Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

ARTICLE IN PRESS

Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897


www.elsevier.com/locate/tourman

Case study

A study of the impact of personal innovativeness on online travel


shopping behavior—A case study of Korean travelers
Hae Young Leea,1, Hailin Qua,, Yoo Shin Kimb,2
a
School of Hotel and Restaurant Administration, Oklahoma State University, 210 HESW, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
b
Samsung Everland Inc., 50, Mabuk-dong, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 446-912, Republic of Korea
Received 4 April 2006; accepted 5 April 2006

Abstract

Given online travel shopping is a relatively new concept and innovative behavior, research addressing the effect of traveler’s inherent
innovative personality on his/her online shopping behavior has relevance. This study examines how online traveler’s decision-making
paradigm may vary according to the traveler’s personal innovativeness level, by utilizing Fishbein and Ajzen’s (1975, Belief, attitude,
intention and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley) reasoned action theory as a theoretical background. The results indicate that
highly innovative travelers are mainly influenced by their positive attitudes when they embrace online shopping; while less innovative
travelers rely on both attitude and the referral’s opinions to reduce uncertainty inherent in online transactions. One special finding was
that for highly innovative travelers, the propensity to shop for travel-related products would decrease with increasing the referent’s social
influence.
r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Travelers’ personal innovativeness; Theory of reasoned action (TRA); Online travel shopping behavior

1. Introduction comparing the product content and the price through


direct searches on the Internet (Machlis, 1997). Moreover,
As online travel shopping continues to gain acceptance not all travelers show the same level of interest in shopping
by travelers, many travel businesses are aware of the travel products and services online. Some travelers are
business benefits of the Internet as a commercial vehicle more inclined to blend new technologies into their daily
(Beldona, Morrison, & O’Leary, 2005; Forsythe & Shi, buying activities, while others tend to hesitate to shop
2003; Murphy & Tan, 2003). The efficient use of the online (Beldona, Kline, & Morrison, 2004). Thus, a better
Internet helps travel businesses to reduce costs, improve understanding of online traveler’s buying behavior is
service quality, and realize profits by targeting new markets needed to implement more successful online marketing
that otherwise cannot be attained (Kim & Lee, 2004; strategies.
Limayem, Khalifa, & Frini, 2000). During the last decade, much research has been
Despite the business benefits of online travel shopping, conducted to explain online consumers’ buying behavior.
retaining online travelers is never easy. This is because Most researchers have been interested in testing how
bargaining power has begun to shift from sellers to buyers existing theories of consumer behavior can be utilized to
(Ahuja, Gupta, & Raman, 2003). Online travelers can cover all aspects of the online consumer’s decision-making
review many different online travel websites by easily process (Ahuja et al., 2003). The attitude-based theory has
served as the dominant theoretical framework (Bobbitt &
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 405 744 6711; fax: +1 405 744 6299.
Dabholkar, 2001; Fagerstrøm, 2005; Olson & Zanna,
1993). Some studies (e.g., Eastin, 2002; Khalifa &
E-mail addresses: haeyoung.lee@okstate.edu (H.Y. Lee),
h.qu@okstate.edu (H. Qu), yooshin.kim@samsung.com (Y.S. Kim).
Limayem, 2003; O’Cass & Fenech, 2003) have probed
1
Tel.: +1 405 332 0754. several motivational perceptions related to online con-
2
Tel.: +82 31 288 0843. sumers’ attitude formation, others (e.g., Athiyaman, 2002;

0261-5177/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.013
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897 887

