to Sound
Steven Kittner Lewis P. Lipsitt

Introduction auditory stimulation may be an important


It has been suggested that the inability factor in the mother-infant interaction. It
to adequately evaluate the behavioral and has been reported that newborns can
neurological condition of a newborn infant respond to their mother’s voice by head-
is perhaps the greatest deficiency in peri- turning as early as the third day of life and
natal medicine (Gluck 1974). Evaluative can distinguish this voice from other
techniques are needed, not only by those voices (Andre-Thomas and Autgaerden
concerned with the continuing welfare of 1966, Hammond 1970).
the child, but also by the obstetrician and Secondly, studies employing other de-
anesthesiologist who wish to know the pendent measures have suggested that
consequences of their procedures. habituation may be delayed in newborns
Parmelee et al. (1974) developed a com- who have suffered perinatal complications
prehensive approach to this problem, in (Bronshtein et al. 1958, Eisenberg et al.
which behavioral performances as well as 1966). Schulman (1970) compared the
pregnancy, perinatal, and neonatal bio- heart-rate response to auditory stimuli of
logical events are included in the initial low-risk and high-risk pre-term infants and
risk assessment of each newborn. The found a difference in the latency of the
present study is an attempt to develop an response. Although a significant decrement
additional behavioral measure for such a in the accelerative heart-rate response be-
larger assessment battery. tween trials 1 to 5 and 26 to 30 was found
The study was concerned with the for both groups, Schulman did not use a
relationship between obstetric history and novel auditory stimulus at the end of the
newborn behavior. Its purpose was to procedure and hence it cannot be deter-
determine whether two groups of infants mined whether both groups habituated
differing in obstetric history would also according to the definition of Thompson
differ in their heart-rate response to a and Spencer (1966), which requires a test
series of auditory stimuli during the first of dishabituation. The design of the present
few days of life. study allows one to check for differential
The heart-rate response to auditory habituation of the heart-rate response be-
stimuli was selected as a test item for three tween two groups.
reasons. First, the newborn response to Thirdly, the direction of the heart-rate

Correspondence to Lewis P. Lipsitt, Professor of Psychology and Medical Science, Brown University,
Providence, Rhode Island 02912.
460
STEVEN KITTNER LEWIS P. LIPSITT

response is also an important dependent given to the further study of this psycho-
variable. Drawing upon the work of Lacey biological measure as a newborn assess-
(1959) and Sokolov (1963) and an exten- ment item. Positive findings would also
sive review of the research on heart-rate contribute towards an understanding of
response in adult human subjects, Graham individual differences in newborn behavior.
and Clifton (1 966) suggested that decelera-
tion is a component of the orienting reflex Method
and is associated with stimulus intake. In Sixteen newborns born at the Women
contrast, cardiac acceleration was sug- and Infants’ Hospital of Rhode Island
gested to be a component of the defensive were studied. The infants, all of them
reflex associated with stimulus rejection. bottle-fed, were selected on the basis of the
Much work with newborns has been number of non-optimal obstetric con-
interpreted in terms of these suppositions ditions from Prechtl’s list (Table I) entered
(Graham and Jackson 1970, Kearsley 1973, in the infants’ hospital records.
Clifton 1974, Porges 1974). In addition,
there is evidence that the direction of the The following categories of infants were
heart-rate response to stimulation is a excluded : ( I ) infants of less than 38 weeks
stable individual difference in the newborn gestational age or weighing less than 24958
period (Clifton and Graham 1968, Jacklin (5.51b) at birth; (2) infants whose clinical
1972. Thus another hypothesis of the condition at birth was such that they were
present experiment was that there might placed in special-care nurseries; and (3)
be increased acceleration and decreased infants whose parents were living outside
deceleration responses in infants who had the Providence area, because of incon-
a difficult birth history compared with venience for possible follow-up studies.
those with a relatively benign history. The first categories prevented testing of
infants who were pre-term, small for
The number of non-optimal obstetric gestational age, or who had any known or
conditions from the list of Prechtl (1968) suspected abnormality. Therefore the study
was used as a measure of the difficulty of was of essentially normal newborns, with
each birth. Prechtl selected these variables greater and lesser recorded indications of
on the basis of the risk of mortality during ‘perinatal hazard’. No infant was accepted
delivery and the first two weeks of life. for study without the written consent of
Specific information on the pre-delivery the mother and the child’s pediatrician.
medication of the mother of each child was The selected newborns comprised two
obtained, since drug conditions might be groups: a ‘Low Prechtl’ group (Lpr) with
expected to have extraordinary effects in a three or fewer non-optimal conditions, and
study of this type (Bowes et al. 1970, a ‘High Prechtl’ group (HPr) containing
Aleksandrowicz 1974). It is important to newborns with seven or more non-optimal
know whether an infant’s psychobiological conditions. There were eight infants in
responsivity is determined principally by each group, four male and four female.
ante-partum drugs, by multiple obstetric Interestingly, the HPr and Lpr groups had
factors, or by individual genotypic significantly different Apgar scores at 1
variation. minute (t = 2-38, df = 14, p < .05), but
If the heart-rate response to auditory this difference was reduced to non-
stimulation differentiates newborns having significant effect at 5 minutes. Table I1
disparate birth histories, independently of summarizes the characteristics of each
drug effects, strong support would be group.
46 1
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY. 1976, 18

