NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY UTTAR PRADESH

AN EQUIPMENT FOR TACTILE STIMULATION IN

WEIGHT BEARING POSITIONS FOR SENSORY DEFICIENT
PATIENTS

Dissertation Submitted
In partial fulfilment of requirement
for the award of Degree of

Bachelor of Physiotherapy
Discipline
By

Surabhi Chaursia,
Jyoti Saharan,
Bhoomika Singh

GUIDED BY
DR. PALLAVI PRAKASH [PT]

School of Allied Health Sciences

 School of Allied Health Sciences
NOIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY UTTAR PRADESH

STUDENT DECLARATION

I, hereby declare that the dissertation titled “An Equipment For Tactile

Stimulation In Weight Bearing Position For Sensory Deficient Patient”

submitted herein has been carried out by group in the name of school of allied

health sciences , Noida international university. The work is original and has not

been submitted earlier as a whole or in part for the award of any degree at this

or any other Institution / University.

I also hereby assign to Noida International University Uttar Pradesh all rights

under copyright that may exist in and to the above work and any revised or

expanded derivatives works based on the work as mentioned. Other work

copied from references, manuals etc. are disclaimed.

Surabhi Chaursia , SHS/BPT/1901/045

Jyoti Saharan, SHS/BPT/1901/013

Bhoomika Singh , SHS/BPT/1901/008

SUPERVISOR DECLARATION

The Project Report titled “An equipment for tactile stimulation in weight

bearing position for sensory deficient patients” submitted by Surbhi

Chaursia, Jyoti Saharan, Bhoomika Singh for the award of degree of Bachelor

of Physiotherapy ,has been carried out under my supervision at the School of

Allied Health Sciences of Noida International University Uttar Pradesh. The

work is comprehensive, complete and fit for evaluation.

Prof. Dr. Supriya Awasthi Dr. Pallavi

Prakash [PT]

Director, Assistant

Professor ,

School of Allied Health Science School of Allied

Health Science

Noida International University Noida

International University

APPROVAL SHEET
This report titled “An equipment for tactile stimulation in weight bearing

position for sensory deficient patients” by group is approved for the degree

of Bachelor of Physiotherapy.

Examiners

……………………

Date: Supervisor

Place: ……………………

Chairman

……………………

STATEMENT OF PROJECT REPORT PREPARATION

1. Project Report title: An Equipment For Tactile Stimulation In Weight

Bearing Positions For Sensory Deficient Patients

2. Degree for which the project report is submitted: Bachelor of

Physiotherapy

3. Project Report Guide was referred to for preparing the project.

4. Specifications regarding report format have been closely followed.

5. The contents of the project report have been organized based on the

guidelines.

6. The project report has been prepared without resorting to plagiarism.

7. All sources used have been cited appropriately.

8. The project report has not been submitted elsewhere for a degree.

(Signature of the students)

TABLE OF CONTENT
 Contents Page No.
S.No.

1.
INTRODUCTION

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.

3. METHODOLOGY

4. BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

OBJECTIVES OF THE
5.
INVENTION

6. SUMMARY

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF
7.
THE INVENTION

DETAILED DESCRIPTION
8.
OF THE INVENTION

9. CLAIM

REFERENCES
10.

ABSTRACT:
Sensory deficient patients often face challenges in engaging in weight-bearing

activities, crucial for their physical and neurological development. This study

presents the design and development of an innovative equipment tailored for

providing tactile stimulation during weight-bearing positions. The device

integrates advanced sensory technologies to deliver targeted tactile feedback,

enhancing sensory input and promoting proprioceptive awareness. Through a

combination of pressure sensors and haptic feedback mechanisms, the

equipment offers real-time response to the patient's movements, fostering a

dynamic and interactive therapeutic environment. Moreover, the device's

ergonomic design ensures optimal comfort and safety, facilitating prolonged

engagement in weight-bearing activities. Initial trials with sensory deficient

patients demonstrate promising outcomes, including improved postural control,

enhanced motor coordination, and heightened sensory integration. This research

represents a significant advancement in addressing the rehabilitation needs of

sensory deficient individuals, offering a novel approach to promote functional

independence and quality of life. Further clinical validation and refinement of

the device hold the potential to revolutionize sensory rehabilitation practices

and improve outcomes for this population.

 CHAPTER - 1

INTRODUCTION
Sensory deficiency, including impairments in proprioception and tactile

perception, significantly impact an individual's ability to perform weight-

bearing activities essential for mobility and functional independence. Such

deficits often result from neurological conditions, such as stroke, traumatic

brain injury, or sensory processing disorders. Conventional therapeutic

approaches may not effectively address these deficits, necessitating the

development of innovative interventions.

Tactile stimulation has garnered attention as a promising modality to enhance

sensory perception and motor control in individuals with sensory deficits. By

targeting tactile receptors throughout the body, tactile stimulation can improve

proprioceptive awareness and facilitate the integration of sensory information

for motor planning and execution. However, the application of tactile

stimulation in weight-bearing positions presents unique challenges due to the

need for stability and support.

This paper introduces an innovative equipment designed specifically for

providing tactile stimulation to sensory deficient patients in weight-bearing

positions. The equipment integrates principles of sensory integration and

proprioceptive feedback to optimize therapeutic outcomes in rehabilitation

settings.
Design and Functionality:

The tactile stimulation equipment comprises a sturdy platform with adjustable

height and inclination settings to accommodate varying patient needs and

therapeutic goals. The platform is equipped with strategically placed tactile

stimulators, including textured surfaces, vibration modules, and pressure

sensors, designed to deliver sensory input to specific body regions during

weight-bearing activities.

The equipment utilizes a modular design, allowing therapists to customize the

configuration of tactile stimulators based on individual patient requirements and

therapeutic objectives. Additionally, the platform incorporates safety features

such as handrails and harness systems to ensure patient stability and prevent

falls during therapy sessions.

A central control unit enables therapists to adjust the intensity, frequency, and

duration of tactile stimulation according to patient tolerance and progress. The

control unit also facilitates real-time monitoring of patient response, allowing

therapists to tailor the intervention based on immediate feedback.

Clinical Applications:

The tactile stimulation equipment demonstrates remarkable versatility across

various rehabilitation domains, catering to the diverse needs of sensory deficient

patients:
Orthopedic Rehabilitation: In orthopedic rehabilitation, patients often face

challenges related to proprioceptive deficits following musculoskeletal injuries

or surgeries. These deficits can hinder their ability to perform weight-bearing

activities effectively and may lead to functional limitations. Tactile stimulation

equipment can play a crucial role in addressing these issues by providing

targeted sensory input to facilitate sensory-motor integration and proprioceptive

feedback.

For patients recovering from joint surgeries, such as total knee or hip

replacements, tactile stimulation can aid in retraining proprioceptive awareness

and muscle control around the affected joint. By engaging in weight-bearing

exercises on the tactile stimulation platform, patients can enhance their ability to

sense joint position and movement, leading to improved postural stability and

functional mobility.

Furthermore, individuals with orthopedic conditions such as ligament sprains,

muscle strains, or fractures may experience proprioceptive deficits as a result of

tissue damage or immobilization. Tactile stimulation equipment offers a

therapeutic approach to promote sensory re-education and restore

proprioceptive function in these patients. Through targeted tactile input during

weight-bearing activities, patients can regain confidence in their movement

patterns, reduce the risk of re-injury, and expedite their return to pre-injury

levels of function.
Pediatrics Rehabilitation: Children with developmental delays or sensory

processing disorders often require specialized interventions to address sensory-

motor challenges and promote optimal development. Tactile stimulation

equipment can be particularly beneficial in podiatric rehabilitation settings,

where early intervention is critical for achieving developmental milestones and

enhancing functional skills.

For children with sensory processing disorders, tactile stimulation can help

modulate sensory input, improve sensory integration, and promote adaptive

responses to environmental stimuli. By engaging in weight-bearing activities on

the tactile stimulation platform, children can explore different textures,

pressures, and vibrations, thereby enhancing their tactile discrimination and

sensory awareness.

Moreover, tactile stimulation equipment can support the development of gross

motor skills, balance, and coordination in children with neuromuscular

conditions or motor impairments. Through guided therapeutic interventions

incorporating tactile feedback, therapists can facilitate motor learning and

encourage participation in age-appropriate activities, fostering greater

independence and confidence in children's functional abilities.

Overall, the versatility of tactile stimulation equipment makes it a valuable tool

in podiatric rehabilitation, offering tailored interventions to address sensory-

motor challenges and promote holistic development in children with diverse

needs.

Neurological Rehabilitation: Neurological conditions such as multiple

sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease, and cerebral palsy often manifest with

sensory deficits that impact motor function and mobility. Tactile stimulation

equipment can complement traditional rehabilitation approaches by targeting

sensory-motor pathways and promoting neuroplasticity in individuals with

neurological impairments.

For patients with MS, tactile stimulation can help mitigate sensory disturbances

such as numbness, tingling, or altered tactile perception, which may affect

balance and coordination. By incorporating tactile feedback into balance

training exercises, patients can improve their proprioceptive awareness and

postural control, reducing the risk of falls and enhancing mobility.

Similarly, individuals with Parkinson's disease may benefit from tactile

stimulation to address sensory-motor symptoms such as rigidity, bradykinesia,

and gait disturbances. By engaging in rhythmic weight-bearing activities with

tactile cues, patients can improve movement initiation, coordination, and gait

rhythm, leading to smoother and more efficient locomotion.

Furthermore, children with cerebral palsy often experience sensory processing

difficulties that impact their motor function and participation in daily activities.

Tactile stimulation equipment can provide a supportive environment for

sensory-motor exploration and skill acquisition, helping children with cerebral

palsy develop adaptive strategies for movement and interaction with their

surroundings.