Shim, Eastlick, Lotz, & Warrington, 2001) have focused on which is defined as the traveler’s receptivity to online travel
how strong a relation exists among proposed variables shopping in this study (Agarwal & Prasad, 1998). Recent
within a given online context. IT research (e.g., Im et al., 2003; Jones, Sundaram, & Chin,
However, in spite of its importance and the implication, 2002; O’Cass & Fenech, 2003; Rogers, 1995) has focused
less attention has been given to the potential moderating on the individual’s innate innovativeness to explain the
effect of relevant individual differences on the accepted individual’s different adoption and use of innovative
relationships of the online purchasing decision model technologies. Some individuals are more inclined to
(Bobbitt & Dabholkar, 2001; Fagerstrøm, 2005). Only a embrace new technologies, while others follow the lead of
few studies elucidate the conditions that influence online highly innovative individuals (Limayem et al., 2000), since
consumers’ decision-making paradigm (e.g., Chiu, Lin, & different people would have different levels of willingness
Tang, 2005; Karahanna, Straub, & Chervany, 1999; to try out innovative technologies (Bhatnagar, Misra, &
Limayem et al., 2000). Rao, 2000; Eastin, 2002; Rogers, 1995; Thatcher &
Recent research (e.g., Beldona et al., 2004; Im, Bayus, & Perrewé, 2002).
Mason, 2003; Limayem et al., 2000) in this regard sheds Research on the role of personal innovativeness in new
light on stable individual differences such as an innovative technologies has been conducted in a variety of settings
predisposition to explain different influences on online such as sales force automation (SFA) (e.g., Jones et al.,
shopping behavior. Such research streams are timely and 2002), office automation (e.g., Agarwal & Prasad, 1998;
relevant, given that online shopping is a relatively new Leonard-Barton & Deschamps, 1988), web retailing (e.g.,
concept which is more likely to be embraced by innovators. O’Cass & Fenech, 2003), and online shopping (e.g.,
A person’s innate innovative personality may influence Bhatnagar et al., 2000; Im et al., 2003; Limayem et al.,
how he/she perceives and uses online shopping. 2000). Jones et al. (2002) examined and found that the
To investigate the additional impact of personal degree of an individual’s technology usage behavior is
innovativeness on online buying behavior process, Fishbein determined by the level of his/her personal innovativeness.
and Ajzen’s (1975) theory of reasoned action (TRA) is Agarwal and Prasad (1998) demonstrated that the relation-
adopted as a theoretical foundation for this study since it is ship between users’ perceptions of the Internet and
a widely used attitude model for explaining consumers’ intentions to use may vary based on their innovative
buying behavior (Fagerstrøm, 2005; Olson & Zanna, 1993). dispositions. Leonard-Barton and Deschamps (1988) also
It is also that TRA takes social forces well into account in argued that highly innovative users with managerial
predicting human behavior, though the role of social support are likely to use a certain technology, while low
influence continues to be an issue of debate (Karahanna et innovative users with no managerial support are not as
al., 1999; Taylor & Todd, 1995; Venkatesh & Morris, likely to accept and use the proposed system. Similarly,
2000). O’Cass and Fenech (2003) suggested that highly innovative
This study attempts to determine how travelers’ online web users are more likely to develop more positive attitude
shopping behavior varies depending on their personal toward new technologies.
innovativeness. Clearly, this study posits that travelers’ Rogers’ (1995) innovation diffusion theory lends addi-
innovative predisposition would influence relationships tional support by suggesting that users’ personality
among their attitude, subjective norm, and shopping differences can potentially influence how users form their
behavior. This study also re-examines whether two key intentions to perform behaviors. By exploring the technol-
antecedents (i.e., attitude and subjective norm) are ogy adoption stages, Rogers (1995) revealed that (1) users
significant variables in predicting travelers’ online shopping with higher levels of personal innovativeness are more
behavior. Specifically, based on Fishbein and Ajzen’s prone to have more favorable attitude toward new
(1975) TRA, two major determinants (attitude and technologies; and (2) highly innovative users are more
subjective norm) of online shopping behavior are first willing to embrace new technologies into their daily routine
identified and one individual difference moderator (perso- by coping with the uncertainty of innovative technologies.
nal innovativeness) is then included in this study. The Within the context of online shopping, an individual’s
results of this study made theoretical contributions to the innovative personality has been explored as a concept of
Fishbein and Ajzen’s (1975)’s reasoned action theory and risk-taking tendencies, since an innovative behavior such as
provide meaningful implications to online travel marketers online shopping involves unavoidable risk and uncertainty
who would like to assess travelers’ demand for their online (Bhatnagar et al., 2000; Kwak, Fox, & Zinkhan, 2002).
service and increase future purchasing behavior. Specifically, online shoppers cannot ensure the degree of
service quality when they make a purchase online. They
2. Literature review tend to perceive online shopping to be more risky
compared to offline purchasing (Kwak et al., 2002). Online
2.1. The role of personal innovativeness in technology usage shopping is thus, more prone to be welcomed and adopted
by highly innovative shoppers, who have high levels of self-
Personal innovativeness is an individual’s inherent confidence about their online purchase behaviors (Li-
innovative personality with respect to new technologies, mayem et al., 2000; Thatcher & Perrewé, 2002).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
888 H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897

Recent travel research has also indicated that travelers’ Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975):
risk-taking tendencies are significantly related to their
B ¼ w1 BI,
innate personal innovativeness (e.g., Beldona et al.,
2004; Christou, Avdimiotis, Kassianidis, & Sigala, 2004;
BI ¼ w2 A þ w3 SN,
Klein, Köhne, & Öörni, 2004; Nysveen, 2003; Sigala,
2004). In general, online travelers undergo a certain where w1, w2, and w3 is the subjective weights for a
degree of uncertainty when they shop for travel-related particular person.
products online, since they cannot evaluate travel pro- According to TRA, attitude refers to the person’s
ducts and services prior to purchase (Weber & Roehl, evaluation about performing the target behavior. Attitude
1999). However, not all travelers have the same risk- is a function of the product of beliefs about consequences
taking capacity and risk tolerance level when they of performing a specific behavior and the consequences
shop for travel products and services online. Travelers evaluation (Davis, Bagozzi, & Warshaw, 1989; Mathieson,
with higher personal innovativeness are more will- 1991). On the contrary, subjective norm represents the
ing to take risks and purchase travel products and services person’s perception of social influence to perform the given
online earlier than less innovative travelers (Beldona et al., behavior. Subjective norm is also a function of expecta-
2004). tions of a particular referent and motivation to comply
Christou et al. (2004), within the context of electronic with these expectations (Taylor & Todd, 1995).
tickets (Etix) for air travel, demonstrated that Etix TRA made a major contribution to the previous attitude
adopters are highly innovative air travelers who are more research by proposing behavioral intentions as the most
disposed to accept the uncertainty of paperless e-ticket important determinant of a person’s behavior. The main
service through the development of self-confidence in their interest of human behavior has been shifted from attitude
ability to evaluate a process and the results before they to behavioral intention (Bobbitt & Dabholkar, 2001;
buy. By linking leisure tourists’ information seeking Brown, 1999a). There are three main assumptions that
behavior and their risk perceptions associated with online affect the applicability of the TRA (Ajzen & Fishbein,
travel shopping, Nysveen (2003) also found that to cope 1977; Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975). First, the behavior should
with higher levels of uncertainty surrounding the online be under a person’s volitional control. Any behavior that is
travel shopping, innovative leisure travelers are less likely not under any consciousness of effort cannot be explained
to engage in risk-reducing information search activities by its corresponding behavioral intention (Fagerstrøm,
when compared to non-innovative leisure travelers. More- 2005; Oh & Hsu, 2001). Second, attitudes and intentions
over, Sigala (2004) mentioned that travelers vary in their should be equally specific to each situation and identical on
adoption stage of online travel booking according to their four such elements as action, target, context, and time,
perceived risk in online travel shopping. Similarly, Klein et since some measures that apply in one context may vary
al. (2004) demonstrated that higher complex travel across different contexts (Brown, 1999b; Mathieson, 1991).
products such as vacations, honeymoons, and cruises tend Third, given that intentions can also change over time, a
to involve more uncertainty in transactions; suggesting that minimum time period should be allowed to increase the
the propensity to buy such high complex travel products likelihood that a person’s behavioral intention may lead to
increases with increasing individuals’ receptivity levels to the person’s desired behavior (Brown, 1999a, 1999b;
online travel shopping. Fagerstrøm, 2005).
These basic premises can be met successfully into the
2.2. Theory of reasoned action (TRA) online travel shopping context in that (1) travelers engage
into online transactions with their rational and volitional
Over the last three decades, various models were choice; (2) online travel shopping is enough of a narrow
introduced to explain a person’s voluntary and volitional and specific context to predict specific behavior. Moreover,
behavior. Of these models, Fishbein and Ajzen’s (1975) some situational factors, referring to adequate opportu-
TRA has been one of the most widely used as a theoretical nities and resources related to online shopping, are not a
background (Brown, 1999b; Fagerstrøm, 2005; Olson & big issue in Korea’s e-commerce market, given Korea’s e-
Zanna, 1993). TRA’s foundation is based on the attitu- commerce penetration through the country’s widespread
de–behavior literature, assuming that human behavior broadband access (Korea National Computerization
could be explained by attitudes (Bobbitt & Dabholkar, Agency, 2002).
2001; Oh & Hsu, 2001). The underlying concept of TRA is TRA has also received substantial empirical support by
essentially that people evaluate the implications of their several hospitality and tourism studies. It has been applied
reasoned action before they decide to perform a particular to a wide range of behaviors such as online travel
behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980). Specifically, this model purchasing (Njite & Parsa, 2004), cultural heritage sites
posits that a person’s behavior (B) is determined by the visitation (Brown, 1999a, 1999b), casino gambling (Oh &
person’s intention to perform the behavior (BI), which in Hsu, 2001), meeting participation (Lee & Back, 2005),
turn is predicted by the person’s attitude (A) and subjective healthier food choice (Corney, Eves, Kipps, & Noble,
norm toward the behavior (SN) (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980; 1998), and local cuisine/ethnic food experience (Ryu &
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897 889