TABLE I
Non-optimal obstetric conditions*

Maternal Factors
1. Maternal age primipara < 18 or > 30, multipara < 20 or > 30 yrs
2. Unmarried. divorced or widowed
3. Parity 0 or’ > 6
4. Abortions > 2
5. Pelvic disproportion
6. Luetic infection
7. Rh antagonism
8. Blood-group incompatibility
9. Nutritional state poor
10. Hemoglobin level < 12g/l
11. Bleeding during pregnancy
12. Infection during pregnancy
13. Abdomen X-rayed during pregnancy
14. Toxemia, moderate or severe
15. Blood pressure > 135/90
16. Albuminuria and edema
17. Hyperemesis
18. Psychological stress
19. Unwanted sterility > 2 years
20. Maternal chronic diseases
Parturition
21. Twins or multiple birth
22. Delivery induced or by caesarean section
23. First stage duration < 6 or > 24hrs
24. Second stage duration < IOmin or >2hrs
25. Inadequate contractions
26. Drugs other than O2or local anesthetic given mother
27. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid
28. Membranes broken >6hrs
Feral Factors
29. Intra-uterine position other than vertex
30. Gestational age <38 or >4lwks
31. Fetal presentation other than vertex
32. Cardiac irregularity
33. Fetal heart-rate (second stage) < 100 or > 160
34. Cord around neck other than loosely
35. Cord prolapse
36. Knot in cord
37. Placental infarction, moderate or severe
38. Respiration onset c lmin
39. Resuscitation given
40. Drugs given
41. Body temperature other than normal
42. Birth weight < 5 . 5 or 212.5 Ib (c2495g or >5670g)
-

*Adapted from Prechtl (1968) pp. 306-307

Maternal Pre-delivery Medication time (d x t) score. A narcotics (N) and


Table I11 shows the drug weighting +
barbiturate (B) subtotal (N B subtotal)
system used in the present experiment. was obtained for the d x t score of each
This scoring system is a modification of mother’s drugs since, of the drugs found
that used by Stechler (1964) and by in this study, only narcotics and bar-
Standley er al. (1974). For each drug ad- biturates have a documented effect on
ministration, the dose weighting factor (d) newborn behavior (Kron et al. 1966, 1968;
is multiplied by the appropriate time Brackbill et al., 1974aJ). A total drug
weighting factor (t) to obtain the drug-by- score was obtained for each mother by
462
SlEVEN KITINER LEWJS P. LIPSIlT

