Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Perella 03.15.13
Perella 03.15.13
U.S.A.
Europe
China
Four years ago this March, the world generally believed that the US was finally finished,
Europe would have the last laugh, and that China would reign supreme. Somehow,
thoughtful investors forgot about the power of free markets and democracy. The only
stronghold left is the debate over fiscal sustainability.
Secular Themes
hh Labor markets in the developed world are structurally hh The European Union, pardon the pun, is lying in “State”.
broken. Until—and unless—some-type of sweeping It will survive because political and practical reality
technological or political change unleashes new, or demand it, not because it should.
dilapidated! frontiers, the EVA of non-IP labor will remain in hh China is extraordinarily vulnerable, much more so
secular decline. than even tempered expectations believe. A major
hh Monetary policy is generally impotent. The mortgage restructuring of virtually all their social and financial
market is the only direct transmission mechanism the systems will happen under this new ruling class.
Fed has to stimulate Main Street and the system remains hh The commodity super-cycle is over; this is bullish for
structurally broken. some and quite bearish for others.
hh Credit creation will necessarily remain anemic because hh The global “elites” present the greatest systemic risk to
mortgage finance—both residential and commercial— the capital markets.
dominates the landscape. Moreover, there is simply no
collateral; +/-30% of homeowner’s have no debt and the hh The US is fiscally sustainable. (See Appendix)
marginal buyer has no equity—even if they have income. hh Bretton Woods “forever”, but the euro must secularly
hh Over the intermediate and long-term, fiscal stimulus decline or the EU will fail.
will continue to have a negative multiplier; tax payers hh Japan; a brave new world, and we don’t know exactly
understand the inverse relationship between what they get what it means yet. But Southeast Asia will NOT look the
now and what they will “pay for” later. same in 3 years.
hh The hegemonic position of the US will continue to grow hh Say goodbye to my little friend elastic, economic
stronger. cyclicality.
hh Stable and/or accelerating profit growth will be
concentrated in companies with oligopolistic-type market
positions and IP; the rest will continue to weaken.
hh Stock are rising because cash flow stability/earnings and
dividend yield is compelling on a risk-adjusted basis.
50%
35%
65%
40%
30%
60%
30%
25%
55%
20%
20%
10% 50%
15%
0%
45%
10%
-10%
1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 40% 5%
US Employees on Nonfarm Payrolls Total SA 120-Month % Change 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
US Employees On Nonfarm Payrolls Total Government SA 120-Month % Change Private Service as Percent of Total (LS) Govt as Percent of Total (RS)
US Employees on Nonfarm Payrolls Total Private SA 120-Month % Change Manufacturing as Percent of Total (RS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Sixth Man Research Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Sixth Man Research
US Manufacturing Output Growth vs. Average annual percentage point increase, (cycle-by-cycle)
Manufacturing Labor Decline 1950-2010
Non-financial Household
900
Total Economy Private economy Nonfarm Debt
800 y = 50e0.6931x Business Debt as a Debt as a % of Corporate Debt as as a
R² = 1 Cycle % of GDP Private Sector GDP a % of New Worth % of PDI
700
2Q58-1Q60 -1.0 0.2 0.2 2.3
1Q61-3Q69 -0.3 2.0 1.2 0.6
600
4Q70-3Q73 -0.1 0.8 0.7 0.3
500
1Q75-4Q79 1.2 0.2 0.2 1.6
4Q82-2Q90 7.4 6.6 3.3 2.4
400 1Q91-4Q00 3.7 5.1 -2.5 1.7
Average 1.8 2.5 0.5 1.5
300 4Q01-Current 10.0 10.1 -1.2 5.6
0
1950 1980 2010
"US Manufacturing Output (1950=100) "US Manufacturing Workers (1950=100)
Expon. ("US Manufacturing Output (1950=100)) Linear ("US Manufacturing Workers (1950=100))
LIFESTYLE
$150,000
CONSUMER CREDIT / LEVERAGE
$100,000
$50,000
$0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
ECONOMIC VALUE ADD Diaposable Income / 10-Treasury