Jang, 2005; Zhang & Roseman, 2005). Results of these engage in a given behavior (O’Cass & Fenech, 2003). Thus,
studies indicated that a person’s rational behavior is a these arguments suggest the following hypotheses.
function of his/her attitude toward the target behavior and
perception of social press. In general, a person’s rational Hypothesis 1-1. Attitude toward online travel shopping
behavior is more affected by his/her attitude toward a will be positively associated with online travelers’ intention
particular behavior than a person’s perception of social to search.
influence to perform the given behavior.
Hypothesis 1-2. Attitude toward online travel shopping
will be positively associated with online travelers’ intention
3. Research model and hypotheses to purchase.

The research model presented in Fig. 1 illustrates how A person’s behavior can also be predicted by his/her
the existence and strength of a relation among attitude, perceived opinions of referents as well as his/her attitude
subjective norm, and shopping behavior could be different toward the behavior (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980). This implies
depending on travelers’ innovative predisposition. In the possibility that an individual could act based on his/her
addition to Fishbein and Ajzen’s (1975) TRA model, the referents’ opinions, though he/she does not have a positive
personal innovativeness as the individual difference mod- attitude toward a certain behavior (Brown, 1999b). In
erator was added in the model to test if the personal general, subjective norm has been revealed to be more
innovativeness has significant impact on online shopping important in the early stages of a particular system usage
behavior. (Karahanna et al., 1999), for those without prior experi-
In examining how travelers’ online buying behavior ence (Taylor & Todd, 1995), and for women (Venkatesh &
depends largely on their innovative predisposition, inten- Morris, 2000). Thus, the following hypotheses were tested.
tion to search as well as intention to purchase was included
Hypothesis 2-1. Subjective norm toward online travel
in this study as an important outcome variable of online
shopping will be positively associated with online travelers’
shopping behavior, since a person’s search intention also
intention to search.
acts as a strong precursor of future buying behavior
(Bellman, Lohse, & Johnson, 1999; Piga & Filippi, 2002; Hypothesis 2-2. Subjective norm toward online travel
Shim et al., 2001). In general, online customers gather as shopping will be positively associated with online travelers’
much information as possible by browsing several websites intention to purchase.
before buying products and services for the purpose of
reducing costs. Online customer’s search and purchase Given that online shopping is a relatively new concept,
intentions should be understood as hierarchical processes innovative consumers are more apt to be early buyers
(Shim et al., 2001). (Goldsmith, 2001). Compared to less innovative consu-
The attitude–behavior link has been a fundamental focus mers, more innovative consumers tend to seek out new
of human behavior research (Bobbitt & Dabholkar, 2001; experiences such as online shopping (Chiu et al., 2005;
Olson & Zanna, 1993). It is generally suggested that a Limayem et al., 2000). They play a prominent role as
person’s attitude toward a particular behavior predicts his/ opinion leaders by encouraging less innovative travelers to
her behavioral intention and actual behavior, though engage in online shopping. In addition, personal innova-
different people would have different attitude formation tiveness toward online shopping has newly been found to
(Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975; Karahanna et al., 1999). influence consumers’ decision-making paradigm. The high-
Specifically, if a customer does not have a favorable er the level of a consumer’s personal innovativeness, the
attitude toward a particular behavior, the customer would greater the positive relationship is between a consumer’s
be more likely to perform the behavior; while if a customer attitude toward online shopping and his/her behavioral
has an unfavorable attitude, the customer was less likely to intention (Beldona et al., 2004; Klein et al., 2004, Sigala,

Attitude
H1-1
H3-1
H3-2 Intention to
H1-2 search
Personal
innovativenes
H2-1
H4-1 Intention to
H4-2 purchase
H2-2
Subjective
norm

Fig. 1. Conceptual framework of the study.