TABLE I1
Mean and standard deviations of the low and high Prechtl groups

Prechtl group
Cliaracterisric
LOW(n = 8) High (ti :8)
M SD M SD
Prechtl score 2.13 1 .99 10 2.27
Apgar score ( I min/5min) 8.2419. I 3 1 .04/.
35 7,2518.75 .46/. 46
Parity 1.38 .92 0
Birthweight (Ibs) 7.71 1.04 7.32 .68
Estimated gestational age (wks) 39.88 .35 39.93 1.17
Postnatal age at testing (hrs) 58.41 I 15.94 61.73 18.70

TABLE 111
Maternal pre-delivery medication: drug and time weighting systems

Weighting Drug dose weighting system (d score: d = dose)


factor DruRs arid dosaKe levels
Narcotcs and barbiturates
Meperidine hydrochloride (‘Demerol’), secobarbital (‘Seconal’),
pentobarbital (‘Nembutal’)
1 d 4lOOmg
2 d > lOOmg
Prornethazine hydrochloride (‘Phenergan’)
Promazine hydrochloride (‘Spa rine’)
1 d s 50mg
2 d > 5Omg
Scopolamine hydrobromide (‘Scopolamine’)
1 d G .5mg
2 d > .5mg
1 Other drugs:
Levallorphan tartrate (‘Lorphan’), prochlorperazine (‘Compazine’),
diazepam (‘Valium’), atropine sulfate (‘Atropine’)
Time weighting system (t score: t = time before delivery)
Time of administration before delivery
1 t z 8hrs
2 4hrs s t G 8hrs
3 1 .5hrs G t s 4hrs
4 t s 1.5hrs

adding all the individual d x t scores. The Apparatus


range of total drug scores for the Lpr group The infants were tested in a crib housed
was 0 to 20 and for the HPr group it was withina6ft x 7ft x 1 Ift sound-attenuated
4 to 21. chamber. While noise from a Grason
The mothers of most infants received Stadler Model 901B noise generator, and
saddle anesthesia (five Lpr and four HPT). background noise from the air ventilation
The remainder received local (one), spinal system produced a constant sound in-
(three), general (one) or no anesthesia tensity of 73dB measured at the infant’s
(two). These sample sizes were too small head.
for analysis of the relationship of anes- Respiration was monitored by a Phipps
thesia to the neonatal heart-rate response and Bird infant pneumobelt strapped
to auditory stimulation. around the abdomen. An electrocardiogram
463
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY. 1976, 18

(EKG) was obtained by means of three Data Analysis


Hewlett-Packard electrodes, two placed The values used for this experiment are
across the chest and one on the leg as a the highest instantaneous rate (the shortest
ground. A beat-by-beat measure of heart- interval between beats) and the lowest
rate was obtained using a Narco Bio- instantaneous rate (the longest interval
Systems Biotachometer (Model BT-1200). between beats) in the 10-second periods
These three measures were continuously preceding and following the initiation of
recorded on a Grass Model 5D polygraph. the auditory stimulus. These values will be
The auditory stimulus for this study was referred to as prestimulus-high, pre-
produced by a Hewlett-Packard Model stimulus-low, poststimulus-high and post-
3300A audio oscillator connected to an stimulus-low (Fig. 1).
Electro-voice speaker (Model PA7). From these data, acceleration and de-
celeration scores in beats per min (bpm)
were computed for each stimulus trial for
Procedure each infant. Acceleration scores were
The infants were tested between 10.45 calculated by subtracting the highest
and 11.45 am, between the feedings which heart-rate in the 10-second prestimulus
occurred at about 9.30 and 1.00. Each period from the highest heart-rate in the
infant was brought from the nursery to the 10-second poststimulus period. Decelera-
laboratory by a nurse, who attached EKG tion scores were computed by subtracting
electrodes and the pneumobelt. The infant the lowest heart-rate in the 10-second
was then swaddled and placed on its left poststimulus period from the lowest heart-
side to allow full view of the infant’s face rate in the 10-second prestimulus period.
by the nurse and experimenter. Crying was It is important to note that the acceleration
the only behavioral state which excluded and deceleration scores were computed
a n infant from the experiment : for the most from two different sets of data, hence it
part the infants were in a quiescent state would be possible for both a positive
throughout but could have been awake or acceleration score and a positive decelera-
asleep, with eyes open or closed. tion score to occur on a single trial.
The data were uncorrected for initial
After calibration of the equipment there level effects (Lacey and Lacey 1962, Wilder
was a two-minute baseline recording 1967, Graham and Jackson 1970, Stein-
period, a 10-minute auditory habituation schneider 1971) because there were no
procedure, and a second two-minute base- significant differences between the groups
line period. The total time taken with each in pre-experimental basal heart-rate (two-
infant was approximately 18 minutes. minute sample), nor in their prestimulus-
During the two baseline periods only low and prestimulus-high values (averaged
heart-rate and respiration were recorded. across the first 18 trials). Using the Mann-
The auditory habituation procedure con- Whitney U test (Siege1 1956) with eight
sisted of 18 habituation trials and two dis- infants in each group, the U values were
habituation trials. Each trial consisted of 31, 25 and 26 respectively.
a five-second tone followed by a 25-second
interstimulus interval. The habituation Results
tone was a 700Hz, 85dB square wave Figures 2a and 2b show the group trends
sound. The dishabituation tone was a of acceleration and deceleration scores
300Hz sound of the same dB level and across the 20 stimulus trials. (The accelera-
wave form. tion and deceleration values for the two
464
STEVEN KITTNER LEWIS P. LIPSITT

