Professional Documents
Culture Documents
APPSC - Group-I - Mains-2024 - AG1WMT-3106 - Model Answers: WWW - Civiccentre.in
APPSC - Group-I - Mains-2024 - AG1WMT-3106 - Model Answers: WWW - Civiccentre.in
APPSC - Group-I - Mains-2024 - AG1WMT-3106 - Model Answers: WWW - Civiccentre.in
1(a). Describe the process of acquiring citizenship in India and what are the implications of recent Citizenship
Amendment Act in India?
Syllabus Paper III: Section A: Indian Constitution and its salient features
Deviation of your Answer Demand of the Question
▪ Writing only about Citizenship in India and describing ▪ Describing India's citizenship acquisition process in
only features of recent Citizenship Amendment Act. detail and assessing the recent CAA's implications.
Introduction:
▪ India grants citizenship through various avenues enshrined in Articles 5-11 (Part II) of the Constitution.
Citizenship in India is primarily governed by the Citizenship Act of 1955, which has been amended several times
over the years. The act defines who is considered a citizen of India and under what circumstances citizenship
can be acquired, terminated, or lost. The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) of 2019 expedites citizenship for
persecuted minorities (Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, Christian) from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh,
but excludes Muslims.
Main Dimensions:
The Indian Citizenship Act, 1955 outlines five ways to acquire Indian citizenship:
By Birth:
▪ Pre-1987: Automatic citizenship for anyone born in India before July 1, 1987, irrespective of parent’s nationality
(except for illegal migrants).
▪ 1987-2004: Citizenship granted if at least one parent is an Indian citizen at the time of birth.
▪ Post-2004: Citizenship requires either parents to be Indian citizens or one parent to be a citizen and the other a
legal permanent resident (with some exceptions).
By Descent:
▪ A child born outside India after January 26, 1950 but before December 10, 1992 acquires citizenship if their
father was a citizen at the time of birth.
▪ A person who is born outside India after December 10, 1992, is considered a citizen of India if either his mother
or father holds citizenship at the time of his birth.
By Registration:
▪ Applicable to people of Indian origin who have resided in India for seven years before applying.
▪ Includes people with Indian ancestry residing outside India and spouses of Indian citizens with seven years of
ordinary residency.
▪ Minor children of Indian citizens can also acquire citizenship through registration.
By Naturalization:
▪ This is a discretionary process where the Indian government grants citizenship based on factors like good
character, intention to reside permanently in India, and renunciation of existing citizenship.
By Incorporation of Territory:
▪ When new territory is incorporated into India, residents may become citizens automatically.
The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019:
▪ The CAA, passed in 2019, amends the Citizenship Act by creating a fast track for citizenship for undocumented
immigrants belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, or Christian communities from Afghanistan,
Bangladesh, and Pakistan.
▪ These immigrants are eligible if they entered India on or before December 31, 2014, and have faced religious
persecution in their home countries.
▪ The CAA reduces the residency requirement for citizenship by naturalization from eleven years to five years for
these groups.
Implications of CAA:
▪ Writing about discretionary powers of Governor ▪ Analyze the recent Supreme Court ruling on
without connecting it to recent Supreme Court Governors withholding repassed bills, emphasizing
verdict. their constitutional role in the legislative process.
Introduction:
▪ The recent Supreme Court observations in the Governor vs. State of Tamil Nadu case, 2023 shed light on the
often-murky relationship between Governors and State Legislatures in the legislative process. This analysis
will dissect the Court's stance, highlighting the Governor's constitutional role and the implications for both
executive and legislative powers.
Dimensions:
A Governor's Power: Discretion or Duty?
▪ Article 200 of the Indian Constitution outlines the Governor's role in assenting to bills passed by the State
Legislature, mandates the Governor to give assent "as soon as possible" when a bill is repassed by the
legislature.
▪ The Tamil Nadu case challenged the Governor's extended withholding of bills repassed by the Assembly. The
Supreme Court, questioned the Governor's broad discretion in such situations, emphasized that Article 200
offers limited options – assent, withholding with reasons, or returning for reconsideration. A blanket
withholding, especially after repassage, appears to contradict the spirit of the provision.