ARTICLE IN PRESS
890 H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897

2004). In view of these arguments, the following hypotheses modifications were also made and a final questionnaire was
were proposed. developed.
The Cronbach’s alpha values of three measurements
Hypothesis 3-1. Personal innovativeness will moderate the (attitude, subjective norm, personal innovativeness) were
relationship between online travelers’ attitude and their .83, .75, and .87, respectively, indicating that all variables
intention to search. were considered to be internally consistent (Hair, Ander-
Hypothesis 3-2. Personal innovativeness will moderate the son, Tatham, & Black, 1995). The alpha coefficients of two
relationship between online travelers’ attitude and their measurements (intention to search and intention to
intention to purchase. purchase) for the present sample were .65 and .82,
respectively, which demonstrates adequate reliability
Hypothesis 4-1. Personal innovativeness will moderate the (Burns & Bush, 2001).
relationship between online travelers’ subjective norm and Since self-report measures from a single source were used
their intention to purchase. to gather data, this study includes the possibility of a same-
source variance problem such as common method bias. A
Hypothesis 4-2. Personal innovativeness will moderate the single-factor test was used as a way to control for common
relationship between online travelers’ subjective norm and method bias, since the total number of variables proposed
their intention to search. in this study is minimal (Podsakoff & Organ, 1986). Results
showed that a single factor was not extracted from the
4. Methodology initial set of variables, which indicate that common method
bias is not a significant problem in this study.
4.1. Survey instrument
4.2. Sampling and survey procedures
A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the
data. The questionnaire was divided into three sections. A convenience sampling method was used for data
The first section of the questionnaire asked about the collection. Data were obtained from travel subscriber e-
respondents’ general online shopping behavior such as mail addresses of a large wholesale travel agency in South
duration of usage, hours of usage per day and number of Korea. The participants were limited to known subscribers
purchases. The second section included 14 questions who had purchased travel products online at least once in
measuring the respondents’ attitude, subjective norm, the last one year. Modetour Network (www.modetour.-
personal innovativeness, and intention. All items were co.kr) was secured as the research site, since it is one of the
measured with five-point Likert scales ranging from leading travel agencies in South Korea, with well-adminis-
strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). The scales for tered one-stop online travel shopping site as well as a
attitude and subjective norm were generated based on nationwide online travel members (The Korea Travel
Taylor and Todd (1995). Attitude was measured with four Times, 2001). Given this study’s focus is on online
items asking subjects to indicate how they feel about online travelers, a web-based online survey was adopted as the
travel shopping. Subjective norm was measured with two survey method. A web-based online survey method has
items. The respondents were asked to indicate the some advantages over the traditional paper-based survey:
importance of referents approving of their use of the (1) lower costs, (2) faster responses, and (3) geographically
Internet for shopping. Personal innovativeness was mea- unrestricted sample (Ridings, Gefen, & Arinze, 2002). An
sured with four items adapted from Agarwal and Prasad e-mail explaining the purpose of the survey and containing
(1998). Respondents were asked to indicate the extent to the link to the web-based survey was distributed to all 974
which they agreed with statements relating to their selected online members. The respondents were asked to
willingness to try new online shopping technology. Two complete the self-administered web questionnaire based on
dependent variables, intention to search and intention to their shopping experience when using a particular travel-
purchase were adapted from Venkatesh and Davis (2000). related website during the last 12 months. The main survey
The respondents were asked to indicate their intention that was conducted from July 1, 2003 to August 15, 2003.
they would search travel-related information and purchase A total of 235 surveys were completed which resulted in
a particular travel-related product through the Internet. a 24.1% response rate. Of these, 27 were discarded because
The final section assessed respondents’ socio-demographic they were not fully completed and 208 questionnaires were
information such as age, gender, education, and income. used for further data analysis. In order to ensure external
In order to validate the instrument, two Korean validity, demographics of the sample were matched with
professors reviewed the relevance of the instruments for those of known population data of Internet users (Ridings
online travelers. Some modifications of the questionnaire et al., 2002). The demographic results of this study were
were made, based on the comments collected through this consistent with those of a 2002 Korea Internet White
pre-test. Following the pre-test, a pilot test consisting of 50 Paper, which indicated that the online population is
randomly selected online members was conducted. Conse- relatively younger, more educated, with a higher income
quently, based on feedback from the pilot test, minor (Korea National Computerization Agency, 2002).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897 891

4.3. Data analysis Table 1


Descriptive statistics of respondents’ characteristics (n ¼ 208)
Hierarchical moderated regression analysis (Aiken & Demographics Frequency Percent
West, 1991) was used to test the hypotheses. Hierarchical
moderated regression attempts to improve standard Gender
regression estimates by adding a second-stage regression Male 128 61.5
Female 80 38.5
to an ordinary model. It adds terms to the regression model
in stages. At each stage, an additional term or terms are Age
added to the model and the change in R2 is calculated. A 19–28 97 46.6
29–38 72 34.6
hypothesis test was undertaken to test whether the change
39–48 32 15.4
in R2 is significantly different from zero. The significance of Over 49 7 3.4
the interaction can be assessed after controlling for all main
Education
effects (Anderson, 1986).
High school 16 7.7
Separate analyses were conducted for intention to search 2-year College 48 23.1
and intention to purchase, which were the two outcome 4-year College/University 134 64.4
variables in this study. Given that the demographic Graduate 10 4.8
variables of age, gender, education, and income have been Annual income
found to have a significant effect on online travelers’ Less than $20,000 8 3.8
shopping behavior (Bellman et al., 1999; Bonn, Furr, & $20,000–$29,999 80 38.5
Susskind, 1998; Forsythe & Shi, 2003; Weber & Roehl, $30,000–$39,999 64 30.8
Over $40,000 56 26.9
1999), these demographic variables were included as
control variables in the regression analysis to avoid Duration of usage
potential causal influence on online travel shopping Less than 12 months 4 1.9
13–24 months 4 1.9
behavior. That is, as the control variables, online travelers’
25–36 months 24 11.5
demographics (i.e., age, gender, education, and income) Over 36 months 176 84.6
were entered first in step 1. In step 2, attitude, subjective
Hours of usage/day
norm, and personal innovativeness were included in the
Less than 1 h 48 23.1
model. In the last step, the interaction terms, attitu- 1–2 h 80 38.5
de  personal innovativeness and subjective 2–3 h 40 19.2
norm  personal innovativeness were entered into the Over 3 h 40 19.2
model to test the interaction effects. In order to represent Times of purchase
the interaction terms, the variables were first centered and 1 time 8 3.8
then multiplied together to eliminate multicollinearity 2 times 16 7.7
(Aiken & West, 1991). An F-test, associated with the 3 times 40 19.2
Over 3 times 144 69.2
change in R2 after the block is entered, was performed to
assess the contribution of each step (Anderson, 1986).
Based on the procedures suggested by Aiken and West
(1991), interaction effects were inspected by plotting two
subgroup regression lines—one at one standard deviation reported spending 1 h or more per day online and 88.4%
above the mean, the other at one standard deviation below had 3 or more years of online purchasing experience.
the mean.
5.2. Intention to search
5. Results
The means, standard deviations, and correlations for all
5.1. Profile of respondents study variables are presented in Table 2. Attitude and
subjective norm were positively correlated with intention to
Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics of the respon- search (r ¼ :49, po:01; r ¼ :21, po:01) and with intention
dents. The majority of respondents were male (61.5%), age to purchase (r ¼ :37, po:01; r ¼ :43, po:01), respectively.
19–38 (81.2%), and had received at least a 2-year degree Results of the hierarchical moderated regression analysis
(92.3%). (see Table 3) show that the addition of the interaction
Only 3.8% of the respondents had annual incomes of less terms improves the amount of variance in intention to
than $20,000, 69.3% had incomes of $20,000 to $39,999, search significantly (DR2 ¼ :06, F ¼ 11:91, po:001).
and 26.9% reported incomes of $40,000 or more. Among the control variables, age (b1 ¼ :13, po:05) and
In terms of respondents’ online behavior, nearly 85% education (b3 ¼ :31, po:001) remained significant in the
had 3 or more years of online experience, while only 1.9% final model. With respect to the independent variables,
of the respondents had been online users for less than 1 attitude (b5 ¼ :55, po:001) and personal innovativeness
year. About three-quarters (76.9%) of the respondents (b7 ¼ :29, po:001) were found to be significant in the final
ARTICLE IN PRESS
892 H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897

