Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inline Corrugated Board Creasing
Inline Corrugated Board Creasing
Inline Corrugated Board Creasing
com
ScienceDirect
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ProcediaScienceDirect
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Manufacturing 00 (2019) 000–000
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
ScienceDirect
Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2019) 000–000
www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
Abstract
Corrugated board sheets that are used in corrugated boxes have to be cut and creased before being folded and glued in the shape
Abstract
of the final box. Cutting and creasing are done by rolling a sheet of corrugated between rollers, carrying ribs that either cut or
Corrugated
crease board sheets
the corrugated. thattechnology
This are used iniscorrugated
applied forboxes have
decades andtoperforms
be cut andvery
creased
well.before being
However thefolded
rollersand
haveglued
to beinprepared
the shape
in
of the final
advance andbox.
oneCutting and creasing
pair of rollers are done
is required by rolling
for each a sheet
type and eachofdimension
corrugated ofbetween
a box. rollers, carrying ribs that either cut or
crease the corrugated. This technology is applied for decades and performs very well. However the rollers have to be prepared in
advance and one
In case boxes havepair
to of
be rollers is required
produced for each
on demand, eachtype
and and
everyeach
boxdimension
might have ofaaspecific
box. size. Cutting and creasing between
rollers is not possible and an alternative method is required. A corrugated board is put on an air permeable carpet. Underneath the
In casevacuum
carpet boxes have to be produced
is created to preventonthedemand, eachmoving.
board from and every box
It is might
then have aaspecific
cut using size.
sliding or Cutting
a rolling and creasing
knife. Creasingbetween
is done by a
rollerswheel
small is not that
possible and over
is rolled an alternative method
the cardboard is required.
along A corrugated
the folding lines, calledboard is put
top side on an air permeable carpet. Underneath the
creasing.
carpet vacuum is created to prevent the board from moving. It is then cut using a sliding or a rolling knife. Creasing is done by a
small wheeltypes
Numerous that of
is rolled over the
corrugated cardboard
board exist in along
terms the folding
of flute lines,
sizes and called top side
paper types. creasing.
Creasing can be done parallel to the flutes or
under an angle. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the optimal shape of the creasing wheel used for top side creasing. This
Numerous types
paper presents of corrugated
experimental board exist
research aimingin terms of flute sizes
at the optimal shapeandof apaper types. Creasing
multi-purpose canwheel.
creasing be done parallel to the flutes or
under an angle. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the optimal shape of the creasing wheel used for top side creasing. This
paper presents experimental research aiming at the optimal shape of a multi-purpose creasing wheel.
©
© 2020 TheAuthors.
2020 The Authors.Published
Published by Elsevier
by Elsevier Ltd. Ltd.
This is an
This is anopen
openaccess
access article
article under
under the BY-NC-ND
the CC CC BY-NC-ND licenselicense (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Peer-review
Peer-review underresponsibility
under
© 2020 The Authors.responsibility
Published byofof
thethe scientific
scientific
Elsevier committee
Ltd. committee of FAIM
of the the FAIM2020.2021.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Keywords: e-commerce;
Peer-review packaging; box
under responsibility making;
of the cardboard
scientific processing;
committee creasing
of the FAIM 2020.
2. Creasing effectiveness
Over a hundred (108) board types with a wide variety of flute In the second test phase all board types have been creased in
sizes, paper thicknesses, paper qualities and a mixture of single both orientations using two different creasing wheels (WD=50
flute and double flute boards were available for testing. and WD=90mm) at the maximum creasing depth. For all
Creasing, cutting and testing has been performed as 50% combinations, 5 identical samples are cut. Since the maximum
relative humidity and 23°C according to the ISO 187 standard. creasing depth has been determined as described above, all
All board types provided are marked by a blind board type code. samples comply with the first criterion for effective creasing.
The actual board type description is not provided. Occasional All samples are folded (initial folding and final folding). A
reference to paper thickness, paper quality, flute size, … in the combination of wheel, board type and creasing orientation is
text below is based on obvious visual observations only. considered to generate effective creasing if all samples of this
combination pass the four criteria.
In a first phase preliminary tests have been performed in order Both wheels were effective for creasing perpendicular to the
to find flute direction. No tearing was observed during final folding
• The “worst case” creasing orientation according to the third criterion and the folding line was very
• The “worst case” creasing position straight in all cases.