Source: National Assoc. of Realtors, Federal Reserve, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bloomberg, KSR
MEW / GDP US Nominal Dollars SAAR Debt Growth vs. GDP Growth
3,000
4.5%
2,500
4.0%
3.5% 2,000
3.0%
1,500
2.5%
1,000
2.0%
1.5% 500
1.0%
0
0.5%
-500
0.0% 1961 1965 1969 1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009
Jun-95 Aug-96 Oct-97 Nov-98 Jan-00 Mar-01 May-02 Jul-03 Sep-04 Nov-05 Jan-07 Mar-08 Annual $ Change US Non-Financial Debt Annual $ Change US GDP
Source: Bloomberg, KSR Source: Federal Reserve, , Bureau of Economic Analysis, Sixth Man Research
EQUITY
LABOR
22%
LIFE EXPECTANCY
21%
BASE EQUITY
20%
SAVINGS
EXPECTED RETURNS INVESTMENTS
19%
18%
WAGE
EXPECTATIONS
CONSUMPTION
17%
SAFETY NETS
16%
LIKELY
15% DEPENDENTS
Jan-92 Oct-93 Jul-95 Apr-97 Jan-99 Oct-00 Jul-02 Apr-04 Jan-06 Oct-07 Jul-09 Apr-11
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Sixth Man Research
200
12% +2 Stdev
9% +1 Stdev 180
6%
Mean 160
3%
-1 Stdev
140
0%
-2 Stdev
120
-3%
-3 Stdev
-6% 100
Jan-99 Mar-00 May-01 Jul-02 Sep-03 Nov-04 Jan-06 Mar-07 May-08 Jul-09 Sep-10 Nov-11
-4 Stdev
-9% US Personal Income SAAR Indexed 100=1-31-1999
1950 1954 1958 1962 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 Personal Income Transfer Payments to Persons SA Indexed 100=1-31-1999
Source: Bloomberg, Sixth Man Research Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Sixth Man Research
0% 40
Dec. 2012
Non-Farm Payroll as a Percent of Peak NFP
-2% 30
25
-3%
20
Current
-4%
15
-5%
10
-6%
5
-7%
(28) (26) (24) (22) (20) (18) (16) (14) (12) (10) (8) (6) (4) (2) 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 0
Number of Months Before to After Maximum Job Loss 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1948 1953 1957 1960 1970 1974 1980 1981 1990 2001 2007 Unemployment Rate (%)
23 24 25 21 19 20 11 29 33 49 55 1948 to Dec 2008 Jan 2009 - Dec 2009 Jan 2010 - Dec 2012 Linear (1948 to Dec 2008)
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Sixth Man Research Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Sixth Man Research
NON-COMPETITIVE 1,000
CREDIT CONTRACTION
800
SHARE GAINS
600
FLAT REVENUE
400
200
WELL FINANCED; STABLE/GROWING
MARKET SHARE; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE 0
40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 140,000
US Corp Profits With IVA and CCA Domestic Industries Total SA 1950 to 2008
US Corp Profits With IVA and CCA Domestic Industries Total SA 2009 to Q2 2012
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Sixth Man Research
Relative Strength of US Corporate Net Cash Flow Nominal Hourly Wage Growth
SA versus US Nominal GDP (SAAR) 10.0
14%
9.0
13% 8.0
12% 7.0
6.0
11%
5.0
10%
4.0
9%
3.0
8%
2.0
7%
1.0
6% 0.0
1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Sixth Man Research Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Sixth Man Research
Profits and transfer payments explode and the strong recover slowly
US Corporate Profits vs. Household Net Worth Government Transfers as Pct of Personal Income
Indexed 100=3-31-1960 20%
5,000
19%
4,500
18%
4,000
17%
3,500
3,000 16%
2,500 15%
2,000
14%
1,500
13%
1,000
12%
500
0 11%
1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011
US Corporate Profits With IVA and CCA Net Cash Flow SA Indexed 100=3-31-1960
10%
FOF Federal Reserve US Households & NPO Net Worth Nominal $ Value Indexed 100=3-31-1960
1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Federal Reserve, SMR Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Sixth Man Research
15%
10 +3 Stdev
100%
10% +2 Stdev
80%
5
5% +1 Stdev
60%
0
Median
0% 40%
-5 20%
-1 Stdev
-5%
-2 Stdev
0%
-10
-10%
-3 Stdev
-20%
-15% -15
1969 1972 1975 1977 1980 1982 1985 1988 1990 1993 1995 1998 2000 2003 2006 2008 2011 -4 Stdev
-40%
Net financial investment / Disposable Personal Income US Personal Saving as a % of Disposable Income (RS) 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010
Source: Federal Reserve, Sixth Man Research Source: Federal Reserve, Bloomberg, SMR
Deflation is moving East and without MEW the economy can’t purr
Nominal$ YoY US Disposable Income vs.
