sustainability
Article
Integrating Climate Change Risks and Sustainability Goals into
Saudi Arabia’s Financial Regulation: Pathways to Green Finance
Mohammad Omar Alhejaili
Citation: Alhejaili, M.O. Integrating
Climate Change Risks and
Sustainability Goals into Saudi
Arabia’s Financial Regulation:
Pathways to Green Finance.
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104159
Academic Editors: Roberto
Cervelló-Royo, Javier Oliver-
Muncharaz, Inmaculada Marqués
Pérez and Inmaculada Guaita
Received: 13 April 2024
Revised: 12 May 2024
Accepted: 15 May 2024
Published: 16 May 2024
Copyright: © 2024 by the author.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104159
Law School, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia; malhejaili@ut.edu.sa
Abstract: This study examines the integration of climate change risks and sustainability goals within
Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework to enhance green finance initiatives aligned with
Vision 2030. A qualitative research design synthesises insights from a comprehensive literature review,
semi-structured interviews with domain experts, and a detailed analysis of critical Saudi green finance
frameworks and legislation. This research identifies mechanisms for embedding sustainability in
the financial sector and addresses the challenges, opportunities, and strategic directions essential for
Saudi Arabia within the global context of sustainable finance. The findings reveal a robust foundation
laid by Vision 2030 initiatives yet underscore the need for enhanced regulatory frameworks, increased
market readiness, and greater societal engagement. This study highlights a significant literature gap
in understanding Saudi Arabia’s unique approach to green finance amid its economic diversification
and sustainability goals. Contributing to original insights, this research underscores the critical
role of Saudi Arabia in the global energy market and its substantial economic and environmental
transformations. It offers detailed analyses and recommendations that enrich the discourse on
sustainable finance, impacting policymakers, financial practitioners, and scholars.
Keywords: sustainable finance; green finance; climate change; financial regulation; Saudi Arabia;
Vision 2030
1. Introduction
This investigation rigorously explores the integration of climate change risks and
sustainability objectives within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory frameworks, with a
particular emphasis on green finance under the ambit of Vision 2030. This study is struc-
tured around a central research question: How can incorporating green finance principles
within Saudi Arabian financial regulations enhance the realisation of Vision 2030 and
contribute to broader global sustainability efforts? This question is of paramount impor-
tance, as it not only addresses Saudi Arabia’s current needs but also has implications for
global sustainability.
The objectives of this research are manifold. Firstly, it aims to conduct a detailed exam-
ination of the evolution of green finance globally, focusing on Saudi Arabia, considering the
region’s unique socio-economic and environmental dynamics. Secondly, it seeks to analyse
the existing policy and regulatory frameworks that underpin green finance in Saudi Arabia,
assessing their coherence with international standards and their efficacy in promoting
sustainable economic practices. Thirdly, this research evaluates the operational challenges
and opportunities that characterise Saudi Arabia’s trajectory towards sustainable finance,
intending to identify and propose solutions to overcome these hurdles.
This study identifies a significant gap in the existing research. At the same time,
there is a rich body of global literature on sustainable finance. However, there needs
to be more focused academic explorations into the specific modalities through which
Saudi Arabia aligns with green finance principles. This research endeavour is designed to
bridge this gap by providing a nuanced analysis that enhances the academic discourse on
sustainable finance. It offers a granular look at the impediments and advancements within
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 2 of 18

Saudi Arabia’s green finance sector. It provides actionable insights that could guide policy
formulation and financial practices within the Saudi and similar economies. This unique
contribution fills a crucial void in the academic understanding of sustainable finance in
Saudi Arabia.
Adopting a qualitative research methodology, this study engages in an exhaustive
literature review to encapsulate the current understanding and debates within the field of
green finance. It is supplemented by semi-structured interviews with key experts across rel-
evant sectors—including financial regulation, sustainable development, and environmental
policy—to garner diverse perspectives on integrating sustainability goals into financial
practices. A meticulous examination of Saudi Arabia’s green finance frameworks and
legislation further underpins this research, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the
operational realities and strategic directions in Saudi Arabian green finance.
This study enriches the discourse on sustainable finance through a detailed and critical
examination. It sheds light on the intricacies of embedding sustainability and climate
change mitigation strategies within the financial sector. The research informs future policy
and financial practices by delving deep into Saudi Arabia’s strategic endeavours in green
finance. It acts as a catalyst for further scholarly investigation in the expansive field of
sustainable finance. This contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how financial
systems can be leveraged to achieve sustainability goals, serving as a blueprint for similar
initiatives globally.

2. Literature Review
The imperative for integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into
financial systems is gaining traction, underscored by the United Nations’ Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs). These goals advocate for a holistic approach to sustainable
development that harmonises economic growth with environmental preservation and
social equity [1]. Central to this integration is green finance, which channels financial
instruments, policies, and markets toward environmental sustainability and inclusive
economic growth [2]. The ‘PIF Green Finance Framework’ exemplifies Saudi Arabia’s
commitment to these principles by outlining specific financial instruments and policies to
promote environmental sustainability. This framework aligns Saudi’s economic strategies
with global sustainability targets, contributing to a broader international effort to mitigate
climate change and promote social equity [3].
Tracing the origins of green finance reveals its roots in the ‘Blueprint for a Green
Economy’, initiated by the UK Government in 1989. This pivotal document marked a signif-
icant step toward embedding environmental considerations within economic and financial
planning [4]. The evolution continued with the United Nations Environment Programme’s
(UNEP) Green Economy Initiative in 2008, highlighting the importance of green sector
investments as a foundation for sustainable development. The global commitment was
further solidified at the Rio+20 Conference in 2012, which recognised green finance as a
strategic tool for sustainable development [5]. These milestones underscore the progressive
integration of environmental goals into financial systems, setting a precedent that has
influenced numerous national policies, including those of Saudi Arabia. As detailed in the
‘Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Green Financing Framework’, Saudi Arabia’s strategies reflect a
local adaptation of these global initiatives, implementing them within its unique economic
and environmental context [6].
The academic exploration of green finance, predominantly qualitative, has focused
on developing frameworks, tools, and approaches to embed sustainability within the fi-
nancial sector [7–10]. This exploration is crucial for fostering green technologies and skills,
recognised as key enablers in transitioning to a green economy [11]. Studies emphasise the
necessity of integrating these technologies across production and consumption processes to
enhance sustainable economic growth [12]. For instance, the ‘DNV Second Party Opinion’
evaluates Saudi Arabia’s application of green finance principles, noting both advances
and areas for improvement [13]. This document illustrates how Saudi Arabia is imple-
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 3 of 18

