Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Asm2 SG09 DI
Asm2 SG09 DI
Asm2 SG09 DI
com…
Introduction to Management
BUSM4185B Case study analysis
Happy Coffee
1. Case analysis
Ineffective human resource planning and poor selection decisions are 2 main factors
causing this consequence. Firstly, HRP is defined as the process of future-oriented,
which means personnel managers are responsible for determining the precise
quantity and kinds of people that will be needed to achieve organizational objectives
as well as matching the individuals with their right capabilities at the proper time
(Nkomo 1987). HRP process requires an assessment the availability of the workforce
with their requisite abilities, skills and qualifications to perform their tasks
effectively, scrutiny of vacancies to avoid being understaffed or overstaffed and
anticipation of human resource (HR) issues to meet future organizational objectives
effectively (Chakraborty & Biswas 2019). Hence, an effective HRP could contribute
to reinforcing organizational performance and is a solid foundation for other HR
strategies such as recruitment, selection and training in supporting to limit the
following problems (Al-Qudah et al. 2020). Nevertheless, the HR department from
Happy Coffee has not carried these theories into its HRP which results in manpower-
related problems. In detail, as Mr. Tran, who is the manager of the closed branch,
said that he frequently fell into a shortage of personnel and got stuck with very
inexperienced employees. The reason is that the HR department did not implement
the HRP process carefully in assessing current capabilities to meet future needs.
Secondly, problems about workers such as being late for work, having a negative
attitude on the job, overusing sick leaves and only staying for a few weeks before
quitting because of Happy Coffee's poor selection decisions. Sahoo, Das and
Sundaray (2011) confirmed that poor selection decisions lead to spending more time
1
in training, workforce turnover, absenteeism, industrial unrest, employees’
satisfaction with their jobs and underperformance. Therefore, the HR department
needs to pay more attention to HRP and selection decisions so that they can have
quality human resources.
2. Solutions
Enhancing the HRM system is a vital element for the existence of Happy Coffee.
O’Donovan (2019) confirmed that a proper adoption of HRM contributes to the
development of the organization and making sustainable competitive advantages.
2
• Applying quantitative approach and selection tools
The first solution to have quality human capital is to apply a quantitative approach
into HRP. This approach uses quantitative techniques such as data collection
(mathematical and statistical information) and mathematical manipulation of that
data to help decision makers enhance quality decisions (Truong 2021a). Purwadi
(1996) proved that a quantitative approach can help the organization get the
applicable decisions about the right number of new workers which place them
consistent with their competence at the right time and can get standard qualifications
of workers. Therefore, Happy Coffee should apply quantitative techniques because
it not only assists to avoid staff shortages or redundancies but also improves
organizational productivity. Using selection tools is the second method to have a
fruitful workforce for this coffee shop. There are a variety of methods through which
personnel selection can be carried out such as application forms, written tests,
interviews, performance-simulation tests, etc. (Truong 2021c). They can support the
HR manager in picking apposite candidates to be hired. Opayemi and Oyesola
(2013) have emphasized that the behaviours of employees plays a crucial role in
achieving an organizational goal. Hence, the manager must be deeply understanding
of whether employee characteristics are associated with such job performance.
3. Recommendations
3
• Using various quantitative approach and selection tools to be more
effective
The combination of a clear compensation system and some strict contract terms will
ensure employee commitment to the company at the beginning. Happy Coffee
should consider whether salary decisions are appropriate based on employee
productivity and hours worked. They are highly recommended to use monitoring
tools to control and assess their employees more effectively and precisely. The
manager should care more about the quality of employees’ work for the organization
and overtime payment terms as well. Also, Mr. Tran should provide some bonuses
such as special gifts or tip money which will boost employee motivation to work
more efficiently. A perfect compensation package will energise internal races and
generate more profits. Finally, the expected outcome is an increase in job
satisfaction. As Happy Coffee meets workers’ needs and gives them a much greater
piece of mind financially, the workers' hostility will diminish considerably.