Annualized Cash-Out Mortgage Refis
900 900
700 700
500 500
300 300
100 100
-100 -100
-300 -300
-500 -500
Dec-99 Jan-01 Feb-02 Mar-03 Apr-04 May-05 Jun-06 Jul-07 Aug-08 Sep-09 Oct-10 Nov-11
Disposable Personal Income From The GDP Report US$ SAAR YoY Net Change
U.S. Net Home Equity Extraction Active Mortgage Equity Withdrawal
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Sixth Man Research
30-Year Mortgage Rates (inverted) vs Mortgage Refi Index GDP US Nominal Dollars SAAR / Monetary Base
9,000 3.0
17
8,000 3.5
15
7,000
4.0
6,000
4.5 13
5,000
5.0
4,000 11
5.5
3,000
9
6.0
2,000
1,000 6.5 7
0 7.0
Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12 5
MBA Refinancing Index SA Mortgage Bankers FRM 30-Year Contract (RS) Dec-99 Jun-01 Dec-02 Jun-04 Dec-05 Jun-07 Dec-08 Jun-10 Dec-11
Source: Mortgage Bankers Association, Sixth Man Research Source: Bloomberg, Sixth Man Research
25%
85
20%
80
15%
10% 75
5%
70
0%
-5% 65
1950 1953 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 1967 1970 1973 1976 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012
US Recession GDP US Nominal Dollars SAAR 8-Quarter % Change US Recession US Capacity Utilization % of Total Capacity SA
Source: NBER, Bureau of Economic Anal, Sixth Man Research Source: NBER, Federal Reserve, Sixth Man Research
US Auto Sales Total Annualized SA NFIB Small Business Good Time to Expand
22
26
20
18 21
16
16
14
11
12
10 6
8
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
1
US Recession US Auto Sales Total Annualized SA Jan-99 Mar-00 May-01 Jul-02 Sep-03 Nov-04 Jan-06 Mar-07 May-08 Jul-09 Sep-10 Nov-11
Source: NBER, Bloomberg Indices, Sixth Man Research Source: Nat'l Fed. of Ind. Business, Sixth Man Research
6.0 60%
55%
5.0
China (96-2009) 50%
50%
4,000
0
Economic Benefit Net Present Liability of
from Expected Future Tax
-1,000
Fiscal Spending Increases
-2,000
May-08 Oct-08 Mar-09 Aug-09 Jan-10 Jun-10 Nov-10 Apr-11 Sep-11 Feb-12 Jul-12 Dec-12
Source: The People's Bank of China, Sixth Man Research
12
50%
10
8
40%
4 30%
20%
0
Oct-10 Dec-10 Feb-11 Apr-11 Jun-11 Aug-11 Oct-11 Dec-11 Feb-12 Apr-12 Jun-12 Aug-12 Oct-12 Dec-12
Persons Claiming Emergency Unemployment Compensation Benefits
Persons Claiming Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits
10%
US Continuing Jobless Claims NSA
1947 1951 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011
Source: Department of Labor, Sixth Man Research Source: Federal Reserve, Sixth Man Research
Home Sales vs. Transaction Dollar Volume US Commercial Bank Assets Loans & Leases
7.5 1,700
Commercial & Industrial SA 13-Week % Change
7.0 7%
1,500
6.5
5%
1,300
6.0
3%
$ Billions SAAR
5.5 1,100
1%
5.0
900
-1%
4.5
700 -3%
4.0
-5%
3.5 500
Jan-00 Feb-01 Mar-02 Apr-03 May-04 Jun-05 Jul-06 Aug-07 Sep-08 Oct-09 Nov-10 Dec-11
US Existing Homes Sales Millions SAAR -7%
Existing Home Sales Transaction Value (Sales * Median Price) (RS) Apr-05 Dec-05 Aug-06 Apr-07 Dec-07 Aug-08 Apr-09 Dec-09 Aug-10 Apr-11 Dec-11 Aug-12
Source: National Assoc. of Realtors, Sixth Man Research Source: Federal Reserve, Sixth Man Research
EQUIVALENT
RENT
1.2
COST OF CAPITAL
LOCATION PREMIUM
(e.g. PROPERTY TAXES, SCHOOLS, ETC 0.2
COMMUNITY LEVEL
SUSTAINABLE CASH FLOWS
-0.3
Jan-99 Mar-00 May-01 Jul-02 Sep-03 Nov-04 Jan-06 Mar-07 May-08 Jul-09 Sep-10 Nov-11 Jan-13
Source: Bloomberg, Sixth Man Research
1,200
70 220
200
60 1,000
180
50
800
160
40
600 140
30
120
20 400
100
10
200 80
Oct-07 Mar-08 Aug-08 Jan-09 Jun-09 Nov-09 Apr-10 Sep-10 Feb-11 Jul-11 Dec-11 May-12 Oct-12
0 Commercial Paper Outstanding Financial Seasonally Adjusted
1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 Commercial Paper Outstanding for Special Categories Asset Backed-Seasonally Adj