menting frameworks that align with global standards and contribute to the advancement
of green finance, reflecting a practical application of academic insights within a specific
national context.
The linkage between green finance, the circular economy, and bioeconomy models
is critical for addressing sustainability challenges, particularly in recovery and resilience-
building post-COVID-19. This underscores the need for an integrated research and pol-
icymaking approach that promotes sustainability across all financial sectors [14]. The
‘Second Party Opinion Government of Saudi Arabia—March 2024’ offers insights into
specific challenges and strategies Saudi Arabia employs in its economic strategy post-
COVID-19 [15]. This document reveals efforts to integrate sustainable practices into the
core of financial policies, aiming to foster resilience and sustainable development within
the financial sector [16].
Realising green finance within existing economic structures presents numerous chal-
lenges, including the need for long-term policies, funding gaps for innovation, and institu-
tional weaknesses, as identified through SWOT analysis by various scholars [17]. These
challenges highlight the nuanced difficulties in advancing green finance and the critical role
of strategic financial regulation. The ‘PIF Green Finance Framework’ outlines how Saudi
Arabia addresses these gaps through comprehensive policies that promote sustainable
financial practices. By enhancing institutional frameworks and increasing funding for
green projects, Saudi Arabia aims to mitigate these barriers and strengthen the foundation
of its financial sector for sustainable growth [3].
Building on the foundational understanding of green finance within the context of
financial regulation and sustainability goals, this section delves into quantitative assess-
ments of countries’ performances in transitioning towards a green economy and achieving
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Various indices and frameworks provide critical
insights into the complex interplay between financial systems, environmental sustainability,
and economic development strategies. The SDG indicators, launched in 2015, serve as a
pivotal tool for evaluating countries’ progress toward these goals. The Sustainable Develop-
ment Report 2022 [18] highlights a notable decline in the average SDG indicators, primarily
due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, underscoring the urgent need for countries
to align their economic recovery efforts with sustainable development practices [19].
In regions like Latin America, integrating the QHIM with 20 indicators related to the
SDGs has underscored the importance of systemic harmony to support effective decision-
making processes [20]. Conversely, the European green economy’s positive impact on
sustainable development hosted to energy efficiency, resource productivity, and social
inclusion has led to a slowdown in greening processes [21]. This contrast in Union, while
confirmed, highlights the reality of challenges and approaches across different regions,
underlining the necessity of tailored strategies to address specific environmental, economic,
and social dynamics.
Shifting the focus to the Middle East, particularly Saudi Arabia, provides a critical
regional perspective on integrating green finance and sustainable development. Utilising
the EEPSE Green Economy Index, which incorporates educational, economic, political,
societal, and environmental indicators in line with the Quintuple Helix Innovation Model, a
recent study highlights significant strides and challenges in Saudi Arabia’s green economy
from 2015 to 2020 [22]. This analysis underscores the impacts of global challenges like the
COVID-19 crisis on Saudi’s sustainability efforts and highlights the importance of resilient
and adaptive frameworks.
Further analysis from the region, including studies by AlArjani et al. (2021) and
Alwakid et al. (2020) [23,24], indicates that only 57% of the examined sustainability goals
have been achieved, pointing to significant opportunities for improvement. These findings
underscore the need for a multidimensional approach that integrates economic activities
with environmental sustainability and social equity, particularly focusing on enhancing
efforts in renewable energy sources and green entrepreneurial activities.
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 4 of 18

A critical gap emerges from the synthesis of empirical findings and theoretical dis-
cussions throughout this review: the need for concentrated research on the interactions
between green finance, sustainable development, and the implementation of the Sustain-
able Development Goals (SDGs) within the unique socio-economic and environmental
frameworks of Saudi Arabia. Developing a new evaluative framework that thoroughly con-
siders the interplay among the social, economic, and ecological dimensions of sustainable
development is essential. This framework should primarily focus on advancing the green
economy and broadening sustainable development practices within the region [25,26].
This comprehensive review of the global shift towards green growth and the in-depth
analysis of the efforts and specific challenges of regulations prepare the groundwork for
an innovative evaluation to determine the sustainability of development and the scope of
green initiatives in Saudi Arabia. By critically assessing these strategies and identifying
research voids, this review sets the stage for future scholarly and policymaking endeavours
to integrate green finance effectively into financial regulatory frameworks, thus forging
pathways to achieve sustainability goals and mitigate climate change impacts.

3. Methodology
This study employs a comprehensive qualitative research design, leveraging a triangu-
lation method to deeply examine the integration of climate change risks and sustainability
goals within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory frameworks, explicitly focusing on Vision
2030 initiatives. Integrating an extensive literature review, semi-structured expert inter-
views, and a detailed analysis of crucial Saudi green finance frameworks and legislation
enhances the reliability and depth of the findings through diverse data sources [27].
The methodology is grounded in a systematic and exhaustive literature review that
traces green finance’s historical evolution and current trajectory globally and within the
Saudi context. This literature review critically assesses the role of green finance in promoting
sustainable economic growth. It is contextualised against the United Nations’ Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs), underscoring the global relevance and impact of this study.
It explores the significant theoretical frameworks and empirical research highlighting the
necessity of embedding sustainable practices and climate mitigation efforts within financial
systems. This comprehensive examination frames this study within the current academic
discourse and identifies gaps and potential areas for policy intervention in Saudi Arabia’s
financial regulation strategies [4].
Building on this foundation, this literature review methodically synthesises empirical
studies and theoretical insights to establish a conceptual framework for the research hy-
potheses. This framework assesses the efficacy of integrating green finance principles into
Saudi financial regulations and the potential impacts on sustainable development [28].
The research methodology includes conducting semi-structured interviews with a
purposively selected group of 15 experts, chosen for their extensive experience and pivotal
roles across various sectors pertinent to green finance. These interviews are not just
theoretical discussions but are designed to gather in-depth insights into the practical
integration of sustainability within the Saudi green finance sector, thereby demonstrating
the real-world application and value of the research.
Additionally, this study involves a thorough analysis of Saudi Arabia’s green finance
frameworks and related legislative measures. This analysis critically examines how these
frameworks align with international sustainability standards and evaluates their potential
to foster effective green finance practices within the Saudi financial sector.
Together, these methodological components—rooted in a solid literature review, en-
riched by expert opinions, and supported by legislative analysis—offer a holistic and
systematic exploration of the challenges and opportunities associated with integrating
climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory frame-
work. This integrated approach contributes significantly to the academic domain of green
finance and provides actionable insights for policymakers, financial practitioners, and
stakeholders both within the kingdom and globally.
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 5 of 18

3.1. Expert Interviews

Conducting semi-structured interviews was a critical component of the research
methodology, aiming to gather comprehensive insights into the integration of sustainability
in Saudi Arabia’s green finance sector. This study engaged 15 experts selected for their
extensive experience and pivotal roles across financial regulation, sustainable development,
environmental policy, and green technology [29].
Experts were chosen through purposive sampling, based on criteria that included a
minimum of ten years of experience and significant contributions to sustainability initiatives
within Saudi Arabia [30]. This method ensured a broad representation of views from
various sectors essential to green finance, facilitating a deep dive into expert knowledge
and practices.
Interviews were conducted face-to-face and virtually, depending on the participants’
availability, with each session lasting approximately 60 min. This format allowed for a
thorough exploration of the experts’ views, ensuring the comprehensiveness of our research.
The semi-structured nature of the interviews allowed for probing into specific areas of
interest while allowing the conversation to evolve organically based on expert responses.
The interview guide included vital questions crucial to uncovering insights into the
current landscape and future directions of green finance in Saudi Arabia. These questions
focused on describing the current regulatory framework, identifying primary challenges
in aligning Saudi’s financial practices with global sustainability objectives, and exploring
anticipated developments in green finance under Vision 2030, ensuring the relevance and
significance of our research.

3.2. Analysis of Saudi Green Finance Frameworks and Laws

A critical examination of Saudi Arabia’s green finance frameworks and related leg-
islative measures constitutes a fundamental component of this methodology. This detailed
analysis assesses how these frameworks align with international sustainability standards
and evaluates their potential to foster effective green finance practices within the Saudi
financial sector. Documents such as the Public Investment Fund’s (PIF) Green Finance
Framework are scrutinised to assess their comprehensiveness, efficacy, and improvement
areas, offering a critical lens on the regulatory landscape [31].

3.3. Data Analysis

The qualitative data gathered from the literature review, expert interviews, and legisla-
tive document analysis are processed through thematic analysis. This method is selected for
its effectiveness in extracting and interpreting patterns within qualitative data. It facilitates
a nuanced exploration of the interrelations between regulatory frameworks, market prac-
tices, and societal trends influencing green finance [32]. The analytical process is iterative,
involving meticulous coding, initial theme generation, and subsequent refinement to ensure
an accurate and faithful representation of the underlying data.
By employing this rigorous and comprehensive methodological framework, this study
aims to provide a holistic and systematic exploration of the challenges and opportunities
associated with integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s
financial regulatory framework. Integrating insights from scholarly literature, expert
perspectives, and legislative analysis contributes significantly to the academic domain
of green finance. It provides actionable recommendations for policymakers, financial
practitioners, and stakeholders both within the kingdom and globally.