RESPlRAT ION

c pre-stim lOsec ++post-stirn lOsec+

CARDIOTACHOMETER

80 bprn

Fig. 1. Polygraphic record showing method of recording heart-rate response to sound. Top channel records
respiration, second channel is electrocardiogram and third channel is cardiotachometer transformation of
electrocardiogram inter-beat intervals into momentary (beat by beat) heart-rate. To obtain acceleration
and deceleration scores, the 10-second pre-stimulus period is compared with the 10-second post-stimulus
period. In this example the post-stimulus low heart-rate is 94 beats per minute, compared with a pre-
stimulus low of 100 beats oer minute: thus deceleration score is + 6 . Acceleration score was t 4, based
upon pre- and post-stimultk highs of I12 and 116, respectively.

groups of infants are presented in the same group. However, a significant decrement in
figures for purposes of comparison.) It can deceleration scores was found for both the
be seen that in comparison to the Lpr group LPr group (p < -001) and the H P r group
the HPr group shows consistently larger (p < .02).
acceleration and smaller deceleration Because the HPr group increased in its
scores across the habituation trials. acceleration response from the early to the
In order to characterize these group later trials, while the Lpr group decreased,
differences further, each infant’s accelera- the suggestion of such an interaction was
tion and deceleration response was examined statistically by calculating a
averaged across the first 18 trials. As difference in each infant’s acceleration
expected, these group differences are response from early to later trials. The two
highly significant (Table 1V). distributions of differences were then com-
Table V shows the results of tests for a pared by a Mann-Whitney U-test to
trials effect by comparing the average determine whether these distributions were
heart-rate acceleration and deceleration different for the two groups: they were not.
scores of trials 1 to 5 with those of trials Although there was a significant decre-
14 to 18 for each group. A two-tailed ment across trials for the deceleration
correlated t test showed no significant scores, there was little recovery of the
trend in acceleration scores for either deceleration response to the novel stimulus
D 465
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY. 1976, 18

6r

5 4
n
t 3
0
2 2
oc
w
G ’
V
X O
w
2 -1
0:

-2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9i10
BLOCKS OF TRIALS
5
I -3