US Recession National Association of Home Builders Market Index SA Commercial Paper Outstanding Non Financial Seasonally Adjusted (RS)
Source: NBER, National Association of Home Builders, Sixth Man Research Source: Federal Reserve, Sixth Man Research
Commodities are done, political uncertainty isn’t, and we are getting old
US Stock Prices Relative to Commodity Prices Figure 1: Index of Economic Policy Uncertainty
(Jan 1985 – Nov 2012) Debt Ceiling Dispute;
102.4
Four Periods of Commodity Outperformance Euro Debt
Ongoing
Fiscal Cliff
Obama
Election Banking
51.2 Crisis
Lehman
200
Black and
Monday Gulf 9/11
TARP
150
Act
Logarithmic Scale
rate cuts,
Russian
Stimulus
6.4 Crisis/LTCM
2010
100
3.2 Midterm
Elections
1.6
50
0.8
Notes: Index of Policy-Related Economic Uncertainty composed of 4 series: monthly news articles containing uncertain or uncertainty, economic or economy,
and policy relevant terms (scaled by the smoothed number of articles containing ‘today’); the number of tax laws expiring in coming years, and a composite of IQ
0.4 ranges for quarterly forecasts of federal, state, and local government expenditures and 1-year CPI from the Phil. Fed Survey of Forecasters. Weights: 1/2 News-
1871 1881 1891 1901 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 based, 1/6 tax expirations, 1/6 CPI disagreement, 1/6 expenditures disagreement after each index normalized to have a standard-deviation of 1. Data from Jan
1985-Nov 2012. Index normalized mean 100 from 1985-2009. Data at www.policyuncertainty.com
Source: Shiller, US Census Bureau, Bloomberg, KSR
64
62
60
58
56
54
52
1950 1953 1956 1959 1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Sixth Man Research
700
10 340
650
320
8 600
300
550
6 280
500
260
450
4
240 400
2 220 350
Aug-11 Sep-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Feb-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Jan-13
Moody's BAA Less 10Y US Corp HY Avg YTM Less 10Y
0
Jan-04 Oct-04 Jul-05 Apr-06 Jan-07 Oct-07 Jul-08 Apr-09 Jan-10 Oct-10 Jul-11 Apr-12 Jan-13
S&P 500 Index Equity Dividend Yield 12M
FINRA - BLP Active Investment Grade US Corporate Bond Average Yield to Maturity
US 10-Year Yield
US 30-Year Yield
Source: Standard & Poor's, FINRA-BLOOMBERG, Bloomberg Indices, Sixth Man Research S&P 500 Dividends Aristocrats TR / S&P 500 Index
With 10-year rates at 1.8% and long bond marginally above 3%, the S&P 80%
50%
Jan-04 Oct-04 Jul-05 Apr-06 Jan-07 Oct-07 Jul-08 Apr-09 Jan-10 Oct-10 Jul-11 Apr-12 Jan-13
Source: Bloomberg, Sixth Man Research
17
15
15
13
13
11
11
9 9
7
7
5
5
3
1
1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010
1
Moody's Bond Indices Corporate BAA US 10-Year Yield
1962 1965 1968 1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010
Source: Bloomberg Indices, Sixth Man Research Source: Moody's Investors Service, Bloomberg Indices, Sixth Man Research
In this report, we will not address our heterodox views on the U.S.
monetary system, the real effects of Federal Reserve policy, and In October of 2008, back in the early days of Sixth Man Research,
our shocking belief that U.S. Government interest rates are set and we published “Corporate Bonds: The Best Equity”. In that piece we
bounded by Fed policy and arbitrage—not the free markets. asserted that the markets did not understand the likely path of the
global recovery and that the world was short both unencumbered
However, everyone agrees that bonds have been in a 30+ year secular collateral with stable values, and consumers with predictable cash
bull market which, as Mark Twain might say, has persevered despite flows and “excess” equity margin.
many claims that it was dead.