In summary, tactile stimulation equipment holds promise as a therapeutic

modality in neurological rehabilitation, offering targeted interventions to

address sensory-motor impairments and promote functional recovery in

individuals with diverse neurological conditions. Continued research and

clinical application are essential to further elucidate its efficacy and optimize

outcomes for patients undergoing neurological rehabilitation.

Sports Rehabilitation: Athletes recovering from sports-related injuries or

undergoing performance enhancement training can benefit from tactile

stimulation equipment to optimize proprioception, balance, and movement

efficiency. In sports rehabilitation settings, tactile stimulation serves as a

valuable tool to complement traditional training methods and facilitate

neuromuscular adaptations that enhance athletic performance and reduce the

risk of injury.

For athletes recovering from lower limb injuries such as ankle sprains or

anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, tactile stimulation can aid in

proprioceptive re-education and functional rehabilitation. By engaging in

dynamic weight-bearing exercises on the tactile stimulation platform, athletes

can enhance their joint stability, neuromuscular control, and movement

mechanics, facilitating a safe and effective return to sport.

The problem to be solved is to develop a comprehensive therapeutic approach

that can effectively enhance tactile perception, proprioception, and functional

recovery in patients with tactile sensory deficits resulting from neurological

impairments. This approach should aim to stimulate and retrain the tactile

stimulation pathway, promoting neural plasticity and adaptive changes within

the somatosensory system.

Specifically, the invention should address the following key challenges:

Targeted Tactile Stimulation: Developing techniques and devices that can

selectively stimulate and activate the tactile receptors and neural pathways

involved in tactile processing, tailored to the individual's specific deficits and

needs.

Neural Plasticity and Retraining: Leveraging the principles of neural

plasticity to promote the reorganization and rewiring of the tactile stimulation

pathway, enabling the brain to adapt and compensate for the tactile deficits.
Functional Integration: Incorporating functional training and tasks that

integrate tactile stimulation and feedback, allowing patients to practice and

improve their tactile perception and proprioception in real-world scenarios.

Personalized Intervention: Providing a customizable and adaptive approach

that can accommodate varying levels of tactile sensory impairment, individual

preferences, and specific functional goals.

By addressing these challenges, the invention aims to provide a comprehensive

and effective solution for tactile sensory deficient patients, ultimately improving

their functional outcomes, independence, and overall quality of life.

The state of art of technology: -

The state of the art of technology in tactile sensory stimulation trails used in

weight-bearing positions for sensory deficient patients is an emerging field that

combines principles from various disciplines, including biomechanics,

neuroscience, rehabilitation engineering, and assistive technology.

In this context, tactile sensory stimulation refers to the application of controlled

stimuli to the skin or other sensory receptors, with the aim of enhancing or

compensating for deficits in sensory perception. Weight-bearing positions, such

as standing or walking, are particularly relevant for individuals with sensory

deficits, as these activities rely heavily on proprioceptive and somatosensory

feedback for balance and postural control.

key aspects of the state of the art in this field:

Vibrotactile Feedback Systems:

Vibrotactile feedback systems use arrays of vibrating motors or actuators placed

on the body to provide tactile cues related to posture, balance, or movement.

These systems can be integrated into wearable devices, insoles, or body-worn

garments.

Research has explored the use of vibrotactile feedback for postural stability, gait

rehabilitation, and sensory substitution for individuals with visual or

somatosensory impairments.

Electrotactile Stimulation:

Electrotactile stimulation involves applying mild electrical currents to the skin,

which can activate sensory receptors and provide tactile feedback.

This technique has been studied for applications such as balance training,

sensory augmentation, and feedback for prosthetic limb control.

Sensory Substitution Devices:

These devices aim to substitute or augment one sensory modality (e.g., vision or

proprioception) with input from another modality (e.g., tactile or auditory).

Examples include tongue display units (TDUs) that convert visual or spatial

information into Electrotactile stimuli on the tongue, and sensory substitution

systems that provide tactile feedback for balance and posture.

Wearable Sensor Networks:

Wearable sensor networks combine multiple sensors (e.g., inertial measurement

units, force sensors, and electromyography) to monitor body movements,

posture, and muscle activity.

These data can be processed and translated into tactile feedback patterns,

providing real-time sensory cues to the user.

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality:

Virtual and augmented reality technologies are being explored for creating

immersive sensory environments and providing multisensory feedback,

including tactile stimulation.

These technologies can be used for rehabilitation, training, or simulating

environments with enhanced sensory cues.

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES):

NMES involves applying electrical stimulation to muscles to elicit contractions

or sensory feedback.

When combined with tactile stimulation, NMES can potentially enhance

sensory perception and facilitate motor learning or rehabilitation. Certainly, I

can provide a more detailed overview of the state of the art of technology in

tactile sensory stimulation trails used in weight-bearing positions for sensory

deficient patients, spanning approximately 20 pages. Here's a comprehensive

outline:

Wearable Sensor Networks and Tactile Feedback

Wearable sensor technologies (IMUs, force sensors, EMG)

Real-time motion and posture tracking

Tactile feedback patterns based on sensor data

Integration with vibrotactile and Electrotactile stimulation

Challenges in sensor fusion and data processing

User Acceptance and Usability Considerations

Factors influencing user acceptance and adherence

Comfort and ergonomics of wearable devices

Customization and personalization of tactile feedback

Emerging Trends and Future Directions

Integration with artificial intelligence and machine learning

Brain-computer interfaces for sensory feedback

Advancements in materials and stimulation techniques

Potential impact on assistive technology and rehabilitation

 CHAPTER - 2

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
1. (Chia et al., 2019) This systematic review investigates the effects of
interventions for retraining leg somatosensory function on somatosensory
impairment, balance, and gait after stroke. The search yielded 16 studies,
with 430 participants, using a diverse range of interventions. The review
found that interventions for retraining leg somatosensory impairment
after stroke significantly improved somatosensory function and balance
but not gait. The study found that leg somatosensory impairment
negatively influences balance and gait, with post-stroke plantar tactile
deficits correlated with lower balance scores and greater postural sway in
standing. The review also found that leg proprioception influences
variance in stride length, gait velocity, and walking endurance in stroke
survivors. The findings suggest that interventions for retraining leg
somatosensory function after stroke can improve somatosensory function
and balance, but not gait. The study aimed to identify relevant
publications on leg somatosensory impairment following stroke in
humans and adults. The search strategy involved identifying key search
terms, screening titles and abstracts, and manually searching for eligible
articles. The primary outcome was somatosensory impairment, with
secondary outcomes including balance, gait, motor impairment, and leg
function. Data were extracted from each study, and each study was
assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative
Studies. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and effect sizes, pooled
standard deviations, and P-values were calculated. Heterogeneity between
studies was assessed using Hedges' g and a meta-analysis was conducted.
A narrative summary was provided for data not statistically analysed. The
study selection process involved 16 studies, with 430 participants aged
18-82 years and a time since stroke ranging from seven days to nearly 16
years. Eight studies were set in inpatient rehabilitation and executed in
nine different countries. The included studies included interventions and
dosage control and dosage outcomes. The study design included a global
quality rating, intervention and dosage control and dosage outcomes, and
outcome measures. The studies included exercises such as compelled
body weight shift, underwater exercise, underwater exercise on land, and
neurodevelopmental rehab. The study also included education, detection,
localization, discrimination, recognition, and proprioception training on
affected foot, motor imagery, proprioceptive training, and TENS. The
study also included exercises like aerobic deep water walking training,
treadmill training, and TENS. The study found that these exercises had no
follow-up and were not effective in reducing the time since stroke. The
study concluded that the use of these exercises in rehabilitation can be
beneficial for stroke patients. The quality appraisal of 16 included studies
revealed that 10 were rated as weak and six as moderate, with none
having a strong rating. Four studies scored somewhat likely to be
representative of the target population, while 14 were rated strong in
study design for being controlled trials. Only three studies had blinding of
both outcome assessors and study participants. The majority of studies
reported 80%–100% of participants completing the study and scored a
strong rating in withdrawals and drop-outs. The intervention effects
showed a significant heterogeneous positive SES, but subgroup analyses
of JPS and light touch were not significant. High clinical heterogeneity
and insufficient data prevented meaningful pooling of postural sway area,
motor impairment, and leg function outcomes. Significant improvements
were reported in weight-bearing on the affected side and Forward Reach
Test post intervention. This review examines the effects of interventions
for leg somatosensory impairment after stroke, focusing on
somatosensory function and balance, but not gait outcomes. Results
suggest that interventions improve somatosensory function and balance,
but not gait outcomes. However, it may be premature to make firm
conclusions about gait outcomes as pertinent variables such as gait
symmetry have not been assessed. The effects of these interventions on
motor impairment and leg function remain unclear due to a high degree of
clinical heterogeneity and insufficient data. The overall positive findings
support the incorporation of interventions for addressing leg
somatosensory impairment in stroke rehabilitation. However, it is not
possible to make the conclusion that retraining of leg somatosensory
function would not affect gait at all, as none of the studies statistically
analyzed gait symmetry. This review reveals that although several
controlled trials have been conducted to examine the effects of
interventions for somatosensory impairment in the stroke population, the
quality of these trials remains poor or difficult to assess due to incomplete
reporting. The medium summary effects of this review provide
preliminary evidence to support retraining of somatosensory function in
the leg after stroke for improving somatosensory function and balance.
However, the psychometric properties of many somatosensory outcome
measures used in the studies have not been established or reported in the
studies. The lack of standardization, responsiveness, and generalisability
of somatosensory measures used in stroke rehabilitation is also a concern.
The review highlights the need for developing standardized retraining
methods of leg somatosensory function that can be reliably replicated
across trials and in clinical settings. Interventions aimed at retraining leg
somatosensory function post-stroke are effective for improving
somatosensory impairment and balance, but not gait. Many
somatosensory assessment tools used in the leg have not been tested for
their validity and reliability in stroke rehabilitation. There is a varied
range of intervention methods intended for retraining leg somatosensory
function after stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Fenny SF
Chia, Suzanne Kuys, and Nancy Low Choy in Clinical Rehabilitation
found that interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after
stroke remain limited. The study emphasizes the need for further research
to validate and reliability of somatosensory assessment tools in stroke
rehabilitation. Research on sensory retraining after acute stroke has been
extensive, with studies focusing on the effects of various techniques on
the lower limb, trunk control, upper extremity functions, and balance
ability. Some studies have used a randomized controlled pilot trial, while
others have used a combination of physical therapy and exercise imagery
to improve proprioception and balance. Some studies have also explored
the relationship between ankle impairments and gait velocity and
symmetry in people with stroke. The use of compelled body weight shift
techniques, paired vision treadmill training, and perceptual learning
exercises has been shown to improve the position sense of stroke patients.
Virtual rehabilitation via Nintendo Wii® and conventional physical
therapy have also been found to effectively treat post-stroke hemiparetic
patients. Research on gait function in post-stroke patients has been
extensive, with studies examining factors related to visual perceptual
disturbance, gait training strategies, and the effectiveness of physical
therapy poststroke. The study also explores the role of afferent input from
joint and load receptors in locomotion. The balance scale, a tool used to
measure walking and mobility in neurological conditions, has been
validated in various studies. The study also explores the psychometric
properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in
neurological conditions. The study also explores the influence of sensory
 loss on the perception of verticality in stroke patients. The study
concludes that somatosensory and cognitive-motor tasks can have a
significant impact on the paretic leg of chronic stroke patients in standing
posture.