4. Results
Given the complexity and nuance of integrating climate change risks and sustainability
goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation, this qualitative study has provided significant
insights through thematic analysis. This section presents the emergent themes from the
interviews and document analysis, delineating the current landscape, challenges, strategies
for integration, and future directions of green finance in Saudi Arabia. Each theme is
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 6 of 18

explored in detail, referencing existing literature to provide a comprehensive overview of

the field and to suggest avenues for future research and policy formulation.

4.1. Emergent Themes

4.1.1. Current Landscape of Green Finance in Saudi Arabia
Within the evolving landscape of green finance in Saudi Arabia, a critical examination
reveals a dynamic interplay between ambitious national strategies and the practical realities
of their implementation and integration. This contrast is vividly illustrated by the reflections
of a key informant who notes, “Saudi Arabia is ardently pursuing green finance as part of
its Vision 2030, aiming to cement sustainability into the fabric of its financial sector” (expert).
This statement highlights the country’s commitment and acknowledges the nascent stage
of this integration within the broader financial landscape, prompting a deeper inquiry into
how these ambitions translate into actionable frameworks and measurable outcomes [33].
The juxtaposition of Saudi Arabia’s strategic intentions against global best practices
necessitates a thorough examination. The literature underscores the importance of establish-
ing clear visions and implementing concrete policies that operationalise sustainability goals
within financial regulations [34,35]. Reflecting on the expert’s observations, it becomes
essential to analyse how Saudi Arabia’s regulatory environment, investment practices, and
financial products align with these global standards, identifying potential gaps and areas
for enhancement.
Moreover, the expert’s mention of Saudi Arabia’s “ardent pursuit” triggers a discus-
sion on the effectiveness of current green finance initiatives and the mechanisms of policy
translation. Research indicates that transitioning to sustainable finance requires top-down
policy directives and a bottom-up cultural shift within financial institutions towards sus-
tainability [36,37]. This insight raises critical questions about the internalisation of green
finance principles among Saudi financial entities and their reflection in operational and
investment decisions.
Additionally, the expert’s insights underline the significant role of green finance in sup-
porting Saudi Arabia’s broader economic diversification efforts as outlined in Vision 2030.
This strategic alignment between financial sustainability and economic diversification is a
recurring theme in sustainable finance literature, which advocates for integrating environ-
mental and social governance (ESG) criteria to achieve long-term economic resilience and
growth [38]. Therefore, this discussion is a foundation for examining the interdependencies
between green finance and economic diversification strategies in Saudi Arabia.
By integrating insights from experts with existing academic literature, this analysis
elucidates the complex and ambitious terrain of green finance within Saudi Arabia. Through
a critical lens, the dialogue initiated by experts helps to uncover the multifaceted hurdles
that challenge the integration of sustainability within the financial sector. These challenges
span from aligning regulatory frameworks and effecting cultural transformations to the
practical implementation of strategic national objectives. Such an in-depth exploration,
recognising the progress made to date, underscores the ongoing need for both scholarly
inquiry and pragmatic action aimed at enhancing and actualising green finance initiatives
tailored to the unique socio-economic and environmental context of Saudi Arabia.

4.1.2. Challenges in Integrating Sustainability into Financial Regulation

The challenges of embedding sustainability within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory
framework are profoundly nuanced and multifaceted. As highlighted by an expert, “One
of the main challenges is the lack of standardised metrics and frameworks for evaluating
the environmental impact of investments” (expert). This observation underscores a signif-
icant barrier that impedes the operationalisation of green finance initiatives and mirrors
a widespread challenge within the global sustainability domain. The absence of uniform
metrics and frameworks complicates the assessment and comparison of the sustainability
impacts of financial activities, reflecting concerns about the need for harmonised global
standards in green finance as discussed in the literature [39].
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 7 of 18

Further complicating the landscape, another expert points out the difficulty in “nav-
igating the complex regulatory landscape, which involves multiple stakeholders with
varying priorities and degrees of commitment to sustainability goals” (expert). This com-
ment encapsulates the intricate dynamics within regulatory environments, where diverging
stakeholder interests can lead to fragmented approaches to sustainability. This fragmenta-
tion is recognised in scholarly work as a significant obstacle to the cohesive integration of
sustainability goals into financial regulations, underscoring the urgent need for a unified
regulatory vision that aligns with global sustainability benchmarks [40,41].
Additionally, the challenge of “aligning short-term financial objectives with long-term
sustainability outcomes” is another tension identified by an expert. This dichotomy between
immediate profitability and enduring environmental stewardship is a well-documented
theme in financial discourse, sparking debates over perceived trade-offs and advocating
for a paradigm shift that recognises the long-term value creation of sustainable finance
practices [42–44].
These expert insights prompt a deeper reflection on the necessary structural, cultural,
and policy-related shifts to cultivate a supportive environment for green finance in Saudi
Arabia. Developing standardised metrics, establishing cohesive regulatory frameworks,
and transforming the sector’s valuation systems prioritise sustainability as a core compo-
nent of financial decision-making [45,46]. These shifts are essential for operationalising the
sustainability objectives of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 within its financial sector, indicating
a complex interplay between regulatory adaptation, stakeholder engagement, and cultural
evolution toward sustainability.
Through expert insights and academic analysis, this exploration of sustainability in-
tegration into financial regulations reveals Saudi Arabia’s specific hurdles in aligning its
financial sector with broader sustainable development objectives. Positioned within the
larger global context of transitioning towards sustainable finance, this analysis underscores
the critical need for continuous academic research and dialogue. Such scholarly engage-
ment is vital to effectively navigate the complexities of harmonising financial practices
with sustainability goals, highlighting the dynamic interplay between practical challenges
and theoretical considerations in advancing sustainable finance. This ongoing inquiry not
only deepens the understanding of these issues but also contributes to developing action-
able strategies that can drive the effective integration of sustainability into the financial
regulatory frameworks.

4.1.3. Strategies for Integration

In the intricate realm of Saudi Arabia’s green finance, the strategic integration of
sustainability and climate change considerations into financial regulations emerges as a
pivotal area of concentration. An expert’s observation illuminates a crucial direction for
advancement: “By formulating precise, standardised metrics and providing incentives for
sustainable investments, we can expedite the adoption of green finance practices” (expert).
This viewpoint underscores the significance of establishing measurable and universally
recognised metrics to evaluate the sustainability impacts of financial activities, echoing the
academic consensus on the indispensability of such measures [11,39,47].
The suggestion of “offering incentives for sustainable investments” highlights the
potential for policy mechanisms to influence market behaviours positively. Scholarly dis-
cussions support this strategy, advocating using regulatory incentives, such as tax benefits,
subsidies, or differentiated capital requirements, to direct capital towards environmentally
sustainable projects [41,48]. The analysis delves into the effectiveness of such incentives
within the Saudi context, exploring how well they balance incentivisation with the genuine
motivation of financial institutions toward sustainability.
Furthermore, the expert articulates a significant challenge in “bridging the gap be-
tween environmental advocacy and financial industry practices” (expert), encapsulating
a wide-ranging systemic issue. This assertion resonates with the academic discourse ad-
vocating for an integrative approach encompassing financial and regulatory changes and
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 8 of 18

cultural and educational shifts within the industry towards sustainability [49,50]. It beck-
ons a critical examination of the current collaborations and partnerships between NGOs,
government bodies, and financial institutions, evaluating their effectiveness in fostering a
collective commitment to green finance.
This discussion on integration strategies necessitates the consideration of how policy
frameworks, incentive structures, and collaborative efforts can be optimised. The analysis
further explores the interdependencies between regulatory clarity, market readiness, and
stakeholder engagement in advancing the green finance agenda within Saudi Arabia.
The discourse reveals the complex dynamics in operationalising sustainability within
financial regulations by juxtaposing expert perspectives with academic insights. It high-
lights the necessity for a comprehensive strategy that connects policy, practice, and cultural
shifts. Through this analytical lens, the expert’s comments provide a foundation for deeper
investigations into the approach that can catalyse the transition towards a sustainable
financial ecosystem in Saudi Arabia. This ongoing dialogue aligns with global discussions
on sustainable finance and emphasises the need for innovative and adaptive solutions to
embed sustainability deeply within the financial sector’s framework.