• A strategy for choosing the creasing depth. Parallel to the flute direction both wheels were effective for
For these tests 10 randomly selected cardboard types have been some single flute cardboards with thick high quality top liner
used in combination with a creasing wheel (WD=50mm) that is but both wheels failed for the cheaper and for double flute
commercially available and frequently used for creasing solid thicker cardboard types. Some samples failed on the second
cardboard and plastics. The tests are performed at a creasing criterion and folded (partly) at a distance from the crease line.
speed of 800mm/s, corresponding to the speed that might be Some samples failed on the third criterion and most double flute
required in industrial box making machines. boards failed on the fourth criterion. It is concluded to focus on
The orientation of the creasing relative to the flute direction, has the parallel direction for finding a universal creasing wheel.
been varied in steps of 30°. All orientations except parallel to
the flutes, gave almost identical results. It is therefore decided In a third test phase 12 additional wheel types are sequentially
to test creasing in two orientations only: perpendicular and built and tested. The lip diameter (LD) and lip overhang (LH)
parallel to the flutes. are considered to influence tearing during creasing and thus
In case of creasing parallel to the flutes, the position of the limit the creasing depth. Increasing the wheel width (WW) and
wheel relative to the flute, is important. Deeper creasing varying the free angle (H) are supposed to be more effective
without tearing the paper is achievable if the creasing wheel is especially for double flute boards. In two wide wheels, a double
aligned with the top of the flute (Fig. 3b). Creasing in the free angle (H and MH) is applied in an attempt to weaken more
middle between two flutes (Fig. 3a) is more risky for tearing. flutes without tearing the top liner paper during creasing. These
By varying the position of the creasing wheel relative to the 12 wheels are tested in combination with the “difficult to
flute, it is concluded that the worst position of the creasing crease” cardboard types of phase 2. In case the creasing turned
wheel is at about 20% of the distance between two flutes (Fig. out to be effective, samples of the other cardboard types have
3c). It is decided to do the creasing tests in the parallel direction been cut and tested as well.
at this position (20%-80%) between two flutes.
Finally it is observed that the maximum achievable creasing One small wheel (WD=50) turns out to be effective for 96% of
depth (avoiding the top paper to tear) in the perpendicular the available types of board. It just fails for some double flute
orientation is significantly more compared to the parallel boards with very thin or very low quality paper layers. One
orientation. Applying the maximum creasing depth in the larger wheel (WD=90) is effective for all types of cardboard.
perpendicular direction improves the straightness of the fold.
Taking into account that a box designer is aware of the flute 4. Further observations and conclusions
direction when applying crease lines and taking into account
that state-of-the-art machinery can adopt the creasing depth This research clarifies the need for research on top side creasing
according to the creasing orientation, it is decided to use a of corrugated cardboard. It suggests four verifiable criteria for
specific creasing depth for each orientation in the next phase of creasing effectiveness, introduces a test method for initial
creasing tests. Both creasing depths will be determined folding and further focusses on the influence of creasing wheel
experimentally for each combination of creasing wheel and parameters.
cardboard type, by increasing the depth while creasing in steps Within this focus it is concluded that:
of 0.2mm until tearing occurs. The depth of the previous step
will be retained. 1. Creasing parallel to the flutes is the most challenging
creasing orientation.
2. Creasing depth should be adopted to the creasing
orientation: the creasing depth parallel to the flutes is
limited by tearing of the top liner paper while this
Fig. 3. Different creasing locations parallel to the flutes creasing depth does not result in straight folds after
creasing in the perpendicular orientation.
504 W.Nica, R. et al. / Procedia Manufacturing 51 (2020) 501–504
4 R. Chalmet / Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2019) 000–000
3. A universal top side creasing wheel is a large wheel as Appendix A. Folding test setup
introduced in Fig. 1b having an indicative diameter of
90mm or more.
4. In an inline box making machine, the crease spout
should be outside the part of the board that is effectively
used for the box. The spout length increases with the
creasing wheel diameter and therefore a smaller wheel
(WD=50mm) might be preferable since it reduces board
waste. The use of some lower quality corrugated board
types must then be avoided. Fig. 4. Folding test: symbolic representation.
[1]
Acknowledgement https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=W0ofWE1uPcE&feat
ure=emb_logo
This research was partially supported by VPK packaging [2] The Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology, edited by Aaron L.
group providing all cardboard requested and by Summa NV Brody and Kenneth S. Marsh, New York, 1997, John Wiley & Sons.
providing a high tech flatbed cutting machine to prepare all
samples. Summa NV is willing to advise on proper creasing [3] FEFCO, World standards – comparison testing standards
wheel and cardboard type combinations. FEFCO/EN/ISO/TAPPI, revision October 2018,
http://www.fefco.org/technical-information/standards-guidelines.