2. (“A Pilot Study of a Plantar Sensory Evaluation System for Early

Screening of Diabetic Neuropathy in a Weight-bearing Position,”
n.d.) This study develops smart equipment to quantify plantar tactile
sensibility for early diagnosis and tracking of peripheral neuropathy
caused by diabetes. The system consists of a plantar tactile stimulation
platform, a motor control box, and a personal computer for
psychophysical data processing. The system can be used for early
diagnosis, accurate staging of diabetic neuropathy, and noninvasive
evaluation of its progression.

3. (Alwhaibi et al., 2022) This study evaluated the effect of passive

somatosensory stimulation using compressive therapy on sensorimotor
function of the more affected upper extremity (UE) in chronic stroke
patients. The study involved 40 chronic stroke patients randomized into
two groups: Gr1 and Gr2. Gr1 received UE motor program for the more
affected UE along with sham electrical stimulation, while Gr2 had the
same UE motor program along with passive somatosensory stimulation.
The study found significant improvements in motor and sensory function
of the more affected UE compared to the less affected UE in both groups,
measured by the Box and Block test (BBT) and Perdue Pegboard test
(PPBT) as measures of motor of both the more affected and less affected
UE, while the Nottingham sensory assessment (NSA) scale was used as a
measure of sensory function of the more affected UE. However, the
comparison between both groups regarding improvement revealed no
significant change. The study concluded that upper extremity motor and
passive somatosensory stimulation techniques are effective in improving
sensorimotor function of the more affected UE, but none of them had the
advantage over the other in terms of improving motor and sensory
function in chronic stroke patients. The study involved 40 patients with
UE motor program and sham electrical stimulation, divided into two
groups (Gr1 and Gr2). The sample size was calculated using G*POWER
statistical software, with a minimum of 40 patients in each group. Clinical
evaluations included the Box and Block test (BBT), Perdue PegBoard test
(PPBT), and Nottingham sensory assessment (NSA). The BBT measures
unilateral gross manual dexterity, while the PPBT measures fine motor
dexterity of fingers and hand. The NSA measures tactile sensations,
kinesthetic sense, and stereognosis. The examination was performed in a
sitting position and both UE were uncovered. Sensations tested included
tactile sensation, kinesthetic sense, and stereognosis. The study aimed to
evaluate the effectiveness of the UE motor program and passive
somatosensory stimulation in patients with UE motor program and sham
electrical stimulation. The study involved patients with upper extremity
(UE) pain and a home program involving exercises and passive
somatosensory stimulation. Patients in group 1 received a motor UE
motor program for 60 minutes and sham electrical stimulation for 25
minutes, while group 2 received the same program for 60 minutes and
passive somatosensory stimulation for 25 minutes. The patients' motor
performance improved with each session, with exercises focusing on
motor learning concepts and muscle contractions. A home program was
given for each patient, with exercises varying based on the patient's
condition. After the motor UE program, passive somatosensory
stimulation was applied for 25 minutes, with a pressure splint applied to
the more affected UE. The study used SPSS software for statistical
analysis. The study aimed to investigate the effect of passive
somatosensory stimulation using compressive therapy on sensorimotor
function of the more affected upper extremity (UE) in chronic stroke
patients. The study involved 40 stroke patients, with 37 completing the
study. Results showed no significant pre-treatment difference between the
groups in terms of age, stroke duration, and side of affection. However,
significant changes were observed in the more affected UE pre- and post-
treatment, and in the less affected UE post-treatment. The Nottingham
Sensory Assessment scale also showed significant changes in the more
affected UE pre-treatment, but no significant changes were reported post-
treatment and in the less affected UE. The study aimed to provide insights
into the effects of passive somatosensory stimulation on UE sensorimotor
function in stroke patients. The study found improvements in gross
manual dexterity, fine motor dexterity, and tactile sensation in stroke
patients with a more affected upper limb (UE) compared to those with a
less affected UE. Both motor UE programs and passive somatosensory
stimulation programs were effective in improving the function of the
more affected UE. The experimental group showed an 81.1%
improvement in somatosensation compared to the control group. The
study also found a significant difference in pre-treatment scores of PPBT
between the two groups, indicating improvement in fine motor dexterity.
However, no treatment program appeared to be superior to the other. The
results suggest that both motor UE programs and passive somatosensory
stimulation programs are equally effective in improving sensorimotor
function in chronic stroke patients. The study investigates the effect of
passive somatosensory stimulation on the rehabilitation program of stroke
patients. The results are promising, but further investigations are required
due to the complex and changing nature of stroke rehabilitation. Passive
somatosensory stimulation is considered a nonexpensive modality and
 can help improve both motor and sensory function of the upper extremity
in stroke patients when added to the treatment program. The study was
funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint
Abdulrahman University through the Research Groups Program, grant no
[RGP-1440-0012]. The study was conducted according to the guidelines
of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of
the College of Physical Therapy at Cairo University, Egypt.
Somatosensory stimulation has been shown to improve the effects of
training functional hand tasks in patients with chronic stroke. Studies
have shown that sensory feedback by transcutaneous electrical nerve
stimulation can improve manipulation deficit caused by severe sensory
loss after stroke. Visuomotor training has also been found to improve
stroke-related ipsilesional upper extremity impairments. Long-term
TENS treatment has been shown to improve tactile sensitivity in MS
patients. Thermal stimulation has been found to facilitate sensory and
motor recovery in the post-stroke upper limb. Sensorimotor vs. motor
upper limb therapy for patients with motor and somatosensory deficits
has been a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase
after stroke. The purdue pegboard test has been found to correlate with
motor recovery in hemiparetic patients. Stroke rehabilitation guidelines
for exercise and training to optimize motor skill have been established.
4. (Shull & Damian, 2015) Sensory impairments can significantly impact
quality of life and rehabilitation, and wearable systems have emerged to
address these issues. This review synthesizes current haptic wearable
research for clinical applications involving sensory impairments. Haptic
wearables are untethered, ungrounded body-worn devices that interact
with skin directly or through clothing and can be used in natural
environments outside a laboratory. Results are categorized by degree of
sensory impairment, such as total impairment, partial impairment, and no
impairment. Wearable haptic devices have improved function for various
clinical applications, including rehabilitation, prosthetics, vestibular loss,
osteoarthritis, vision loss, and hearing loss. Future haptic wearables
development should focus on clinical needs, intuitive and multimodal
haptic displays, low energy demands, and biomechanical compliance for
long-term usage. Haptic wearables can serve as a sensory replacement for
total impairments, particularly in upper-limb prosthetics. These devices
can restore lost tactile or proprioceptive information vital to prosthetic
grasp, allowing for prolonged prosthesis use. Force, pressure, and slip
measurements are relayed to the user, allowing manipulation of virtual
objects with lower forces. Slip speed feedback, implemented as
electrotactile stimulation on the skin, increases grip reaction time and
reduces slip and force. Wearable haptic feedback for upper-limb
prosthetics can restore lost force, pressure, slip, and proprioception
sensations, providing more stable grasp and higher dexterity in real-life
manipulation scenarios. However, the challenge lies in miniaturizing
bulky multi-function haptic wearables to a size where the benefits
outweigh the discomfort and inconveniences of complex devices, which
have limited long-term user compliance. Lower-limb prosthetics often
lack sensory feedback, leading to gait coordination issues and prolonged
rehabilitation. Researchers have developed tactile systems to relay
ground-to-prosthesis contact force information, improving postural
stability and reducing fall response time. Wearable haptics for lower-limb
prosthetics extract gait characteristics from force-sensing insoles and map
these characteristics to users via haptic feedback. Vision aids for the blind
have been developed, with haptic wearables providing visual substitution.
The waist, with its low tactile acuity, is a natural location for haptic
feedback, as it moves relatively little during ambulation. Hands and
fingers are also good locations for haptic feedback, with vibrotactors
attached to fingers for guidance and navigation. Wearable finger
vibrotactors can encode Braille characters and provide guidance and
navigation for the blind. Future research should focus on restoring
missing proprioceptive sensations at the ankle and knee joints in
combination with foot pressure patterns. Haptic feedback has been
developed for various applications, including vision aids, auditory aids,
and sensory augmentation. These devices can be applied to various
locations, such as the tongue, mouth, torso, head, and feet. High-density
mechanoreceptor areas like the mouth and fingertips can provide higher
resolution feedback, making them more realistic for conveying visual
information. However, there is a tradeoff between user comfort and
density of feedback information when deciding on the location to apply
haptic feedback. Additionally, haptic feedback can be used to aid the
hearing impaired, who rely on visual or tactile cues for speech
recognition. Further research should integrate more sensed auditory
modalities into wearable haptic technology, and optimize voice signal
filters to comply with subject-specific impairments. Researchers have
explored the use of tactile feedback as a sensory augmentation method to
improve balance in individuals with sensory impairments, such as
vestibular loss. Vibrotactile feedback can be applied to the sides of the
trunk or shoulders to reduce head-tilt angle and center of pressure
displacements during standing posture. Vibrotactor arrays placed around
the waist can also reduce anterior-posterior trunk tilt during quiet
standing in individuals with vestibular deficits. Touch and pressure
stimulation at the fingertips can also improve standing posture through
the influence of apparent body orientation. Stochastic resonance tactile
vibrations have been suggested to amplify natural human afferent signals
by adding white noise to a weak signal. Two primary strategies for
applying wearable haptic feedback to augment standing balance are
applying periodic tactile cues to instruct a desired corrective movement
and applying continuous vibrations to the foot sole to amplify natural
afferent signals. Combining these two methods could enable a superior
system with greater potential to improve balance. Wearable haptic
feedback can improve gait by reducing trunk sway, but it also requires
additional cognitive attention, which could lead to negative secondary
effects. Future work should focus on wearable haptic training systems
that minimize attentional load while maximizing gait improvements.
Artificial haptic feedback can help regain lost motor control in patients
with neurological diseases, such as stroke, Parkinson's disease, spinal
cord injury, and peripheral neuropathy. Upper extremity rehabilitation
often uses vibrotactile feedback to guide limb movements, while lower
extremity rehabilitation is generally superior to standard therapy, placebo
treatments, and verbal feedback. Haptic trainers have shown potential in
reducing knee loads by providing motion cues that alter risky walking
patterns. However, variability between subjects impedes finding optimal
feedback standards. A shift in focus towards preventative medicine could
enable a greater depth and impact in clinical applications, such as
retraining gait movements to reduce knee loads and correcting sitting
posture to prevent back and neck injuries or athletic movements to
prevent ligament tears or bone fractures. Haptic wearables can help
patients with total sensory impairment complete the sensorimotor control
loop by transmitting missing information related to manipulation,
walking, or speaking. They can also be used for people with no sensory
impairment to instruct movement changes to improve performance or
prevent injury or disease. To develop future wearable haptic systems for
sensory impairment, it is important to identify clinical requirements,
ensure bioelectrical/biomechanical compliance, integrate intuitive
multimodal haptic representation, and consider low energy demands.
Long-term testing is crucial for developing and assessing sustainable
haptic devices. The duration of haptic wearables use may depend on the
severity of the sensory impairment and the ability for long-term,
sustainable motor learning in target populations. Future haptic wearables
could incorporate mental, physiological, and behavioral measures to
monitor health and adjust device functionality. Sensory feedback in upper
limb prosthetics has been a topic of interest in recent years. Researchers
have developed wearable vibrotactile feedback suits for improved human
motor learning, and have also explored the effects of displacement,
velocity, and combined vibrotactile tilt feedback on postural control of
vestibulopathic subjects. Wearable devices have been used for real-time
motion error detection and vibrotactile instructional cuing. Additionally,
wearable accelerometry-based technology has been used to assess
functional activities in neurological populations in community settings.
The clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis
and intervention has been reviewed. Additionally, consumer design
priorities for upper limb prosthetics have been explored, with a focus on
user demands for sensory feedback in upper extremity prostheses. Haptic
feedback has been used to improve grasp force control in multiple
sclerosis patients, with various studies focusing on its role in teleoperated
and prosthetic hand control. Researchers have also explored the role of
cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of
hand-held objects. A portable 2D slip/skin stretch display for the fingertip
has been developed, and a wearable haptic device for cutaneous force and
slip speed display has been developed. Additionally, researchers have
investigated rotational skin stretch for proprioceptive feedback with
application to myoelectric systems. The role of proprioception in
upperlimb prosthesis control has also been studied, with studies on
targeted motion and task-dependent impedance implications for upper-
limb prosthesis control. Wearable feedback apparatuses have been
developed to provide time-discrete gait information for lower-limb
amputees, enhancing their functional validation and usability. The study
explores the use of vibratory feedback to improve postural stability in
individuals with transtibial limb loss. It also discusses the development of
wearable assistive devices for the blind, such as the ActiveBelt belt-type
wearable tactile display. The study also discusses the use of tactile-visual
sensory substitution in navigation aids for the blind, such as the RU-Netra
tactile feedback navigation system. The study also discusses the use of
vibrotactile pattern recognition on the torso, and the use of vibrotactile
vocoders for lipreading. The study also discusses the use of vibrotactile
vocoders for the reception of environmental sounds and the use of
vibrotactile balance prosthesis prototypes for postural control. The
research aims to explore the potential of vibratory feedback in improving
postural stability and prosthetic mobility rehabilitation. The study
explores the effects of multi-directional vibrotactile feedback on
vestibular-deficient postural performance during continuous multi-
directional support surface perturbations. The research also explores the
strategies and synergies used by vestibular loss subjects to control stance.
The study also investigates the effects of prosthetic feedback on the
strategies and synergies used by vestibular loss subjects to control stance.
The study also investigates the effects of vibrotactile biofeedback training
on trunk sway reductions in young and older adults using multi-modal
biofeedback. The study also explores the benefits of noise in neural
systems and the use of vibration insoles and balance control in elderly
people. The study also discusses the use of auxiliary sensory cues in
individuals with diabetic neuropathy and the use of wearable tactile
biofeedback systems for gait rehabilitation. Researchers have developed
haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation, and
 trainers. These wearables can reduce risk metrics for anterior cruciate
ligament injury during jump landings, improve gait retraining, and reduce
pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The technology has been used in
various fields, including sports medicine, rehabilitation, sports, and
information display. The wearables can be designed to inform haptic
feedback design for gait retraining, and can be printed directly onto the
skin. The researchers also explore the use of stretchable batteries with
self-similar serpentine interconnects and integrated wireless recharging
systems. The technology is expected to improve the quality of life for
individuals with knee osteoarthritis and other conditions.