Since then, the flood of both institutional and retail money flowing
The simple fact is that bond yields reflect the relative cost and into bonds has been spectacular, catalyzing a major shift in
demand for safety, the availability of investment capital, the credit portfolio weights.
worthiness of the lender and, of course, inflation expectations.
As discussed in “Savor the ‘Saviors’, pension funds and their
One might believe that the Fed’s QE programs have substantively consultants validated this shift through a concept called “Liability
suppressed Treasury yields, but the data only suggest about a 20 bp Driven Investing.”
impact on 10-year bonds.
36
2,900
31
26
2,400
21
1,900
16
1,400 11
6
900 Jan-02 Mar-03 May-04 Jul-05 Sep-06 Nov-07 Jan-09 Mar-10 May-11 Jul-12
Jan-09 May-09 Sep-09 Jan-10 May-10 Sep-10 Jan-11 May-11 Sep-11 Jan-12 May-12 Sep-12 Jan-13 Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund Weekly Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund 200-Week SMA
Source: Bloomberg, Sixth Man Research Source: US, Bloomberg, Sixth Man Research
The Value Line arithmetic index is an equal weighted Dodd-Frank is a joke and so is Basel. The mega-banks are
basket of 1650 stocks will always be too big to fail and they will always receive
regulatory and capital market forbearance
Dow Jones Transportation Average Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
6,500 45
6,000
5,500
40
5,000
4,500
4,000 35
3,500
3,000
30
2,500
2,000
1,500 25
Jan-00 Feb-01 Mar-02 Apr-03 May-04 Jun-05 Jul-06 Aug-07 Sep-08 Oct-09 Nov-10 Dec-11 Jan-13 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12 Oct-12 Jan-13
Source: Dow Jones, Sixth Man Research Source: US, Sixth Man Research
The DJ transport index has “finally” confirmed Shale gas is a big deal; sophisticated engineering
resources and weaker labor unions are making “made in
the USA” a really attractive thing
U.S. Pension Fund Asset Allocation Defined-Benefit Pension Plan Asset Allocation
(Towers Watson Global Pension Survey 2012)
60%
100% 2%
5%
17%
90%
25%
50%
80% 28%
23%
70%
40%
60% 31%
50%
30%
40%
65%
30% 60%
20%
44%
20%
10%
10%
1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
0%
2001 2006 2011 Stocks as a Percent of Total Credit Market Instruments as Percent of Assets
Equities Bonds Other Cash
Source: Towers Watson Global Pension Survey 20120; Sixth Man Research Source: Federal Reserve, Sixth Man Research
Although pension fund allocations are materially more So here it is graphically. For those pension plans who are required
“sophisticated” (as supported by the quintupling of “Other” assets; to fund their retiree pool from operations, the pain of falling stocks,
e.g. Hedge Funds, PE Funds, timber, etc.), we believe many portfolios falling interest rates, and rising obligations was just too much.
are have become dangerously uncorrelated to the equity markets
and increasingly dependent upon private equity for outsized, long- And although this strategic shift might have deadened the
term alpha. pain, U.S. corporate pension plans remain, on average, ~25%
underfunded.
Moreover, by heartily embracing a duration matching strategy after
the most of the meltdown in global equities was complete, many
institutions have essentially de-risked at the bottom of the market.
Just a week after publishing Savor the “Saviors”, we were pleasantly surprised to see data confirming
our rotation thesis. Although one week of flows does not make a trend and we can’t yet verify that
US institutions have begun shifting their $16 trillion asset pool, we can confidently assert two critical
points:
1. The consensus is wrong. The lift in equities—despite rising sentiment indicators—is not being
fueled by confidence or complacency; it’s just the opposite. The market is fearful of bonds.