Table 2
Means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations matrix

Mean SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Control variables
1. Age 31.05 8.36 —
2. Gender 1.39 .49 .49 —
3. Education 2.66 .69 .13 .15 —
4. Annual income 2.81 .88 .13 .01 .22 —
Independent variables
5. Attitude 2.81 1.60 .17 .15 .07 .14 —
6. Subjective norm 2.71 .97 .13 .22 .07 .04 .32 —
7. Personal innovativeness 3.19 1.12 .17 .05 .01 .03 .40 .02 —
Dependent variables
8. Intention to search 3.90 .82 .06 .01 .23 .22 .49 .21 .53 —
9. Intention to purchase 3.77 .67 .03 .04 .43 .08 .37 .43 .44 .48

Note: Gender: 1 ¼ male, 2 ¼ female. Education: 1 ¼ High school, 2 ¼ 2-year College, 3 ¼ 4-year College/University, 4 ¼ Graduate.
Annual income: 1 ¼ Less than $20,000, 2 ¼ $20,000–$29,999, 3 ¼ $30,000–$39,999, 4 ¼ Over $40,000.
 po.05.
 po.01.

Table 3 search (b8 ¼ :24, po:001; b9 ¼ :22, po:001) (see also


Hierarchical moderated regression analysis on intention to search Table 3). Thus, H3-1, which hypothesized that attitude and
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
personal innovativeness, would interact to predict online
travelers’ intention to search and H4-1, suggesting sub-
Control variables jective norm and personal innovativeness would interact to
B1 Age .12 .09 .13 predict online travelers’ intention to search, were both not
B2 Gender .03 .04 .06
rejected.
B3 Education .20 .24 .31
B4 Annual income .19 .13 .01
Independent variables
5.3. Intention to purchase
B5 Attitude .32 .55
B6 Subjective norm .11 .09
B7 Personal innovativeness .38 .29 Table 4 shows the results of the hierarchical moderated
regression analysis on intention to purchase, the second
Interaction
B8 Attitude  Personal .24 dependent variable. Even though the increased amount of
innovativeness variance was slight, the addition of interaction terms
B9 Subjective norm  Personal .22 explained a significant incremental portion of variance in
innovativeness intention to purchase (DR2 ¼ :02, F ¼ 4:53, po:05).
R2 .09 .46 .52
Among the control variables, only education (b3 ¼ :49,
Adjusted R2 .08 .45 .50
F-value 5.18 24.92 24.14 po:001) was significant in the final equations, with the
DR2 .37 .06 more educated travelers being more likely to purchase
F-value for DR2 46.59 11.91 online. After entering the interaction terms, attitude
(b5 ¼ :30, po:001), subjective norm (b6 ¼ :36, po:001)
Note: Standardized regression coefficients are reported in columns marked
and personal innovativeness (b7 ¼ :34, po:001) were all
Model 1, Model 2, Model 3.
 po.05. significantly related to intention to purchase. Thus, H1-2
 po.01. and H2-2, which involves the effects of attitude and
 po.001.
subjective norm on intention to purchase, were not rejected
in the intention to purchase model.
model, while subjective norm (b6 ¼ :09, n.s.) became The interaction of attitude and personal innovativeness
insignificant. Thus, H1-1, positing that attitude toward was significantly related to intention to purchase
online travel shopping would be positively associated with (b8 ¼ :18, po:01). Thus, H3-2 which hypothesized
the online traveler’s intention to search, was not rejected that attitude and personal innovativeness would inter-
(see Table 3). However, H2-1, which stipulated a positive act to predict the online traveler’s intention to purchase
relation between subjective norm and the online traveler’s was not rejected. However, the interaction of subjective
intention to search, was rejected. norm and personal innovativeness was not significantly
In addition, two interaction terms of personal innova- related to intention to purchase (b9 ¼ :05, n.s.). Thus,
tiveness were also significantly related to intention to H4-2 proposing that subjective norm and personal
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897 893