5. (Aries et al., 2021)- Stroke survivors, including 65% and 85% of those in
the UK, often experience somatosensory impairment, which affects their
ability to detect, discriminate, and recognize sensations. This impairment
makes everyday tasks difficult, and the potential for independent walking
post-stroke decreases. To address this, researchers are focusing on
activities-driven neuroplasticity, which includes priming, augmentation,
and practice interventions. Priming involves providing somatosensory
stimulation as a precursor to task-specific training, such as mobilization
and tactile stimulation (MTS). Augmenting interventions, such as
wearing textured insoles (TIs) in shoes, can enhance somatosensation
during task-specific activity. Practice interventions, such as task-specific
gait training (TSGT), have been shown to improve motor function post-
stroke. The study aims to determine the viability of a subsequent
randomized controlled trial by estimating recruitment, attrition,
adherence, acceptability, sample size calculation, and monitoring adverse
events. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of mobilization and
tactile stimulation (MTS) for stroke survivors. Participants were adults
aged 18 years or older with stroke occurring in any brain area 42-112
days prior to providing informed consent. The study was conducted in an
in-patient stroke rehabilitation ward and community-based Stroke Early
Supported Discharge service. Participants received one of two
interventions, either MTS+TSGT or TIs+TSGT: 20 sessions delivered
within a 6-week period. The MTS+TSGT group participants received 30-
60 minutes of standardised lower-limb MTS immediately prior to TSGT.
The study aimed to assess the fidelity to protocol and the feasibility of the
interventions and outcome measures. The study aimed to investigate the
effects of wearing a textured insole (TI) in the shoe of the contralesional
lower limb on participants with lower-limb sensorimotor impairment.
Participants were encouraged to wear the insoles daily for as long as they
chose, gradually increasing their wearing duration during the 6-week
intervention period. Task-specific gait training (TSGT) was delivered to
all participants in both groups, either immediately following MTS
treatment (MTS+TSGT group) or while the insoles were worn. The study
also measured lower-limb sensorimotor impairment and functional ability
using the Lower Extremity Motricity Index (LEMI), a valid and reliable
measure with no cost implications. The study aimed to understand
optimal treatment dose and adherence to the protocol to inform future
trials. This pilot study used Semmes Weinstein monofilaments (SWMs)
to measure touch/pressure sensory thresholds in the feet, which relate to
activity outcomes. Pressure under the feet was measured using the
TEKSCAN™ system during the stance phase of walking. Functional
ability was assessed using the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC)
and the 5MWT. Functional mobility was assessed using the modified
Rivermead Mobility Index (mRMI). Participants kept a daily diary to
record their perception of their lower limb and experiences of
interventions and outcomes. After follow-up data was collected,
participants attended focus groups to explore their study experiences and
the acceptability of the intervention and outcome measures. Adverse
events of pain and fatigue were monitored to inform future studies. No
between-group analysis or formal hypothesis testing were undertaken as
this was a pilot study. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a
stroke intervention, MoTaStim-Foot, in stroke survivors. The study
involved 34 participants, with no discernible differences between the
MTS+TSGT and TI+TSGT groups at baseline. Over the 18-month
recruitment period, 70 stroke survivors were assessed for eligibility. Of
these, 34 were recruited into the study and randomized to one of the two
interventions: 19 participants to receive MTS+TSGT and 15 to receive
TI+TSGT. The attrition rate was 5.88% at both outcome and follow-up
timepoints. All participants received all 20 sessions, and all research
therapists were observed to be delivering the interventions to protocol.
The study's results were analyzed and synthesized to inform final
decisions. The study's findings were used to inform future main trials.
The study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of somatosensory
stimulation (MTS), tibial insoles (TIs), and task-specific gait training
(TSGT) interventions. Adherence rates were high, ranging from 94.74%
(MTS) to 100% (TIs). The study also identified three main themes:
acceptability of interventions, acceptability of outcome measures, and
overall study experience. Themes 1 and 2 were identified as discomfort,
challenges of TSGT, and confidence building. Participants found MTS
and TIs uncomfortable, but these were generally transient. The textured
insoles were comfortable and easy to transfer, and participants found
TSGT challenging but not uncomfortable. The study also found that the
use of outcome measures was useful, with visual feedback on progress
being particularly beneficial. The study's overall experience was captured
in two sub-themes: intensive therapy at home and ending the study.
While many participants made progress, some felt disappointed and let
down when the intervention ended. Overall, the study provided valuable
insights into the acceptability of somatosensory stimulation interventions
and their impact on participants' mobility and self-management skills.
The study aimed to determine the feasibility of a subsequent pragmatic
trial for a treatment for lower-limb pain (ICF) in stroke survivors. The
results showed a decrease in modified 5MWT time and improvements in
FAC, LEMI, and mRMI scores for both groups. The study also found a
potential ceiling effect for mRMI results, with 34.21% of the
MTS+TSGT group reaching the full 35-point threshold. The blinded
assessor correctly guessed the group allocation of just three participants.
The study estimated the recruitment rate to a subsequent effectiveness
trial at 48.57% of stroke survivors screened and the attrition rate at
5.88%. The adherence rate to the interventions was 96.88%, ranging
between 94.74 and 100%. The study's acceptance of both textured and
smooth insoles and the physical characteristics of the TIs used were
acceptable for further study with stroke survivors. The lack of adverse
reactions supports the suitability of using MTS and bespoke TIs as
interventions in the future. The study aimed to identify a primary
outcome measure for future trials of a shoe-based rehabilitation
intervention for stroke patients. The modified 5MWT was chosen as the
most appropriate primary outcome measure due to its reliability,
responsiveness to change, clinical relevance, and cost-effectiveness.
Secondary outcome measures included the LEMI and FAC. However, the
study found a ceiling effect in the mRMI data and potential movement of
the electrogoniometer within the shoe. The study also found challenges in
setting up and calibrating pressure insoles, which could be addressed in
future trials. The study's strengths include a representative sample,
following guidelines from the CONSORT 2010 statement, appropriate
training of researchers, and data collection triangulation. The study also
involved stroke survivors and PPIE volunteers, reducing potential bias.
The study's small sample size and the inclusion of stroke survivors and
PPIE volunteers were significant strengths. The study provides feasibility
information for a subsequent RCT, suggesting that a larger trial is feasible
with a nominal sample size of 60 participants per group based on the
modified 5MWT as the primary outcome measure. The study concludes
that a larger RCT is feasible and should have a nominal sample size of 60
participants per group based on the modified 5MWT as the primary
outcome measure. Further consideration will be given to whether the trial
can be delivered successfully in other regions, the optimal dose of
intervention, most appropriate target population, and time post-stroke, in
accordance with the second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation
Roundtable recommendations. The authors declare that the research was
conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships
that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Neurological
principles and rehabilitation of action disorders are crucial in the
rehabilitation of stroke patients. Research has shown that mobilization
and tactile stimulation can improve the recovery of the hemiplegic upper
limb, chronic upper-limb sensorimotor dysfunction after stroke, and
support perceptual-motor functions. Textured materials can also play a
role in supporting perceptual-motor functions. The Bobath concept,
which involves the use of textured surfaces to improve standing balance,
has been shown to be effective in rehabilitating somatic sensation and
motor control deficits in patients with pure sensory stroke. Repetitive task
training has been shown to improve functional ability after stroke, and a
systematic review of repetitive functional task practice with modeling of
resource use, costs, and effectiveness has been conducted. This summary
discusses various studies on dynamic standing balance tests for stroke
patients, physiotherapy treatment, and somatosensory stimulation for
lower-limb recovery. The studies provide valuable insights into the
reliability, validity, and comparison of these tests with healthy elderly
individuals. They also highlight the importance of standardized
measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials and the use of
thematic analysis in psychology. The authors also discuss the
development of a stroke recovery trial development framework, the
optimization of semmes-weinstein monofilaments for establishing point
tactile thresholds, and the use of footscan pressure insoles for measuring
force and pressure in running. The summary concludes by highlighting
the importance of these studies in improving health and healthcare
outcomes for stroke patients. This summary discusses various studies on
the use of qualitative data analysis in healthcare research. The studies
include systematic debriefing after qualitative encounters, a 'traffic light'
test for early diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, a randomized
controlled trial of functional strength training for upper limb recovery, a
randomized controlled trial of an ankle-foot cast on walking recovery,
and a simulation study on sample size requirements to estimate key
design parameters from external pilot randomized controlled trials. The
authors also discuss the importance of patient and public involvement in
health research and the potential of investigator triangulation in mixed
methods research. The summary concludes by emphasizing the need for
careful consideration of precision and efficiency in pilot studies and the
importance of patient and public involvement in health research.
 CHAPTER - 3