2. Capital flows must never be confused with trading capital; they are the stuff of rising tides,
breached levees, and flood waters.
We graciously thank Grantham Mayo (GMO) for publicly sharing As shown in the table above, institutional portfolios have become
their rolling 7-Year asset class return forecasts. In our experience, wholly dependent upon “other” assets to drive plan returns.
their work has been remarkably accurate and, directionally, we have
little disagreement with this table. As is patently obvious from the fund raising success private equity
firms have had throughout the past several years, it is clear that
However, we do believe that the US equity returns will likely be pension fund CIOs have been lured—and essentially trapped—by
higher—and emerging returns lower—than their expectations; but the high-return promises of these funds, despite the very poor
of most import to this note, are their shocking forecasts for bond returns realized in recent vintages.
returns.
Of course, as always, there is game-theory at play. Private equity
We would suggest that negative bond returns would be more funds have a nice habit of not marking assets to market along
consistent with higher equity returns, but the key takeaway is the the way; ergo, pension funds and their consultants can plug their
spread: some ~600+ bps. returns in a variety of creative ways.
Net New Equity vs. Bond & Hybrid Fund Flows Cumulative Equity Less Bond & Hybrid Flows
ICI Mutual Fund Data (1990 - November 2012)
ICI Mutual Fund Data (1990 - November 2012) 1,600,000
2,500,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
800,000
$USD Billions
600,000
1,500,000
$USD Billions
400,000
200,000
1,000,000
0
-200,000
500,000 -400,000
Jan-90 Dec-91 Nov-93 Oct-95 Sep-97 Aug-99 Jul-01 Jun-03 May-05 Apr-07 Mar-09 Feb-11
Source: Bloomberg, Sixth Man Research
0
Jan-90 Dec-91 Nov-93 Oct-95 Sep-97 Aug-99 Jul-01 Jun-03 May-05 Apr-07 Mar-09 Feb-11
Cumulative Equity Bond & Hypbrid Flows
Source: Sixth Man Research
Also, quite predictably, the retail equity/bond balance hit a peak of 70% at 50%
the top of the 2000 internet bubble, had a resurgence into the top of the
housing bubble (60%), and has now fallen to 30%. 40%
30%
With 10-year Treasury rates at 1.8% and corporate bond prices pegged,
what can the retail investor do? 20%
10%
0%
-10%
Dec-91 Sep-93 Jun-95 Mar-97 Dec-98 Sep-00 Jun-02 Mar-04 Dec-05 Sep-07 Jun-09 Mar-11
Source: Bloomberg, Sixth Man Research
HFRX Equity Hedge Index vs. SPX Percent of HFRX Strategies Beating the SPX
180 (Indexed 100=12-31-2006) (Relative to Trailing 6-Months)
100%
160
90%
80%
140
70%
60%
120
50%
100 40%
30%
80
20%
10%
60
Dec-08 Apr-09 Aug-09 Dec-09 Apr-10 Aug-10 Dec-10 Apr-11 Aug-11 Dec-11 Apr-12 Aug-12 0%
HFRX Equity Hedge Index Indexed 100=12-31-2006 S&P 500 Index Indexed 100=12-31-2006 Jan-06 Aug-06 Mar-07 Oct-07 May-08 Dec-08 Jul-09 Feb-10 Sep-10 Apr-11 Nov-11 Jun-12
Source: Hedge Fund Research, Standard & Poor's, Sixth Man Research Source: Sixth Man Research
Disclosures
This memorandum is based upon information available to the public. No representation is made that it is accurate or complete.
No mention of a particular security, index, derivative, or other instrument in this memorandum is an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell
the securities mentioned herein, nor does it constitute an opinion of the suitability and appropriateness of investing in any financial instrument.
This memorandum is provided solely for the information of professional investors who are expected to make their own investment decisions without undue
reliance on this memorandum. Furthermore, Sixth Man Research has no obligation to notify investors when opinions or information in this report change and,
Sixth Man Research may disseminate differing views from time to time pertinent to the specific requirements of different investors.
Sixth Man Research publications are protected by applicable United States and foreign copyright laws and distributed to known clients and contacts only. No
person or entity may lawfully redistribute, publish, or display the content of said publications without prior consent from Sixth Man Research, LLC.
©2013 Sixth Man Research, LLC. Sixth Man Research is not a registered investment advisor.