Table 4 5
Hierarchical moderated regression analysis on intention to purchase
4.5
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Intention to search
4
Control variables
B1 Age .10 .07 .06
B2 Gender .03 .08 .03 3.5
B3 Education .44 .44 .49
B4 Annual income .01 .03 .07 3 High innovativeness
Independent variables Low innovativeness
2.5
B5 Attitude .17 .30
B6 Subjective norm .37 .36
2
B7 Personal innovativeness .36 .34
Low High
Interaction Attitude
B8 Attitude  Personal .18
innovativeness Fig. 2. Relationship between attitude and intention to search at two levels
B9 Subjective norm  .05 of personal innovativeness.
Personal innovativeness
R2 .19 .56 .58
Adjusted R2 .18 .55 .56 5
F-value 12.17 36.87 30.70
DR2 .37 .02
4.5
F-value for DR2 56.50 4.53 Intention to search
Note: Standardized regression coefficients are reported in columns marked 4
Model 1, Model 2, Model 3.
 po.05. 3.5
po.01.
po.001.
3 High innovativeness
Low innovativeness
2.5
innovativeness would significantly interact to predict the
2
online traveler’s intention to purchase was rejected.
Low High
Subjective Norm
5.4. Interaction effects
Fig. 3. Relationship between subjective norm and intention to search at
To better understand the pattern of interaction effects, two levels of personal innovativeness.
the significant interactions were depicted graphically
following the procedures described by Aiken and West
(1991). The relationship between attitude and intention to 4.5
search at two levels (means71 standard deviation) of the
personal innovativeness is shown in Fig. 2. It revealed that 4
Intention to purchase

the relationship between attitude and intention to search


was stronger among online travelers with low levels of 3.5
personal innovativeness than among respondents with high
levels of personal innovativeness. Specifically, online 3
travelers with low levels of personal innovativeness were
High innovativeness
more likely to search the travel-related products through
2.5 Low innovativeness
the Internet when they had high levels of attitude than
those with high levels of personal innovativeness.
In Fig. 3, the relationship between subjective norm and 2
Low High
intention to search is depicted. The relationship between
subjective norm and intention to search was negative at Attitude
high levels of personal innovativeness, while it was positive Fig. 4. Relationship between attitude and intention to purchase at two
at low levels of personal innovativeness. Although the levels of personal innovativeness.
difference was very small, online travelers who have low
personal innovativeness were more likely to search the Finally, the interaction for intention to purchase was
travel-related products when they had high levels of plotted in Fig. 4. The relationship between attitude and
subjective norm than those who had high personal intention to purchase was stronger among online travelers
innovativeness. with low levels of personal innovativeness than among
ARTICLE IN PRESS
894 H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897

respondents with high levels of personal innovativeness. comparison to those with high innovativeness, online
Specifically, there was little difference in intention to travelers with low innovativeness were more likely to
purchase for high and low personal innovativeness search travel-related information online when they have
travelers, when they had high levels of attitude toward high levels of attitude toward online travel shopping
online travel shopping. At low levels of attitude, however, (Goldsmith, 2001). Compared with invested resources,
there was much difference in intention to purchase for high the effects of marketing strategy enforcing targeted online
and low personal innovativeness travelers. travelers’ attitude are greater for less innovative travelers
rather than for high innovative travelers. Although this was
6. Discussion somewhat different from the finding of earlier works
(Agarwal & Prasad, 1998; Shim et al., 2001), this finding
The main focus of this study was to examine how suggests that less innovative online travelers may be a good
travelers’ innate innovativeness affects the traveler’s online target market for online travel marketers, if they have a
shopping behavior. Specifically, it has been tested whether favorable attitude toward online travel shopping.
the impact of attitude and subjective norm on the traveler’s The results also suggested that the impact of subjective
shopping intention is related to personal innovativeness, by norm on intention to search is influenced by online
using Ajzen and Fishbein’s (1980) reasoned action theory travelers’ innovativeness, while subjective norm and
as a theoretical background. personal innovativeness did not interact to predict the
To begin with, this study revealed that among the online travelers’ intention to purchase. The relationship
control variables, age and education were important between subjective norm and intention to search was
demographic variables in the intention to search model, negative at high levels of personal innovativeness, while it
and education was the only significant predictor in the was positive at low levels of personal innovativeness. This
intention to purchase model. Thus, based on the findings of finding shows that online travelers with high levels of
the relationship between online purchasers’ demographics innovativeness place less reliance on social information in
and their intention to search and intention to purchase, the process of searching the travel-related products online.
online travel marketers could identify attractive and
potential niche market segments. They could target 7. Contributions and implications
relatively younger and more educated online travelers,
though demographics alone are not enough for market The main contribution of this study is the examination of
segmentation (Bellman et al., 1999; Bonn et al., 1998). the moderating effect of personal innovativeness on the
Regarding average effects, attitude was the only sig- online purchase decision-making process. This study
nificant predictor in explaining online travelers’ intention presents explicit evidence suggesting that the impacts of
to search, while both attitude and subjective norm were attitude and subjective norm on online travelers’ shopping
statistically significant antecedents of online travelers’ intention depend largely on online travelers’ innovative
intention to purchase. This suggests that of the variables predisposition. The results provide meaningful insight into
measured, online travelers rely mainly on a level of attitude why not all travelers show the same level of interest in
toward online travel shopping in forming their searching shopping travel products online, even when they have the
intention; while they also consider referents’ opinions (i.e., same level of positive attitude and the referral’s opinion.
family and friends) to be an important source when they Based on the results, more specialized service strategies
would like to purchase travel-related products online. could be implemented in terms of travelers’ innovative
Otherwise stated, at low levels of uncertainty, online level.
travelers are mainly influenced by their levels of attitude, The findings of this study also provide some important
while they rely on both attitude and the referrals to cope practical implications for online travel marketers. First, in
with higher levels of uncertainty, given that purchasing order to encourage online travelers to blend online travel
intention has higher levels of uncertainty than searching shopping into their daily buying activities, online travel
intention (Shim et al., 2001). marketers should principally focus both on increasing
This finding, however, should be tempered by the fact targeted online travelers’ attitude and fostering the
that the impact of attitude and subjective norm on online referents’ opinions. Although the referents’ positive opi-
travelers’ shopping intention can be affected by the degree nions can be utilized to fortify online travelers’ purchasing
of online travelers’ inherent personal innovativeness intention; for more effective marketing results, online
(Beldona et al., 2004; Klein et al., 2004; Sigala, 2004). travel marketers should apply a marketing strategy
The results showed that personal innovativeness would targeting online travelers’ attitude toward online travel
interact with attitude to influence intention to search and shopping. Thus, it is suggested that online travel marketers
intention to purchase. Overall, the greater the level of provide critically desired utilities related to online travel
online traveler’s innovativeness, the greater was the like- shopping (e.g., convenience, contents, cost saving, and
lihood that attitude would lead to higher intention to privacy). If online marketing communications could enable
search and intention to purchase the travel-related travelers to focus on such benefits of online shopping, the
products online. In addition, the results showed that in propensity to shop for travel products and services online
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897 895