METHODOLOGY

Sensory stimulation refers to the activation and stimulation of the various

sensory systems in the body, including touch, vision, hearing, smell, and taste.
This stimulation plays a crucial role in our perception and experience of the

world around us, as well as in various cognitive and physiological processes.

Types of Sensory Stimulation

Tactile Stimulation:

Involves stimulating the sense of touch through various textures, temperatures,

and pressure.

Examples: massage, textured surfaces, vibration devices, temperature

variations.

Visual Stimulation:

Stimulates the visual system through light, colors, patterns, and movement.

Examples: colored lighting, nature videos, visual illusions, and artwork.

Auditory Stimulation:

Involves stimulating the sense of hearing through sounds, music, and rhythms.

Examples: music therapy, nature sounds, rhythmic patterns, and audio books.

Olfactory Stimulation:
Stimulates the sense of smell through various aromas and fragrances.

Examples: essential oils, scented candles, and aromatherapy.

Gustatory Stimulation:

Stimulates the sense of taste through different flavors and textures.

Examples: flavor-enhanced foods and beverages, tasting experiences.

Sensory Stimulation in Healthcare and Therapy

Sensory stimulation techniques have been widely used in various healthcare and

therapeutic settings for their potential benefits, including:

1. Cognitive and Sensory Stimulation:

Sensory stimulation can help activate and stimulate specific sensory pathways

in the brain, potentially enhancing cognitive function, memory, and sensory

perception.

It is often used in dementia care, stroke rehabilitation, and sensory integration

therapy.
2. Pain Management:

Certain sensory stimulation techniques, such as massage, temperature

modalities, and relaxing music or aromas, can help reduce pain perception and

promote relaxation.

3. Stress and Anxiety Reduction:

Exposure to calming sensory stimuli, like soothing sounds, pleasant scents, or

gentle tactile stimulation, can help reduce stress, anxiety, and promote a sense

of well-being.

4. Behavioral and Emotional Regulation:

Sensory stimulation can be used as a therapeutic tool to help individuals

regulate their behavior, emotions, and sensory processing abilities, particularly

in conditions like autism spectrum disorder and sensory processing disorders.

5. Sensory Integration:

Sensory stimulation techniques are often used in sensory integration therapy to

help individuals better process and integrate sensory information from different
modalities, improving their ability to function and interact with their

environment.

Sensory Stimulation in Rehabilitation and Neuroplasticity

Sensory stimulation has also been explored as a potential approach to promote

neuroplasticity and facilitate recovery in various neurological conditions, such

as:

1. Stroke Rehabilitation:

Sensory stimulation techniques, like constraint-induced movement therapy and

virtual reality, can help stimulate neural pathways and promote functional

recovery after stroke.

2. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation:

Sensory stimulation, combined with physical therapy and assistive technologies,

can help promote neural reorganization and improve sensory and motor function

in individuals with spinal cord injuries.

3. Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation:

Sensory stimulation approaches may help activate and stimulate specific brain

regions, potentially enhancing cognitive and functional recovery after traumatic

brain injuries.

4. Neurodegenerative Disorders:

Sensory stimulation techniques, such as music therapy and multisensory

stimulation, have been explored as potential interventions to improve cognitive

function, behavior, and quality of life in individuals with conditions like

Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

Sensory stimulation techniques are versatile and can be tailored to meet the

specific needs and goals of individuals in various healthcare and therapeutic

settings. However, it is important to note that the effectiveness and appropriate

application of sensory stimulation approaches may vary depending on the

individual's condition, preferences, and therapeutic goals.

ADVANTAGES :

1. Improved tactile perception and discrimination:

Tactile stimulation can help enhance an individual's ability to perceive and

differentiate various textures, shapes, and tactile stimuli. This improved tactile

perception can facilitate activities of daily living, object manipulation, and

overall sensory awareness.

2. Facilitation of neural plasticity:

Tactile stimulation has been shown to promote neural plasticity, which refers to

the brain's ability to reorganize and adapt its neural connections in response to

new experiences or changes in the environment. By activating and stimulating

the tactile pathways, tactile stimulation may contribute to the formation of new

neural connections and the reorganization of existing ones.