1. Case analysis
4
• Abuse of power
Employee empowerment is based on the idea that providing them with the resources,
skills, authority and opportunity to perform their work well, as well as holding them
responsible and accountable for their behaviours will make them more satisfied and
more proficient (Truong 2021b). Lashley (1996) claimed that empowering
employees will enable them to accomplish their tasks well, take responsibility for
their own actions and performance in the working process so that they can produce
more customers’ satisfaction and gain greater profits for the organization. Yet,
employees of Happy Coffee were not empowered to perform. Specifically, a
customer complained to an employee in the service team about the wrong drink
given but nothing happened to correct that problem about 20 minutes later. The
reason is that this employee was not allowed to compensate the customer if Mr. Tran
did not agree. This led to customer dissatisfaction and made a bad reputation for the
organization “Avoid this coffee shop at all costs!”.
2. Solutions
As mentioned above, a good leader has to know what needs to improve and put the
power appropriately. Therefore, Mr. Tran should consider whether it is right to put
his power to do something. Reducing the use of overpowering and empowering
employees can help Mr. Tran avoid feeling work overload or stressed.
5
• Implementation of empowerment
3. Recommendations
There are a variety of programs that provide training to managers on how to be great
leaders. Program Development was designed to improve leadership skills and it was
provided a framework for program designs which focus on authentic leadership and
increase self-awareness (Hackworth et al. 2018). Mr. Tran should take part in this
program because it facilitates an expansion of the participant’s self-perception about
strengths, limitations and behaviours so that it fosters transformative leadership
skills. By attending the training programs fully, he will acquire the necessary skills
of a leader to be able to run the company smoothly and successfully.
To overcome poor customer experience, Mr. Tran should let his staff participate in
making decisions about simple problems relating to customers’ satisfaction. For
instance, when they get a mistake in an order, they can make a new drink
intermediately to compensate for that consumer. This helps employees have a good
impression of themselves as well as the organization and is a plus point in attracting
customers to use products of Happy Coffee to earn more revenue. As Azoury, Daou
and Sleiaty (2013) claimed, employee empowerment gives them a sense of
6
confidence and respect, develops their acumen to reasonably solve situations and
motivates them to bring more significant achievement and values to the organization.
III. References
Alam, A & Asim, M 2019, ‘Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Turnover
Intention’, International Journal of Human Resource Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, viewed
11 August 2021, <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr-Muhammad-
Asim/publication/332513034_Relationship_Between_Job_Satisfaction_And_Turn
over_Intention/links/5d07c03592851cfcc61ef76c/Relationship-Between-Job-
Satisfaction-And-Turnover-Intention.pdf >.
Azoury, A, Daou, L & Sleiaty, F 2013, ‘Employee engagement in family and non-
family firms’, International Strategic Management Review, vol. 1, no. 1-2, pp. 11–
29.
7
perspective’, Journal of advances in management research, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 659-
682.
8
Lashley, C 1996, ‘Research issues for employee empowerment in hospitality
organisations’, International journal of hospitality management, vol. 15, no. 4, pp.
333–346.
9
Pertiwi, N & Supartha, IWG 2021, ‘The effect of compensation and organizational
commitment on employee satisfaction and retention’, American Journal of
Humanities and Social Sciences Research, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 333-342, viewed 13
August 2021, <https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-
content/uploads/2021/03/ZK2153333342.pdf>.
Purwadi, D 1996, Quantitative Analysis for Human Resource Planning and its
Relationship to Human Resource Information System, Core, UK, viewed 13 August
2021, <https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35262718.pdf>.
Sahoo, CK, Das, S & Sundaray, BK 2011, ‘Strategic human resource management:
Exploring the key drivers’, Employment relations record, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 18–32.
10
Tobing, DSK 2016, ‘THE EFFECT OF COMPENSATION, CAREER
DEVELOPMENT, WORK-FAMILY SUPPORT ON JOB SATISFACTION’,
Polish Journal of Management Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 206-213.
11