4.1.4. Future Directions and Vision 2030

The intersection of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 with the domain of green finance encap-
sulates a forward-looking ambition deeply rooted in sustainability and economic diversifi-
cation. This ambitious alignment is articulated by an expert who notes, “As more people
seek to align their investments with their values, we anticipate a significant shift towards
sustainability in the financial sector” (expert). This statement underscores the growing
societal demand for ethical investment options and highlights the transformative potential
of green finance as a vehicle for realising Vision 2030’s sustainability objectives [33].
The anticipated “significant shift” reflects a broader, globally observed trend where
personal values increasingly influence investment strategies, heralding a new era of finance
that prioritises Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria. This observation
aligns with scholarly discussions emphasising the role of consumer and investor preferences
in steering the financial sector towards sustainability [50]. The analysis delves into how
Saudi Arabia’s financial regulations and market practices are evolving to accommodate and
catalyse this transition, juxtaposing the current state with the projected trajectory under
Vision 2030.
Additionally, the expert highlights the critical role of technological innovations and
fintech in bridging the gap between sustainability aspirations and investment realities.
“Innovations in fintech and blockchain offer new ways to track and verify the environ-
mental impact of investments, making it easier for investors to make informed decisions”,
says the expert. This insight aligns with academic discourse that positions technological
advancements as crucial in enhancing the transparency, accessibility, and efficiency of
green finance [51]. It also prompts a critical examination of the readiness of Saudi Arabia’s
financial infrastructure to integrate and leverage such disruptive technologies, considering
the regulatory, technical, and cultural challenges involved.
As framed by Vision 2030 and reflected in the expert’s insights, the discussion about
the future of green finance in Saudi Arabia involves the dynamic interplay between societal
values, technological innovation, and regulatory frameworks. This discourse invites a
deeper inquiry into how the sustainability goals of Vision 2030 are operationalised within
the financial sector, examining the mechanisms through which green finance is being
mainstreamed into investment practices and the broader economic landscape.
Integrating expert prognostications with in-depth scholarly research, this analysis
unveils a complex spectrum of challenges and opportunities inherent in advancing green
finance within Saudi Arabia. It contributes to academic discourse and practical applica-
tions concerning implementing sustainability principles in financial infrastructures. This
discussion underscores the need for supportive and adaptive policy frameworks, market
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 9 of 18

preparedness to embrace sustainable practices, and active societal involvement in creating

an environment conducive to green finance.
By delving into these aspects through expert insights, this research positions Saudi
Arabia’s Vision 2030 as a pivotal element in the global dialogue on sustainable finance. This
strategic vision highlights Saudi Arabia’s potential to catalyse transformative shifts within
the financial domain and emphasises its alignment with evolving global narratives on sus-
tainability. This nuanced exploration delineates Saudi Arabia’s strategic pathways towards
embedding green finance at the core of its financial system, showcasing its alignment with
and contributions to emerging global sustainability paradigms.

5. Discussion
This research meticulously combines findings from a literature review, expert inter-
views, and an examination of Saudi Arabia’s green finance laws and initiatives. This
comprehensive synthesis aligns with and enhances the academic discourse on sustain-
able finance, offering a detailed understanding of Saudi Arabia’s distinctive context. By
incorporating expert insights and a thorough analysis of Saudi laws and initiatives, this
study illuminates potential strategies for integrating climate change risks and sustainability
goals into Saudi’s financial regulation, thereby enriching the global body of knowledge on
green finance.

5.1. Integration of Climate Change Risks and Sustainability Goals

Integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s finan-
cial regulatory framework is critical to the nation’s Vision 2030. This strategic integration
leverages comprehensive green finance frameworks and initiatives, reflecting a com-
mitment to align with global sustainability trends while addressing unique national
development challenges.
Bridging Global Standards and Local Implementation: Saudi Arabia’s concerted
efforts to align its green finance frameworks with international standards, such as those
stipulated by the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) and the Loan Market
Association (LMA), reflect a deep commitment to global best practices in sustainable finance.
The alignment with these standards is not merely a procedural adherence but a strategic
engagement to enhance transparency, comparability, and confidence among international
investors and stakeholders. As pointed out in the literature, this strategic alignment is
critical for building a robust framework that supports transparency and investor confidence,
essential elements for attracting global investments [50]. The Public Investment Fund’s
(PIF) Green Finance Framework illustrates Saudi Arabia’s endeavours to integrate into the
global green finance landscape and tailor these practices to meet its unique environmental
and economic needs. An expert’s observation underscores this strategy: “Aligning with
global standards is not just about attracting investments; it is about fostering a sustainable
economic future”, highlighting the strategic importance of such standardisation for broader
sustainability goals.
Addressing the Circular Carbon Economy Model: Adopting the Circular Carbon Econ-
omy (CCE) model, endorsed by the G20, is particularly noteworthy. This model promotes
a holistic approach to climate change mitigation, incorporating reduction, reuse, recycling,
and carbon removal principles. This approach aligns with the emerging academic dis-
course that advocates for adaptable and holistic frameworks in addressing climate change
challenges [52]. By integrating the CCE model within its green finance frameworks, Saudi
Arabia adheres to innovative global sustainability paradigms and paves new pathways for
sustainable growth. This approach reflects a pioneering strategy in transitioning towards a
green economy, situating the kingdom at the forefront of ecological innovation.
Transparency, Reporting, and Market Development: The emphasis on transparency
and market development through stringent project evaluation, selection, and reporting
mechanisms is another cornerstone of Saudi Arabia’s strategy to mature its green finance
market. These mechanisms are vital for mitigating risks associated with climate change
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 10 of 18

and sustainability investments, as transparency plays a pivotal role in risk management

strategies in financial markets [41]. Saudi initiatives, such as the detailed evaluations in
the ‘DNV Second Party Opinion’ and the frameworks outlined in the ‘PIF Green Finance
Framework’, serve as benchmarks and templates that other nations could emulate as they
embark on similar sustainability journeys [8].
Collaborative Efforts and ESG Integration: Saudi Arabia’s engagement in international
sustainability efforts, like the One Planet Sovereign Wealth Funds initiative, highlights
its commitment to global collaboration in green finance. This international collaboration
is crucial for advancing collective global sustainability goals, a sentiment echoed across
academic discussions [51]. Additionally, Saudi Arabia’s comprehensive strategy towards
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria integration exemplifies a proac-
tive approach to embedding sustainability deeply within economic diversification and
financial practices. This integration indicates a broader, more inclusive understanding of
sustainability that transcends environmental considerations to include significant social
and governance dimensions [53].
In integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into its financial regulatory
framework, Saudi Arabia is crafting a detailed, ambitious strategy that aligns with inter-
national standards and innovatively addresses unique national challenges. This strategic
orientation continuously shapes the financial sector’s trajectory towards sustainable growth,
adhering to a nuanced, multifaceted approach incorporating cutting-edge technological
advancements, robust policy frameworks, and active global collaboration.