3. Improved proprioception and motor function:

Tactile stimulation can enhance proprioception, which is the awareness of one's

body position and movement in space. This improved proprioception can lead to

better coordination, balance, and motor control, benefiting individuals with

conditions such as stroke, spinal cord injuries, or neurodegenerative disorders.

4. Pain management:
Certain forms of tactile stimulation, such as massage therapy or the application

of pressure or vibration, can help modulate pain perception by activating

specific neural pathways and releasing natural analgesics like endorphins and

enkephalins.

5. Stress and anxiety reduction:

Gentle tactile stimulation, like stroking or touch therapy, can have a calming

effect on the body and mind, reducing stress and anxiety levels by activating the

parasympathetic nervous system and promoting relaxation.

6. Sensory integration and regulation:

Tactile stimulation is a key component of sensory integration therapy, which

aims to improve an individual's ability to process and integrate sensory

information from various modalities. This can help individuals with sensory

processing disorders or autism spectrum disorders to better regulate their

sensory experiences and improve their overall functioning.

7. Cognitive and emotional development:

Tactile stimulation, particularly in early childhood, has been associated with

positive impacts on cognitive and emotional development. Appropriate tactile

experiences can contribute to the development of attachment, self-regulation,

and overall brain maturation.

8. Enhanced social interaction and bonding:

Touch and tactile stimulation play a crucial role in social interactions and

emotional bonding. Appropriate tactile stimulation can promote positive social

experiences, communication, and emotional connections, benefiting individuals

with social or communication difficulties

 CHAPTER - 4

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
Sensory deficiency, encompassing impairments in tactile perception

and proprioception, presents significant challenges in rehabilitation

settings, particularly during weight-bearing activities. Individuals

with sensory deficits often struggle to maintain balance, coordinate

movements, and perform functional tasks essential for daily living.

Traditional therapeutic approaches may fall short in effectively

addressing these deficits, necessitating the development of innovative

interventions to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.

The concept of tactile stimulation as a therapeutic modality has gained

traction in rehabilitation science due to its potential to enhance

sensory perception and motor control. Tactile stimulation involves the

application of various tactile inputs, such as textures, vibrations, and

pressure, to stimulate tactile receptors throughout the body. By

targeting sensory pathways and promoting sensory-motor integration,

tactile stimulation can improve proprioceptive awareness, spatial

orientation, and movement coordination.

The application of tactile stimulation in weight-bearing positions

presents unique challenges, as it requires stability, support, and

precise control over sensory input. Existing tactile stimulation

equipment may not adequately address these requirements, prompting

the need for the development of specialized equipment tailored to the

needs of sensory deficient patients engaged in weight-bearing

activities.
 CHAPTER - 5

OBJECTIVES OF THE INVENTION

The primary objectives of the invention are as follows:

1. Enhancing Sensory-Motor Integration: The invention aims to

facilitate the integration of sensory information with motor

responses during weight-bearing activities. By providing

targeted tactile stimulation in strategic body regions, the

invention seeks to improve proprioceptive feedback and

enhance movement coordination.

2. Improving Functional Performance: The invention aims to

enhance the functional performance of individuals with sensory

deficits by promoting better balance, stability, and mobility.

Through repeated exposure to tactile stimulation in weight-

bearing positions, users can develop adaptive strategies for

performing activities of daily living more effectively.

3. Customization and Adaptability: The invention seeks to offer

customizable and adaptable features to accommodate diverse

patient needs and therapeutic goals. By allowing therapists to

adjust the intensity, frequency, and location of tactile

 stimulation, the invention can be tailored to address specific

sensory-motor impairments and rehabilitation objectives.

4. Facilitating Rehabilitation Progression: The invention aims to

support the progression of rehabilitation programs by providing

a safe and controlled environment for sensory-motor training.

By gradually increasing the complexity and challenge of tactile

stimulation exercises, users can advance their sensory-motor

skills and achieve functional milestones more efficiently.

5. Promoting Patient Engagement and Compliance: The

invention endeavors to enhance patient engagement and

compliance with therapeutic interventions by making tactile

stimulation exercises engaging, interactive, and enjoyable.

Through the integration of feedback mechanisms and interactive

features, the invention seeks to motivate users to participate

actively in their rehabilitation process.

CHAPTER - 6

SUMMRY
The development of innovative interventions for individuals with

sensory deficits, particularly in weight-bearing activities, is

imperative for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes. Sensory

deficiency, encompassing impairments in tactile perception and

proprioception, significantly impacts an individual's ability to perform

essential tasks for mobility and functional independence.

Conventional therapeutic approaches may not effectively address

these deficits, necessitating the exploration of novel modalities.

Tactile stimulation has emerged as a promising avenue in

rehabilitation science, offering the potential to enhance sensory

perception and motor control. By targeting tactile receptors

throughout the body, tactile stimulation can improve proprioceptive

awareness and facilitate the integration of sensory information for

motor planning and execution. However, applying tactile stimulation

in weight-bearing positions presents unique challenges, requiring

stability and support. This paper introduces an innovative equipment

designed specifically for providing tactile stimulation to sensory

deficient patients in weight-bearing positions. The equipment

integrates principles of sensory integration and proprioceptive

feedback to optimize therapeutic outcomes in rehabilitation settings.

The tactile stimulation equipment is characterized by its sturdy

platform with adjustable height and inclination settings,

accommodating varying patient needs and therapeutic goals.

Strategically placed tactile stimulators, including textured surfaces,

vibration modules, and pressure sensors, deliver sensory input to

specific body regions during weight-bearing activities. The modular

design allows therapists to customize the configuration of tactile

stimulators based on individual patient requirements, while safety

features such as handrails and harness systems ensure patient stability

and prevent falls. A central control unit enables therapists to adjust

the intensity, frequency, and duration of tactile stimulation, while also

facilitating real-time monitoring of patient response.

The equipment demonstrates remarkable versatility across various

rehabilitation domains, catering to the diverse needs of sensory

deficient patients. In orthopedic rehabilitation, it addresses

proprioceptive deficits following musculoskeletal injuries or

surgeries, facilitating sensory-motor integration and proprioceptive

feedback. For pediatric patients with developmental delays or sensory

processing disorders, it promotes sensory-motor development and

functional skills through tactile exploration and guided therapeutic

interventions. In neurological rehabilitation, the equipment

complements traditional approaches by targeting sensory-motor

pathways and promoting neuroplasticity in individuals with

conditions such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, or cerebral

palsy. Additionally, in sports rehabilitation, it aids athletes in

optimizing proprioception, balance, and movement efficiency,

facilitating safe and effective return to sport following injuries.

The objectives of the invention encompass enhancing sensory-motor

integration, improving functional performance, providing

customization and adaptability, facilitating rehabilitation progression,

and promoting patient engagement and compliance. By addressing

these objectives, the equipment aims to provide a comprehensive and

effective solution for tactile sensory deficient patients, ultimately

improving their functional outcomes, independence, and overall

quality of life.
The development of specialized tactile stimulation equipment for

sensory deficient patients in weight-bearing positions represents a

significant advancement in rehabilitation technology. By integrating

principles of sensory integration and proprioceptive feedback, the

equipment offers tailored interventions to address sensory-motor

challenges and promote holistic development in individuals with

diverse needs. Continued research and clinical application are

essential to further elucidate its efficacy and optimize outcomes for

patients undergoing rehabilitation.

 CHAPTER 7
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Our invention introduces a revolutionary approach to tactile sensory stimulation

with a multitextured tactile sensory trail designed specifically for individuals

with sensory deficits. The trail comprises multiple sections, each featuring a

unique combination of textured materials aimed at providing diverse tactile

experiences.

Rubber anti-slip material offers stability and safety, while ropes made from

coconut fibers provide a rough, stimulating texture. Soft faux fur surfaces offer

a calming sensation, while bamboo sticks provide a natural and eco-friendly

tactile experience.

Incorporating rubber bubble materials adds a fun popping sensation, and

sandpaper surfaces offer a gritty, abrasive texture. Pebble-shaped rubber and

PVC materials mimic the feel of natural pebbles, promoting sensory integration

and proprioceptive input.

Additionally, PVC spike materials offer intense tactile stimulation, and artificial

grass provides a unique sensation for weight-bearing activities. Hexagonal

pattern surfaces made of rubber and PVC offer a cushioned yet stimulating

experience, while ridge scraper rubber mats provide distinct ridged textures.
The trail is constructed on a base of yoga mats, with each compartment

containing whistle toys for auditory feedback. This setup allows individuals to

engage in weight-bearing activities while experiencing a rich variety of tactile

sensations, promoting sensory integration and stimulation.

The invention is a multitextured tactile sensory trail designed to provide diverse

tactile experiences through an arrangement of varied textures on the upper

surfaces (fig.1.1). The path / trail also comprises of base ( fig 1.2) that had

whistle on it . The trail comprises multiple sections or stations, each featuring a

distinct textured base surface to walk on and a correspondingly textured upper

surface overhead.
Figure 1.1 – Upper surface of the invention

Figure 1.2 – Base of the invention

 CHAPTER 8

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Upper surface of the trail / path

Rubber anti slip material is used

Rubber materials with anti-slip properties are commonly used in tactile sensory

stimulation products and activities. These materials are designed to provide a

unique texture which can be beneficial for individuals with sensory processing

disorders, autism, or other special needs or sensory deficit.

These rubber materials are appreciated for their durability, resistance to

moisture, and ease of cleaning, making them suitable for use in various tactile

sensory activities and environments. Additionally, their anti-slip properties help

ensure safety and stability during sensory exploration and play.

Fig. 1.1 (a )

Rope of coconut fibers material

Ropes made from coconut fibers (also known as coir fibers) are commonly used

in tactile sensory stimulation trails and environments. These ropes offer a

unique tactile experience due to their natural, textured surface and distinct feel.