-4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
BLOCKS OF TRIALS
Fig. 2. Trends across trials of heart-rate accelera- and High Prechtl (HPr) groups. (6) Right-hand
tion and deceleration to auditory stimuli. (a) Left- graph shows deceleration scores in the same
hand graph shows average acceleration score in manner.
each block of two trials for Low Prechlt (LPr)
on trials 19 and 20 (see Figure 2). acceleration or deceleration. This finding,
Finally, the product moment correla- coupled with the fact that the Apgar scores
tions of heart-rate acceleration and de- were reliably different only at 1 minute,
celeration scores with Prechtl score and suggests that the Apgar rating is not as
other selected variables are shown in Table effective in separating infants at risk as is
VI. Only the first two variables yielded the Prechtl classification scheme, at least
significant correlations. The Prechtl score in essentially normal, surviving babies.
showed the strongest relationship to the
deceleration scores, while maternal parity Discussion
or the number of previous live births had Heart-rate response trends over trials.
the strongest relationship to the accelera- The HPr group was expected to show a
tion scores. It may be noted that the Apgar delayed habituation compared with the
scores did not relate reliably to either Lpr group. The results of this experiment
TABLE IV
Averaged heart-rate acceleration and deceleration scores and comparison of low and high
Prechtl groups
b

Averaged heart-rate response (beats/min)*


Acceleration Deceleration
Prechtl group Prechtl group
Low ~ High ~ Low , High
Mean .81 4.06 I .29 1.68
Standard deviation 2.28 2.08 1.02 1 .I7
Mann-Whitney U test
(two-tailed) u 8, p = .01
=
I u = 5,p = .002
t Test (two-tailed) t = 2.97, p < . 0 2 t = 4 . 1 3 , p < .01
I I
*Averaged across trials 1 to 18.
466
STEVEN KITTNER LEWIS P. LIPSITT

TABLE V
Comparison of trials 1 to 5 with trials 14 to 18 for heart-rate acceleration and deceleration scores

A veraged heart-rate response


(bea/s/min)
t correlated P
Trials 1-5 Trials 14-18
-
Acceleration score
Low Prechtl group - '85 N.S.
High Prechtl group
Deceleration score
1.30
3.60 5.55 1 .998
1.314 N.S.
Low Prechtl group
High Prechtl group
3.75
- .55
- .05
-3.00
i 4.189
2.295
< ,001
< .02

do not clearly support a finding of habitua- tion is supported: the group having a
tion of heart-rate responses in either group. relatively easy birth history showed more
Although Table V does show a significant signs of orienting to auditory stimulation
decrement in the deceleration scores for during the first few days of life. Studies
both groups, there was no significant testing different modalities with different
recovery of the deceleration response on response measures such as a visual fixation
trials 19 and 20 for either group; thus the (Sigman et a/. 1973) would be valuable for
minimal criteria of habituation (Thompson corroborating the significance of these
and Spencer 1966) have not been satisfied. results.
Direction of the heart-rate response. Relationship of heart-rate response to
Although there were no significant differ- obstetric variables. Only Prechtl score and
ences between the two groups across trials, maternal parity showed a significant re-
there were significant differences between lationship to acceleration or deceleration
the two groups for both acceleration and scores (see Table VI). That parity should
deceleration. The Lpr group had smaller have a comparable correlation to the total
acceleration and larger deceleration scores Prechtl score is not surprising, since all the
than the HPr group. The hypothesis that HPr infants were born of primiparous
the Prechtl groups represent populations mothers, while all but one Lpr subject were
having differential receptivity to stimula- born of multiparous mothers. Being a

TABLE VI
Correlation of selected variables with heart-rate response to auditory stimuli for all infants
I
Variable
I
1 Heart-rate response scores
1Acceleration 1
Decelera/ion
Prechtl score I ,480 - .63**
Maternal parity --52* .49
Apgar score
I minute --.I2 .33
2 minute
Age at testing
Maternal pre-delivery medication
-.35
.28 ,
i .03
-.I3

narcotics and barbiturates - .02


all drugs .08
timet

* p i .05, two-tailed test


**p < .01, two-tailed test
?Time between first pre-delivery medication and birth.
467
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY. 1976, 18