5.2. Addressing Standardisation and Regulatory Harmonisation

The endeavour to standardise metrics and frameworks for green finance is critical for
accurately assessing the environmental impacts of investments. It marks a foundational
challenge in integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals within Saudi Arabia’s
financial regulatory framework. What sets Saudi Arabia apart is its unique approach
to this push towards standardisation, clearly outlined in its green finance frameworks
and consistently echoed by industry experts. This distinct approach aligns with broader
scholarly discussions in sustainable finance, emphasising its pivotal role in global finance.
Standardisation and Regulatory Harmonisation: Saudi Arabia’s commitment to align-
ing with international standards, such as those established by the International Capital
Market Association (ICMA) and the Loan Market Association (LMA), underscores a strate-
gic commitment to standardisation. This commitment transcends mere regulatory com-
pliance, which is critical to fostering a transparent, credible, and efficient green finance
market. Scholars like Scholtens (2017) [41] stress the importance of standard metrics for en-
vironmental impact assessments within green finance, essential for ensuring comparability
and reliability across international borders. An expert elaborates on this alignment: “The
adoption of international green bond principles by Saudi financial institutions marks a
significant milestone in marrying global standards with local practices, thereby enhancing
Saudi’s credibility in green finance”. This alignment facilitates Saudi Arabia’s integra-
tion into the global green finance ecosystem and replicates the model for other nations
undergoing similar transitions.
The Circular Carbon Economy (CCE) Model: Saudi Arabia’s innovative adoption of
the CCE model, endorsed by the G20, is a testament to its forward-thinking approach to
standardisation and sustainability. This model’s focus on reducing, reusing, recycling, and
removing carbon offers a comprehensive strategy for climate change mitigation. Integrating
the CCE model into Saudi’s financial strategies enhances the kingdom’s contributions to
sustainable finance discourse and positions it as a pioneer in conceptualising and opera-
tionalising green finance through a focused, carbon-centric lens.
Transparency and Market Development: The emphasis on transparency through
rigorous project evaluation and reporting mechanisms addresses significant concerns
highlighted in sustainable finance literature. Transparency is crucial for risk mitigation
and is fundamental in building investor confidence in green finance [39]. Saudi Arabia’s
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 11 of 18

structured approach to enhancing transparency, primarily through initiatives like the Public
Investment Fund’s Green Finance Framework, underscores a commitment to developing a
robust green finance market grounded in clear, transparent, and standardised practices.
Collaborative Efforts and ESG Integration: Saudi Arabia’s active participation in
international sustainability efforts, like the One Planet Sovereign Wealth Funds initiative,
and its comprehensive Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategy highlights
its dedication to global sustainability. This strategic integration of ESG criteria aligns
with expert opinions and scholarly literature advocating for incorporating these criteria as
fundamental to sustainable economic growth and investment strategies [53]. Saudi Arabia’s
focus on ESG criteria enhances its sustainability profile and significantly contributes to the
global dialogue on best practices in green finance.
Integrating standardisation, innovative sustainability models, enhanced transparency,
and active global collaboration into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework illus-
trates a comprehensive and strategic approach to embedding green finance. This strategy
adheres to global sustainability norms and actively shapes them, offering valuable in-
sights into operationalising sustainable practices within national and international financial
systems. This ongoing dialogue enriches scholarly inquiry and practical applications, deep-
ening sustainable development and finance discourse. It invites further exploration into
how these integrated strategies can be optimised and adapted to meet emerging challenges
and opportunities in the dynamic landscape of global green finance.

5.3. Leveraging Societal Shifts and Technological Innovations

The anticipated societal shift towards sustainable investments within Saudi Arabia,
underscored by Vision 2030 and its associated green finance frameworks, signifies a broader,
transformative trend that intricately connects societal values with financial practices. This
transition is not occurring in isolation but reflects a global movement towards sustainability,
as highlighted by experts and reinforced by scholarly discourse. Integrating Environ-
mental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria into investment decisions, powered by
technological advancements, is emerging as a vital pathway for achieving the Sustainable
Development Goals.
A growing shift in consumer and investor behaviour towards sustainable investments,
as observed in the literature and by industry experts, is driven by a marked preference
for aligning personal values with investment choices. This trend, increasingly visible
in the financial sector, results from the broader recognition of the role of sustainable
investments in promoting long-term economic stability and growth. Ref. [50] highlights
this dynamic, noting how consumer preferences are becoming central to the evolution of
financial markets towards sustainability. Saudi Arabia’s initiatives to promote green finance
intensely demonstrate this societal push towards ethical investment options, which not
only respond to but also stimulate this shift, thereby catalysing the integration of individual
values into macro-economic strategies.
Technological innovations, especially in fintech and blockchain, are increasingly piv-
otal in enhancing the transparency and efficiency of green finance. These technologies offer
novel methods for tracking and verifying the environmental impact of investments, thereby
facilitating more informed decision-making among investors. “Innovations in fintech and
blockchain provide new avenues to ensure that investment impacts are clear and visible,
enhancing investor confidence and driving further interest in sustainable finance options”,
an expert noted. This perspective aligns with the academic discourse, such as that presented
by Zadek and Flynn (2013) [51], who argue that technological advancements are crucial
in revolutionising green finance by improving accessibility and efficiency. Such innova-
tions support the operational aspects of sustainable investing and enhance governance by
ensuring compliance with environmental standards and facilitating real-time monitoring
and reporting.
The synthesis of societal shifts towards sustainable investments and the integration of
technological innovations in Saudi Arabia’s financial sector underscore the necessity for
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 12 of 18

robust policy and regulatory frameworks. These frameworks are supportive and actively
promote the adoption of ESG criteria and the utilisation of technological advancements.
As Saudi Arabia continues to implement its Vision 2030 and green finance frameworks,
the literature and expert insights highlight the critical importance of policies that foster an
enabling environment for sustainable finance. Regulatory frameworks are pivotal in this
context, providing the necessary structure and oversight to ensure that financial markets
effectively contribute to sustainability goals. Scholtens (2017) [41] particularly notes the
instrumental role of regulatory bodies in guiding financial markets towards sustainable
practices, suggesting that policy interventions are crucial to steering the financial sector in
alignment with broader environmental and social objectives.
This ongoing analysis of the integration of green finance in Saudi Arabia, enriched
by expert insights and a rigorous review of the scholarly literature, reveals the complex
interplay between evolving societal expectations, rapid technological advancements, and
strategic policy developments. By examining these factors in detail, the discussion il-
luminates the multifaceted strategies Saudi Arabia employs to embed climate change
considerations and sustainability objectives deeply within its financial regulatory frame-
work. This detailed exploration highlights how societal trends, technological innovation,
and regulatory frameworks interact, emphasising that a comprehensive approach is re-
quired to successfully integrate sustainability into financial regulations. This approach
not only adapts to current demands but also anticipates future challenges and opportuni-
ties in the dynamic landscape of global green finance, driving forward the discourse on
sustainable development without concluding the exploration of these themes.

5.4. Strategic Policy Implications and Future Directions

The strategic policy implications and future directions for integrating climate change
risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation reveal the need
for a holistic approach. This approach requires regulatory adaptations, technological
innovations, and a profound societal shift towards sustainability. These dynamics involve
complex interrelations among policy, technology, and societal values, as evidenced by
expert insights, literature reviews, and analyses of Saudi green finance frameworks.

