Hypothesis: ?.

T0 T1 T2
Appearance 7.76 8.28 8.20
Aroma 7.84 8.43 8.26
Crunchiness 8.11 8.58 8.50
Taste 8.01 8.80 8.50
Average 7.93 8.52 8.37

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Varianc
Groups Count Sum Average e
0.02526
Column 1 4 31.72 7.9300 7
0.04922
Column 2 4 34.09 8.5225 5
Column 3 4 33.46 8.3650 0.0249

ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
0.37672 11.3709 0.00344 4.25649
Between Groups 0.75345 2 5 2 1 5
0.29817 0.03313
Within Groups 5 9 1

1.05162
Total 5 11

Interpretation:
In the table above, the computed F value (11.37092) is greater than the critical value (4.256495)
at 0.05 significance level. This showed that there is a high significant difference between treatments.
Hence, the null hypothesis, “??????” is rejected.

LSD:
Compute for LSD: Compare Means:

√
LSD = 2.262 (0. 033131)(
1
80
) T1 vs T2 = 7.93 – 8.52 = 0.59

= 2.262
√√
0.033131
80
= 2.262 0.00 0414
T1 vs T3 = 7.93 – 8.37 = 0.44

= 2.262 (0.020347) T2 vs T3 = 8.52 – 8.37 = 0.15

= 0.0460

Interpretation:
The mean difference between Treatments are greater than the computed LSD which means that
the null hypothesis, “that the means are the same” was rejected. In these treatments, there are very high
significant difference as their means are compared. However, among all those treatments, the mean
difference between T2 and T3 showed the least value, hence, T2 and T3 have the Least Significant
Difference.