primiparous birth counts as a non-optimal infants with a low number from those with
obstetric condition on the Prechtl scale. a high number of non-optimal obstetric
Parity has previously been suggested to conditions would be worth further study,
co-vary both with the anxiety of the mother since such measures could prove valuable
(Copans 1972) and with the use of general as an additional test item in a larger
anesthesia for the mother (Moreau and assessment battery. While it is known that
Birch 1974). Friedman (1975) cites a study obstetric history bears some relation to the
by Gemzell(l954) which reported that the manifestation of neurological abnormal-
level of 17-hydroxycorticosterone is higher ities, this study demonstrates that even in
in infants born of primiparous than of ostensibly normal infants, non-optimal
multiparous mothers. Paradoxically, obstetric factors are responsible in some
Friedman (1975) found that infants born measure for psychobiological functioning
of high-parity mothers required signifi- at birth. The question remains as to
cantly more trials on a visual habituation whether behavioral measures such as
experiment than did infants born to low- heart-rate response to stimulation can
parity mothers. This emphasizes the enhance our ability to identify infants in
importance of using multiple response- jeopardy for later developmental problems.
measures in any attempt to assess newborn This could be extremely important in the
behavior. search for methods of prevention and of
The maternal predelivery medication effective remedial treatment.
variables assessed (see Tables I11 and VI)
showed no significant relationship with Acknowledgements: We are greatly indebted to
Bernice Reilly, R.N.,for her very special expertise
heart-rate acceleration or deceleration in all facets of newborn research, and without
scores. whose conscientious dedication the data for this
study could not have been obtained. The assistance
of Dr. Charles Crook, Dr. Patrick Burke, and
Conclusions Bonnie Zeigler during various phases of this study
is also gratefully acknowledged. We are indebted
While heart-rate response trends over to Prof. Leo Stern, Chairman of the Section of
trials did not discriminate well between Reproductive and Developmental Medicine,
Brown University, for a critical reading of an
groups scoring high or low on Prechtl’s earlier manuscript. Support for the study came
scale of non-optimal maternal, parturition from USPHS Grant No. HD 0391 1 and a research
grant from the Grant Foundation.
and fetal conditions, significant differences This study is a portion of an Honors Thesis
between the ‘high-risk‘ and ‘low-risk‘ conducted by Kittner (1975) under the direction of
the second author.
groups were found for the averaged heart-
rate acceleration and deceleration scores. AUTHORS’ APPOINTMENTS
It is suggested that this difference may Lewis P. Lipsitt, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology
reflect a differential receptivity to stimula- and Medical Science; Director, Child Study Center,
Brown University, Providence, M o d e Island
tion in the two groups. 02912.
The reason for this study was that re- Mr. Steven Kittner is at present a student in the
University of Pennsylvania Medical School,
sponse measures which could differentiate Philadelphia.

SUMMARY
Two groups of clinically normal newborns, differing in the number of non-optimal
factors in their obstetric history, were compared by measuring heart-rate response to a
series of auditory stimuli. There was a significant difference between the groups in the
direction of the average heart-rate response. The ‘high risk’ group showed more heart-rate
acceleration and less deceleration compared with the ‘low-risk‘ group. The heart-rate
responses were significantly related to the number of non-optimal obstetric conditions and
4 65
STEVEN KITTNER LEWIS P. LIPSITT

to parity, but not to the maternal pre-delivery medication score. The greater the ‘risk’ at
birth, the less was the deceleration; the greater the maternal parity, the less did acceleration
occur in response to auditory stimulation. There was no significant difference between the
high-risk and low-risk groups in heart-rate response trends over trials. Both groups showed
reliable diminution of deceleration heart-rate response over trials.

R ~ S U M ~
Histoire obstitricale et rkponse de la friquence cardiaque au son chez le nouveau-ne‘
Deux groupes de nouveaux-nCs cliniquement normaux mais differents par le nombre de
facteurs non optimaux dans leur histoire obstetricale ont CtC compares par la mesure de la
frequence cardiaque a une serie de stimuli auditifs. I1 a it6 note une difference significative
entre les groupes dans le sens de la reponse cardiaque moyenne. Le groupe a ‘haut risque’
a montrt plus d‘accelerations et moins de dectlCrations par comparaison avec le groupe a
‘bas risque’. Les rtponses cardiaques ont ett significativement reliees au nombre de
conditions obstetricales non optimales et a la parite, mais non au score de medication
maternelle avant la naissance. Plus grand est le ‘risque’ a la naissance et moindre est la
deceleration ; plus grande est la parite maternelle, plus faible est l’acceliration en reponse
aux stimulations auditives. I I n’y a pas eu de difference significative entre les groupes a
haut et bas risque da m la reponse cardiaque au cours de la repetition des essais. Les deux
groupes ont montre une diminution reelle de la decCICration dans la reponse de frkquence
cardiaque au cours des essais successifs.