5.4.1. Strategic Policy Implications

Enhanced Regulatory Frameworks: Insights from experts and the literature stress
the urgent need for an improved regulatory framework that aligns with global standards
while reflecting the unique socio-economic context of Saudi Arabia. The Public Investment
Fund’s (PIF) Green Finance Framework, which adheres to the International Capital Market
Association (ICMA) Green Bond Principles, serves as a model for regulatory practices.
Policymakers are encouraged to broaden this framework, ensuring that all aspects of
green finance within Saudi Arabia comply with internationally recognised standards to
attract global investment flows into sustainable projects. This alignment is crucial for
enhancing Saudi’s credibility in the global green finance market, as a financial industry
expert emphasises the importance of international compliance for bolstering Saudi’s green
finance stature (expert).
Catalysing Technological Innovations: The expected societal shift towards sustainable
investments, driven by innovations in fintech and blockchain, necessitates policy support
to catalyse these technological advancements. Saudi’s Vision 2030, which prioritises digital
transformation as a key economic pillar, should be extended to promote green finance
technologies. Strategies include establishing innovation hubs, providing grants and incen-
tives for start-ups, and creating a regulatory sandbox to test new green finance products.
Such initiatives would not only accelerate the adoption of technologies that enhance the
transparency, efficiency, and accessibility of green finance but also support the broader
narrative of fintech’s transformative potential in sustainability, as discussed in academic
circles [51].
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 13 of 18

Integrating Societal Values with Financial Practices: The increasing demand for invest-
ments that align with sustainability underscores a significant societal shift towards ethical
finance. This shift necessitates policies that encourage and facilitate sustainable investment
choices. Educational campaigns and financial literacy programs tailored to green finance
could be pivotal in this integration. Policymakers should consider the implementation of
mandatory sustainability reporting for companies, which would provide investors with
essential information to make informed decisions that reflect their ethical values. This
strategy resonates with scholarly discussions on the growing impact of consumer and
investor preferences in directing the financial sector towards sustainability [50].
These strategic policy implications are crucial for embedding climate change risks
and sustainability goals effectively within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulatory framework.
By advancing these policies, Saudi Arabia can ensure that its financial systems adapt to
and lead the global shift towards sustainable financial practices. This approach aligns
with the kingdom’s broader economic and environmental objectives as outlined in Vision
2030, reflecting a deep commitment to sustainable development that integrates regulatory
foresight, technological advancement, and societal values.

5.4.2. Future Directions

The strategic policy implications and future directions for integrating climate change
risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulations are complex and
multidimensional. These efforts require a concerted approach involving policy adjustments,
technological innovations, and broad-based stakeholder engagement, ensuring that the
move towards sustainable finance is holistic and comprehensive.
Broadening Stakeholder Engagement: Future policies should aim to broaden stake-
holder engagement to facilitate a more inclusive transition towards sustainable finance.
This includes financial institutions and investors and engaging civil society, academia, and
the international community in the development and implementation of green finance
strategies. Such an inclusive approach ensures that the transition addresses various needs
and concerns, reflecting the diverse perspectives and expertise that can enrich policy formu-
lation and execution. For instance, involving academia can bring research-based insights
into policy deliberations, while civil society organisations can ensure that social equity
considerations are robustly integrated into financial strategies.
Benchmarking and Continuous Improvement: Saudi Arabia’s green finance initiatives
should be evaluated and benchmarked against international best practices to maintain
and enhance its position at the forefront of sustainable finance. This iterative process
identifies areas requiring enhancements and adaptations and ensures that the kingdom’s
financial practices align with global expectations and standards. Implementing a regular
cycle of publishing impact reports and detailed assessments of sustainability outcomes
can significantly enhance transparency and build investor confidence. Such transparency
is crucial for attracting international investments, maintaining public trust, and ensuring
accountability in pursuing sustainability goals.
Fostering International Collaboration: Considering the global nature of sustainability
challenges, Saudi Arabia should actively seek to foster international collaborations in green
finance. Participation in global forums, forming partnerships with other nations, and
contributing to international sustainability funds can enhance Saudi Arabia’s role in the
global sustainability agenda. These efforts facilitate the exchange of knowledge, promote
cooperative endeavours in addressing climate change, and help integrate Saudi Arabian
financial markets into the broader global efforts towards sustainability. Such collaborations
can also provide opportunities for Saudi Arabia to learn from and contribute to global
best practices, ensuring the kingdom’s green finance strategies reflect local needs and
global ambitions.
In discussing these strategic policy implications and future directions, integrating
climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulations de-
mands a nuanced, multifaceted approach. This approach must align regulatory frameworks
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 14 of 18

with global standards, leverage the latest technological innovations, and deeply embed
societal values into financial practices. By fostering a robust engagement with a broad array
of stakeholders and continually adapting to international standards and innovations, Saudi
Arabia can effectively navigate its transition towards a sustainable financial ecosystem.
This strategy positions the kingdom as a leader in green finance and sets a benchmark for
other nations striving to reconcile economic growth with environmental stewardship and
social equity. The ongoing discussion in this area suggests that while substantial progress
has been made, the path forward requires sustained commitment and strategic planning,
reflecting a dynamic interplay of regulatory, technological, and societal dimensions.

6. Recommendations and Future Research

Based on the comprehensive exploration of integrating climate change risks and
sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation, this study offers strategic
recommendations and identifies avenues for future research. These recommendations
are aimed at policymakers, financial institutions, and the broader stakeholder community
within Saudi Arabia and beyond. They are designed to enhance the effectiveness of green
finance initiatives, ensuring they align with global sustainability objectives and Saudi
Vision 2030.

6.1. Recommendations
Strengthen Regulatory Frameworks: Develop and refine regulatory frameworks that
explicitly incorporate green finance principles and are adaptable to evolving international
standards. This entails establishing guidelines for green bonds, loans, and other financial
instruments that fund sustainable projects.
Expand Green Finance Education and Awareness: Implement comprehensive edu-
cation and awareness programs targeting the financial sector and the public to increase
understanding and support for green finance. Such programs should emphasise the eco-
nomic and environmental benefits of sustainable investment practices.
Foster Technological Innovation: Encourage the adoption of fintech and blockchain
technologies that can enhance the transparency, efficiency, and accessibility of green finance.
Support for start-ups and innovation hubs focused on sustainable finance technologies
should be prioritised.
Enhance Public-Private Partnerships: Strengthen collaboration between government
entities, financial institutions, and private sector stakeholders to mobilise resources for
sustainable projects. These partnerships can leverage private investment to meet public
sustainability goals.
Integrate ESG Criteria into Financial Decision-Making: Mandate the integration of
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria into financial institutions’ investment
and lending decisions. This can be supported by developing standardised ESG reporting
and assessment frameworks.

6.2. Directions for Future Research

Impact Assessment of Green Finance Policies: Future studies should evaluate the
impact of green finance policies and initiatives within Saudi Arabia on environmental
sustainability and economic growth. This involves quantifying the environmental benefits
of funded projects and their contribution to Saudi’s GDP.
Comparative Analysis with Global Practices: Research comparing Saudi Arabia’s
green finance frameworks with those of other countries can provide insights into best
practices and areas for improvement. Such studies could focus on the effectiveness of policy
incentives, regulatory approaches, and market mechanisms in fostering sustainable finance.
Technological Innovations in Green Finance: Investigate the potential of emerging
technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain, in advancing green
finance. Research could explore how these technologies can improve project monitoring,
risk assessment, and investor engagement in sustainable projects.
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 15 of 18

Societal Perceptions and Engagement: Examine the attitudes and perceptions of

investors, consumers, and the broader public towards green finance and sustainability
initiatives. Understanding societal engagement with green finance can inform targeted
awareness and education strategies.
Longitudinal Studies on Market Evolution: Conduct longitudinal studies to track the
evolution of the green finance market in Saudi Arabia, analysing trends in green bond
issuance, sustainable investment flows, and the development of green finance products
over time.
By addressing these recommendations and exploring the suggested research direc-
tions, stakeholders can significantly advance the integration of sustainability into Saudi
Arabia’s financial system. This concerted effort will not only contribute to Saudi’s Vision
2030 objectives but also position Saudi Arabia as a leader in sustainable finance on the
global stage.