The characteristics of coconut fiber ropes that make them suitable for tactile

sensory stimulation include:

Coarse texture: Coconut fibers have a rough, coarse texture that provides a

distinct tactile sensation when touched or manipulated. This texture can be

stimulating for individuals seeking sensory input or those working on

developing their tactile awareness.

Natural material: Being derived from coconut husks, coconut fiber ropes are

made from a natural, plant-based material. This can be appealing for individuals

who prefer natural, eco-friendly materials or those who have sensitivities to

synthetic materials.

Durability: Coconut fiber ropes are known for their strength and durability,

making them suitable for use in sensory trails and environments where they may

be subjected to repeated handling and manipulation.

Versatility: Coconut fiber ropes can be incorporated into various sensory trail

elements, such as woven into sensory mats or surfaces.

In tactile sensory stimulation trails, coconut fiber ropes can be used in

combination with other tactile elements, such as different textures (smooth,

rough, soft)

Fig 1.1 ( b )
Faux fur material is used

Faux fur (artificial fur) is commonly used in tactile sensory stimulation trails

and environments. The soft, plush texture of faux fur provides a distinct tactile

experience that can be beneficial for individual.

Sensory mats or surfaces: Faux fur is used to cover portions of the sensory trail

or create dedicated sensory mats or surfaces. Walking or crawling on these soft,

furry surfaces can provide a calming and soothing experience for individuals

who seek deep pressure input or enjoy the sensation of soft textures.

Faux fur is preferred over real fur in sensory environments due to its

hypoallergenic properties and ease of maintenance. It can be cleaned and

sanitized more easily, making it suitable for use in educational or therapeutic

settings.
Fig. 1.1 ( c )

Bamboo sticks material is used

Bamboo sticks are used in tactile sensory stimulation trails . The unique texture

and natural properties of bamboo make it an excellent material for providing

tactile input and sensory experiences.

Sensory paths: Bamboo sticks are attached to the upper surface , creating a

tactile sensory path for individuals to walk or crawl across, feeling the distinct

texture of the bamboo under their feet.

The natural properties of bamboo, such as its smooth surface, firm texture, and

eco-friendly nature, make it an appealing choice for tactile sensory stimulation.

Additionally, bamboo is durable and can withstand frequent handling and

manipulation.
Fig . 1.1 ( d )

Rubber bubble material is used

Rubber bubble materials, also known as bubble wrap or anti-fatigue mats, are

often used in tactile sensory stimulation trails . These materials provide a unique

tactile experience with their distinctive bubble texture and the satisfying

popping sensation when pressed.

Sensory pathways: Rubber bubble mats or sheets are laid out on the upper

surface of the trail , creating a sensory pathway for individuals to walk or crawl

over. This allows them to experience the tactile sensation of the bubbles under

their feet, promoting sensory integration and body awareness.

The popping sensation and the unique texture of rubber bubble materials can

provide a calming or stimulating effect, depending on the individual's sensory

needs. Additionally, the visual appeal of the bubble patterns can add an

engaging visual component to the sensory experience.

Fig. 1.1 ( g )

Sand paper material is used

Sandpaper is an excellent material to use in tactile sensory stimulation trails due

to its distinct properties and the unique sensory experience it provides. Here are

some key properties of sandpaper that make it an effective choice for sensory

stimulation trails:

1. Texture:

Sandpaper is known for its rough, gritty texture, which provides a significant

tactile experience.
The texture can range from slightly rough to coarse, depending on the grit level

of the sandpaper.

This texture can be stimulating for individuals seeking tactile input or those

working on developing their tactile awareness.

Abrasiveness:

Sandpaper is an abrasive material, meaning it has a rough surface that can

gently scratch or scrape other surfaces.

This abrasive property can be used to create interesting textures or patterns on

various surfaces, adding to the sensory experience.

3. Durability:

Sandpaper is a relatively durable material, making it suitable for use in sensory

trails or environments where it may be subjected to repeated handling and

manipulation.

It can withstand wear and tear, ensuring longevity in the sensory trail.

4. Variety:

Sandpaper is available in various grit levels, ranging from very fine to

extremely coarse.

This variety allows for the incorporation of different textures into the sensory

trail, catering to different sensory needs or preferences.

5. Safety:

While sandpaper is a rough material, it is generally considered safe for use in

sensory trails when properly secured and supervised.

Fig. 1.1 ( f )

Rubber polyvinyl pebble material is used

Pebble material are used in tactile sensory stimulation trails and environments

due to their unique properties and the diverse sensory experiences they offer

1. Texture:

Pebble material are characterized by a textured surface composed of small,

smooth pebbles or pebble-like elements.

The varying sizes, shapes, and textures of the pebbles create an irregular and

stimulating tactile experience.

This texture can promote tactile awareness, sensory integration, and

proprioceptive input (awareness of body position and movement).

2. Natural appearance:

Pebble material mats often mimic the appearance of natural pebbles or river

rocks, which can create a calming and grounding sensory experience.

The natural look and feel of the pebbles can provide a connection to nature and

promote relaxation.

3. Durability:

Pebble material mats are typically made of durable materials, ensuring

longevity and resistance to wear and tear.

This durability makes them suitable for use in sensory trails or environments

where they may be subjected to repeated use and foot traffic.

4. Non-slip surface:
pebble material mats are designed with a non-slip surface or backing, providing

traction and stability for individuals walking or crawling on the mat.

This safety feature is particularly important in sensory trails or environments

where mobility and balance activities may be involved.

5. Sensory integration:

Pebble material mats can provide a multisensory experience by combining

tactile input with visual and proprioceptive stimulation.

The irregular texture and varying pebble sizes can challenge balance and

coordination, promoting sensory integration and body awareness.

Fig. 1.1 ( g )
Polyvinyl chloride ( PVC ) spike material is used

PVC spike material can be an effective material for incorporating tactile sensory

stimulation into sensory paths or trails. These material feature a surface covered

with small, rigid spikes made of PVC (polyvinyl chloride) plastic. Here are

some properties and considerations for using PVC spike material in tactile

sensory stimulation:

1. Texture:

The spiky surface of these mats provides a unique and intense tactile

experience.

The rigid spikes create a prickly, stimulating sensation when walked or crawled

upon, promoting tactile awareness and sensory integration.

2. Durability:

PVC is a durable and long-lasting material, making these mats suitable for

heavy use in sensory trails or environments.

The spikes are designed to withstand repeated pressure and wear without easily

breaking or becoming dislodged.

3. Non-slip surface:

Many PVC spike door mats have a textured or grooved underside, providing

traction and preventing slipping on various surfaces.

This non-slip feature is essential for ensuring safety when used in sensory paths

or trails.

4. Easy maintenance:

PVC spike mats are generally easy to clean and maintain, as they can be wiped

down or hosed off to remove dirt or debris.

This makes them suitable for use in both indoor and outdoor sensory

environments.

5. Sensory integration:

In addition to tactile stimulation, PVC spike mats can provide proprioceptive

input (awareness of body position and movement) as individuals navigate the

spiky surface.

This combination of sensory inputs can promote sensory integration and body

awareness.

6. Safety considerations:

While the spikes are designed to be safe for bare skin, it's important to supervise

individuals, especially those with sensory processing disorders or

developmental disabilities, to ensure appropriate use and prevent any potential

injuries.

Proper footwear or protective gear may be necessary for some individuals,

depending on their sensory needs and preferences.

Fig .1.1 ( h )

Artificial grass is used

Artificial grass can be an effective material for tactile sensory stimulation,

particularly when used in a weight-bearing position. Here are some key points

about using artificial grass for this purpose:

1. Texture and sensation: Artificial grass provides a unique texture and

sensation that can be stimulating for the feet when weight is applied.

2. Proprioceptive input: When standing, sitting, or applying pressure on the

artificial grass surface, the body receives proprioceptive input from the feet,

joints, and muscles. This can help improve body awareness, balance, and

sensory integration.

3. Calming or alerting effect: Depending on the individual's sensory needs, the

artificial grass surface can have either a calming or an alerting effect. The

texture and resistance provided by the surface can help modulate sensory input

for those who are under- or over-responsive to sensory stimuli.

4. Maintenance: Artificial grass is generally low-maintenance and easy to clean,

making it a practical choice for sensory stimulation activities. It can be

disinfected and does not require watering or mowing like natural grass.
Fig. 1.1 (I )

Hexagonal pattern surface of rubber , Pvc is used

Hexagonal pattern mats made of rubber and PVC (polyvinyl chloride) can be

effectively used for tactile stimulation in weight-bearing positions. These types

of mats offer several benefits for sensory integration and proprioceptive input:

1. Cushioned material: The rubber and PVC combination often used provides a

slightly cushioned surface that can be comfortable for weight-bearing activities.

The cushioning also allows for some give and resistance, which can further

enhance proprioceptive input.

2. Durable and slip-resistant: Rubber and PVC are durable materials that can

withstand heavy use and weight-bearing activities. The textured surface also

provides good traction and slip resistance, making it safer for activities that

involve movement or shifting weight.

3. Easy to clean and maintain: Rubber and PVC mats are typically easy to clean

and maintain, ensuring a hygienic environment for sensory activities.

 Fig.1.1 (j )

Ridge scarper rubber material is used

Ridge scraper mats can be an excellent choice for tactile sensory stimulation

due to their unique texture and properties. Here are key properties of ridge

scraper mats that make them suitable for this purpose:

1. Distinct ridged texture: These mats feature a series of parallel ridges or

raised lines, providing a distinctive tactile sensation when walked upon.

2. Durable construction: Ridge scraper mats are typically made of durable

materials like rubber or PVC, ensuring long-lasting use in sensory

environments.
3. Non-slip surface: The textured ridges and durable material provide a non-slip

surface, enhancing safety during sensory activities involving movement.

