In India, the landscape of education is diverse and multi-faceted, with a stark
contrast between privileged and underprivileged schools. Privileged schools, often associated with affluence and prestige, play a crucial role in shaping the educational narrative of the country. Having worked as a teacher at a privileged school for more than fifteen years, I find the focus on some aspects of education to be quite concerning. Our children don't know about or have a connection to the real India, which makes me question if we are on the right course. They are global citizens who are better informed about western culture and proudly announce their ambitions to study abroad. People who intend to stay in India or who are studying are made fun of. The children take pleasure in the cutting-edge amenities and first-rate infrastructure. Is the child able to get a seat abroad because of this? My generation is referred to as "internet migrants," though I'm not sure if that's the right term given that we introduced the internet and social media in the form of Facebook, among other significant innovations, but we are still considered migrants. BYOD programmes have no place in schools, in my opinion, particularly considering the sharp decline in spelling ,reading and comprehension. Without the use of electronics, schools have an obligation to support the development of critical thinking abilities. AI is now used to handle thought processes as well; kids use ChatGPT to finish their schoolwork. It is imperative to prioritise discipline, as well as the development of IT skills and like abilities, which children will naturally acquire. It is important to remember that, in contrast to books, devices are an extension of our body. I find that when I work with pupils from disadvantaged schools, they are more well-behaved and respectful of others and the environment. They are not overly reliant on technology and are working to succeed more within their own nation. Undoubtedly, less is more.