7. Limitations of the Study

This research offers insights into integrating climate change risks and sustainability
goals within Saudi Arabia’s financial regulation framework. However, this study’s inter-
pretive depth and applicability are constrained by several limitations, which are critical to
acknowledge for a nuanced understanding of the findings:
Insufficient Focus on Fossil Fuels and Oil: The most conspicuous limitation is the
marginal treatment of the fossil fuel sector—Saudi Arabia’s economic backbone. The
underrepresentation of this sector in the analysis potentially leads to an incomplete un-
derstanding of the intricate interplay between established energy industries and nascent
green finance initiatives. The absence of a detailed exploration into how fossil fuel reliance
might conflict with or complement green finance policies limits this study’s ability to fully
articulate the challenges and opportunities inherent in transitioning to sustainable financial
practices. This oversight is particularly critical given the global environmental impact of
fossil fuels and the geopolitical significance of oil in Saudi Arabia. Theoretical frameworks
such as path dependency and institutional inertia could provide valuable lenses for future
research to examine these dynamics more comprehensively.
General Limitations:
Expert Selection Bias: While methodologically justified, this study’s reliance on a
purposive sample of experts introduces potential biases that may affect the findings. This
selection bias might favour perspectives that align more closely with the prevailing gov-
ernmental or financial narratives promoting green finance, thus overlooking critical or
dissenting viewpoints that could offer deeper insights into the barriers to implementing
sustainable financial practices. Future studies might benefit from incorporating a more
heterogeneous expert pool or employing a Delphi method to achieve a balanced consensus
among a broader range of stakeholders.
Generalisability of Findings: The research context—centred exclusively on Saudi
Arabia—raises questions about the generalisability of the findings. Saudi Arabia’s unique
economic structure, characterised by heavy state involvement and reliance on oil revenues,
does not easily parallel other economies with different governance styles and economic
bases. This limitation suggests that findings from this study should be applied cautiously
to other contexts without substantive contextual adaptations. Comparative studies could
enrich understanding by exploring how different national contexts influence the adoption
and efficacy of green finance policies.
Scope of the Study: The scope limitation, focusing predominantly on regulatory
aspects, neglects the broader socio-political and cultural factors that influence the im-
plementation of green finance. For instance, public awareness of and attitudes towards
sustainability, the political will to enforce regulations, and the social movements advocating
for environmental accountability play crucial roles in shaping policy outcomes. Integrating
theories from political ecology or environmental sociology could enhance future research,
providing a more holistic view of how various forces converge to influence green finance.
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 16 of 18

In response to these limitations, further research should expand the theoretical and
methodological approaches to include a broader spectrum of economic activities, incor-
porate diverse expert opinions, and apply a comparative lens to analyse how different
countries integrate green finance into their financial systems. Such approaches would
address the gaps identified in this study and contribute to a more robust and nuanced
discourse on sustainable finance globally.

8. Conclusions and Policy Implications

The culmination of this research presents a comprehensive exploration into the inte-
gration of climate change risks and sustainability goals within Saudi Arabia’s financial
regulation framework, mainly through the lens of green finance. This investigation, rooted
in an extensive literature review, expert interviews, and an in-depth analysis of Saudi
Arabia’s green finance frameworks and laws, illuminates the multifaceted challenges and
opportunities characterising Saudi’s journey towards sustainable finance.
This study aligns strategically with Vision 2030, underscoring a national ambition to
foster inclusive and sustainable economic growth. Incorporating green finance principles
into the financial sector is a pivotal element in this strategy, offering a pathway towards
achieving broader sustainability objectives while addressing global environmental chal-
lenges. The analysis underscores the significance of regulatory frameworks, technological
innovations, and societal engagement in facilitating this transition, highlighting Saudi
Arabia’s efforts to harmonise with international standards and best practices.
Key findings from this research indicate that while Saudi Arabia has made commend-
able strides in establishing a foundational framework for green finance, there remain
inherent challenges in fully operationalising these initiatives. These include the need for
standardised metrics for evaluating environmental impacts, the complexity of aligning
diverse stakeholder interests, and the imperative for cultural shifts within financial institu-
tions towards sustainability. Despite these challenges, Saudi’s commitment to enhancing
transparency, fostering technological innovation, and integrating Environmental, Social,
and Governance (ESG) criteria into financial practices signals a promising future for green
finance in Saudi Arabia.
The recommendations aim to refine and expand Saudi’s green finance initiatives,
emphasising the importance of regulatory enhancement, educational programs, public–
private partnerships, and the integration of ESG criteria. Additionally, identifying avenues
for future research offers a roadmap for scholarly inquiry and policy analysis that can
support the continued evolution of sustainable finance in Saudi Arabia and beyond.
This research significantly enriches both the academic and practical discourse sur-
rounding sustainable finance. It offers profound insights into how integrating climate
change risks and sustainability goals within financial regulations can be effectively realised.
This study underscores Saudi Arabia’s critical position within the global sustainability
framework, showcasing Saudi’s capacity to spearhead substantial shifts within the finan-
cial domain that resonate with the evolving worldwide sustainability paradigm. The
progression of green finance initiatives in Saudi Arabia is not merely a step towards the
fulfilment of Vision 2030 but also a meaningful contribution to the collective global pursuit
of sustainable development and enhanced climate resilience.

Funding: This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corre-
sponding author, Dr. Mohammad O. Alhejaili, upon reasonable request. Due to privacy and ethical
restrictions, some qualitative interview data cannot be publicly available. However, anonymised
transcripts and summarised data used in the analysis are available upon request. Additional docu-
mentation can also be provided to interested researchers, including the detailed coding framework
and methodological notes.
Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 17 of 18