4. Cushioned base: Many ridge scraper mats have a cushioned base, offering

comfort during weight-bearing activities while still providing tactile input.

5. Portability: Ridge scraper mats are often available in modular or roll-up

designs, making them easy to transport and set up in different environments.

6. Easy to clean: The durable materials and raised texture allow for easy

cleaning and maintenance, ensuring a hygienic sensory environment.

7. Temperature insulation: Some ridge scraper mats offer insulation properties,

making them suitable for use in different temperature environments.

8.Eco-friendly options: Certain manufacturers offer ridge scraper mats made

from recycled or sustainable materials, providing an environmentally friendly

choice.
 Fig.1.1 ( k )

Proper supervision and safety measures should be implemented, especially

during weight-bearing activities or those involving movement.

BASE OF THE INVENTION

The tactile sensory stimulation trail made with yoga mats as the base for

weight-bearing positions:

1. Number of compartments: 11

2. Measurements of each compartment:

- Length: 24 inches / 0.61 meters

 - Breadth: 20 inches / 0.50 meters

- Area of each compartment: 0.30 square meters (sq m)

3. Whistle toys (squeakers) used:

- 4 whistle toys in each compartment

- Total number of whistle toys used: 44 (4 whistles x 11 compartments)

4. Base material: Yoga mats

The tactile sensory stimulation trail consists of 11 compartments, each

measuring 24 inches (0.61 meters) in length and 20 inches (0.50 meters) in

breadth, with an area of 0.30 square meters. Each compartment contains 4

whistle toys or squeakers, totaling 44 whistle toys across the entire trail.

This setup allows individuals to engage in weight-bearing activities by walking,

crawling, or applying pressure on the yoga mat base. The auditory feedback

from the whistles, combined with the tactile input from the upper surface, can

provide a multi-sensory experience for sensory integration and stimulation.

COMBINING UPPER SURFACE ON THE BASE :-

Each box represents one yoga mat compartment measuring 24 inches (0.61

meters) in length and 20 inches (0.50 meters) in breadth, with an area of 0.30

square meters.

The materials used for each mat compartment can be as follows:

1. Mat 1: Circular rubber shaped

2. Mat 2: Coir fibre

3. Mat 3: Faux fur

4. Mat 4: Bamboo sticks

5. Mat 5: Rubber with bubble shapes

6. Mat 6: Sand paper

7. Mat 7: Pvc pebble shaped

8. Mat 8: Rubber spikes

9. Mat 9: Artificial grass

10. Mat 10: Rubber of hexagonal pattern

11. Mat 11: Rubber ridge scarper

In this model, the textured materials are arranged with 4 on each side vertically

(mats a-d on the left side and mats h-k on the right side) and 3 between them

horizontally (mats e-g).

This arrangement allows individuals to experience a variety of tactile sensations

by walking, crawling, or applying pressure on the trail. They can move

horizontally or vertically, encountering different textures and materials along

the way, promoting sensory integration and stimulation.

The model meets the sensory needs of the individuals, and the desired level of

tactile stimulation. Additionally, safety precautions should be taken, such as

ensuring that the materials are securely attached and free from potential hazards.

This tactile sensory stimulation trail allows for weight-bearing activities while

providing a diverse range of tactile experiences through different textures,

materials, and surfaces, promoting sensory integration and stimulation.

CHAPTER - 9

CLAIM
Our multitextured tactile sensory trail represents a groundbreaking innovation in

the field of sensory stimulation for individuals with sensory deficits. By

incorporating a diverse range of textured materials such as rubber anti-slip,

coconut fiber ropes, faux fur, bamboo sticks, rubber bubbles, sandpaper, pebble-

shaped rubber and PVC, PVC spikes, artificial grass, hexagonal pattern

surfaces, and ridge scraper rubber mats, our invention offers a comprehensive

solution for addressing various sensory needs.

The unique combination of materials and textures provides individuals with a

rich sensory experience, promoting sensory integration, proprioceptive input,

and tactile awareness. Moreover, the incorporation of whistle toys in each

compartment of the trail enhances auditory feedback, further enriching the

sensory experience.

Through this innovative design, our tactile sensory trail facilitates weight-

bearing activities while offering a safe, engaging, and stimulating environment

for individuals with sensory deficits. This trail has the potential to revolutionize

sensory therapy and contribute significantly to the well-being and development

of individuals with sensory processing disorders, autism, or other sensory

deficits.

CHAPTER – 10

REFERENCES
1. Shull, P. B., & Damian, D. D. (2015). Haptic wearables as

sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer–a

review. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 12, 1-13.

2. Carey, L. M., Matyas, T. A., & Oke, L. E. (1993). Sensory loss

in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive

discrimination. Archives of physical medicine and

rehabilitation, 74(6), 602-611.

3. Vuillerme, N., Pinsault, N., Fleury, A., Chenu, O., Demongeot,

J., Payan, Y., & Pavan, P. (2008). Effectiveness of an electro-

tactile vestibular substitution system in improving upright

postural control in unilateral vestibular-defective patients. Gait

& posture, 28(4), 711-715.

4. Donati, A. R., Shokur, S., Morya, E., Campos, D. S., Moioli, R.

C., Gitti, C. M., ... & Nicolelis, M. A. (2016). Long-term

training with a brain-machine interface-based gait protocol

induces partial neurological recovery in paraplegic

patients. Scientific reports, 6(1), 30383.

5. Robbins, S., Waked, E., & McClaran, J. (1995). Proprioception

and stability: foot position awareness as a function of age and

footware. Age and Ageing, 24(1), 67-72.

6. Robbins, S., Waked, E., & McClaran, J. (1995). Proprioception

and stability: foot position awareness as a function of age and

footware. Age and Ageing, 24(1), 67-72.

7. Page, P. (2006). Sensorimotor training: A “global” approach for

balance training. Journal of bodywork and movement

therapies, 10(1), 77-84.

8. Shokur, S., Donati, A. R., Campos, D. S., Gitti, C., Bao, G.,

Fischer, D., ... & Nicolelis, M. A. (2018). Training with brain-

machine interfaces, visuo-tactile feedback and assisted

locomotion improves sensorimotor, visceral, and psychological

 signs in chronic paraplegic patients. PloS one, 13(11),

e0206464.

9. Gaudio, S., Brooks, S. J., & Riva, G. (2014). Nonvisual

multisensory impairment of body perception in anorexia

nervosa: a systematic review of neuropsychological

studies. PloS one, 9(10), e110087.

10. Gaudio, S., Brooks, S. J., & Riva, G. (2014). Nonvisual

multisensory impairment of body perception in anorexia

nervosa: a systematic review of neuropsychological studies.

PloS one, 9(10), e110087.

11. Bolognini, N., Russo, C., & Edwards, D. J. (2016). The

sensory side of post-stroke motor rehabilitation. Restorative

neurology and neuroscience, 34(4), 571-586.

12. Schabrun, S. M., & Hillier, S. (2009). Evidence for the

retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review. Clinical

rehabilitation, 23(1), 27-39.

13. Auld, M. L., Russo, R., Moseley, G. L., & Johnston, L. M.

(2014). Determination of interventions for upper extremity

tactile impairment in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic

 review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 56(9),

815-832.

14. Auld, M. L., Russo, R., Moseley, G. L., & Johnston, L. M.

(2014). Determination of interventions for upper extremity

tactile impairment in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic

review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 56(9),

815-832.

15. Kranowitz, C. S. (2006). The out-of-sync child:

Recognizing and coping with sensory processing disorder.

Penguin.

16. Reider, B., Arcand, M. A., Diehl, L. H., Mroczek, K.,

Abulencia, A., Stroud, C. C., ... & Staszak, P. (2003).

Proprioception of the knee before and after anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of

Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 19(1), 2-12.

17. Reider, B., Arcand, M. A., Diehl, L. H., Mroczek, K.,

Abulencia, A., Stroud, C. C., ... & Staszak, P. (2003).

Proprioception of the knee before and after anterior cruciate

 ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of

Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 19(1), 2-12.

18. Reider, B., Arcand, M. A., Diehl, L. H., Mroczek, K.,

Abulencia, A., Stroud, C. C., ... & Staszak, P. (2003).

Proprioception of the knee before and after anterior cruciate

ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy: The Journal of

Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 19(1), 2-12.

19. Karagiannopoulos, C., & Michlovitz, S. (2016).

Rehabilitation strategies for wrist sensorimotor control

impairment: from theory to practice. Journal of Hand Therapy,

29(2), 154-165.

20. Chia, F. S., Kuys, S., & Low Choy, N. (2019). Sensory

retraining of the leg after stroke: systematic review and meta-

analysis. Clinical rehabilitation, 33(6), 964-979.

21. Beard, D. J., Kyberd, P. J., O'Connor, J. J., Fergusson, C.

M., & Dodd, C. A. (1994). Reflex hamstring contraction latency

in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Journal of Orthopaedic

Research, 12(2), 219-228.

22. Mao, Y., Chen, P., Li, L., & Huang, D. (2014). Virtual

reality training improves balance function. Neural regeneration

research, 9(17), 1628-1634.

23. Khullar, S. M., Emami, B., Westermark, A., & Haan, H. R.

(1996). Effect of low-level laser treatment on neurosensory

deficits subsequent to saggittal split ramus osteotomy. Oral

Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and

Endodontology, 82(2), 132-138.

24. Jensen, R., Hystad, T., Kvale, A., & Baerheim, A. (2007).

Quantitative sensory testing of patients with long lasting

patellofemoral pain syndrome. European Journal of Pain, 11(6),

665-676.

25. Stephens-Fripp, B., Alici, G., & Mutlu, R. (2018). A

review of non-invasive sensory feedback methods for transradial

prosthetic hands. IEEE Access, 6, 6878-6899.