would increase (Athiyaman, 2002; Beldona et al., 2005). conditions in other countries. Thus, future research can
Another way to foster online travelers’ affective attitude further examine how the availability of requisite resources
toward online shopping is to promote differences in online and opportunities (e.g., such as Internet access or e-
travelers’ daily buying choices. Through participation in commerce penetration rate) influences the online purchas-
site design and operation, online travelers should be able to ing behavior process. In so doing, future research can
fully recognize the key aspects of a given online shopping compare online travelers’ shopping behavior paradigm
service (Goldsmith, 2001). Especially, online travel market- between different online market situations.
ers have to shift their focus from attraction through ease of
function to retention through relevant and valuable
Appendix. Scales and items
information as travelers experience online shopping.
Second, online travel businesses’ social influence market-
ing strategies should be tailored based on online travelers’ Attitude (adapted from Taylor and Todd 1995)
level of innovativeness. That is, for online travelers with AT 1. Online shopping is a good idea.
low innovativeness, more personalized social information AT 2. Online shopping is a wise idea.
such as the referents’ buying choices should be weighted as AT 3. I like the idea of online shopping.
a suitable marketing way, since they are more open to AT 4. Online shopping would be pleasant.
social influence than high innovative travelers (Khalifa &
Limayem, 2003). Conversely, for online travelers with high Subjective norm (adapted from Taylor and Todd 1995)
innovativeness, an indirect mass-media style approach SN 1. People who influence my behavior would think
should be explored so that it can be perceived to be less that I should shop online.
influential on shopping behavior, given that they are less SN 2. People who are important to me would think
motivated to comply with the referents in making their that I should shop online
buying decisions. In addition, compared to less innovative Personal innovativeness (adapted from Agarwal and Prasad
online travelers, innovative online travelers tend to be less- 1998)
price sensitive (Goldsmith, 2001). Thus, rather than a PI 1. If I heard about a new technology, I would
money-saving approach, non-monetary benefits could be look for ways to experiment with it.
highlighted as a more effective marketing approach to high PI 2. Among my peers, I am usually the first to try
innovative online travelers. Lastly, high innovative trave- out new information technologies.
lers can be a clear target market for new product and high PI 3. In general, I am hesitant to try out new
complex travel products such as cruises or vacation travel information technologies.a
packages (Beldona et al., 2005; Christou et al., 2004), since PI 4. I like to experiment with new information
they are more willing to take risks and purchase travel technologies.
products online earlier than less innovative travelers.
Intention to search (adapted from Venkatesh and Davis
8. Limitations and future research 2000)
IS 1. I plan to search for travel-related product
It is important to note a few limitations in this study information online in the future.
when interpreting the results. First, this study focused IS 2. I expect my use of the Internet will be to search
solely on innovative predisposition, given that online travel for travel-related product information in the
shopping is more likely to be welcomed by high innovative future.
travelers (Limayem et al., 2000). However, different types Intention to purchase (adapted from Venkatesh and Davis
of individual personality such as opinion leadership or 2000)
shopping orientation could be included in the future IP 1. I plan to purchase travel-related product online
research. Researchers could investigate how those factors in the future.
modify the accepted paradigm for online purchase IP 2. I expect my use of the Internet will be to
behavior. Second, self-reports from the same subjects were purchase travel-related product in the future.
used to gather data. This may introduce the possibility of a
Reverse scaled item.
common method bias, though it is tested by single-factor
solution. Thus, future research could collect dependent
variables and independent variables at different times.
Actual behavioral data on online purchase behavior could References
also be used as a remedy for this common method bias
problem. Third, this study did not take into account the Agarwal, R., & Prasad, P. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition
role of some resource factors relevant for online shopping, of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology.
Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215.
since those conditions were not pertinent to Korea’s online Ahuja, M., Gupta, B., & Raman, P. (2003). An empirical investigation of
market situation. However, different countries may have online consumer purchasing behavior. Communication of the ACM,
particular online market conditions that differ from those 46(12), 145–151.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
896 H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995).
interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Multivariate data analysis (4th ed). London: Prentice-Hall Interna-
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A tional.
theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Im, S., Bayus, B. L., & Mason, C. H. (2003). An empirical study of innate
Bulletin, 84, 888–918. consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and predicting adoption behavior. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1),
social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 61–73.
Anderson, C. H. (1986). Hierarchical moderated regression analysis: A Jones, E., Sundaram, S., & Chin, W. (2002). Factors leading to sales force
useful tool for retail management decisions. Journal of Retailing, 62(2), automation use: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personal Selling &
186–203. Sales Management, 22(3), 145–156.
Athiyaman, A. (2002). Internet users’ intention to purchase air travel Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information
online: An empirical investigation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-
20(4), 234–242. adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213.
Beldona, S., Kline, S., & Morrison, A. M. (2004). Utilitarian value in the Khalifa, M., & Limayem, M. (2003). Drivers of Internet shopping.
Internet: Differences between broadband & narrowband users. Journal Communications of the ACM, 46(12), 233–239.
of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 17(2/3), 63–77. Kim, W. G., & Lee, H. Y. (2004). Comparison of web service quality
Beldona, S., Morrison, A. M., & O’Leary, J. (2005). Online shopping between online travel agencies and online travel suppliers. Journal of
motivations and pleasure travel products: A correspondence analysis. Travel & Tourism Marketing, 17(2/3), 105–116.
Tourism Management, 26(4), 561–570. Klein, S., Köhne, F., & Öörni, A. (2004). Barriers to online booking of
Bellman, S., Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Predictors of online scheduled airline tickets. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 17(2/
buying behavior. Communications of the ACM, 42(12), 32–38. 3), 27–39.
Bhatnagar, A., Misra, S., & Rao, H. R. (2000). On risk, convenience, and Kwak, H., Fox, R. J., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2002). What products can be
Internet shopping behavior. Communications of the ACM, 43(11), successfully promoted and sold via the Internet? Journal of Advertising
98–105. Research, 42(1), 23–38.
Bobbitt, L. M., & Dabholkar, P. A. (2001). Integrating attitudinal theories Lee, M. J., & Back, K-J. (2005). Association members’ meeting
to understand and predict use of technology-based self-service. participation behaviors: An introduction to a meeting participation
International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(5), 423–450. model. Paper presented at the 10th annual graduate conference in
Bonn, M. A., Furr, H. L., & Susskind, A. M. (1998). Using the Internet as hospitality and tourism, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, January 5–7,
a pleasure travel planning tool: An examination of the sociodemo- 2005.
graphic and behavioral characteristics among Internet users and Leonard-Barton, D., & Deschamps, I. (1988). Managerial influence in the
nonusers. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 22(3), 303–317. implementation of new technology. Management Science, 34(10),
Brown, K. M. (1999a). Theory of reasoned action & Theory of planned 1252–1265.
behavior (Online). Available: http://hsc.usf.edu/kmbrown/TRA_TBP_ Limayem, M., Khalifa, M., & Frini, A. (2000). What makes consumers
Interactive_Outline.htm (Feb 14, 2006). buy from Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping. IEEE
Brown, T. J. (1999b). Antecedents of culturally significant tourist Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 30(4), 421–432.
behavior. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(3), 676–700. Machlis, S. (1997). Profits elude travel sites. Computerworld, 32(1), 53–54.
Burns, A. C., & Bush, R. F. (2001). Marketing research (3rd ed). Upper Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior.
Chiu, Y., Lin, C., & Tang, L. (2005). Gender differences: Assessing a Information System Research, 2(3), 173–191.
model of online purchase intentions in e-tail service. International Murphy, J., & Tan, I. (2003). Journey to nowhere? E-mail customer
Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(5), 416–435. service by travel agents in Singapore. Tourism Management, 24(5),
Christou, E., Avdimiotis, S., Kassianidis, P., & Sigala, M. (2004). 543–550.
Examining the factors influencing the adoption of web-based ticketing: National Computerization Agency (2002). 2002 Korea Internet White
Etix and its adopters. In A. J. Frew (Ed.), Information and Paper (Online). Available: http://www.nca.or.kr/white/data/2002en-
communication technologies in Tourism 2004. Vienna, Austria: Spring- gwhite/review.pdf (Oct 13, 2003).
er. Njite, D., & Parsa, H. G. (2004). Structural equation modeling of factors
Corney, M. J., Eves, A., Kipps, M., & Noble, C. (1998). School caters’ that influence consumer purchase intentions on the Internet. Paper
attitudes towards providing healthier menus. International Journal of presented at the 2004 I-CHRIE annual conference and exposition,
Hospitality Management, 17(3), 275–287. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, July 28–31, 2004.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of Nysveen, H. (2003). The importance of risk-reducing value-added services
computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. in online environment: An exploratory study on various segments of
Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. leisure tourism. Information Technology & Tourism, 6(2), 113–127.
Eastin, M. S. (2002). Diffusion of e-commerce: An analysis of the O’Cass, A., & Fenech, T. (2003). Web retailing adoption: Exploring the
adoption of four e-commerce activities. Telematics and Informatics, nature of Internet users web retailing behavior. Journal of Retailing
19(4), 251–267. and Consumer Services, 10(2), 81–94.
Fagerstrøm, A. (2005). The behavioral perspective model: A proposed Oh, H., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2001). Volitional degrees of gambling behaviors.
theoretical framework to understand and predict online consumer Annals of Tourism Research, 28(3), 618–637.
behavior. Paper presented at the EMCIS 2005 annual conference, Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change.
Cairo, Egypt, June 7–8, 2005. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 117–154.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. Piga, C. A., & Filippi, N. (2002). Booking and flying with low-cost
Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. airlines. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(3), 237–249.
Forsythe, S. M., & Shi, B. (2003). Consumer patronage and risk Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational
perceptions in Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4),
56(11), 867–875. 531–544.
Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). Using the domain specific innovativeness scale to Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and
identify innovative Internet consumers. Electronic Networking Appli- effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information
cations and Policy, 11(2), 149–158. Systems, 11(3/4), 271–295.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.Y. Lee et al. / Tourism Management 28 (2007) 886–897 897