Implications for the Governor's Role:
Syllabus Paper III: Section A: Functions and duties of the Indian Union and the State Governments
14(a). Evaluate the implications of utilizing the Money Bill route for contentious legislative changes.
▪ Discussing about Money Bill and its features ▪ Defining Money Bill, evaluation of implications of
utilizing the Money Bill route for contentious
legislative changes, suggestions to address these
implications
Introduction:
▪ Article 110 defines a Money Bill as one dealing with taxes, government borrowing, or expenditure from the
Consolidated Fund of India. Using this route for legislative changes impacts the democratic process and the
balance of power. Significant legislations like the Aadhaar Act, 2016, and the Finance Act, 2017, have been
passed through this route in the past seven years.
Implications:
Undermining Checks and Balances:
▪ By bypassing the scrutiny of the Rajya Sabha, the Money Bill route undermines the principle of checks and
balances within the parliamentary system.
• The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) was passed by the Lok Sabha as a Money Bill, bypassing the
Rajya Sabha.
Executive Dominance and Legislative Balance:
▪ This approach tilts the balance of power heavily in favour of the ruling party or coalition, particularly in cases
where it lacks a majority in the Rajya Sabha.
▪ By enabling the government to push through legislation despite opposition, the Money Bill route diminishes
the role of the legislature as a forum for meaningful discussion, compromise, and accountability.
Expansion of Executive Discretion:
▪ The use of the Money Bill route for non-fiscal matters expands the scope of executive discretion beyond the
intended constitutional boundaries. While Article 110 provides clear criteria for classifying a Bill as a Money
Bill, the broad interpretation of "incidental matters" has allowed for the inclusion of legislative changes
unrelated to taxation or financial appropriations.
Challenges to Judicial Oversight:
▪ The reliance on the Money Bill route for controversial legislation complicates the role of the judiciary as a
check on legislative overreach. While Article 110 (3) grants final authority to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha in
determining the classification of Bills, the judiciary's ability to review such decisions is crucial for upholding
constitutional principles and preventing abuse of power.
Erosion of Public Trust:
▪ The misuse of the Money Bill route for major policy changes without adequate debate and opposition input
erodes public trust in the democratic process. This approach fosters perceptions of authoritarianism and
undermines the legitimacy of government actions, potentially leading to disenchantment with democratic
institutions.
Suggestions:
▪ Strengthening Parliamentary Scrutiny: Establish a joint committee comprising members from both the Lok
Sabha and the Rajya Sabha to review and scrutinize all proposed Money Bills. This committee would ensure
that the legislative process remains robust and comprehensive.
▪ Reviewing the List of Money Bill Criteria: Revisit the criteria listed in Article 110 (1) to ensure they align with
contemporary needs. Consider adding new criteria or modifying existing ones.
▪ Transparency and Public Participation: Mandate public consultations and expert opinions before categorizing
a Bill as a Money Bill. Publish detailed justifications for such classification.
14(b). Analyse the recent Supreme Court’s verdict on same-sex marriage with respect to the role of the judiciary
in interpreting constitutional rights.
▪ Writing about the verdict and various fundamental ▪ Analysing the various aspects of Supreme Court’s
rights associated with it. recent verdict on same-sex marriage.
Introduction
▪ The recent Supreme Court verdict on same-sex marriage in India presents a complex situation. While
acknowledging the lack of a fundamental right to marry under the Constitution for same-sex couples, the
judgement also highlights the limitations of judicial power and calls for legislative action. This verdict has far-
reaching implications for the LGBTQIA+ community and the legal landscape surrounding marriage equality.
Dimensions:
Central Points of the Verdict:
▪ No Fundamental Right to Marry: The court, in a 5-0 decision, concluded that same-sex marriage isn't a
guaranteed right under the Constitution.
Parliament's Role:
▪ The court defers the decision on legalizing same-sex marriage to the legislative branch, urging Parliament to
formulate relevant laws.