ZUSAM MENFASSUNG
Sch,i.angerschaftsanariinese uncl das Ansprechen der Herzfrequenz auf Geriiusclie beitn
Neugehorenen
Zwei Gruppen klinisch gesunder Neugeborener, die sich durch einige nicht optimale
Faktoren in der Schwangerschaftsanamnese unterschieden, wurden verglichen, indem die
Reaktion der Herzfrequenz auf eine Serie akustischer Stimuli gemessen wurde. Es fie1 eine
signifikante Differenz unter den Gruppen in Bezug auf die Reaktion der Herzfrequenz auf.
Die Reaktionen der Herzfrequenz waren signifikant korreliert zu der Anzahl der nicht
optimalen Geburtshilflichen Bedingungen und zum Geburtsverlauf und nicht zu der
Geburtspramedikation der Mutter. Je groRer das ‘Risiko’ bei Geburt, desto weniger
Pulsbeschleunigung trat als Reaktion auf akustische Stimuli auf. Es fand sich keine
signifikante Differenz zwischen der Gruppe mit ‘hoheni’ und der mit ‘niedrigem Risiko’ in
der Reaktion der Herzfrequenz verglichen mit Kontrollen. Beide Gruppen zeigten
verlal3liche Decelerationsraten der Herzfrequenz gegenuber Kontrollen.

REFERENCES
Aleksandrowicz, M. K . (1974) ‘The effect of pain relieving drugs administered during labor and delivery
on the behavior of the newborn. A review.’ Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 20, 121.
Andre-Thomas, Autgaerden, S. ( 1966) Locomotion from Pre- to Post-Natal Life. Clinics in Developmental
Medicine, No. 24. London: Spastics Society with Heinemann Medical.
Bowes, W. A,. Brackbill, Y., Conway, E., Steinschneider, A. (1970) ‘The effect of obstetric medication on
fetus and infant.’ Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35 (no. 137), 1 .
Brackbill, Y., Kane, J., Manniello, R . L., Abramson, D. ( 1 9 7 4 ~‘Obstetric
) meperidene usage and assess-
ment of neonatal status ’ Anestliesiology. 40, 116.
- - _ _ ( I 9746) ‘Obstetric premedication and infant outcome.’ American Journal of Obstetrics
and Gynecology, 118, 311.
469
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY. 1976, 18