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed). New York: The The Korea Travel Times (2001). Click! Favorites! Modetour! (Online).
Free Press. Available: http://traveltimes.co.kr/news/news_tview.asp?idx=21124&-
Ryu, K. & Jang, S. C. (2005). Tourists’ behavioral intention towards local page (Mar 22, 2003).
cuisine: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Paper Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the
presented at the 10th annual graduate conference in hospitality and technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage-
tourism, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, January 5–7, 2005. ment Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Shim, S., Eastlick, M. A., Lotz, S. L., & Warrington, P. (2001). An online Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop
prepurchase intentions model: The role of intention to search. Journal to ask for directions? gender, social Influence, and their role in
of Retailing, 77(3), 397–416. technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1),
Sigala, M. (2004). Reviewing the profile and behavior of Internet users 115–139.
research directions and opportunities in tourism and hospitality. Weber, K., & Roehl, W. S. (1999). Profiling people searching for and
Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 17(2/3), 93–102. purchasing travel products on the World Wide Web. Journal of Travel
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology Research, 37(3), 291–298.
usage: A test of competing models. Information System Research, 6(2), Zhang, Y., & Roseman, M. (2005). Consumers’ likelihood to purchase
144–176. ethnic food when eating out: Factors influencing their decision
Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewé, P. L. (2002). An empirical examination of making. Paper presented at the 10th annual graduate conference in
individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self- hospitality and tourism, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, January 5–7,
efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 381–396. 2005.

You might also like