Discrimination and Equal Rights:
▪ The verdict recognizes the discriminatory nature of not recognizing same-sex relationships, emphasizing the
right to form a "union" as highlighted by Chief Justice Chandrachud.
Critique of the Judgement:
Limited Judicial Activism:
▪ Critics argue that the court could have interpreted existing laws like the Special Marriage Act (SMA) more
inclusively to encompass same-sex couples.
Social vs. Constitutional Morality:
▪ The verdict prioritizes societal norms over the progressive and individual-centric approach sometimes taken
by the judiciary (e.g., Sabarimala Temple case).
Role of the Judiciary in Interpreting Rights:
Balancing Act:
▪ Ideally, the judiciary interprets the Constitution to uphold individual rights and keep pace with evolving
societal values.
Judicial Restraint vs. Activism:
▪ There's a constant tension between judicial restraint (deferring to legislature) and activism (interpreting rights
broadly). This case reflects judicial restraint.
The way forward:
15(a). What are the constitutional provisions related to the Eighth Schedule in the context of the recent Supreme
Court decision dismissing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the inclusion of Rajasthani language? Highlight
the significance of including languages within the Eighth Schedule.
▪ Writing about features of eighth schedule and list of ▪ Discussing constitutional provisions regarding the
languages included in it. Eighth Schedule and the significance of including
languages within it, linking it to the recent
Supreme Court decision over a PIL of inclusion of
Rajasthani language.
Introduction
▪ The Supreme Court in Kanhaiya Lal Sethia & Anr vs Union of India & Anr, 1997 case stated that the inclusion
of Rajasthani as an official language in the Eighth Schedule is a policy decision of the Union, indicating it cannot
direct the Centre in this matter. The Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India holds provisions regarding
the recognition of languages in the country.
Dimensions:
Constitutional provisions:
▪ The Constitutional provisions relating to the Eighth Schedule occur in article 344(1) and 351 of the Constitution.
▪ Article 344(1) provides for the constitution of a Commission by the President on expiration of five years from
the commencement of the Constitution and thereafter at the expiration of ten years from such
commencement, which shall consist of a Chairman and such other members representing the different
languages specified in the Eighth Schedule to make recommendations to the President for the progressive use
of Hindi for official purposes of the Union.
▪ Article 351 of the Constitution provides that it shall be the duty of the Union to promote the spread of the
Hindi language to develop it so that it may serve as a medium of expression for all the elements of the
composite culture of India and to secure its enrichment by assimilating without interfering with its genius, the
forms, style and expressions used in Hindustani and in the other languages of India specified in the Eighth
Schedule, and by drawing, wherever necessary or desirable, for its vocabulary, primarily, on Sanskrit and
secondarily on other languages.
▪ It would thus appear that the Eighth Schedule was intended to promote the progressive use of Hindi and for
the enrichment and promotion of that language.
15(b). List out the major recommendations that has to be addressed by 16th Finance Commission and what are
the challenges before the Commission in addressing these recommendations?
▪ Writing about Finance Commission, its composition ▪ Major recommendations and challenges that the
and features. 16th Finance Commission need to address during
its tenure
Introduction:
▪ In accordance with Article 280(1) of the Constitution, the Indian Government has formed the Sixteenth Finance
Commission with Dr. Arvind Panagariya appointed as its chairperson.
Dimensions:
Recommendations:
Equitable Division of Tax Proceeds:
▪ The Finance Commission should propose a formula under Chapter I, Part XII of the Constitution, allocating a
percentage of central taxes to each state. This may involve considering population size to determine each
state's share, ensuring larger states receive more tax revenue to meet their higher service delivery needs.
Principles for Grants-in-Aid:
▪ The Finance Commission can set criteria for providing grants-in-aid to states under Article 275, considering
their developmental needs and fiscal discipline.
• Recommending larger grants for states with lower per capita income or higher poverty rates to address
development disparities, linking grants to fiscal responsibility targets for prudent financial management.
Enhancing State Funds for Local Bodies:
▪ To enhance the Consolidated Fund of a State for supporting local bodies, the Finance Commission could
recommend devolving a certain percentage of state revenues directly to Panchayats and Municipalities.