References
1. Khoshnava, S.M.; Rostami, R.; Zin, R.M.; Štreimikiene, D.; Yousefpour, A.; Mardani, A.; Alrasheedi, M. Contribution of green
infrastructure to the implementation of green economy in the context of sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 320–334.
[CrossRef]
2. Akomea-Frimpong, I.; Adeabah, D.; Ofosu, D.; Tenakwah, E.J. A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and
future directions. J. Sustain. Finance Investig. 2022, 12, 1241–1264. [CrossRef]
3. Public Investment Fund. PIF Green Finance Framework Preamble; Public Investment Fund: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2023.
4. Pearce, D.W.; Turner, R.K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD,
USA, 1989.
5. Horner, C.C. An assessment of the June 2012 Rio+ 20 UN conference on sustainable development. Fed. Soc. Engag. 2012, 13.
6. Ministry of Finance. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Green Financing Framework. 2024. Available online: https://ndmc.gov.sa/
investorsrelations/Documents/Green-Financing-Framework-KSA-28March2024.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2024).
7. Capasso, M.; Hansen, T.; Heiberg, J.; Klitkou, A.; Steen, M. Green growth—A synthesis of scientific findings. Technol. Forecast. Soc.
Change 2019, 146, 390–402. [CrossRef]
8. Diyar, S.; Akparova, A.; Toktabayev, A.; Tyutunnikova, M. Green economy–innovation-based development of Kazakhstan.
Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 140, 695–699. [CrossRef]
9. Loiseau, E.; Saikku, L.; Antikainen, R.; Droste, N.; Hansjürgens, B.; Pitkänen, K.; Leskinen, P.; Kuikman, P.; Thomsen, M. Green
economy and related concepts: An overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 139, 361–371. [CrossRef]
10. Merino-Saum, A.; Baldi, M.G.; Gunderson, I.; Oberle, B. Articulating natural resources and sustainable development goals
through green economy indicators: A systematic analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 139, 90–103. [CrossRef]
11. Hafner, S.; Jones, A.; Anger-Kraavi, A.; Pohl, J. Closing the green finance gap—A systems perspective. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit.
2020, 34, 26–60. [CrossRef]
12. Razzaq, A.; Sharif, A.; Ozturk, I.; Skare, M. Asymmetric influence of digital finance, and renewable energy technology innovation
on green growth in China. Renew. Energy 2023, 202, 310–319. [CrossRef]
13. DNV GL Business Assurance. Second-Party Opinion on the Green Finance Framework of the Public Investment Fund; DNV GL Business
Assurance: Oslo, Norway, 2022. Available online: https://www.pif.gov.sa/en/our-financials/green-finance-framework/
(accessed on 12 April 2024).
14. Cunha, F.A.F.D.S.; Meira, E.; Orsato, R.J. Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda. Bus. Strategy Environ.
2021, 30, 3821–3838. [CrossRef]
15. Galanakis, C.M.; Brunori, G.; Chiaramonti, D.; Matthews, R.; Panoutsou, C.; Fritsche, U.R. Bioeconomy and green recovery in a
post-COVID-19 era. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 152180. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Public Investment Fund. Second Party Opinion Government of Saudi Arabia; Public Investment Fund: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2024.
17. Nygaard, A. Green SWOT Analysis. In Green Marketing and Entrepreneurship; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzer-
land, 2024; pp. 113–135.
18. Sachs, J.D.; Kroll, C.; Lafortune, G.; Fuller, G.; Woelm, F. Sustainable Development Report 2022; Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge, UK, 2022.
19. Brzyska, J.; Szamrej-Baran, I. The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals: The EU
Perspective. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13503. [CrossRef]
20. Barcellos-Paula, L.; De la Vega, I.; Gil-Lafuente, A.M. The Quintuple Helix of innovation model and the SDGs: Latin-American
countries’ case and its forgotten effects. Mathematics 2021, 9, 416. [CrossRef]
21. Kasztelan, A.; Sulich, A. Green Transformation of the Polish Economy. In Modeling Economic Growth in Contemporary Poland;
Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2023; pp. 51–73.
22. Chaaben, N.; Elleuch, Z.; Hamdi, B.; Kahouli, B. Green economy performance and sustainable development achievement:
Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 549–564. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. AlArjani, A.; Modibbo, U.M.; Ali, I.; Sarkar, B. A new framework for the sustainable development goals of Saudi Arabia. J. King
Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101477. [CrossRef]
24. Alwakid, W.; Aparicio, S.; Urbano, D. Cultural antecedents of green entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia: An institutional approach.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 3673. [CrossRef]
25. Lin, B.; Zhou, Y. Measuring the green economic growth in China: Influencing factors and policy perspectives. Energy 2022, 241,
122518. [CrossRef]
26. Usubiaga-Liano, A.; Ekins, P. Monitoring the environmental sustainability of countries through the strong environmental
sustainability index. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 132, 108281. [CrossRef]
27. Singh, K. Quantitative Social Research Methods; Sage: New Delhi, India, 2007.
28. Grant, C.; Osanloo, A. Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the
blueprint for your “house”. Adm. Issues J. 2014, 4, 4. [CrossRef]
29. Adeoye-Olatunde, O.A.; Olenik, N.L. Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. J. Am. Coll. Clin. Pharm. 2021,
4, 1358–1367. [CrossRef]
30. Hennink, M.; Kaiser, B.N. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc. Sci. Med.
2022, 292, 114523. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sustainability 2024, 16, 4159 18 of 18

31. Castro, N.R.; Chousa, J.P. An integrated framework for the financial analysis of sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2006, 15,
322–333. [CrossRef]
32. Nowell, L.S.; Norris, J.M.; White, D.E.; Moules, N.J. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int. J. Qual.
Methods 2017, 16, 1609406917733847. [CrossRef]
33. Amran, Y.A.; Amran, Y.M.; Alyousef, R.; Alabduljabbar, H. Renewable and sustainable energy production in Saudi Arabia
according to Saudi Vision 2030; Current status and future prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 247, 119602. [CrossRef]
34. Bengo, I.; Boni, L.; Sancino, A. EU financial regulations and social impact measurement practices: A comprehensive framework
on finance for sustainable development. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2022, 29, 809–819. [CrossRef]
35. Kemfert, C.; Schmalz, S. Sustainable finance: Political challenges of development and implementation of framework conditions.
Green Financ. 2019, 1, 237–248. [CrossRef]
36. Falcone, P.M.; Sica, E. The role of sustainable finance during the global health crisis: Transformative innovation policies for
environmental and social sustainability. In Sustainable Finance and the Global Health Crisis; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2023;
pp. 43–54.
37. Falcone, P.M.; Morone, P.; Sica, E. Greening of the financial system and fuelling a sustainability transition: A discursive approach
to assess landscape pressures on the Italian financial system. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 127, 23–37. [CrossRef]
38. Ziolo, M.; Filipiak, B.Z.; Bak,
˛ I.; Cheba, K. How to design more sustainable financial systems: The roles of environmental, social,
and governance factors in the decision-making process. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5604. [CrossRef]
39. Busch, T.; Lewandowski, S. Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 2018, 22, 745–759.
[CrossRef]
40. Vazquez-Brust, D.; Piao, R.S.; Melo, M.F.d.S.d.; Yaryd, R.T.; Carvalho, M.M. The governance of collaboration for sustainable
development: Exploring the “black box”. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120260. [CrossRef]
41. Scholtens, B. Why Finance Should Care about Ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2017, 32, 500–505. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Gerlich, M. How Short-Term Orientation Dominates Western Businesses and the Challenges They Face—An Example Using
Germany, the UK, and the USA. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 25. [CrossRef]
43. Epstein, M.J. The challenge of simultaneously improving social and financial performances: New research results. In Performance
Measurement and Management Control: Innovative Concepts and Practices; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2010;
pp. 3–18.
44. Epstein, M.J.; Buhovac, A.R. Solving the sustainability implementation challenge. Organ. Dyn. 2010, 39, 306. [CrossRef]
45. Dusík, J.; Bond, A. Environmental assessments and sustainable finance frameworks: Will the EU Taxonomy change the mindset
over the contribution of EIA to sustainable development? Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2022, 40, 90–98. [CrossRef]
46. Berjawi, A.E.H.; Walker, S.L.; Patsios, C.; Hosseini, S.H.R. An evaluation framework for future integrated energy systems: A
whole energy systems approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 111163. [CrossRef]
47. Nedopil, C.; Dordi, T.; Weber, O. The Nature of Global Green Finance Standards—Evolution, Differences, and Three Models.
Sustainability 2021, 13, 3723. [CrossRef]
48. Taghizadeh-Hesary, F.; Yoshino, N. Sustainable solutions for green financing and investment in renewable energy projects.
Energies 2020, 13, 788. [CrossRef]
49. Finger, M.; Gavious, I.; Manos, R. Environmental risk management and financial performance in the banking industry: A
cross-country comparison. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 2018, 52, 240–261. [CrossRef]
50. Clark, G.L.; Feiner, A.; Viehs, M. From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance.
SSRN 2015, 2508281. [CrossRef]
51. Zadek, S.; Flynn, C. South-Originating Green Finance: Exploring the Potential, The Geneva International Finance Dialogues. Int.
Inst. Sustain. Dev. Swiss 2013, 30, 2016.
52. D’amato, D.; Korhonen, J. Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability
framework. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 188, 107143. [CrossRef]
53. Sullivan, A.; White, D.D.; Larson, K.L.; Wutich, A. Towards water sensitive cities in the Colorado River Basin: A comparative
historical analysis to inform future urban water sustainability transitions. Sustainability 2017, 9, 761. [CrossRef]

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.