Bronshtein, A. I., Antonova, T. B., Kamenetskaya, A. G., Luppova, N. N., Sytova, V. A. (1958)‘On thq
development of the functions of analyzers in infants and some animals at the early stage of ontogenesis.
In Problemy Evolyutaii Fisiologicheskikh Funktsii (Problems of Evolution of Physiological Functions).
Moscow-Leningrad: Akademiy Nauk SSR. (Washington, D. C. : Office of Technical Services, Report
NO. 60-51066.)
Clifton, R. K. (1974) ‘Heart rate conditioning in the newborn infant.’ Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 18, 9.
- Graham, F. K. (1968) ‘Stability of individual differences in heart rate activity during the newborn
period.’ Psychophysiology, 5, 37.
Copans, S. A. (1972) ‘Human prenatal effects: Methodological problems and some suggested solutions.’
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 20, 43.
Eisenberg, R. B., Coursin, D. B., Rupp, N. R. (1966)‘Habituation to an acoustical pattern as an index of
differences among human neonates.’ Journal of Auditory Research, 6,239.
Friedman, S. (1975)‘Infant habituation: processes, problems and possib es.’ I n Ellis, N. R. (Ed.) Aberranr
Development in Infancy: Human and Animal Studies. New York: Halstead Press. p. 217.
Gemzell, C. A. (1954) ‘Variations in plasma levels of 17-hydroxycorticosteroidsin mother and infant
following parturition.’ Acta Endocrinologica, 17, 100.
Cluck, L. (1974)‘Perinatology: state of the art.’ Contemporary Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 125.
Graham, F. K., Clifton, R. K. (1966) ‘Heart-rate change as a component of the orienting response.’
Psychological Bulletin, 65,305.
- Jackson, J. C. (1970)‘Arousal systems and infant heart rate responses.’ Advances in Child Developmenr,
5 , 60.
Hammond, J. (1970)‘Hearing and response in the newborn.’ Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology,
12, 3.
Jacklin. C. N. (1972)‘The pattern of cardiac response to olfactory stimuli in neonates.’ Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Brown University.
Kearsley, R. B. (1973)‘The newborn response to auditory stimulation: A demonstration of orienting and
defensive behavior.’ Child Development, 44,582.
Kittner, S. (1975)‘Obstetric history and newborn behavior.’ Honors Thesis, Brown University.
Kron, R. E., Stein, M., Goddard, K. E. (1966)‘Newborn sucking behavior affected by obstetric sedation.’
Pediatrics. 37, 1012.
- Ibsen, J., Goddard, K. E. (1968) ‘Consistent individual differences in the nutritive sucking behavior
of the human newborn.’ Psychosomatic Medicine, 30, 151.
Lacey, J. I. (1959)In Rubenstein, E.A., Parloff, M. B. (Eds.) Research in Psychotherapy. Washington, D.C.:
American Psychological Association.
- Lacey, B. C. (1962) ‘The law of initial value in the longitudinal study of autonomic constitution:
Reproducibility of autonomic responses and response patterns over a four-year interval.’ Annals of the
New York Academy of Sciences, 98, 1257.
Moreau, T., Birch, H. G. (1974)‘Relationship between obstetrical general anesthesia and rate of neonatal
habituation to repeated stimulation.’ Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 16,612.
Parmelee, A. H., Sigman, M., Kopp, C. B., Haber, A. (1974)‘Diagnosis of the infant at high risk for mental,
motor, or sensory handicap.’ Paper presented at the Conference on Early Intervention for High Risk
Infants and Young Children, Chapel Hill, N.C.
Porges, S . W. (1974)‘Heart rate indices of newborn attentional responsivity.’ Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 20,
231.
Prechtl, H.F. R. (1968)‘Neurological findings in newborn infants after pre- and paranatal complications.’
In Jonix, J. H. P., Visser, H. K. A. Troelstra, J. A. (Eds.) Aspects of Prematurity and Dysmaturity.
Leiden : Stenfert Kroese.
Schulman, C. A. ( I 970) ‘Heart rate response habituation in high-risk premature infants.’ Psychophysiology,
6. 690.
Siege], S. (1956)Nonparametric Statisics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sigman, M., Kopp, C. B., Parmelee, A. H., Jeffrey, W. E. (1973)‘Visual attention and neurological organiza-
tion in neonates.’ Child Development, 44,461.
Sokolov, E. W. (1963) ‘Higher nervous functions: the orienting reflex.’ Annual Review of Physiology, 25,
545.
Standley, K., Soule, A. B., Copans, S. A., Duchowny, M. S. (1974)‘Local-regional anesthesia during child-
birth: Effect on newborn behaviors.’ Science, 186, 634.
Stechler, G. (1964) ‘Newborn attention as affected by medication during labor.’ Science, 144, 315.
Steinschneider, A. (1971)‘Determinants of an infant’s cardic response to stimulation.’ I n Walcher, D. N.,
Peters, D. L. (Eds.) Development of SelfRegulatory Mechanisms. New York: Academic Press.
Thompson, R. F., Spencer, W. A. (1966)‘Habituation: A model phenomenon for the study of neuronal
substrates of behavior.’ Psychological Review, 73, 16.
Wilder, J. (1967)Stimulus and Response: The Law of Initial Value. Bristol: John Wright.

470

You might also like